Search This Blog

Monday, June 8, 2026

Can AI Save More Energy Than It Consumes?

  by Haley Zaremba via Oilprice.com,

  • Big law firm Duane Morris argues the energy sector's greatest AI-related risk is not surging power demand but failing to adopt AI tools fast enough to remain competitive.

  • MIT research challenges industry claims that AI efficiency gains will offset its enormous energy consumption, while new data centers continue to be approved at record pace.

  • AI shows genuine promise in clean energy applications - from nuclear fusion modeling to EV battery recovery - but the AI investment boom is simultaneously diverting capital away from next-gen energy research.

The artificial intelligence boom has created unprecedented pressure and anxiety in the energy industry. The public and private sector alike are expending enormous amounts of effort trying to quantify the amount of electricity that will be needed to power data centers in the near future, and get ahead of the skyrocketing energy demands headed for our already outdated and beleaguered electric grids. But the answer to the energy monster that AI is unleashing could very well lie in the application of AI tools.

A new article published by Biglaw firm Duane Morris argues that the most prescient AI-related risk for the energy industry is not the one posed by the demands of the sector itself, but the risk of falling behind in AI integration and application. The firm argues that the energy sector has an obligation to consider the ways in which large language models can be an asset, concluding that "AI should not be viewed only through the lens of risk avoidance."

"The risks of AI remain real and must be governed thoughtfully," the Energy Intelligence article goes on to say. "But in a sector responsible for critical infrastructure, the greater long-term risk may not be using AI too aggressively - it may be failing to use it enough."

Indeed, proponents of AI adoption argue that although training and operating large language models eats up an enormous amount of energy, not to mention other finite resources such as water, AI will be instrumental in making a wide array of industries significantly more energy-efficient. In fact, through these widespread efficiencies, some experts say that AI has the potential to save more energy than it consumes overall.

However, critics say that these claims are overblown and the result of wishful thinking rather than rigorous modelling. A 2025 report from MIT challenges such claims, pointing out that touted efficiency gains have not yet come to fruition, and may not be forthcoming. And while numbers on AI's efficiency gains - and even the amount of energy that AI is currently using - are still lacking, new data centers are being greenlit at lightning speed.

"AI's integration into almost everything from customer service calls to algorithmic 'bosses' to warfare is fueling enormous demand," the Washington Post wrote in an article published last summer. "Despite dramatic efficiency improvements, pouring those gains back into bigger, hungrier models powered by fossil fuels will create the energy monster we imagine."

Moreover, it is just this fear of "being left behind" that's fuelling the AI boom, arguably even more than actual demand. There is question as to whether rapid AI integration into everything from our energy grids to our electric toothbrushes - no, really - is going to create a more sophisticated and energy-efficient world, or whether it's just a resource-intensive bid to stay relevant in a rapidly changing global economy.

Wherever you stand on the issue of AI integration, it's increasingly clear that AI has some extremely promising applications in next-gen clean energy technologies. Researchers are using large language models to conduct "needle in a haystack" type inquiries to find the best methods and materials to advance nuclear fusion modelling, for example. In the renewable energy sector, AI is being used to improve forecasting of energy supply and demand for greater grid stability. And AI could even soon be used to give new life to dead EV batteries.

The massive energy needs of AI are also pushing increasing and intensified research efforts into cutting edge clean energy technologies such as nuclear fusion, advanced geothermal, and space-based solar power. But Big Tech is running on natural gas while it powers research into these clean energy ambitions. And, overall, research into next-gen energy is suffering from the AI gold rush as investors redirect their attention.

AI's role in the energy sector is anything but simple. And it's true that avoiding AI integration entirely won't solve the problem. But if the energy sector is going to eschew risk aversion and lean into the AI boom as Duane Morris suggests, it needs to have a strong policy foundation and a much smarter AI strategy going forward.

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/can-ai-save-more-energy-it-consumes


Houthis Declare "Total Ban" On Israeli Ships As Dual Chokepoint Crisis Stokes Supply Chain Nightmare

 Brent crude futures jumped as much as 5% to $97.83 a barrel, while WTI traded around $95 a barrel, as renewed Iran-Israel fighting threatened to unravel a fragile US-Iran ceasefire and further disrupt energy flows.

On the maritime chokepoint front, Iran-backed Houthis declared a full ban on Israeli vessels in the southern Red Sea, warning that any Israeli ship (or linked ship) will be seen as a military target.

"First: We declare a complete and total ban on maritime navigation for the Israeli enemy in the Red Sea, and we consider all enemy movements to be military targets for our Armed Forces from the moment this statement is issued," the terror group said Monday in a statement.

The statement continued, "Second: We affirm that we will meet escalation with escalation, and that our military operations will escalate in line with events, the battle, and in conjunction with the axis of Jihad and Resistance."

