Search This Blog

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Mamdani’s $30M, NYC-run grocery store to compete with nearby markets ALREADY affordable

 Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s plan for a city-owned grocery market in East Harlem’s La Marqueta has a deeper problem than the absurdity of spending $30 million to launch a mere 9,000-square-foot store that won’t open until 2029.

His claim that the neighborhood lacks cheaper food than the citywide average — the whole basis for dipping into tax revenue at everyone else’s expense — is 100% baloney.

If he took time off from grinning at gullible journalists, he’d find the blocks around the  planned grocery site under the MetroNorth Park Avenue trestle at East 116th Street are already chock-full of bodegas and larger stores where prices for basics such as eggs, milk and soda are not only lower than at  Gristedes, Morton Williams and Trader Joe’s – they’re far below.

Mamdani, who declined to say how much a cucumber at his brainstorm might cost, claimed at a press conference, “When New Yorkers come to city-run grocery stores, they will see a clear price differential” for staples such as bread and eggs.

But the “clear price differential” already exists in the proposed market’s front- and backyards.

Despite woke claims that merchants gouge lower-income residents, prices at the spacious, 24-hour, well-stocked City Fresh Market at 125 E. 116th St. — a half-block from Mamdani’s site,  one of 15 in the chain in the city and New Jersey — were comfortably below what we found in more prosperous neighborhoods.

Milk cost $1.99 a quart, compared with $2.29 at Gristedes. A 48-oz. jug of Trop Lite orange beverage was $5.29, compared with $5.49 at Morton Williams and $7.99  at Gristedes.

City Fresh Market sells 2-liter bottles of Coca-Cola, Sprite and other popular brands at two bottles for $6; they were more than $4 each at just about every other supermarket we checked.

And those eggs Mamdani mentioned? Grade-A Sunshine Farms medium eggs were available for just $5 for two dozen at City Fresh Market, versus nearly as much for a single dozen elsewhere.

Prices at the spacious, 24-hour, well-stocked City Fresh Market at 125 E. 116th St. — a half-block from Mamdani’s site,  — were comfortably below what we found in more prosperous neighborhoods.Luiz C. Ribeiro for NY Post

Like other nearby merchants, City Fresh Market manager Manuel Betamcef feared the impact of the city grocery store on his establishment’s profitability. He said the plan was “very very, bad, not fair. It’s definitely going to affect us. We can’t go lower [to compete with it] because we have to pay rent and taxes.”

The question, though, might not be whether established stores can compete with Mamdani’s folly  — but whether the city can compete with them.

For example, prices at Meat Market at 87 E. 116th St. between Park and Madison avenues were remarkably reasonable, even for East Harlem. The neighborhood’s median household income of $46,950 in 2023 was around 41% less than the citywide median, according to the NYU Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy.

Prices at Meat Market at 87 E. 116th St. between Park and Madison avenues were remarkably reasonable, even for East Harlem.Steve Cuozzo/NY Post

Meat Market offers 17 variety “plans” starting at a mere $41.99 for 10 pounds of meat — two pounds each of chicken cutlets, chicken legs, beef ribs, chuck steak and ground beef. Like all of the butcher shop’s meat plans, it came with a bonus — in this case, a bottle of soda.

Plan No. 6 includes 20 pounds of beef, chicken and pork for all of $73 — and comes with a bonus of a dozen eggs.

Yet, the “democratic socialist” mayor’s echo chamber includes  Manhattan Borough President Brad Hoylman-Sigal, who harrumphed, “In East Harlem, we see the health consequences of limited access every day — from higher rates of diabetes to heart disease — and the selection of La Marqueta builds on its historic role as a vital neighborhood food hub.”

The once-thriving La Marqueta turned into a flop over the past few decades when better food products became more widely available.Luiz C. Ribeiro for NY Post
Vacant site next to La Marqueta where the city-owned grocery market will be built.Steve Cuozzo/NY Post

He didn’t mention that the once-thriving La Marqueta turned into a flop over the past few decades when better food products became more widely available.

Local resident Destiny Louissant told Gothamist she didn’t see the point of a city-run food market when “there’s literally one up the block, there’s a lot in the area.”

And food economist Stephen Zagor, an adjunct associate professor at Columbia Business School, told The Post that while Mamdani’s plan was “a noble idea to help solve food insecurity, it seems to have more holes than a slice of subsidized Swiss cheese.”

