Search This Blog

Monday, June 3, 2024

After trial, investors weigh Trump 2.0 factor as election looms

 Donald Trump last week became the first former president convicted of a felony, but Wall Street believes he still has a solid chance of winning the November election and is gaming out how a second term for the Republican candidate could impact markets.

Investors said a Trump victory could broadly boost the stock market and buoy the dollar. But his proposed tariffs and extended tax cuts could also stoke inflation and hurt U.S. government bonds, they said.

Market participants said it remained too early to gauge how Trump's election prospects will be affected by his conviction for falsifying documents to cover up a payment to silence a porn star. The verdict, which Trump said he would appeal - does not prevent the former president from campaigning or taking office if he wins the election.

Recent polls showed U.S. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump nearly tied in the presidential race, which some believe could be swayed by macroeconomic factors as much as political ones.

The options market continues to price a pickup in volatility around the vote, suggesting investors are bracing for political uncertainty.

Here is an early look at how investors think Trump 2.0 might affect stocks, bonds and currencies.

STOCKS

The S&P 500 rose 68% through Trump’s first term, which was marked by tax cuts and infrastructure spending as well as a trade war with China and the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The benchmark index is up 38% so far under Biden.

An analysis by LPL Financial on Friday showed the S&P 500, which is up about 9% year-to-date, has risen alongside Trump’s election odds this year, as measured by betting site Predictit. At the same time, Biden's election odds have remained negatively correlated to the S&P 500 since February, the study showed.

Some investors believe a second Trump term could be supportive for equities, especially if Trump is able to avert tax hikes promised by Biden. Much would depend on the makeup of Congress.

"In a Trump administration with a divided Congress or with a Republican clean sweep, we can say, a corporate tax hike is off the table," said Sonu Varghese, global macro strategist at Carson Group.

A second Trump White House would also seek to reduce the power of U.S. financial regulators, according to a Reuters report. That could be another positive for stocks, especially small cap companies, which may find it more expensive to comply with regulatory requirements, wrote Stephen Auth, chief investment officer, equities at Federated Hermes.

Trump's promise to support fossil fuel production and a relatively more business-friendly approach to environmental regulation could also boost sentiment in the energy sector, a Nomura report said.

Tariffs and trade wars, however, are potential spoilers.

Trump has floated the idea of tariffs of 60% or higher on all Chinese goods and a 10% across-the-board tariffs on goods from all points of origin in a bid to eliminate the U.S. trade deficit.

Deutsche Bank analysts said trade protectionism could act as a “negative supply shock,” raising revenues at the expense of weaker growth and higher inflation.

Multinational companies deriving revenues from China or with deep supply chain links there could also be vulnerable, Carson's Varghese said.

Trump campaign National Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that his “pro growth, anti-inflation economic policies will quickly bring down prices, reduce interest rates, and lower long-term debt levels, which will benefit all Americans, including investors.”

Meanwhile, at least one stock appeared to have an immediate reaction to Trump’s conviction: shares of Trump Media & Technology Group, majority owned by Trump, fell 5% in on Friday.

BONDS AND RATES

Republicans, as well as Democrats, have vowed to reduce deficit spending and debt levels. But Trump policies such as extended tax cuts could contribute to the yawning U.S. fiscal deficit and push up inflation, investors said.

That, in turn, may hurt demand for U.S. debt, pressuring bond prices and driving up yields.

Trump’s tax proposals “would be a big drain on revenues, and I think the bond market wouldn’t react well to that," said John Velis, FX and macro strategist for the Americas at BNY Mellon.

Inflation and fiscal expansion could lead the Fed to raise interest rates, another path to higher yields, analysts at Nomura said.

Trump's tariff policies could also hurt demand for U.S. debt among foreign investors, said Christopher Hodge, chief economist for the United States at Natixis. Foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries surged to a record high of $8.09 trillion in March, rising for a sixth straight month, data from the Treasury Department showed earlier this month.

