Search This Blog

Sunday, June 14, 2020

Fast drying face masks to hit Uniqlo shelves in Japan on Friday

Fast Retailing Co. will start selling washable and fast-drying face masks at its Uniqlo stores in Japan on Friday for customers seeking suitable face gear for the hot summer amid lingering concerns about coronavirus infection.
The company said Monday it will sell a pack of three masks, made of the same material as its Airism underwear products, for 990 yen ($9.30). The masks will be available in three sizes — small, medium and large — and can be bought at domestic Uniqlo outlets and online.
Purchases will be limited to one pack per size per person, the operator of Uniqlo casual clothing store chain said, adding it plans to manufacture 500,000 packs a week.
The company also said it plans to offer the masks at Uniqlo stores overseas.
The new mask, which has three-layers and includes a filter, is able to maintain its basic efficacy even after being washed 20 times, the company said.

https://www.marketscreener.com/FAST-RETAILING-CO-LTD-6491478/news/Fast-Retailing-drying-face-masks-to-hit-Uniqlo-shelves-in-Japan-on-Fri-30769929/

Imperial County has highest rate of Covid cases in Cal., wants to reopen anyway

Five days after Easter, the sound of helicopters hovering above Imperial County’s largest hospital was deafening.
There wasn’t enough room for a sudden influx of COVID-19 patients at El Centro Regional Medical Center. So new patients had to be transferred to hospitals hundreds of miles away. Helicopters circled overhead while waiting for the hospital’s only heliport to open up.
Judy Cruz, director of the emergency department, described the scene that day like something out of the 1979 war movie “Apocalypse Now.”
“Never had I seen helicopters flying out here like it’s Vietnam,” she said.
Below those helicopters, patients were screened inside military-grade medical tents set up in the hospital’s parking lot to handle the overflow. Inside the hospital, roughly 50 percent of all in-patients have COVID-19. The intensive care unit on the second floor has been unofficially renamed the COVID wing.
More than 200 COVID-19 patients have been transferred out of Imperial County, a rural community bordered by Arizona and Mexico that has the highest per capita rate of COVID-19 cases in California.
Imperial County remains hotspot with more COVID cases per capita than any other California county.
At first, they went to San Diego County or Palm Springs. But now patients are being transferred to Santa Barbara, San Francisco and Sacramento, county officials said.
The hospital saw similar surges after Mother’s Day and Memorial Day. Cruz is already scheduling extra staff for the next holiday.
“I know it’s just going to surge after Father’s Day,” she said.
Over the last 14 days, the county’s rate was 1,078 per 100,000 people.
The county with the second-highest rate, Kings County, had 655 per 100,000. And Tulare County, which is third on the list, has a rate of 138 per 100,000, according to data compiled by the Los Angeles Times. In San Diego, the rate is 56 per 100,000.

A community divided

Despite those grim statistics – or possibly because of them – a recent push by local business associations and the county Board of Supervisors to reopen Imperial County’s economy has divided the community.
Imperial County meets all but one of the state’s benchmarks to ease pandemic restrictions. And it is a long way off from meeting that mark.
The state requires counties to have seven consecutive days in which 8 percent or fewer of all COVID-19 tests come back positive. Currently, roughly 24 percent of all tests in Imperial County are coming back positive, three times higher than the state benchmark.
Realizing the county won’t be able to meet this benchmark any time soon, the Board of Supervisors sent a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom asking for local control.
Another letter, this one submitted by local business associations and cities, asks the governor to allow counties to make their own determinations regarding reopening instead of being beholden to the state’s one-size-fits-all approach.
Luis Plancarte, county chairman, said part of the reason behind wanting to reopen is that every region around Imperial County already has.
“If you look at neighboring areas, whether it is Mexico, Yuma, Riverside or San Diego counties, they’ve already to a certain degree opened up restaurants – with controls and social distancing,” he said Monday during a press conference. “We have seen a considerable amount of our community members who have gone out to those areas to either dine or recreate in other forms.”
Reopening locally, Plancarte said, could reduce the number of people leaving the county and would therefore lower exposure to the coronavirus.
Plancarte’s comments predated news out of Arizona that saw a surge in COVID-19 cases after the governor there lifted stay-at-home orders.
To be clear, the Board of Supervisors’ letter didn’t ask for Imperial County to reopen immediately.
Tony Rouhotas, the county’s chief executive officer, clarified that it only asked for local control and that any decision the county takes on reopening would be with the approval of the county health officer.
“We asked for local control; we didn’t ask for everything to be wide open,” he said.

