Search This Blog

Sunday, November 3, 2024

Chinese solar firms, ever-nimble, go further afield where US tariffs don't reach

 Some of the biggest Chinese-owned solar factories in Vietnam are cutting production and laying off workers, spurred on by the expansion of U.S. trade tariffs targeting it and three other Southeast Asian countries.

Meanwhile, in nearby Indonesia and Laos, a slew of new Chinese-owned solar plants are popping up, out of the reach of Washington's trade protections. Their planned capacity is enough to supply about half the panels installed in the U.S. last year, Reuters reporting shows.

Chinese solar firms have repeatedly shrunk output in existing hubs while building new factories in other countries, allowing them to sidestep tariffs and dominate the U.S. and global markets despite successive waves of U.S. tariffs over more than a decade designed to rein them in.

While Chinese firms have been moving their solar manufacturing for years, the scope of the shift to Indonesia and Laos in this latest phase has not previously been reported. More than a dozen people in five countries, including employees at Chinese plants, officials at non-Chinese solar companies and lawyers were interviewed for this article.

"It's a huge cat and mouse game," said William A. Reinsch, a former trade official in the Clinton administration and senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"It's not that hard to move. You set up and you play the game again. The design of the rules is such that the U.S. is usually one step behind."

China accounts for about 80% of the world's solar shipments, while its export hubs elsewhere in Asia make up much of the rest, according to SPV Market Research. That's a sharp contrast to two decades ago when the U.S. was a global leader in the industry.

America's imports of solar supplies, meanwhile, have tripled since Washington began imposing its tariffs in 2012, hitting a record $15 billion last year, according to federal data. While almost none came directly from China in 2023, some 80% came from Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia and Cambodia - home to factories owned by Chinese firms.

Washington slapped tariffs on solar exports from those four Southeast Asia nations last year and expanded them in October following complaints from manufacturers in the United States.

Over the last 18 months, at least four Chinese or China-linked projects have begun operations in Indonesia and Laos, and another two have been announced. Together, the projects total 22.9 gigawatts (GW) in solar cell or panel capacity.

Much of that production will be sold in the United States, the world's second-biggest solar market after China and one of the most lucrative. U.S. prices have on average been 40% higher than those in China over the past four years, according to data from PVinsights.

U.S. solar producers have repeatedly stated in trade complaints lodged with the U.S. government that they can't compete with cheap Chinese products that they say are unfairly supported by subsidies from the Chinese government and the Asian countries they export from.

Chinese solar firms have countered that their mastery of the technology makes them more competitive on price.

Tariffs are a key theme in the U.S. election, with Republican former President Donald Trump proposing levies on all U.S. imports to stimulate U.S. manufacturing, including a 60% rate on any goods from China. His rival, Democrat Vice President Kamala Harris has said Trump's plan would raise costs for U.S. consumers.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, however, have shown support for tougher tariffs on China's solar shipments to nurture a domestic supply chain.

"Going forward, the American public should demand much stricter enforcement of tariffs, especially around (China's) use of third countries to break U.S. trade law," Republican Congressman John Moolenaar, Chairman of the House Select Committee on China, told Reuters.

The U.S. Department of Commerce, the White House and China's commerce ministry did not respond to Reuters requests for comment.

PAIN IN VIETNAM

The most immediate visible impact of the latest U.S. tariffs, which have brought total duties to more than 300% for some producers, has been in Vietnam's solar sector.

In August, Reuters visited industrial parks in northern Vietnam owned by Chinese-owned companies including Longi and Trina Solar, and spoke with workers.

In Bac Giang province, hundreds of workers at a large factory complex owned by Longi Green Energy Technology's Vinasolar unit lost their jobs this year, two employees with knowledge of the matter said.

The company was using just one of nine production lines in the industrial park, one of them said.

In Thai Nguyen, another province, Trina Solar has idled one of its two factories making solar cells and panels, two employees there said.

The employees at both companies declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue.

Longi did not respond to Reuters requests for comment. It said in June it had suspended output at a Vietnamese solar cell plant but did not provide details. Trina declined to comment. It said in June that some facilities in Vietnam and Thailand would be shut down for maintenance without elaborating.

While U.S. solar import data shows shipments from Vietnam up almost 74% through August, industry analysts have attributed the jump to the frontloading of exports to get ahead of this year's U.S. tariffs.

Vietnam's government did not respond to requests for comment.

NEW EXPORT BASES, US PLANTS

Chinese solar companies are flocking to Indonesia motivated by the tariffs on Vietnam, according to Indonesian industry ministry official Beny Adi Purwanto who cited Thornova Solar as an example. Thornova says on its website its Indonesian plant has annual capacity to build 2.5 GW of solar modules and 2.5 GW of solar cells for the North American market.

