Search This Blog

Friday, September 5, 2025

The Grifters' Lament

 by James Howard Kunstler,

"We are the sickest country in the world. That's why we have to fire people at the CDC ... They did not do their job! This was their job to keep us healthy!"

- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

What a gruesome spectacle it was to see HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. take on a conclave of vicious grifters on the Senate Finance Committee straining to warp reality in defense of their mighty patron, the nation-wrecking pharmaceutical companies.

Do you understand how deep, convoluted, and grave the political sickness is?

Over the years, the public health agencies and “big pharma” had evolved into a symbiotic vector driving the nation into chronic illness. They allowed the population to poison themselves on a diet of corn syrup, engineered snack foods, and chemical additives. Result: epidemic obesity, diabetes, and many other illnesses. To counter that, they dosed everybody to-the-max with sketchily-tested pharma products while the agency employees raked in royalties and pharma got a get-outa-jail-free card in the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) — legal liability cancelled.

Then, they all badly mis-stepped, conniving in the Covid-19 operation, a still poorly-comprehended scheme to punk the American people and enable mail-in ballot fraud to steal the 2020 election. First, there was Dr. Fauci’s years’ long effort to hatch a novel corona virus, Covid-19, in labs here and overseas. Then, there was the opportune release of the virus in 2019. Then, the pharma response to the virus: a “miracle” mRNA vaccine that was likely already developed in secret, even before Operation Warp Speed was acted-out to pretend that pharma just came up with it. And, of course, there was President Trump 1.0 getting hosed by his Covid Response Team (Fauci, Birx, et al.) on all this.

Thus, you have that battery of US Senators all paid handsomely by Pharma to defend the industry with hysterical obfuscation against the lone figure, Mr. Kennedy, striving to correct all that fantastic corruption. He retorted to their malign nonsense honorably, revealing their conflicts of interest, their cupidity, the bales of dollars paid by pharma to the likes of Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and the rest over the years, and their longstanding silence on the afore-mentioned poisoning and drugging of America.

Incidentally, to understand how this grift got so exorbitant, look to the unfortunate 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (558 U.S. 310). In a 5-4 ruling (by majority conservative justices, then including Alito, Thomas, and Scalia), SCOTUS decided that previous prohibitions on corporate money in election campaigns were unconstitutional because corporations enjoy legal status as persons, that is, as citizens, and giving money to election campaigns is a form of free speech under the first Amendment, which can’t be abridged by any law.

And so, the spigot opened on vast fortunes laid on politicians by corporations seeking to protect their interests. If anything went to warp speed, it was the Beltway lobbying industry. The Citizens United decision was a singular tragedy for our country. The legal reasoning behind it was specious because corporations, unlike real human citizens, do not have duties, obligations, and responsibilities to the nation, entailed in their citizenship. Rather, corporations have duties, obligations, and responsibilities solely (and explicitly in law) to their shareholders, whose interests are not necessarily consistent with the public interest. Why has no one noticed this?

Well, they haven’t and that is exactly where American politics went badly off-the-rails. The resulting accelerated corruption in the public health agencies of our government has been a disgusting side effect of all that, which RFK, Jr., has been called to clean up, a Herculean task. The most visible manifestation of that corruption is the chronic illness of the people — 76.4 percent of all of us, he told the committee, with eight out of ten young men physically unfit for military service. We’re the sickest nation in the world.

When the senators confabulate over “the science,” what they really mean is the armature of medical authority that has enabled the money-flow to their campaign committees (and eventually to their own bank accounts.) It’s that very scaffold of authority that has collapsed. Why? Because the medical authorities lied over and over about the Covid-19 episode, and especially about the vaccines, which were never properly tested, and were neither safe nor effective.

