Left-wing medical associations have banded together to block an upcoming federal meeting in an attempt to table vaccine discussion and debate in a public forum.
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), set to meet Feb. 25-27, is expected to discuss the recently updated childhood vaccine schedule. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and its cohorts are attempting to suppress open exchange through a court-ordered injunction scheduled for a hearing on Feb. 13.
Shouting Down Dissent
In January, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention cut the number of recommended vaccines for American children from 17 to 11 following an executive order to investigate the vaccine schedule. The comparative report found that the U.S. schedule demands far more injections than other developed nations. Several vaccines on the schedule had never undergone large-scale double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials before being approved by the Food and Drug Administration, safety reviews have been incomplete or nonexistent for decades, and liability protections for vaccine makers incentivize production over protection.
The update is reasonable, aligning the U.S. with most other developed nations; but the American Academy of Pediatrics responded with outrage, blasting the government’s “dangerous” decision-making and adding another complaint to its 2025 lawsuit against Health and Human Services (HHS).
The updated recommendations are “causing unnecessary confusion … compromising access to lifesaving vaccines and weakening community protection,” railed American Academy of Pediatrics President Dr. Andrew D. Racine. A co-plaintiff organization official warned of the threat of “increased illness and suffering by children and their families,” if the updated schedule is enacted.
None of this is expected based on comparative data, but the American Academy of Pediatrics’ response continues to follow the same pattern — shout down dissent and sue to suppress debate.
In June, the American Academy of Pediatrics protested HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s removal of all 17 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices members, calling Kennedy’s replacement picks “vaccine skeptics” and the overhaul “an escalating effort by the Administration to silence independent medical expertise and stoke distrust in lifesaving vaccines.”
The group then sued Kennedy for allegedly violating federal law in changing Covid-19 vaccine recommendations for children and pregnant women, amended the suit multiple times with additional complaints, and filed for an injunction to stop Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices from meeting altogether later this month.
Targeting Advisory Committee
The Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices’ power is in its influence on the CDC, which traditionally adopts the panel’s vaccine recommendations. Since the CDC published the new recommendations independent of the ACIP, the only threat the meeting now poses is its free speech forum, open to the public via a live stream. For years the AAP has utilized the space to collaborate with ACIP members, but has now boycotted the meetings, forfeiting open engagement and carrying on its fearmongering campaign through press releases, statements, and litigation.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has reason to feel emboldened in its vaccine dictatorship and sidelining of dissent. An Obama-appointed U.S. district judge recently granted a preliminary injunction to restore canceled HHS grant money to the AAP, siding with the claim that HHS cut funding to the group as “part of a retaliatory campaign designed to chill AAP’s speech on vaccines and other important public-health issues.”
If cutting funding equates to a retaliatory First Amendment rights infringement in the current court of law, disagreement could weaponize any party’s demands.
Recommendations, Dictates
While the CDC’s recommendations hold sway, true power lies in the hands of state leaders who dictate mandates for public institutions. The American Academy of Pediatrics maintains an authoritative position in mainstream medicine over major medical groups and state leaders. Multiple Democrat-run states announced medical “alliances” in the fall, allying with the AAP against the CDC. Late last month 27 states and the District of Columbia followed the AAP’s lead in publicly rejecting the CDC’s updated pediatric vaccine schedule.
The loudest argument from the left, other than imminent catastrophe if vaccination numbers drop, is lack of access. Recommendations from government health agencies influence insurer coverage. The CDC has sidestepped that battle by committing to full coverage of vaccines recommended in 2025 for government health plan beneficiaries who want them.
Parent Power
Though the American Academy of Pediatrics and other medical groups have maligned the government as the perpetrator in declining immunization rates, parents have driven this change for years. A lack of trust in public health authorities has only increased since the widespread lockdowns and vaccination mandates of the early 2020s. Public health authorities cannot determine every individual’s best treatment; current CDC leadership is wisely handing off that responsibility to “physicians and parents, who know the child.”
Kennedy’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices members have tread the vaccine line with caution, maintaining the majority of entrenched standards, recommending conservative changes, and extolling parent-driven choice in pediatrics. The American Academy of Pediatrics is wasting time fighting small-scale discussions while large-scale accountability looms.
Ashley Bateman is a policy writer for The Heartland Institute. Her work has been featured in The Washington Times, The Daily Caller, The New York Post, The American Thinker, the Ascension Press blog, and numerous other publications. She previously worked as an adjunct scholar for The Lexington Institute and as editor, writer, and photographer for The Warner Weekly, a publication for the American military community in Bamberg, Germany.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.