A new 1 GW Trina module and cell plant will be fully operational by end 2024 and will expand capacity, according to Beny. He noted China Lesso Group's solar module plant which has 2.4 GW in production capacity.

China-linked New East Solar also announced a 3.5 GW panel and cell plant in Indonesia last year.

The Chinese companies did not respond to Reuters requests for comment.

The shift to Indonesian production has been sharp and swift, according to one manager at a U.S. solar firm who was told by their Chinese supplier in Indonesia that they're inundated with big orders from major Chinese firms looking to export to the United States.

"The scale is totally different," said the manager who declined to be identified.

Solar exports from Indonesia to the U.S. nearly doubled to $246 million through August of 2024, according to federal data.

Solar companies seeking greener pastures in Laos include Imperial Star Solar. The firm, which has Chinese roots but most of its production in Cambodia, opened a Laos wafer plant in March slated to eventually have 4 GW in capacity.

The move, it said in a statement at the time, helped it sidestep U.S. tariffs.

SolarSpace also opened a 5 GW solar cell plant in Laos in September 2023. The primary purpose of transferring production capacity to Laos was not related to U.S. tariffs, the company said in a statement to Reuters but did not elaborate.

Solar exports from Laos to the U.S. were non-existent in the first eight months of last year but were worth some $48 million through August of 2024.

Others are going further afield.

JinkoSolar said in July it had signed an almost $1 billion deal with partners in Saudi Arabia to build a new 10 GW solar cell and module plant in the kingdom.

Construction of U.S. solar-manufacturing plants by Chinese companies is also surging as they too seek to take advantage of U.S. incentives.

Chinese companies will have at least 20 GW worth of annual solar panel production capacity on U.S. soil within the next year, enough to serve about half the U.S. market, according to a Reuters analysis.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/TRINA-SOLAR-CO-LTD-111379921/news/Chinese-solar-firms-ever-nimble-go-further-afield-where-US-tariffs-don-t-reach-48242118/

China urges France to get EU to arrive at palatable EV solution

 China has urged France to take on "an active role" to push the European Commission towards a solution acceptable to both the European and Chinese electric vehicle industries, Beijing's commerce ministry said on Monday, citing its minister.

Wang Wentao, in a meeting with French junior trade minister Sophie Primas on Sunday, reiterated the EU's investigation into China's EVs is a major concern and has "seriously hindered" China-EU auto industry cooperation.

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/latest/China-urges-France-to-get-EU-to-arrive-at-palatable-EV-solution-48242143/

Britain's Sainsbury's extends Aldi price match scheme to convenience stores

  Sainsbury's said it has become the first UK supermarket group to extend a scheme matching the prices of German-owned discounter Aldi on hundreds of products into its convenience stores, upping the competitive ante ahead of the key Christmas trading season. The group, which has an over 15% share of Britain's grocery market, trailing only industry leader Tesco, said on Monday its Aldi Price Match scheme would now be available in over 800 convenience stores in addition to its almost 600 supermarkets.

Under CEO Simon Roberts, Sainsbury's has benefited from a strategy to match Aldi's prices on over 500 products in its supermarkets, along with providing better offers for members of its popular Nectar loyalty scheme, financed by cutting costs, with industry data showing higher market share year-on-year.

The company said its Sainsbury's Local convenience stores would now carry up to 200 products price matched to Aldi, including staples like milk, bread, butter, pasta, rice, chicken and tuna.

Tesco, No. 3 player Asda, and No. 5 Morrisons all price match Aldi on some products in their larger stores. Sainsbury's will publish first half results on Nov. 7.

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/TESCO-PLC-4000540/news/Britain-s-Sainsbury-s-extends-Aldi-price-match-scheme-to-convenience-stores-48242158/

2 decisions that crushed Harris’s momentum

 Not a single Democrat I speak with believes that Vice President Kamala Harris will win on Tuesday.

All hoped for an open convention in August to identify and select the best candidate possible, but they were denied. To that point, this past Thursday, The Hill featured a piece headlined, “Democrats start to point fingers even as they hope for Harris win.”

A Democratic strategist is quoted as saying, “People are nervous, and they’re trying to cover their ass and get a little ahead of Election Day. It’s based on anxiety, stakes and the unique nature of this cycle. We didn’t have a traditional process for this election. We didn’t have a primary. People just had to fall in line.”

Again, this is coming from a Democrat. They had to just “fall in line” because they were ordered to do so. Then, any hope of an open convention was further dashed by the combined backroom dealings of the Democratic National Committee, former President Barack Obama, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).