"Third: We affirm the right of our people and the peoples of our free nation to confront American-Israeli aggression, and that we will not stand idly by in the face of the unjust siege imposed on our people and the peoples of the axis of Jihad and Resistance in Palestine, Gaza, Iran, Lebanon, and Iraq. All enemy attempts will fail, God willing, and our operations will continue as long as the aggression and siege against us and the axis of Jihad and Resistance continue," the statement concluded.

The announcement is similar to the Houthis' late-2023 campaign, when rebel forces attacked ships linked to Israel or bound for Israeli ports in or around the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait. They framed the attacks as retaliation for the Gaza war.

Potential disruption of the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait in the southern Red Sea will only add to the headaches for global maritime trade, as it is a critical sea route for Asia-to-Europe commerce and Gulf energy exports.

At its narrowest point, the strait is about 18 miles wide, making commercial vessels extraordinarily vulnerable to suicide drones, missiles, mines, and small boats.

The previous disruption of the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait led to ships rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope, adding time, fuel, insurance costs, and higher shipping costs. The IMF has previously said that the Red Sea attacks halved Suez Canal trade in early 2024, while shipping traffic via the Cape of Good Hope surged.

Related:

Readers were brefied in mid-April on the threat other critical straits could be disrupted. Read the note here

The big risk here is a simultaneous disruption of both maritime chokepoints. Bab-el-Mandeb would hit the world's trade artery, while Hormuz has already disrupted the world's energy artery. Combined, the clogging of both maritime chokepoints would be viewed as a major escalation, likely raising the risk of additional supply chain stress, higher freight and insurance costs, and another inflationary wave.

https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/houthis-declare-total-ban-israeli-ships-dual-chokepoint-crisis-stokes-supply-chain

Iranian Crude Offered to China at Discount as Demand Softens

 


Iranian crude has been slashed for Chinese buyers in an effort to entice interest from independent oil refiners, which have reduced operating rates to stem losses from weaker margins.

Prices for Iranian Light for July arrival were offered at a discount of more than $1 a barrel to ICE Brent benchmarks, compared with a premium last month, said traders who participate in the market. Russian crude that is shipped from the country’s far east has also been lowered, they added.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-08/iranian-crude-offered-to-china-at-discount-as-demand-softens

California's tax policies are so bad billionaires are willing to pay extra to flee

 by Monica Showalter

California is well known for driving its productive citizens to other states.

A proposed new 'billionaire tax,' that's coming up on the November ballot has already driven many of its most successful citizens -- Peter Thiel, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, Stephen Spielberg -- to other states like Florida, Tennessee, Texas, Nevada, any place where the greedy hand of the state is not fixing to take another dip into their pockets. 

The Wall Street Journal last week noticed something weird: A lot of them are moving to nearby Nevada ... and they're seemingly losing money by buying up properties around Lake Tahoe at inflated prices.

According to the Journal:

As wealthy Californians flee the state, deep-pocketed buyers are taking refuge in Nevada, which is starting to rival Florida as a tax haven for the elite. Amid surging demand for prime Tahoe property in Nevada, a recent string of megadeals reflects the premium buyers are willing to pay for a lower tax bill—and the widening price gap between the two sides of the lake.

California’s proposed wealth tax effectively “sprinkled rocket fuel” on the ultraluxury market on the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe, said Bill Dietz of Tahoe Luxury Properties.

The proposal would levy a one-time, 5% tax on the net worth of residents with net assets of $1 billion or more, and would apply to anyone who resided in California as of Jan. 1, 2026. 

In December 2025, just after the tax was proposed, Google co-founder Sergey Brin paid $42 million for a lakefront home in Crystal Bay, Nev., property records show. The same month, a 210-acre estate in Zephyr Cove, Nev., sold for $80 million to an undisclosed buyer. Then in March, an entity tied to venture capitalist Steve Jurvetson shattered the Nevada and Tahoe records with the $125 million purchase of an estate in Incline Village, Nev. Jurvetson also picked up an adjacent $7 million property, and paid $46 million for a separate Incline Village home, for a total spend of $178 million. Brin didn’t respond to requests for comment. Jurveston declined to comment.

 

Then came the kicker from the Journal:

Ironically, the wealthiest Nevada home buyers may be saving money on their taxes, but they could be paying at least twice as much for real estate. In the Tahoe area, Nevada homes typically carry a roughly 20% premium over similar California properties, Dietz said, and the delta is far wider for the priciest homes. “A $20 million property on the California side will be $40 million to $50 million on the Nevada side, that’s how dramatic the spread is,” he said.

 

I used to cover billionaires for the Forbes list, and learned that all billionaires pay attention to their fortunes, don't like to lose money, and always calculate the ratios and odds in various deals and scenarios. There's no question the billionaires knew they'd be paying more for Nevada-side Tahoe property.

