Search This Blog

Friday, May 29, 2026

'We Outright Grabbed The Wallets': Bessent Boasts $1BN In Iran State Crypto Seized To Date

Washington's economic war on Iran and its 'shadow' banking network continues, as on Friday Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced the US has seized $1 billion in Iranian cryptocurrency assets as part of the economic component of President Trump's Operation Epic Fury.

The billion dollar figure represents the running total seized to date, building on prior milestones in the conflict, particularly a recent major April 2026 freeze of $344 million in USDT on the Tron blockchain. By close of April, $500 million total had been seized.

And so clearly with the addition since then of some half-billion dollars more in seized digital assets, the US Treasury program has only greatly accelerated in the last several weeks.

During his Friday speech before the Reagan National Economic Forum, Bessent stated:

"Just outright grabbed the wallets. Some of them may be typing in right now and might not realize their wallet had been grabbed."

Assets are held "on behalf of the Iranian people" - he described, while framing that the Iranian government had 'stolen' the money from the Iranian populace.

Bessent is signaling further relentless waves of OFAC wallet designations and aggressive asset forfeitures coming in the next months, as highly sanctioned Iran continues to seek alternative means of conducting financial transactions.

As we've featured before, for ordinary Iranians - roughly one in six of the population - crypto served as a vital lifeline. Facing relentless rial depreciation (down nearly 90 percent since 2018), chronic inflation of 40 to 50 percent, and frequent power blackouts or internet shutdowns during protests, citizens turned to Bitcoin and stablecoins like U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins (USDT) on the Tron network to hedge savings, facilitate remittances, and move value when traditional banking failed. Spikes in Bitcoin withdrawals to personal wallets often coincided with domestic unrest and regional conflicts.

Yet this parallel financial system has also become a powerful tool for the state. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) steadily tightened its grip on Iran’s crypto flows. IRGC-linked addresses received more than $3 billion in 2025—up from over $2 billion in 2024—with their share rising to more than 50 percent of total Iranian crypto inflows by the end of 2025. These figures represent conservative lower bounds based only on identified and sanctioned wallets.

Washington in the meantime is still entertaining dreams of sparking some kind of anti-regime uprising based on applying the economic squeeze to the Iranian system, but apart from unrest back in January, this has utterly failed to materialize. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/we-outright-grabbed-wallets-bessent-boasts-1bn-iran-state-crypto-seized-date

US Service Members Targeted Via Commercial Location Data, Pentagon Tells Senators

 Adversaries have used commercially-available location data to attack individual US service members in war zones, according to a report furnished by the Department of Defense to Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, and first reported by Reuters. Wyden is a Democratic member of the Senate intelligence committee. 

Responding to four questions Wyden had posed about this potential avenue of vulnerability for service members deployed to the Middle East, the Pentagon said that US Central Command "has received multiple threat reports concerning adversary exploitation of commercial location data to target or surveil US personnel in theater. The Threat Fusion Cell identified, tracked, and disseminated these threats through the USCENTCOM Threat Working Group and to component force protection personnel." 

A US Army soldier takes an iPhone selfie at a base in Qayyara, Iraq in 2016 (Reuters - Alaa Al-Marjani)

Elaborating on the nature of the threat, the Pentagon noted that: 

"Commercial location data can be used to identify where U.S. troops congregate and their pattern of life, which can be exploited by adversaries ​to target attacks such as missiles, drones, and roadside bombs, as well as for counterintelligence purposes." 

The Pentagon's brief set of responses did not provide details on any specific incidents. Early in the US-Israeli war on Iran, two DOD officials were wounded in an Iranian drone strike on a Crowne Plaza hotel in Bahrain. After the strike, a senior Iranian official told Drop Site that Iran had built a "target bank" of both American and Israeli personnel.  “The fact that they’ve now pinpointed the residences/locations of some of these forces has really caught the Americans and Israelis off guard," the official said, without detailing Iran's methodology. He did say the building of the target bank began after the 2025 12-Day War.   

