Search This Blog

Thursday, July 7, 2022

Prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide increasing

 




Acetaminophen Blunts Antitumor Activity of Immunotherapy

 Patients starting cancer immunotherapy with detectable levels of acetaminophen had worse outcomes, including response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), in data from three patient cohorts.

In the largest of the three studies (N=392), patients with detectable acetaminophen had a 33% lower likelihood of survival as compared with patients who did not have detectable acetaminophen at the start of treatment with nivolumab (Opdivo).

An analysis of 297 patients treated with a PD-1/L1 inhibitor (alone or in combination with a CTLA-4 inhibitor) showed about a 50% reduction in PFS and OS among patients with detectable acetaminophen. In the third study (N=34), no patient with detectable acetaminophen achieved an objective response, and both PFS and OS were numerically worse than in those without acetaminophen onboard.

Studies involving an animal model of colon cancer supported the clinical data, showing lower response rates with immunotherapy in animals pretreated with acetaminophen, reported Alban Bessede, PhD, of Explicyte, a preclinical research organization in Bordeaux, France, and coauthors, in the Annals of Oncology.

Together, the findings suggested that acetaminophen decreases T cell-mediated antitumor immunity in advanced cancer, the authors said. "It is unlikely that our data are the result of bias or unmeasured confounding."

"Our study reports the most comprehensive picture of the immunomodulatory effects of APAP [acetaminophen]," they added. "Our results confirm that more research should be performed to understand the impact of APAP on immunity and present a compelling case for caution in using this drug in cancer patients treated with ICB [immune checkpoint blockade]. Whether this rule applies at immunotherapy onset or all over the treatment duration, to all antipyretics, all regimens ... and to other immuno-oncology agents ... requires further investigations."

Compelling Evidence

As use of immuno-oncology approaches has increased, the potential for interaction with common medications has become a more relevant clinical issue, noted the authors of an accompanying editorial on what they called "important, compelling, and concerning data" in the current study.

"In all, the data supports the conclusions that APAP appears to blunt ICI (immune checkpoint inhibitor) effectiveness, perhaps through activating regulatory immune elements, namely Tregs (regulatory T cells)," wrote Pedro Berraondo, PhD, of Cima Universidad de Navarra in Pamplona, Spain, and Ryan J. Sullivan, MD, of Mass General Cancer Center in Boston.

However, they noted: "The major weakness of this analysis is the potential for confounding. While the authors attempted to limit this by performing multivariate analysis and used data from three distinct clinical trials, it is hard to tease out the effect of the fact that patients treated with APAP may be those with rose disease on some level."

Still, they said, "the central conclusion from this comprehensive work is concerning and suggests that one of the most widely used drugs in patients may mitigate the benefit of cancer immunotherapy. While this study requires validation before we radically eliminate the use of APAP in our patients, the data require all of us who treat patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors to reexamine whether our patients on APAP really need to be."

Pain is the most common symptom of patients with advanced cancer, and APAP, alone or in combination, is a first-line option for pain control, Bessede and colleagues noted.

While generally considered safe to use in patients with cancer, some prior evidence has also suggested APAP may have negative immunomodulatory effects.

For example, preclinical studies showed that APAP can inhibit immune cell proliferation and T cell-dependent antibody response. Clinical studies have produced evidence that APAP inhibits viral clearance and/or neutralizing antibody response in patients with chickenpox or rhinovirus. Additionally, randomized studies showed impaired vaccination response in pediatric patients taking APAP for fever. The CDC does not recommend use of APAP or other antipyretics before or at the time of vaccination.

Against that background evidence, the authors conducted a study to examine the effects of APAP on ICB efficacy in patients with advanced cancer. The investigation included three patient cohorts: the CheckMate 025 trial of nivolumab in advanced renal cell carcinoma and the French PREMIS and BIP studies of immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

Key Findings

The results from CheckMate 025 showed that absence of APAP was associated with a 33% reduction in the mortality hazard among patients treated with nivolumab (95% CI 0.52-0.88, P=0.004).

Data from PREMIS showed that detectable ADAP was associated with a median PFS of 2.63 months versus 5.03 months for patients without ADAP (95% CI 0.53-0.91, P=0.009) and a median OS of 8.43 vs 14.93 months (95% CI 0.32-0.69, P<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, ADAP plasma levels maintained an independent association with PFS and OS.

