Search This Blog

Tuesday, March 16, 2021

Suspension of AstraZeneca shots is 'political decision': Italy's medicines regulator head

 The decision by Germany, France and Italy to suspend AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 shots after several countries reported possible serious side-effects is a “political one”, the director general of Italy’s medicines authority AIFA said on Tuesday.

“We got to the point of a suspension because several European countries, including Germany and France, preferred to interrupt vaccinations... to put them on hold in order to carry out checks. The choice is a political one,” Nicola Magrini told daily la Repubblica in an interview.

Magrini said that the AstraZeneca vaccine was safe and that the benefit to risk ratio of the jab is “widely positive”. There have been eight deaths and four cases of serious side-effects following vaccinations in Italy, he added.

Aifa will take two to three days to collect all required data and once “doubts are cleared we can carry on at a faster speed than before,” Magrini said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-italy-astrazeneca/suspension-of-astrazeneca-shots-is-political-decision-italys-medicines-regulator-head-idUSKBN2B80KK

New coronavirus variant found in French region of Brittany

A new coronavirus variant has been found in the French region of Brittany, said the French health ministry in a statement late on Monday, adding that initial analysis did not show this new variant to be more serious or transmissible than others.

The health ministry said the new variant had been found in a cluster of cases in a hospital centre in Lannion.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-france-variant/new-coronavirus-variant-found-in-french-region-of-brittany-french-government-idUSKBN2B80GQ

German COVID-19 cases are growing exponentially again

 Coronavirus infections are rising exponentially in Germany, an expert at the Robert Koch Institute for infectious diseases said on Tuesday, adding that the risk of AstraZeneca’s vaccine was relatively low.

The number of cases per 100,000 reported on Tuesday was 83.7, up from 68 a week ago, and the RKI has said that metric could reach 200 by the middle of next month.

“We are exactly on the flank of the third wave(of the COVID-19 pandemic). That can no longer be disputed. And at this point we have eased the restrictions and that is speeding up the exponential growth,” Dirk Brockmann, an epidemiologist at the RKI, told Germany’s ARD television.

Chancellor Angela Merkel and state leaders agreed a phased easing of curbs earlier this month along with an “emergency brake” to let authorities reimpose restrictions if case numbers rise above 100 per 100,000 on three consecutive days.

On Tuesday, the number of cases per 100,000 rose to 83.7, up from 68 a week ago, and the RKI has said that metric could reach 200 by the middle of next month.

On Monday, Germany suspended use of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine, making it the latest of several European countries to hit “pause” following reports of blood coagulation disorders in recipients.

The decision followed a recommendation from the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), Germany’s authority in charge of vaccines, following seven cases of thrombosis, including three deaths.

A planned meeting between Merkel and state leaders on Wednesday to discuss using family doctors to administer COVID-19 vaccines has been postponed until after the European Medicines Agency completes its review into the AstraZeneca shot, a government spokesman said.

AstraZeneca has said an analysis of its safety data covering reported cases from over 17 million vaccine doses given had shown no evidence of an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis or thrombocytopenia - having low levels of platelets.

Brockmann said it made sense to explain the relative risks to the population, noting that 1,000 people in a million had died of COVID-19, compared to possibly 1 in a million from complications associated with the vaccine.

“In the risk groups, the risk of dying of COVID is much, much higher. That means it is probably 100,000 times more likely to die of COVID than because of an AstraZeneca vaccine,” he said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-germany/german-covid-19-cases-are-growing-exponentially-again-rki-idUSKBN2B80KE

Monday, March 15, 2021

Acadia hit by unexpected FDA feedback

 

  • Acadia Pharmaceuticals saw its share price cut almost in half Tuesday morning, following news that the company's drug approval application has run into an unexpected and potentially significant obstacle.
  • Acadia said that, since submitting the application last June, the Food and Drug Administration has consistently found no issues with it. That was, until last week, when the FDA informed Acadia about "deficiencies" which prevent the discussion of marketing requirements at this time. While not an outright rejection, the agency's feedback appears to have significantly lowered the odds of approval.
  • The drug in question, called pimavanserin, has been on the market for several years, sold under the brand name Nuplazid for the treatment of Parkinson's disease psychosis. With its application, Acadia had hoped to expand the pimavanserin label to include dementia-related psychosis — a condition which, estimates hold, affects millions of people.

In 2016, after more than a decade of clinical testing, Acadia scored its first product in Nuplazid, which remains the only FDA-approved treatment for hallucinations and delusions experienced by some Parkinson's patients. Net product sales from Nuplazid totaled $442 million in 2020, an increase of 30% from 2019.

