Search This Blog

Wednesday, December 13, 2023

'Wall Street has discovered what's really driving U.S. stocks higher in 2023'

 The Fed may be shrinking its balance sheet. But liquidity in the U.S. financial system is expanding, helping to drive a 'QE-like' rally.

At this point, stock-market professionals can recite a litany of explanations for why the U.S. market has marched higher this year.

But a group of Wall Street strategists believe chalking up the equity market's gains to signs that the U.S. economy is heading for a "soft landing," or that the Federal Reserve could aggressively cut interest rates next year, doesn't tell the full story.

Those who have been trawling about for a more comprehensive explanation have found their answer by closely scrutinizing the balance sheets of the world's largest central banks, with a particular emphasis on the Fed.

Here's what they found: That while the Fed has been paring back the size of its balance sheet, beneath the surface, central banks have boosted support for markets by allowing bank reserves to expand, increasing the amount of capital available to be deployed into markets and the economy.

Historically, when this happens, securities prices rise, even if their advance doesn't seem justified based on the strength of the economy, or the outlook for corporate earnings, according to research from former Citigroup strategist Matt King, who now runs Satori Insights, his own independent research shop.

"It is reserve changes that correlate best with markets. They are correlated to changes in equities and changes in credit spreads, and there is just enough of a lag that it can't be that way round," King told MarketWatch during a phone interview.

So how is liquidity increasing?

At first brush, this explanation might seem contradictory.

Some investors might wonder how the Fed can simultaneously inject more liquidity into the financial system while reducing the size of its balance sheet.

But according to King, the fact that the Fed has reduced its bondholdings to $7.8 trillion, from $9 trillion at its peak last year, isn't what investors should be focusing on.

Instead of the Fed's shrinking balance sheet, what really matters is how reserves in the U.S. banking system have increased by $500 billion since January, according to King.

The Fed isn't alone in this. Instead of withdrawing $1 trillion in liquidity after declaring war on inflation in 2022, the world's biggest central banks instead injected roughly an equivalent amount, King's research shows.

Rising bank reserves are being driven by a number of factors, including the continuing drain of the Fed's reverse-repo facility. Counterparties have removed more than $1 trillion from the facility since April, according to Fed data.

The wave of liquidity support for markets began late last year, around the time the S&P 500 bottomed in October 2022. Initially, it was driven by the Bank of Japan, People's Bank of China and European Central Bank, King said.

Then the Fed joined the party in earnest in the spring, when it moved to support the U.S. banking system following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. More recently, the drain of money out of the Fed's reverse-repo facility has been the main driver.

Wall Street takes notice

King is hardly alone in taking a close look at liquidity. Recently, top strategists at Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group and other investment banks have discussed the impact that the RRP drain and money flowing out of the Treasury General Account has had on markets.

"The first 10 days of December continued the recent trends of expanding U.S. liquidity, driven by draws from the RRP facility and the Treasury General Account," said a team of cross-asset analysts at Goldman Sachs in a recent report obtained by MarketWatch.

"Together with the lagged-behind effects from the U.S. policy impulse easing in the aftermath of the regional-bank funding pressures earlier in the year, the high liquidity should support risk-asset performance and tight credit spreads into year-end," the Goldman team added.

By Goldman's count, banking reserves expanded by roughly $50 billion on net during the first week of December alone.

Strategists at the investment bank expect this trend should continue to support stocks through January, until the Treasury releases its next update on its plans for issuing bonds and Treasury bills, which could impact the reverse-repo facility. The facility has already seen more than $1 trillion depart since April, according to the Fed's data.

'QE-like' returns

If the liquidity impulse fades, stocks could run into trouble, King said.

But whatever happens early next year, King hopes to convey that if the market's rebound in 2023 seemed "QE-like" - a reference to the Fed's postcrisis and postpandemic bond-buying programs - then there is a reason for that.

U.S. stock indexes have now erased all of their losses from last year, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA finishing Wednesday at a fresh record north of 37,000.