Too soon to reopen

Hundreds of people throughout Imperial County believe reopening the economy too soon would put more people’s lives in danger.
More than 1,350 residents have signed a petition asking the governor to ignore the request of the officials elected to represent the community’s interests. The petition, started by the IV Nex-Gen Equity & Justice Coalition, also asks the state for more resources, including economic relief, to help Imperial County get through this crisis.
Instead of starting to reopen the county, the petition asks county officials to prioritize, “advocating for community resources to get our infection rate down, and expanded economic relief and relief awareness for workers and businesses.”
“Reopening must happen only when it is safe to do so, or else we are accepting unnecessary deaths in our community,” the petition states.
Carmina Ramirez and James Taylor, two of the members behind the petition, live close enough to the hospital that they often hear the cacophony of ambulances and helicopters carrying COVID-19 patients.
Ramirez, who lost one relative to COVID-19, said the Board of Supervisors’ letter makes it seem like elected officials are prioritizing businesses over people – even if the reopening is done under the guidance of county health officials.
“It goes back to what’s more important, people or business,” she said.
Taylor, who has asthma and only leaves the house to buy groceries, put it more bluntly.
“If I’m an elected official, I would rather be responsible for a business closing than someone dying,” he said.
When Taylor began tracking the county’s COVID-19 case rate a couple of weeks ago, it was around 470 per 100,000. Even then, that rate alarmed him and he began to speak out about it on social media. On the day the Board of Supervisors sent the letter to Newsom, the rate had jumped to over 1,000.
“In the face of this elevated rate, I thought it was crazy for them to be doing that,” he said.
There are other things politicians can do to help local businesses, Taylor added.
Elected officials under pressure from business associations know that Imperial County has been among California’s poorest for decades. Even during booming markets, people struggle to make ends meet.
According to the latest census figures, 21 percent of Imperial County residents live in poverty. Per capita income for 2018 was $17,000 and household median income – that is for a family of four – was $45,000.

Economic losses mounting

In El Centro, where 40 percent of the city’s general fund revenues come from sales tax, Mayor Efrain Silva hears about business closures on a daily basis.
Silva attended two public funerals in El Centro this week. Monday was for a police officer and Tuesday was for an X-ray technician. Both died of COVID-19 and both died outside of Imperial County because they had been transferred to other hospitals.
“It’s been a difficult 48 hours for me personally,” Silva said Wednesday.
The mayor of El Centro supports the county Board of Supervisors. Forcing businesses to remain shut would cause greater harm in an already disadvantaged community.
“I am of the opinion that we should try to open our economy as soon as possible because there is just absolutely no way that we can sustain the personal and economic losses in our community,” he said.
Any reopening, he said, should be done methodically and with the approval of county health officials, he added.
Silva has already heard from several businesses that simply won’t reopen. Because Imperial County is nowhere close to meeting the state’s benchmark for starting to reopen, he fears more businesses will follow.
“My fear is – getting back to that 8 percent – my fear is that we are not going to get there. Not any time soon,” he said. “Can businesses afford to remain closed another two or three or four months? I don’t think so.”