Your own doctors got paid extravagantly to push the vaccine. The so-called Pfizer Papers, collected, collated, and analyzed by Naomi Wolf’s organization (because nobody else would do it) showed the sloppiness of the whole process behind the vaccines’ development and release, and the pharma companies’ evasion of responsibility for the damage done. The medical journals lied about everything from the origin of the virus to the efficacy of the vaccine. The CDC campaigned against viable, inexpensive treatments for the virus. The CDC pushed the worthless, gamed PCR tests to jack up the case numbers. The CDC pushed the idiotic mask rules, school closings, business closures, and the vaccine mandates. The hospitals killed people with remdesivir and respirators, and got paid for it! The authority of all these parties is blown, especially the CDC’s — and these perfidious senators have the gall to hide behind this “science”?

What Mr. Kennedy is challenged with is sorting through all the official lies told by these agencies — the so-called “data” — to arrive at a comprehensible picture of what really happened. And then to inquire beyond Covid into many other pharma products that might be making Americans sick. Neither the politicians nor the people employed by the agencies when Covid went down want that to happen.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/grifters-lament

Hysterectomy, Ovaries Removal Linked to Stroke Risk

 

  • Previous meta-analyses examining the association between hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy and stroke risk have had mixed results.
  • This meta-analysis showed that hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy were associated with an increased risk of stroke.
  • The authors suggested that women who undergo these surgeries should be closely monitored for early signs of stroke.

Hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy were associated with an increased risk of stroke, according to a meta-analysis.

Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and 15 other studies, hysterectomy was shown to be associated with a higher stroke risk compared with no hysterectomy (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, P=0.001), reported Nan Wu, MD, of Chongqing General Hospital and Chongqing University in China, and colleagues.

This was also the case for bilateral oophorectomy compared with no bilateral oophorectomy, regardless of hysterectomy status (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09-1.17, P<0.001), they noted in Menopauseopens in a new tab or window.

With no hysterectomy as the reference, subgroup analyses by surgical indication showed a significant association between hysterectomy and a higher stroke risk for benign indications (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, P=0.001) but not benign/malignant indications (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92-1.20, P=0.454). When stratified by ovarian conservation status, there was an elevated stroke risk in women with ovarian conservation (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P=0.01) and those with bilateral oophorectomy (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10-1.27, P<0.001).

"The high prevalence of this intervention necessitates comprehensive evaluation of its long-term health consequences," wrote Wu and colleagues. "The current study indicates that hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy are associated with an increased risk of stroke, underscoring that women who have had these surgeries should be closely monitored and require proactive preventive health measures for early signs of stroke."

As for the biological mechanisms that may play a role here, the authors noted that these surgeries can lead to estrogen loss that impairs cardiovascular protection, and can result in "harmful hemorheologic changes."

Research has shown that hysterectomy induces menopausal transition, while postmenopausal iron dysregulation accelerates atherosclerosis, they pointed out. "Hysterectomy -- especially when performed abdominally -- can provoke a systemic inflammatory response, contributing to endothelial dysfunction."

Previous meta-analysesopens in a new tab or window examining the association between hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy and stroke risk have had mixed resultsopens in a new tab or window, the authors said.

"Future prospective studies with a large sample size and longer follow-up period are needed to address the disparities of type of stroke, age at surgery, surgical techniques, and menopause status on the association between stroke risk and hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy," Wu and colleagues concluded.

Looking at the unweighted NHANES data from 1999-2018 alone showed that hysterectomy was not significantly associated with mortality from stroke (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.89-1.85). This cohort included 21,240 women (representing 85.9 million U.S. women) with a median of 8.3 years of follow-up and 193 stroke-related deaths.

The 15 cohort studies, published between 2009 and 2023, included more than 2 million women and examined fatal strokes as well as non-fatal strokes.

Study limitations included possible residual confounding due to issues such as drug use, education, and socioeconomic factors.

Disclosures

Trump Admin Investigates Medicaid Spending on Immigrants in Dem States

 The Trump administration is taking its immigration crackdown

opens in a new tab or window to the healthcare safety net, launching Medicaid spending probes in at least six Democratic-led states that provide comprehensive health coverage to poor and disabled immigrants living in the U.S. without permanent legal status.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is scouring payments covering healthcare for immigrants without legal status to ensure there isn't any waste, fraud, or abuse, according to public records obtained by KFF Health News and the Associated Press. While acknowledging that states can bill the federal government for Medicaid emergency and pregnancy care for immigrants without legal status, federal officials have sent letters notifying state health agencies in California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington that they are reviewing federal and state payments for medical services, such as prescription drugs and specialty care.