The BIP analysis yielded response rates of 0% versus 29.4% for patients with and without detectable ADAP levels (P=0.015). Median PFS was more than twice as long in patients without detectable ADAP (4.72 vs 1.87 months, 95% CI 0.30-1.32, P=0.219), as was median OS (16.56 vs 7.87 months, 95% CI 0.3-1.63, P=0.412), although neither difference achieved statistical significance.

In the preclinical studies, ADAP levels did not affect survival, but substantially more patients without detectable ADAP were tumor free at the end of treatment.


Disclosures

The study was supported by Conseil Regional Nouvelle Aquitaine, Fondation Bergonié, Explicyte, and Gustave Roussy.

One or more authors disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai, Deciphera, Merck, Parthenon, Roche, SpringWorks, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pharmamar, Explicyte, and Amgen.

Berraondo reported having no relevant relationships with industry. Sullivan disclosed relationships with AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Iovance, Merck, Novartis, OncoSec, and Pfizer.

Demand Rising for 'Bootlegged' Weight-Loss Drug

 Novo Nordisk's weight management drug semaglutide (Wegovy) has been in prolonged short supply due to "unprecedented demand," prompting increased -- and questionable -- interest in compounded formulations of the drug, physicians said.

Endocrinologists and obesity medicine specialists have been sounding the alarm about what they say amounts to bootleg semaglutide, concerned about safety and quality as compounders offer lower prices and easier access. Physicians say they're increasingly fielding more questions about compounded semaglutide, even as questions linger about how compounders can get around patent protections that are still in place.

"I can tell you, the consensus amongst legitimate practicing obesity endocrinology specialists is to avoid this, because it's just too much unknown," said Karl Nadolsky, DO, an endocrinologist at Spectrum Health in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

A simple internet search reveals what endocrinologists are facing. In a blog post, the Compounding Pharmacy of America states that it "has combined high-quality semaglutide with L-carnitine, a fat-mobilizing amino acid. This creates a powerful symbiosis of weight loss mechanisms that help you shed pounds at a consistent rate ... Simply visit your doctor to discuss your weight loss needs and determine if semaglutide is right for you."

An aesthetic medical center in Ohio called Cru Clinic also promotes compounded semaglutide on its site, featuring pictures of smiling patients on scales and in workout gear. It states that as an alternative to more expensive semaglutide, "We have access to semaglutide from a compounding pharmacy for on-going use" for $300 a month.

Compounded semaglutide is described as "generic semaglutide" on other sites, and is sometimes mixed with vitamin B12. Many other websites make similar pitches.

But physicians remain skeptical about compounded formulations of the drug.

Ricardo Correa, MD, EdD, endocrinology fellowship director at the University of Arizona College of Medicine in Phoenix, said compounders "are probably using the same active pharmacological part [semaglutide], but when you combine things and you add different excipients, the effectiveness -- if you don't measure that in a randomized controlled trial -- will not be the same."

Fatima Cody Stanford, MD, MPH, an obesity specialist at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, said, "My assumption would be that they're making an agent that's close," but that "I can't chance anything with my patients. I need to see the data to support the use."

Physicians' concerns about these products also may stem from memories of a 2012 outbreak of fungal meningitis tied to methylprednisolone acetate injections made by a compounding pharmacy that killed 64 patients in the U.S. and sickened nearly 800.

Subject to less stringent regulations, some said compounding pharmacies had become "de facto" small drug manufacturers, so Congress subsequently passed reforms around compounding.

Still, compounding pharmacy groups say they're within their rights to use semaglutide in products -- hypothetically speaking.

Industry trade group Alliance for Pharmacy Compounding (APC) wrote in an email to MedPage Today that semaglutide likely meets the criteria needed to be eligible for use in compounded products because it is not considered a "biologic," which can't be used in compounded drugs, and it's a component of an FDA-approved product.

But APC stopped short of acknowledging that compounding pharmacies are actually using the same substance, protected by Novo Nordisk patents, in compound substances.

"We didn't say that semaglutide powder was available to compound with, or that pharmacies should compound semaglutide, just that it IS a peptide that DOES meet the criteria," the email stated.

A spokesperson for FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) didn't rule out the possibility, either, noting that under federal law a drug used in compounding is exempt from normal FDA approval if it's "made using a bulk drug substance (active ingredient) that is a component of an FDA-approved human drug product, provided all other conditions ... are met," the spokesperson wrote. "Semaglutide is the active ingredient in an FDA-approved drug product."

APC also argued that compounders are stepping in to fill a gap in the Wegovy supply.

