Search This Blog

Thursday, February 6, 2025

Self-Deportations And Plummeting Crossings - How New Border Policies Impact Arizona

 by Allan Stein via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Yuma Mayor Douglas Nicholls said that border crossings near his city have continued to decline since President Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border on Jan. 20.

Illustration by The Epoch Times, Allan Stein/The Epoch Times, Gettyimages

For the last four days—very specifically in the last four days—we haven’t had any transfers from the San Diego or Tucson sector, which had been happening daily or near daily for the last several months,” Nicholls told The Epoch Times on Jan. 24.

“There’s some definite changes along the flow of traffic, at least in the Yuma sector.”

Nicholls said some illegal immigrants have chosen to “self-deport” rather than be put through the federal immigration system.

Quite a few of them are actually being repatriated to their home countries,” he said, “which is why you’re seeing the reduction in numbers, because people don’t want to make the investment just to be sent back home.”

Nicholls said that the official stance is that most border crossings are related to human smuggling and trafficking, with considerable involvement from Mexico’s drug cartels.

Illegal immigrants pay cartels and smuggling organizations to cross the U.S.—Mexico border; it can cost anywhere from $4,000 to $40,000 depending on the nationality of the border crosser and the destination city. Many illegal immigrants enter the United States in debt to cartels, and spend years in indentured servitude to pay it off.

Trump took multiple border-related executive actions on Jan. 20 after being sworn in, including to kick-start the deportation of criminals and other illegal immigrants.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents quickly began detaining and deporting many known criminal illegal immigrants in major metropolitan areas, including Chicago and Denver.

Nicholls said he supports the plan to deport known criminals. “I don’t know anybody who’s in favor of keeping them here. So I don’t think that that’s really caused any sort of controversy,” he said.

Yuma Mayor Douglas Nicholls during an interview with The Epoch Times in Yuma, Ariz., on Jan. 23, 2025. Allan Stein/The Epoch Times

Cost to Local Industries

Nicholls also noted that Yuma’s health care and agricultural sectors have faced financial challenges due to illegal border crossings. One local hospital has incurred an estimated $26 million in costs for illegal immigrant care, which has yet to be reimbursed.

From a city perspective, we’ve done a pretty good job of isolating costs and not really impacting our budget,” Nicholls said.

“As a community, because of the great work of our Border Patrol and local nonprofits, we’ve only had a couple days in the last four years where migrants were released out in large numbers to the community. We’ve been able to help mitigate those impacts without dramatic costs.”

However, Nicholls said that farming operations along the border in Yuma have suffered a blow with all the illegal border crossings in recent years.

Border Patrol agents in fiscal year 2022 apprehended more than 25,000 illegal immigrants in the Yuma sector, the vast majority of whom crossed the border in an area right next to lettuce farms.

In December 2022, the Yuma County Board of Supervisors, along with Mayor Nicholls, declared countywide states of emergency due to the large number of illegal immigrants gathering on the U.S. side of the border.

The mayor’s proclamation has been in effect since that time.

Illegal immigrants wait to board a U.S. Border Patrol bus to be taken for processing after crossing the border from Mexico, in Yuma, Ariz., on May 22, 2022. Mario Tama/Getty Images

In September 2023, Yuma County Commissioner Jonathan Lines testified before the House Committee on Homeland Security about the financial implications of an unrestricted border on Yuma’s $4 billion agricultural industry.

The surge in illegal immigration has had a devastating effect on this critical industry in Arizona,” Lines told the subcommittee.

“The people crossing illegally travel on foot and urinate and defecate in fields and irrigation canals of the farms after they cross the border, which ruins whatever crop is growing on that particular farm.

“Farmers must abide by stringent food safety rules and this trespass and defecating in production areas renders the crops grown completely unmarketable, thus the crop is destroyed, and farmers must bear this staggering loss.

As a result, farmers in Yuma have had to invest millions since [the Biden administration] took office in crop loss, to hire security and build fences around their farms to protect our nation’s food supply,” Lines testified.

Nicholls said that the window for lettuce from farm to market is very narrow, and consistency is essential because of the short shelf life of produce.

“You need people there when you need people there,” he said. “The 50,000 [migrant] workforce that’s required for winter harvest here is really focused on legal, consistent labor.”

