Search This Blog

Monday, August 4, 2025

US farm agency allows six more states to bar some items from SNAP food aid

 The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Monday allowed six additional states to bar participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program from using their benefits to buy certain processed foods, such as sodas and candy.

The SNAP waivers for West Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas amend the statutory definition of food for purchase and put an end to the subsidization of popular types of junk food beginning in 2026.

The administration of President Donald Trump has encouraged all states to take such measures as part of its "Make America Healthy Again" initiative, named for the social movement led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The USDA had so far signed waivers to allow six states — Arkansas, Idaho, Utah, Iowa, Indiana and Nebraska — to place similar purchasing restrictions on SNAP recipients.

"I hope to see all 50 states join this bold commonsense approach. For too long, the root causes of our chronic disease epidemic have been addressed with lip service only," said the U.S. Food and Drug Commissioner Marty Makary.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced the additional waivers at an event at the USDA headquarters in Washington.

"These state waivers promote healthier options for families in need," said Secretary Rollins.

More than 42 million people receive SNAP benefits, sometimes called food stamps, as part of the nation's largest anti-hunger program.

The massive tax cut and spending bill signed by President Trump in July makes significant changes to the SNAP program, including expanding work requirements and shifting more spending for the program to states.

https://www.aol.com/news/us-farm-agency-allows-six-214926575.html

BLS had big problems with data manipulation, 2024 internal report shows

 


Days after President Trump fired Bureau of Labor Statistics chief Erika McEntarfer, a Biden appointee who repeatedly released bad data on jobs creation with big revisions afterward, the establishment left continues to howl about President Trump.

It's like they like bad data.

Here's Larry Summers making the television rounds, defending the indefensible:

Now writer Don Surber has discovered a doozy of a BLS internal report from 2024, reported by Bloomberg News, that the agency has been mismanaging data up the wazoo.

 According to Bloomberg

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics is “not sufficiently focused” on how it disseminates key economic data and a revamp of the agency’s culture is required, according to a report commissioned after a series of botched releases.

The Labor Department, which oversees the BLS, ordered the independent review to examine “procedures and practices for the equitable and timely provision of data to the public.” The findings of the 60-day external review were published Tuesday and included a number of recommendations to improve processes and communications.

“We have already begun the work of turning the team’s recommendations into a roadmap to recommit our agency to data security and equitable access to data,” BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer said on a call Tuesday.

Well, she didn't.

This corresponds pretty well to the problems President Trump cited on the day he gave her the boot:

Trump fires BLS commissioner, Erika McEntarfer pic.twitter.com/5opgVmP7iQ

— zerohedge (@zerohedge) August 1, 2025

Note that he didn't object to the data itself, as Summers and his buddies claimed; he objected to the constant revisions of the data, big, unprecedented revisions, released at politically sensitive times, always good for the Democrats and always bad for the Republicans, pretty well nullifying the purpose of collecting data at all. 

She also said she'd have the problems under control -- and she didn't, so out she went.

The Bloomberg report is more disturbing than just major revisions of data that Trump cited.

Deep in the Bloomberg story, there are doings like this:

The report was commissioned after several incidents around data releases raised questions about how some of the world’s most sensitive economic information gets disseminated. In August, the BLS provided at least three Wall Street firms with highly anticipated figures on revisions to US payrolls — all while the official release was delayed on its website.

The episode not only sparked outrage among investors but also on Capitol Hill, where key Senate Republicans charged the BLS with its “continued failures” in producing crucial economic data and demanded answers to questions around its data release protocols.

Other incidents earlier in the year raised similar concerns. In May, the BLS inadvertently published inflation data a half hour before the scheduled release time, and separately a BLS economist disclosed internal data to an exclusive group of analysts he described as “super users.”

BLS claimed innocent human error around these releases of data to insiders first instead of everyone, but nobody believes that. Billions of dollars of trades are on the line and equal access to data is ingrained in every player, government and traders alike, ever since the dawn of Wall Street. Any uneven release of data is inside trading, and release of data to privileged cronies over others is politicization of data. 

