Search This Blog

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

23 hantavirus cruise passengers return home to ‘all corners,’ including US, one already sick

 At least 23 passengers from the hantavirus-infected cruise ship MV Hondius have already left the boat and returned home, including to the US, according to a shocking new report — and one of them has already gotten sick.

The travelers did not realize that they had been exposed to the deadly virus — which has a mortality rate of up to 40% — when they left the expedition vessel during its stop at Saint Helena, a tiny island in the South Atlantic, on April 23, according to a passenger who is still aboard the ship.

“There are 23 people wandering around there, and until three days ago, no one had contacted them,” the passenger told Spanish newspaper El Pais.

Nearly two dozen MV Hondius passengers ditched the voyage and headed back to their home countries almost two weeks ago, a cruiser claimed Wednesday.AFP via Getty Images

“The Australian went back to Australia, the one from Taiwan to Taiwan, the Americans to all corners of North America. The Englishman to England, the Dutch to their homes… I don’t remember the rest.”

One of those passengers, a Swiss man who had returned home with his wife, tested positive for hantavirus on Wednesday, authorities said. 

The man was initially taken to a Zurich hospital and tested negative for the virus – which can lie dormant for up to eight weeks. 

He was apparently just one of many expedition passengers who decided to hit the road during the Dutch vessel’s two-day stop in the British territory last month.

The passengers were only informed of the terrifying virus outbreak days ago, according to the traveler who spoke to El Pais.

Argentine investigators now believe a Dutch couple who died from hantavirus likely brought it on board after becoming infected during a bird-watching tour in Uishuaia, Argentina.NY Post Design

The disease usually spreads by contact with mouse or rat feces or urine — but the World Health Organization suspects that the Dutch cruise liner carries a rare strain that spreads human-to-human.

The passenger claimed that the WHO didn’t begin contacting the escapees until three days ago, despite the first passenger getting sick on April 6.

That patient, a 70-year-old Dutchman, died on April 11 — almost two weeks before the Saint Helena stop.

In Saint Helena, his ill wife disembarked with his body — and nearly two-dozen other passengers.

The WHO said Wednesday that the ship’s operating company, Oceanwide Expeditions, had recently emailed departed passengers about the outbreak that had overtaken the ship, but didn’t specify when that communication began.

“International contact tracing is ongoing. Passengers who disembarked from the ship were informed of the hantavirus case by the ships’ operators and asked to report any signs and symptoms,” a WHO representative told The Post in a statement, adding that this is how they learned of the case confirmed in Switzerland.

A third passenger has died and at least eight others have become sick with the virus while onboard the 353-foot vessel.@DrTedros/X

“Working with national authorities and the ship’s operators, our teams have built a list of who was where when, in order to ensure that any potential exposure is documented and people can get help if they develop symptoms,” the rep said. “This contact tracing also helps to contain any potential spread.”

An Oceanwide Expeditions spokesperson said company officials were “currently working on details of passengers and crew who embarked and disembarked on the various legs of the voyage.”

But the passenger believed their efforts were too little, too late.

“We were in touch with them and kept asking ourselves, ‘When are they going to tell them something?’ Some people weren’t contacted until yesterday,” they reportedly said.

The deceased Dutchman’s wife, who also disembarked in Saint Helena, later succumbed to the virus at a Johannesburg hospital. 

Argentine investigators now believe the couple was responsible for bringing the virus onboard, after picking it up from rodents while visiting a landfill during a bird-watching tour in the city of Ushuaia days before the ship departed from the Argentine port on March 20.

On Wednesday, three patients believed to be infected with the virus were evacuated from the ship and taken to receive medical attention in the Netherlands.AP

However, authorities previously said that the area and the surrounding province of Tierra del Fuego had never recorded a case of the hantavirus.

Though usually spread through rat droppings, the WHO said a rare strain of hantavirus that can spread between people and carries an alarming 40% mortality rate — the Andes virus – is the culprit behind the Hondius outbreak.

