Search This Blog

Friday, April 2, 2021

Functionally distinct coronavirus antibody features in children and elderly

 

  • Kevin J. Selva
  • Carolien E. van de Sandt
  • […]
  • Amy W. Chung 

  • DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22236-7

    Abstract

    The hallmarks of COVID-19 are higher pathogenicity and mortality in the elderly compared to children. Examining baseline SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactive immunological responses, induced by circulating human coronaviruses (hCoVs), is needed to understand such divergent clinical outcomes. Here we show analysis of coronavirus antibody responses of pre-pandemic healthy children (n = 89), adults (n = 98), elderly (n = 57), and COVID-19 patients (n = 50) by systems serology. Moderate levels of cross-reactive, but non-neutralizing, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies are detected in pre-pandemic healthy individuals. SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific Fcγ receptor binding accurately distinguishes COVID-19 patients from healthy individuals, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces qualitative changes to antibody Fc, enhancing Fcγ receptor engagement. Higher cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG are observed in healthy elderly, while healthy children display elevated SARS-CoV-2 IgM, suggesting that children have fewer hCoV exposures, resulting in less-experienced but more polyreactive humoral immunity. Age-dependent analysis of COVID-19 patients, confirms elevated class-switched antibodies in elderly, while children have stronger Fc responses which we demonstrate are functionally different. These insights will inform COVID-19 vaccination strategies, improved serological diagnostics and therapeutics.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22236-7


    Coagulation factors directly cleave SARS-CoV-2 spike, enhance viral entry

     

    Edward R KastenhuberJavier A. JaimesJared L. JohnsonMarisa MercadanteFrauke MueckschYiska WeisblumYaron BramRobert E. SchwartzGary R. WhittakerLewis C. Cantley

    CDC updates guidance to cruise ship industry, urges vax

     The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention on Friday issued new guidance to the cruise ship industry, including the need for COVID-19 vaccinations, a necessary step before passenger voyages can resume.

    The new technical instructions, the first update since October, include increasing from weekly to daily reporting frequency of COVID-19 cases and illnesses and implementing routine testing of all crew based on a ship’s COVID-19 status and establishing a plan and timeline for vaccination of crew and port personnel.

    “COVID-19 vaccination efforts will be critical in the safe resumption of passenger operations,” the CDC said.

    DC said the next phase of the CDC’s conditional sail order will include simulated voyages to will allow crew and port personnel to practice new COVID-19 operational procedures with volunteers before sailing with passengers.

    “CDC is committed to working with the cruise industry and seaport partners to resume cruising when it is safe to do so, following the phased approach outlined” in October’s conditional sail order,” the agency said.

    It did not specify a date for the resumption of cruise operations from U.S. ports despite calls from the industry for planning for a phased resumption by the beginning of July. The CDC said it will issue additional guidance before it will allow cruises to resume.

    The Cruise Lines International Association, which represents Carnival Corp, Norwegian Cruise Line and Royal Caribbean Cruises and others had pleaded with CDC to issue new guidance, saying in a March 24 statement the “lack of any action by the CDC has effectively banned all sailings in the largest cruise market in the world.” It did not immediately comment on Friday.

    The group had said the prior conditional sail order issued in October was “outdated” and “does not reflect the industry’s proven advancements and success operating in other parts of the world, nor the advent of vaccines, and unfairly treats cruises differently. Cruise lines should be treated the same as other travel, tourism, hospitality, and entertainment sectors.”

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-cruises/cdc-updates-guidance-to-cruise-ship-industry-urges-vaccinations-idUSKBN2BP1IY

    Sepsis: Standard of Care Fails While Novel Meds, Diagnostics Go Unused

     Sepsis is among the best-known and least effectively treated conditions in the modern world. The standard of care has failed for these infections, leaving the U.S. healthcare system with $62 billion and 270,000 deaths annually. Globally, 11 million die from sepsis each year.

    Effective drugs and diagnostics are available. They’re just not used, according to panelists at the Demy-Colton Virtual Salon, focused on sepsis.

    “One of the things missing from the sepsis conversation is data. We don’t have the data to advance clinical practice and innovation because it’s siloed among the states (and healthcare systems),” and the players aren’t talking to one another, Thomas Heymann, president and CEO of the Sepsis Alliance, told the Salon audience.

    To provide that data, the Sepsis Alliance launched the National Sepsis National Registry Initiative in January 2021. Its goal is to aggregate and analyze thousands of longitudinal records to gain insights into comorbidities, treatments, and outcomes associated with sepsis.

