Search This Blog

Friday, February 2, 2024

Inside The Most Ridiculous Jobs Report In Recent History

 On the surface, it was an blockbuster jobs report, certainly one which nobody expected. Starting at the top, the BLS reported that in January the US unexpectedly added 353K "jobs" - the most since January 2023 (when the print was 482K compared to 131K) , double the consensus forecast of 185K and more than the highest Wall Street estimate (300K from Natixis). In fact, this was a 4-sigma beat to estimate, unheard of in the past year.

The headline data was stellar across the board, starting with the unemployment rate which once again failed to rise - denying expectations from "Sahm's Rule" that a recession may have already started - all the way to average hourly earnings, which unexpectedly spiked from 4.1% (pre-revision) to 4.5%, the highest since last September, and a slap in the face to the Fed's disinflation narrative...

... or it would be if one didn't think of checking how the average rose: well, it turns out that, since average hourly earnings is a fraction, it did not rise due to a jump in actual wages but - since it is earnings over a period of time - "rose" because the BLS decided to sharply slash the number of estimated hours that everyone was working, from 34.3 to just 34.1, which may not sound like a lot until one realizes that the last time the workweek was this low was when the economy was shut down during covid.  Excluding the covid lockdowns, one would have to go back to 2010 to find a workweek that was this anemic.

And speaking of revisions, we had a lot of those: in January, the BLS conducted its annual "annual re-benchmarking and update of seasonal adjustment factors." Long story short, what was until December a decline in jobs has now been miraculously transformed into gains, as shown in the chart below.

For those asking, the revisions were unambiguously designed to give the impression that the labor market is slowing much less than it is. Consider this: before the revision, the average monthly job gain in 2021 was largely unchanged (606K pre-revision vs 604K post), and while the average monthly gain in 2022 was revised lower (from 399K to 377K), this was purposefully goalseeked to make 2023 appear stronger, and indeed the average monthly increase in 2023 has been revised from 225K to 255K.

Which would be great, if only it wasn't almost entirely due to the BLS's latest choice of seasonal adjustments, which have gone from merely laughable to full clownshow, as the following comparison between the revised BLS Payrolls number and the ADP payrolls show: the trend is clear: the Biden admin numbers are now clearly rising even as the impartial ADP (which directly logs employment numbers at the company level and is actually far more accurate), shows an accelerating slowdown.

And speaking of seasonal adjustments, the January print was all seasonals, because while the seasonally adjusted payrolls was up 353K, the unadjusted was down 2.635 million, a 3 million jobs delta.

In other words, just a 10% error rate in the seasonal adjustment (roughly where it falls) would wipe out the entire gain and make January increase a decline. Then again, this is the case with every January jobs report, because as shown below, the actual change in jobs in the first month of the year is down anywhere between 2.5 million and 3 million!

But it's more than just the Biden admin hanging its "success" on seasonal adjustments: when one digs deeper inside the jobs report, all sorts of ugly things emerge... such as the latest divergence between the Establishment (payrolls) and much more accurate Household (actual employment) survey. To wit, while in January the BLS claims 353K payrolls were added, the Household survey found that the number of actually employed workers dropped again, this time by 31K (from 161.183K to 161.152K).

This means that while the Payrolls series hits new all time highs every month since December 2020 (when according to the BLS the US had its last month of payrolls losses), the level of Employment has barely budged in the past year. Worse, as shown in the chart below, such a gaping divergence has opened between the two series in the past 4 years, that the number of Employed workers would need to soar by 9 million (!) to catch up to what Payrolls claims is the employment situation.

There's more: shifting from a quantitative to a qualitative assessment, reveals just how ugly the composition of "new jobs" has been. Consider this: the BLS reports that in January 2024, the US had 133.1 million full-time jobs and 27.9 million part-time jobs. Well, that's great... until you look back one year and find that in February 2023 the US had 133.2 million full-time jobs, or more than it does one year later! And yes, all the job growth since then has been in part-time jobs, which have increased by 870K since February 2023 (from 27.020 million to 27.890 million).

Here is a summary of the labor composition in the past year: all the jobs have been part-time jobs!

But wait there's even more, because just as we enter the peak of election season and political talking points will be thrown around left and right, especially in the context of the immigration crisis created intentionally by the Biden administration which is hoping to import millions of new Democratic voters (maybe the US can hold the presidential election in Honduras or Guatemala, after all it is their citizens that will be illegally casting the key votes in November), what we find is that in January, the number of native-born worker tumbled again, sliding by a massive 560K to just 129.807 million. Add to this the December data, and we get a near-record 1.9 million plunge in native-born workers in just the past 2 months!

Said otherwise, not only has all job creation in the past 4 years has been exclusively for foreign-born workers, but there has been zero job-creation for native born workers since July 2018!

Source: St Louis Fed FRED Native Born and Foreign Born

This is a huge issue - especially at a time of an illegal alien flood at the border - and is about to become a huge political scandal, because once the inevitable recession finally hits, there will be millions of furious unemployed Americans demanding a more accurate explanation for what happened - i.e., the illegal immigration floodgates that were opened by the Biden admin.

Which is also why the Biden admin will do everything in his power to insure there is no official recession before November... and is why after the election is over, all economic hell will finally break loose. Until then, however, expect the jobs numbers to get more and more ridiculous.