The S&P 500 SPX has gained 22.6% through Wednesday's close to 4,707.09, its highest closing level since January 2022.

Meanwhile, the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite COMP is up more than 40% year to date.

"There is a reason why QE is so powerful," King said. "QE creates new money in the form of reserves, but not only that, it withdraws bonds and bills from the market, so the private sector then has more money, and fewer places to invest that money."

"When reserves change, that alters the balance between how much money private investors have got, and the amount of securities available to invest in," he said.

"When you give investors less money, and more securities to invest in, then we see prices go down. Reserves were coming down in 2022 when everything was selling off. But this year, that has stopped."

https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/202312131009/wall-street-has-discovered-whats-really-driving-us-stocks-higher-in-2023-the-explanation-isnt-as-simple-as-one-might-expect

"Most Of The World Was Against Me": Djokovic: Not Anti-Vaccine, But 'Pro-Freedom To Choose'

 The world's #1 tennis player Novak Djokovic says that he's not against vaccination - he's for people's right to choose for themselves.

Djokovic, who faced significant backlash for his vaccination status, especially in Australia, told 60 Minutes about the ordeal, saying he was "basically declared as a villain of the world," after refusing to take the Covid-19 vaccine in early 2022. While he initially received a vaccine exemption to play in the Australian Open, public outcry led to Australian immigration minister Alex Hawke revoking his visa, barring him from competition, and then deporting the tennis pro on the grounds that he was a "high-profile unvaccinated individual" who could influence public sentiment about vaccination.

"People tried to, you know, declare me as an anti-vax. I'm not anti-vax. Nor I am pro-vax. I'm pro-freedom to choose," he said.

"Most of the world [was] against me. I had that kind of experience on the tennis court with crowds that were not maybe cheering me on. But I never had this particular experience before in my life," he continued.

This decision, which led to Djokovic's exclusion from the Australian Open and subsequent U.S. Open, was met with a mix of criticism and support, while the legal battle that ensued raised questions about the role of public figures in influencing health decisions.

Djokovic's lawyers argued that his presence was not a risk to public health and that the visa cancellation could actually fuel anti-vaccination sentiment. However, the court sided with the minister, suggesting Djokovic’s choices could indeed foster anti-vaccination views.

Greg Barns S.C., spokesman for the Australian Lawyers Alliance, described the visa ban as “troubling” in a free society. Yet, the Australian government later overturned the ban, allowing Djokovic to participate in the 2023 Australian Open.

Amidst this controversy, a broader conversation emerged about vaccinating athletes. A letter by cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough and structural biologist Panagis Polykretis revealed a startling number of cardiac arrests and major medical issues in vaccinated athletes, raising concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in high-performance sports.

"Important reminder that Djokovic has NEVER said he was against vaccines. He even confirmed that he had all the vaccines as a child but when it came to the brand new Covid vaccine he was an advocate of freedom of choice and that everyone should be free to make their own decisions," said Pavvy G, a tennis blogger, in a Dec. 9 post on X, the Epoch Times reports.

Moderna, a key player in vaccine development, reportedly placed Djokovic on a "vaccine misinformation" watch list. His victory at the Moderna-sponsored U.S. Open was seen by some as a challenge to vaccine mandates, with social media users highlighting the irony of his unvaccinated status in a tournament sponsored by a leading vaccine manufacturer.

The pharma company claimed that unvaccinated people were celebrating his win, with social media users “mockingly” pointing out that Moderna was the sponsor of the competition. The firm said that the “optics of Djokovic” bolster “anti-vaccine claims that vaccines—and mandates—are unnecessary.” -Epoch Times

Bravo for standing your ground, Novak.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/most-world-was-against-me-djokovic-says-hes-not-anti-vaccine-pro-freedom-choose

Detransitioner suing Academy of Pediatrics: ‘I don’t want this to happen to other young girls’

A Florida woman who medically transitioned from female to male as a 14-year-old is suing the American Academy of Pediatrics — alleging she was whisked through the process as a minor by “a collection of actors who prioritized politics and ideology over children’s safety, health, and well-being.”