Immediately after those backroom dealings, every nonconforming Democrat had to accept that Harris, without getting one vote in the primary, was being installed by the machine to replace the sputtering President Joe Biden. With that selection predetermined, Biden officially announced on July 21 that he would not be running for reelection and was endorsing Harris as his replacement.

The temporary buzz and “joy” began. Except it began to dissipate even before the Democratic convention in Chicago on Aug. 19. Why? Because Harris picked Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate on Aug. 6. As these Democratic operatives told me, from almost day one, she had to spend precious time and energy defending that choice.

The selection of Walz is the first reason she lost momentum. To be sure, much of the party — and many in the liberal media — wanted Harris to pick the more moderate Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro — first because the Keystone State was certain to be the most pivotal in the election, and second because Shapiro would have added some ideological balance to the ticket.

By any honest analysis, Harris is a far-left liberal. That said, it can be argued that Walz is even further to the left than she is. Leaving aside the practical reasons Harris should have picked a more moderate running mate is the reality that self-described “knucklehead” Walz has been a liability from day one.

The choice of Walz yoked Harris to all of his baggage — his exaggerations of his military recordhis DUI arrest, which involved him driving 96 miles per hour with a 0.128 percent blood alcohol content; his multiple visits to China and associations with communist officials; his fabrication that he was in Hong Kong on the day of the Tiananmen Square massacre when he was actually in Nebraska; his being turned into an “Elmer Fudd” meme because of his comical handling of a shotgun; and his being the governor who allowed violent anarchists to run wild and burn down parts of Minneapolis.

To add insult to injury, Trump running mate Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) clearly trounced the obviously nervous and unprepared Walz during their vice presidential debate on Oct. 10.

The second decision that greatly contributed to the crushing of the Harris momentum came on Aug. 23, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suspended his independent campaign for president and endorsed former President Donald Trump.

The timing of the announcement could not have been worse for Harris or her campaign. The Kennedy announcement, the very day after her convention ended, sucked a great deal of helium out of her joy-filled message and polling bounce.

But again, the damage was much worse than just stepping on the high of her convention. The biased opinions of the liberal media and the Democratic Party aside, Kennedy is deeply respected by millions of Americans who view him as a principled, highly intelligent original thinker who will fight for their causes against the corrupt entrenched establishments.

The day Kennedy dropped out of the race and endorsed Trump, Politico reported that “Kennedy’s unorthodox views drew support from Democrats and Republicans. Both parties worried that he would be the biggest electoral spoiler in decades. The presidential election remains incredibly close, and if even a fraction of Kennedy’s support moves to Trump, it could be decisive in swing states.”

Indeed. But I believe it’s going to be a great deal more than just a “fraction.” One of the main reasons is the “mom vote.” Kennedy’s endorsement will potentially bring millions of previously ambivalent female voters to the table for Trump. Why? Because they are moms who are worried about the health and wellbeing of their children and have long believed that Kennedy was one of the few people in public life who would protect those children. This is a much bigger deal than the media realizes or will acknowledge. It is a real game changer.

Toward that end, these moms want Trump to win so he will bring Kennedy into his cabinet —which Trump will undoubtedly do.

Harris may have been a flawed candidate from the beginning, but she was building some momentum after being installed as the Democratic nominee on July 21. That momentum proved fleeting. It was extinguished by her decision to pick Walz and Kennedy’s decision to suspend his campaign and endorse Trump.

Look for Shapiro to use Harris’s poor judgement and her crushed momentum as a springboard for his 2028 campaign.

Douglas MacKinnon is a former White House and Pentagon official.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4965971-the-two-decisions-that-crushed-harriss-momentum/

Will it Really be a Cliffhanger?

 By Clarice Feldman

I think it wise to just vote and ignore the polls and pundits, many of whom are dealing from the bottom of the deck and bluffing. I’d also ignore those doomsters who claim on the basis of the 2020 election that it will be stolen. Sure, as I note below, there has been and will be a lot of cheating, but the Republicans are getting better at monitoring it and reducing it. Sure, the press is lying again, but as I show below, the legacy media has blown its credibility and alternate content providers are capturing audiences away from them.

Polls and Pundits

Bill Shipley offers up the best, most succinct, argument for ignoring pollsters and using your own estimates of the strength of enthusiasm and ground games to predict the outcome: 

The "noise" today that Harris is rallying and Trump is stalling, and early vote totals from women in some battleground states are becoming harbingers of doom for Trump have one purpose:

To prevent a down-ballot wipeout of Dems if voters become demoralized and think that Trump has it sewn up. 

