Search This Blog

Saturday, February 3, 2024

COVID Variants Resist Antibodies From 2nd and 3rd COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines

 All COVID-19 variants, including omicron, are resistant to vaccine-induced antibodies, meaning they are less responsive to the vaccine, as shown in a study published in the journal Vaccine. However, this resistance could be temporarily overcome with additional COVID-19 shots.

“Our data reflect the poor durability of vaccine-induced nAb (neutralizing antibody) responses,” the study authors wrote.
Neutralizing antibodies are those the body makes to prevent the virus—in this case, SARS-CoV-2—from entering and infecting cells.

In the study, antibodies were collected from people who received three doses of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, including the two primary shots and an additional booster. Antibodies collected after the second and third doses were then observed to see how they fared against different COVID-19 variants. After the third dose, resistance to these vaccine-induced antibodies was slightly reduced.

Temporary Neutralizing Effects

Participants were given three doses of the monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, which contained the original Wuhan variant.

Antibodies collected three weeks after the second and third doses had potent neutralizing effects against the original Wuhan COVID-19 variant.

However, these neutralizing antibodies rapidly declined. At four months after the second dose and six months after the third, neutralizing antibody levels had fallen back to prevaccination levels.

Furthermore, the other variants were significantly resistant to antibodies formed after the second and third shots, even at three weeks postvaccination, when the effects of the antibodies are considered the most potent. This means that, compared to the original Wuhan variant, vaccines would have less effect in preventing symptomatic infections against these subsequent variant infections.

The third dose, or booster, was given three to four months after the second mRNA vaccine dose, and its administration slightly reduced the virus’ resistance to the vaccine.

This is surprising, considering that the booster, along with the two mRNA shots given beforehand, were all the same. Despite this, there was a slight change in the virus’ resistance after the third dose.

Senior author of the study Alistair Ramsay, who has a doctorate in microbiology and is a professor of microbiology, immunology, and parasitology at Louisiana State University, told The Epoch Times in an email that the third dose may have improved antibody resistance by strengthening “vaccine-induced immune responses” against parts of the viral protein that was shared between the original strain and the different strains.

The omicron variant had the highest level of resistance.

IgG Class Switching After the 3rd Dose

After the third dose, previously negligible IgG4 and IgG2 antibodies increased significantly.

A rise in IgG4 levels has also been reported in other studies, warning of potential immune tolerance.

Boosting and Increased Risk of Infections

Studies published by the Cleveland Clinic and works out of Harvard University have shown that repeated boosting is related to an increased risk of COVID-19 infections.

Other researchers have stipulated that the increased IgG4 class switching with COVID-19 boosting may put a person at risk of infections from other diseases.

All vaccines have nonspecific effects, as shown in the works of Danish researchers Drs. Christine Stabell Benn and Peter Aaby. Nonspecific effects are effects that go beyond the specific protective effects the vaccines have against their targeted diseases.

For example, the COVID-19 vaccines prevent symptomatic COVID-19 infections; this is its specific effect. Its nonspecific effects are associated effects, such as increased or reduced mortality to other diseases.

Dr. Stabell Benn told The Epoch Times that all vaccines train immunity. While live vaccines train the body to become better at fighting off infections, non-live vaccines tend to make the immune system lazier.

Researchers from Louisiana State University followed 16 uninfected people for over 420 days and matched their antibodies to COVID-19 viruses, both prevaccination and postvaccination, at weekly and monthly intervals.

“We also expected that at some point, later variants (e.g., omicron) would differ so significantly from the pandemic strain that the neutralizing antibody activity generated by the original shots and booster would diminish. That is what we saw,” Mr. Ramsay wrote.
Immune tolerance occurs when the immune system becomes unresponsive to a particular to an antigen, or a particle that is causing disease. In the case of the study, this particle was the spike protein the body makes upon exposure to mRNA vaccines.

The authors also wrote that the induction of IgG4 class switching “may permit extended viral persistence” due to the downregulating effects it has.

In a study led by biologist Alberto Rubillo-Casillas from Autlán Regional Hospital in Mexico, Mr. Rubillo-Casillas argued that the COVID-19 vaccines can potentially induce negative “non-specific effects.”

