Search This Blog

Thursday, February 6, 2025

East Hampton officials reassure residents they won’t deport illegal maids, landscapers, nannies

 East Hampton government officials are trying to quell wealthy residents’ fears that local police could deport illegal migrants from the tony town — many of whom work as maids, landscapers, and nannies to support the luxurious lifestyles of the well-off locals.

Village and town leaders held a special community meeting on Tuesday to assure citizens of Long Island’s exclusive nabe — where the median property value is $2 million — that their hired help are not on their radar when it comes to deportation. 

East Hampton Village Police Chief Jeffrey Erickson stressed that local law enforcement do not have authority to enforce federal law — and won’t hold onto undocumented immigrants if given an ICE detainer.

Federal law enforcement partners are continuing to assist DHS with their immigration enforcement efforts in a photo from Jan. 29.ATFNewYork/X

“If it is an ICE detainer or an administrative warrant, we do not have the authority, we will not hold them,” Erickson told a concerned resident, according to the East Hampton Star.

Skip Ad
The video player is currently playing an ad.

The sentiment was echoed by East Hampton Town Police Chief Michael Sarlo at a separate meeting.

“Our level of participation and cooperation with ICE lies in criminal matters,” Sarlo told the town board at a meeting Tuesday.

“I haven’t seen an ICE agent in this town in I can’t tell you how long.”

“You see what I’m wearing here,” Sarlo said dramatically pointing to his firearm, “People who wear this and put this on don’t interfere with other people who wear this and put this on because then people die. You don’t step in front of an Immigration Enforcement officer in uniform with a gun and a badge who’s taking his action.”

“That’s for attorneys to get involved in and that is for policies and procedures through the state to get involved,” he added.

East Hampton Village Police Chief Jeffrey Erickson emphasized that there are extremely limited circumstances in which his department will cooperate with ICE.News 12 Long Island

Some East Hampton residents were grateful for the reassurance that their undocumented employees and neighbors will be able to avoid deportation.

“I think it’s a very good idea and very helpful considering we have a very large community here, and people rely on them,” Alex Lovett, of East Hampton, told News12.

“They’ve been a vital part of the community for a very long time,” she empathized.

The local officials said a major purpose for the small-scale messaging campaign is to assure undocumented residents that they can interact with police without fear of deportation.

“If they’re a victim of a crime, we don’t want them to fear the police, we want them to call us so we can protect them,” Erickson said in an interview to the local news station.

East Hampton officials held two meetings to inform and reassure residents that they will not be carrying out deportations with local police.News 12 Long Island

Also on Tuesday, the East Hampton Town Board held a two-hour public hearing where members of the Latino community expressed their concerns over the Trump administration’s new immigration policies.

Sandra Melendez — an East Hampton Village trustee, immigration attorney, and Spanish speaker –addressed the community and stressed that they are not obligated to cooperate with ICE, the local paper reported.

At that town board hearing Councilwoman Cate Rogers stated that the well-heeled townies will remain vigilant as the federal government attempts to enforce immigration law.

“The rules are being rewritten by the second,” the councilwoman said, according to the East Hampton Star. “I want to assure everyone that this is the beginning of a conversation. It’s not a one-and-done statement, ‘Okay we did our job let’s move on.’ We’re invested. We’re your neighbors, and we’re with you.”

This resistance-style approach taken by the officials in East Hampton is a far cry from the actions taken by authorities elsewhere on Long Island.

Earlier this week, Nassau County police were granted authority to help ICE arrest criminal migrants under a new agreement with the Trump administration.

Ten detectives were granted the authority from County Executive Bruce Blakeman and will coordinate with ICE.

“Our detectives will arrest illegal immigrants engaged in criminal activity. We want to make sure these people are locked up and deported,” Blakeman told The Post.

“We don’t want illegal immigrants roaming around our community committing crimes. We don’t want them in our community.”

https://nypost.com/2025/02/06/us-news/east-hampton-officials-reassure-residents-that-officers-wont-deport-illegal-migrants/

Jobs Report Will Finally Capture Surge In Illegals, Lead To Another Big Negative Payrolls Revision

 Remember last August when the Biden admin finally admitted it had been rigging the jobs number, when as part of its preliminary revision it vaporized 818K jobs in the past year that were never actually added, a historical negative revision (the second biggest on record) which the Fed used as justification for its panicked jumbo 50bps rate cut just a few weeks later?

