Search This Blog

Friday, August 1, 2025

Senate strikes deal to approve funding bills ahead of August recess

 Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, announced Friday afternoon that the chamber will be moving forward to pass its first tranche of government funding bills for fiscal 2026.

The chamber will vote on three full-year funding plans that cover the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration, legislative branch operations, military construction and rural development.

Senators will first vote on a series of amendments from both sides of the aisle as part of the process, and a final vote is expected Friday night.

“It’s taken a great deal of work, good faith and negotiation to get to this point,” Collins said upon announcing the development from the Senate floor Friday.

The deal comes after days of uncertainty on both sides of the aisle over whether the chamber would be able to pass any funding bills before its August recess.

The evolving package had undergone several revisions this week. Republican leaders dealt with frustration in their ranks over some of the funding levels in the legislative branch funding bill, while Democratic resistance to the Trump administration’s relocation plans for the FBI’s headquarters weighed down efforts to pass the annual Justice Department funding bill.

In remarks on the Senate floor, Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, called the bills “the best chance we have to get the best outcome for folks back home,” while pushing members against another funding stopgap, also known as a continuing resolution (CR), like what the party was forced to swallow in March to keep the government open.

“We cannot have another slush fund CR that gives away more power to Trump,” she said.

Together, the bills would provide more than $180 billion in discretionary funding for the agencies for fiscal 2026 — well more than half of which would go toward the annual Veterans Affairs and military construction funding plan.

Lawmakers are hoping to pass further funding legislation when they return from recess in September, as Congress braces for what could be a messy funding fight to keep the government open beyond the start of the fiscal year in October.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5432864-senate-funding-bills-deal/

CDC bars expert groups from advising on vaccines







The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) told some expert groups that they will no longer be able to help review scientific data used to issue vaccine recommendations.


Some members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice’s (ACIP) working groups, including physician groups and infectious disease specialists, were sent e-mails late Thursday notifying them that they will no longer serve on the subcommittees.



The groups were removed from the subcommittees because they were deemed biased by the Trump administration, according to a copy of the email shared with The Hill.



“By definition, Liason organizations are special interest groups and therefore are expected to have a ‘bias’ based on their constituency/and or population that they represent,” the email reads.



“It is important that the ACIP Workgroup activities remain free of influence from any special interest groups so ACIP workgroups will no longer include Liason organizations.”



Eight of the advisory groups released a joint statement Friday saying they are “deeply disappointed” that they are now barred from informing the development of vaccine recommendations.



“For decades liaisons from our organizations have reviewed published and unpublished data and literature related to vaccine efficacy, effectiveness, and safety and provided unbiased input for ACIP’s consideration,” the statement reads.



“To remove our deep medical expertise from this vital and once transparent process is irresponsible, dangerous to our nation’s health, and will further undermine public and clinician trust in vaccines.”



The groups, which include the American Medical Association, as well as the Infectious Diseases Society of America, called on the Trump administration to reconsider their exclusion from the vaccine review process.



A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the CDC, said that experts will continue to be included in the review process based on “relevant experience and expertise.”



“Under the old ACIP, outside pressure to align with vaccine orthodoxy limited asking the hard questions,” the spokesperson wrote. “The old ACIP members were plagued by conflicts of interest, influence and bias.”



The notice is the latest move from the Trump administration to shake up the nation’s vaccine policy and is another major change to the CDC’s advisory panel on vaccines.



HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr abruptly fired all 17 sitting members of ACIP in early June, accusing them of having conflicts of interest and rubber-stamping decisions related to the COVID-19 vaccine.



He then replaced the panel with eight hand-picked appointees, including some vaccine skeptics.

https://thehill.com/newsletters/health-care/5433074-cdc-bars-expert-groups-from-advising-on-vaccines/

China State Media Asks Nvidia to Prove H20 Chips Are Secure

 


China state media is calling for Nvidia Corp. to prove that its H20 chip is secure, saying it can’t allow flawed chips into the country.