Isabelle Ayala, now 20, is also suing her doctors in Rhode Island in a first of its kind case, filed in Providence/Bristol County Superior Court.

“I just really don’t want this to happen to other vulnerable young girls,” Ayala, who lives in Wellington, Florida, told The Post. “I don’t want puberty to be the enemy. I don’t want our natural biology to be the enemy.”

Her story is the subject of a new documentary produced by the Independent Women’s Forum.

“What I find so interesting about Isabel is that she’s a soft-spoken individual and not someone seeking out attention,” IWF director of storytelling and executive producer Kelsey Bolar told The Post. “She’s really doing this for the right reasons.”

Ayala says she was sexually assaulted as a child and began precocious puberty at age 8 — both experiences she says made her resent her femininity and believe she was better off male.

Ayala came out as transgender at age 12.Independent Women's Forum

“I decided to transition because of just a series of unfortunate things that I had tied to being female. And those things made me hate being female,” Ayala said.

At 11, she found solace in the transgender activist community on Tumblr, and thought, “This is going to fix me.”

She learned from trans activists that fabricating suicidal ideation is a surefire way to get a testosterone prescription quickly. So, at age 14 she did just that: “I learned that from the internet that… I had to convince [my doctors and family] that if they don’t affirm me, I’m gonna kill myself.”

Ayala said she was referred to a gender clinic and diagnosed with gender dysphoria by transgender health expert Dr. Jason Rafferty. According to the lawsuit, he determined she “would benefit from being put on cross-sex hormones” in a single visit that lasted less than an hour.

After two appointments, Ayala says, she was administering her own testosterone treatment.Independent Women's Forum

The AAP did not respond to requests for comment.

Ayala alleges that her previous diagnoses of autism, ADHD and PTSD were largely overlooked by her healthcare providers.

The lawsuit claims her doctors “falsely represented that cross-sex hormone therapy was the only treatment option available to Isabelle to effectively treat her gender dysphoria, as well as her anxiety, depression, PTSD and suicidality.”

Less than a year into treatment, Ayala said, she actually did attempt suicide.

“She was a guinea pig under one of the top experts in this field of so-called gender medicine,” Bolar said. “She was hitting rock bottom, and he continued to put her down this experimental path of medicine.”

Independent Women’s Forum director of storytelling Kelsey Bolar is the executive producer of a documentary about Ayala’s case.courtesy of Kelsey Bolar

By age 17, in 2020, Ayala felt the urge to begin presenting femininely again. A YouTuber who had detransitioned inspired her to identify as a woman again — and she soon realized her transition had been a massive mistake.

Three years on, according to the lawsuit, she still struggles with unwanted body hair, vaginal atrophy and an altered bone structure from the testosterone.

“She has since contracted Hashimotos’s disease, an autoimmune disease that only the males in her family have a history of, from taking testosterone,” the suit claims.

Ayala began her detransition process in 2020.Independent Women's Forum

Ayala filed her lawsuit in October, naming seven doctors and 15 John Does she accuses of “civil conspiracy, fraud and medical malpractice.” Among the physicians named is Dr. Jason Rafferty, the doctor who she alleges prescribed her testosterone on her first visit.

“There was zero mental health diagnosis, zero psycho behavioral diagnosis, nothing other than simply taking Isabelle’s word for what she needed,” Ayala’s lawyer, Jordan Campbell, alleged to The Post.

Dr. Rafferty is the chair of the American Academy of Pediatrics’s LGBTQ+ Health and Wellness Committee. While treating Ayala, the suit alleges he was actively authoring the AAP’s guidance on gender affirming care.

The guidance, which was published a year later in 2018, is touted as a standard of care for physicians treating trans youth across the country.

Alaya is suing the American Academy of Pediatrics.Eve Switzer

Ayala — who claims she was the “guinea pig” of Rafferty’s developing guidance — has also sued the AAP for underplaying the risks of treatment.

