Search This Blog

Friday, April 24, 2026

TerraPower Commences Construction of Utility-Scale Advanced Reactor

 TerraPower has officially broken ground on Kemmerer Unit 1 in Wyoming, set to become America’s first utility-scale advanced nuclear power plant.

The April 23 announcement marks the start of full construction on the Natrium reactor, a 345-megawatt sodium-cooled fast reactor paired with a molten salt-based energy storage system that can ramp output to 500 megawatts for over five hours to handle peak demand.

The project sits near a retiring coal plant in Kemmerer, making it Wyoming’s first commercial nuclear generating station. Non-nuclear site preparation began in June 2024 after years of engineering and regulatory hurdles. 

The DOE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program provided public-private backing, with Bechtel handling engineering, procurement and construction, and GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy contributing reactor technology. 

With commercial operations targeted around 2030, The U.S. may finally get on the board for having a utility scale reactor under construction…

As we reported when the NRC granted the construction permit in March, this step represents the start of actual nuclear facility construction. Up until now, all the work at the site has been for the non-nuclear systems. We also covered TerraPower’s agreement with Meta for up to eight Natrium plants by 2035 to support data center power needs.

TerraPower President and CEO Chris Levesque described the moment as one the industry has been working towards for a generation. “We’re not just breaking new ground on a first-of-a-kind nuclear plant in Wyoming; we’re building the next generation of America’s energy infrastructure.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/terrapower-commences-construction-utility-scale-advanced-reactor

Mamdani to meet King Charles III at 9/11 memorial during royal’s US visit

 Mayor Zohran Mamdani is expected to meet King Charles III when the royal takes a trip across the pond next week, according to a report.  

The democratic socialist and the British monarch will attend a wreath laying at the 9/11 memorial in downtown Manhattan on Wednesday, two people familiar with the planning told Politico.

The mayor’s office stressed in a statement that Mamdani and the king “will not meet privately.”

“He was invited to join a number of New York elected officials next week at a wreath laying at the 9/11 memorial with members of the British royal family,” senior City Hall spokesperson Dora Pekec said.

Other government bigwigs, including former mayor Michael Bloomberg, will also be on hand for the event, according to Politico.

The expected face-to-face is part of King Charles’ three-day visit to the US next week, which also includes a state dinner at the White House, a source previously told The Post.

The meet-up is part of King Charles’ three-day visit to the US next week, which also includes a state dinner at the White House.via REUTERS
King Charles III (left) with President Donald Trump at Windsor Castle, Berkshire, before formally bidding farewell to the president on day two of their state visit to the UK, September 18, 2025.via REUTERSHe is also expected to address a joint meeting of Congress during his trip.

Charles’ late mother, Queen Elizabeth II, made the last state visit by a member of the royal family in 2007.

President Trump met Charles after he visited Queen Elizabeth in June 2019 and again last year. 

Charles became king after his mother’s death in 2022. 

https://nypost.com/2026/04/24/us-news/mayor-mamdani-to-meet-king-charles-iii-at-9-11-memorial-during-royals-us-visit/

Mamdani to veto NYC schools ‘buffer zone’ bill to protect anti-ICE, anti-Israel student protesters

 Mayor Zohran Mamdani will veto a bill creating a “buffer zone” around schools for protests because he worries it’ll stifle demonstrations against ICE or in support of Palestinian rights. 

The move announced Friday would be the first veto of Mamdani’s tenure, likely killing the bill sponsored by Eric Dinowitz (D-Bronx) — which passed the City Council 30-19, just shy of a veto-proof majority.

The potential law was identical to another bill, which passed the same day last month, that requires a no-protest zone to be set up around synagogues and other houses of worship in the Big Apple.

But the religious buffer zone bill, which had been championed by Speaker Julie Menin (D-Manhattan), sailed through the council on the same day with an overwhelming majority, 44-5.

Hizzoner, along with his lefty comrades, has signaled skepticism over Dinowitz’s no-protest zones outside schools.

Sources said Mamdani has informed the council he plans to sign the veto as early as Friday morning.

News of the expected veto was first reported by the New York Times.

The New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America went on full offense ahead of the vote in late March, launching a phone bank campaign to drum up support to try to kill both of the bills.

Anti-Israel protesters outside NYU on May 3, 2024.Getty Images

“These bills expand the capacity of the NYPD to police and surveil Black, brown, and immigrant New Yorkers, jeopardizing the safety of protestors exercising their First Amendment rights and students attending school,” they wrote.

Mamdani hasn’t publicly supported the buffer zones around houses of worship, but notably did not clap during Gov. Kathy Hochul’s State of the State speech when she first pitched the 25-foot protest-free zone.