He added, “The fact that Mandani’s team chose a first location within an apple throw of numerous existing neighborly-priced supermarkets makes me even more concerned that we may be seeing the birth of a food Titanic — costly to open and operationally unsound.”

https://nypost.com/2026/04/23/business/zohrna-mamdanis-nyc-run-grocery-store-would-compete-with-harlem-supermarkets-that-are-already-affordable/

Iran brings out retired VLCC for storage pressure at Kharg Island - tracker

 

Iran brought a previously retired very large crude carrier (VLCC) back into service as it prepares for possible limits in oil storage capacity at Kharg Island, TankerTrackers said in a post on X on Thursday.


https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202604194357 

DOJ Settles Surveillance Abuse Lawsuit With Former Trump Campaign Adviser Carter Page

 by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times,

The Department of Justice told the U.S. Supreme Court on April 22 that it has settled a lawsuit filed by former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page over alleged surveillance abuses.

Page had served as a foreign policy adviser to President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.

He sued several top federal law enforcement officials, alleging his constitutional rights were violated through illegal surveillance carried out under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act as part of an investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The settlement moots, or makes legally irrelevant, Page’s lawsuit against the federal government, U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer said in a new brief filed with the nation’s highest court.

Page had filed a petition with the Supreme Court in December 2025 to appeal a U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling that affirmed dismissal of the lawsuit by a lower court.

The appeals court ruled that he had waited too long to initiate his lawsuit.

Page is a longtime contributor to the United States’ national security efforts as an “operational contact” of the Central Intelligence Agency. Despite his years of service, he was a target in the FBI’s investigation known as Operation Crossfire Hurricane that probed suspected Russian influence on Trump’s 2016 campaign. He has denied having any improper ties to Russia and was not charged with wrongdoing, according to the petition.

“Through deliberate lies and incomplete factual assertions, the FBI convinced the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) that there was probable cause to believe that Dr. Page was an intermediary between Russia and Paul Manafort, the Trump campaign’s chair,” he said in the petition.

The FBI filed for four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to surveil Page and the court granted all four. Before the final renewal application was filed, two members of the operation conspired to leak information from the secret FBI surveillance of Page to the media to damage his public image and the Trump campaign. Anonymously sourced media reports falsely insinuated that Page was an agent of Russia, according to the petition.

Because Page knew he wasn’t a Russian agent, he inferred from the media reports that he had been unlawfully surveilled and shared his belief with Congress and the public, according to his petition. However, foreign intelligence investigations are carried out in secret, so his suspicions could not be verified no matter what steps he took.

In late 2019, the Office of the Inspector General published a report spelling out “the FBI’s repeated and thorough surveillance abuses against Dr. Page,” stating that the first warrant application contained “seven significant inaccuracies and omissions.” The FBI also excluded information exonerating Page from warrant applications, including statements by Page “that were inconsistent with its theory” that “Page was an agent of Russia.” The office also “identified 10 additional significant errors in the renewal applications,” the petition said.

A Justice Department spokesperson commented on the settlement.

“No American should ever face covert and unlawful surveillance based on their political views,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times.

“The investigation into Carter Page—a man never charged with a single crime—relied on inherently flawed and uncorroborated information, proving it was a political sham from the get-go. The targeting of American citizens for political purposes constitutes a severe violation of civil liberties,” the spokesperson continued.

“This Department of Justice is committed to dismantling the weaponization of government and today’s settlement represents one of many initiatives to provide justice to those abused by rogue actors.”

The Epoch Times reached out for comment to Page’s attorney, Gene Schaerr of Schaerr Jaffe in Washington. No reply was received by publication time.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/doj-settles-surveillance-abuse-lawsuit-former-trump-campaign-adviser-carter-page

Iran football team can come but cannot ‘pretend terrorists are journalists’, Rubio says

 US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday Iran is not barred from entering the United States for the FIFA World Cup, but added that individuals linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) cannot “pretend they’re journalists and athletic trainers” in order to gain entry.


https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202604194357

Power vacuum in Tehran emboldens hardliners

 As debate over a ceasefire and renewed talks with the United States intensifies, the absence of a clear supreme arbiter in Tehran appears to be giving Iran’s hardliners more room to shape the narrative and to hinder any eventual agreement.

Under former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, ultraconservative factions were often allowed to rage in public, attack moderates and mobilize supporters in the streets. But when necessary, he could impose discipline.

Even on the 2015 nuclear deal, which he later criticized publicly, the system moved quickly once it was understood he had given at least tacit approval.

Then-speaker Ali Larijani famously pushed the JCPOA through parliament in a matter of minutes, effectively silencing opposition by invoking the Supreme Leader’s authority.

Today, who truly leads Iran—whether one man or a shifting collective—is anyone’s guess. What is clearer is that the political vacuum appears to be rewarding the loudest and most uncompromising voices.

Iranian hardliners’ arguments for continuing the war with the United States have come to dominate state television, media reports and billboards across major squares in Tehran.

Many frame negotiations as a betrayal of “red lines,” accusing “accomplices of America and Israel,” “liberals” and those intimidated by Washington of undermining the country.

