Search This Blog

Sunday, June 12, 2022

Americans keep getting reinfected with COVID-19 as new variants emerge

 Despite a rather unpleasant bout with COVID-19 this past January, Jennifer McDonnell was relieved to think that she, and her family, could finally return to normal life, with a potentially strong immune protection stemming from both vaccination and a past infection.

“We had been cautious, but once we [got COVID-19] we thought, ‘We're good,'” McDonnell, who lives in Illinois, told ABC News. “We were vaccinated, boosted. We had natural immunity. We thought that we didn’t need to wear a mask.”

However, four months later, McDonnell was met with an unwelcome surprise, when she awoke in the middle of the night to a high-grade fever and a sore throat.

“I felt so terrible. I was so sick,” McDonnell said.

Because of her previous coronavirus infection just a few months earlier — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends testing for those who develop symptoms within 90 days of recovering — McDonnell thought she must have caught the flu, or perhaps come down with strep throat. But when her tests came back negative, her doctor decided to test her for coronavirus.

“When he told me that I was positive for COVID-19 again, I thought, ‘You’ve got to be kidding me,’” McDonnell said. “I thought you know six months, I'm good. I don't need to wear a mask. We were at like a whole bunch of sporting events… at parties without masks, no social distancing — nothing — we thought we had time.”

Now, three weeks after testing positive, McDonnell said that she still does not feel like herself, with this second round of COVID-19 feeling “way worse” than the first.

Although she was shocked to find herself positive again, data reveals that McDonnell is not alone. The phenomenon of reinfection -- which the CDC defines as a person who was infected, recovered, and then later became infected again -- has become increasingly reported over the last year, at first during the delta variant surge, and then during subsequent omicron surges.

Reinfection, spurred in part by more transmissible variants, waning immunity and relaxed attitudes towards effective mitigation measures like masks, mean that getting the pandemic under control is that much harder, even if cases are generally not severe, experts said. It also indicates that notions of "protection," both from natural infection and vaccination, held up earlier in the pandemic have changed. Similar to a common cold, it is possible to become infected multiple times.

ABC News contacted officials from health departments in all 50 states, and found that although data is still largely unavailable, a growing number of people do appear to experience reinfection with COVID-19.

1.6 million recorded reinfections

More than 1.6 million cases of reinfection have been reported across 24 states since data collection began, according to an ABC analysis and compilation of state provided data.

New York, Maine and California, have all reported over 200,000 reinfections respectively, while Michigan and North Carolina have confirmed over 100,000 reinfection cases each.

States reported that an increasing proportion of people had been reinfected two times, with some people facing reinfection three, four, and on very rare occasions, even five times. Definitions of reinfection vary by state.

Although health officials stressed that reinfections are likely significantly undercounted due to lack of reporting and home testing, overall, reinfections still represent a small share of the total number of cases reported across states.

The percent of cases confirmed as reinfections varies widely by jurisdiction, but a handful of states that provided the data reported a range of between approximately 4% and 15% of cases, the highest reported being in Utah in recent weeks.

“I believe that virtually everyone will be infected at some point in their lives, and most people multiple times. We see plenty of patients with reinfection, though it is a really hard number to quantify,” Dr. Shira Doron, an infectious disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center, told ABC News.

‘Reinfection does happen’

In May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledged that despite some protection against infection provided through prior infection and vaccination, cases of reinfection are possible and even can occur within 90 days of an initial infection.

“Studies suggest that reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 with the same virus variant as the initial infection or reinfection with a different variant are both possible,” the CDC wrote.

Symptoms during reinfection have been found to be less severe than during the initial infection, the CDC wrote, but some individuals may still experience more severe forms of disease.

It is also unclear how many people, who became infected during the omicron surge, have become reinfected by the same variant or subvariant of omicron.

“Although rates of reinfection might change as new variants emerge, vaccination remains the safest strategy for preventing future [COVID-19] infections, hospitalizations, [long-COVID-19] and death,” officials said. Isolation and treatment are still recommended for people who experience reinfection.

Doron explained that it can be difficult for physicians to tell the difference between a true reinfection and a “re-positive,” which she described as people staying positive on PCR tests for months at a time, or the occurrence of new symptoms while residual viral RNA is leftover in the nose, which can cause people to think they have tested positive again.