The federal agency told the states it is reviewing claims as part of its commitment to maintain Medicaid's fiscal integrity. California is the biggest target after the state self-reported overcharging the federal government for healthcare services delivered to immigrants without legal status, determined to be at least $500 millionopens in a new tab or window, spurring the threat of a lawsuit.

"If CMS determines that California is using federal money to pay for or subsidize healthcare for individuals without a satisfactory immigration status for which federal funding is prohibited by law," according to a letter dated March 18, "CMS will diligently pursue all available enforcement strategies, including, consistent with applicable law, reductions in federal financial participation and possible referrals to the Attorney General of the United States for possible lawsuit against California."

The investigations come as the White House and a Republican-controlled Congress slashed taxpayer spending on immigrant healthcare through cutsopens in a new tab or window in President Donald Trump's spending-and-tax law passed this summer. The administration is also pushing peopleopens in a new tab or window living in the U.S. illegally off Medicaid rolls. Health policy experts say these moves could hamper care and leave safety net hospitals, clinics, and other providers financially vulnerableopens in a new tab or window. Some Democratic-led states -- California, Illinois, and Minnesotaopens in a new tab or window -- have already had to end or slim down their Medicaid programs for immigrants due to ballooning costs. Colorado is also considering cuts due to cost overruns.

At the same time, 20 states are pushing back on Trump's immigration crackdown by suing the administrationopens in a new tab or window for handing over Medicaidopens in a new tab or window data on millions of enrollees to deportation officials. A federal judge temporarily haltedopens in a new tab or window the move. California's attorney general, Rob Bonta, who led that challenge, says the Trump administration is launching a political attack on states that embrace immigrants in Medicaid programs.

"The whole idea that there's waste, fraud, and abuse is contrived," Bonta said. "It's manufactured. It's invented. It's a catchall phrase that they use to justify their predetermined anti-immigrant agenda."

Trump Administration Targets Immigrants

Immigrants lacking permanent legal status are not eligible to enroll in comprehensive Medicaid coverage. However, states bill the federal government for emergency and pregnancy care provided to anyone.

Fourteen states and Washington, D.C.opens in a new tab or window, expanded their Medicaid programs with their own funds to cover low-income children without legal status. Seven of those states, plus Washington, D.C., have also provided full-scope coverage to some adult immigrants living in the country illegally.

The Trump administration appears to be targeting only states with full Medicaid coverage for both kids and adults without legal status. Utah, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, which provide Medicaid coverage only to immigrant childrenopens in a new tab or window, have not received letters, for instance. CMS declined to provide a full list of states it is targeting.

Federal officials say it is their legal right and responsibility to scrutinize states for misspending on immigrant health coverage and are taking "decisive action to stop that."

"It is a matter of national concern that some states have pushed the boundaries of Medicaid law to offer extensive benefits to individuals unlawfully present in the United States," CMS spokesperson Catherine Howden said about the agency's probe of selected states. The oversight is intended to "ensure federal funds are reserved for legally eligible individuals, not for political experiments that violate the law," she said.

Health policy researchers and economists say providing Medicaid coverage to immigrants for preventive services and treatment of chronic health conditions staves off more costly care for patients down the road. It also tamps down insurance premium increases and the amount of uncompensated care for hospitals and clinics.

Francisco Silva, president and CEO of the California Primary Care Associationopens in a new tab or window, said the Trump administration is threatening to drive up healthcare costs and make it more difficult to access care.

"The impact is emergency rooms would get so crowded that ambulances have to be diverted away and people in a real emergency can't get into the hospital, and public health threats like disease outbreaks," Silva said.

California has taken a healthcare-for-all approachopens in a new tab or window, providing coverage to 1.6 million immigrants without legal status. The expansion, which was rolled out from 2016 to 2024, is estimated to cost $12.4 billion this year. Of that, $1.3 billion is paid by the federal government for emergency and pregnancy-related care.