    Another significant problem is the healthcare reimbursement system, panelists agreed. It relies on blood cultures for diagnoses and, until results are returned – typically one to five days later – doctors prescribe older, generic, broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatments. The alternative is a fast, but more expensive, test that identifies the specific pathogen and the appropriate treatment in less than three hours.

    With sepsis, speed is of the essence. The mortality rate of sepsis patients increases by as much as 8% each hour proper treatment is not started.

    “Sepsis is a community-acquired syndrome,” Heymann said. “It often stems from urinary tract infections and spider bites, for example, but also can be acquired in the hospital. Sepsis is twice as common as stroke, and twice as deadly. The standard of care is failing.”

    The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) invested in – and the FDA approved – new assays to detect and characterize the organisms responsible for sepsis and to identify the most effective drugs, Rick Bright, Ph.D., SVP, pandemic Prevention & response, at Rockefeller Foundation and a former director of BARDA, stressed. “There are amazing diagnostics, but they’re not being used.”

    Bright’s personal experience is an all-too-common case in point. “When I went into urgent care with signs of an infection in my thumb (from gardening), I had to practically beg them to take a culture to identify the organism. They gave me Bactrim and sent me home. I went to the emergency room 10 hours later. They sent me home (with another antibiotic). They didn’t do a blood culture until 6 days later. In the course of 3 days, I was prescribed 7 antibiotics. The hospital said I had a methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. Then they scheduled the thumb for amputation.”

    In Bright’s case, the test results arrived before the amputation, enabling an effective therapy to be delivered. It was a branded drug. Then, he said, “I got a note from my insurance company saying it wouldn’t cover the branded antibiotic.”

    “This is the antithesis of precision medicine,” Heymann commented.

    The delay in diagnosis and treatment is the direct result of how hospitals are reimbursed. As Ciara Kennedy, Ph.D., president and CEO of Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, explained, “Hospitals are paid based upon bundled payments for disease codes. For infections, if a patient is given a branded medicine, the hospital loses money. So, generics are first-line therapies.”

    The SEP-1 Early Management Bundle – put in place in 2015 by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) – established a protocol to follow when sepsis is suspected. It should have removed that barrier, but didn’t.

    Now what’s needed is “encouraging the doctors not just to perform the test, but to read the test and do what is calls for. That’s where the emphasis should be,” Prabhavathi Fernandes, Ph.D., chair of the scientific advisory board of Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership, and chair of the National Biodefense Science Board, said.

    Currently, Kennedy added, “A drug’s value is closely tied to its (sales) volume. The more a drug is used, the greater the return for investors. We need to break that system. Without a system and framework to deliver value, innovation won’t be funded.”

    The Pasteur Act (S.4760)  referred to Committee in 2020, aims to address that. “The Pasteur Act is portrayed as a handout to pharma, but it’s actually a safety net for patients,” she continued. As the bill states, it “authorizes the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to enter into subscription contracts for critical-need antimicrobial drugs,” to identify “critical need” antimicrobials, and to develop a list of infections for which innovative antimicrobial treatments are needed.

    The COVID-19 pandemic, in some ways, is bringing attention to sepsis. “There is a clear clinical link between (serious) COVID-19 and sepsis if COVID-19 isn’t treated appropriately,” John Sperzel, III, president and CEO of T2 Biosystems Inc., said.

    Yet, Kennedy added, “There is a misrecognition of what’s killing COVID-19 patients. If a patient dies because of sequelae after COVID-19, they say he or she died of COVID-19.”

    Part of the challenge is that there’s no clear picture of sepsis patients. “Until there is, you don’t connect with them,” she said.

    As a result, panelists noted that many companies go bankrupt after their sepsis diagnostics or therapeutics are approved, and many others have less than six months of cash. Therefore, Kennedy said, “New drugs may not survive because of funding challenges.”

    The long-term consequences are serious. Many sepsis patients never fully recover, leading to chronic conditions and greater susceptibility to subsequent sepsis infections that, often, lead to death. More work to characterize the organisms early on, combined with administration of the proper drug – perhaps based upon biomarkers and computer-aided diagnosis, could go a long way to resolving the problem. “If you don’t think about sepsis, you don’t treat it,” Bright said.