The Pentagon response to Wyden was dated April 14. On Thursday, Wyden and a bipartisan group of 13 other senators sent a letter to the Defense department's chief information officer, expressing "serious concern that the [DOD] has not taken basic steps to protect U.S. military personnel from the serious counterintelligence and force protection threat posed by the collection and sale of personal information, including cell phone location data, by data brokers."

This vulnerability was identified at least 10 years ago, when tech contractor Mike Yeagley briefed the Joint Special Operations Command on how enemies could exploit commercially available phone location data to create "pattern of life" profiles of individual service members. The contractor, who first publicized the nature of his 2016 briefing in a 2024 Wired article, showed JSOC's senior officers how he'd tracked phones from US bases that house special ops soldiers to an abandoned cement factory in Syria, which they were using as a forward operating base near an ISIS stronghold in Kobane. The rattled JSOC officers immediately relocated the briefing to a better-secured room. 

For that same article, Wired journalists teamed up with German investigative reporters to acquire a free sample of 3.6 billion coordinates -- some separated by mere milliseconds -- on upwards of 11 million mobile advertising IDs in Germany, covering a two-month period. "Our analysis revealed granular location data from up to 12,313 devices that appeared to spend time at or near at least 11 military and intelligence sites, potentially exposing crucial details like entry points, security practices, and guard schedules," the journalists reported.  

Journalists used commercial data to pinpoint location signals from 800 devices at the US Army's European headquarters at Lucius D. Clay Kaserne (Wired)

In their letter sent Thursday, the Democratic and Republican senators scolded the Pentagon for leaving troops vulnerable:

"DoD officials have not treated this counterintelligence and force protection threat as a five-alarm fire... DoD has known about this threat for over a decade, yet have failed to take meaningful steps to protect our men and women in uniform. That is simply unacceptable."

They urged the Defense Department to take several specific actions, including the disabling of advertising ID on all DOD-issued smartphones, and ordering service members to disable the advertising ID on personal phones taken onto military installations or on overseas deployments. They also called for the Pentagon to remove browsers  "designed to facilitate data collection by Google and other advertising companies, such as Google Chrome, from DOD unclassified computers and smartphones." They concluded their letter by posing five follow-up questions, with a due date of June 26. 

At least 13 American service members have been killed in the undeclared war on Iran, and approximately 400 have been wounded in action. It will likely take further probing by Wyden and others to determine whether it's likely that commercially-available data was used to pinpoint any of their locations. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/military/us-service-members-targeted-commercial-location-data-pentagon-tells-senators

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/US-Cuban-generals-meet-near-Guantanamo-base/66401018

'Most significant change in 20 years’: Cancer centers prepare for daraxonrasib demand

 Health systems across the U.S. have experienced an uptake in patient demand for the pancreatic cancer drug daraxonrasib in the weeks since the FDA granted expanded access to the drug through a May 1 “safe to proceed” letter.

Demand heightened following news the Revolution Medicines drug extended survival among stage 4 pancreatic cancer patients who participated in a clinical trial. Of the 168 patients enrolled in the trial, 35% responded to the drug. Among trial participants, the median progression-free survival time was 8.5 months and the median overall survival was 13.1 months.

While pancreatic cancer represents only 3.2% of new cancer cases, it is the cause of 8.4% of cancer deaths — making it the third-leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., according to the National Cancer Institute. 

The District of Columbia and Delaware have the highest rates of pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality, respectively, according to the most recent data published by the American Cancer Society.

Becker’s asked 19 health system leaders if their organizations are experiencing an increased interest in the pancreatic cancer drug and how they are preparing to meet patient demand.

Editor’s note: Responses have been lightly edited for clarity and length. 

Hani Babiker, MD. Associate Director of Clinical Research Operations at Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (Jacksonville, Fla.): Pancreatic cancer is a disease with poor prognosis and increasing incidence, and we have been trying to find a therapeutic breakthrough for decades. A breakthrough was announced on April 13.

This is good news not only for us pancreatic cancer oncologists but most importantly for our patients who are in dire need of such an advancement. This year also a one-of-its-kind  noninvasive device has been approved in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer that increases efficacy with new therapies in pancreatic cancer. 