Which is where Trump had the problem. The woman promised to reform her data mishandling, which stretches way back, and she went right back to business as usual, manipulating the data for political purposes in a variety of ways.

Economics powerhouse Alan Reynolds found these problems, too:

It's possible she turned to erratic, revised, and made-up releases in response to no longer being able to release data to cronies. Maybe that was a substitute of sorts. It would be interesting to know if her net worth has grown suddenly as it does for many on Capitol Hill.

The bottom line is that Trump saw right through it. He put a stop to it. Now maybe the markets can function again as they are supposed to.

Thank you, President Trump.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/08/bls_manipulated_data_for_years_2024_internal_report_shows.html

Oklahoma plans to save itself from a California invasion

 


Affluent Democrats have a pattern: They despoil a state with their policies and then, surveying the ruins around them (usually unaffordable housing and high crime), they move on to a safe, affordable Republican enclave. However, having failed to recognize that they were responsible for the destruction of their former home, they use their growing political heft to repeat the same policies in their new location. If you doubt me, just think of what Californians migrating to Colorado achieved.

Most recently, Californians, faced with an increasingly uninhabitable state, are setting their sights on Oklahoma, which is actually incentivizing their moves for economic reasons. It appears, however, that Oklahoma is simultaneously trying to implement policies that will protect the state (one with solid, all-American conservative values) from the coming California plague.

SFGATE ran a story today entitled “The surprising destination luring California transplants with $10,000.” It’s not just the prepaid 10% moving fee, though; that’s an enticement. It’s also that “The cost of living is 43.8% lower than in San Francisco.” Wow!

This magical new location is Tulsa, Oklahoma. The Tulsa relocation program is called Tulsa Remote, and it’s “attracted more than 3,600 members since its launch in 2018, with around 15% of those transplants coming from California.”

The program has been good to Tulsa, since it’s brought in a lot of tech people, all of whom must be telecommuting from higher-cost (and higher-wage) states. In other words, they’re spending their California income in Tulsa, which is good for the Tulsa economy. The program especially wants white collar (read: affluent) people who like to get out and about within the community (read: spend money).

It's a clever program because it has successfully pumped a lot of money into the community without taking jobs from the community. “For every $1 spent attracting remote workers, Tulsa Remote returns more than $4 to Tulsans through local spending, job creation and increased tax revenue...”

Currently, one real estate agent says that the people relocating are “interested in moving to a more politically conservative state,” as well as one with a lower cost of living and less crime. However, if we’re talking tech, we’re talking college grads and, if we’re talking college grads, we’re talking leftists.

In any event, once word gets out about the fact that Tulsa specifically and Oklahoma generally are up-and-coming hip, affordable places to live, the leftists, like lemmings, will follow. (I see that with vacations. All of my old friends from California inevitably go on exactly the same overseas vacations. One year, they’re all in Turkey; the next year, off to Iceland.)

Oklahoma’s conservative political class, while undoubtedly pleased about the revenue, is worried about what happens as more Californians head their way, especially teachers. After all, with Colorado as a grim example, and conservatism in Texas more at risk than ever before (even though it’s still doing all right), one can’t be too careful.

On the one hand, Oklahoma is trying to incentivize teachers to head its way. Says Ryan Walters, Oklahoma’s education superintendent:

“We offered the largest signing bonuses for teachers in the country. If you're in the top 10 percent of teachers in the country, we give you $50,000 in Oklahoma. So we've seen teachers come from blue states, red states all over to come to Oklahoma. They especially are fleeing the teachers unions, the grip that they've had on them in these blue states,” Walters said.

However, even conservatives from blue states know blue state educational values. Therefore, Walters, working in conjunction with PragerU, “plans to release a new certification test for teachers moving into the state from blue states.” The planned test, called American First, “will include basic questions about American history, civics, and ‘common sense.’”