As California rolled out its expansion, the state erroneously billed the federal government for care provided to immigrants without legal status -- details that have not previously been reported and that former state officials shared with KFF Health News and the AP. The state improperly billed for services such as mental health and addiction services, prescription drugs, and dental care.

Jacey Cooper, who served as California's Medicaid director from 2020 to 2023, said she discovered the error and reported it to federal regulators. Cooper said the state had been working to pay back at least $500 million identified by the federal government.

"Once I identified the problem, I thought it was really important to report it and we did," Cooper said. "We take waste, fraud, and abuse very seriously."

It's not clear whether that money has been repaid. The state's Medicaid agency says it does not know how CMS calculated the overpayments or "what is included in that amount, what time period it covers, and if or when it was collected," said spokesperson Tony Cava.

California has an enormously complicated Medicaid program: It serves the largest population in the nation -- nearly 15 million peopleopens in a new tab or window -- with a budget of nearly $200 billionopens in a new tab or window this fiscal year.

Matt Salo, a national Medicaid expert, said these types of mistakes happen in states throughout the country because the program is rife with overlapping federal and state rules. Salo and other policy analysts agreed that states have the authority to administer their Medicaid programs as they see fit and root out misuse of federal funds.

And Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Trump administration's actions "persecute a minority that's unpopular with the powers that be."

"The Trump administration cannot maintain that this effort has anything to do with maintaining the fiscal integrity of the Medicaid program," Cannon said. "There are so much bigger threats to Medicaid's fiscal integrity, that that argument just doesn't wash."

Immigrants' Medicaid Under Attack

National Republicans have targeted health spending on immigrants in different ways. The GOP spending law, which Trump calls the "One Big Beautiful Bill," will lower reimbursement to states around the countryopens in a new tab or window in October 2026. In California, for example, federal reimbursement for immigrants without legal status will go to 50% for emergency services, down from 90% for the Medicaid expansion population, according to Cava.

The Trump administration is also scaling back Medicaid coverage to immigrants with temporary legal status who were previously covered and announced in Augustopens in a new tab or window that it would provide states with monthly reports pointing out enrollees whose legal status could not be confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security.

"Every dollar misspent is a dollar taken away from an eligible, vulnerable individual in need of Medicaid," CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz, MD, said in a statement. "This action underscores our unwavering commitment to program integrity, safeguarding taxpayer dollars, and ensuring benefits are strictly reserved for those eligible under the law."

States under review say they are following the law.

"Spending money on a congressionally authorized medical benefit program that helps people get emergency treatments for cancer, dialysis, and anti-rejection medications for organ transplants is decidedly not waste, fraud, and abuse," said Mike Faulk, deputy communications director for Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown.

Records show Washington Medicaid officials have been inundated with questions from CMS about federal payments covering emergency and pregnancy care for immigrants without legal status.

Emails show Illinois officials met with CMS and sought an extension to share its data. CMS denied that request and federal regulators told the state that its funding could be withheld.

"Thousands of Illinois residents rely on these programs to lawfully seek critical healthcare without fear of deportation," said Melissa Kula, a spokesperson for the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services, noting that any federal cut would be "impossible" for the state to backfill.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/medicaid/117327

'Vaccine Makers to Study Rare Post-Vax Syndrome, Spike Persistence After COVID Shot'

 In an unusual move, the FDA asked vaccine makers to conduct randomized studies evaluating possible long-term effects of the COVID-19 shot, including spike persistence and post-vaccination syndrome symptoms.

In the approval letteropens in a new tab or window for the latest versionopens in a new tab or window of the Pfizer (Comirnaty) COVID-19 vaccine, the FDA requested an exploratory, placebo-controlled study to assess whether circulating SARS-COV-2 spike antigen persisted and whether self-reported symptoms of post-COVID-19 vaccination syndrome or long COVID emerged at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 in vaccine and control arms.