China’s top internet watchdog summoned Nvidia representatives earlier this week to discuss what Chinese officials called significant security vulnerabilities in the H20. The Cyberspace Administration of China said that Nvidia would need to explain potential security risks and provide documents as needed, citing comments by US lawmakers about the need to install tracking capabilities on advanced chips being exported.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-01/china-state-media-asks-nvidia-to-prove-h20-chips-are-secure

Meta to share AI infrastructure costs via $2 billion sale of data center assets

 Meta Platforms is pressing ahead with efforts to bring in outside partners to help fund the massive infrastructure needed to power artificial intelligence, disclosing plans in a filing on Thursday to offload $2 billion in data center assets as part of that strategy.

The strategy reflects a broader shift among tech giants — long known for self-funding growth — as they grapple with the soaring cost of building and powering data centers to support generative AI.

The social media giant said earlier this week that it was exploring ways to work with financial partners to co-develop data centers to help finance its massive capital outlay for next year.

“We’re exploring ways to work with financial partners to co-develop data centers,” Meta Chief Finance Officer Susan Li said on a post-earnings conference call on Wednesday.

While the company still expects to fund much of its capital spending internally, some projects could attract “significant external financing” and offer more flexibility if infrastructure needs shift over time, Li said.

The company did not have any finalized transactions to announce, she said.

The disclosure in Meta's quarterly filing, however, signals that plans are firming up.

In its quarterly filing on Thursday, Meta said it had approved a plan in June to dispose of certain data center assets and reclassified $2.04 billion worth of land and construction-in-progress as "held-for-sale".

These assets were expected to be contributed to a third party within the next twelve months for co-developing data centers.

Meta did not record a loss on the reclassification, which values the assets at the lower of their carrying amounts or fair value less costs to sell. As of June 30, total held-for-sale assets stood at $3.26 billion, according to the filing.

Meta declined to comment for this story.

CEO Mark Zuckerberg has laid out plans to invest hundreds of billions of dollars into constructing AI data center “superclusters” for superintelligence.

“Just one of these covers a significant part of the footprint of Manhattan,” he said.

The Instagram and WhatsApp owner on Wednesday raised the bottom end of its annual capital expenditures forecast by $2 billion, to $66 billion to $72 billion.

It reported stronger-than-expected ad sales, boosted by AI-driven improvements to targeting and content delivery. Executives said those gains were helping offset rising infrastructure costs tied to its long-term AI push.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/meta-share-ai-infrastructure-costs-212234721.html

'US, NATO developing novel funding mechanism for Ukraine weapons transfers'

 The U.S. and NATO are working on a novel approach to supply Ukraine with weapons using funds from NATO countries to pay for the purchase or transfer of U.S. arms, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

The renewed transatlantic cooperation on Ukraine comes as U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed frustration with Moscow's ongoing attacks on its neighbor.

Trump, who initially took a more conciliatory tone toward Russia as he tried to end the more than three-year war in Ukraine, has threatened to start imposing tariffs and other measures if Moscow shows no progress toward ending the conflict by August 8.

The president said last month the U.S. would supply weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but did not indicate how this would be done.

NATO countries, Ukraine, and the United States are developing a new mechanism that will focus on getting U.S. weapons to Ukraine from the Priority Ukraine Requirements List, known under the acronym PURL, the sources said.

Ukraine would prioritize the weapons it needs in tranches of roughly $500 million, and NATO allies - coordinated by NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte - would then negotiate among themselves who would donate or pay for items on the list.

Through this approach, NATO allies hope to provide $10 billion in arms for Ukraine, said a European official, speaking on condition of anonymity. It was unclear over what timeframe they hope to supply the arms.

"That is the starting point, and it's an ambitious target that we're working towards. We're currently on that trajectory. We support the ambition. We need that sort of volume," the European official said.

A senior NATO military official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said the initiative was "a voluntary effort coordinated by NATO that all allies are encouraged to take part in".

The official said the new scheme included a NATO holding account, where allies could deposit money for weapons for Ukraine, approved by NATO's top military commander.

NATO headquarters in Brussels declined to comment. The White House, Pentagon, and Ukrainian embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment.

Russian forces are gradually advancing against Ukraine, and control one-fifth of Ukraine's territory.