“The frequency of false positive test results is under-appreciated, so I often repeat the test in patients who are presenting with what appears to be a reinfection within a relatively short period of time — like 6 months — and frequently that repeat test is negative, but when it's positive, we don't have a way to know if the earlier one could have been a false positive,” Doron explained. “Reinfection does happen.”

Reinfection is more likely to happen to an individual when a different and more immune evasive variant is circulating, health experts said. The most recent examples were first the delta variant, and in the months that followed, the omicron variant.

“Although the increased ability to evade existing COVID-19 immunity began with the delta variant, it was omicron that took things to a whole new level,” Dr. Maureen Miller, professor of epidemiology at Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health, told ABC News. “The problem is compounded by the waning protection afforded by vaccination, previous infection or a combination of the two. Sadly antibodies wane in a period of three to six months.”

In New Jersey, unvaccinated people were 1.7 times more likely to become reinfected than vaccinated people, and 7.3 times more likely to become reinfected than vaccinated and boosted people.

With BA.2 subvariant, BA.2.12.1, on the rise, and other omicron sub variants, BA.4 and BA.5, looming behind, Miller said that there are growing concerns that emerging variants will be able to continue to evade immunity to an even greater degree.

“Each new variant and subvariant and sub-subvariant is going to have different ability to break through prior immunity, and prior immunity from vaccination and infection is so variable between individuals,” Doron explained.

Although reinfection likely will occur more frequently, Miller added that thus far, the current surge has not been accompanied by the high levels of hospitalizations and deaths though “both will be unacceptably high as we move through this latest wave.”

Although the latest COVID-19 variants have been shown to be more transmissible and better at evading vaccines, thus far, they have not been found to be more severe.

A shifting definition of protection against infection from COVID-19

McDonnell said that she feels that many people, like her, have a false sense of protection after the first infection.

Further, she said, “nobody [where she lives] wears a mask. If you have a mask on, people look at you like, why are you wearing a mask? Because they dropped all the mandates,” adding, “everyone just assumes it's over. It's not.”

How long people are truly protected against reinfection, following a COVID-19 diagnosis, is still a major question on the mind of many scientists, Doron said.

“If I just had COVID, for how long can I drop the precautions before I need to start to be careful again because I am at risk of reinfection? The answer is not very clear,” Doron explained.

In addition, the definition of “protection” against COVID-19, through natural immunity or vaccination, has changed frequently throughout the pandemic. In the initial months after the vaccine rollout, federal officials widely touted that vaccination largely protected against all forms of infection — mild, severe, and death — as well as re-infection.

“The science demonstrates that if you are fully vaccinated, you are protected,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said during a press briefing in May 2021, following the agency’s decision to drop its mask recommendation for fully vaccinated people.

Breakthrough infections — vaccinated people getting COVID-19 - were exceedingly rare, let alone reinfections.

Soon after, the delta variant emerged and new data was released, regarding the risk of breakthrough infections and the possibility of transmission between fully vaccinated people. Although protection against severe disease and death appeared to remain relatively steady, it became evident that people could not be unequivocally protected against infection following vaccination or infection.

In the early days of the pandemic, reaching herd immunity was frequently discussed by public health experts as a critical long-term goal in achieving national protection against COVID-19 and returning to normalcy.

However, this past March, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who had also often pointed to the importance of herd immunity, published a perspective paper in the Journal of Infectious Diseases in which he said that achieving “classical herd immunity” may not be achievable.

“There are significant obstacles to achieving complete herd immunity with COVID-19,” Fauci and his co-authors wrote. “Neither infection nor vaccination appears to induce prolonged protection against SARS-CoV-2 in many or most people.”

‘We will never eradicate or eliminate COVID-19’

The seemingly never-ending cycle of infection and reinfection can be perceived as daunting as the nation pushes to move on to a phase of the pandemic in which people are truly able to return to their normal lives.

“Remember, ‘flatten the curve’? We have not reached a threshold where enough people have a level of immunity that we can consider COVID-19 to be under control. As long as there is not enough immunity, it gives the virus a chance to mutate even more,” Miller said.

