Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 6, 2024

Ronna Out: RNC Chairwoman Plans To Step Down After Presiding Over 'Party Of Losers'

 After years of criticism and a public spat with Vivek Ramaswamy, who said Republicans under her watch have become a "party of losers," RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel is stepping down

According to the NY Times, which required four journalists, McDaniel has told former President Donald Trump that she'll quit shortly after the South Carolina primary on Feb. 24, according to two people familiar with the plans (ah yes, 'people familiar').

In her place, Trump is expected to promote Michael Whatley, chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party - after which an election will take place.

McDaniel, the longest-serving chair since the 19th century, came under fire in January of 2023 after Republicans had terrible results going back to 2018.

"We’ve had three substandard election cycles in a row: ‘18, ’20, and ’22," Florida Governor DeSantis told TPUSA founder Charlie Kirk in an interview. "Given the political environment of a very unpopular president in Biden, huge majorities of the people think the country is going in the wrong direction—that is an environment that’s tailor-made to make big gains in the House and the Senate and in state houses all across the country, and yet that didn’t happen."

McDaniel also took barbs from attorney and GOP committee member Harmeet Dhillon, McDaniel's primary challenger in the Jan. 2023 election for chair, telling Fox News: "But you know, at the end of the day, like I said, this isn't school. You don't get a gold star forever. You don't get to stay in your job forever. If you continuously under perform what you promised your clients, they don't hire you the next time around."

In November, after the GOP lost several races that should have been layups, more people called for Ronna's head.

"What, exactly, does Ronna McDaniel do, besides lose?" asked former Trump administration official Monica Crowley on X. "The only thing she SHOULD do is RESIGN. Effective immediately."

 "FIRE RINO RONNA MCDANIEL NOW!" tweeted Florida congressional candidate Anthony Sabatini, an Army veteran, adding "Ronna McDaniel will go down as the worst RNC Chair in history."

McDaniel has also come under fire for picking NBC to host a November GOP debate - during which former 2024 presidential contender Vivek Ramaswamy suggested she come up on stage and quit during said debate, as the GOP has become a "party of losers" under her watch.

"...there is a cancer in the Republican establishment... Since Ronna McDaniel took over as chairwoman of the RNC in 2017 we have lost 2018, 2020, 2022, no red wave, that never came."

And then the haymaker...

"We got trounced last night in 2023 and I think that we have to have accountability in our party," he went on.

"For that matter, Ronna if you want to come up on stage tonight. You want to look the GOP voters in the eye and tell them you resign... I will turn over my time to you."

It took four months, but here we are

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ronna-out-rnc-chairwoman-plans-step-down-after-presiding-over-party-losers

Here’s When the Fed Will Cut

 When will the Fed cut rates? Before giving you the answer, let’s back up.

Before last week’s Federal Reserve meeting, I offered readers the following forecast of what would happen at that meeting:

On Wednesday, the Fed will leave its target rate for fed funds unchanged. That decision will keep the federal funds target at 5.50% as set at the July 26, 2023 meeting. Over the course of fifteen FOMC meetings beginning March 16, 2022, I’ve been correct in all my forecasts including the “skipped” rate hikes at the June, September, November, and December 2023 meetings. I’m confident I’ll be correct on Wednesday also.

The Fed did keep the fed funds rate unchanged as I projected. That makes 16 Fed meetings in a row going back to March 16, 2022, when I got the Fed forecast right. Events remain uncertain from here, but it’s so far, so good for my forecasting.

Here’s the text of part of the Fed’s press release issued last Wednesday:

The committee seeks to achieve maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2% over the longer run. In support of these goals, the committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 5.25–5.50%. The committee will continue to assess additional information and its implications for monetary policy.

In determining the extent of additional policy firming that may be appropriate to return inflation to 2% over time, the committee will take into account the cumulative tightening of monetary policy, the lags with which monetary policy affects economic activity and inflation, and economic and financial developments.

In addition, the committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities, as described in its previously announced plans. The committee is strongly committed to returning inflation to its 2% objective.

No Typical Fed-Speak

If that press release sounds like bland Fed-speak, it’s not. It’s actually one of the most dramatic announcements the Fed has made in quite some time.

Of course, they did not cut rates, but they offered enormous insight in terms of when they might cut rates and even left open the option that they might raise rates.

This was all a bit of an earthquake relative to market expectations, which is why stocks quickly retreated after the announcement. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 0.82%, the S&P 500 fell 1.61% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 2.23%.

Wall Street was priced for the “pivot” to lower rates in March. What they got was a bucket of ice water thrown in their faces.

The key phrase was “The committee does not expect it will be appropriate to reduce the target ranges until it has gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2%.”

Translating from the double negative to plain English, the Fed said it does not have such confidence today that inflation is contained. Powell made this explicit in his press conference. He said, “We want to see more good data.”