Cross-border tensions

The mayor recognizes this issue is dividing the community – in more ways than one.
One of the reasons attributed to the surge in COVID-19 cases is Imperial County’s proximity to Mexicali, a metropolis of more than one million people.
Mexicali has one of the highest cases of COVID-19 cases in Mexico. More than 3,100 people have been infected and 497 have died, according to data from the state of Baja California.
There are about 250,000 U.S. citizens and residents living in Baja California. And every day, thousands of them cross the border to work in Imperial County, Silva said.
This kind of cross-border travel has been a staple of border communities for centuries. But it is now viewed under a suspicious lens during the pandemic. Each side blames the other for spreading the coronavirus.
“Some people think that they may have picked it up over there and are bringing it here,” Silva said. “Mexicali people feel the opposite way, that we took it over there.”
Silva said some constituents have asked him to close the border, apparently unaware of the fact that the mayor of El Centro does not have the jurisdiction over federal immigration policy.
It is true that U.S. citizens who live in Mexico are being admitted to Imperial County hospitals at much higher rates than normal.
At El Centro Regional Medical Center, staff see 10 patients from Mexico every day and nine of them are there because of COVID-19.

Underlying conditions

But Imperial County’s proximity to the border isn’t the only reason behind the surging COVID-19 rates. Academics and activists in the region point to a laundry list of circumstances that predate the pandemic.
“I can tell you there’s hypertension, there’s poor air pollution, there’s cancers, there’s asthma, there’s diabetes, there’s countless things people here are exposed to,” said David Olmedo, an environmental health activist with Comite Civico del Valle.
The organization set up 40 air pollution monitors throughout the county – including a couple south of the border – and found that pollution levels far exceed federal standards.
“They are exposed to the environment,” Olmedo went on. “Exposed to pesticide, exposed to contaminated water, exposed to the heat, there’s the fact that we don’t have the most complete medical services here so people travel to San Diego for specialized care or the fact that a lot of people would just rather go to Mexicali.”
Olmedo sees these factors play out in different ways throughout the day.
For example, every morning before dawn hundreds of farmworkers cross the border to work. They cross at 3 and 4 in the morning to avoid long border wait times but don’t begin work until a few hours later. So, while they wait to work, they wait outside in the streets with no access to public restrooms and no masks.
All of their lives, farmworkers have been told that pesticides and heat could kill them. But it hasn’t, so when they are told about the coronavirus, they don’t take it seriously.
“Of course they think COVID is going to be just another virus they can fight off; they’ve fought off everything else,” Olemdo said.
Because COVID-19 attacks the respiratory system, high levels of air pollution in Imperial County are particularly concerning.
“Exposure to air pollution impairs lung function and it puts people behind the eight ball when facing the coronavirus,” said Vijay Limaye, an epidemiologist specializing in air pollution at the National Resources Defense Council.
A preliminary study from environmental health experts at Harvard University looked at the link between long-term exposure to certain air pollutants and coronavirus death rates. The study, which is currently being peer reviewed, adjusted for factors such as population density and smoking rates to try to isolate the effect of air pollution.
Researchers found that April’s data showed that even small increase in certain pollutants – specifically invisible fine particulate matter categorized as PM 2.5 – were associated with an 8 percent increase in death rates.
“In Imperial County, I think that finding takes on a whole new light,” Limaye said. “That county’s PM 2.5 pollution exceeds federal limits.”
All of these different factors contribute to the high number of cases in the county.
To help deal with the influx, staff are getting help from the National Guard and a federal team made up of nurses from all over the county. Those nurses are typically deployed to disaster zones, like Haiti after the earthquake. But now they are in El Centro during the pandemic.
The added staff is vital. They help take some of the pressure off from the day-to-day staff, who have been working nonstop for about a month.
“They are exhausted,” said Cruz, the director of the emergency department. “Mentally, emotionally, physically exhausted.”
She hasn’t taken a day off either.
But, she has found some time to sign the petition not to reopen.
“We’re not ready,” she said.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/story/2020-06-14/imperial-county-has-highest-rate-of-covid-19-cases-in-the-state-it-wants-to-reopen-anyway

Can NY employees avoid city tax by working from home?