 Obviously, they've judged that a better deal than staying in California, where the odds of California's ruling Democrats leaving billionaires alone after taking 'their' five percent were pretty unlikely. Wealth isn't just a matter of money sitting in a pile, it's a matter of intentions and investments, what is invested to provide returns in the future. That seems to be what's operational here, not merely the cash in the checkbook as California's lawmakers seem to 'think.'

Democrats go to the tax-the-billionaire well again and again as they mouth claptrap about 'affordability' and they certainly have no intention at stopping with billionaires. Anyone who owns a home, no matter how humble, is a millionaire, after all, with Democrat policies that create inflated property values and yes, they will be coming for people with those homes as greedy millionaires. Meanwhile, the billionaires won't stand a chance in the face of that kind of greed from government that will continue so long as Democrats hold power. Who wants to wait around to be the next harvest.

By contrast, the Tahoe property looks cheap. What's more, unlike taxes, property an investment they get to keep -- they can sell it, rent it, make money off it if they like, or just kick back and enjoy it.

So yes, they got a good deal by paying those premiums, even if some quoted by the Journal think they are losing money. Sometimes it's worth it to lose money for peace of mind -- the certainty that California's lawmakers won't take a thwack at their piñata is clearly worth paying a premium for.

And the fact that this is happening tells a lot about just how bad California's governance is, which, augmented by election fraud, is probably impossible to change for the foreseeable future.

So adios, idiots, the billionaires have better places to go and they're happy to pay a premium to do it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/06/california_s_tax_policies_are_so_bad_billionaires_are_willing_to_pay_extra_to_flee.html

Sunday, June 7, 2026

Nvidia CEO says company is working with LG on humanoid robots and data centers



Nvidia CEO Jensen ‌Huang said on ‌Monday that it is partnering ​with South Korea's tech conglomerate LG Group on humanoid robots and ‌data ⁠centers.

"We are working with them in ⁠motor technology as well as mechanical systems ​so that ​we ​can bring ‌together humanoid robotics and the future of robotics," he told reporters after a meeting with ‌LG Group ​Chairman Koo ​Kwang-mo ​in Seoul


"We're also ‌working with LG ​in ​architecting the future data centers," he said.

https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/nvidia-ceo-says-company-working-023727300.html

'China says 'illegal' outbound investment crackdown won't lead to forced liquidation'



China's crackdown on "illegal" cross-border investment won't lead to mainlanders' offshore accounts being closed and assets liquidated forcibly, the securities regulator said, amid investor concerns over the ‌fate of $54 billion worth of assets.

Some savers from mainland China are travelling to Hong ‌Kong and scrambling to explore options to retain their investments in the financial hub, after Beijing's unexpected crackdown last month on "illegal" ​cross-border securities trading.

The clamp-down and the sanctioning of overseas brokers for "illegally" helping Chinese investors buy shares in foreign markets does not affect their business activities offshore, said the watchdog in response to Reuters queries.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) statement is the clearest indication yet that overseas brokerages can continue to offer legitimate offshore ‌services to mainland clients.

The latest statement ⁠comes amid growing confusion among Chinese investors over how to deal with their money and investments in offshore brokerage accounts - worth about $54 billion according to Chinese ⁠broker Kaiyuan Securities.

Fears of forced liquidation triggered a sell-off in U.S.-listed Chinese stocks immediately after the crackdown was announced on May 22.

"Safety of investors' assets will not be affected by the rectification campaign," the CSRC said ​in the ​statement. "Existing accounts will not be forcibly closed, and assets ​held in those accounts will not be ‌subject to mandatory cleanup."


Onshore Chinese investors can sell assets and move money out of the affected accounts, while brokers' provision of illicit services on the mainland, including via websites and trading software, will be terminated in two years, the CSRC said.

Tiger, Futu, Longbridge have told their onshore Chinese clients that starting mid-June, they can no longer open new accounts, add positions, or move in fresh money, but offshore ‌services will remain intact.

The CSRC said that its policy ​intention is clear - the crackdown was aimed at "purifying" China's capital ​markets, protecting investors, and "hitting" illegal capital outflows ​from the country.

"No country, or region would tolerate overseas institutions conducting illegal activities ‌within its border," it said, and it must ​be dealt with ruthlessly ​as they "seriously disrupt market order, increase financial risks, and harm investors."

Responding to Reuters' question on whether the tightening of capital controls also seeks to nudge money into domestic capital markets, the ​securities watchdog said that Chinese assets ‌were "appealing", but did not elaborate.

"We welcome both domestic and international investors to participate in ​China's capital markets and share the dividends of the country's high-quality economic growth."

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/policy/articles/china-says-illegal-outbound-investment-232751667.html

Israel struck targets without entering Iranian airspace - Israeli media

 

Israeli media reported that the country's air force carried out strikes against Iranian government targets without entering Iranian airspace.

The reports said the attacks were launched from outside Iran's borders, though no further operational details were immediately provided.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/liveblog/202606062776