Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

Newly Approved Drug a ‘Revolution’ for Postpartum Depression

Women with postpartum depression (PPD) can achieve rapid remission with a 60-hour infusion of brexanolone (ZulressoSageTherapeutics), and remission is sustained over 30 days, a pooled analysis from three randomized controlled trials shows.
Brexanolone is an intravenous formulation of allopregnanolone, an endogenous progesterone metabolite that is thought to modulate gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved brexanolone injection on March 19 for the treatment of PPD in adult women, noting that “this is the first drug approved by the FDA specifically for PPD.”
In the current analysis, Robert Lasser, MD, a psychiatrist at Sage Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, analyzed results from three randomized trials in which 140 women with PPD were treated with one of two doses of the drug and compared the results to those of more than 100 patients given placebo.
The findings, which were described by one expert as “a revolution” in the care of PPD, were presented here at the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) 2019 Congress.

Better Efficacy Than Oral Meds

Results showed not only that 75% of patients achieved a response and that 50% were in remission by the end of the 60-hour infusion but also that the response was sustained for 30 days, with 56% still responding and 36% in remission.
Moreover, Lasser said that the results “revealed brexanolone injection to be significantly better than placebo at reducing depressive symptoms” at rates that are “notably higher” than those “commonly expected with oral medications.
“Adverse events, as expected, included dry mouth and sedation, and those cases of excessive sedation resolved with simple dose interruption,” said Lasser.
Lasser began by noting that the underlying cause of PPD is unknown and is likely to involve multiple factors.
These may include a history of depression, alterations in inflammatory signaling, fluctuations in levels of gonadal hormones and neuroactive steroids, and dysregulation of stress pathways in the brain.
One potential mechanism that has been suggested for PPD, Lasser said, is the inability of the GABA system to regulate neural network activity, possibly through altered GABA receptor regulation.

Effective, Safe

To investigate the efficacy of brexanolone, the researchers conducted three randomized, double-blind trials in women with PPD.
The first trial involved patients with severe PPD, defined as the patient’s having a total Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of ≥25. Patients were randomly assigned to receive brexanolone injection at 90 µg/kg/hr (BRX90; n = 10) or placebo (n = 11).
For the second study, women with severe PPD were randomly assigned to receive BRX90 (n = 41), brexanolone injection at 60 µg/kg/hr (BRX60; n = 38), or placebo (n = 43).
In the final trial, women with moderate PPD, defined as the patient’s having a total HAM-D score of 20–25, were randomly allocated to receive BRX90 (n = 51) or placebo (n = 53).
The investigators pooled the results of the three trials and conducted an efficacy analysis in 102 patients treated with BRX90 and 107 treated with placebo.
In addition, they conducted a safety analysis in 140 patients treated with BRX90 or BRX60 and 107 patients who received placebo. Both analyses were preplanned.
Patients treated with BRX90 and those given placebo both experienced substantial reductions in the least squares mean total HAM-D scores over baseline by the end of the 60-hour infusion period.
However, the mean reduction from baseline to hour 60 was significantly greater with BRX90 than placebo, with a reduction in total HAM-D scores of -17.0 vs -12.8 (< .001).
BRX90 was also associated with significant improvements in response rates, defined as a reduction in total HAM-D scores over baseline of ≥50%, and in rates of remission, defined as a total HAM-D score of ≤7.
Specifically, the team found that 75% of patients treated with BRX90 experienced a response at hour 60, vs 56% of those given placebo (< .0001); 50% and 26%, respectively, achieved remission (= .0003).
The significant difference in response was sustained over the 30-day follow-up period, with 56% of BRX90 patients and 45% of those in the placebo group showing a response at the final assessment (< .0001).
A similar pattern was seen for those who achieved remission, with 36% of BRX90 patients and 22% of those given placebo in remission at 30 days (< .0001).
Lasser pointed out that patients who achieved a response or remission at hour 60 were likely to continue experiencing response or remission over 30 days. Of those given BRX90, 83% demonstrated a response, and 85% were in remission; of those given placebo, 81% showed a response, and 75% were in remission.
In the safety analysis, it was found that cardiac disorders, such as tachycardia; gastrointestinal disorders, including diarrhea, dry mouth, and dyspepsia; and vascular disorders, such as flushing, typically occurred in 2% to 3% of patients treated with brexanolone.
However, of greater interest were rates of sedation, particularly because this adverse event was singled out by the FDA in its approval announcement for the drug.
The FDA stated that, because “of the risk of serious harm due to the sudden loss of consciousness, patients must be monitored for excessive sedation and sudden loss of consciousness and have continuous pulse oximetry monitoring.”
In the current analysis, 13% of patients given BRX90 and 21% of those treated with BRX60 experienced sedation or somnolence; 3% and 5%, respectively, had loss of consciousness; and 12% and 13%, respectively, experienced dizziness, presyncope, or vertigo.
By comparison, among placebo patients, 6% experienced sedation or somnolence, and 7% experienced dizziness, presyncope, or vertigo.
Lasser said that the overall rates of sedation seen with brexanolone were “very similar to what we see with available antidepressants.
“In these cases, and with the oral medication that we’re testing, it comes exactly when you need it to, which is about 10 o’clock at night, when patients are ready to go to bed,” he said.