City Hall did not immediately responded for comment.

“Ensuring students can enter and exit their schools without fear of harassment or intimidation should not be controversial,” said Menin. “This bill simply requires the NYPD to clearly outline how it will ensure safe access when there are threats of obstruction or physical injury, while fully protecting First Amendment rights.”

Anti-Israel protesters outside NYU on May 3, 2024.Getty Images

The mayor said in a statement that he will not veto the buffer zone bill for religious institutions but that he had a “problem” with how the bill “widely … defines an educational institution.”

“As the bill is written, everywhere from universities to museums to teaching hospitals could face restrictions,” Mamdani said. “This could impact workers protesting ICE, or college students demanding their school divest from fossil fuels or demonstrating in support of Palestinian rights.”

“Int. 175-B is not a narrow public safety measure; it is a piece of legislation that has alarmed much of the labor movement, reproductive rights groups, and immigration advocates, among others, across this City. Nearly a dozen unions have raised the alarm about its impact on their ability to organize.”

https://nypost.com/2026/04/24/us-news/zohran-mamdani-to-veto-nyc-schools-buffer-zone-bill-to-protect-anti-ice-pro-palestinian-student-protesters/

Rick Scott: Mamdani made Ken Griffin a target — and cemented NYC’s death spiral

 Last week, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani stood outside Ken Griffin’s apartment building and grinned, “Today we’re taxing the rich.”

He said it like he was declaring victory.

It was actually a eulogy for one of the greatest cities in the world.

I know what happens when you get tax policy right, because I watched it happen when I was governor of Florida.

For years, my state has taken advantage of the way New York drove its residents and its most productive businesses straight to our door.

They brought their income, their companies, their employees, their charitable contributions and their tax dollars with them.

Florida won; New York lost — and Mamdani has decided to double down on failure.

“Tax the rich” (or as de facto Democratic Party spokesperson Hasan Piker would probably put it, “Kill the rich”) has become the rallying cry for a party that either doesn’t understand the competitive landscape between states, or doesn’t understand basic math.

For them, here’s a lesson in how the socialism death spiral works.

You tax the wealthy and job creators at punishing rates.

They flee — and the tax base shrinks.

You’re left with a budget hole.

Democrats decide the answer is to tax whoever remains even more.

More people leave; the hole gets bigger.

Repeat until your city or state is broke and completely unrecognizable, while denying that you created the problem.

Any observer can see this is happening to New York — except its rulers.

The Empire State has no clothes.

This month, Mamdani and Gov. Kathy Hochul announced New York’s first-ever pied-à-terre tax, an annual surcharge on properties valued above $5 million when the owner’s primary residence is outside New York City.

They claim it will generate $500 million a year, but they won’t tell you what comes next.

The moment those owners decide a $5 million property in a city that resents them isn’t worth the annual bill, they sell.

The revenue disappears, and property values overall soften.

That’s not a budget fix; it’s a spiteful political campaign targeting the very people who keep the city’s finances afloat.

Which brings me back to Ken Griffin, who not coincidentally moved himself and his company’s headquarters from Chicago to South Florida in 2022.

His Citadel hedge fund and Citadel Securities still employ thousands of people in New York City, generating good-paying jobs, local spending and a tax contribution that dwarfs almost any other single resident.

Griffin’s lifetime charitable giving exceeds $2 billion.

He recently committed $400 million to New York’s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

He’s personally committed $10 million to help Citadel employees serve on nonprofit boards supporting health, anti-poverty and education organizations across the city, like Harlem Lacrosse and the New York Piano Society.

So what does Mamdani do?

He makes Griffin a political target.

He stands outside Griffin’s home to name and shame him in a slick social media video.

The city’s own mayor villainizes a man who employs thousands, pays an enormous local tax bill and has donated billions to causes benefiting New Yorkers.

This isn’t governance — it’s class warfare dressed up as policy.

And now, Griffin is threatening to abandon New York City altogether.

There’s a different way.

When I became governor of Florida, my administration cut taxes by more than $10 billion, reformed permitting, eliminated more than 5,000 needless regulations and recruited businesses aggressively.

The best anti-poverty program any government can support is a job, and Florida built 1.7 million of them by getting government out of the way.

I grew up in public housing, so I feel genuine sympathy for the working-class New Yorkers who can’t pick up and move out.

They will bear the heaviest burden of this socialist vision that’s taking over New York, losing wages and opportunities while the politicians who caused the damage pat themselves on the back.

To be clear, good economies don’t last forever — something leaders in Florida and other red-state beneficiaries of New York’s decline should keep keenly in mind.

It takes constant, daily work to keep growing jobs and improving people’s lives.