Many employees at New York City hedge funds and other investment firms are now scattered around the region, working from home. Some view that as an opportunity to avoid a New York City tax, tax specialists say.
The city’s 4% unincorporated business tax raises about $2 billion a year for the city by taxing investment-fund managers, law firms and other individually owned businesses, based on the portion of sales or services performed within the city.
As employees sheltered at homes in the Hamptons or in the suburbs, a group of hedge funds and other investment-management firms have begun using apps to track where their New York-based employees are working day to day. Their goal is to show that a large portion of the fees paid to investment managers were for services performed outside the city and therefore not subject to the city tax.
The city is already forecasting a $359 million decline in collections of the unincorporated business tax compared with the $2.14 billion in last year’s budget, without taking into account actions of companies looking to shift accounting of sales outside the city.
“We are concerned about the potential impact of the shift of employees out of the city and will adjust upcoming forecasts if it becomes a trend that affects city revenue,” said Laura Feyer, a spokeswoman for the mayor. “Meanwhile, we will continue to make responsible budget choices and advocate for federal government support.”
In the past four weeks, a dozen investment-management companies, with a total of $1.2 trillion in assets under management, have signed up to electronically document employee locations based on cell-tower, global-positioning and wireless data, said Nishant Mittal, co-founder of Monaeo, an app used by companies and individuals to document residency for tax purposes. Monaeo was acquired in March by Topia, a company that helps companies manage global business travel and employee mobility.
He said about half were hedge-fund managers and the others were managers of other investment vehicles.
Driving the push, he said, was the expectation by the firms that many employees will continue to work from home even after offices are allowed to reopen in the next few weeks.
“We believe that in the new world people will be comfortable working from home,” even after New York City fully reopens, he said. “Even if that is only one to two days a week, that is going to make the tax savings worthwhile from an asset manager perspective.
Here is how it works for a hedge fund with $50 billion in assets. Typically, fund managers are paid 2% of assets each year plus 20% of investment gain. The 2% fee works out to an unincorporated business tax of $40 million on a gain of $1 billion at the city’s 4% rate.
If all employees could show they worked outside the city during just the past three months that would result in a $10 million savings for the investment managers — and a $10 million loss to the city.
“UBT uses the standard of where the services are performed,” said Timothy Noonan, a law partner at Hodgson Russ LLP who specializes in litigation on New York City and New York state residency rules. “If the services are performed by all the analysts in their vacation property in the Hamptons or New Jersey, those services would not be allocated to New York City.”
Many wealthy individuals are also looking for ways to take advantage of the pandemic by limiting the days they spend in New York and turning their vacation homes into their main residence. But under complex rules in place, the city and state routinely challenges and audits many such shifts.
A taxpayer who continues to work for a New York company but moves out of state has to show the change was made for the convenience of the employer, said Robert Willens, a tax and accounting consultant who publishes a tax newsletter.
The state hasn’t indicated whether it views people working at home because of the virus as working there for the convenience of the employer.
But the rules of the UBT are simpler and clearer. Beginning in 2009, the city began switching from a complicated formula based on three factors — payroll, property and receipts — to a simpler test based on sales alone.
A city study based on 2014 tax receipts found that finance and real estate accounted for 42% of tax liability under the tax, but only 19.5% of taxpayers. Legal services accounted for 28%, followed by professional services with 17%.
Mr. Mittal said that law firms, accounting firms and other partnerships could take advantage of the same provision as well.
“It applies to everybody,” he said. “The finance people are the first ones to figure it out. They are very savvy when taxes on a billion dollars in gross receipts is at stake.”
https://www.marketscreener.com/news/New-York-Hedge-Fund-Traders-Aim-to-Avoid-City-Tax-by-WFH–30769489/?countview=0

Macrolides and viral infections: focus on azithromycin in COVID-19 pathology

AriannaPaniabMarinellaLauriolacAlessandraRomandiniabFrancescoScaglioneabhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106053