In fact, Powell was like a broken record about the Fed needing to see more evidence that inflation really is under control. He said rate cuts will not happen, “Until we have gained greater confidence that inflation is moving steadily toward our goal of 2%.”

He then said, “We just need to see more evidence that confirms what we’re seeing… and gives us confidence.” He topped this off by repeating, “It will be appropriate to reduce rates… but we need to be confident that inflation is coming down sustainably to 2%.”

What Comes Next

OK, Jay. We get it. Rates are not coming down until you see several months of data that show inflation coming down and staying down. Sounds familiar. In my pre-meeting report last week, I made the same point. Here’s what I said about inflation:

The reasons for the Fed sitting tight and not cutting rates (the infamous “pivot” that Wall Street has been wrong about for almost two years) is that the Fed is losing the battle against inflation.

When inflation (measured monthly by CPI on a year-over-year basis) dropped from 9.1% in June 2022 to 3.0% in June 2023, the Fed was ready to declare victory. The Fed’s goal was still 2% annualized inflation, but progress from 9.1% to 3.0% was so dramatic that 2.0% seemed well within reach. It was around that time (July 2023) that the Fed hit the pause button on further rate hikes.

Since then, the news has been uniformly bad for the Fed. Inflation jumped up to 3.2% in July 2023, and then spiked to 3.7% in August 2023. That new higher level at 3.7% was maintained in September. Inflation retreated a bit to 3.2% in October and 3.1% in November, but those results were still higher than the 3.0% last June when the Fed declared victory. December presented another nasty surprise. Inflation rose again, this time to 3.4%, which produced an average for the full year 2023 of 4.1%. In short, not only is inflation not coming down, it has moved up since June and is holding those higher levels.

In other words, Powell saw what we saw. Inflation has come down but not far enough. Lately, inflation has actually been going up and may rise higher because of oil prices. The Fed is nowhere near to rate cuts and Powell effectively said that.

Powell Telegraphs His Intentions

Powell also did something he never does. He gave a detailed forecast about what the Fed will do at the next meeting on March 19–20, 2024. He said, “I don’t think it’s likely that the committee will reach a level of confidence to reduce rates at the March meeting.”

There you have it. Wall Street can forget about rate cuts until at least the May 1, 2024, meeting and probably longer if higher oil prices have the lagged effect on consumer prices that I expect.

The Wall Street pivot cheerleaders have been chasing the rate cut chimera for almost two years and they’ve been consistently wrong (but it is a good narrative for selling stocks and pumping up stock prices). They’ll just have to keep up the happy talk for a while longer.

To be clear, my expectation is that Powell and the Fed will cut rates by midyear, possibly at the June or July FOMC meeting.

But this rate cut will not be based on a soft landing or Goldilocks narrative. It will be based on the view that the economy will slip into recession and disinflation and even deflation will be dominant.

The cut (when it comes) will be required by unpleasant economic conditions.

Powell will not be swayed by politics. There is no secret plan to help Biden with rate cuts. Nevertheless, a rate cut will still be cheered by Democrats while Republicans will accuse Powell of favoring Biden. That won’t be fair, but it will be the perception.

Meanwhile, rates will stay where they are, QT will continue, monetary policy still tilts toward tightening (because of QT) and stocks will take a breather until the pivot crowd gets more clarity. When the rate cuts come, it will be a case of be careful what you wish for.

Rate cuts in a recession will be awful for stocks. There is no such thing as a soft landing.

The next Fed meeting is March 19–20. A lot will happen between now and then including more data on inflation, unemployment and economic growth that will affect the Fed’s decision-making process.

I’ll be watching all of it carefully and bringing you the latest analysis as events unfold.

James G. Rickards is the editor of Strategic IntelligenceProject ProphesyCrash Speculator, and Gold Speculator. He is an American lawyer, economist, and investment banker with 40 years of experience working in capital markets on Wall Street. He was the principal negotiator of the rescue of Long-Term Capital Management L.P. (LTCM) by the U.S Federal Reserve in 1998. His clients include institutional investors and government directorates. 

https://dailyreckoning.com/heres-when-the-fed-will-cut/

New York Community Bancorp Cut To 'Junk' By Moody's: 33% Of Deposits Uninsured

 Having seen the share price collapse to its lowest since 1997, following the regional lender's reporting of a surprising (and large) loss for Q4 and slashing its dividend (to 5c vs 17c exp), ratings agency Moody's has cut all long-term and some short-term ratings of New York Community Bancorp to 'junk' (Ba2 from Baa3).

NYCB is extending losses to a $3 handle after the downgrade...

Kristi Noem: "Somebody's Running The White House. I Don't Believe It's Joe Biden"

 by Aaron Pan via The Epoch Times,

South Dakota governor Kristi Noem said President Joe Biden is not running the White House, but someone else is governing the country as she raised concerns over the border crisis that is “an extreme remaking of America.”

During an interview on Fox News on Feb. 4, when asked by host Maria Bartiromo why President Biden is providing free housing and health care to illegal immigrants, Ms. Noem said,

“He’s weak. Somebody’s running the White House. I don’t believe it’s Joe Biden. He’s never been this extreme. This is an extreme remaking of America.”