A third passenger has died and at least eight others have become sick with the virus while onboard the 353-foot vessel, which remains anchored off Cape Verde while waiting to port in the Canary Islands. 

On Wednesday, three patients – a 56-year-old British national, a 41-year-old Dutch citizen and a 65-year-old German – believed to be infected with the virus were evacuated from the ship and taken to receive medical attention in the Netherlands.

The passengers, two of whom are believed to be seriously ill, were evacuated in order to receive medical care in the Netherlands, the WHO said.

Eerie photos showed at least one of the patients wearing head-to-toe protective gear on a gurney as they were removed from an ambulance and escorted to a waiting jet at the port in Cape Verde’s capital city, Praia. 

Among those evacuated was the ship’s doctor, who was once in “serious condition” but has improved, Spain’s health ministry said.

The passengers and crew members still left on the ship aren’t showing any symptoms of the virus, which is typically contracted from inhaling infected rodent droppings, according to officials. 

The unnerving development came as the WHO and Oceanwide Expeditions maintained the ship will port and disembark in Tenerife – though that possibility was reportedly a source of tense debate between Spanish authorities.  

Fernando Clavijo, the incumbent president of the Canary Islands, told reporters Wednesday that his government has not received detailed information on how the process will be carried out – and raised fears that passengers could spread the hantavirus to citizens. 

Reps for Spain’s central government have blasted his remarks as “irresponsible,” as health officials have said the risk of spreading hantavirus is very low, and given the fact there are 14 Spanish nationals on board, El Pais reported.

https://nypost.com/2026/05/06/world-news/23-hantavirus-cruise-passengers-already-returned-home-including-to-the-us/

'Sanofi asks to pull Tzield bid from FDA's controversial CNPV program'

 Since it was established nearly a year ago by the FDA, the Commissioner’s National Priority Voucher (CNPV) program has been steeped in controversy as a potential tool for government officials to curry favor and reward political allies in the biopharma industry.

Now Sanofi has asked that one of its applications be taken out of the fast-track program, according to a report from Stat.

The French pharma giant has requested that its application for expanded use of its diabetes drug Tzield be dropped from the CNPV track after the director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Tracy Beth Høeg, M.D., Ph.D., overturned a staff decision to approve the treatment, Stat reports, citing anonymous sources familiar with the discussions between the parties.

An April 21 decision date came and went for the application, with no complete response letter (CRL) issued. While Tzield last month won a separate green light, the potential expansion covered under the CNPV program was not decided on. 

Tzield was first approved in 2022 to delay the onset of stage 3 Type 1 diabetes in adults and children ages 8 and older whose disease are at stage 2. Then, roughly two weeks ago, the FDA cleared its use in children who were at least age 1.

The CNPV indication, meanwhile, concerns Tzield's potential use in kids ages 8 and older with stage 3 Type 1 diabetes, the stage at which a clinical diagnosis typically occurs, to slow disease progression.

When reached for comment, Sanofi declined to comment directly on its reported request to the FDA, citing confidential discussions with the agency.

“We are confident in the efficacy and safety profile of Tzield and we remain committed to working closely with the FDA throughout this review process,” a Sanofi spokesperson wrote in an emailed statement. 

A representative for the Department of Health and Human Services did not respond to Fierce's request for comment by publication time. 

It’s uncertain what impact it would have if the application were to be pulled from the program. Of the first wave of nine drugmakers who got CNPVs, Sanofi was among those who did not apply. The FDA nominated the company to receive one because its application addressed an unmet need, Sanofi said upon accepting the nomination in October of last year. 

The CNPV program aims to shorten the review process for products that align with "national interests" from the 10 to 12 months typically required for a standard review to just to 1 to 2 months.

In January, the FDA delayed its review of Tzield because of reports of two seizures and one death from blood clotting, according to Reuters. Since then, FDA staffers decided that the risks of treatment could be managed by labeling, Stat reported this week.