Depression Treatment Boon

Session chair Marcin Wojnar, MD, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, told Medscape Medical News that brexanolone is “a kind of revolution in treating depression, especially postpartum depression.”
He noted that this “can be a very dangerous, threatening condition, both for the mother and the child, so the faster and more effectively we could help such people, the happier we would be.”
In the post-presentation discussion, Wojnar noted that in addition to the drug’s “ultra-rapid action, there was also a very high level of response to placebo, which is not surprising, because most of pharmaceutical studies have such high responses, but it was really maintained afterwards.”
Lasser agreed, noting that “overcoming the placebo effect is a bigger and bigger issue in trials.”
He pointed out that the studies were conducted in hospital inpatients, so there was “even more potential for bias” in the placebo group.
Asked by a member of the audience whether the drug would cause any problems during breastfeeding, Lasser said that women stopped breastfeeding during the trial.
However, he added that a previous lactation study indicated that the amount of drug expressed in breast milk “is quite low; it’s around 1%, and only 5% of that is available to the child. So even if you were to breastfeed for over that 60 hours [of drug infusion], we don’t think it would cause an issue,” Lasser said.
The study was funded by Sage Therapeutics. Lasser is an employee of and owns stock in Sage Therapeutics. Wojnar has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
European Psychiatric Association (EPA) 2019 Congress: Abstract OC-0052. Presented April 8, 2019.

Silk Road Medical IPO Surges On First Day Of Trading

Shares of Silk Road Medical (SILK) popped more than 80% on Thursday with an initial public offering that drew heavy interest from investors. The Silk Road Medical IPO raised $120 million.
Shares priced at 20, the high end of its estimated range, and opened at 33.15. The stock climbed further, closing at 36.18, up 80.9% on the stock market today. Silk Road initially set a price range of 15 to 17, later revised to a range of 19 to 20.
Silk Road also hiked the number of shares for the offering by 28% to 6 million.
The Silk Road IPO garnered lots of attention from investors, with one IPO research firm giving the company its highest rating.

Research firm IPOboutique.com, which rates IPOs on a scale of 1 to 5, gave Silk Road a rare rating of 5, or “strongest buy,” at the IPO price. The last IPO that received a 5 rating was Facebook (FB) in 2012. Glitches marred the Facebook IPO, though.
Silk Road Medical focuses on preventing strokes. It uses minimally invasive technology “to safely and effectively treat carotid artery disease, one of the leading causes of stroke,” the company said in its IPO filing. “We have pioneered a new approach for the treatment of carotid artery disease called transcarotid artery revascularization, or TCAR, which we seek to establish as the standard of care.”
The company reported revenue of $34.5 million in 2018, up 143% from the prior year. It showed a loss of $39 million.

340B hospital program leads to higher costs, PhRMA says

  • The 340B Drug Pricing Program costs patients more in the long run by moving care to hospital outpatient settings rather than physicians’ offices, according to a recent analysis commissioned by the drug lobby Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, better known as PhRMA.
  • The research conducted by the Berkeley Research Group is the latest skirmish in a battle over the program, which the American Hospital Association, America’s Essential Hospitals and the Association of American Medical Colleges argue help safety net hospitals access affordable prescription drugs.
  • The report looked at Medicare Part B reimbursements for physician-administered medicine and found that 30% of payments were at 340B hospitals in 2017, a sizable jump from less than 10% in 2008. Reimbursements at 340B hospitals increased for breast cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple myeloma treatments.