Yes, demand is high, and metrics to facilitate access is our priority here at the Mayo Clinic. We as oncologists at our three NIH sites are actively educating patients about daraxonrasib, developing metrics of facilitating expanded access that will take some time, meeting regularly to discuss ways of removing obstacles, and developing collaborative efforts to initiate new trials with the drug. We also are in close communications with our partners in community practices to provide them with any updates. Moreover, we are actively studying daraxonrasib with other drug combinations in the lab to inform potential future investigator-initiated trials to further advance efficacy.

Gregory Botta, MD, PhD. Medical Oncologist and Associate Professor of Medicine at University of California San Diego Health: Daraxonrasib has not yet been FDA-approved for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients after first-line chemotherapy. Currently, an expanded access program has been announced and UC San Diego Health has submitted an application. We are actively processing the application with the manufacturer and determining the next steps for obtaining and distributing daraxonrasib. Per overall guidance, the EAP provides a pathway for access to investigational medicines for patients with a serious or life-threatening condition, who have no comparable or satisfactory alternative treatment options, have exhausted approved treatment options, and are not able to join a clinical trial.

Mitesh Borad, MD. Oncologist, Professor of Medicine and Leader of the Novel Therapeutics and Therapeutic Modalities Program at Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center (Phoenix): Our approach has been multi-pronged and proactive instead of being reactive. We foresee that access issues will persist even after FDA approval given the narrow setting the drug may garner for its initial approval — second line and beyond metastatic patients.

The RASolute 302 study will pave the way for use in the refractory, metastatic setting. We are opening multiple front-line metastatic trials, adjuvant therapy trials, combination therapy trials and also planning for trials for next generation drugs that can overcome daraxonrasib resistance. We are also developing investigator-initiated trials using daraxonrasib that address locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients which represents about 40 percent of pancreatic cancer diagnoses.

Our role as the leading medical center is to be at the forefront of this “revolution.”

Michael Cecchini, MD. Co-Director of the Colorectal Program in the Center for Gastrointestinal Cancers at Smilow Cancer Hospital; Director of GI Clinical Research Team, Yale Center for GI Cancers; and Associate Professor of Medicine at Yale School of Medicine (New Haven, Conn.): Yale Smilow Cancer Hospital is participating in the daraxonrasib expanded access program. We have a high volume of patients interested in this therapy. Once activated, in addition to clinical support (physician, nursing, pharmacy, etc.) the expanded access program will require appropriate research staffing (research coordinators, regulatory support, data managers, etc.). We have the necessary clinical support in place for our patient population, and we have allocated the necessary research support to the program to meet the needs of our patient population.

Christopher Chen, MD. Assistant Professor in the Division of Oncology in the Department of Medicine at Stanford (Calif.) University: Many of our patients have been carefully tracking the development of daraxonrasib as well as other KRAS inhibitors for many years, including participating in clinical trials of such drugs at Stanford.  We are striving to establish expanded access to these drugs as soon as possible as well as preparing for the anticipated commercial launch.

Andrew Chapman, DO. Director of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Executive Vice President of Cancer Research and Oncology Services at Jefferson Health (Philadelphia): As expected, there has been significant patient interest in daraxonrasib. In efforts to meet patient’s needs, we are working with Revolution Medicines to develop an expanded access program as quickly as possible.

Deirdre Cohen, MD. Director GI Oncology and Associate Professor of Medicine at Mount Sinai (New York City): Our cancer center has received a growing number of requests from both patients and providers regarding access to daraxonrasib following the recent FDA approval of the expanded access program. There is definitely increased interest from patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who are looking for additional treatment options.

To prepare for this demand, our oncology, pharmacy and research teams have been working together to review eligibility criteria, access pathways, and operational workflows so we can help manage referrals, prior authorizations, and treatment coordination as efficiently as possible. We are also educating providers and nursing staff on dosing considerations, toxicity monitoring and management of potential side effects to ensure patients can be monitored closely and treated safely once therapy is initiated.

At the same time, we are making sure patients and referring providers have clear, up-to-date information about the process and expectations for treatment. Our goal is to provide timely access while ensuring patients receive the appropriate education, monitoring and support throughout therapy.