CURRENCIES

The dollar fell about 10% against a basket of currencies during Trump’s first term. But Trump’s presidency also featured a two-year period that saw the dollar gain about 15%, boosted in-part by safe-haven demand in the face of trade policy worries.

Politico reported in April that economic advisors close to Trump were debating ways to devalue the U.S. currency, a move that could buoy U.S. exports but also spark an inflationary rebound and endanger the dollar’s position as the world’s dominant currency.

Some investors, however, believe the dollar could find support if Trump’s policies lead to higher U.S. interest rates and stronger growth.

"Between elevated U.S. interest rates and tariffs, a Trump presidency could very well keep the dollar stronger for longer," said Jonathan Petersen, senior markets economist at Capital Economics.

Increased trade tariffs could also spell volatility for currencies such as the Mexican peso and Chinese yuan, which experienced big swings during Trump’s first term, Petersen said. Smaller European currencies including the Swedish krona and Polish zloty could also be affected, since they are particularly sensitive to risk sentiment and likely to be impacted by potential tariffs, he said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/analysis-trial-investors-weigh-trump-050333227.html

'NYSE glitch sends Berkshire Hathaway shares down nearly 100%'

 The New York Stock Exchange on Monday said it is investigating a technical problem that has Class A shares of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway seemingly down almost 100%.

The issue prompted trading to be halted in Berkshire's A-class shares, along with about a dozen other companies, including Barrick Gold and Nuscale Power, both of which also showed faulty and steep declines. Trading continued in Berkshire's B-class shares.

The trouble arose shortly after the opening bell, impacting the likes of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Abbott Laboratories and other stocks.

The NYSE said in a 10:11 a.m. Eastern Time post on its website that it was assessing the issue related to the index's so-called limit up-limit down bands, mechanisms that control when stocks are paused for volatility.

Nearly an hour later, the exchange followed with an update attributing the problem to a technical issue linked to the limit bands and noting that the glitch had halted trading in a number of stocks.

"Impacted stocks have since reopened (or are in the process of reopening) and the price bands issue has been resolved," NYSE said.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nyse-investigating-technical-issue-affecting-150901687.html

Economy Starting To Look More Recessionary?

 by Simon White, Bloomberg macro strategist,

The manufacturing ISM slipped lower again in May, and came in below expectations. Yields have decided to ignore the more upbeat message from the earlier PMI reading - which beat the consensus and remains above 50 – and are lower across the curve.

The ISM has only once been above 50 since November 2022 (in March this year).

The PMI has been more upbeat of late, spending all of this year at 50 or above.

But that may be quite short-lived. The new orders-to-inventory ratio for the PMI, which leads the headline index by about three months, has been weakening (although it steadied in May).

The same ratio is also weakening for the ISM, and for that survey this has so far proven correct. The ratio is also under one for both surveys.

This may be a blip, and indeed global liquidity conditions suggest the ISM should start turning up again later in the year. But as both surveys show surface and underlying weakness, it makes sense to ready for an economy that could start to look more recessionary in the coming months, even if an actual downturn (assuming there is one) is avoided until late in the year.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/economy-starting-look-more-recessionary

ISM Manufacturing New Orders and Backlogs in Steep Contraction

The Manufacturing ISM was in contraction for 16 months went positive for a month and is contracting again for two months with order backlogs falling for 20 months.

ISM chart and excerpts below by permission from the Institute for Supply Management® ISM®

Please consider the May 2024 Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business® emphasis mine.

Economic activity in the manufacturing sector contracted in May for the second consecutive month and the 18th time in the last 19 months, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest Manufacturing ISM® Report On Business®.

The report was issued today by Timothy R. Fiore, CPSM, C.P.M., Chair of the Institute for Supply Management® (ISM®) Manufacturing Business Survey Committee.