    Education and deeper understanding are critical to successfully diagnosing and treating sepsis. As Fernandes concluded, “It's important to understand that every infection, until it goes away, can become serious.”

    https://www.biospace.com/article/sepsis-standard-of-care-fails-while-novel-meds-and-diagnostics-go-unused/

    Can You Spread COVID-19 Once Vaccinated? Data Not Yet Clear

     If you’re one of the 17% of Americans that have been fully vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, you are probably feeling some level of relief. But the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warns not to throw your mask away just yet. 

    On Monday, CDC director Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky made a comment in an interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that caused a stir of controversy in the scientific community.  

    "Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don`t get sick, and that it`s not just in the clinical trials but it`s also in real-world data,” Walensky said, creating the assumption that transmission from a vaccinated person was impossible.  

    Yesterday the agency backpedaled on Walensky’s assertion, as this contradicted the CDC’s previous guidance regarding continued precautions even after being fully vaccinated. 

    “Dr. Walensky spoke broadly during this interview,” an agency spokesman told The Times. “It’s possible that some people who are fully vaccinated could get Covid-19. The evidence isn’t clear whether they can spread the virus to others. We are continuing to evaluate the evidence.” 

    Currently, studies are underway all around the world trying to determine whether or not vaccinated individuals can still spread the virus. While data is promising, it’s not yet ready to make that kind of positive claim. 

    The vaccines currently approved for use against COVID-19 are about 90% effective. A real-world study in frontline workers reported that even after the first shot, individuals had 80% protection of not getting seriously ill but also preventing infection in the first place.  

    “If you can’t get infected, you can’t infect anyone else, which means the vaccines can reduce transmission as well as the disease,” said Marm Kilpatrick, an infectious diseases researcher at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who was not involved in the study. 

    So while data is trending towards suggesting it is harder for vaccinated people to become infected, Paul Duprex, director of the Center for Vaccine Research at the University of Pittsburgh warns, “Don’t think for one second that they cannot get infected.” 

    Misinformation has abounded amidst this pandemic, which is why the scientific community wasn’t too pleased with Walensky’s generalized implication that vaccinated individuals don’t carry and therefore can’t spread the virus.  

    “If Dr. Walensky had said most vaccinated people do not carry the virus, we would not be having this discussion,” said John Moore, a virologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York. 

    “What we know is the vaccines are very substantially effective against infection — there’s more and more data on that — but nothing is 100 percent. It is an important public health message that needs to be gotten right.” 

    While the real-world studies have been impressively positive, there has yet to be a vaccine that has provided complete 100% protection to every population. Variants have a way of sidestepping the immune system to infect. Additionally, those who are immunocompromised may experience a more blunted response to vaccination. 

    Cases of infection after vaccination are considered “breakthrough” infections. These cases have been rare, compared to the numbers being vaccinated. Experts say they shouldn’t cause panic and are not a reason to avoid vaccination. The vaccines are extremely effective at preventing serious disease and complications that lead to hospitalization and death.  

    Walensky closed her interview with a plea to Americans, “We know that these masks work, and we know that every individual should be taking it upon themselves to do what they can to protect themselves and to protect others. We are oh, so very close. 

    “The president announced today, 90 percent of Americans will be eligible for a vaccine by April 19th. And 90 percent of Americans will be within five miles of a vaccination site by April 19th, extraordinary measures to get to where we need to be. So we’re just asking people to wear masks for just a bit longer.” 

    There have been 30.6 million coronavirus cases diagnosed in the US since the first case in 2020, with 553,000 deaths. A recorded 56 million have been fully vaccinated with an average of 2.8 million people being vaccinated every day.  

    “Vaccinated people should not be throwing away their masks at this point,” Moore said. “This pandemic is not over.” 

    https://www.biospace.com/article/can-you-spread-covid-19-once-vaccinated-data-not-yet-clear-/

    5 FDA approval decisions to watch in Q2

     The Food and Drug Administration doesn't yet have a new full-time commissioner. But whoever fills the seat in the coming months — be it acting chief Janet Woodcock or another candidate — could start the job with some tough decisions to make.

    At the top of the list is whether the agency should clear an experimental Alzheimer's drug from Biogen. That decision is among the most consequential the FDA has ever faced, as an approval or rejection will have ripple effects on Alzheimer's research, the agency's reputation and the biotech sector for years to come.

    But there are other consequential verdicts expected as well. The agency will likely soon begin reviewing a coronavirus vaccine from AstraZeneca that has been the subject of an unusual public dispute between the drugmaker and its independent trial review board.