The 340B program aims to help underserved communities get prescription drugs in safety net facilities. More hospitals have joined the program in recent years. In 2017, covered entities purchased more than $19 billion in drugs, a 114% increase since 2014.
With that growth has come controversy, including regulatory and legal fights.
Research has shown that drug spend at 340B hospitals is about one-third higher than at non-340B facilities. A New England Journal of Medicinereport found the 340B project “drives hospital/physician consolidation while not expanding care to low-income populations or improving their mortality rates.”
Critics like PhRMA and some lawmakers charge that the federal government doesn’t provide enough oversight or know how much hospitals are benefiting from the program. The lobbying group has criticized Health and Human Services 340B reform efforts, which it says puts too much burden and risk on drug manufacturers.
The Trump administration has attempted to cut 340B payments by 30%. However, a federal judge rejected those reductions in December. AHA, AEH and other groups that filed the lawsuit alleged the government “exceeded its statutory authority” by trying to cut the payments.
The 340B program changed Jan. 1 to allow participating facilities access to 340B drug manufacturers’ prices and to impose financial penalties for overchargers.
Earlier this month, HHS launched a website with prescription drug ceiling prices for the program. The Office of Pharmacy Affairs 340B Information System allows facilities to register and manage their participation in the program and now lets hospitals check drug prices and verify their accuracy. HRSA could fine drug manufacturers if they overcharge 340B facilities.

Novartis bribery investigation craters after Greek prosecutors clear 4 officials

Greek corruption investigators were looking into charges that Novartis bribed a group of politicians for preferential pricing of its drugs. Now that investigation is falling apart.
On Monday, prosecutors returned a case file to Greek Parliament clearing four politicians in a whistleblower investigation alleging a long-running bribery scheme between the Swiss drugmaker and 10 politicians from the country’s New Democracy party, Kathimerini reported.
The only name still listed on the file was that of former health minister Andreas Loverdos, but the newspaper reported investigators had found no evidence of Loverdos accepting bribes. The prosecutors’ case relies solely on witness testimony, the publication reported.
At least four of the remaining five politicians are expected to be cleared of all charges, the newspaper said, in what New Democracy officials have called a scam led by the country’s governing party, SYRIZA.
The case’s collapse comes after a Novartis internal probe in March found no evidence of “inappropriate payments” between company officials and Greek lawmakers. Those findings reflected a report from an expert panel in Greece, which also said last month that they had found no sign of suspicious payments to key officials, Kathimerini reported.

The bribery allegations, based on three whistleblower accounts, accused Novartis of paying former government officials—including two former prime ministers—millions of euros in exchange for increased sales of its products between 2006 to 2015.
Novartis’ internal probe did not address additional allegations in the suit that the company paid doctors in a kickback scheme to boost prescriptions.
As Novartis’ Greek tragedy unravels, the company is still in hot water with U.S. prosecutors as its earnest CEO Vas Narasimhan has worked to remake the company in his own image.
Last week, a U.S. District judge threw out Novartis’ request for summary judgment in a kickback lawsuit alleging a “companywide” scheme to pay doctors for scripts through sham promotional events.

Among the over-the-top allegations in that suit, prosecutors said Novartis sales officials treated doctors to $10,000 dinners at chic NYC seafood restaurant Nobu, held a promotional event aboard a fishing boat and treated physicians to wild nights at Hooters. That case is expected to go to a jury trial unless a settlement is reached.
Novartis was also flagged by Congress last year after it shelled out $1.2 million to Michael Cohen, the former personal lawyer and “fixer” for President Donald Trump. Novartis said it made the payments after Cohen approached the drugmaker offering insight into the Trump administration after his inauguration in January 2017. Company officials later said they received nothing from the arrangement.

As those dramas play out, Narasimhan, in his second year as CEO, has targeted M&A spending of $10 billion a year to help build out its pipeline in gene and cell therapy and pursue other “transformative” innovation. In 2018, Narasimhan spearheaded the acquisitions of gene therapy company AveXis and radiotherapy company Endocyte for $8.7 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively.
Meanwhile, the company has been shedding assets beyond its prescription drug business. Tuesday, the company wrapped up a spinoff of its eye division Alcon, acquired in a 2010 deal engineered by former CEO Daniel Vasella. The company has also sold some of its Sandoz generics business, and it’s working to segregate that division from the rest of the company in a move some consider a prelude to a sale.