Highlights

There is the necessity to quickly find therapeutic options to treat novel SARS-CoV2
Azithromycin has demonstrated to have antiviral and immunomodulatory effects, which could be effective in the hyper-inflammatory syndrome caused by SARS-CoV2
Azithromycin has also shown clinical efficacy in respiratory distress syndrome and in viral infections
Preliminary results regarding the efficacy of the combination of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 are conflicting
There are some concerns regarding the association of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine because of Qt prolongation
Further studies have to be performed to investigate safety and efficacy of azithromycin and the combination with hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19

Abstract

The emergence of the new disease COVID-19, is posing the challenge of seeking effective therapies. Since the most severe clinical manifestation of COVID-19 appeared to be a severe acute respiratory syndrome, azithromycin has been proposed as a potential treatment.
Azithromycin is known to have immunomodulating and antiviral properties. In vitro studies have demonstrated the capacity of azithromycin to reduce production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, IL-6, TNF alpha, reduce oxidative stress and modulate T-helper functions. At the same time there are multiple clinical evidences of the role of azithromycin in acute respiratory distress syndrome and against MERS. Some preliminary evidences have demonstrated controversial results regarding efficacy of azithromycin in combination with hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19. Firstly, a French trial demonstrated 100% of virological negativization of six patients treated with azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine vs 57.1% of patients treated with only hydroxychloroquine and 12.5% of the control group (p<0.05). On the other hand, another case series revealed no efficacy at all on eleven patients treated with same combination and doses.
Furthermore, there are some concerns regarding the association of azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine because of the potential Qt prolongation. In fact, both drugs have this as potential side effect and evidences regarding the safety use of this combination are controversial.
Despite the necessity to quickly find solutions for COVID-19, extreme caution must be used in evaluating the risk-benefit balance. However, based on preclinical and clinical evidences and some preliminary results in COVID-19, azithromycin could have a potential in the fight against this new disease.
Download PDF
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920302235

Japan hasn’t decided to ease entry ban, foreign minister says

Japanese Foreign Minister Toshimitsu Motegi said on Monday it was not true the government had decided to ease an entry ban, which was implemented to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus, for people from certain countries.
The Yomiuri daily reported last week that Japan may restart business trips to and from Australia, New Zealand, Vietnam and Thailand in the next few months.
The government is examining ways to ease entry bans, taking into consideration various factors comprehensively, and would ease restrictions in stages if it decided to do so, Motegi told parliament.
Motegi has agreed with his counterparts from Vietnam, Australia and New Zealand to discuses the possibility of re-allowing travel to those who need it, he said.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-japan/japan-hasnt-decided-to-ease-entry-ban-foreign-minister-says-idUSKBN23M076

Onshoring all drug manufacturing may make us less resilient

Covid-19’s economic implications will unfold for decades. The virus will pass; people will go to baseball games and concerts again. But economic policy will change in ways that will affect our lives for generations. Presidential economic advisor Peter Navarro is advocating a “Buy American” executive order that would force federal agencies to buy American-made versions of some medical and pharmaceutical equipment, drugs, and vaccines. One justification for this proposal is the oft-cited statistic that 80 percent of drugs in America come from China. Given that the government is a primary purchaser of drugs, Navarro’s order would force the pharmaceutical industry to restructure the way it manufactures and distributes its products.
Even if that order doesn’t come to fruition, changes in how we source drugs are probably inevitable. New York governor Andrew Cuomo uses his daily updates to call for bringing more medical-supply manufacturing back to America, to promote resilience. Economists and commentators, once unabashed champions of globalization, are rethinking our reliance on foreign suppliers in all industries.
The question is presented as a trade-off between resilience—the ability to withstand a big, unpredictable shock—and efficiency, getting stuff as cheaply and quickly as possible. Americans have just experienced shortages of many goods, especially medical supplies, so it’s tempting to argue that we should focus on resilience. But a “Buy American” drug program does not promote resilience.
First, like it or not, beating Covid-19 will require international cooperation. The best scientists and drug makers in each country are working on treatments and vaccines. Making these treatments or vaccines available to as many people as possible will require goods, knowledge, supplies, and chemicals from around the world. Buy American would not just slow progress on Covid-19; pharmaceutical companies would be left scrambling to produce other critical drugs, like insulin.
Even as a longer-term strategy, a Buy American program would make us less resilient. First, the 80 percent figure of drugs coming from China is false. In fact, about 60 percent of American pharmaceutical spending is on domestically produced drugs, though strictly speaking, American-made is hard to define, because many intermediate inputs come from abroad.
Diversification is less risky than concentrating all your supply from one place, even if it’s your own country. If something happens to disrupt your domestic supply chain, like a disease outbreak, major earthquake, or war, then sourcing from multiple, less affected countries means less risk. Our supply chain is highly diversified and includes 150 countries; relying on one country is risky. Less trade would also make drugs more expensive and increase health-care costs.
It’s possible, and even wise, to promote more domestic drug manufacturing to improve efficiency and resiliency. But a major reason why drugs aren’t made in America is tax and regulatory policy that makes it prohibitively expensive to do so. Part of the executive order would lessen FDA regulations and hold foreign suppliers to the same standard. But instead of a Buy American policy, the U.S. should remove such distortions and create a natural incentive to make more drugs here. With increased investment and technical innovation, it may even become more profitable and efficient to do so.
Allison Schrager is a senior fellow at Manhattan Institute.
https://www.city-journal.org/buy-american-drug-manufacturing

