Search This Blog

Monday, June 3, 2024

Agios Phase 3 Met Primary, All Key Secondary Endpoints in Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia

 

  • Study Achieved the Primary Endpoint; Mitapivat Demonstrated a Statistically Significant Transfusion Reduction Response Compared to Placebo
  • Statistical Significance Achieved for All Key Secondary Endpoints Evaluating Additional Measures of Reduction of Transfusion Burden Compared to Placebo
  • ENERGIZE-T is the First Phase 3 Study to Demonstrate Efficacy of an Oral, Disease-Modifying Treatment for Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- and Beta-Thalassemia
  • As Part of Global Submission Strategy, U.S. Marketing Application for Mitapivat in Thalassemia Based on ENERGIZE and ENERGIZE-T Studies to be Submitted by End of 2024
  • Agios to Host Investor Webcast Event Today at 8:00 a.m. ET

Agios plans to present a more detailed analysis of the Phase 3 ENERGIZE-T data at an upcoming medical meeting. Data from the Phase 3 ENERGIZE study of mitapivat in non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia will be presented at the European Hematology Association 2024 Hybrid Congress in a plenary session on June 15, 2024, and in a poster session on June 14, 2024.

Conference Call Information

Agios will host a webcast investor event today at 8:00 a.m. ET to review the ENERGIZE-T Phase 3 data and next steps for the mitapivat development program in thalassemia. The event can be accessed under “Events & Presentations” in the Investors and Media section of the company's website at www.agios.com. The archived webcast will be available on the company's website beginning approximately two hours after the event.

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/agios-announces-phase-3-energize-t-study-of-mitapivat-met-primary-endpoint-and-all-key-secondary-endpoints-in-adults-with-transfusion-dependent-alpha-or-beta-thalassemia/

Kalvista Data on Persisting Unmet Needs in Hereditary Angioedema

 KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: KALV), today announced that it presented real-world data from US patient surveys that assessed the experience of HAE patients using injectable on-demand treatments at the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Congress 2024 that took place in Valencia, Spain.

The following presentations occurred at EAACI 2024:

  • Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Patients Answer: Why Do Attacks Go Untreated? Cristine Radojicic, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. (Flash Talks Session)
    • For 50% of US survey respondents with HAE, their untreated attack progressed in severity while 25% of attacks migrated to other anatomic locations including the throat
    • Common reasons for not treating were desire to save injectable on-demand treatment for a severe attack, presumption the attack would stay mild, wanting to avoid needle pain or injection burning, stinging, or pain, and not having on-demand treatment with them
  • Delayed On-demand Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks: Patient Perceptions and Associated Barriers Rashmi Jain, Consultant in Clinical Immunology, Oxford University Hospital Trust, Oxford, UK. (Poster presentation)
    • 63% of UK survey participants reported their perception of time to treatment for HAE attacks as “early” despite only 14% treating in less than one hour
    • Common barriers to early on-demand treatment included the belief that the attack was going to remain mild and wanting to save injectable on-demand treatment for a severe attack
  • Anxiety Associated with On-Demand Treatment for Hereditary Angioedema Attacks Patrick Yong, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK. (Poster presentation)
    • Almost half of UK survey participants reported moderate to extreme anxiety when anticipating use of injectable on-demand therapy to treat an attack
    • Top reasons for feeling anxious were desire not to ‘waste’ on-demand treatment, uncertainty about how long the treatment would take to begin working, and finding a vein for IV infusion
  • Patient-Reported Benefits of Early On-demand Treatment of HAE Attacks Hilary Longhurst, Auckland City Hospital, Te Toka Tumai, and University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. (Poster presentation)
    • Results from this analysis highlight that survey respondents with HAE who treat their attacks early (<1 hour) are more likely to carry their on-demand treatment with them and treat more attacks overall compared with those who delay treatment (90.3% vs. 72.6%)
    • People living with HAE who treat their attacks early also recover more quickly from HAE attacks (1.4 hours vs 2.9 hours for those who waited ≥1 hour to treat), achieve full recovery earlier (1.3 vs 1.9 days), and feel less anxious when anticipating on-demand treatment
  • Treatment of HAE Attacks with Anticipated Future Oral On-demand Therapies as Reported by Patients Anna Valerieva, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria. (Poster presentation)
    • Survey respondents reported that they anticipated carrying an oral on-demand treatment 95.1% of the time compared with 63.9% with parenteral on-demand treatment; they would treat 88.5% of their attacks with an oral on-demand treatment compared with 80.3% with parenteral on-demand treatment
    • Of the respondents who thought they would treat attacks earlier with a pill vs. an injectable, 80% reported that they would have less anxiety when anticipating using an oral on-demand treatment
  • Attack Characteristics in Patients with Hereditary Angioedema Receiving Non-Androgen Long-term Prophylaxis William Lumry, Allergy and Asthma Research Associates, Dallas, Texas, United States. (Flash Talks session)
    • In patients using non-androgen LTP, 68% of patients reported their most recent attack as moderate to very severe; 19.6% of these attacks involved laryngeal swelling and 12% required an ER visit or hospitalization
    • Only 55% of patients reported all their attacks to their physicians, which may have resulted in underestimation of attacks while receiving non-androgen LTP
  • Unmet Needs Associated with Non-androgen Long-term Prophylaxis (LTP) Therapies for HAE William Lumry, Allergy and Asthma Research Associates, Dallas, Texas, United States. (Poster presentation)
    • Despite the availability of non-androgen LTPs, their use is associated with a high treatment burden
    • Lack of efficacy and gastrointestinal issues were the most common issues reported by physicians for patients using oral LTP; route of administration, discomfort, and frequent dosing schedule were the most common issues reported by physicians for patients using injectable LTPs
  • A Sensitive and Specific Assay to Characterize Plasma Kallikrein Activity in Plasma from Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Patients: Daniel Lee, KalVista Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA. (Oral Abstract Session)
    • Outlines substantial progress on a sensitive and specific PKa assay that could be useful to characterize the level of PKa activity in plasma samples from PKa-mediated diseases, including patients diagnosed with HAE with normal C1 esterase inhibitor (nC1-INH-HAE)