Samir Dalia, MD. Oncologist and Physician Leader for Oncology Pharmacy and Therapeutics at Mercy (Chesterfield, Mo.): This drug looks like it may be the next best option for an otherwise dismal disease. We’re seeing increasing interest from our patients and from our clinicians. Our focus is on being ready. We’ve already started building a plan for the medication in our electronic medical record and we are making sure the right clinical and approval processes are in place so we can offer the drug through the current access program. If the treatment is right for a patient, we want to be able to offer it without delay. At Mercy, we make every effort to provide new, effective therapies available as quickly and safely as possible.

W. Jeffery Edenfield, MD. Executive Director of Medical Oncology at Prisma Health (Greenville, S.C.): The response to the survival data associated with daraxonrasib has been brisk and constant. We have placed many patients on the compassionate use list in keeping with the process forwarded by the FDA and Revolution Medicines. I am not aware at present that any of these patients have received the drug through this program, but we are hopeful. There are few human cancers less touched by progress than pancreas cancer and we are all excited to be able to discuss this with patients.

Vikram Gorantla, MD. Medical Oncologist at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (Pittsburgh): There is incredible excitement about daraxonrasib and its benefits in advance stage 4 pancreas cancer in patients with KRAS biomarker mutation. It has been a while since we have seen a drug which doubled overall survival benefit in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has been a wasteland for clinical trials. Numerous promising agents have failed in phase 3 data however the RASolute 302 Phase 3 data is expected to be positive with drug approval in Q3 this year. We at UPMC Hillman Cancer Center have been able to work with Revolution Medicines to provide expanded access programs for patients who cannot wait. We expect to open clinical trials using this in the early stage, adjuvant setting to reduce the risk of recurrence. We are also planning on working with Revolution Medicine on quality initiatives to make sure biomarker testing is being done for all patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, which will help patients identify where this drug will work. Our pathology department is working on expedited liquid biopsy KRAS testing with turnaround in a matter of days versus weeks. We have already started working with our dermatology colleagues to deal with the skin toxicity that is seen in 90% of patients on this drug.

Tri Le, MD. Medical Oncologist at UVA Health (Charlottesville, Va.): Our cancer center is working with the team from Revolution Medicines to set up the early access program to allow eligible patients at UVA Comprehensive Cancer Center access to treatment with daraxonrasib. We have received queries from patients both inside and outside our health system but do not yet have this medication available for patient use.

Christopher Lieu, MD. Associate Director of Clinical Research at the University of Colorado Anschutz Cancer Center (Aurora): Our health system has received a surge in inquiries regarding daraxonrasib for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the significant unmet need in pancreatic cancer and the compelling clinical data that has been reported, this high level of patient interest is understandable. To handle this demand, our cancer clinical research teams are actively collaborating with Revolution Medicines to utilize their expanded access protocol. Because of the extraordinary nationwide demand for this therapy, the administrative processes are taking some time to navigate as Revolution Medicines manages an unprecedented volume of requests on their end. We are dedicating all necessary resources and working every day to advance the daraxonrasib protocol to deliver this promising new treatment to the patients as quickly as possible.

Rosario Ligresti, MD. Director of Pancreas Center at Hackensack Meridian Health Hackensack (N.J.) University Medical Center: The John Thuerer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center is experiencing a substantial interest in this new drug, especially since it really represents the most significant change and success in pancreatic cancer chemotherapy in 20 years! That said, obtaining it through the new FDA program will take substantial effort and expended resources.  

Thankfully, John Thuerer Cancer Center has a very robust phase 1 new drug program and we are quite used to implementing new, cutting-edge therapies seamlessly. Hopefully this is the first of many targeted and precision therapies for pancreatic cancer. It certainly offers patients hope where there really wasn’t much hope before.

Jonathan Mizrahi, MD. Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologist, Ochsner MD Anderson Cancer Center (New Orleans): Our pancreatic cancer patients are understandably excited and eager to have another option that could improve their survival. Unlike IV chemotherapy which can include longer clinic appointments, daraxonrasib is an oral medication that conveniently keeps patients at home for treatment. We have experienced a substantial increase in inquiries about daraxonrasib in the last month, particularly since the FDA announced that the drug would be available through an early access program. Those who have inquired have either exhausted standard of care therapies for their pancreatic cancer or are not tolerating chemotherapy well. We have begun setting up the early access infrastructure at Ochsner to efficiently procure daraxonrasib for eligible pancreatic cancer patients. While we have not yet had any patients obtain the medication, we have identified clinically appropriate patients and will be ready to prescribe daraxonrasib as soon as possible.