Nicholls said that over the past four years, most illegal immigrants crossing into the Yuma area have wanted to be apprehended by Border Patrol. By doing so, they aimed to enter the system and obtain “some sort of status,” he said.

(Top) Workers tend to lettuce fields in Yuma, Ariz., on Dec. 10, 2021. (Bottom) A farm worker inspects an irrigation line in Yuma, Ariz., on Jan. 23, 2025. Charlotte Cuthbertson, Allan Stein/The Epoch Times

Nicholls said that city officials have not received any official information regarding troop deployments in the Yuma sector.

“What I’m tracking is a perception impact—where people assume our cities are in chaos. They’re not,” he said. “We’ve seen some negative pushback in that regard for tourism, for job attraction, those kind of things.”

Border Town Issues Order

Three hundred and fifty miles east of Yuma lies another border town: Douglas, Arizona, with a population of about 15,600.

On Jan. 27, Douglas Mayor Jose Grijalva signed an emergency proclamation to prepare for the financial impact of the president’s declaration of a national emergency at the border and the deployment of military troops.

With the closing of the southern border, the city of Douglas will see a decrease in revenue sources from sales taxes, tourism, and other areas of commerce,” the proclamation states.

The proclamation didn’t mention that the Douglas Port of Entry remains open 24 hours a day, seven days a week for legal entry into the United States for commercial traffic, non-commercial traffic, and pedestrians.

The statement suggests that the city will experience an increase in costs to assist federal agencies in implementing the president’s executive order.

The proclamation states that although there is currently “no immediate invasion of narcotics and crime within the City of Douglas, I find it necessary and prudent to prepare for the influx of military personnel to the southern border, to take every lawful precaution available in order to protect the health, safety, and welfare of of Douglas’s citizens.”

A Border Patrol truck patrols near the U.S.–Mexico border in Yuma, Ariz., on April 13, 2019. Charlotte Cuthbertson/The Epoch Times

The city pledges to cooperate with county, state, and federal officials to “protect our borders from illegal entry while protecting our economy.”

On Jan. 22, the defense department announced the deployment of 1,500 active-duty service members, along with additional air and intelligence assets, to the southern border to assist troops already conducting enforcement operations in the region.

The announcement was made approximately 36 hours after Trump signed an executive order instructing the Pentagon to respond to the crisis at the border.

New State Law

Communities are also preparing for the effects of Arizona’s Proposition 314, which was approved by 65 percent of voters in the November election.

This measure makes it a state crime for noncitizens to enter Arizona from any location other than a port of entry, which allows state and local police to make arrests.

The measure also allows Arizona state judges to order deportations.

State agencies must check an individual’s immigration status via the E-Verify program before allowing enrollment in financial aid programs or public welfare. It’s a crime to submit false information to evade the E-Verify program.

Under the proposition, it’s a Class 2 felony if a person knowingly sells fentanyl and it results in the death of another person.

The Yuma County Sheriff’s Office is currently awaiting further guidance from the county attorney, who is working with relevant parties to establish policies and procedures for sheriffs concerning Proposition 314.

Remote Desert Town

In the desert town of Ajo, Arizona, located 43 miles from the state’s 372-mile-long southern border with Mexico, life tends to move at a slower step.

However, resident Charlie Wolfe believes it is only a matter of time before the impact of the new administration’s border policies become apparent.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/self-deportations-and-plummeting-crossings-how-new-border-policies-impact-arizona

NYC hospitals tell staff not to hide patients from ICE

 The city’s public hospital system warned staff not to help patients avoid Immigration and Custom Enforcement agents — triggering Democratic politicians who want the order reversed.

NYC Health + Hospitals issued the guidance in a memo on Jan 16, just days before President Donald Trump issued a federal order opening up “sensitive locations” to raids by federal immigration authorities, including schools, churches, hospitals and shelters.

“What we have seen out of this administration for the past two weeks is not about upholding our laws. This is about fear and chaos,” state Sen. Zellnor Myrie said at a news conference outside Kings Hospital on Thursday.

“We know that people are afraid and that they’re not showing up [to hospitals].”

Myrie called on Mayor Eric Adams to rescind the “inflammatory and redundant” hospital policy as he and other Democratic lawmakers fight to keep them from the feds.