“Because of Isabelle’s unique fact pattern in terms of being treated by Dr. Rafferty while he was drafting this statement, we’ve sued the AAP itself for a civil conspiracy,” Campbell explained.

Although other detransitioners have sued medical providers, Ayala’s case is the first to target the AAP directly. The Academy did not respond to The Post’s request for comment.

Ayala is seeking compensatory and punitive damages as, she alleges, she continues to suffer the medical consequences of her transition.

Attorney Jordan Campbell is representing Ayala in her lawsuit.Independent Women's Forum

“It’s really mostly just been doctor’s appointments and pain management for me right now, which is not great because we have bills to pay,” she said. “My mom’s working very hard to try and keep us afloat, but there’s not much I can do physically.”

Ayala’s documentary is the eleventh in the IWF’s “Identity Crisis” series.

“There was one point where I was really depressed over my situation, especially when I couldn’t do anything about it,” she said. “But I’m a lot more hopeful now.”

https://nypost.com/2023/12/13/news/detransitioner-suing-american-academy-of-pediatrics/

Biden goalpost moves (again) to Joe not ‘FINANCIALLY’ involved in Hunter’s sleaze

Hunter Biden just moved the goalpost again on the central question of his dad’s role in his global influence-peddling business: Joe, he now says, wasn’t “financially involved.”

This, when President Biden himself has shifted from claiming he “never discussed” and had “never spoken to” Hunter about his dealings to insisting he wasn’t “involved” in his son’s business.

And now, apparently, we’re down to “not financially involved.”

Which means what, exactly? Is this an admission that, yes, he did gladhand at dinners and get on the phone to help Hunter sell his proximity to power? That no Hunter client ever paid Joe directly?

Plus: Should it matter that Hunter acted as outraged in making this modified, limited denial as Joe did in telling the previous, now-abandoned lies?

Hunter drew the new line while posturing in lieu of showing up for a closed-door deposition; he says he’ll only give sworn testimony at one of those on-camera House hearings that consist mostly of politicians letting witnesses off the hook by vying for every possible “Me! Me!” second on-screen.

That is, he wants to give as little evidence as possible.

Thing is, the evidence is already beyond damning: Testimony from Tony Bobulinski and Devon Archer — bolstered by photos and other records — shows that Joe met in person or on the phone with dozens of Hunter “clients.”

Bank records show that overseas cash flowed (via a host of dummy corporations) to most of the Biden family — which actually does count as a legal benefit to the family’s head.

Plus some payments then went on to Joe himself, with the checks marked as “loan repayments” but with no sign yet of any actual loans.

Archer swears his entire business with Hunter centered on selling the Biden brand; Bobulinksi confirms that the “Big Guy” who was to get 10% of a huge China deal was indeed Joe.

And it seems the Obama administration didn’t want Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin fired back when then-Veep Joe demanded it, saying millions in US aid was on the line — but Hunter’s Burisma paymasters wanted Shokin gone because he was investigating them.

(Not to mention all the evidence, especially from IRS whistleblowers, that Justice Department Democrats have spent years frustrating the Hunter investigationespecially any line that might implicate Joe.)

What were once blanket denials are now full of holes; at this rate the only excuse is the end will be a claim that the House shouldn’t impeach a sitting president just because he abused the office of vice president to enrich his entire clan.

Seriously: That’s where all the goal-post moves are headed.

https://nypost.com/2023/12/13/opinion/the-biden-goalpost-moves-again-to-joe-not-financially-involved-in-hunters-sleaze/

Nasdaq hit by system error affecting stock orders

Exchange operator Nasdaq was hit by a system error on Wednesday that impacted stock orders and led to some being canceled.

The incident first started at 2:41 pm ET (1440 GMT) on Dec. 13, 2023 which involved "FIX/RASH ports, according to the Nasdaq website.