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/inside-most-ridiculous-jobs-report-recent-history

Intelligent Bio Solutions Prelim Revenue

 Intelligent Bio Solutions Inc. (Nasdaq: INBS) ("INBS" or the "Company"), a medical technology company delivering intelligent, rapid, non-invasive testing solutions, today announced preliminary unaudited revenue results for fiscal Second Quarter and six months ended December 31, 2023. The Company expects approximate unaudited revenue of $1.56 million for the six months ended December 31, 2023, representing a significant increase of 337% compared to the same period the prior year, and approximate unaudited revenue of $0.76 million for the second fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2023, representing an increase of 114% compared to the same period the prior year.

INBS further expects a 30% rise in cartridge sales and a 91% rise in reader sales for the six months ended December 31, 2023, compared to the six months ended December 31, 2022.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/02/02/2822845/0/en/Intelligent-Bio-Solutions-Inc-Announces-Preliminary-Unaudited-Fiscal-Second-Quarter-and-Six-Month-Revenue-Results.html

Revance Receives Permanent J-Code for DAXXIFY

 CMS streamlines reimbursement for DAXXIFY with assignment of permanent J-code -

- Peer-reviewed publication of DAXXIFY pivotal data in therapeutics reinforces the products long duration of effect and favorable safety profile -

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/revance-receives-permanent-j-code-130000370.html

CMS Sends Initial Medicare Drug Price Proposals to Companies

 The Department of Health and Human Services announced Thursday that it sent initial proposals to pharma companies, kicking off a months-long process to settle on a maximum fair price for the 10 drugs selected for negotiations under the Inflation Reduction Act.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is conducting these negotiations and participating drugmakers have 30 days to either signify that they agree with the proposed pricing or submit a counteroffer.

At a JPM Week event last month, life sciences lobbying group Incubate predicted that all 10 companies would challenge CMS’s initial offer, particularly as the Biden administration is expected to make “draconian” price cuts amid the political pressure of the presidential election year.

Analysts agreed this week, telling Reuters that they expect that CMS would propose steep discounts in their initial offer, ranging from a statutory price cut minimum of 25% and reaching as high as 60%.

Negotiations will take place through the spring and summer and are scheduled to end on Aug. 1, according to a CMS fact sheet. The agency has until Sept. 1 to publish the final negotiated maximum fair prices for the 10 selected drugs, which will then take effect in 2026.

“Allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices is just one tool we’re using to lower prices thanks to the President’s lower cost prescription drug law,” HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement. “From capping insulin at $35 per month, to making drug companies pay a rebate for raising their prices faster than inflation, to capping out of pocket costs in Part D, we are delivering on that day-one promise.”

However, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) on Thursday said CMS’s initial price-setting “offer” to companies was an effort to “win political points on the campaign trail.” PhRMA also criticized the negotiations process for its lack of transparency and “operating behind closed doors to set medicine prices without disclosing for months how they arrived at the price or how much patient and provider input was used.”

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was signed into law in August 2022, as part of the Biden administration’s effort to generate some $25 billion in drug cost savings annually by 2031. To help achieve this goal, the IRA allows CMS to negotiate prices for some of the most widely prescribed medicines.

The first 10 drugs that would be impacted by these negotiations were named in August 2023 and include BMS’s Eliquis (apixaban), Novartis’ Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan), Amgen’s Enbrel (etanercept), Lilly’s Jardiance (empagliflozin), AstraZeneca’s Farxiga (dapagliflozin), Merck’s Januvia (sitagliptin), Novo Nordisk’s insulin products Fiasp and Novolog and J&J’s Xarelto (rivaroxaban), Imbruvica (ibrutinib) and Stelara (ustekinumab).

HHS on Thursday also released data from several reports showing the disparity in drug prices between the U.S. and other countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

The findings show that in 2022 prices across all drugs in the U.S. were nearly three times as high as prices in 33 OECD countries, with American consumers paying $2.78 per dollar paid in those other countries for medicines. The gap is even larger for insulin, which was nearly 10 times more expensive in the U.S. than in the 33 countries.

https://www.biospace.com/article/cms-sends-initial-medicare-drug-price-proposals-to-companies-as-negotiations-kick-off/

Migrants Who Beat NYPD Cops Released With No Bail, Given Free Tickets To California Under Fake Names

 Four out of five illegal migrants who were caught on camera attacking two NYPD cops in Times Square were arrested, set free on no bail, and then given free bus tickets to California.

Following their release, a smirking Johan Boada, 22, could be seen giving a double middle finger to media covering the situation.

Jhoan Boada leaves Manhattan Criminal Court without bail on Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2024 in Manhattan, New York. (Barry Williams for New York Daily News)

When asked if he should be deported, Gov. Kathy Hochul said: "I think that’s actually something that should be looked at," adding "I mean, if someone commits a crime against a police officer in the state of New York and they’re not here legally, it’s definitely worth checking into."

"These are law enforcement officers who should never under any circumstances be subjected to physical assault," Hochul added. "It’s wrong on all accounts and I’m looking to judges and prosecutors to do the right thing."

Mayor Eric Adams suggested that lawmakers need to "reexamine" laws that prevent deportation.

"Those migrants who are here because they want to be part of the American dream, we say ‘Yes’ to that," said Adams. "But those who are breaking our laws, we need to reexamine the laws that don’t allow us to deport them because they are doing violent acts. We cannot create an atmosphere where you’re going to bring violence in our city," the NY Post reports.

Now, the NYPD is looking for the men...

...however the Post is now reporting that "Cops believe the group hopped on a bus bound for California on Wednesday after giving phony names to a church-affiliated nonprofit group that helps migrants get rides out of the city." 

Interesting to see what it takes to motivate city officials to act...