State Sen. Zellnor Myrie, who was joined by fellow Dem lawmakers outside Kings County Hospital on Thursday, slapped down the edict.Gabriella Bass
According to a City Hall source, the memo told workers in the hospitals that it is “illegal to intentionally protect a person who is in the United States unlawfully from detention” and warned “you should not try to actively help a person avoid being found by ICE.”

The memo appears to be following a Jan. 13 guidance memo that City Hall sent to all city agencies.

“It is important to understand that taking actions that are intended to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection a person who is in the United States unlawfully is a federal crime,” the City Hall legal memo, obtained by The Post, said. “You cannot take affirmative steps that are intended to help a person avoid being found by ICE.”

City Hall spokesperson Kayla Mamelak downplayed the lawmakers’ concerns, saying that the mayor has been firm that “everyone should feel comfortable sending their children to school, seeking medical care or reporting crimes, regardless of their immigration status.”

The memo tells staff it is “illegal to intentionally protect a person who is in the United States unlawfully from detention” and goes on to say “you should not try to actively help a person avoid being found by ICE,” a city hall source confirmed.U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement via Getty Images

“The claim that New York City is instructing city employees to cooperate with ICE for civil enforcement spreads misinformation that only fuels anxiety within immigrant communities,” Mamelak said.

“We are responsible for safeguarding the well-being of our city staff, which is why we have directed city employees not to put themselves in harm’s way during federal immigration enforcement interactions.”

Employees were instructed to contact their legal counsel in such situations and to avoid verbal or physical altercations, as this could “compromise their safety and hinder critical city services,” Mamelak said.

Myrie, who is also running for New York City mayor, argued that the memo is another ploy by Hizzoner to curry favor with the Trump administration in a bid to get a presidential pardon for corruption charges.

The embattled mayor raised eyebrows among fellow Dems in recent weeks after rushing to DC in the middle of the night to attend Trump’s inauguration and again heading to the Capitol on Thursday to attend a prayer breakfast where the president delivered remarks.

Myrie, who is also running for New York City Mayor, argued that the memo is yet another ploy by Hizzoner to curry favor with the Trump administration to get a pardon for his corruption case.Getty Images

Adams also refused to speak out against the president on potential tariffs on Mexico and Canada just days after his’s attorneys met with US Department of Justice officials as they try to get prosecutors to drop federal corruption charges against him.

“Instead of having a mayor willing to stand up to this president and protect vulnerable New Yorkers, we have a mayor that’s issuing guidance saying we will do whatever you want President Trump no matter what the implication,” Myrie said.

“We are calling on him today to rescind the guidance he has issued to the Health + Hospitals and to stand up for New Yorkers who are vulnerable.”

NYC Health + Hospitals told The Post that its focus is the safety of patients and employees.

“The policy we sent to all staff sets forth clear and understandable steps to take if an enforcement agent enters the facility, and it ensures the safety of our staff — who are on the frontlines everyday— by making sure they understand the law,” department spokesperson Christopher Miller said.

NYC Health + Hospitals does not require patients to share information about their immigration status to receive health care and cannot give out patient information to anyone else without specifically being authorized to do so by law, the spokesperson said.

City Hall spokesperson Kayla Mamelak told The Post that Mayor Eric Adams has been firm that “everyone should feel comfortable sending their children to school, seeking medical care or reporting crimes, regardless of their immigration status.”Paul Martinka

City lawmaker and council education committee chair Rita Joseph (D-Brooklyn) said the guidance would have devastating affect on schools that had previously been safe havens.

“We have to be reassured that if [ICE] come to schools, nothing will happen to them, [but] that security was taken away by the Trump administration by taking away sensitive locations,” she told The Post. 

“Why are we here at a hospital? Churches were safe havens, schools were safe havens. Those safety nets were taken away. So, if I’m undocumented, I’m not walking my child to school. I don’t know where ICE is around that surrounding.”

It was unclear if the Department of Education had issued similar guidance to employees but a spokesperson said the only guidance distributed from the city school system is available on its website.

https://nypost.com/2025/02/06/us-news/nyc-hospitals-tell-staff-not-to-hide-patients-from-ice-triggering-furious-dems-fear-and-chaos/

Can science journalism get over its Trump Derangement Syndrome?

 Scientific American, the oldest continually published magazine in the US, once prided itself on explaining science to the public through scholarly reporting, knowledgeable research and carefully crafted articles. Since its founding in 1845, it has published articles by more than 200 Nobel laureates. Yet for some time now, it has been wandering from science to politics.