Although the U.S. is in a “much better” position than it was at the onset of the pandemic, in terms of immunity, Miller stressed that Americans must still be responsive to the rising and falling COVID-19 waves that will “continue to infect and reinfect us until we can achieve a level of control, where our health care systems are not periodically overwhelmed and deaths from COVID-19 become a much less common occurrence.”

Doron noted that the best ways for people to protect themselves against reinfection remain the same: stay up to date on vaccination, wear a high-quality mask in crowded indoor spaces, particularly if you are at increased risk.

“We will never eradicate or eliminate COVID-19. We'll have to settle for controlling it. We're not there yet,” Miller added.

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/americans-reinfected-covid-19-variants-emerge-data-shows/story

This Covid Wave Might Be the Start of ‘New Normal'

 Packed indoor events and fully booked flights where masks are few and far between suggest that the pandemic is a distant, unpleasant memory.

In reality, Covid-19 cases have steadily increased nationwide since the end of March. Hospitalization and death rates remain low, and will likely stay that way. But beyond that, many experts say they're unable to predict the trajectory of the current wave, including how and when it will end.

Given the past two years of pandemic precedent, that's somewhat surprising — and one indicator of many that the ongoing rise in cases is noticeably different than previous Covid surges. Some experts say it might even mark the beginning of the country's "new normal."

Here's why, and what that means for the future of the pandemic:

Why everyone you know is getting Covid these days

Previous surges were caused by the emergence of new Covid variants. This wave is powered predominantly by waning immunities, says Dr. David Dowdy, an associate professor of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and a physician with Baltimore Medical Services.

The immunity people gained by recovering from the omicron wave in December and January is fading away, allowing omicron and its subvariants "to make [their] rounds again," Dowdy tells CNBC Make It. And many Americans aren't taking particularly strict Covid precautions anymore, assuming that if they get sick, they'll likely recover without ever being hospitalized.

Taken together, that helps explain the past couple months of rising cases: The country's seven-day rolling average of new daily cases is up to 109,032 as of Wednesday, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That large number is likely a significant undercount, with many people now relying on at-home tests — and not reporting their results — or eschewing Covid tests entirely.

"We're seeing this disconnect between the 'official' number of cases, for example, and percent positivity or other indicators like wastewater surveillance," Dowdy says.

How to gauge whether you should be concerned

The winter omicron wave had an incredibly steep peak. By contrast, this one is more driven by "lots of mini waves that come and go," says Dr. Howard P. Forman, director of the health care management program at the Yale School of Public Health.

Forman says the virus' geographic circulation is different this time around: When New York is struggling, for example, Florida may be doing just fine, and vice versa. Those regional waves are often driven by different omicron subvariants — sometimes multiple at once — making the virus additionally difficult to tamp down. Forman says this is likely what Covid will look like for the foreseeable future. 

That doesn't mean reinstating lockdowns or mask mandates. Rather, Forman says, people should be prepared to adjust their behavior and take necessary precautions when there's an outbreak in their area — using metrics like hospitalization rates instead of new daily cases to gauge local severity.

"People have to understand that we're still going to have real waves and new concerning variants, and they do need to continue to pay attention and treat this as though it's still a pandemic," Forman says.

This could be a preview of the 'new normal'

The U.S. case load could eventually fall back to its early-March levels. Or, this could be a glimpse of what Covid-19 looks like as an endemic virus — in other words, our "new normal."

Either way, instead of trying to live like it's 2019 again, Forman recommends building Covid prevention strategies into your daily routine. Primarily, he says, that means staying up-to-date on your vaccines and getting comfortable with self-testing at home on a semi-regular basis.

Dowdy says you should take an at-home test an hour before heading to any big event or visiting loved ones, because "that's going to be the best indication of your contagiousness level at that time." You should also take an at-home test about five days after any potential exposure to the virus, he adds.

If you test positive, quarantine or isolate yourself appropriately — even if that means having to skip something important in your life. Forman says you could also consult your doctor about an antiviral treatment like Paxlovid, which is becoming increasingly available for treating Covid infections.

"Paxlovid works best if used to treat patients early, which means testing is even more important now than it was a few months ago," he says.