Vaibhav Sahai, MD. Associate Professor of Internal Medicine in Hematology/Oncology at University of Michigan Health (Ann Arbor): The University of Michigan Health has been experiencing an increased patient interest in the pancreatic cancer drug daraxonrasib. We have instituted several access possibilities, including working with Revolution Medicines to open the expanded access study at our site. On the patient side, we have been discussing access with all existing pancreas cancer patients that either meet or do not meet expanded access criteria. We have been increasing access to new patients and encouraging both patients, through the cancer answer line, and physicians, through M-line, to reach out to us. In addition, the Rogel Cancer Center has other KRAS inhibitor trials open and several others opening for our patients with pancreatic cancer in the community.

Ardaman Shergill, MD. Oncologist and Assistant Professor of Medicine at UChicago Medicine: Patients are keenly interested in having an opportunity to benefit from daraxonrasib. We participated in the RASolute 302 study and have experience with the drug. We are working as quickly as possible to be able to open the expanded access protocol at the University of Chicago Medicine. Our UChicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center leadership is very supportive. They’re prioritizing this for our patients and sharing resources and support to move quickly. Furthermore, the Revolution Medicines team has been responsive in understanding, mitigating and/or removing delays. A lot of centers are trying to open and a lot of patients are seeking the drug, so this systematic approach to avoid delays and unnecessary steps is key. It is important to keep sharing the feedback and patient input as well as stories to make progress — and to do so in time so the patients who need it most right now can get it.

Sara Moran Smith, PharmD. Oncology Pharmacy Program Manager at Allina Health (Minneapolis): We are seeing a significant increase in patient and provider interest in daraxonrasib, which reflects the excitement surrounding its promising clinical outcomes and the urgent need for new treatment options in pancreatic cancer. At Allina Health, we are proactively preparing by developing internal workflows, including EMR builds and prescribing pathways, to support safe and efficient use through the expanded access program. At the same time, access remains dependent on manufacturer processes and supply availability, and we are experiencing delays in receiving key information needed to operationalize the program. Our current focus is on building a scalable, compliant framework, by partnering closely with research, pharmacy and clinical teams so that once access is granted, we can rapidly and equitably deliver this therapy to eligible patients.

Ashwin Somasundaram, MD. GI Cancers Clinical Trial Lead at UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (Chapel Hill, N.C.): Our cancer center has experienced a surge of interest in access to daraxonrasib. From day one of the announcements, we have worked with the FDA and Revolution Medicines to set up one of the first expanded access programs in the country. 

Robert Vonderheide, MD. Director of the Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine (Philadelphia): The response from our patients, our physicians, and from patients and their families outside of our healthcare system seeking access to daraxonrasib has been massive. As a site for the Phase III RASolute 302 study and the Phase I GI-102 study, our clinicians have seen firsthand how daraxonrasib has impacted the lives of many patients with pancreatic cancer who were running out of options. There is real hope with this new approach. We have an all-hands-on-deck effort here to work with the manufacturer to secure access and safe deployment of the drug for our patients.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/pharmacy/the-most-significant-change-in-20-years-cancer-centers-prepare-for-daraxonrasib-demand/

Patient death draws renewed CMS scrutiny at HCA’s Mission Hospital

 CMS told Becker’s it is aware of a reported patient death by suicide at Mission Hospital in Asheville, N.C., part of Nashville, Tenn.-based HCA Healthcare, which in January was placed in immediate jeopardy for the fourth time since 2019.  

On May 21, a patient under an involuntary commitment order died by suicide inside the hospital’s emergency room “Red Pod,” a unit with trauma bays for critical patients that can also serve psychiatric patients, after the individual was brought in by law enforcement, the Asheville Watchdog reported May 26. 