“Based on all available information, no causal relationship has been established between Tzield and the single case with a reported fatal outcome,” according to the Sanofi spokesperson. 

The spokesperson continued, “Over 1,000 patients have been treated with teplizumab over the course of 30 years of clinical development. Three cases of malignancies have been observed in these programs. In each of these cases, no causal relationship was established between the malignancies and teplizumab.”

https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/sanofi-requests-exit-controversial-cnpv-fast-track-program-stat

Musk to dissolve xAI, integrate it with SpaceX

 Tech mogul and the world's richest person Elon Musk announced on Wednesday that xAI will be dissolved as a separate company and merged with SpaceX.

"So it will just be SpaceXAI, the AI products from SpaceX," Musk briefly wrote on X. The news came only hours after xAI entered into a partnership with Anthropic, allowing the AI company to access xAI's supercomputer Colossus 1. Musk also said SpaceX would provide compute to other AI firms, providing they use their models for the betterment of all humanity.

xAI was formed in 2023, with Grok as its flagship generative AI model. The company's initial team consisted of engineers who had previously cooperated with OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Microsoft Research, and Tesla.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Musk-to-dissolve-xAI-integrate-it-with-SpaceX/66234790

Russia urges foreign diplomats to evacuate Kiev

 Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Wednesday urged foreign diplomatic missions in the Ukrainian capital, Kiev, to evacuate their personnel and citizens from the city, ahead of the Victory Day Parade in Moscow on May 9. The ministry repeated an earlier warning that Kiev will be directly targeted if Ukraine disrupts the celebrations on Saturday.

"We are not advocating aggression; we are advocating an inevitable response to aggression," Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova stated, accusing Western countries of ignoring what she referred to as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's threatening statements regarding the Victory Day manifestations in Moscow.

Moreover, Zakharova announced that Russia's diplomatic missions abroad are communicating the warning to their host nations, as well as international organizations.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Russia-urges-foreign-diplomats-to-evacuate-Kiev/66234609

World "Build" Around Hormuz; Japan Buys UAE Oil Bypassing Strait, ADNOC Spend $55B On Pipelines

 Long after the Iran war is just a bookmark in the history books, one distinct consequence will persist: much of the world, at least the part that does not fall under the Chinese sphere of influence, will do everything it can to avoid the Strait of Hormuz and failing that, have a Plan B. Just like when the Biden admin weaponized the US Dollar in 2022 by booting Russia from SWIFT after the Ukraine war, and in the process started the biggest gold and bitcoin rally in history as the rest of the world parked its savings in non-USD assets, so the world's most important oil choke point will never again be viewed again in the same way after Iran launched dozens of rockets at the ships transiting it. 

This shift in perception is what James Thorne, chief market strategist of WellingtonAltus, called "Iran’s Historic Mistake"; he explains it as follows: 

By weaponizing the Strait of Hormuz, Iran committed a strategic blunder of historic proportions. Tehran meant to punish America. Instead, it exposed every power built on imported energy, vulnerable sea lanes, and the delusion that globalization repealed geography. China is exposed. Europe is exposed. Britain is exposed. Iran has created a world where hard resource power decides outcomes.

And the punchline:

Iran’s mistake is that once Hormuz becomes structurally unreliable, the world builds around it. That means bypass corridors, revived pipeline politics, and urgent planning for routes linking Aqaba to Mediterranean outlets near Gaza and the long-stalled Basra-to-Aqaba pipeline. The old energy order is cracking. The UAE’s OPEC exit signals cartel discipline giving way to national advantage under pressure.

The full note can be found here, and we didn't have long to wait to see the world it predicted begin to emerge. 

Earlier today, Nikkei Asia reported that Japan agreed to buy an additional 20 million barrels of crude oil from the United Arab Emirates as Tokyo continues pursuing alternative supply channels amid the effective blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Japan used 2.36 million barrels of crude oil per day in 2025, the economy ministry reports. Based on this average, the additional 20 million barrels from the UAE could cover eight to nine days' worth of demand, so much more is coming. 

