Search This Blog

Thursday, February 26, 2026

The Graveyard Of Destructive Ideas

 by Victor Davis Hanson,

How do destructive ideas and bouts of collective madness so quickly become policy, law, and the status quo?

After all, most have little public support—and are not Western nations supposedly rationally governed?

There is usually a multi-step process on the road to these self-destructive fits of society-wide insanity.

The suicidal impulse so often begins with left-leaning researchers in elite universities (i.e., the tenured in search of a novel, grant-getting theory). They begin insisting that a new existential threat requires immediate government intervention, novel legislation, ample funding, and public awareness of the impending danger.

So out of nowhere, the public is warned that the scorching planet will be inundated by rising seas in a mere decade. Or that millions of transgender youth are our next civil rights frontier, given that they suffer in silence without political advocacy, new laws, programs, and the chance for “life-saving,” powerful hormonal treatments and radical sex-reassignment surgeries. Indeed, the travel time from an outlandish idea by the faculty lounge to liberal status quo is a mere few years.

Next, the media, hand-in-glove with academia, springs into action to persuade the skeptical public to “follow the science” and “trust the experts.” It castigates any doubters as cranks or “conspiracy theorists” who spread “disinformation” and “misinformation”; or as racists, nativists, sexists, homophobes, and transphobes who must be silenced.

Hollywood and sports celebrities often piggyback on the frenzy, hijacking awards ceremonies and pre-game national anthems to out-virtue-signal each other, warning the public that they must adapt and change—or else!

Almost overnight—to take just one example—going to an isolated beach without a mask during the COVID pandemic, showing skepticism about the efficacy or safety of experimental mRNA COVID vaccines, or daring to believe that the Wuhan gain-of-function virology lab (in part aided and abetted by grants and support from Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and the National Institutes of Health) was the source of a manufactured COVID pathogen became heresies. And the perpetrators, as always, had to be punished either legally or through social ostracism and cancel culture.

Third, liberal foundations begin funding more “research” to “prove” that partisan “experts” should not be ignored. They also fund activist groups that hit the street to gin up popular support, which often results in the required tumult and occasional violence. They embrace the theory that any disruption will so bother the public that it will support almost anything if it just makes the bedlam go away.

New victims and their oppressors are created ex nihilo.

Yesterday’s radical new policy becomes today’s wishy-washy cop-out, as tomorrow’s once-unthinkable radical idea becomes commonplace and institutionalized. So it was that a few years ago, the public was told of a new and huge victimized group in the shadows, suffering from “gender dysphoria”—an age-old malady known to the ancients and, according to modern researchers before the millennium, affecting about one in 10,000–30,000 people.

No matter—almost overnight, transgenderism joined the gay and lesbian community to become the new LGB—T oppressed. Drag shows, once confined to enclaves in San Francisco or New York, were suddenly mainstreamed into military bases, children’s libraries, and cruise ships. Thirty percent of students on some campuses polled said that they might consider “transitioning.”

Abruptly, professors and students began reading emails appearing from their finger-in-the-wind administrators with strange new runes under their titles and names, identifying their “preferred pronouns”—sometimes the standard “she/her/hers” or “he/him/his,” and sometimes the unfathomable, such as “Ze/hir/hirs” or the plural “they/them.”

Groupthink and mob mentality prevail. Soon, not listing pronouns on correspondence indicts someone as a counterrevolutionary, a transphobe, or, worst of all, a Trump sympathizer.

Fourth, fence-sitting liberal and socialist officials and candidates equate the well-funded activism, the performance-art street demonstrations, and the media fixations on victims and victimizers with growing grassroots support for yet another cause.

This is well illustrated by how initially liberal officials—stunned that 70 percent of the public wanted secure borders, no more illegal immigration, and deportation of the 10 million Biden-era illegal aliens—kept quiet about Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration.

However, after massive and violent demonstrations in major blue cities—with the deaths of two protestors who confronted ICE officers and tried to impede their efforts to detain illegal aliens—biased media blared out that officers were manhandling “mere bystanders.” ICE is now routinely likened by Democratic politicians to the Nazi Gestapo, well beyond the usual boilerplate smears as “pigs” and “fascists.”

The public buys into the fable that ICE agents were not arresting some 4,000 criminal illegal aliens in Minnesota while elected officials were siccing protestors on them, but were instead “murdering” innocent unarmed bystanders, who were harmlessly protesting ICE’s “goon” tactics.