In response to the incident, hospital leadership circulated updated safety protocols requiring one-to-one monitoring for all patients under involuntary commitment orders until suicide risk assessments are completed. Staff were also instructed to alert emergency department leadership if a sitter is not present or if concerning items are found in a patient’s room. 

Surveyors for CMS were reported to be at Mission Hospital on May 26, according to the Watchdog

The incident comes months after regulators cited the facility for multiple patient care and safety deficiencies during a January CMS survey. The agency’s findings included deficiencies tied to two patient deaths, failures to properly isolate infectious diseases and concerns about staffing levels in the hospital’s behavioral health units.

Mission Hospital submitted an enhanced plan of correction after the survey concluded Jan. 9. CMS accepted the revised plan Feb. 2. Federal regulators lifted the immediate jeopardy status at Mission Hospital, CEO Greg Lowe, said in a March 4 memo to staff. 

While the immediate jeopardy status was lifted, the hospital has been under enhanced monitoring since January, the Watchdog reported. According to a Feb. 27 CMS letter, the hospital remained out of compliance with Medicare conditions of participation, including requirements surrounding patients rights, nursing services, and infection prevention and control. The hospital has until July 29 to achieve substantial compliance or it could face termination of its Medicare provider agreement. 

In a May 27 statement, CMS told Becker’s the hospital “remains under enhanced monitoring.” Alongside its required plan of correction, the hospital committed to additional measures aimed at addressing broader quality and patient safety concerns.

“CMS will continue to closely monitor and assess the hospital’s compliance with federal requirements and evaluate the implementation of corrective actions,” a spokesperson said. “The agency will take additional action as necessary to promote patient safety.”

HCA said in a statement shared with Becker’s: “The loss of any patient is heartbreaking and traumatic for all involved. Our teams regularly review protocols with the intent to improve care, always. Additionally, we report to regulatory agencies when appropriate.”

The designation marked Mission Hospital’s third immediate jeopardy citation in the last two years and its fourth since HCA acquired the hospital in 2019. 

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/quality/patient-safety-outcomes/patient-death-draws-renewed-cms-scrutiny-at-hcas-mission-hospital/

Damning data: Foreigners are taking all our jobs

 by Olivia Murray

A brief look at jobs data in the U.S. and the U.K. remind us (again) that our replacement is not just conspiracy. First, the U.S.:

And, most of that is occurring in the South:

Screengrab

Now, the U.K., from a report out yesterday at GB News:

Mass migration is directly fuelling the youth unemployment crisis, new research has shown.

Migrants have snapped up three times as many jobs as young Britons since 2020, with 27 migrants from outside the EU hired for every British young person.

New research from the Centre for Social Justice has found non-EU youth on the UK payroll to have increased by 355 per cent from 2020.

 

Meanwhile, the British youth workforce has grown by less than one per cent since that same time.

No one could argue this isn’t replacement. Euro-heritage whites are allowed to exist, and we are allowed to have home nations—that’s a hill on which I’ll always die. And not only are we allowed, it is a good thing for everyone we are here.

I never voted until Trump entered politics, because I never believed any of the candidates would actually fight for me and my interests, and I therefore couldn’t be bothered. What difference would it make in my world? They were all the same corrupt liars. Romney? Obama? McCain? Dubya?! I mean seriously. Talk about a gross uniparty club.

But then came along Donald Trump, and though I couldn’t vote for him in the 2016 election (I hadn’t registered in time with a new move), I believed he was different, and proudly supported him at the ballot box in 2020 and 2024.

And while a lot of Republicans complained about how he wasn’t “presidential” or how he was too “childish” or snipey, those traits were exactly why I loved him so much. He was a master troll, and I found that admirable, not pathetic.

But all that trolling slop doesn’t do it for me anymore—I don’t care about a joke to rename ICE as NICE, and I don’t care about “owning the libs” with memes. Don’t get me wrong, that was necessary and relevant in the decade-past, but now I need serious results. I want those gosh dang mass deportations I was promised, the main reason I was willing to lose friends and family over my support of Trump, and take endless amounts of political abuse stumping for the man in the Democrat stronghold of Tucson for all those years. And the excuse that Trump “doesn’t have the support he needs” to fulfill that campaign promise is a load of BS—Greg Bovino was in there, and he was ousted real quick.