FASTER ARMS RESTOCKING

If a NATO country decides to donate weapons to Ukraine, the mechanism would allow that country to effectively bypass lengthy U.S. arms sales procedures to replenish its own stocks, said one U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Money for the arms would be transferred into a U.S.-held account, possibly at the U.S. Treasury Department, or to an escrow fund, although the exact structure remains unclear, the official said.

The new mechanism would be in addition to the United States' own effort to identify arms from U.S. stockpiles to send to Ukraine under the Presidential Drawdown Authority, which allows the U.S. president to draw from current weapons stocks to help allies in an emergency.

At least one tranche of weapons for Ukraine is currently being negotiated under the new mechanism, two sources said, though it was unclear if any money has yet been transferred.

Trump's fellow Republicans in Congress have introduced legislation, known as the PEACE Act, that aims to create a fund at the U.S. Treasury in which allies can deposit money that would pay to replenish U.S. military equipment donated to Ukraine.

Ukraine's needs remain consistent with previous months - air defenses, interceptors, systems, rockets, and artillery.

he last statement of need from Ukraine came in a July 21 video conference of the country's allies, known as the Ramstein group, now led by Britain and Germany.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/us-nato-developing-novel-funding-182729664.html

China Slams US Decision To Sanction Palestinian Officials: 'Shock, Disappointment'

 Via The Cradle

China expressed "shock" and "disappointment" on Friday over the US decision to impose sanctions on the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) the day before. 

"We feel disappointed at, and can't understand the US move," said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun, adding that the question of Palestine "is at the heart of the Middle East issue."

Jiakun also described the Palestinian struggle as "a matter of international fairness and justice," while urging Washington to move toward "taking responsibility" for implementing UN resolutions on Palestine. He stressed that the Palestinian issue is at a "crucial and historic juncture."

Getty Images

"China firmly supports the just cause of the Palestinian people in restoring their national rights (and) the PA’s effective jurisdiction overall of Palestine’s territory, including the Gaza Strip and the West Bank," he added, calling on Washington to "not do the reverse." He went on to say that a two-state solution is the "comprehensive, just, and lasting solution."

The US announced the imposition of sanctions on the PA and PLO on 31 July, accusing them of undermining peace efforts. Those targeted by the sanctions will be slapped with visa denials. It did not name who exactly was being sanctioned. 

"It is in our national security interests to impose consequences and hold the PLO and PA accountable for not complying with their commitments and undermining the prospects for peace," the US State Department stated. 

Washington called out the PA for "taking actions to internationalize" the conflict with Israel, including through the International Criminal Court (ICC). It also accused Ramallah of "supporting terrorism."

The PA was formed after the 1993 Oslo Accords between Israel and the PLO – led at the time by Yasser Arafat. The agreement was meant to pave the way for eventual Palestinian statehood, and saw the PLO abandon armed resistance against Israel. 

The years that followed saw Israel rapidly expand illegal settlements and solidify its illegal occupation of the West Bank. 

The PA, for years, provided stipends to the families of Palestinians (often those responsible for attacks) killed or jailed by Israel. Washington and Tel Aviv accused the PA of supporting terrorism – and in February this year, Ramallah revoked the stipend law in line with US and Israeli demands

The PA has been at the center of efforts to set in place a solution for post-war Gaza. While Israel continues to reject Ramallah’s return to governing the strip, Arab states have been pushing the idea of a reformed PA assuming power in Gaza and sidelining Hamas. 

Washington has also called on the PA to launch reforms, among them revoking the stipend law. 

Hussein al-Sheikh, the secretary-general of the PLO Executive Committee and close confidant of PA President Mahmoud Abbas, was appointed as Vice President of the State of Palestine on April 26.

The move was meant to represent a PA leadership reform, but was strongly criticized by several Palestinian factions as illegitimate. 

China has played a role in mediating between Palestinian factions, including Hamas and the PA Fatah party, with the goal of reaching a consensus on dealing with the issue of post-war Gaza. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/china-slams-us-decision-sanction-palestinian-officials-shock-disappointment

Primary Care Physicians Increasingly Leave US Medicare

 A new analysis of fee-for-service Medicare claims shows a sharper rise in primary care physicians leaving the federal health program than in specialists, raising concerns about older adults’ access to care.