"Some customers have seen inaccuracies and delays in the delivery of execution reports. We are working to reach a prompt resolution to deliver the correct execution reports. FIX/RASH was closed down for the rest of the day. The closing cross was completed and all other markets are operating normally," the exchange operator said in a statement.

"Customers may be seeing mismatches on executions."

NASDAQ said it will continue to investigate the earlier system issues with FIX/RASH, and send an update once there is a resolution.

The stock exchange did not respond to Reuters' query on what caused the system error.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/1-nasdaq-hit-system-error-011014146.html

Saudi registrants for COP28 included undeclared oil company employees, nonprofit says

 At least 15 people who registered for Saudi Arabia's delegation to the COP28 climate conference in Dubai appear to be undeclared employees of the Saudi state oil company, according to research by an environmental nonprofit.

Saudi Arabia, the world's second-biggest oil producer, was one of the main countries opposing an aggressive commitment to phase out fossil fuels at the United Nations-led summit. Saudi Arabia and other large oil-producing nations have traditionally held sway in nixing potential agreements on reducing oil, gas and coal, which when burned cause climate change.

This year, however, negotiators went into extra time before approving an agreement that calls for a transition away from fossil fuels for the first time, though critics say it is filled with loopholes.

New rules for this year's talks required registrants to disclose their affiliation, a move aimed at improving transparency. Activists have long questioned the presence of fossil fuel producers at the talks, although the companies and many experts have said it makes sense for them to participate given their role in the emissions that cause climate change.

Global Witness reported that at least 14 members of the Saudi delegation had names that matched employees of the state oil company, Saudi Aramco. The Associated Press independently verified the nonprofit's work. Two more registrants declared elsewhere -- but not in their conference registration -- an affiliation to Aramco. One of those was a board member.

AP earlier reported that at least 1,300 employees of organizations representing fossil fuel interests registered to attend this year’s talks. Aramco had not declared any delegates to this year’s conference, according to the AP research.

Aramco declined comment to AP. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which oversees the conference, did not respond to a request for comment.

Aramco gets some 99% of its revenues from fossil fuels, according to research by the nonprofit Urgewald. It’s not clear what role the apparent Aramco employees would have played within the Saudi delegation.

The UNFCCC secretariat asked delegates this year to declare their employer, as well as their relationship to the delegation they are guests of. It said participants could opt out of declaring the relationship but made no mention of opting out of declaring an affiliation.

The Global Witness count would make Aramco one of the larger fossil fuel companies to have registered attendance. Russian state-owned Gazprom, the world’s second-leading producer of oil and gas, declared at least 16 employees as attendees at this year’s climate conference.

Aramco employees on the Global Witness list included CEO Amin Nasser, senior vice president Fahad Al-Dhubaib and director of international affairs Nesa Subrahmaniyan.

“The world’s largest oil company snuck executives into COP28 without disclosing their interest,” Jonathan Noronha-Gant, senior campaigner at Global Witness, said. “We need to rid COPs of oil industry influence.”

Global Witness said it reviewed the 136 Saudi registrants who said they were affiliated to the country’s Ministry of Energy, to look for names of people employed by Aramco. Saudi Arabia’s total delegation has 478 people; the nonprofit did not review the entire delegation.

COP24, held in 2018, was the last year Aramco disclosed in the UN attendance rolls that it had sent staff.

Saudi Arabia hailed the deal announced Wednesday as a success. The country did not respond to requests for a comment.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/SAUDI-ARABIAN-OIL-COMPANY-103505448/news/Saudi-registrants-for-COP28-included-undeclared-oil-company-employees-nonprofit-says-45562379/

Vir to Reduce Operating Expenses and Focus Areas with Highest Potential for Value Creation

 Reinforcing strategic focus on chronic hepatitis delta and chronic hepatitis B clinical programs and antibody platform to target infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, and oncology –

– Reducing workforce by approximately 12% and consolidating geographic footprint –

– Anticipate annual savings of at least $40 million from cost optimization efforts –

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20231213396441/en/