Well, tomorrow that revision - along with a dramatic increase in the US population estimate by 3.5 million primarily to reflect the surge in illegal immigration - will finally flow through fully into the jobs report, as part of a bigger overhaul of the labor market by the now-Trumpian Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the results could be dramatic.

First, some background.

Each year the US Census Bureau adjusts the weights in the Current Population Survey – the source data for labor-force statistics like the unemployment rate – incorporating updated estimates of the population’s size and composition. In the latest vintage, the Census modified its approach to estimating net international migration - for obvious reasons, the main of which being that for the past 4 years the US effectively had no southern border - which had the effect of substantially boosting its estimate of the US population since 2020.

Bureau of Labor Statistics employment data for January (due for release Feb. 7) will reflect these adjustments, capturing the cumulative undercounting of the population relative to the last vintage of Census estimates. 

That, according to Bloomberg, could lead to a large population adjustment this year which could raise the aggregate unemployment rate by raising the weight of recent immigrants, who tend to have higher unemployment rates than the general population. Overall, Bloomberg expects population adjustments to lift January’s unemployment rate by 5 basis points (which as everyone not named Matt Yglesias knows, is not percent but rather one hundredth of a percent).

Here are the details according to Bloomberg:

  • The latest vintage of the Census Bureau’s population estimates raised the level of the civilian noninstitutional population for December 2024 by around 3.6 million relative to the prior vintage a year earlier.
    • The main reason was changes to the methodology for estimating net immigration. Historically, Census has relied on American Community Survey (ACS) data for its estimates of net international migration. But this approach posed two challenges:

      • First, the ACS data is lagged. For each vintage of population estimates, Census had ACS immigration information only for the previous year, so the data failed to capture very recent trends.

      • Second, ACS misses some migrants. This is supported by the divergence in recent years between the ACS immigration estimates and immigration totals from administrative data from other parts of the government.

    • To address this, Census adjusted its methodology to incorporate 75% of the difference between the sum of immigration totals from the administrative data and the ACS data. That resulted in a higher estimate for net immigration, lifting the estimate of the total population from 2020-2024.

  • Of that 3.6 million, roughly 3 million are 16 and older – the relevant population for the BLS unemployment statistics.

  • Historically, adjustments to the population — even relatively large ones — haven’t had much impact on the unemployment rate.In some cases the adjustments have resulted in significant changes to labor-force participation or employment rates, but usually there have been offsetting effects that dampen any change.

  • But for tomorrow's report there is a risk that the updated immigration estimates could lift the unemployment rate more visibly because the adjustment could increase the survey weight of workers with a higher unemployment rate.

Bottom line: Adjustments to the population controls in January’s household survey to boost the unemployment rate by ~5 bps. Together with Bloomberg's forecast of a decline in government jobs, the unemployment rate is expected to edge up to 4.16% in January from 4.09% a month earlier.

There's more: since the increase in the population will also raise the level of the labor force and employmentthe updated employment level will imply average monthly job growth of around 150k-170k last year — narrowing the gap between the employment figures from the household survey and the estimates from the BLS’ establishment survey. 

And indeed, Bloomberg cautions that the separate, benchmarking process in the establishment survey is likely to result in significant downward revisions to nonfarm-payrolls data, bringing average monthly job growth last year down to about 150k, from around 180k before revisions. 

As Standard Chartered's Steve Englander writes (full note available to pro subs), according to the abovementioned BLS estimates as of August 2024, March 2024 NFP is likely to be revised down by 818k after benchmarking to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). However, further QCEW revisions since August make a 670k downward NFP revision more likely, so the overall gap between NFP and CPS (as of end-2024) will be reduced to about 2mn from 4.3mn.

The adjustment supports Englander's - and our - view that the surge in illegal aliens is more likely to be captured in NFP than CPS, as many of these workers were able to obtain employment authorization and work "legally" in the country. The household survey has likely understated annual employment growth by c.0.5mn during the past three years.