An estimated 4.4% of primary care physicians enrolled in Medicare left the program in 2023, up from 3.3% in 2014, according to researchers Hannah T. Neprash, PhD, of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and Michael E. Chernew, PhD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, writing in JAMA Health Forum.

By comparison, the share of physicians in surgical specialties who exited Medicare rose from 2.3% to 3.0% over the same period. Exit for hospital-based specialties held steady at 3.5%, while those for other medical specialties remained at 2.5%. (There were temporary spikes across all specialties in 2020 and 2021, likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but these subsided.)

Neprash and Chernew analyzed Medicare Part B claims from 2010 to 2024 for services provided by physicians. To avoid conflating permanent exits with sporadic billing, they excluded physicians who averaged fewer than 100 Medicare claims annually.

Possible reasons for the exits include the greater burden of new communication methods like online messaging and demands for clinical documentation, the authors noted.

Neprash also told Medscape Medical News that some of the apparent exits from traditional Medicare may reflect a shift to caring primarily for patients enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans.

The study’s limitations include its reliance on Medicare fee-for-service claims, which does not capture physician participation in Medicare Advantage. The analysis also does not distinguish between physicians who left Medicare and those who retired or exited clinical practice. Physician entry was also not accounted for, so changes in the overall physician workforce could not be fully assessed.

Still, the research raises important concerns about the future supply of primary care clinicians. “This research opens more questions than it answers,” Neprash said.

Physician Fee Schedule Shakeup?

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) has repeatedly urged rebalancing Medicare’s payment rates, arguing that current models undervalue the work of primary care physicians compared with specialists.

“Compensation remained much lower for primary care physicians ($296,000) than for most specialists in 2023 (eg, $496,000 for surgical specialties) — a disparity that may help explain why the share of physicians pursuing primary care in the US has been declining,” MedPAC noted in its March 2025 Report to Congress.

Direct Primary Care and Medicare Participation

Despite these challenges, Medicare beneficiaries may still have more stable access to primary care clinicians than younger populations.

MedPAC in its March report cited a 2024 survey showing that 11% of people enrolled in Medicare were searching for new primary care clinicians compared with 16% of individuals covered by private insurance. Among those searching, 52% of Medicare beneficiaries reported difficulty finding a new provider compared with 66% of those with private insurance.

Interest in concierge medicine as well as direct primary care has been rising. These practices generally forgo insurance billing, instead charging patients set monthly or annual fees for access to services — offering both administrative simplicity for clinicians and price transparency for patients.

Some of the physician exits from Medicare reported by Neprash and Chernew may reflect growing participation in direct primary care.

Patients enrolled in Medicare can still see physicians in direct primary care practices as long as they are willing to pay the membership fees out of pocket. Physicians in direct primary care can continue to order tests, make referrals, and write prescriptions covered by Medicare — as long as they remain registered in the Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS).

“As long as the physician keeps their PECOS number active, then Medicare will honor their orders, as long as they’re a licensed practicing physician,” said Jeffrey Davenport, MD, president of the Direct Primary Care Alliance and a direct primary care physician in Edmond, Oklahoma.

Physicians who formally opt out of Medicare face a 2-year wait period before they can re-enroll.

Davenport transitioned to direct primary care in 2012, citing the appeal of a membership model and lower overhead costs.

Davenport called the shift a “win” for both himself and his patients. He now handles minor procedures like stitches during office visits, sparing patients unnecessary emergency room trips. He also takes on fewer patients and spends more time with them during office visits.

“The patients love the service and love the ability to create a rapport and get to know their doctor,” Davenport said. “My life is better. I have more time to take care of the patients.”

Neprash reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures during the conduct of the study. Chernew reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures during the conduct of the study; receiving personal fees from LRVHealth, VBID Health, Waymark, Inc., and MITRE outside the submitted work; and serving on the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Advisory Board, Blue Health Intelligence Advisory Board, Health Care Cost Institute Board, National Institute for Health Care Management Advisory Board, Congressional Budget Office’s Panel of Health Advisers, Massachusetts Health Connector, MedPAC, and Aledade Advisory Council outside the submitted work.

Davenport reported having no financial relationships.

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/primary-care-physicians-increasingly-leave-us-medicare-2025a1000kbl