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/business/money-report/this-covid-wave-might-be-the-start-of-our-new-normal-experts-say-heres-what-you-need-to-know/3730202/

Long COVID-19 Liver Manifestation in Children

Cooper, Shiri MD†,⁑; Tobar, Ana MD*,⁑; Konen, Osnat MD‡,⁑; Orenshtein, Naama MD§,⁑; Kropach, Nesia MD§,⁑; Landau, Yuval MD PhD¶,⁑; Mozer-Glassberg, Yael MD†,⁑; Bar-Lev, Michal Rosenfeld MD†,⁑; Shaoul, Ron MD**; Shamir, Raanan MD†,⁑; Waisbourd-Zinman, Orith MD


doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003521


Abstract

Objectives: 

SARS CoV-2, the novel coronavirus responsible for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Gastrointestinal and hepatic manifestations during acute disease have been reported extensively in the literature. Post-COVID-19 cholangiopathy has been increasingly reported in adults. In children, data are sparse. Our aim was to describe pediatric patients who recovered from COVID-19 and later presented with liver injury.

Methods: 

This is a retrospective case-series study of pediatric patients with post-COVID-19 liver manifestations. We collected data on demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, laboratory results, imaging, histology, treatment, and outcome.

Results: 

We report five pediatric patients who recovered from COVID-19 and later presented with liver injury. Two types of clinical presentation were distinguishable. Two infants aged 3 and 5 months, previously healthy, presented with acute liver failure that rapidly progressed to liver transplantation. Their liver explant showed massive necrosis with cholangiolar proliferation and lymphocytic infiltrate. Three children, two aged 8 years and one aged 13 years, presented with hepatitis with cholestasis. Two children had a liver biopsy significant for lymphocytic portal and parenchyma inflammation, along with bile duct proliferations. All three were started on steroid treatment; liver enzymes improved, and they were weaned successfully from treatment. For all five patients, extensive etiology workup for infectious and metabolic etiologies were negative.

Conclusions: 

We report two distinct patterns of potentially long COVID-19 liver manifestations in children with common clinical, radiological, and histopathological characteristics after a thorough workup excluded other known etiologies.

https://journals.lww.com/jpgn/Abstract/9900/Long_COVID_19_Liver_Manifestation_in_Children.84.aspx












COVID-19 pandemic stress impacts ovulation

 Life disruptions and the stresses of the COVID-19 pandemic led to disturbed ovulation with decreased progesterone durations or levels, according to research being presented Sunday at ENDO 2022, the Endocrine Society’s annual meeting in Atlanta, Ga.


The study was the first to observe ovulatory disturbances without menstrual cycle disruption during the pandemic.

“These silent ovulatory disturbances likely explain why so many women who are not taking hormonal forms of birth control reported having early or unexpected periods in the days following a COVID-19 vaccination,” said Jerilynn C. Prior, M.D., FRCPC, Professor of Endocrinology at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada.

Prior and colleagues compared two independent, similarly-designed studies 13 years apart:  the Menstruation Ovulation Study (MOS), which was conducted in a group of 301 women from 2006-2008, and MOS2, which studied 112 women during the pandemic. Both studies included menstruating women ages 19-35 years, who were not taking systemic or combined hormonal contraceptives.

The first MOS was used as a control to compare to the MOS2 cohort’s experiences during the pandemic. All participants in both studies answered a comprehensive health, reproduction and lifestyle questionnaire and were asked to keep a daily diary of their menstrual cycles and general life experiences.

For MOS2, ovulation was documented using a validated quantitative basal temperature. Researchers will confirm MOS2 hormonal characteristics using salivary progesterone levels. For the MOS cohort, the researchers assessed ovulation by measuring urinary progesterone levels.

Nearly two in three women who took part in the study during COVID-19 were not ovulating normally, Prior said. The women either experienced short luteal phases, in which an egg was released without enough time from ovulation for pregnancy to occur, or anovulation, meaning no egg was released at all.

In comparison, the MOS study found only 10 percent of women experienced ovulatory disturbances. The MOS2 and MOS studies showed similar body weights, body mass index values and menstrual cycle and flow lengths. Thus, the women in MOS2 experienced no obvious signs of reproductive disruption.