One problem the BLS will face is that participation rates and employment-to-population ratios for undocumented immigrants are highly uncertain. The BLS uses administrative data from other sources to bulk up population underestimates from standard Census and American Community Survey sources. However, no survey is likely to capture labor-force participation and employment among undocumented immigrants, so the BLS will probably have to make some assumptions based on legal immigrants and native-born labor-market participants. In addition, according to BLS methodology undocumented immigrants who have not been in contact with US Customs and Border Protection agents are unlikely to show up in either census population counts or BLS household employment. While these fully under-the-radar immigrants are a minority, CBO estimated them at c.800k for 2024.

An additional quirk is that the BLS puts most of its population revisions into each year’s January release (data to be released on 7 February). Its practice has been to introduce an abrupt upward or downward jump in January levels to capture the new population controls. This is arbitrary and does not align with monthly census population estimates. In practice, this means that m/m changes in population, employment, unemployment and labor-force numbers are largely meaningless, as they miss the big January shift. The 12M, 24M and 36M changes embed the population changes so they are relevant to the analysis. Ratios such as the unemployment rate, participation rate and employment to population remain meaningful on a m/m basis.

More to the point, as we first correctly reported and  as the BLS subsequently admitted in August 2024, the March 2024 NFP would be revised down by 818k after benchmarking to the QCEW. However, subsequent QCEW revisions suggest a benchmark NFP reduction of around 670k. The overall gap between NFP and CPS will be reduced to 2.0mn from 4.3mn. 

Of course, that's not the full story. As we also reported in December, the subsequent QCEW release pointed to en even much weaker Q2-2024 employment growth than signalled by NFP. (see "Biden Lied About Everything: Philly Fed Finds All Jobs "Created" In Q2 Were Fake"). However, the benchmark revision will not correct for the overstatement of payrolls in Q2-2024 until the second quarter of 2026, or more than a year into the future, leaving us with another year of NFP distortions! 

Yes, dear readers, the full extent of the labor market devastation under Biden - and just how fabricated the jobs report truly has been - will continue to be unveiled for years to come, long after Biden himself is gone.

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/tomorrows-jobs-report-will-finally-capture-surge-illegal-aliens-lead-another-negative

Rubio To Skip G20 In Protest Against South Africa's DEI And Climate Policies

 by Andrew Thornebrooke via The Epoch Times,

Secretary of State Marco Rubio will not attend the G20 in protest against the hosting nation South Africa’s policies regarding land expropriation and climate.

In a post on social media platform X, Rubio accused South Africa of promoting “DEI and climate change,” which he suggested was a form of “anti-Americanism.”

“South Africa is doing very bad things,” Rubio said. “Expropriating private property. Using G20 to promote ‘solidarity, equality, and sustainability.’”

Rubio’s absence means that the United States may not be represented when leaders of the G20 meet in Johannesburg later in the year to coordinate on international economic issues.

Rubio’s comments echo similar remarks made by President Donald Trump over the weekend, in which the president accused South Africa of engaging in “a massive Human Rights violation” by allowing the government to expropriate private land for public use and vowed to cut U.S. funding to South Africa.

Those remarks targeted two South African laws: the 2024 Expropriation Act and the 2025 Expropriation Bill, which updated the circumstances under which the government could reclaim private property for public use.

The 2024 act repeals an Apartheid-era law that allowed the government to seize private land and was previously widely used against black South Africans.

The new law forbids individuals from being arbitrarily divested from their property, orders the government to pay fair market value for any property taken, and directs that expropriation be conducted equitably.

Some critics of the law, including billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk, who emigrated from South Africa, say that the law unfairly targets white South Africans.

No race is explicitly targeted by the law, but it does require that previous land seizures based on race, such as those made during Apartheid, be taken into account when determining the appropriateness of land expropriations.

There is also the issue that more than 70 percent of private farmland in South Africa is owned by the white population, which accounts for only about 7 percent of South Africa’s overall population.

As such, the law may disproportionately impact them.

The 2025 bill, meanwhile, established that there are circumstances in which the government can seize private property without compensation.

Such circumstances include when the land has been abandoned, when the land is worth less than state investments in it, or when the property poses a direct health or safety risk.

The bill also requires that the government seek to negotiate compensation and the other terms of acquiring private property from the owner before it can resort to expropriation.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/rubio-skip-g20-protest-against-south-africas-dei-and-climate-policies

BD bids farewell to its diagnostic, bioscience divisions with company split

 After parting ways with its diabetes franchise nearly three years ago, BD is slimming down even further with a plan to divest its diagnostic and biosciences businesses as the company nears the finish line in its five-year “BD 2025” strategy.