“U.S. manufacturing activity continued in contraction after growing in March, the first expansion for the sector since September 2022. Demand was soft again, output was stable, and inputs stayed accommodative. Demand slowing was reflected by the (1) New Orders Index dropping deeper into contraction, 2) New Export Orders Index edging back into marginal expansion, (3) Backlog of Orders Index regressing lower into contraction territory, and (4) Customers’ Inventories Index at the ‘just right’ level, neutral for future production.

The New Orders Index remained in contraction territory, registering 45.4 percent, 3.7 percentage points lower than the 49.1 percent recorded in April. The May reading of the Production Index (50.2 percent) is 1.1 percentage points lower than April’s figure of 51.3 percent. The Prices Index registered 57 percent, down 3.9 percentage points compared to the reading of 60.9 percent in April. The Backlog of Orders Index registered 42.4 percent, down 3 percentage points compared to the 45.4 percent recorded in April. The Employment Index registered 51.1 percent, up 2.5 percentage points from April’s figure of 48.6 percent.

Respondent Comments (Emphasis Mine)

  • “Seems like a minor slowdown is happening. With less spending in the economy, less pressure on us for our products.” [Chemical Products]
  • “Business conditions are pacing with budget and forecast for 2024. Certain markets are soft, but others are ahead of forecast, allowing us to maintain overall. Concerns with the economy continue to drive business decisions.” [Transportation Equipment]
  • “Volume continues to be challenging, mostly due to inflationary impacts.” [Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products]
  • “Orders have started to rebound, but inventory levels remain high enough for no impact on our supplier orders. It will take a few more strong months before supplier orders are reactivated or increased.” [Computer & Electronic Products]
  • “Backlog is dwindling as we get caught up on orders; new orders are not coming in as robust as the backlog is going down. Inflation continues to be a problem with pricing of raw material and interest rates. We expect a flat rest of calendar year 2024, especially given that it’s a presidential election year.” [Machinery]
  • “Export shipments continue to be soft as capital equipment sales remain lower than forecast. As a result, production is also trending lower and inventory that is not able to be pushed out is growing.” [Fabricated Metal Products]
  • “Demand has been strong the first few months — ahead of budget, consistent with last year. Bookings are starting to slow down for May and June. We are monitoring this data closely to determine if it is a sign of decline or our typical cyclical demand.” [Electrical Equipment, Appliances & Components]
  • “Business is picking up, with incoming bookings increasing.” [Furniture & Related Products]
  • “Overall softening of markets for the month of June. Some impacts on a regional basis with the continued weather in the northeast, south and southeast regions. Delays in shipments continue across multiple regions.” [Petroleum & Coal Products]
  • “General concern about overall industry economics. Pricing weakness continues, and we anticipate more headwinds in the coming months for spot orders and inflation. Contract order book remains steady.” [Primary Metals]

There are some positive comments but concerns about softening and inflation dominate.

New Orders

The New Orders Index hasn’t indicated consistent growth since a 24-month streak of expansion ended in May 2022. “Of the six largest manufacturing sectors, one (Chemical Products) reported increased new orders. Panelists indicated that the months of April and May experienced a slowing compared to the beginning of the year as housing, construction and capital expenditures activity continue to underperform,” says Fiore.

Employment

ISM®’s Employment Index registered 51.1 percent in May, 2.5 percentage points higher than the April reading of 48.6 percent. “The index indicated employment expanded after seven consecutive months of contraction. Of the six big manufacturing sectors, three (Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; Transportation Equipment; and Chemical Products) expanded employment in May. Many Business Survey Committee respondents’ companies are continuing to reduce head counts through layoffs (which accounted for 38 percent of reduction activity, down from 50 percent in April), attrition and hiring freezes. Panelists’ comments in May indicated an increase in staff reductions compared to April. The approximately 1-to-1 ratio of hiring versus reduction comments is consistent with activity from November 2023 through March,” says Fiore. An Employment Index above 50.3 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on manufacturing employment.