A recent op-ed, titled ‘How feminism can guide climate change by action’, demonstrates how completely off the rails this once prestigious magazine has gone. To say the article is simply ‘bad science’ would not be accurate. There is no science in it at all. Here is a small sample:

‘Feminism gives us the analysis, tools and movement to create a better climate future… Climate policymaking needs to take into account the expertise that women, including indigenous and rural women, bring to bear on issues like preserving ecosystems and environmentally sustainable agriculture… We must redistribute resources away from male-dominated, environmentally harmful economic activities towards those prioritising women’s employment, regeneration and care for both people and ecosystems.’

Fans of Scientific American might have hoped that this kind of activist journalism would leave the magazine along with former editor Laura Helmuth, who finished her nearly five-year tenure in November. Instead, it appears that little has changed. Other articles published since her departure include a defence of puberty blockers (which makes the striking claim that ‘the underlying principles of trans [healthcare] could make everyone healthier’) and a first-person perspective of a Just Stop Oil campaigner’s arrest.

Under Helmuth, the magazine broke with its 175-year-old tradition of impartiality when it endorsed the candidacy of Joe Biden in 2020, followed by Kamala Harris in 2024. Fittingly, Helmuth’s resignation followed one of the most severe cases of Trump Derangement Syndrome witnessed during November’s election, which she shared with the world on Bluesky. ‘I apologise to younger voters that my Gen X is so full of fucking fascists’, Helmuth wrote after Trump’s re-election. She then added, for good measure:


‘Every four years I remember why I left Indiana (where I grew up) and remember why I respect the people who stayed and are trying to make it less racist and sexist. The moral arc of the universe is not going to bend itself… Solidarity to everybody whose meanest, dumbest, most bigoted classmates are celebrating early results because fuck them to the Moon and back.’

Helmuth’s intemperate remarks raise several questions. First, what was she thinking? Presumably, to avoid charges of bias, you’d think the editor of a major scientific magazine would at least try to maintain a modicum of discretion in their public comments. Did she not realise that her comments might put some people off Scientific American who didn’t happen to share her politics? One also wonders what the board of Springer Nature, who own Scientific American, saw in Helmuth that led her to become just the ninth editor in the magazine’s long and storied history. It can’t have been for an impartial, objective approach.

In truth, Helmuth’s social-media rants and political endorsements are merely a symptom of the broader demise of Scientific American. It is hard to imagine now but this is the same magazine that published Albert Einstein’s generalised theory of gravitation and Nikola Tesla on the possibility of electro-static generators.

A more recent sample of the Scientific American’s work under Helmuth would find headlines such as ‘Modern mathematics confronts its white, patriarchal past’, ‘Denial of evolution is a form of white supremacy’, and a landmark takedown of Star Wars titled ‘Why the term JEDI is problematic for describing programmes that promote justice, equity, diversity and inclusion’.


Not content with publishing woke, unscientific nonsense, Scientific American has at times been little more than a mouthpiece for progressive and government orthodoxies. During the pandemic, it published multiple articles supposedly ‘debunking’ the lab-leak theory – now all but accepted by the majority of Western governments. It even trashed the Cass Review, which highlighted the lack of scientific evidence for the treatments given out to young people by Britain’s gender-identity services.

Perhaps the lowest point for Scientific American was in 2021, following the death of legendary evolutionary biologist EO Wilson. Rather than celebrate Wilson, Scientific American excoriated him over his ‘dangerous ideas’ and ‘problematic beliefs’. Helmuth presumably had no idea that Wilson, a two-time Pulitzer Prize winner and recipient of the Crafoord Prize from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (the equivalent of a Nobel Prize for fields not covered by the Nobel Awards), had published his ‘dangerous ideas’ and ‘problematic beliefs’ in the Scientific American over several decades.

Scientific American is far from alone in abandoning science for wokery, of course. Formerly reputable publications, such as Nature, the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet and the British Medical Journal, just to name a few, now routinely feature articles replete with ‘progressive’ agitprop.

It’s safe to say that the golden age of scientific journals is over. The fall of Scientific American proves that the old truism – that when you introduce science into politics, you are left only with politics – works just as well in the reverse. Science will struggle to recover from these attempts to politicise it.