The “New BD,” as the company describes it, will continue on as a pure-play medtech company with its enterprises in medical essentials—such as its ubiquitous hardware for collecting blood samples and delivering IV medications, which number in the tens of billions of units per year—as well as its interventional devices and connected care programs, with the latter including the recent acquisitions from Edwards Lifesciences.

The company will also retain its pharmaceutical systems unit, to be renamed biopharma systems, with its focus on developing delivery devices for the makers of drugs and biologics—including GLP-1s and patient-operated injectors, which BD has estimated will grow into a billion-dollar business by 2030.

Meanwhile, the outgoing combination of diagnostic solutions and biosciences will span a catalog that brought in about $3.4 billion in 2024 sales. It will include tests for infectious disease and cervical cancer screening as well as flow cytometry instruments and single-cell multiomics tools used in research.

“We believe the separation will position New BD as a differentiated MedTech leader and enable optimized investment to accelerate our innovation pipeline and ongoing margin enhancement through BD Excellence to further fund growth,” President and CEO Tom Polen said in a statement.

“We believe Biosciences and Diagnostic Solutions is expected to deliver substantial value as a pure-play leader in life sciences and will be well-positioned to execute on its unique and compelling solutions and growth opportunities,” Polen added.

The company said the separation decision has been in the works since early 2024 and will support the future New BD in its plans to pursue more tuck-in acquisitions, while focusing primarily on healthcare providers and patient end markets. All together, its divisions brought in about $17.8 billion in 2024.

The BD 2025 plan, which kicked off in 2020, set goals of long-term, compounded annual revenue growth of 5.5% or more while focusing on high-growth and high-margin markets.

BD's board of directors has approved the transaction and said it is open to pursuing a spinoff or an outright sale, among other options. The company said it expects to announce more specifics by the close of its 2025 fiscal calendar, ending Sept. 30, with the move being completed by the end of the year to follow.

BD also reported its first-quarter earnings results for fiscal 2025, with companywide revenues of $5.17 billion equating to a 9.8% reported gain, or 3.9% organic when accounting for currency changes and the impact of acquisitions and divestitures during their first 12 months.

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/bd-bids-farewell-its-diagnostic-bioscience-divisions-company-split

Lilly's next R&D focus: Testing incretin meds in neuro, immunology

 Eli Lilly has invested heavily into obesity, dominating the landscape—alongside semaglutide maker Novo Nordisk—with its blockbuster molecule tirzepatide. Now, with a pipeline chock-full of numerous incretin therapies, the Big Pharma's new strategy will be to test some of those drugs across neurology and immunology indications.

"A new focus area first in 2025 will be to study potential new applications of incretin biology across diseases in neuroscience and immunology,” Lilly’s chief scientific officer Daniel Skovronsky, M.D., Ph.D., said during a Feb. 6 investor call. “With a pipeline of incretins in clinical development and deep scientific expertise in this space, Lilly is well positioned to match the biologic properties of specific molecules to the desired indications being studied.”

The pharma plans to launch several clinical trials “assessing potential benefits” of Lilly’s existing incretins across areas that “could include brain health, substance use disorder, pain, neuropsychiatry and inflammation,” Skovronsky explained.

“We'll be prepared to move rapidly into phase 3 trials based on clinical data and where our conviction is high,” the CSO added.

Lilly has invested billions into manufacturing capabilities to support the launch of obesity drug Zepbound and other phase 3 assets in cardiometabolic diseases, Patrik Jonsson, chief customer officer and president of diabetes and obesity, said last summer.

This massive investment and established infrastructure could now be used to support the company's potential expansion into other therapeutic landscapes.

The company did not elaborate further on what incretin drugs it plans to test.

Incretins are hormones that are released after eating, affecting the body’s insulin response.

Eli Lilly's approved incretin therapy is tirzepatide, an injectable dual GLP-1 and GIP receptor sold as Mounjaro for diabetes and Zepbound for weight loss and, most recently, obstructive sleep apnea. Tirzepatide is currently awaiting an FDA decision for use in heart failure preserved ejection fraction, as well.

The company also boasts the clinical-stage prospect retatrutide, a triple-hormone-receptor agonist that targets GLP-1, GIP and glucagon. In a phase 2 trial obesity trial, the investigational candidate was tied to a 24% mean reduction in weight, or the equivalent of 58 pounds, after 48 weeks.