Edwards Lifesciences to Sell Critical Care to BD

 Edwards Lifesciences (NYSE: EW) today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Critical Care product group to BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) (NYSE: BDX), in an all-cash transaction valued at $4.2 billion. With this agreement, Edwards is no longer pursuing the previously announced spin-off of Critical Care.

Edwards will use the after-tax cash proceeds to fund strategic growth investments. The sale enhances Edwards’ balance sheet flexibility for disciplined investments in technologies for aortic, mitral, tricuspid and pulmonic patients, as well as new therapeutic areas for interventional heart failure. Edwards’ goal is to build the most comprehensive structural heart disease portfolio through its pursuit of breakthrough technologies, indication expansions and world-class evidence for its surgical, TAVR and transcatheter mitral and tricuspid innovations, with the focus on helping even more patients around the world.

“Edwards’ underlying rationale for separating Critical Care remains the same: we are laser focused on pursuing a strategy centered on structural heart disease,” said Bernard Zovighian, Edwards’ CEO. “Our goal is to serve large unmet patient needs with our differentiated innovations while extending our global leadership, delivering sustainable growth and increasing shareholder value. Critical Care has made significant contributions to our company and has a long history of pioneering innovation. We believe this transaction will strengthen Edwards, Critical Care and BD, paving the way for both companies to deliver even greater value to patients.”

Critical Care will operate in Irvine, CA, and will be led by Katie Szyman, who is currently the corporate vice president of Critical Care for Edwards.

The transaction is expected to close by the end of 2024, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain closing conditions, including the receipt of required antitrust and foreign investment approvals. If it closes as expected, the impact to adjusted earnings per share (EPS) in 2024 would be immaterial. Other terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/edwards-lifesciences-to-sell-critical-care-to-bd/

Annexon Tackles Guillain-Barre, Other Inflammatory Diseases with Novel Antibody

 This quarter, Annexon Biosciences expects to release Phase III trial results from its flagship program for Guillain-Barre syndrome. At the same time, the company is looking beyond GBS and investigating the possibility of fighting other inflammation-driven diseases with the antibody, ANX005.

Historically, GBS has been difficult to treat and understand due to a relative lack of understanding around the cause of the disease. With causative associations ranging from viral infections to surgeries, GBS is a rare autoimmune disease affecting approximately 12,000 people in the U.S. and Europe each year. It can debilitate patients by paralyzing peripheral nerves in the limbs.

There is currently no curative or long-term treatment for GBS, although intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg, available as a generic from multiple companies) and plasmapheresis are used for acute bouts of the disease.

As a pooled antibody from human blood sources, IVIg does not lead to better outcomes in subsequent administrations for GBS after the first dose due to poor prognosis, a 2021 randomized controlled study found. The study found that compared with placebo, patients who received a second IVIg dose had more serious adverse events such as thromboembolic events.

By contrast, plasmapheresis is a procedure that uses a machine to separate plasma from blood cells, then replaces the patient’s plasma before returning the blood to the body. In doing so, plasmapheresis removes antibodies in the plasma, easing the inflammation characteristic of GBS. But the procedure requires access to a central line via catheters and carries a risk of bleeding and infections.