The deal was finalized Tuesday after Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's minister of economy, trade and industry, met with the Emirati industry minister in Abu Dhabi. Akazawa told reporters after the meeting that he had requested increased oil supplies for Japan. 

Roughly 40% of Japan's crude oil imports comes from the UAE. The Middle Eastern country, which left the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries on Friday, intends to gradually increase oil production at its own discretion, which could lead to more cooperation with Japan.

Japan will pick up the Emirati oil at the port of Fujairah on the UAE's eastern coast, which lies on the Gulf of Oman, allowing for crude exports without going through the Strait of Hormuz. 

The war in the Middle East -- a region on which Japan has relied for more than 90% of its oil supply -- has spurred Tokyo to approach other oil producers. It reached a deal last month to procure 1 million barrels of crude from Mexico. 

Recently Japan's government said that around 60% of the oil Japan needs this month can be sourced through channels that do not involve shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, with releases from domestic stockpiles covering the remaining 40%.

Expect many more such deals from other Asian countries as passage through Hormuz will be one big question mark for years to come, absent a pro-Western regime taking control in Iran. 

Realizing the coming demand flood for its Fujairah-laden oil, and in anticipation of its post-OPEC renaissance, on May 3rd, UAE state energy company Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) Group, announced plans to award AED200bn (US$55bn) in upstream and downstream project contracts between 2026-28, at the 'Make it with ADNOC' forum in Abu Dhabi.

Omar Al Nuaimi, ADNOC’s Acting Group Chief, stated that ADNOC is moving into a new phase of accelerated, world-scale delivery to meet rising global energy demand. ''ADNOC is proud to continue reinforcing our role as a catalyst of the UAE’s industrial growth and an enabler of the Make it in the Emirates initiative,'' he told the Emirates News Agency (WAM) on the sidelines of ‘Make it With ADNOC’ Forum, held ahead of the Make it in the Emirates 2026.

''As part of this effort, we announced today at the ‘Make it with ADNOC’ Forum, our plan to award AED200 billion in projects over the next two years as part of our CAPEX approved by the Board in November,'' he said, explaining that the planned project awards span ADNOC’s upstream and downstream operations and usher in a new phase of project delivery that will supercharge UAE’s manufacturing capacity, strengthen industrial resilience, deepen the impact of the company’s In-Country Value program and advance the ‘Make it in the Emirates’ initiative.

In a note from Goldman (available here to pro subs), the bank writes that management characterized the announcement as marking the execution phase of its strategy, focused on scale, pace, and delivery to meet rising global energy demand while reinforcing the UAE's industrial base. The forum convened >400 participants, linking EPC contractors with qualified UAE-based manufacturers under the in-country value program. The award pipeline spans the entire upstream-to-downstream value chain, focusing on:

  • Capacity expansion: Scaling of crude oil and gas production capacity alongside deeper downstream integration
  • In-Country Value (ICV): Channelling spend through the Local+ program to prioritize UAE-manufactured inputs.
  • Supply chain resilience: Localizing critical equipment sourcing to mitigate global disruption and cost inflation risk.

According to Goldman, this announcement represents the first tranche of its previously announced $150BN capex program for 2030. The bank views the announcement as positive for key enablers such as ADNOC Drilling and ADNOC L&S, as they stand to be the primary beneficiaries of the upstream and downstream award pipeline. Furthermore, the signaled US$55bn commitment over 2026-28 serves as a strong signal of ADNOC Group's expansion roadmap. Goldman sees upside risk to consensus numbers for the key enabler subsidiaries given the potential for accelerated execution timelines and higher-than-guided growth targets as ADNOC ramps up capacity across the value chain. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/world-starts-build-around-hormuz-japan-buying-uae-oil-bypassing-strait-adnoc-spend-55