America is supposed to be for Americans, but these days, it’s anything but.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/05/damning_data_foreigners_are_taking_all_our_jobs.html

One hand washes the other: Bass mysteriously drops fire lawsuit of state just as Newsom endorses her

 by Monica Showalter

Los Angeles's leftist Democrat mayor, Karen Bass, has been carrying on with her celebrity endorsement campaign (noted here), complete with some really disgusting ones:

Angelenos need leaders willing to stand up and speak out.

Jane has never been afraid to do either pic.twitter.com/9LEsAR9XJx

— Karen Bass (@KarenBassLA) May 28, 2026

But this might be the worst:

"The work Karen Bass is doing in Los Angeles is making our entire state stronger. An 18% decline in homelessness while it grew nationally, historic drops in violent crime, boosting film production in L.A., and protecting our communities against ICE. She has my full support for… pic.twitter.com/ZH5auDHyka

— Karen Bass (@KarenBassLA) May 28, 2026

That's because Bass's rival for the Los Angeles mayor's race, conservative Spencer Pratt, spotted what looked like a quid pro quo:

you don’t hate these corrupt politicians enough. https://t.co/kPZcDjrDhZ

— Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) May 29, 2026

 

The timing is interesting.

So what's a cross-complaint?

According to the California Courts Self-Help Guide:

A cross-complaint (or cross-claim) is a legal document filed by a defendant to initiate a lawsuit within an existing case. It allows the defendant to sue the original plaintiff, a co-defendant, or a completely new third party, provided the claim arises from the same events as the original lawsuit.

It's known that there are complaints against the city by Pacific Palisades residents who were burned out by the January 2025 conflagration that destroyed more than half of that subdivision, and at least as much of the Altadena area, with city incompetence in keeping a reservoir built for the purpose of fighting fires filled, fire engines and hydrants in decent repair, police services available, and in the case of Altadena, residents warned, which many weren't, until the fire was all around them, leading to higher casualties.

As the city was being sued for its failures, the city apparently filed a cross-complaint against the state for what probably was the biggest liability -- failure to stomp out a smoldering brushfire known as the 'Lachman fire' started by a bum with a fascination with Luigi Mangione during a Santa Ana wind event, and refusal to permit bulldozers to plow down the area to create firebreaks and stomp out the embers owing to a supposed threat to an obscure endangered species plant being more important.

Yes, there were good grounds for a countersuit, even with all the incompetence of the city. And now the countersuit has been dropped, which once again deprives the burned-out residents any relief from the state for its role in spreading the blame. Too bad about the victims, nothing from the state for them.

If that was quid pro quo for the 'honor' of getting Gavin Newsom's endorsement (which is probably worthless, anyway), what a vile thing to do to Los Angeles's fire victims.

As if Newsom stealing the Fire Aid millions and handing it to his NGO buddies for their pet projects wasn't terrible enough, and the state and city refusing to exempt these victims from taxes and permits to rebuild weren't an utterly awful way to treat people who lost everything. Now there's this.

There were these problems, too:

Gavin Newsom was just in Washington DC virtue signaling about President Trump not supporting victims of the Palisades and Eaton Fires.

Well I hope you’re sitting down, but it turns out the billions Gavin Newsom promised to the victims of the Palisades and Eaton Fires are going… pic.twitter.com/LYEsMQOCbr

— Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) May 29, 2026

Bass may even be salting the earth for the next mayor by leaving the city alone holding the bag with the inevitable incompetence payouts.

Is Karen Bass banking on Spencer Pratt winning the election and seeing to it that Los Angeles is saddled with all the legal payouts as he takes office, even though the state is very much part of this blame for the fires, too? If so, then the act is even viler as Pratt is a fire victim himself.

As Spencer commented: You don't hate these corrupt politicians enough.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/05/one_hand_washes_the_other_karen_bass_mysteriously_drops_fire_lawsuit_against_state_just_as_gavin_newsom_endorses_her_for_los_angeles_mayor.html