Input Prices

The ISM® Prices Index registered 57 percent, 3.9 percentage points lower compared to the April reading of 60.9 percent, indicating raw materials prices increased in May for the fifth month after eight consecutive months of decreases. Of the six largest manufacturing industries, five — Machinery; Chemical Products; Computer & Electronic Products; Food, Beverage & Tobacco Products; and Fabricated Metal Products — reported price increases in May. “The Prices Index indicated strong expansion in May, but also easing compared to the previous month. Commodity prices continue to increase, especially fuel, natural gas, aluminum and plastics. Steel is showing signs of weakness. Twenty-six percent of companies reported higher prices in May, compared to 31 percent in April,” says Fiore. A Prices Index above 52.8 percent, over time, is generally consistent with an increase in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Producer Price Index for Intermediate Materials.

Order Backlogs

ISM®’s Backlog of Orders Index registered 42.4 percent, down 3 percentage points from the 45.4 percent reported in April, indicating order backlogs contracted for the 20th consecutive month after a 27-month period of expansion. Only one of the six largest manufacturing industries (Chemical Products) reported expanded order backlogs in May. “The index remained in contraction in May, as new order rates were insufficient to allow backlogs to grow,” says Fiore.

More Economic Weakening

The ISM report suggests more weakening of the economy, with a small hint of stagflation.

The ISM is a diffusion index where direction matters more than amount. For example, a firm hiring 2 people will offset another laying off 200.

This is soft data, but it is consistent with overall weakening shown in hard data.

I believe we are headed for recession this year, but we are not there yet in the first quarter.

Odds of a a recession in the second quarter are increasing.

For discussion, please see Philadelphia Fed GDPplus Revised Significantly Lower, But No Recession Yet

https://mishtalk.com/economics/ism-manufacturing-new-orders-and-backlogs-in-steep-contraction

After Berkshire Crashes To 0, NYSE Says "Technical Issue Has Been Resolved", All Systems Operational

 Update (12:02pm ET): After a cascade of circuit breakers pushed various NYSE stocks and instantly halted trading, the Exchange said in an email that the technical issue with industrywide price bands published by the CTA SIP has been resolved and all systems are currently operational.

  • All impacted stocks have reopened
  • Price band issue has been resolved
  • Issue triggered trading halts in a number of NYSE listed stocks

* * *

Something snapped just after 9:40 am, when as the market was still reeling from the latest idiotic move in meme stonks, we just saw one of the world's largest companies - Berkshire Hathaway - wipe out just about 100% of its value and crash to basically zero...

... amid a cascading wave of trading halts sparked by a break at the NYSE:

  • *MULTIPLE NYSE STOCKS SHOWING VOLATILITY TRADING HALTS

... which the exchange quickly admitted it was at fault for.

  • *NYSE EQUITIES INVESTIGATING REPORTED TECHNICAL ISSUE

The full list of halts can be found on the NYSE site and includes the following names:

Among other notable names that crashed and were halted on a Limit Up, Limit Down Circuit breaker were Chiptole, BMO, NuScale.

And while we wait to learn what exactly caused today's "market break" which may have just afforded us a glimpse of true market values, we can only reminds readers of the immortal words of the Big Lebowski:

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/market-breaks-multiple-nyse-trading-halts-see-berkshire-wipe-out-100-its-market-cap

"Geopolitical Risk Is Everywhere"

 By Michael Every of Rabobank

Two kinds of Stag Do/No-Bucks Night

We are all invited to two different kinds of ‘Stag Do’ (for those in the US, Bachelor Party), which (for those in Australia) are also a ‘No-Bucks Night’.

April US personal consumption income and spending data on Friday saw the former up 0.3% m-o-m as expected, but spending 0.2%, a tick lower, and real personal spending -0.1% vs. 0.1%, meaning inflation was biting. The core measure was 0.2% m-o-m, in line, as were the Fed’s-favoured PCE y-o-y deflator at 2.7% and the core at 2.8%, but they remain above the 2% target. However, the Chicago PMI that followed was a disaster at 35.4 vs. 41.6 expected, its lowest reading since Covid lockdowns of May 2020. New orders and order backlogs both fell to May 2020 levels, plunging 9.2 and 8 points, respectively.