In decisional memosopens in a new tab or window for the updated Moderna (Spikevax, mNexspike) and Novavax (Nuvaxovid) shots, the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Director Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, outlined why the CBER Office of the Director (OCD) requested this kind of post-marketing commitment.

"First, there is growing clinical evidence that spike protein which is generated as a result of, or in the course of, vaccination may persist for some time in a subset of individuals," Prasad wrote.

"Second, the symptoms of long COVID or the post-acute COVID syndrome are ill-defined but concern many Americans. Third, there is a fraction of people (note: this does not include CBER OCD) who believe there is a link between these two," he continued.

"As such, CBER OCD believes it has an obligation to Americans to request the Applicant generate information which may link or exculpate any such relationship. If a real, positive association is present in randomized fashion, it would constitute a concerning finding," Prasad added.

"CBER OCD also notes that this substudy design may also be able to adjudicate if annual COVID-19 vaccines reduce long COVID symptoms, a claim that FDA has never permitted the applicant to make, depending on power."

Earlier this year, a small studyopens in a new tab or window identified potential immunologic patterns associated with post-vaccination syndrome, a very rare condition with neurologic symptoms that occurs in some people following a COVID-19 vaccine.

In findings posted in February on the preprint server medRxivopens in a new tab or window without peer-review, Akiko Iwasaki, PhD, of Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and colleagues noted a small fraction of the population reported a chronic debilitating condition after COVID-19 vaccination that is often referred to as post-vaccination syndrome.

The immune cell populations of people with post-vaccination syndrome were different from healthy controls, Iwasaki and co-authors noted.

A subset of post-vaccination syndrome patients also had higher levels of circulating spike protein in their blood, they showed. Detectable levels of the S1 subunit of the spike protein were seen in plasma up to 709 days after the most recent known exposure.

In 2023,opens in a new tab or window a surveyopens in a new tab or window led by Harlan Krumholz, MD, also of Yale, suggested that people who experienced rare long-term adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination often had neurologic symptoms.

Of 241 survey participants who self-reported a post-vaccination syndrome, the five most common symptoms were exercise intolerance (71%), excessive fatigue (69%), numbness (63%), brain fog (63%), and neuropathy (63%). The survey data were posted on medRxivopens in a new tab or window and have not been peer-reviewed.

Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after COVID vaccination also include a variety of neurologic and systemic manifestations, Krumholz and co-authors noted at the time.

These symptoms may share mechanisms with post-COVID complications, they observed. "Importantly, immune-mediated neurological adverse events post-vaccination are rare and often less severe than those that follow actual infection," they wrote.

Large observational studies from researchers in Norwayopens in a new tab or window and othersopens in a new tab or window suggested that COVID-19 vaccines may prevent long COVID symptoms or reduce symptom severity. Data from the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairsopens in a new tab or window also indicated that lower long COVID rates may be attributable in part to vaccines.

The CDC recommended vaccination to preventopens in a new tab or window long COVID.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/generalneurology/117311

New York governor issues order to bypass Trump administration's COVID vaccine limits

 

New York Governor Kathy Hochul Issues Executive Order to Override Trump Administration's COVID Vaccine Limits

HHS spox on autism report: until final release, claims on contents nothing but speculation

 HHS spokesperson to CNBC on forthcoming autism report - until we release final reportclaims about its contents are nothing more than speculation.

https://www.streetinsider.com/Trader+Talk/HHS+spokesperson+to+CNBC+on+forthcoming+autism+report+-+until+we+release+final+report%2C+claims+about+its+contents+are+nothing+more+than+speculation/25303063.html

Virtue-signaling Norway fund divests from Israel — but showers cash on China, Qatar

 by Charles Gasparino

The world’s largest sovereign wealth fund has been busy divesting from Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East – but it has no problem plowing cash into some of the world’s worst dictatorships, On The Money has learned.

Norges Bank Investment Management, which manages the vast assets of oil-rich Norway, has around $2 trillion in assets, making it a market powerhouse.