"The fact is, Wegovy has been on and off of manufacturer backorder, and is currently on the FDA Drug Shortage list – a distinction that means 503a compounding pharmacies MAY be able to compound it," the email stated.

The organization encouraged compounding pharmacies to seek legal counsel, however.

The FDA, too, wrote that although the law restricts compounding drugs that are "essentially a copy" of commercially available drug products, "we do not consider a drug to be commercially available when it appears on FDA's drug shortage list. Currently, we note that semaglutide (WEGOVY) injection is on the FDA Drug Shortages list."

Despite the potential loophole, Novo Nordisk -- which owns multiple patents protecting its semaglutide medicines, including diabetes drug Ozempic -- said in an email to MedPage Today that entities selling products containing semaglutide "may be infringing Novo Nordisk's intellectual property rights and/or violating applicable laws. Novo Nordisk will take such actions as it deems necessary and appropriate to protect its intellectual property rights."

Physicians also found it perplexing that compounding pharmacies would be able obtain the patented substance.

"Nobody knows how they're getting it," said Nadolsky of compounding pharmacies. "Who's making it? Novo's not giving it to them. They're the ones with the rights to the molecule, so how is anybody getting semaglutide?"

Jacob Sherkow, JD, a professor of law and medicine at the Illinois College of Medicine, told MedPage Today that most active pharmaceutical ingredients a compounding pharmacy would use aren't actually synthesized at the compounding pharmacy.

Substances are bought from outside the U.S. where chemical manufacturing is cheaper, in countries like China and Ukraine, and then mixed with inactive ingredients and put in syringes at the pharmacy, Sherkow said.

Even so, semaglutide that's "made, used, sold, offered to be sold, or imported into the United States is possibly an act of infringement, if Novo were to sue them, if they had a U.S. patent covering any of that," Sherkow said. A lawsuit, however, would cost time, money, and would be complicated by patents that may cover a "pharmaceutical formulation" -- essentially a finished product -- not the active ingredient itself, he said.

Sherkow noted that compounding pharmacies play a crucial role for patients who need them -- but they aren't without some risks.

"The vast majority of restaurants, with some -- but minimal -- oversight, handle food that is not prepared properly, and could easily poison us," he said in an analogy. "And they do it every day, millions of times a day. A compounding pharmacy is operating in a similar space."

But endocrinologists and obesity specialists reiterated they wouldn't prescribe compounded semaglutide. To them, the stakes are higher than a bout of food poisoning.

Stanford said for all of her patients, she asks herself, "'Would I be comfortable?' And if I wouldn't, myself, be comfortable receiving it, then I don't need to prescribe it for someone else."

She added, "I understand we're frustrated because we can't get the GLP-1s [glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, the drug class semaglutide falls into], but just because it's desperate times doesn't mean we use desperate measures."

Correa added that a patient asked him last week about compounded semaglutide. But that without knowing exactly what's in it and how it works, it's simply too risky for the patient -- and for him as a physician.

"You're treating 100 patients and all of them have been doing fine with a compound medication you recommend. One develops a problem." Correa said, in a hypothetical. "That's it. That's the end of your career."

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/99625

Theranos exec Sunny Balwani convicted of fraud

 Silicon Valley executive Ramesh "Sunny" Balwani has been found guilty of deceiving investors as part of a plot with ex-girlfriend Elizabeth Holmes.

He falsely and repeatedly claimed that their company, Theranos, had a device that could detect hundreds of diseases with a few drops of blood.

Holmes was found guilty at a separate trial in January where she accused Balwani of abuse - which he denies.

Both Holmes, 38, and Balwani, 57, will be sentenced by a judge in the autumn.

Holmes is facing around 20 years in prison and is currently free on bail. Balwani also faces up to 20 years in prison as well as millions of dollars in restitution payments to his victims.

Theranos was once worth $9bn (£7.5bn), but was based on blood testing technology that did not work.


The verdict was read on the fifth day of jury deliberations at a courthouse in San Jose, California, in the heart of Silicon Valley. Balwani was found guilty of all 12 charges against him.

During closing arguments on 21 June, prosecutors showed text messages sent by Balwani to Holmes.


"I am responsible for everything at Theranos," he wrote in 2015. "All have been my decisions too."

Assistant US Attorney Jeffrey Schenk called the message an admission of guilt. "He's acknowledging his role in the fraud," he said.


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61902378

Judge Strikes Down Los Angeles School Vaccine Mandate, Siding With Parent

 by Bill Pan via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A plan to mandate COVID-19 vaccine shots for hundreds of thousands of students in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) will remain on pause after a Los Angeles County judge ruled on July 5 that the district lacks the authority to do so.