    Within the next three months the FDA could also change the standard of care for a rare genetic disease and clear a new vaccine for one of the world's most common infections.

    Any rejection could add to an impression that the FDA is becoming stricter of late, after a series of surprising regulatory knockbacks and an industry-wide evaluation of cancer immunotherapy approvals. Clearance of Biogen's drug, meanwhile, would have the opposite effect.

    Editor's note: The following five drugs are listed in order of the date by which the FDA is expected to make a decision on approval.

    Acadia Pharmaceuticals' pimavanserin for dementia-related psychosis

    Pimavanserin is a critical asset for Acadia Pharmaceuticals. The company's only product, it's been on the market for several years, sold under the brand name Nuplazid for the treatment of Parkinson's disease psychosis. In 2020, net sales of Nuplazid rose 30%.

    Acadia has been trying to stoke further growth by getting its drug cleared for use in more diseases. Last year, the company asked the FDA for an approval in dementia-related psychosis, with a decision date set for April 3.

    Acadia executives thought the outlook for approval was good. That was, until a few weeks ago, when they disclosed that regulators found "deficiencies" in the company's application. According to Acadia, the deficiencies prevent the FDA from discussing marketing requirements at this time.

    "We were extremely surprised and disappointed to receive such a communication from the FDA, and to receive it so late in the review cycle," Steve Davis, Acadia's CEO, said during a call with investors this month.

    While not yet an official rejection, the agency's feedback seems to have ruled out an April approval and lowered the chance of an eventual OK. Vamil Divan, an analyst at Mizuho Securities, wrote in a recent note to clients that his team believes the odds are at 60%, versus 70% previously. They also expect the drug's launch in dementia-related psychosis to be pushed back multiple years, to 2024.

    AstraZeneca and Oxford's coronavirus vaccine

    The three coronavirus vaccines available for use in the U.S. were cleared by the FDA without much drama. But that likely won't be the case for the fourth potential shot, from AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford.

    AstraZeneca's shot appears headed towards a review in April. A series of communication missteps and safety setbacks, however, have damaged the company's credibility as well as public perception of the shot.

    Positive but confusing data from earlier studies in the U.K. and elsewhere left it unclear how to best use the shot or whether it worked as well in the elderly. A trial stoppage of almost two months, meanwhile, delayed AstraZeneca's larger trial in the U.S. and South America. And more recently, rare, abnormal blood clots have occurred during the shot's roll-out in Europe, leading a large number of countries to temporarily suspend vaccinations. Some have since resumed administration.

    Last week, Astrazeneca reported the shot was safe and strongly effective at preventing COVID-19 in the U.S. study, clearing a major test and setting the stage for the FDA's review. But the good news was shadowed by controversy. The board of independent experts overseeing the trial publicly disputed the initial results the drugmaker released — an unusual and stunning rebuke.

    The advisory meeting to discuss the shot, which could take place next month, will likely reflect those twists and turns. Briefing documents outlining the FDA's own findings could shed light on the disagreement between AstraZeneca and its data monitoring board. And the meeting will give scientific experts a chance to question AstraZeneca executives on that topic and several other outstanding questions.

    Sanofi's avalglucosidase alfa for Pompe disease

    People with Pompe disease have a genetic mutation that stops their bodies from producing a key enzyme that breaks down a complex sugar called glycogen. The resulting buildup of glycogen causes progressive tissue damage and other health problems.

    For years, the main treatment for Pompe has been chronic treatment with a so-called enzyme replacement therapy, called Lumizyme, that Sanofi acquired when it bought rare disease drug developer Genzyme ten years ago. But the French pharmaceutical giant aims to set a new treatment standard by winning approval of a successor therapy called avalglucosidase alfa. The new treatment is meant to deliver more of the enzyme into cells, improving potency.

    The company has yet to prove that hypothesis, however. In a Phase 3 study, avalglucosidase alfa matched Lumizyme as measured by improvements in respiratory function, the main goal of the trial. The "clinical relevance" of the difference between how the two drugs work hasn't been established yet, the company said.

    Still, approval of Sanofi's new drug could raise the bar for a number of other treatments in development, among them a pill from Amicus Therapeutics and gene therapies from Roche, Bayer and Avrobio.

    A decision is expected by May 18.

    Biogen's aducanumab for Alzheimer's disease

    Despite extensive research efforts, Alzheimer's disease remains one of the most challenging areas of drug development. Promising therapies have failed time and again, leaving patients with only a small crop of treatments to combat their symptoms, rather than the disease itself.