Those so-called red lines are often justified through selective interpretations of new leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s April 9 message, former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s past speeches rejecting negotiations and claims by individual hardliners citing unnamed “reliable sources.”

One prominent example is ultraconservative MP Amir Hossein Sabeti of the Paydari Party, who has repeatedly warned that negotiators may be crossing the Supreme Leader’s red lines.

In a post on X, he claimed to have “the most definite information” that negotiating with the United States on the nuclear issue was prohibited and demanded that Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi publicly deny reports of talks on suspending enrichment or diluting uranium.

He implied consequences if they did not.

State television has amplified such voices while giving nightly exposure to rallies calling for the war to continue until “final victory.”

The constant need to fill airtime has also elevated more extreme or theatrical voices, including members of the public eager for their moment on air.

Meanwhile, moderate voices arguing for negotiations appear to have lost even the limited channels they once had to plead their case to the country’s highest authority.

Iranian academic Sadeq Zibakalam, speaking to the reform-leaning Fararu website, questioned why some factions remain so insistent on continuing the war despite the economic devastation already inflicted.

“Do these gentlemen know what forty days of war has done to our economy, how many production units have run into trouble, and how many have laid off their workers?” he asked.

He said it was striking that hardline revolutionaries inside Iran, opposition groups seeking regime change and Israeli officials all appeared to share an interest in prolonging the conflict.

Views such as Zibakalam’s were once represented within inner circles of power by figures like former president Hassan Rouhani, who had direct access to Ali Khamenei, even if he rarely got his way.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has no such standing as the veteran Rouhani. And whatever limited influence he might have enjoyed under Khamenei Sr. appears to have diminished further under Khamenei Jr., who—even if in good health—remains almost certainly beyond the reach of civilian leaders.

In the absence of a clear authority to impose discipline or bless compromise, political competition in Tehran increasingly appears to favor the fiercest factions.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202604234667

DOJ reclassifies marijuana products: What it means for healthcare

 The Justice Department and Drug Enforcement Administration have placed FDA-approved products containing marijuana and state-licensed medical marijuana products in Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act. 

The order takes effect immediately and also initiates an expedited administrative hearing process to evaluate broader rescheduling of marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III, indicating accepted medical use. A hearing is set for June 29, according to an April 23 news release from the Justice Department. 

Marijuana was previously classified as a Schedule I substance, a category reserved for drugs such as heroin, ecstasy and LSD. In August 2023, HHS recommended the DEA reclassify the drug to Schedule III after determining it poses less risk than other Schedule I substances. The FDA reinforced that position in January 2024, citing preclinical, clinical and epidemiologic data. 

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche authorized the action under his authority to reschedule drugs, citing the need to align with state medical marijuana programs while maintaining federal controls. The rescheduling allows for research on the safety and efficacy of the substance, he said in the release.

The DEA is also withdrawing a prior notice of hearing published Aug. 29, 2024, tied to a proposed rulemaking first issued May 21, 2024, to accelerate the administrative process. The agency said the updated process will include firm deadlines to support a more timely resolution. 

The move follows President Donald Trump’s executive order in December directing the attorney general to start the rulemaking process to reschedule marijuana to Schedule III. Mr. Trump also recently signed an order to boost research on psychedelics, including ibogaine and psilocybin

Twenty-four states, two U.S. territories and the District of Columbia have legalized small amounts of marijuana for adult recreational use.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/behavioral-health-government-policies/justice-department-reclassifies-marijuana-products-what-it-means-for-healthcare/

GPS darts can now track fleeing cars in NY: Police

 A new technology currently being piloted allows officers to track high-risk pursuits.

The StarChase system, now implemented by the Suffolk County’s DWI enforcement team, works by launching a GPS‑activated dart onto a fleeing vehicle, allowing officers to monitor its real‑time location, speed and direction, according to officials.

The Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office is the first law enforcement agency in the county to pilot the technology.

The system was implemented March 24 and first used during a DWI arrest in East Patchogue on April 1, when a suspect refused to yield. The driver was later charged with aggravated DWI, according to Suffolk County police.

Officials said the dart is secured with strong adhesive, making it unlikely a suspect could remove it.

The technology costs about $9,000 per vehicle, including equipment and installation, and was funded through the agency’s operating budget, according to police.

“We have seen dozens of people try to evade arrest, causing dangerous situations for themselves, our officers and the community at large,” Suffolk County Sheriff Errol D. Toulon Jr. said in a statement. “With our DWI team equipped with the StarChase GPS technology, it will help them apprehend subjects during high‑risk events by safely giving our officers access to their real‑time location, speed and direction.”

The technology has proven over 85% effectiveness in cases involving fleeing vehicles, stolen cars, DUIs, human trafficking, narcotics trafficking and other offenses, according to Suffolk County police.

https://pix11.com/news/gps-darts-can-now-track-fleeing-cars-in-ny-police/