Menstrual Cycle Diary© analyses for MOS2 showed significantly increased anxiety, depression, frustration, (overall negative moods), perceived outside stresses, sleep problems, and headaches compared to MOS.

“By comparing the two studies, and especially their daily diaries, we can infer that the SARS-CoV2 pandemic life disruptions cause silent ovulatory disturbances within mostly regular menstrual cycles—providing a unique experiment of nature,” Prior said.

Prior will speak at the Endocrine Society’s reproductive health news conference on Monday, June 13 at 9 AM. Register to watch the news conference at www.endowebcasting.com.

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/955089

Smithfield Foods, Citing "Escalating Costs," To Shutter California Meat-Packing Plant

 Meat-packing giant Smithfield Foods announced a 1,800-person pork processing plant in California would shutter operations next year, citing the rising cost of doing business in the liberal-run state. 

Smithfield, owned by Hong Kong-based pork conglomerate WH Group Ltd., "will cease all harvest and processing operations in Vernon, California in early 2023," the company said in a Friday press release

"Smithfield is taking these steps due to the escalating cost of doing business in California," the company continued. 

WSJ explains the company's reasoning behind winding down operations at the Vernon plant is due to a multitude of factors, including the cost of energy to power plants is 3.5x higher per head to produce pork than any of its 45 other US plants. 

"It's increasingly challenging to operate efficiently there," company spokesman Jim Monroe told WSJ. "We're striving to keep costs down and keep food affordable."

Monroe also made clear the regulator environment in the state wasn't favorable for meat processing plants. 

Smithfield also said part of the reason it closed the facility was the regulatory environment in the state. Specifically, a state law passed by voters in 2018 and backed by the Humane Society, called Proposition 12. It requires breeding pigs, or sows, to be able to lie down and turn around in spaces in which they are housed, essentially outlawing pork produced using small gestation stalls in most circumstances. -WSJ

Smithfield will also "decrease its sow herd in Utah and is exploring strategic options to exit its farms in Arizona." The planned shutdown isn't expected to reduce the supply or increase the costs of pork products at the supermarket. 

The announcement's timing comes as a string of fires and explosions damage major food processing plants across the country. The latest fire hit a huge poultry farm in Minnesota that supplies eggs to top supermarkets. 

What's also concerning is the US hog herd isn't expected to increase anytime soon as soaring input costs, such as higher feed, diesel, labor, and material costs, have financially strained farmers. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/smithfield-foods-citing-escalating-costs-shutter-california-meat-packing-plant

West Virginia Notifies Six Banks They May Be Breaking State’s Fossil Fuel Anti-Boycott Law

 by Nathan Worcester via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Six banks have been warned by the West Virginia State Treasury that they may be in violation of a new law preventing the state from doing business with financial institutions boycotting energy companies.

The office told The Epoch Times it had sent out letters on June 10, but did not share the banks’ names on the record.

Enacted in March 2022, S. 262 directs the state to notify financial institutions that they are slated for placement on the restricted financial institution list 45 days before the document is published.

Those institutions must respond within 30 days of receiving those notification letters to avoid winding up on the list.

In June 2021, Texas passed a similar law barring state agencies from investing in funds boycotting energy companies.

We felt like we had a clear conflict of interest,” said West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore at a June 8 press conference.

He cited firms that he said wish to benefit from the state’s finances while simultaneously “trying to diminish our dollars and destroy our industries.”

The letters come after months of escalating conflict between many energy-producing states and much of the financial sector.

In May 2021, Moore and treasurers from 14 other states sent a letter to U.S. Climate Envoy John Kerry protesting against his private comments to banks in March of that year. He reportedly asked major financial institutions to step up their climate commitments.

We intend to put banks and financial institutions on notice of our position, as we urge them not to give in to pressure from the Biden administration to refuse to lend to or invest in coal, oil, and natural gas companies,” Moore and his colleagues wrote at the time.

Environmental nonprofits mounted their own pressure campaign encouraging Kerry to further Wall Street’s divestment from the fossil fuel industry.

A March 2021 letter from 145 environmental organizations demanded that Kerry “[end] the flow of private finance” to the fossil fuel industry, specifically requesting that he push asset managers “to divest from pure-play coal, oil, and gas.”