In recent weeks, Norges has chosen to unwind investments in 11 Israeli companies and canceled follow-through plans to invest in five more. It even divested from the US company Caterpillar because Israel uses its bulldozers to clean up the rubble from the war in Gaza.

Last week, Norges chose to unwind investments in 11 Israeli companies and canceled follow-through plans to invest in five more. It even divested from Caterpillar.Jack Forbes / NY Post Design

Yet, these niggling Norwegian virtue signalers have no problem propping up businesses in despotic regimes that include China, Qatar and Turkey.

According to its latest annual report, Norges has made significant investments in the place that’s imprisoning the Uyghur minority and runs the world’s largest surveillance state, China.

It also has holdings in Russian companies. A country, last time I checked, continues to bomb civilian targets in its war of aggression against Ukraine.

A fund spokeswoman says those investments have been frozen since 2022 when the conflict began and are now being divested. Still, Qatar is also on its investment list despite harboring Hamas’ political arm.
Turkey, meanwhile, has a history of human rights abuses going back to the Armenian genocide and continuing today with oppression of its Kurdish minority. Nonetheless, the fund listed nearly six dozen investments in the country.

The Norwegians can do what they want with their money, but the hypocrisy is mind-boggling. Consider: The fund’s outside advisors, its so-called Independent Council on Ethics that makes ethical investment recommendations, has opened investigations into more Israeli companies for alleged abuse of its warped standards than any other country in the world except the United States.

Norway Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store. Divesting from Israel is seen as a way to shore-up Store’s fragile hold on power.NTB/AFP via Getty Images

I asked a spokeswoman for the Norwegian fund about these disconnects – doing all this business with Turkey and China, while holding Israel and the US to the highest of standards — and here’s what she had to say: “We are a financial investor with one target: To create the highest possible return. The fund is strictly non‑political, with all companies — regardless of country — assessed according to the same ethical criteria by an independent Council on Ethics. Decisions are made impartially based on those recommendations.”

Despite being a major energy producer, Norway through its fund is known for its woke investment strategies, a fealty to the largely discredited Environmental Social Governance money management theory that directs money to businesses that adopt progressive political positions such as ineffective green energy boondoggles, and Diversity Equity and Inclusion hiring practices critics say are a form of discrimination.

Now that the progressive movement has adopted being anti-Israel as a key plank, the fund is framing its divestment from Israeli companies as necessary because of the continued loss of civilian life from the Gaza conflict.

Now that the progressive movement has adopted being anti-Israel as a key plank, the fund is framing its divestment from Israeli companies as necessary because of the continued loss of civilian life from the Gaza conflict. Gaza City, above.AFP via Getty Images

In making its decision to divest last week, Norges said it believes Israel’s conduct following the massacre of more than 1,200 by Hamas terrorists represents an “unacceptable risk that the companies contribute to serious violations of the rights of individuals in situations of war and conflict.”

However, there is also a political element at work. Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store is now the head of the minority Labour Party government. On Monday, parliamentary elections begin that will determine his party’s fate. Divesting from Israel is seen as a way to shore-up Store’s fragile hold on power because beating up on Israel and its biggest supporter, the US, has been a favorite pastime of the global elite for years. Just doing some research on the activities of the UN, its anti-American and anti-Israel denouncements have been front and center of its agenda for decades.

That has become even more evident now as Israel looks to right the wrong of Oct. 7, free the remaining hostages and eliminate what’s left of Hamas.

I never knew Norway harbored such sentiments, but I do now, as it has joined the divestment movement that will certainly earn it plaudits at the UN or among the Israel haters on our college campuses.

Yes, you can have real problems with the ongoing conflict in Gaza and children losing their lives, but also recognize it’s a complex situation made even more dire by the stranglehold terrorist lunatics like Hamas have over the Palestinian people.

I guess it’s ethical in Norway to do business with China with its long record of human rights abuses, but unethical to do business with Israel, which has been responding to the largest mass slaughter of Jewish civilians since the holocaust.

https://nypost.com/2025/09/05/business/virtue-signaling-norway-fund-divests-from-israel-but-showers-cash-on-china-russia/