But in the years since Nuplazid's launch, Acadia, which works in the high-risk, high-reward area of brain drug research, has had trouble locking down another approval. It wanted to get pimavanserin cleared for schizophrenia patients who don't respond well to antipsychotic therapy, but disappointing results from a late-stage study set that program back.

Acadia has fared better testing pimavanserin against dementia-related psychosis, which carries similarities to the drug's original indication. In fact, Acadia stopped a late-stage study in that population early, after an independent group monitoring the trial found clear signs the drug was working.

The company went on to seek approval of pimavanserin in dementia-related psychosis, and expected to hear the FDA's decision by early April.

The agency's latest feedback, though, indicates that Acadia's attempts to grow the pimavanserin brand will likely face another setback. Investors appear to be bracing for a full rejection, as Acadia's share price plummeted from $46 Monday afternoon to about $24 Tuesday morning.

"We were extremely surprised and disappointed to receive such a communication from the FDA, and to receive it so late in the review cycle," Steve Davis, Acadia's CEO, said during an unusually forthcoming call with investors on Monday.

According to Acadia, the FDA had twice communicated there were no potential issues with the supplementary application. The first of those communications happened last July, when the agency agreed to evaluate the drug, and then again in December during the middle of its review.

What's more, Acadia claims the FDA did not want to hold a meeting in which outside experts go over the application and make recommendations about whether to approve or reject it. Such meetings are typical when the FDA has outstanding questions or concerns about a drug's benefits and risks.

On the investor call, Acadia executives said the FDA hasn't yet specified what problems were found in the application, much to the company's frustration.

"We immediately and repeatedly have been pushing the FDA. We escalated the issue," Davis said on the call. "We just don't have any feedback from them yet. They told us twice they don't have any additional questions for us, and that's where things stand at the moment."

Though Acadia said it intends to work with the agency to resolve the apparent issues, analysts don't expect a positive turnaround before the April 3 approval deadline.

"It appears the review process was proceeding as expected," wrote Vamil Divan of Mizuho Securities, in a note to clients, "so it is unclear to us what led to the FDA's questions at this time."

Divan and his team now believe the odds that pimavanserin gets approved in dementia-related psychosis are lower — at 70% versus 80% previously — and expect the drug's launch to be pushed back one year.

https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/acadia-surprise-fda-feedback-pimavanserin/596374/

Lilly lays out 2-year plan to gain approval for Alzheimer's drug

 Eli Lilly will expand an ongoing mid-stage study of its experimental Alzheimer's disease drug donanemab with the aim of obtaining enough data to seek approval from the Food and Drug Administration.

The announcement Monday of the drugmaker's regulatory plan follows results from a Phase 2 trial which were published in the New England Journal of Medicine Saturday. The study's topline success — noteworthy in a field with a long history of drug failures — had raised long-shot hopes from some investors and analysts that Lilly might be able to ask for an accelerated OK sooner.

Lilly shares fell 9% on Monday, erasing nearly $20 billion of the company's market value.

The upsized trial, called TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2, is meant to replicate the findings of the 257-patient TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, which found donanemab slowed Alzheimer's progression by a third when measured using a disease rating scale that assesses cognition and function.

"In my world, for years we have said a 25% difference in decline would be clinically significant," said Pierre Tariot, director of the Banner Alzheimer's Institute in Arizona. "That's admittedly arbitrary but it's a standard that's been espoused for at least a decade. This average difference suggests that there are some individuals who show very little decline and that would be great."

Tariot pointed to the drug's effects on the toxic amyloid plaques that accumulate in the brains of Alzheimer's patients, and the trial's main finding of slowed decline as factors experts will be watching closely.

But while the trial's principal outcome gave some like Tariot reason for optimism, inconsistent data on other measures weakened the study's findings.

In particular, donanemab did not prove statistically superior over placebo on a rating scale known as CDR-SB, which is commonly used in other Alzheimer's drug trials and was originally the main goal of TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2.

Aiming to improve the chance of success for its second study, Lilly executives said Monday they will enroll 1,000 more volunteers into the trial than they had initial planned, as well as change the goal to the composite measure that was met in the now-completed TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 1 trial.

The additional Alzheimer's patients Lilly plans to recruit will be similar to those who appeared to respond to treatment in the first study, specifically people with intermediate levels in their brains of a protein called tau.