“It is a socialist-communist agenda. I think that they’ve so infiltrated the Democrat party that it’s no longer the Democrat Party of 20 years ago; it’s now a socialist party that does not want a strong America,” she added.

Ms. Noem is one of over a dozen GOP governors who have visited Texas to show their support for Gov. Greg Abbott in his fight with the Biden administration over the influx of illegal immigrants crossing the border in Eagle Pass.

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) estimated throughout the 2023 fiscal year, 2.4 million people illegally crossed the border, up from 2.3 million the previous year. In contrast, between Oct. 1, 2019, to Sept. 30, 2020, before President Biden took office, there were only 458,000 encounters with illegal immigrants by border patrol agents.

In the interview, South Dakota’s governor criticized the Biden administration for the border crisis. “We see the president undermining our country by allowing this invasion at the southern border, and it’s destabilizing our country,” she said.

For weeks, the Biden administration has clashed with Mr. Abbott after the National Guard took control of the 47-acre Shelby Park area in Eagle Pass, Texas, to stop the flood of illegal border crossings.

The Texas National Guard has been accused of denying Border Patrol agents access to the park, leading to multiple legal battles. The Texas state government has cited its constitutional right to exercise its authority to protect the borders.

Ms. Noem has previously sent South Dakota National Guard troops three times to support Texas border control efforts. Last month, she indicated that she would continue to deploy her state’s troops to the border.

Ms. Noem’s border visit comes after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last month that the federal government could remove razor wire and other barriers the Texas state government had placed along the border with Mexico to deter illegal crossings.

Despite the Supreme Court ruling, Mr. Abbott has ordered even more razor wire barriers to be installed. Numerous Republican political leaders, in turn, have voiced their support for the Texas governor’s efforts. Ms. Noem was one of 25 Republican governors who signed a letter voicing support for the Texas governor after the U.S. Supreme Court ruling.

In the interview with host Maria Bartiromo, she explained, “The reason that the federal government went after Texas was because they'd actually figured out a way to put up the razor wire that was impenetrable that people could not get through. They said even those able-bodied military-aged men could not get through the barrier at that point. And it was so effective that that’s when the federal government came after Texas to take it down.”

The South Dakota governor accused Democrats and President Biden of abusing their power by seeking to federalize the National Guard. She stated that she would defend her authority and even warned of a potential war.

“Democrats have been encouraging this president. They’ve been encouraging President Biden to come after our state’s rights. They’ve been talking about federalizing our National Guard, which would be the first time in American history that we would have a president that would pay soldiers to stand down, to actually not protect America,” she noted.

“If he’s willing to do that and to take away my authority as governor, as commander in chief of those National Guard, boy, we do have a war on our hands,” she warned.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/kristi-noem-somebodys-running-white-house-i-dont-believe-its-joe-biden

4D Molecular Phase 2 Data Met Investor Expectations, BMO Boosts Forecast

 4D Molecular Therapeutics 

+ Free Alerts
 released interim data from the Phase 2 PRISM clinical trial evaluating intravitreal 4D-150 in wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD) patients. 

A single intravitreal dose of 4D-150 demonstrated favorable safety results through the data cutoff date.

BMO Capital Markets says the 4D-150 Phase 2 results met investor expectations. 

In the foreseeable future, 4D Molecular Therapeutics’ gene therapy platform, along with the management’s track record of success, is anticipated to achieve success in treating various medical conditions such as diabetic macular edema, geographic atrophy, cystic fibrosis, and Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, mirroring the accomplishments seen in wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Short to medium-term prospects include potential announcements related to data, partnerships, and regulatory developments in 2024, presenting opportunities for significant gains. 

The probability of success for the wet AMD program has been reassessed. Hence, BMO Capital analyst Kostas Biliouris increased the target price to $70 from $50

The analyst says 4D Molecular Therapeutics remains rated as Outperform and is their top pick for the first half 2024.

BMO Capital is optimistic about the Phase 2 data, viewing it as highly robust regarding safety and efficacy. The consistency in the central subfield thickness of the high-dose 4D-150 arm, without fluctuations seen in Regeneron Pharmaceutical Inc’s 

Get Free Report
 Eylea arm, is a particularly encouraging observation. This suggests a powerful and lasting impact on the disease.

The management is actively exploring partnerships for 4D-150 development and commercialization outside the U.S. The rapid enrollment observed in the ongoing 4D-150 trials, combined with the absence of a 15-letter loss requirement prior to rescue in Phase 3 (unlike TKI Phase 3 trials), allows anticipation of swift patient recruitment, thereby accelerating the overall development timeline.

https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/24/02/36963715/4d-molecular-therapeutics-4d-150-phase-2-data-met-investor-expectations-analyst-boo

Axsome started at Buy by UBS

 Target $111

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=AXSM&p=d