    But the options for treatment could change soon. The FDA should decide by June 7 whether to approve Biogen's aducanumab, which many consider the most closely watched drug in all of biotech. A nod from regulators would make aducanumab the first marketed drug meant to slow the progression of Alzheimer's — a title that Wall Street analysts expect to translate to billions of dollars in annual sales.

    An approval is far from certain, however. The FDA's own statisticians, as well as an external group of advisors, have criticized the aducanumab data and the ways in which Biogen analyzed it. In a November meeting, those advisors voted almost unanimously against the drug. Though the FDA isn't required to follow these recommendations, it typically does.

    Still, analysts haven't written off aducanumab. Not only is the FDA under immense pressure to get more Alzheimer's drugs to patients, but the agency's clinical staff have been uncharacteristically supportive of Biogen's application.

    When regulators recently decided to extend their review of aducanumab, some took it as a sign they're combing over more data that could support an approval. Evercore ISI analyst Umer Raffat had told BioPharma Dive that an extended review would bump his estimate for the probability of approval from below 50% up to 70%. The investment bank Stifel, meanwhile, has forecasted a 60% chance of approval.

    Pfizer's 20-valent pneumococcal vaccine

    Two companies, Pfizer and Merck & Co., have approved vaccines to prevent pneumococcal disease. Neither of those vaccines, however, protect against key emerging strains of the infectious bacteria. And that's why both are locked in a race to get the next generation of shots onto the market. That race could reach its conclusion this year.

    Pfizer is in the lead with its experimental vaccine that stimulates immunity to 20 different strains of disease-causing bacteria.

    The new product protects against the same 13 serotypes that the current standard, Prevnar 13, does, plus seven more that have been associated with higher death rates, antibiotic resistance or meningitis. At nearly $6 billion in 2020 sales, Prevnar 13 was Pfizer's single-biggest product, but the shot will lose patent protection in 2026.

    The new vaccine could help the franchise going for Pfizer. By June, the FDA will decide whether to approve Pfizer's 20-valent shot for use in people 18 years and older. That's a smaller population than is authorized for Prevnar, which can be used in children and infants as young as six weeks. But Pfizer aims to eventually treat that group as well, having already published Phase 2 data for the new vaccine in infants and children.

    Merck is close behind, with a decision due July 18 for its 15-valent pneumococcal vaccine called V114 in adults 18 and older. V114 is designed to follow the company's older 23-valent shot called Pneumovax 23 and like Pfizer's new product protects against key strains that are helping drive disease.

    https://www.biopharmadive.com/news/5-fda-approvals-second-quarter-2021/597474/

    Sputnik V Twitter feed raises prospect of vaccine tourism to Russia

      Russia is working on a programme to offer people abroad the chance to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in Russia with its Sputnik V shot from July, the vaccine’s official Twitter account has said.

    Authorities have so far been sceptical about launching a programme to allow foreigners to travel to Russia for the vaccine, saying that it needed to focus on its own population.

    The two-shot vaccine is available in Russia for its own citizens or for foreigners who have a residence or temporary residence permit.

    “Sputnik V vaccination in Russia! Who’s on board?” the shot’s official English-language account wrote on Twitter on Thursday, posting a photograph of people next to a plane with Sputnik written on it.

    It invited Twitter users to follow its account, saying: “Our social media followers will be the first to be invited to get #SputnikVaccinated in Russia when the programme starts.”

    “We are working to start this programme in July,” it said.

    Russia’s RDIF sovereign wealth fund, which is marketing Sputnik V globally and which runs the Twitter account, declined to elaborate further.

    An RDIF representative said the fund would provide more details when such a programme was launched.

    “Call me Laika and get me on board in this Sputnik!” one person replied to the tweets, referring to the first Russian dog in space. Some expressed doubts about the idea because of the pace of the vaccine programme in Russia.

    Russia had produced 20.1 million doses of the Sputnik V vaccine as of March 17, while 4.3 million people out of a population of 144 million have received both shots since December.

    Health Minister Mikhail Murashko earlier ruled out the idea of foreigners travelling to Russia to get the shot while the country inoculates its own population.

    “The priority for us is the vaccination of Russian citizens ... We are not working on the topic of vaccination tourism at this stage,” Murashko’s aide Alexei Kuznetsov said.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-russia-programme/sputnik-v-twitter-feed-raises-prospect-of-vaccine-tourism-to-russia-idUSKBN2BP1EP