The reaction saw US Treasury yields dropping and stocks rising despite inflation not falling. Recall our Fed-watcher Philip Marey has been warning the US is heading for stagflation – and the four rate cuts he expects to see over 2024 and 2025 will only be due to the ‘stag’ not the ‘flation’ part. Backing his view, the Daily Mail reports ‘A 'perfect storm' is wiping out America's restaurants’, with dining out declining as lifestyles are forced to shift by higher prices. Fortune adds, ‘The housing market is finally seeing more inventory, but buyers aren’t showing up as a ‘cold reality is settling down’. That offers the potential prospect of lower activity and lower prices – if owners sell, and lose their current low mortgage rate, rather than the housing market just freezing, not clearing.

The RBA’s Hunter says the “first and predominant challenge” is bringing inflation down; yet he cited the Reserve Bank’s dual full-employment mandate to explain why they aren’t (yet) raising rates again in order to do it. Meanwhile, as house prices continue to soar further even before rates do anything in either direction, the ABC stresses a ‘hidden home loans crisis’ as 2 in 5 Australians with mortgage debt, some 5.8m people, say they will have real difficulty making payments over the next 12 months. In short, parts of the economy say rates need to come down: but inflation says the opposite.

The same is true in weaker form in Europe. The ECB meeting on Thursday is almost certain to see rates cut by 25bp. However, our team notes, “one cut is no cut” in practical terms, and “lingering inflation risks tilt the odds towards a slower or shorter cycle than expected.”  

Central banks will be glad to see that while OPEC+ extended its voluntary production cuts of around 2m barrels a day through to Q3, oil is declining in response. However, Saudi Aramaco selling $12bn in shares in brisk trade does not suggest a truly bearish climate for oil, regardless of the global climate. Meanwhile, plenty of other commodities are going sharply higher – and we know what would happen to them and oil were rates to come down before inflation does.

So, that’s one kind of ‘Stag Do’. The other kind is the clashing of antlers.

Domestically, that means elections, with potential market impact. India’s PM Modi will retain his parliamentary majority, building the China > India market mojo switch; South Africa’s ANC lost its majority for the first time since the end of Apartheid, with the outlook now unclear; Mexico’s Claudia Sheinbaum, successor to outgoing President Obrador, is expected to win, meaning policy continuity; and former US president Trump claims to have raised $52.8m from small donors in one day post-conviction, and $200m over three days including larger donations - he also joined TikTok and gained 1m followers in an hour.

A Bloomberg survey says a Trump win is a risk to Fed independence, which would “likely rock financial markets”. 44% of respondents say they expect him to politicize the Fed or limit its power vs. just 6% who say he will leave it alone, and 35% who think he will use social media to lean on it. 24% say a Trump win would immediately cause 10-year Treasury yields to rise more than 25bps, 23% say a smaller rise would occur, and 24% that yields would fall. By contrast, 54% think Biden will leave the Fed alone --a low number reflecting the structural shifts towards a political-economy I flagged would emerge to roil markets-- 41% think he would lean on the Fed to urge lower rates to some degree, and 5% think he’d do more than that, while not specifying.

This week also sees the EU elections, which our team recently published a report on in regards to Europe’s attempts to respond to economic and geopolitical challenges by building ‘strategic autonomy’, with market-moving implications.

Internationally, the tail risks are also market moving. In the Middle East, President Biden floated a new peace proposal that could either see de-escalation or, if it fails, re-escalation. Ukraine used western HIMARS to attack Russia proper, after TASS warned ‘Full-scale war between Russia, West can’t be ruled out, expert says’. President Zelenskyy accused China of helping Russia sabotage his plans for a peace summit and prosecute its war, economically. The Philippines warned a clash with China in the South China Sea could spiral into war, as China’s defence minister countered of the “limits” to its restraint. China also warned about the formation of an “Asian NATO”, as Zelenskyy visits Manila.