AstraZeneca: Lynparza OKed in EU for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

AstraZeneca and MSD Inc., Kenilworth, N.J., US (MSD: known as Merck & Co., Inc. inside the US and Canada) today announced the European Commission has approved Lynparza (olaparib)as a monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutations (gBRCAm), and who have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally-advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Under the licensed indication, patients should have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane in the (neo)adjuvant or metastatic setting unless they were unsuitable for these treatments. Patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer should also have progressed on or after prior endocrine therapy, or be considered unsuitable for endocrine therapy.
Dave Fredrickson, Executive Vice President, Oncology, said: ‘With this approval, Lynparza provides patients throughout the EU with a targeted and oral chemotherapy-free treatment option for a difficult-to-treat cancer. It also reinforces the importance of testing for biomarkers including BRCA, hormone receptor and HER2 expression, helping physicians to make the most informed treatment decisions for patients.’
Roy Baynes, Senior Vice President and Head of Global Clinical Development, Chief Medical Officer, MSD Research Laboratories, said: ‘In the OlympiAD trial, which supported this approval, Lynparza demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. We look forward to making this new option available across the EU, where we hope it will improve outcomes for many patients.’
The approval was based on data from the randomised, open-label, Phase III OlympiAD trial which tested Lynparza vs. physician’s choice of chemotherapy (capecitabine, eribulin, or vinorelbine). In the trial, Lynparza provided patients with a statistically-significant median progression-free survival improvement of 2.8 months (7.0 months for Lynparza vs. 4.2 months for chemotherapy). Patients taking Lynparza experienced an objective response rate (ORR) of 52%, which was double the ORR for those in the chemotherapy arm (23%).
This is the third indication for Lynparza in the EU, and AstraZeneca and MSD are working together to deliver Lynparza as quickly as possible to more patients across multiple settings. Lynparza has a broad clinical development programme, including the ongoing Phase III OlympiA which is testing Lynparza as an adjuvant treatment in patients with gBRCAm HER2-negative breast cancer.

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Steep drug price hikes made to offset financial woes, Akorn says

Troubled Illinois-based pharmaceutical company Akorn steeply raised prices of at least a dozen drugs last month to try to offset several financial setbacks, according to STAT.
The drugmaker, which mainly develops generic medicines, raised the list price of several drugs by 19.4 percent to 285 percent. The largest increase was a pain relief gel,  Lidocaine HCI, which now costs $56.56 for a monthly supply.
Akorn also increased the list price of Paremyd ophthalmic solution by 202.5 percent. The drug, used for dilating the pupil to allow physicians to perform certain tests, costs $47.36 for a month’s supply.
In March, Akorn accounted for 12 of the 50 largest price increases made by U.S. drugmakers.
The jump in list prices comes after a series of financial setbacks for the drugmaker, including a failed merger, manufacturing woes, pricing pressure and stock dips.
An Akorn spokesperson told STAT that the drugmaker took “the necessary actions to return to profitability,” and that “select price adjustments enable us to continue to provide patients with the products they need, while continuing to invest in R&D and employ approximately 2,000 people around the globe.”