Typically, some live vaccines, such as the Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, show beneficial nonspecific effects. This means that, apart from protecting a person against tuberculosis, the administration of the BCG vaccine is also linked to improved survival in the recipient. Non-live vaccines—which make up the majority of vaccines given now, including the COVID-19 vaccines—are often associated with negative nonspecific effects.

Marina Zhang is a health writer for The Epoch Times, based in New York. She mainly covers stories on COVID-19 and the healthcare system and has a bachelors in biomedicine from The University of Melbourne.

RETALIATION, BIDEN STYLE

 BY SCOTT JOHNSON

In response to the killing of three American soldiers in a drone strike conducted by Iranian proxy forces, the United States struck over 85 Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Quds Force and Iranian-backed militia targets in Iraq and Syria yesterday. According to Critical Threats, Iranian-backed Iraqi militias said that they will continue attacks targeting US forces until US forces are expelled from Iraq.

Centcom’s press release announcing the strikes is posted here. According to Centcom the 85 targets were struck with more than 125 precision munitions. The facilities that were struck “included command and control operations centers, intelligence centers, rockets, missiles, unmanned aerial vehicle storage, and logistics and munition supply chain facilities of militia groups and their IRGC sponsors who facilitated attacks against U.S. and Coalition forces.”

The White House posted a statement in the name of President Biden. The statement is posted here. It vowed further strikes “at times and places of our choosing.” They let us know all week that it was coming.

We can infer that the Biden administration believes in telegraphing its punches. Marc Thiessen poses a rhetorical question: “How stupid do you have to be to announce you will strike two days in advance and where[?]” It’s smart if you want to minimize the damage done (or to be done).

The administration also believes in repetition. The statement attributed to Biden includes this variation of what has become an administration mantra: “The United States does not seek conflict in the Middle East or anywhere else in the world.” It reminds me of LBJ’s classic one-liner on Vietnam at the time of the Gulf of Tonkin incident: “We still seek no wider war.” Although the intent and the circumstances vary greatly, both statements carry the air of fiasco. Senator Tom Cotton made these points and others in his own way on Fox News last night.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/02/retaliation-biden-style.php

Hamas demands Israel release terror mastermind Marwan Barghouti in exchange for hostages

 Hamas is demanding that Israel release a high-profile Palestinian terror mastermind and political leader who some Palestinians view as a Nelson Mandela-like figure.

As part of the ongoing cease-fire negotiations with Israel, senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan called for the release of Marwan Barghouti.

Barghouti, 64, was a leader of the late Yasser Arafat’s Fatah party, Hamas’ main political rival in the Gaza Strip.

He was arrested in Ramallah in the West Bank in 2002 and is serving multiple life sentences for his role in numerous deadly attacks during the second Palestinian uprising in the early 2000s.

“Hamas wants to show to the Palestinian people that they are not a closed movement. They represent part of the Palestinian social community. They are trying to seem responsible,” Qadoura Fares, who heads the Palestinian Ministry of Prisoner Affairs in the occupied West Bank, said of Hamas’ interest in releasing a popular figure from a rival party.

Many Palestinians see Barghouti as the natural successor to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, whose forces in Gaza were overrun by Hamas in 2007.

Marwan Barghouti pictured during his trial in Tel Aviv in 2002.AP
Hamas is demanding that Israel release the high-profile Palestinian terror mastermind and political leader who some Palestinians view as a Nelson Mandela-like figure.AP
Marwan Barghouti makes the victory sign during a court appearance in 2012.AP

The Palestinians have not held elections since 2006, when Hamas achieved a parliamentary majority.

If Barghouti is released, Fares explained, he could become a candidate that Hamas, Fatah, and other Palestinian factions could rally behind.

An opinion poll published in December showed that Barghouti was still the most popular politician among Palestinians.

Barghouti is still a popular political icon for Palestinians.AP

Meanwhile, the Israeli negotiators are intent on freeing the remaining 100 hostages who have been held by Hamas since the Oct. 7 terror attack.

https://nypost.com/2024/02/03/news/hamas-demands-israel-release-marwan-barghouti/

Biden’s war on working women

 Women are losing a crucial right thanks to unnecessary Washington interference: the right to work independently.