EU foreign policy chief Borrell said he has seen no evidence of Chinese military support for Russia, and its help to Russia is not comparable to Iran and North Korea – true in drones and munitions, but not for overall aid to a war economy. He then added the EU doesn’t have the ability to sanction third countries that circumvent Russian sanctions: unwilling, maybe, but it is surely able. By contrast, a Financial Times op-ed from Deputy US Treasury Secretary Adeyemo (‘We need to put sand in the gears of the Russian war machine’) argues, “the private sector must play its part in Putin’s military-industrial complex”, specifically mentioning Russia’s imports of dual-use inputs. That suggests EU firms, and banks, will need to do more, and more broadly, not less on this front.

Unavoidable military rearmament will require a lot of bucks; and greater use of third country sanctions may mean many have even fewer in hand.

Meanwhile, against this backdrop, Bloomberg also reports: “War in the Middle East and Europe, US-China tensions, climate change, threats from new technologies - geopolitical risk is everywhere. A coterie of fund managers are pitching a class of ETFs that claim to offer a hedge for all that uncertainty. These funds, ranging in size from $8m to $800m in assets, strip out companies the managers say threaten national security or are vulnerable to state takeover or US sanctions… Champions of these ETFs view them as a corrective to what they see as Wall Street’s agnostic view of geopolitical developments… [using] publicly available information to screen companies on a range of criteria, including whether they’re under sanctions, work in cybersecurity, have been accused of human-rights violations, or have operated in disputed waters near China.”

The idea is a good one – but how do these ETFs account for information that isn’t publicly available, or project the second, third, fourth, nth order impact of on apparently safe firms from the spectrum of potential, conflating political and geopolitical tail risks now emerging? Surely a broader variety of hedging tools are required which look at scenario analysis and ‘then what(s)?’, including of the market kind mentioned in the Bloomberg survey above?

Another good idea is a safe, cheap pill that would ensure you can go for a wild weekend Stag Do/Bachelor Party/Buck’s Night and still emerge without The Hangover on Monday morning. But in the real world, that doesn’t exist yet either.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/geopolitical-risk-everywhere

Nigeria unions shut down power grid, disrupt airlines with strike over minimum wage

 Nigeria's main labor unions shut down the national grid and disrupted airline operations across the country on Monday (June 3).

This was the start of an indefinite strike over the government's failure to agree a new minimum wage.

In Lagos, artist Daniel Levi said he was booked onto an 11 a.m. flight to the capital Abuja.

"And it’s looking like there’s no hope because it’s almost 12 and the workers that were inside were chased to be outside right now so all hope is lost and I have to go back and hope we can move tomorrow."

This is the fourth strike by the Nigerian Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress, two of Nigeria's biggest unions, since President Bola Tinubu took office last year.

State-owned utility the Transmission Company of Nigeria said union members drove away operators at the country's power control rooms and shut down at least six substations.

That eventually shut down the national grid in the early hours of the morning.

Two airlines said the strike had grounded flights.

Emmanuel Jaja is deputy president of the Air Transport Service Senior Staff Association of Nigeria.

"Now we are inflicting hardship on Nigerians, which is not the normal thing, so if it is a government that is thinking about their citizens I think they should rethink and we go back to the table."

Since taking office, Tinubu has embarked on a series of bold economic reforms.

That's fueled a rise in inflation to an almost 30-year high and worsened a cost of living crisis.

Unions declared the indefinite strike on Friday (May 31) after the collapse of talks for a new minimum wage - meant to cushion the impact of reforms.

The unions said the strike would last until a new minimum wage was put in place.

https://finance.yahoo.com/video/nigeria-strike-shuts-power-grid-161424988.html