ANX005’s mechanism is different: it inhibits a protein complex called C1q that is part of the classical complement pathway, which is in turn a component of the innate immune system. ANX005 thus targets the classical complement pathway upstream while—unlike IVIg—leaving the lectin pathway and the alternative complement pathway intact. In other words, patients treated with ANX005 will still be able to activate C3 via the lectin pathway and the alternative complement pathway, but not the classical complement pathway. This mechanism likely leads to less immunosuppression than does IVIg, enabling the body to continue defending itself against pathogens.  

In Phase Ib trials, ANX005 was administered along with IVIg in an open-label treatment arm to GBS patients. But in Phase III trials, Annexon is betting on comparing two different ANX005 doses compared to placebo. As this trial’s primary endpoints measure the GBS Disability Score at eight weeks and look at the number of patients with adverse effects for six months, there is much at stake in terms of safety and efficacy.

By targeting GBS from a new angle, ANX005 is offering hope in a therapeutic area where corticosteroids and interferon-beta 1a have failed in the past.

Beyond GBS

While Annexon continues to assemble data on its Phase III GBS trial for upcoming release, it is also moving toward testing C1q inhibition in other inflammatory diseases, and these trials provide additional information about its safety profile.

Huntington’s disease, a progressive movement disorder, is also driven by the activation of the classical complement pathway. Based on Phase IIa safety data from its Huntington’s disease trial with ANX005, ANX005’s adverse effect profile is limited to mainly infusion-site reactions that appear only upon the first dose, making it safer than IVIg for these patients.

By contrast, with various side effects that appear even with the first dose such as chills, fever, flushing, flu-like muscle pains or joint pains, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and rash, IVIg is only used when necessary to boost immune responses due to systemic adverse effects.

With ANX005 also being investigated for use in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), where the drugmaker aims to reduce disease progression, there are certainly exciting developments ahead for Annexon in the coming months.

https://www.biospace.com/article/opinion-annexon-tackles-guillain-barre-other-inflammatory-diseases-with-novel-antibody/

FDA Action Alert: Catalyst, GSK, BMS, More

 The FDA is welcoming June with four target action dates in the coming two weeks, including one to expand the patient pool for a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. The regulator will also hold two big advisory committee meetings.

Read below for more.

Catalyst Seeks Higher Maximum Daily Dose for Rare Disease Drug

By June 4, the FDA is set to release its verdict on Catalyst Pharmaceuticals’ supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA), proposing a higher maximum daily dose of its potassium channel blocker Firdapse (amifampridine) for the treatment for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS).

Caused by an autoimmune error where antibodies attack the patients’ own calcium channels, LEMS is rare neuromuscular disorder that manifests as weakness of the limbs. LEMS is also often linked to an underlying cancer, most commonly small-cell lung cancer. In some patients, LEMS manifests as the first sign of these cancers.

The exact mechanism by which Firdapse treats LEMS is still unknown, according to its label.

The FDA first approved Firdapse in November 2018 on the basis of two Phase III studies demonstrating that the drug could elicit significantly greater improvements in muscle strength and physical wellbeing than placebo. Firdapse’s most common side effects include a prickling sensation, upper respiratory tract infection and abdominal pain. The drug’s label was expanded in 2022 to include pediatric patients.

Currently, Firdapse can be given at a maximum daily dose of 80 mg. With its sNDA, which the FDA accepted in October 2023, Catalyst is hoping to increase this limit to 100 mg.

Lykos Therapeutics’ MDMA-Assisted PTSD Therapy Faces Adcomm

On June 4, the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee will convene to discuss Lykos Therapeutics’ MDMA-assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder.

CEO Amy Emerson said in May 2024 that Lykos’ application will be the “first MDMA-assisted therapy and psychedelic-assisted therapy to be reviewed by the Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee,” adding that the meeting itself is a “significant milestone in the field of psychedelic medicine.”

Lykos is proposing to use MDMA tablets in conjunction with psychotherapy and supportive mental health interventions for PTSD. The biotech is backing its application with data from the Phase III MAPP1 and MAPP2 studies, which showed significant improvements in patients’ scores in the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, currently the gold standard in PTSD symptom evaluation.

Last month, however, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) flagged anomalies in Lykos’ study design, pointing out that therapists and patients recruited into the study already held “very strong prior beliefs” about MDMA, which could have skewed the documentation of treatment benefits.

ICER also noted that some participants were pressured to keep the results of Lykos’ studies “favorable.” Moreover, due to the psychedelic effects of MDMA, nearly all patients who received the active treatment could identify their assignment, making the study “essentially, unblinded.”