Nothing has happened in the race to support the media polling out today -- MEDIA POLLING -- from outfits like Marist and Emerson. 

In 2020 Marist had Biden +5 in PA, +6 in NC. Two weeks before the Nov. 2020 election, Marist had Biden ahead by 11 nationally.

Same for Emerson. Its last poll in 2020 had Biden +5 nationally. 

They had Biden +8 in Wisconsin, +7 in Michigan, +4 in PA.

 

They had Biden +1 in Ohio and Trump +1 in Iowa.

Trump won both states +8.

So, when you see the media walking out these polls today as evidence of a Harris comeback, understand they are Eastern Colleges, affiliated with anti-Trump media organizations, and their JOB -- which the media has embraced -- is to push Harris to victory.  

The 2020 Election Prologue

A number of posters on X reminded us this week of the media and intelligence community’s interference with the last national election. Here’s Michael Shellenberger:

All the major elements of the FBI & CIA conspiracy to interfere in the 2020 election on behalf of Joe Biden are now confirmed: -- FBI had the Hunter Biden laptop in Dec. 2019 & knew it "was real" immediately -- FBI, spying on Giuliani, knew he would give the laptop to media -- FBI ran a disinformation campaign in the summer of 2020 to "prebunk" the story with journalists & social media companies, both directly and through Aspen Institute, by falsely claiming Russians were planning disinfo relating to Hunter Biden -- "Former" FBI General Counsel turned Twitter Dep. Counsel, Jim Baker, convinced colleagues to censor the NY Post story after they had determined that it had *not* violated Twitter's Terms of Service -- CIA Director Gina Haspel approved, within a few hours, a disinformation campaign by 51 "former" CIA and other Intelligence Community leaders who falsely claimed the laptop was Russian disinformation The result was that millions of voters thought the laptop was fake and never learned that Joe Biden oversaw a vast influence-peddling scheme involving China, Ukraine, and other nations, with his son and brother, until after the election. These are high crimes for which people should go to prison.

And Mollie Hemingway on how by chance she was an eyewitness to Jake Tapper, Jim Sciutto, and James Clapper firing off together the Russian Collusion hoax on a CNN set.

Maze Moore comments on the perfidy in 2020 of the Washington Post:

The Washington Post committed massive election interference on behalf of Joe Biden to help him win in 2020. WP produced a fake story through its "fact checking" department that became nationally accepted and served as the basis for exonerating Biden of corruption in Ukraine. [snip] Hunter Biden was being paid by corrupt, criminal oligarch Zlochevsky, owner of Burisma. At the same time, Joe Biden demanded that Prosecutor General Shokin be fired or that he would not release U.S. aid to Ukraine. It worked. Shokin was fired. There are two options. Prosecutor General Shokin's office was investigating the owner of Burisma or it wasn't. If it was, that means that Joe Biden blackmailed the President of Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating a criminal who was paying his son millions of dollars for doing nothing. If that is the accepted narrative, there is no way around it. There is a good chance that Biden does not get elected. Even Trump's phone call that led to the first impeachment would have been seen differently. Or... the Prosecutor General wasn't investigating Zlochevsky and Joe Biden just cared a lot about fighting corruption in Ukraine. This actually became the narrative and it was because of the WP. The Washington Post never spoke to PG Shokin even though Shokin volunteered to talk. [snip] "The investigation into Burisma was dormant." And boy did they run that story over and over and over. Every single day until half the country was mindlessly repeating it. Dan Goldman quoted the Washington Post story repeatedly in defense of Joe Biden. French journalist Olivier Berruyer actually looked into what Shokin did during his one year stint as PG. Turns out, the investigation was active the entire year. The court had seized all of Zlochevsky's personal property just days before Biden demanded that Shokin be fired. Biden absolutely did use foreign aid to get a prosecutor fired who was investigating a criminal who was paying his son. Biden said they replaced Shokin with "someone solid." That person closed all criminal cases against Zlochevsky and settled for a fine. The fact checkers at the WP straight up lied about other aspects of the story. 

This week Trump’s Truth Social parent company was valued at $10.6 billion, a 
figure higher than the New York Times market cap of $9.25 billion. We don't trust the media any longer, and they've given us no reason to. As even Jeff Bezos, owner of the Washington Post admits, journalism is now the least trusted profession. (Something only magnified by sensationalist lunacy like claims that the Madison Square Rally was a Nazi party event or that Trump praised Hitler, or that he will round up his opposition in concentration camps, or outlaw abortions nationwide.)

Quite simply in advance of this critical election the press is self-immolating:

When the media throws a massive, unhinged temper tantrum -- like they did over Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally this past week -- it accomplishes two things. 