Tau is associated with Alzheimer's disease decline; those with high levels are thought to be too far along to benefit from drugs like donanemab, while those with too little aren't likely to worsen over the course of an 18-month study. Donemab binds to and removes amyloid plaques, which are also characteristic of Alzheimer's and have been the central hypothesis for treating the disease.

So far, Lilly has enrolled patients into TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 who have both high and intermediate levels of tau accumulation. Participants with high levels will now be excluded from the primary analysis of the trial, although Lilly said it will continue to study them.

Enrollment of additional volunteers is expected to complete later this year. Lilly executives said they anticipate the trial will deliver data in early 2023.

"Our base case expectation remains that TRAILBLAZER 1 and TRAILBLAZER 2, together as two positive trials, will be required for approval," Lilly chief scientific officer Dan Skovronsky said in a call with analysts on Monday.

Regulatory developments — particularly the possibility that the FDA could approve a similar drug from Biogen despite mixed data that includes one major trial failure — could still alter Lilly's regulatory strategy, however. The agency is expected to make a decision on Biogen's drug, called aducanumab, by June 7.

Asked by analysts, Skovronsky emphasized the need to show a clear-cut benefit for his company's drug. "[Donanemab] should not be launched in the face of controversial data," he said.

While some analysts had earlier predicted Lilly could submit donanemab for approval on the basis of TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 1 data alone, the detailed results disclosed Saturday appeared to close the door on that possibility.

"The data increases the likelihood of the need for additional studies to obtain FDA approval," wrote Cantor Fitzgerald's Louise Chen, one of those who had suggested a clear data set from TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 1 could support a regulatory submission.

Others were more critical, noting study data showing that, while two-thirds of patients receiving donanemab became "amyloid negative," that effect didn't seem to translate to a large clinical difference.

"The chance of a meaningful clinical effect size from removing plaque is off the table," Brian Skorney, an analyst at Baird, wrote in a March 15 note to clients.

https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/lilly-alzheimer-drug-donanemab-phase-3-trial/596729/

Brazil eyes July for full local production of AstraZeneca vaccine

 Brazil could begin full production of AstraZeneca Plc’s COVID-19 vaccine by July if regulators allow, an official at biomedical center Fiocruz said, moving up by 100 days the timeline to produce shots without imported ingredients.

Fiocruz Vice President Marco Krieger told Reuters that, if health regulator Anvisa waives some controls, the biomedical institute could move up the Sept. 30 target date for 100% local production of the shot by AstraZeneca and Oxford University.

“This would be important at a time when Brazil is facing vaccine shortages,” Krieger said in an interview on Friday.

Delays in getting supplies from India and China have slowed Fiocruz’s finishing line and Brazil’s vaccination program. Only 6% of Brazil’s adult population has had their first of two shots.

Federally funded Fiocruz, based in Rio de Janeiro, has delivered 4 million ready-made vaccines from India and is filling and finishing shots with active ingredients from China. Delivery of those doses, starting this week, is expected tototal 100.4 million by July. Fully local production of the vaccine is scheduled for September, when Fiocruz plans to start delivery of 110 million doses for Brazil’s immunization program.

Given the urgent need for vaccines in Brazil, which lost more than 12,000 lives to the pandemic last week alone, Krieger said he hoped Anvisa would help to shorten that timeline.

As the vaccine is already in use in Europe and elsewhere, Krieger said Fiocruz may be able to get Anvisa’s approval after the regulator supervises production of just one batch, rather than the customary three batches.

Along with the 4 million AstraZeneca doses, Brazil’s government has received 20.6 million doses of CoronaVac, made by China’s Sinovac Biotech Ltd and bottled by Sao Paulo’s Butantan Institute with active ingredients from China.

On Friday, Anvisa granted final approval for AstraZeneca’s vaccine. CoronaVac has been approved for emergency use.

Krieger said output from Fiocruz should reach 1 million doses a day by the end of March. By then, Fiocruz will have received another shipment of ingredients from China to make 30 million doses, he said.

Krieger did not address the British vaccine being halted last week in Denmark, Norway and Iceland over bleeding and clotting issues.

AstraZeneca said on Sunday a review of safety data of people vaccinated with its COVID-19 vaccine has shown no evidence of increased risk of blood clots.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-brazil-astrazeneca/brazil-eyes-july-for-full-local-production-of-astrazeneca-vaccine-idUSKBN2B72IU

Are vaccines safe in patients with Long COVID?

 

David T ArnoldAlice MilneEmma SammsLouise StadonNick A MaskellFergus W Hamilton