Recently, the Department of Labor (DOL) finalized new regulations to determine the status of independent contractors which strikes at the heart of self-employment and flexibility—something valued most by women.

Under the new DOL rule, self-employed workers and the businesses that hire them must now navigate a confusing six-factor economic reality test to determine their classification as either an employee or an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act. 

Previously, the more independent contractor-friendly rule established during the Trump administration focused on just two core factors —the level of control over work, such as setting schedules, and the opportunity for profit or loss.

Confirmation of both was enough to establish independent status. 

The new Biden rule replaces the clarity of the Trump policy with an opaque, subjective standard that bureaucrats in labor offices will be required to determine.

The White House claims the effort is aimed at companies that purposely misclassify workers to save money.

Under the new Biden plan, which his Department of Labor claims is needed to crack down on employers who misidentify workers, freelancers will now need to meet a cumbersome six-point eligibility standard.AFP via Getty Images

But given the administration’s bent toward categorizing workers as employees (in an effort to ramp up unionization), the prospects of retaining their independent status look bleak for the nation’s 70+ million independent workers.

Over half of freelancers are women.

They earn full-time, part-time, or occasional incomes through various occupations that include—but are not limited to—the gig economy.

Think about virtual assistants, marketing professionals, transcriptionists, makeup artists, entertainers, and medical assistants.

They depend on flexibility to work around their priorities, such as raising families, caring for aging parents and sick spouses, or managing their own illnesses and disabilities.

Self-employment delivers other benefits as well, such as greater satisfaction, better health outcomes, and even more security than traditional jobs.

Women own 12 million businesses, 90% of which are “nonemployer” businesses that don’t rely on formal workers.

Many secure services from independent contractors, particularly from other women.

Women-owned businesses are now at risk if they are forced to hire freelance workers as employees, which studies say can add upwards of 30% to their operating costs.

Consider Monica Wyman, a breast cancer survivor and California business owner.

Her florist/event planning business allowed her to provide for her family and raise three kids while fighting for her life.

Because her work was seasonal and sporadic, Wyman could not afford to hire traditional staff.

Previously, within the Trump era, workers had to meet just two eligibility standards.Getty Images

She contracted with other moms for events as needed.

“I would rotate in different moms who I knew wanted a few hours here and there. It worked really well for all of us,” she says.

Unfortunately, Wyman’s story illustrates how policies like the new DOL rule could devastate to freelancing women and small businesses.

Her business model was placed at risk when California passed Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) in 2019, codifying a restrictive test to determine worker status that led to scores of independent contractors being reclassified.

Self-employed workers in over 600 occupations lost incomes, contracts, gigs, and their livelihoods.

The DOL lamented that it could not mimic the California test, but the new rule will come close. Unlike in California, there are no carveouts for the over 100 special interests — ranging from doctors to recording artists — who managed to secure exemptions from AB5. 

New research led by Mercatus Center economist Liya Palagashvili quantifies the damage that the California Assembly and Governor Gavin Newsom did to their workforce with AB5.

The new DOJ regulations could add upwards of 30% in extra costs for American employers.

Self-employment fell by 10.5%, and overall employment fell by 4.4%, especially in occupations overrepresented by self-employed workers.

Also, it found no robust evidence that reclassified workers were ultimately hired by their clients as employees, refuting that common pushback.

Businesses are likely to hear from labor lawyers and human resources firms—which ironically may be staffed by independent contractors—about compliance with the new DOL regulations.

Whether Congress overturns this rule—and we hope they do—or groups are successful in suing the DOL to stop its enactment, businesses are likely to preemptively cut back or relieve their independent contractor workforce.

The new DOJ rule mimics existing freelancer employment reform in California. Women workers are hit hardest by these changes.Monkey Business – stock.adobe.com

That may be the Biden administration’s goal.

And this will hurt female workers the hardest.

We can’t paint it otherwise.

The DOL rule is anti-self-employment, anti-small business, and anti-woman.

Patrice Onwuka is the director of the Center for Economic Opportunity at Independent Women’s Forum (iwf.org/CEO) and co-host of WMAL’s O’Connor & Company.

https://nypost.com/2024/02/03/opinion/bidens-war-on-working-women/