Search This Blog

Sunday, March 15, 2026

The ‘Religion of Peace’ Sure Likes to Kill and Maim

by J.B. Shurk 

Since President Trump initiated strikes on Iran’s theocratic, totalitarian regime two weeks ago, members of the so-called “religion of peace” have been carrying out revenge killings across the United States. 

On March 1, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Senegal wearing a “Property of Allah” hoodie opened fire on patrons having fun at an Austin, Texas, beer garden.  He killed three Americans and injured a dozen more before being put down.  When feds searched the shooter’s home, they found an Iranian flag and pictures of Iranian leaders.  There was a Quran in the killer’s vehicle.

On March 7, two Muslim men (an eighteen-year-old Turk and a nineteen-year-old Afghan) traveled from Bucks County, Pennsylvania, to the Yorkville neighborhood of Manhattan and attempted to detonate two bombs in a crowd of Americans protesting the Islamification of New York City.  Although no-one was hurt, the would-be murderers had pledged allegiance to ISIS and were trying to carry out an even deadlier attack than 2013’s Boston Marathon bombing (also an act of Islamic terrorism).  The terrorists had considered shopping malls and other targets that would allow them to maximize the number of Americans they could murder.  Islamic terrorists have used similar bombs to kill in India, France, Belgium, and the United Kingdom.  New York City’s Muslim mayor — a naturalized U.S. citizen — has spent more time criticizing the American protesters than the terrorists who attempted to murder them.

On March 12, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Sierra Leone yelled, “Allahu Akbar,” before opening fire on a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps class at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia.  The Islamic terrorist killed the ROTC instructor, Lt. Col. Brandon Shah, and critically injured two cadets before other class-members stabbed him to death.  The Islamic State ally was allegedly trying to recreate the 2009 slaughter at Fort Hood, Texas, in which another Islamic terrorist murdered fourteen Americans and injured several dozen more.  He had already been sentenced to eleven years in prison for providing material support to ISIS, was a known admirer of slain al-Qaida leader Anwar al-Awlaki, and had expressed a desire to murder Americans during the month of Ramadan.  The Biden administration released this killer from federal custody with years left on his sentence.

Also on March 12, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Lebanon attacked the Temple Israel synagogue and daycare in suburban Detroit — one of the nation’s largest Reform synagogues — with an explosives-packed car.  After ramming his car into the building, the Islamic terrorist opened fire before security guards neutralized him.  He lived in Dearborn, a suburb with the notorious reputation of being the “Jihadi capital” of the United States.

Do you think we might have a problem with naturalizing foreigners unworthy of American citizenship?  Is it possible that after decades of fighting Islamic extremists “over there,” we might have an even bigger problem with Islamic extremists already in the United States?

Whenever politicians or pundits observe that Islamic immigrants often refuse to assimilate to American culture and are often downright hostile to the United States (while living off of state and federal welfare programs), those politicians and pundits are denounced as “Islamophobic” bigots.  Apparently, if you are unwilling to look the other way while Islamic terrorists murder Americans, you are “guilty” of being insufficiently “politically correct.”  Heaven forbid that we ever have another Islamic terror attack on the same scale as 9/11.  Public school teachers’ unions will insist that we deserved it.  Jake Tapper and CNN will find a way to blame President Trump.  The Democrat Party (and Establishment Republicans) will look for new ways to bring millions of unvetted Islamic foreigners into the United States.  And NYC Mayor Mamdani will hold Islamic prayer services in Times Square.

That last prediction is hardly far-fetched.  On March 13, Muslims held a “Quds Rally” (as in pro-Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) in Times Square during which crowds held portraits of Iran’s “Supreme Leader,” waved Hezbollah flags, and chanted, “Shame, Shame, U.S.A.”  This obscenity was put together after four Islamic terror attacks inside the United States over the last two weeks.  A reasonable American might assume that openly supporting our enemies during times of war is tantamount to treason.  Imagine seeing supporters of Osama bin Laden parading down Broadway after 9/11.  Or watching German Nazis or Imperial Japanese doing the same thing in the middle of WWII.  Yet we have al-Qaida and ISIS supporters cheering for Islamic terrorists in the heart of Manhattan today, and Americans are expected to accept that this moral abomination is a sign of a healthy “democracy.”  I have seen few public figures denounce the fifth column operating with abandon inside the United States.

A common observation holds that if you want to know what problems the United States will be facing in fifteen short years, just look across the pond to see what’s going on in the United Kingdom.  I’ve always found that statement a bit depressing because it has proved remarkably accurate.  I say, “depressing,” because I have watched Britain commit civilizational seppuku all of my life.  During the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, the opening ceremony featured a troupe of dancing nurses performing some bizarre routine meant to glamorize socialized medicine.  Little did I realize at the time that American nurses would be emulating their performance less than a decade later during the great COVID panic.

Once “the empire on which the sun never sets,” the British Empire was so large that it included over a quarter of the entire planet.  It had trading posts, possessions, territories, mandates, protectorates, colonies, and dominions everywhere.  As the empire collapsed over the last century, an unusual thing occurred: The foreign peoples of all those former colonies and territories moved into the British Isles.  The United Kingdom once controlled much of the world.  Now much of the world lives inside and controls the United Kingdom.  

How has this geographical inversion worked out for the native Brits?  Let us count the myriad ways that life has changed: (1) Out of deference to its foreign “newcomers,” the British government has decided that the English, Scottish, and Union Jack flags should be considered “tools of hate.”  (2) British museums are “fighting colonialism” by covering up historic portraits of long-since-departed Brits accused of “racist” or “imperialist” sympathies.  (3) The Bank of England is similarly “fighting imperialism” by replacing Winston Churchill’s likeness on British currency with native wildlife.  (4) The British government is demanding that schools, councils, and workplaces monitor and report “anti-Muslim hostility.”  (5) Following the government’s new directives, regional councils are warning schools that children’s drawings “could be blasphemous under Islamic law.”  (6) And London buses and Underground Tube stations are being equipped with “deep wound stab kits” and “bleed kits” for unstated reasons.  

The British government is purging the United Kingdom of its flags, artwork, and history.  While it enforces Islamic law against native Brits of all ages, the government protects its Islamic conquerors from insult.  At least authorities in the U.K. have supplied city buses with “bleed kits.”  It’s incredibly compassionate of the government to work so hard to save the lives of Britain’s sons and daughters who get stabbed by Parliament’s protected class of Islamic terrorists.

How much of the insanity now disemboweling formerly Great Britain feels fifteen years away, and how much of it seems entirely too familiar?  Just as the U.K. is paying the price for inviting the world to live inside its gates, America is paying a price, too.  Four Islamic terror attacks in two weeks suggest that a civilizational war is already raging.  When “Islamophobia” is described as a “bigger threat” than Islamic terrorism, we have a pretty good idea who is winning.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/03/the_religion_of_peace_sure_likes_to_kill_and_maim.html

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.