Inside The Moscow Meeting That Laid Bare Iran's Weak Hand

 by Simon Watkins via oilprice.com,

  • The Moscow meeting reinforced a long-standing imbalance, with Iran seeking deeper support while Russia offered only vague diplomatic backing.
  • The 20-year Iran–Russia deal structurally favors Moscow, especially in energy and trade terms, leaving Tehran with limited economic and strategic upside.
  • Russia’s growing military and economic strain reduces its ability to support Iran, exposing the fragility of the partnership.
Iran has a long history of being screwed over by Russia, and last week’s meeting in Moscow between Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Russian President Vladimir Putin over the U.S.–Israel–Iran war suggests nothing in that dynamic is about to change, according to extremely well-placed sources on both sides who spoke exclusively to OilPrice.com over the weekend. On the one hand, Tehran’s perennially baseless optimism that “this time will be different” was on full display in Araghchi’s excited praise for the marvels of the two countries’ so called ‘strategic relationship’. On the other hand, Moscow responded with all the warmth of an international telephone operator: Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said only that Russia stands ready to offer “goodwill or mediation services”, with no indication of any upgrade to the relationship service package. It fits so neatly into the familiar pattern of this abusive relationship that one wonders whether social services should be called. Or perhaps Moscow’s disinterest is merely an act — a way of masking the deep and broad assistance from Tehran that it so clearly craves?

The theoretical basis of this relationship is the 20-year comprehensive cooperation deal between Iran and Russia -- formally titled The Treaty on the Basis of Mutual Relations and Principles of Cooperation between Iran and Russia -- approved by Iran’s late Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, on 18 January 2024, as I exclusively reported in OilPrice.com at the time. It replaced the 10-year deal signed in March 2001 (extended twice by five years) and was expanded in duration, scope and scale, particularly in the defence and energy sectors. In several respects, the new deal complemented key elements of the all-encompassing Iran-China 25-Year Comprehensive Cooperation Agreement, first revealed anywhere in the world in my 3 September 2019 article and analysed in full in my latest book on the new global oil market order. The similarities were deliberate, designed to make the division of the key strategic assets most coveted by Moscow and Beijing easier to manage in practice. Related: China Orders Refiners to Ignore U.S. Sanctions on Key Iranian Oil Buyers

As with much of Russia’s foreign policy dealings, the devil was in the details. As a sign of how things would pan out for Tehran in the rest of the document, Russia stood to benefit at Iran’s expense in the key energy sector to begin with. The deal gave Russia the first right of extraction in the Iranian section of the Caspian Sea, including the potentially huge Chalous field. This came on top of Russia’s startlingly brazen theft in 2019 of at least US$3.2 trillion in revenues from Iran through the lost value of energy products across their shared Caspian assets going forward. The same right of first extraction for Russia was also applied in the new 20-year deal to several of Iran’s major oil and gas fields in the Khorramshahr and nearby Ilam provinces that border Iraq, which China had not already prioritised for its own needs. Several of these sites had the broader financial and geopolitical benefits attached to their being shared fields with Iraq. This status allowed the effective free movement of Iranian oil disguised as Iraqi oil, and extended Tehran’s influence over Baghdad through its political, economic, and military proxies. By extension, it did the same for Moscow and Beijing, which used this as a springboard to further project their influence across the Iran-dominated Shia Crescent of Power.

This powerbase in Iran and Iraq had also been central to Russia’s longstanding plan to build a ‘land bridge’ to the Mediterranean Sea coast of another of its key global assets at the time -- Syria. This would enable Moscow to exponentially increase weapons delivery into southern Lebanon and the Golan Heights area of Syria to be used in attacks on Israel. The core aim of this policy was to provoke a conflict in the Middle East that would draw in the U.S. and its allies into an unwinnable war, and was seen as a natural extension of the Israel-Hamas War that had begun after the terrorist organisation’s murderous spree across Israel on 7 October 2023. Given its centrality to Moscow’s plans, then, Iran was at that point still confident that the Kremlin would meet its other promises in the 20-year deal, despite the shenanigans surrounding the energy side of the treaty as it related to the Caspian’s oil and gas riches. “Iran had long been asking  Russia for the means to defend itself better against any attacks, especially those that might come from Israel or the U.S. -- in particular for the S-400 missile defence system and Sukhoi Su-34 and 35 fighter jets,” a very senior source working closely with Iran’s Petroleum Ministry exclusively told OilPrice.com. “But these requests have continually been subject to further conditionality by Russia, such as upgrading key airports and seaports that Moscow sees as especially useful for dual-use by its air force and navy, and which are also close to major oil and gas facilities.