In his ruling, Judge Mitchell Beckloff of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County sided with a parent, whose 12-year-old son attends a public magnet school in North Hollywood. The parent filed the complaint in October 2021, about a month after the LAUSD announced its vaccination mandate.

Under the district’s mandate, all eligible students aged 12 and above must show proof of COVID-19 vaccination, or get approved for exemptions by Jan. 10 in order to attend school in person. Those who don’t comply would be transferred into the district’s remote learning program, City of Angels, which offers a mixture of live instruction and self-study.

The suing parent, identified as G.F., argued that it is unfair and unlawful for the child, identified as D.F., to have to lose his hard-earned place at a competitive school just because he and his parent have chosen to not get vaccinated on the basis of personal beliefs.

According to G.F., his son had acquired natural immunity after recovering from COVID-19. He also said he worried that vaccinating the child would put the child’s health in jeopardy.

Either I get him a vaccine that I fear could harm him, or I send him to a virtual school that I know from experience and LAUSD’s own data would prove academically vastly inferior,” the father said earlier this year in a sworn declaration, reported City News Service. “The idea of dumping him into an online school, free of a rigorous academic program and torn away from his like-minded classmates, breaks my heart.”

Beckloff, who wrote in March in a tentative opinion that he might dismiss the case, agreed with the father in his final ruling, acknowledging that if D.F. refuses to comply with the mandate, he will be forced to accept a very different education.

“The [mandate] is not merely about how education is delivered or who may be physically present on campus as the court previously viewed it. Instead, the [mandate] dictates which school the student may attend, and the curriculum he may continue to receive,” the judge wrote, reported the Los Angeles Times.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/judge-strikes-down-los-angeles-school-vaccine-mandate-siding-parent

ImmuPharma Shares Rise on Formal Meeting Confirmation With FDA Over Lupuzor

 ImmuPharma PLC shares rose Thursday after it said that Avion Pharmaceuticals--its U.S. partner for its Lupuzor lupus treatment--has received a Type C Meeting confirmation from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

A Type C meeting concerns the development and review of certain products.

The London-listed biopharmaceutical company said that the statement of purpose, objectives and proposed agenda of the meeting have already been agreed on, as has the option to provide written responses, rather than face-to-face meetings. The FDA has agreed to provide a written response by Aug. 29.

ImmuPharma said on June 27 that Avion was seeking final regulatory guidance from the FDA as it prepares for the start of the international Phase 3 trial of Lupuzor. It said then that Lupuzor has met all of the FDA's requirements so far, including all key endpoints in prior trials.

"We applaud the quick turnaround from the FDA in respect to Avion's request for this Type C Meeting and pleased to note the FDA's confirmation that only a written response is required and no face to face meeting is needed," Chief Executive Tim McCarthy said.

Bayer, BASF win new trial on $60 million damage award in weedkiller lawsuit

 

Bayer AG and BASF have won a new trial on $60 million in punitive damages they were ordered to pay a Missouri peach farmer who said dicamba, a herbicide they produced, drifted onto his orchard and harmed his crops.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that a federal jury was wrongly told to assess punitive damages for Bayer and BASF together, rather than separately. It said a new trial was needed to determine punitive damages for each company.

Bayer, BASF and a lawyer for the farmer, Bill Bader, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The order does not affect the jury's verdict that the companies are responsible, and leaves in place its award of $15 million in actual, non-punitive damages.

The jury had originally awarded $250 million in punitive damages, for a total verdict of $265 million, but a federal judge later slashed the punitive portion to $60 million, bringing the total down to $75 million.

Bader's lawsuit, one of more than 100 similar lawsuits over dicamba, went to trial in early 2020. Bayer in June 2020 announced that it would pay up to $400 million to settle the remaining dicamba lawsuits.

Bader, who operates Missouri's largest peach orchard near the Arkansas border, said many trees were killed when dicamba drifted onto his property from nearby soybean and cotton farms.

Monsanto, which is now owned by Bayer, began selling dicamba-tolerant soybean and cotton seeds it developed in 2015 and 2016, respectively, leading to an explosion of dicamba use, Bader and other farmers have said.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency imposed restrictions on the use of dicamba in November 2018 over concerns about potential damage to nearby crops.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/BASF-SE-6443227/news/Bayer-BASF-win-new-trial-on-60-million-damage-award-in-weedkiller-lawsuit-40923275/