After seeing the data, Lilly pressed the gas, entering retatrutide into a phase 3 program—dubbed TRIUMPH—that is testing the candidate out in chronic weight management, obstructive sleep apnea and knee osteoarthritis among people with obesity and who are overweight.

The pharma giant expects top-line readouts for both the obesity and osteoarthritis trials sometime this year, according to the company’s quarterly presentation Thursday. Lilly had previously said data were anticipated in early 2026.   

“We believe this potential new medicine can deliver even more weight loss than tirzepatide and could potentially provide additional health benefits,” Skovronsky said on the investor call.

Furthermore, the company houses orforglipron, an investigational daily oral nonpeptide GLP-1 receptor agonist being tested in late-stage trials for obesity and obstructive sleep apnea. Lilly also plans to launch a phase 3 study for the candidate in hypertension this year. 

“I’m excited that this year we're looking forward to reading out multiple orforglipron trials," Skovronsky said. "We expect to see data from up to five studies in Type 2 diabetes and two studies in obesity. Our goal is to generate [an] efficacy, safety and tolerability profile that is similar to that of an injectable, single-acting GLP-1, but through an orally available medicine.”

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/eli-lillys-new-rd-strategy-testing-out-obesity-drugs-neuro-immunology

Trump Nukes All Govt-MSM Contracts After Politico Firestorm, Will Axe 97% Of USAID Staff

 In light of the firestorm over tens of millions of dollars going from the US government to various media outlets in the form of subscriptions, particularly Politico, President Trump has directed the General Services Administration to terminate "every single media contract" expensed by the agency, according to an email obtained by Axios.

Photo via @bennyjohnson

"GSA team, please do two things," the email begins.

  • Pull all contracts for Politico, BBC, E&E (Politico sub) and Bloomberg
  • Pull all media contracts for just GSA - cancel every single media contract today for GSA only.

The move comes after internet sleuths discovered tens of millions of dollars going towards Politico Pro subscriptions, with particular focus on one $8 million allocation.

On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the executive branch would cancel their contract with Politico...

...and today we find that it goes much further than just the rag that laundered the deep state's '51 intel officials' Hunter Biden laptop propaganda. For example, the NY Times was also cut off.

Politico responded on Thursday, claiming that they have "never received any government funding — no subsidies, no grants, no handouts. Not one dime, ever, in 18 years."

No, just tens of millions in Politico Pro subscriptions from the government. Like Hunter Biden received $200,000 for a painting of his excrement, which was totally not influence peddling.

Deep Cuts To USAID

Meanwhile, the White House is also planning to cut USAID's staff from roughly 10,000 employees to just 294 - a 97% reduction, after Elon Musk's DOGE team revealed that the international aid organization has essentially been funding woke pet projects and anti-American activities.

On Tuesday, the administration put a stop on all USAID work and placed all employees on leave, with thousands of overseas workers to be recalled within 30 days.

According to Reuters, Secretary of State Marco Rubio - who was placed in charge of USAID earlier this week, said that the Trump administration was identifying and designating critical programs that would be exempted from the stop work order and deep cuts.

According to the report, over 2/3 of USAID's workers are located outside the United States. As of 2023, the 'aid' organization managed more than $40 billion in projects. USAID's website informed people that as of midnight on Friday, February 7, "all USAID direct hire personnel will be placed on administrative leave globally, with the exception of designated personnel responsible for mission-critical functions, core leadership and specially designated programs."

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-nukes-all-govt-msm-contracts-after-politico-firestorm-will-axe-97-usaid-staff

Soros-funded Dems suddenly upset by billionaires in government

 Sometimes you have to laugh. Earlier this week, Sen. Chuck Schumer threw his toys out of the stroller in a social media post. He wrote: “An unelected shadow government is conducting a hostile takeover of the federal government.”

To the extent that this histrionic claim makes any sense we must guess that Schumer was talking about the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Schumer seemed especially angry about the closure of USAID. He went on to grouse about Donald Trump and his “billionaire buddies.”

Happily for those of us who keep an eye on such things, Schumer’s rant was reposted by Alex Soros.

Not many readers will have heard of Alex Soros. But I can tell you this: he is not a man who got where he did simply by hard work.