GSK Eyes Expanded Label for RSV Vaccine

GSK is proposing to use its respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine Arexvy to inoculate people aged 50 to 59 who are at an increased risk of the infection. The FDA’s decision is due on June 7.

If approved, Arexvy would become the first RSV vaccine approved to protect this age group against the virus, helping GSK to maintain its lead in the RSV race.

Arexvy became the first FDA-approved RSV vaccine in May 2023, and is currently authorized for use in adults aged 60 years and above. The vaccine has since become the RSV market leader. In its third-quarter 2023 report, GSK revealed that Arexvy had captured more than 60% of retail RSV vaccinations in the U.S. and brought in nearly $860 million in its first full commercial quarter.

GSK is backing Arexvy’s supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) with a Phase III study that looked at the immune response and safety of the vaccine in a younger senior population. The pharma unveiled early data from this trial in October 2023, showing that the shot could elicit an immune response in people in their 50s that was non-inferior to that in its currently approved patient population.

Aside from immunogenicity, the late-stage study also found that Arexvy’s safety and reactogenicity profiles were consistent with what had been determined in prior trials. The most common side effects were headache, pain and fatigue.

Ipsen, Genfit Propose Elafibranor for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

The FDA has until June 10 to decide on Ipsen and Genfit’s NDA for their dual peroxisome–activated receptor alpha/delta (PPAR α,δ) agonist elafibranor for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

If approved, elafibranor could “change the management of this challenging condition . . . offering a new second-line treatment choice, where the number of effective options are currently limited,” Christelle Huguet, head of R&D at Ipsen, said in a statement announcing the NDA’s acceptance. The FDA has granted elafibranor priority review.

PBC is a rare autoimmune liver disease characterized by the progressive destruction of the bile ducts, which in turn impairs the body’s ability to clear toxins. Patients with PBC typically experience fatigue and itch and eventually develop cirrhosis. When left unchecked, PBC can also lead to liver failure and death.

Elafibranor is an orally available small molecule drug candidate that works by boosting lipid metabolism. Elafibranor can also reduce inflammation, fibrosis and steatosis, all of which are hallmarks of PBC. It was originally being developed for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, but those plans were scrapped due to disappointing Phase III data.

In November 2023, Ipsen and Genfit published data from the Phase III ELATE trial demonstrating that the drug candidate can elicit high rates of biochemical response in PBC patients. Elafibranor also normalized alkaline phosphatase levels in a subset of treated patients.

FDA’s PCNS Adcomm Convenes to Discuss Lilly’s Donanemab

On June 10, the FDA will convene its Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee to discuss Eli Lilly’s application for its anti-amyloid antibody donanemab for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.

According to a March 2024 announcement, the panel of external experts will focus on the “unique trial design” of Lilly’s TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 study, and the potential implications of this design on the trial’s efficacy findings.

In TRAILBLAZER ALZ-2, Lilly enrolled more than 1,700 patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease, as diagnosed with cognitive screening and brain scans. The trial’s treatment protocol was unique in that it allowed patients to stop donanemab treatment after amyloid clumps in their brains had dropped below a pre-defined level.

This novel trial design may have cost donanemab accelerated approval, which the FDA rejected in January 2023. At the time, the regulator noted that it needed to see data from at least 100 patients who had been treated with donanemab for 12 or more consecutive months.

The donanemab meeting comes as the FDA mulls eliminating the adcomm vote entirely, instead favoring a “more comprehensive discussion” regarding the issues surrounding the product in question, Commissioner Robert Califf said during the 2023 Biopharma Congress meeting.

BMS Awaits FDA Verdict for Agutyro in NTRK-Positive Solid Tumors

Bristol Myers Squibb is seeking a label expansion for its tyrosine kinase inhibitor Augtyro (repotrectinib), which the pharma wants to use in patients 12 years and above with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors carrying the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion. The FDA has set a target action date of June 15. 

In its sNDA, which the FDA accepted and granted priority review in February 2024, BMS included data from the Phase I/II TRIDENT-1 study, which showed that Augtyro can elicit “clinically meaningful response rates” in patients. The response was durable, even in patients who had common resistance mutations.

The pharma also provided findings from the CARE study, which supplemented TRIDENT-1 with promising data from pediatric patients and young adults whose tumors had ALK, ROS1 or NTRK mutations.

Augtyro is an oral drug that works by blocking the proto-oncogene ROS1, as well as various tyrosine kinases. According to its label, his mechanism of action allows Augtyro to block fusion proteins containing ROS1 domains, which would otherwise trigger signaling cascades that culminate in the uncontrolled proliferation of cancer cells.

Augtyro was first approved in November 2023 for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients positive for ROS1.

https://www.biospace.com/article/fda-action-alert-catalyst-gsk-bms-and-more/