This is a wonderful idea. Glenn Reynolds used to advocate for a “welcome wagon” approach for blue state immigrants into red states: “Something that would explain to them why the place they’re moving to is doing better than the place they left, and suggesting that they might not want to vote for the same policies that are driving their old home states into bankruptcy.”

So, by all means, set up those welcome wagons, but the first and most important thing is to make sure that the new teachers aren’t Marxists. Thankfully, Oklahoma’s governing class gets this.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/08/oklahoma_plans_to_save_itself_from_a_california_invasion.html

Hey Canada, Your Failed Wildfire Management Is Poisoning America's Skies

 Representative John James, a Republican from Michigan, penned a blistering letter to Canadian leaders, warning their out-of-control wildfires are "poisoning the air and threatening the health of millions across Michigan and the Midwest."

Now, that toxic smoke is pouring into the Northeast, and soon, into New York City. Just when many thought Justin Trudeau's leadership was disastrous, the beginning of the globalist Mark Carney era suggests things can and will likely get even worse.

Canada is experiencing its second-worst wildfire season on record. Government data shows 4,00 wildfires have been recorded so far this year.

"Despite the clear public health crisis, Canadian officials have shown alarming disregard," Rep. James wrote in a press release, informing his constituents about the letter he fired off to Canadian leaders, urging immediate action to contain the growing wildfire crisis that is poisoning America's air. 

If Canada's globalist 'green' leaders actually cared about the planet, they would have practiced proper forest management. But they didn't, and they failed miserably. Rep. James noted that the 2023 wildfire season in Canada was equivalent to "running over 500 million cars for a full year."

At the moment, smoke from 740 Canadian wildfires is spreading south and degrading air quality over a massive stretch of North America. New York City is under air-quality alerts...

"This lack of urgency undermines decades of cross-border cooperation and damages the U.S.—Canada relationship," Rep. James said. 

The bigger question is whether these forest fires are truly natural ... or part of a broader form of hybrid warfare.

https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/hey-canada-your-failed-wildfire-management-poisoning-our-skies

Russia Says It Is No Longer Bound by Intermediate Missile Moratorium

 


Russia no longer considers itself bound by a moratorium on the deployment of ground-based intermediate and shorter range missiles, the Foreign Ministry said.

Conditions for maintaining the unilateral moratorium on the deployment of such weapons are no longer in place, the ministry said in a statement Monday. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov signaled the move would happen in December.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-08-04/russia-says-no-longer-bound-by-intermediate-missile-moratorium

Vertex Pharmaceuticals stock falls after pain drug fails in Phase 2

 Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (NASDAQ:VRTX) stock fell 7% after the company announced that its investigational pain medication failed to meet the primary endpoint in a Phase 2 clinical trial.

The Boston-based biotech company reported that VX-993, its selective NaV1.8 pain signal inhibitor, did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement in treating acute pain following bunionectomy surgery compared to placebo. The study measured pain reduction over 48 hours post-surgery.

According to the trial results, patients receiving the highest dose of VX-993 showed a mean pain reduction score of 74.5 compared to 50.2 for placebo, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance with a p-value of 0.1190. The mid and low doses similarly failed to show significant improvement over placebo.

"This proof-of-concept study was powered to test whether VX-993 would result in higher clinical efficacy than previously demonstrated with the NaV1.8 pathway," said Carmen Bozic, M.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer at Vertex. "Based on these results, VX-993 is not expected to be superior to our existing NaV1.8 inhibitors and therefore we will not be advancing it as monotherapy in acute pain."

The company noted that VX-993 was generally safe and well-tolerated, with most adverse events being mild to moderate. The safety profile was similar to placebo, with no serious adverse events related to the drug.

Vertex also reported its second quarter results and maintained its full-year revenue guidance despite the clinical setback.

https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/vertex-pharmaceuticals-stock-falls-after-pain-drug-fails-in-phase-2-study-93CH-4168706