Alex is the son of multi-billionaire investor and dark-money donor George Soros. He is also now engaged to former Hilary Clinton aide Huma Abedin (who, for some reason, ditched Anthony Wiener some time back).

Anyone who follows Soros Jr. on social media will have noticed that he gets some pretty amazing photo opportunities. One day he’s posting a photo of himself with Nancy Pelosi. Next he’s standing next to Chuck Schumer. Another day he’s with Kamala or Tim Walz (remember him?). Still another day he’s with Pete Buttigieg or Elizabeth Warren.

What a charmed life.

But why did all these people spend recent years shimmying up to Alex Soros? Is it the man’s charisma, brains, insight and originality? No, of course not. It’s because his father is a billionaire radical-left-wing investor, and so is he.

Everyone knew that it was pay-to-play with the Democrats. If you or I asked every member of the Democrat high command for a meeting, it’s unlikely we’d get one. But change your name to Soros and you might get a different result.

So it’s not like So it’s not like Schumer & co. care about non-elected people having any say in government. It’s just that they don’t like it — in fact they really hate it — when it isn’t their guys.

There is no other principle here. The Dems who object to the work of DOGE are just angry that for once it isn’t their side that’s calling the shots.

Take the shuttering of USAID. For the Dems, this was one of their agencies. One of those taxpayer-funded boondoggles that allowed Democrats to pursue and further their own interests. Not America’s interests. Their own interests. As bizarre as some of them were.

None of it came cheap. In the fiscal year 2023 USAID’s budget totaled some $40 billion. To put that in context, that is roughly the GDP of a small country like Estonia.

The agency was run like a small country too. Many years ago Samantha Power came to prominence for a book she wrote on genocide. She was against it — like most people — but the Democrats were in need of a person who could claim some moral heft. And so Samantha Power rose up the ranks and ended up as US Ambassador to the United Nations under Barack Obama. During which time she failed to prevent any genocides. But that is another matter.

In recent years, Power has been the head of USAID. And during that time she has enjoyed the lovely meeting place where radical left wing billionaire foundations and Democrat activist politics meet.

During her time as the head of USAID, Power had multiple meetings with the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and — of course — the Soros family’s Open Society Foundation.

This got passed off as an innocent little meeting of minds. Power claimed that she merely aimed to “Work with philanthropies and the private sector to catalyze resources to tackle these complex global challenges is important to improving the quality of life for people around the world.”

Because of course Power does a fine line in pre-2025 swamp gobbledygook.

But the agency which she presided over did things that have nothing to do with the US national interest.

It’s not just the $1.5 million for DEI in Serbia. Or the $2.5 million for electric vehicle charging stations in Vietnam. Nor is it merely the half a million dollars bunged to Indonesian coffee companies so that they could meet “gender goals.” Or even the millions of dollars sent to the Taliban to provide contraceptives and condoms. Although that one could be said to have its upsides.

It´s the fact that we now know that USAID and other wasteful departments were fixing and nixing things behind the scenes. Take the discovery that USAID was funneling millions of dollars every year to friendly media outlets like Politico.

It’s a neat trick that. You mute certain media that don’t favor you while essentially financing the media that do.

And of course the favor gets returned. Who did Power give her gracious, softball, exit-interview to when leaving USAID? Why Politico of course. There she boasted of how hard she had worked, warned the incoming administration about what they should do and claimed that USAID is “an agency that has thousands of people around the world representing the United States.”

But are they? Were they? The question really is — which vision of the United States did USAID represent?

You can tell a lot by what USAID had already decided to scrub from its website. As archived versions of it still show, USAID’s DEI strategy promised that the agency was committed “to improving and enhancing diversity throughout the Agency, enhancing inclusion and equity for everyone in the workplace, and strengthening accountability for promoting and sustaining a diverse workforce and an inclusive Agency culture.”

That isn’t representing the United States around the world. It is representing a narrow and now very dated view around the world. A view that has nothing to do with the founding principles or present priorities of this country.

If some of the Dems are unhappy with DOGE’s savings, perhaps they could simply note one thing. Not just what it’s like when the boot is on the other foot. But the fact that it was their ideologically-driven, mega-donor-pushed funding-splurge that made this necessary.

https://nypost.com/2025/02/06/opinion/soros-funded-dems-suddenly-upset-by-billionaires-in-government/