Cancer-killing combination therapies unveiled with new drug-screening tool

UC San Francisco scientists have designed a large-scale screen that efficiently identifies drugs that are potent cancer-killers when combined, but only weakly effective when used alone. Using this technique, the researchers eradicated a devastating blood cancer and certain solid tumor cells by jointly administering drugs that are only partially effective when used as single-agent therapies. The effort, a cross-disciplinary collaboration between UCSF researchers, is described in a study published April 9 in the journal Cell Reports.
When scientists developed the first targeted cancer therapies—drugs that interfere with specific biological circuits that cancer depends on for growth and survival—many thought they had finally cornered cancer. But cancer is a devastatingly clever disease that can outwit these precision medicines by “rewiring” itself to sidestep the circuits switched off by these drugs.
“Many cancers either fail to respond to a single targeted therapy or acquire resistance after initially responding. The notion that combining targeted therapies is a far more effective way to treat cancer than a single-drug approach has long existed. We wanted to perform screens with saturating coverage to understand exactly what combinations should be explored,” said UCSF’s Jeroen Roose, Ph.D., professor of anatomy and senior author of the new study.
Scientists have found that when they target two distinct circuits with two different drugs—each of which is inadequate on its own—the aggregate effect can be greater than sum of its parts. However, figuring out which drugs can synergize to kill cancer remains a challenge.
To demonstrate the power of their screening system, the scientists searched for targeted therapies that could join forces to kill an aggressive blood cancer called T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Their hunt began with a drug that targets PI3K, an enzyme that promotes the growth of many cancers, including T-ALL. Though drugs that target PI3K already exist, the current crop of PI3K inhibitors can slow, but normally can’t kill, this type of cancer.
“Nearly 65 percent of T-ALL patients have hyperactive PI3K, but most patients will likely not be cured by single-drug treatments. We wanted to find drugs that would kill T-ALL when combined with a PI3K inhibitor,” said Roose, a member of the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. To find those drugs, the researchers turned to RNA interference (RNAi)—a technique that allows scientists to massively reduce the activity of specific genes. The discovery of RNAi, which occurs naturally in all animals and plants, and is now widely used in research, was a major breakthrough that was recognized with the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
“RNAi is sort of a magic bullet for targeting specific genes,” said Michael T. McManus, Ph.D., professor at the UCSF Diabetes Center and study co-author, who designed the screen with Roose. “Although there is a great deal of fascinating underlying biology that relates to RNAi, most scientists use it as a tool to ‘turn down the volume’ of a specific gene in a cell.”
The gene-editing tool CRISPR has made it possible to completely remove genes. But according to McManus, while eliminating a specific gene is the gold standard—an essential first step in determining its function in —at times, reducing a gene’s activity level using RNAi activity may be more desirable. This is especially true, he says, when researchers are seeking to mimic the effects of drugs, which often reduce the activity associated with a particular gene without completely eliminating it.
“When searching for cancer drugs, for example, RNAi may do a better job of approximating precision therapies, both of which only partially inhibit their biological targets,” McManus said. The researchers have also started exploring CRISPRi and CRISPRa—modified forms of CRISPR that inhibit or amplify the activity of target genes, respectively, without making cuts to the DNA—for these reasons.
Roose and McManus aren’t the first scientists to use RNAi to search for these kinds of combinatorial therapies. But earlier efforts were error-prone because those screens used RNAi libraries that were too small, Roose said. What sets the new study apart is the ultra-complex collection of short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) that were used. These RNA fragments contain sequences that correspond to those found in messenger RNAs (mRNA)—the molecular arbiters of gene activity in the cell. When an shRNA finds an mRNA that contains a matching sequence, the two molecules bind together to initiate a process that destroys the mRNA and inhibits the activity of that gene. In total, the researchers targeted some 1,800 cancer-associated genes with approximately 55,000 shRNAs, or about 30 shRNAs per gene, “more than enough to eliminate false positives and false negatives,” Roose said.
The screen itself involved growing two different human T-ALL cell lines in the presence of PI3K inhibitors and then simultaneously administering shRNAs to find out which genes, when silenced in the presence of these drugs, killed the cancer. From this comprehensive screen, the researchers then focused on 10 genes whose activity, when curbed with precision medicines, was predicted to kill T-ALL cancer cells in combination with PI3K drugs. They tested these predictions and found that nine of the combined therapies could kill T-ALL—a feat that none of the drugs could achieve on its own. The researchers then tested the most effective of these synergistic drug combinations on mouse models of T-ALL and found that it could extend survival by 150 percent.
The screen also yielded a digital tool that Roose says will be useful for other researchers: a user-friendly, searchable databasebased on results from the screen. The search engine—developed by Marsilius Mues, Ph.D., a former Roose lab postdoc and lead author of the new study—produces mansuscript-quality figures that help resarchers identify  that emerged from the screen as potential targets for combination therapy with PI3K inhibitors.
Recognizing that discoveries made in blood cancers don’t always translate to solid tumors, the researchers also tested the predicted drug combinations on 28 solid tumor cell lines derived from human breast, colorectal, pancreatic and brain cancers. They found that even in these solid tumor cells, the combination therapies synergized to reduce the number of cancer cells by up to 20 percent over the course of the experiment.
“An important message from our work is that scientists can use leukemia cells as a platform to find  combinations that also work in solid tumors. Our screening platform is very generalizable,” Roose said.
Among the most surprising and promising of the results was that the researchers were able to find pairs of drugs that impeded cancer growth, but which had no effect on normal cells.
“Finding therapies that specifically target cancer without harming healthy tissue is the holy grail of cancer research,” Roose said. “This surprising result suggests that our method may aid in the discovery of this kind of -specific precision medicine.”

Explore further

More information: Marsilius Mues et al. High-Complexity shRNA Libraries and PI3 Kinase Inhibition in Cancer: High-Fidelity Synthetic Lethality Predictions, Cell Reports (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.045