In January of this year, West Virginia divested from BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink has been outspoken in pressuring corporate leaders to commit to investment goals that will undermine reliable energy sources like coal, natural gas and oil under the guise of helping the planet, but at the same time he’s pouring billions in new capital into China, turning a blind eye to abhorrent human rights violations, genocide and that country’s role in creating the COVID-19 global pandemic,” Moore said in a January 17 press release explaining the decision.

Moore told The Epoch Times he has not yet heard from BlackRock.

In his view, the war in Ukraine underscores the vital importance of maintaining domestic energy resources.

“There is power in this type of energy, and I just don’t mean electrification. I mean, power for the countries. And that’s why energy independence is so important,” he told The Epoch Times in a June 8 interview.

Moore claimed it would be “very easy” to get West Virginia to change its increasingly aggressive stance toward financial institutions that have turned against fossil fuels or embraced extreme environmental, social, and governance (ESG).

“All you all need to do is have banks act like banks, asset managers act like asset managers and maximize returns for your shareholders and your company. It’s pretty simple. I mean, that’s kind of how capitalism works,” he said.

The Epoch Times has requested additional information on the six banks from the West Virginia Treasury.

The Epoch Times has also reached out to BlackRock.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/west-virginia-notifies-six-banks-they-may-be-breaking-states-fossil-fuel-anti-boycott-law

McDonald's Shrinks Menu, Gives Up On Healthier Foods To Drive Profit

 McDonald's trimmed nutritious foods from its menu, such as salads, grilled chicken sandwiches, and fruit and yogurt parfaits, a move to streamline operations and offer faster drive-thru times with less staff.

BTIG LLC analyst Peter Saleh told Bloomberg that healthier foods wouldn't return to McDonald's anytime soon, which should increase profitability amid soaring commodity and labor costs. 

McDonald's has lowered drive-thru wait times by 30 seconds since the pandemic because of the menu cut. 

"With the shortage of labor, you're trying to keep your menus as streamlined and as simple as possible," Saleh said. "For many of these restaurants, their menus get bloated with some of these new items, and then you cut it off to help with speed."

The new strategy of a "simplified menu enables speed," said the National Owners Association, a large group of McDonald's franchisees, told Bloomberg. The group said the key to sales growth in these challenging times of soaring costs and lack of labor is an efficient car lane: "We love fast drive-thrus, happy customers, and happy crews." 

Health-conscious consumers are the biggest loser from McDonald's new skinny menu. The company said customers' appetites fuel menu changes: 

"Our transition to a limited menu, involving taking dozens of less popular national and regional items off menus, helped simplify operations for our restaurant crew while also improving our customers' experience.

"We continue to evaluate our menu through this lens to improve order accuracy and speed," McDonald's said.

Food industry research firm Datassential found restaurant menus in the last few years have been reduced by more than 10% on average. At least 60% of restaurants in 2021 shrunk their menus, axing appetizer, dessert, and beverage categories. Burger King is another fast-food restaurant chain that recently removed salads.

Tom Cook, a principal at restaurant consultancy King-Casey, said McDonald's' healthy options were never a significant revenue driver. 

"You always need to have something, some news to drive traffic, particularly these days," said Cook, who worked with McDonald's in the mid-2000s to help introduce a handful of new salads, including one with apples. He said the leafy-green entrees were a big deal at the time — even though management knew they'd never rival burgers sales. The goal with salads was to draw in female diners and especially mothers with children, he said. 

"Here's a case of knowing that it's never going to be popular and sell a lot, but we're going to make a big story out of it to communicate that we're healthy," he said. "It was a very high priority." Fast forward to today, and "they're just probably saying, 'we don't really need those,'" Cook said. -Bloomberg

Lindsay Moyer, a senior nutritionist at the food/health watchdog Center for Science in the Public Interest, said McDonald's is taking "a huge step backward" by axing healthy items at 13,000 US locations. 

"You have to wonder if McDonald's has almost given up trying to pretend they have something to offer people who want healthier items," Moyer said. 

Wonder how McDonald's ESG score will fluctuate after the new unhealthy menu continues making Americans even more obese. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mcdonalds-shrinks-menu-gives-healthier-foods-drive-profit