It’s not just a tax cut here or there, it’s a consistent focus on making states affordable for all families — which is why I’ve never supported a tax or fee increase and never will.

The competition between states gets more intense every day.

Blue states want to tax their way into prosperity, but it always fails.

Mamdani can keep hosting photo ops outside billionaires’ buildings.

Meanwhile, the people funding his city’s budget will keep doing what New Yorkers have been doing for years: They’ll call the movers.

Rick Scott represents Florida in the US Senate and served as the state’s governor.

https://nypost.com/2026/04/23/opinion/mamdani-targeted-ken-griffin-cementing-nycs-death-spiral/

Virginia Public Schools’ Mental Health Misstep

 Around midnight on April 13, Governor Abigail Spanberger signed into law HB355, which directs a state advisory committee and the Department of Education to study and make recommendations for a universal mental-health screening program for public school students in grades six through 12.

The new law doesn’t mandate a program yet, but that’s clearly the goal. As originally drafted, the legislation sought to do so by next school year, and the study of “evidence-based,” recommended “best practices” that the law requires will create a framework for future implementation.

The mental-health industry peddles universal screening—brief questionnaires given to all students—as “preventive,” “evidence-based,” or necessary to improve academic outcomes. That’s all false. High-quality research over several decades has failed to find mental-health or academic benefits from universal screening programs.

Widespread screening does, however, produce alarmingly high rates of false positives, leading to harmful misdiagnoses. One study published by Cambridge University showed a false-positive rate as high as 90 percent. That’s why Virginians (and all Americans) should push back against efforts to introduce universal mental-health screenings in schools.

In recent years, school districts across the country have begun requiring students to answer personal questions about emotions, behaviors, and suicidal thoughts. The practice has become widespread, with at least one-third of schools reporting that they administer mental-health screenings. Last year Illinois became the first state to mandate that all schools administer universal screenings to students in third through twelfth grade.

Most students that such screenings flag as “at risk” are merely feeling the normal stresses of life, so the scrutiny often leads to unwarranted labeling and intervention. By design, screening interprets emotions through a medical lens, construing any sign of anxiousness, inattention, or distress as a potential clinical disorder. But there’s simply no foolproof way to confirm mental-health disorders—no biomarkers, blood tests, or brain scans. Ordinary worry can easily be misconstrued as anxiety disorder, sadness as clinical depression.

Serious mental illnesses causing functional impairment affect only about 5 percent of Americans, and these conditions typically don’t develop until the late teens and early twenties. If America’s nearly 50 million public school kids were screened annually for rare conditions, the majority flagged would be false positives, leading potentially to millions of children being wrongly shuffled into the mental-health system.

Misidentification has consequences. Even a provisional diagnosis can change a child’s self-understanding or how adults interpret that child’s behavior. Youth mental-health treatments are also limited: few are truly evidence-based or effective, and both therapy and medication can be harmful for those who don’t need it.

The downsides of universal screening outweigh any potential benefits. This is why it’s not recommended by Canada or the U.K. in primary-care settings (and is recommended only provisionally in the U.S.—without supportive evidence). Yet schools, which lack the safeguards or expertise of the health-care system, have adopted screening at scale.

At doctor’s offices, parents are significantly less comfortable when practitioners directly administer mental-health assessments to children (as opposed to questionnaires being completed by parents), when results aren’t discussed with a physician or psychologist, and when topics cover certain mental-health conditions, thoughts of suicide, and gender identity. All these undesirable aspects are typical of universal school screenings. Fewer than half of parents support depression screening that starts in sixth grade, as Virginia nearly mandated with HB355.

Parents also overwhelmingly want to be informed when screenings happen, but schools often administer these programs with minimal parental awareness or consent. Virginia’s new law already specifies that mandatory screening, when implemented, must be provided on an opt-out, not opt-in, basis. That puts the burden on parents to discover whether a screening is planned, to refuse participation, and to do so quickly, because the school will deem their lack of a timely “no” as consent. Further, in most cases, including Virginia’s, the law does not require schools to track parental consent systematically. This explains how one survey of school counselors showed that 75 percent admitted to administering surveys without explicit permission.

Struggling students shouldn’t be ignored, but universal screening, ironically, does just that. The screening process doesn’t identify the students most in need of support. They’re already known to teachers and staff, who are trained to notice distress, academic decline, and signs of instability at home; or they have been evaluated in other assessments already, such as those for special education or accommodations.

The problem isn’t identification—it’s that students with identified needs routinely go without adequate support. If schools can’t help the struggling students they already know about, how will anyone benefit from flagging even more kids?

It’s time to say no to universal mental-health screening.