Fifth, once the delusion—whether it is of a doomed sizzling planet, a utopian open border, the systemic oppression of a huge transgendered victimized class, or the habitual and flagrant shooting of innocent unarmed black males by predatory racist police—is institutionalized, then the government and institutions, public and private, ignore public opinion. And they begin passing laws and protocols once deemed unthinkable.

The once-meritocratic SAT, originally aimed at nullifying the old-boy admissions network at the Ivy League, becomes “racist” and is dropped. “Defund the Police” becomes the elite white activist mantra.

Soon, the politicians’ talking points become gospel, as formerly crackpot “critical legal theory” and “critical race theory” are used to “prove” that police hunt down minorities rather than the criminals among them.

Productive, safe nuclear clean-energy plants are shut down. Billions of dollars are invested—and lost—by government mandates aimed at phasing out internal combustion engines and subsidizing unpopular electric vehicles. Government-built high-speed rail boondoggles waste billions before laying a foot of track.

Schools and public offices must suddenly install “gender neutral” bathrooms. What follows is the surreal sight of biological men competing in women’s sports and undressing with teen girls in locker rooms—acts that just a few years prior would have landed someone in jail.

However, there sometimes occurs a sixth stage, which we might call the “Emperor Has No Clothes” wake-up call, that occasionally stops the lemmings in their mad dash over the cliff.

Gradually, the public wonders why it pays twice as much for electricity as it did a mere few years earlier. Supposedly doomed polar bears appear to be thriving in the Arctic. John Kerry is routinely spotted on a carbon-spewing private jet to get to climate change conferences abroad. California’s “permanent” drought strangely ignores near-record wet years and snowfall. Too little rain proves global warming; too much is proof of “climate chaos.”

Barack Obama, the Cassandra of rising seas, nonetheless prefers to buy and live in multimillion-dollar mansions on the Hawaii beach and Martha’s Vineyard seaside.

A few brave reporters cite China building two coal plants a month, even as it brags about the Paris Climate Accords and urges the West to embrace “clean energy.”

The public begins to wonder why, after mass shootings, authorities mysteriously conceal the transgender status of the shooter or suppress the perpetrator’s incriminating target list and diary.

Quietly, university studies start citing the cardiac, pulmonary, and hematological side effects of the mRNA vaccines.

Some universities, without much fanfare, begin to reintroduce the SAT after remedial math courses have had to expand to accommodate nearly half the entering class.

Economists at last come out of the shadows to cite data that shows the massive COVID lockdowns were a catastrophic blunder that permanently stunted the education of millions of youths and birthed an epidemic of psycho-social maladies that disrupted entire communities.

Accusations grow that the architects of Black Lives Matter embezzled millions of dollars in donations and spent freely on upscale homes for themselves. Data drips out that police shoot no more unarmed black suspects than white, when compared to the relative rates of arrests by race. The Somali community—the supposed DEI face of the new Minnesota Democratic majority—is found to be at the heart of a $9 billion fraud epidemic. And so it is revealed as most ungracious, treating its hosts’ magnanimity as naivete to be exploited rather than as generosity to be appreciated.

On the border, the old mantra that the crime rate of illegal aliens is well below that of citizens is revealed as politically tainted. Estimates emerge that 500,000 criminals or more swarmed the border, as the body count of U.S. citizens murdered and assaulted by illegal aliens grows daily.

In sum, just five years ago, when Joe Biden and his masters took control of the government, the orthodoxy was that we were to restructure the entire economy along failed European lines in order to save the planet.

There were no longer to be the two age-old sexes, but a dozen or more in 2021 America.

“Men” could become pregnant (but only if they were born as biological women).

Tampons were politically correct in male bathrooms.

Preferred pronouns dotted memos.

A swarm of 10,000 illegal aliens a day proved America was compassionate and caring while creating a “new Democratic majority,” given that “demography is destiny.”

Blue-city prosecutors released thousands of criminals either without formally charging them or after merely fining them for lesser crimes.

Racial obsessions destroyed merit-based hiring of everyone from air traffic controllers to pilots to professors to museum docents.