The terms of the individual defence and energy deals were also made increasingly onerous for Iran by Russia as preconditions for the final delivery of Iran’s requests. According to this source -- and confirmed to OilPrice.com at the time by a very senior source working closely with the Russian government -- the price of all items traded between Russia and Iran, including military and energy hardware, had been formalised in the 20-year deal on terms that were not in Iran’s favour. For Iranian goods exported to Russia, Tehran would receive the cost of production plus 8 per cent. However, these export sales to Russia would not be transferred to Iran, but rather would be held as credit in the Central Bank of Russia (CBR). Moreover, Iran would receive a huge markdown on US dollar/Rouble or Euro/Rouble exchange rates used to calculate its credits in the CBR. Conversely, for Russian goods exported to Iran, Moscow would receive the payment in advance of delivery and at an exchange rate that benefited Russia. Moreover, the base price before any exchange rate calculations would be set at the highest price that Russia has received in the previous 180 days for whichever product it was selling to Iran. Moscow ensured itself the highest possible price by selling the relevant product to Belarus at a very large premium shortly beforehand, so establishing the required pricing benchmark. Payments for goods and services falling outside the direct finance route between the central banks of the two countries would be handled through interbank transfers between Iranian and Russian banks. Transactions involving renminbi would also be routed through China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, Beijing’s alternative to the globally-dominant Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications system.

The additional problem for Iran now is that Russia is increasingly unable to provide even this limited assistance to it as its own troubles mount. Although U.S. President Donald Trump’s stance on Russia’s ’10-Day Special Military Operation’ -- at the time of writing, in its 1,530th day -- has broadly favoured Putin and his ability to keep funding the conflict, things have turned very recently. The removal of pro-Putin Hungarian President Viktor Orbán in last month’s general election removed the obstacle that blocked €90 billion in European Union (E.U.) aid to Ukraine, with more to come as and when needed. This comes at a time when, according to military sources, Russia is only able to replace 70 per cent of the soldiers it is losing on the battlefield -- an unsustainable loss, which brings with it the deeply politically unsettling prospect of having to widen conscription out to the big cities, including Moscow and St. Petersburg. Moreover, Ukraine is now relentlessly hitting key oil and gas infrastructure targets deep in Russia, reducing its ability to monetise these exports to fund its Ukraine campaign. Crude oil export data suggested the rise in prices, plus the easing of U.S. sanctions on countries buying Russian oil, boosted Russian revenues to 2.3 times their December-February levels in the third week of the Iran war. But by the fourth week, Ukrainian drone strikes on energy-producing infrastructure reduced Russia's earnings by US$1 billion, eradicating around two-thirds of the previous week’s gains. And destroying Russia’s energy infrastructure using Ukraine-manufactured long-range drones -- without any U.S. assistance and using E.U. funding -- is now a priority target.

As it stands, Iran has once again bet on a partner that takes far more than it ever gives. And as Russia’s own position deteriorates, even the illusion of reciprocity is evaporating. Tehran may soon discover that Moscow’s promises were always worth less than the paper they were written on. With Russia now struggling to sustain its own war effort, the chances of it honouring its commitments to Iran are shrinking by the day. And when the Kremlin finally admits it has nothing left to offer, Tehran will be left with no air defences, no aircraft, no navy, and no leverage — only the bill for a partnership that never paid out.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/inside-moscow-meeting-laid-bare-irans-weak-hand