Meditation App Headspace Secures $47.7M More In Funding – Filing

The Orange Dot, better known as Headspace, has closed on $47.7 million in equity funding, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
I reached out to the mindfulness and meditation startup for more information and it confirmed that the financing is an extension to a Series C that closed in February. Indeed, the filing comes nearly exactly four months after Headspace secured $93 million in a Series C round that we reported on here. That financing included $53 million in equity and $40 million in debt.
This latest infusion brings Santa Monica, California-based Headspace’s total venture and debt raised since its inception in 2010 (Was it really founded a decade ago?!) to about $216 million, according to Crunchbase data. The company declined to disclose at what valuation the Series C was raised.
In an email statement, Headspace said: “We had always planned an extension of our Series C. This extension is now complete and was led by existing investors, adding $47.7 million to the $53 million raised in February, bringing the total equity funding to $100.7 million for our Series C.”
All Series A, B, and C lead investors participated, according to the company. Some of those backers include Blisce/, Waverley Capital, Times Bridge (the global investments and partnerships arm of The Times Group of India), The Chernin Group, Spectrum Equity and Advancit Capital.
To rise above the hype around meditation, Headspace claims to be “the most science-backed digital mindfulness product in the market.” As an example of that, the company said in February it was conducting over 70 clinical research studies with institutions such as Carnegie Mellon University and Stanford University.
Over the years, it’s branched out from its consumer app into different product lines including “Headspace for Work,” its B2B segment that counts Starbucks, Adobe, Hyatt and GE among its 600 enterprise customers. It’s also offering “Headspace Health,” an effort to integrate mindfulness into health care. In general, the company says its goal is to help users apply mindfulness to improve their health via content around stress, anxiety, sleep, focus and other things.

Growth

Since its founding, Headspace said as of February it had experienced over 62 million downloads in 190 countries and had more than 2 million paid subscribers. No word yet on if it’s seen a spike in users due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In addition to growing its direct-to-consumer business, Headspace said it will continue to invest in its Headspace for Work segment, which has seen its revenue double year over year from 2017 to 2018 and most recently in 2019. It also plans to continue putting money into its health care segment.
In 2019, the company launched localized versions of the app in French and German, and appointed former Apple executive Renate Nyborg as head of its European division to lead expansion in that region. Also last year, Headspace launched in Latin America with versions in Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. It expanded into Asia through strategic relationships with partners such as The Times of India. In February, the company said it planned to use its new capital in part to continue expanding internationally.
Of course, Headspace is not alone in the meditation app space. Last year, Calm announced the close of an $88 million Series B round that propelled it into unicorn status with a $1 billion valuation. In July, it announced a $27 million extension to that round.
Meditation App Headspace Secures $47.7M More In Funding, Filing Shows