And then abruptly in 2025, these destructive manias began shriveling up and were destined for the graveyard of forgotten collective lunacies.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/graveyard-destructive-ideas

Wave Life Sciences: GSK selected fourth collaboration program with up to $2.8B milestones

 

Wave Life Sciences posts Q4 2025 results and says GSK selected fourth collaboration program with up to $2.8B milestones, royalties

  • On Q4 2025 call, Wave said partner GSK selected fourth collaboration program, enabling up to $2.8B milestones and royalties.
  • Growth Drivers: 007 obesity program, 006 AATD RNA editing, and expanding multi-program GSK collaboration.
  • Investor Takeaway: Story is now pipeline-driven, especially WVE-007 obesity and WVE-006 AATD.
  • Investor Takeaway: Biggest positive – human 007 data shows GLP‑1–like fat loss with muscle preservation.
  • Key Metrics/Tone: 007 showed 4% total and 9.2% visceral fat reduction; management tone confident.

Organogenesis guides 2026 net revenue down 25%–38% on Medicare reimbursement changes

Organogenesis Holdings posts record Q4 2025 revenue but guides 2026 net revenue down 25%–38% on Medicare reimbursement changes

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=ORGO&p=d

Personalis 2026 guidance for $78–80M revenue and 15–20% gross margin

 

Personalis reports Q4 and full-year 2025 results and issues 2026 guidance for $78–80M revenue and 15–20% gross margin

  • Highlighted new Medicare coverage for breast and lung cancer MRD tests during the Q4 and full-year 2025 results.
  • Reported a year-end 2025 cash balance of approximately $240M, indicating cash resources at that time.
  • 2026 outlook also includes an expected net loss of approximately $105M, with revenue of $78–80M and 15–20% gross margin.

Maravai returns to ex‑COVID growth

 

Maravai returns to ex‑COVID growth with positive Q4 2025 EBITDA, guides 2026 revenue $200–$210M and EBITDA $18–$20M

  • Ex‑COVID, Q4 revenue grew 18% and adjusted EBITDA turned positive ahead of plan.
  • Maravai beat Q4 2025 EPS and revenue estimates with non-GAAP EPS $-0.04, +33% YoY, on revenue $49.9M, -12% YoY.
  • Full-year 2025 revenue was $185.7M, modestly above guidance by about $0.7M.
  • TriLink base Q4 revenue rose 25% ex‑COVID; full-year base revenue fell 8%.

Pacira Q4 revenue $196.9M, non-GAAP EPS $0.57, issues 2026 EXPAREL and revenue guidance

 


  • Full-year 2025 revenue totaled $726.4 million
  • 2026 EXPAREL sales guidance set at $600–$620 million
  • 2026 total revenue guidance set at $745–$770 million

'Burger King rolls out AI headsets that track employee 'friendliness''



Burger King is testing artificial intelligence-powered employee headsets that monitor staff interactions with customers and oversee store operations.


The AI system, called BK Assistant, compiles "friendliness scores" at the fast-food chain's locations based on employees' conversations, according to a promotional video the company shared with the BBC.


The chain is currently piloting the system at 500 US restaurants, a spokesperson for Burger King said.


An AI chat-bot dubbed "Patty", embedded in the headsets, answers questions from employees about how to prepare menu items and flags when a product needs restocking. But its ability to monitor restaurant staff tees up a debate about surveillance.

Burger King's chief digital officer told online publication The Verge that the fast-food outlet had trained the OpenAI-powered system to identify terms including "please" and "thank you" in order to evaluate staff friendliness.


The system analyses audio from drive-thru interactions.


All US Burger King restaurants are poised to have access to the BK Assistant AI platform by the end of 2026, a company spokesperson told the BBC.


The tool is "designed to streamline restaurant operations" to let managers and staff "focus more on guest service and team leadership", Restaurant Brands International, the chain's parents company, said in a statement on Thursday.


One promotional video for the new AI assistant features the "Patty" chat-bot notifying an employee that a machine is running low on Diet Coke. Another worker asks "Patty" for a recipe reminder.


But the video also highlights an element of the tool that has started to generate backlash online: its ability to closely monitor employee behaviour.


"The team's friendliness scores this morning were the highest this week," the chat-bot tells a staff member through her headset.


Customer service calls have routinely been recorded and monitored for years. Employees are often aware that they can be assessed to ensure they're using the correct language.


But this latest step by Burger King elicited swift condemnation among some social media users who described it as "dystopian". Others questioned how accurate the chat-bot headsets will be, given that AI tools have proven to be prone to errors.


Other fast-food chains have also started to explore the use of AI in its stores. Yum Brands, whose chains include Taco Bell and Pizza Hut, last year announced a partnership with the chip giant Nvidia to develop AI tools for its restaurants.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgk2zygg0k3o