First, it recalibrates the media even further to the left side of the political aisle, ensuring they will lose the viewership (and likely the votes) of those further left in the center-left area of the political spectrum. Every day, the mainstream media behaves so bizarrely that it can’t help but open the eyes of many in the center-left who have otherwise already been ‘captured’ by legacy media. 

Second, it simply encourages more of their viewers to switch to alternative media. There’s a reason the Donald Trump interview on Joe Rogan was the most sought-after interview of the presidential election cycle, and there’s a reason both Trump and J.D. Vance went on a podcast tour as part of their campaigns: these alternative content producers are not only where audiences are now, but where audiences are going and growing

The journalistic liberties and exaggerations taken with rhetoric and left-wing talking points, many backed by anonymous sources, are being seen for what they are: lies. 

Take, for example, this past week’s absolute obsession with comparing Donald Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally to a Nazi rally. Most of my readers know this is an unhinged comparison from the get-go -- but what about that earnest independent or left-wing voter who believed the media’s narrative that it was some kind of hate-fueled fascist meetup? 

Imagine their thoughts when the rally, initially cast as some kind of anti-Semitic KKK Groupon event, was followed by photos on social media showing Israeli flags:

And Jewish attendees wrapping Tefillin and praying [snip]

And here’s MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski having a complete normal one about it:

“I think it was everything that you need to know about Donald Trump in one weird, white nationalist, Nazi-type rally, and of course, there’s historic parallels to where and when this happened.”

In fact, one can almost draw a direct correlation between the positive early voting numbers for the GOP and the ramping up of Hitler and Nazi rhetoric from the left.[snip]

As Joe Rogan pointed out to Donald Trump… many of these same media figures adored him before he entered politics. Surely, the hosts on The View didn’t think he was a racist, misogynist homophobe back when they were laughing with him, right?

And J.D. Vance proved this week, during his interview with Jake Tapper, that when confronted with the truth, the media only squirms further.[snip]

I predicted that the mainstream media would collapse under the weight of independent media’s rise. 

Since then, their ratings have been decimated, and they’ve lost even more trust. 

It’s a New Day

There have been such vast improvements in the Republican fraud catching and halting efforts this time around, it’s hard to keep up with them, though Elizabeth Nickson has done an admirable job recording how every county, every precinct is being watched by hawk-faced MAGA men and women who plan to be "agile, mobile. Move like lightning and sound like thunder.” People like Elon Musk, Scott Presler, True the Vote and its 100,000 volunteers, donor Miriam Adelson, Charlie Kirk’s Turnout for America, the RNC’s 200,000 volunteers, Trump Force 47, and hundreds of thousands of canvassers. In my experience it’s the folks on the  ground who spell the difference between victory and defeat, and Nickerson pays them earned respect.

Atlas, the most accurate pollster in 2020 predicts a clean sweep. I agree with those who contend that Trump need only snatch victory in one brick of the blue wall to win, but despite the best efforts of the many people and groups Nickson details, there remain an estimated 3.2 million illegal votes out there which will be counted -- votes which come through the ERIC electronic registration program in use in 28 states.

How this boils out is still, therefore, not really predictable, but I’m inclined to the view of Scott Adams

I predict Trump will get the most real votes, but Democrats will empty the trickster vault to keep him from being certified and taking office on schedule. I predict massive voter fraud will be discovered and it will confirm in the minds of the public that Trump was probably right about 2020 being rigged. It will be the greatest Third Act in political history. I predict America will sort it all out by the end of January(ish). Probably via Supreme Court. Trump will take office. The Golden Age begins. 

I guess the Left figured that will be the case, too. They're gearing up for post-election mayhem here in D.C., and in Portland, Seattle, and everywhere else where they succeeded in defunding the police.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/11/will_it_really_be_a_cliffhanger.html

Trump courts Arab and Muslim support, with Harris criticized for ‘not engaging’

 Former President Trump and his surrogates in the Arab and Muslim communitiesare doubling down on their efforts to win over the traditionally Democratic constituency amid widespread anger over the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Polls over the last month have shown that Trump holds a lead among this demographic voting bloc, erasing the traditional 2-to-1 Democratic advantage. That could have a particularly significant impact in the swing state of Michigan, home to hundreds of thousands of Muslim voters and Arab voters. President Biden won the state by close to 150,000 votes. 

On Friday, Trump became the first major party nominee to visit Dearborn, Mich., which is majority Arab, building on his momentum in the community. 

“It helps when Trump has his family camped out in Dearborn campaigning for votes and Trump himself keeps crashing events,” said Jim Zogby, the founding director of the Arab American Institute and a former adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). 

Trump’s efforts come as surrogates for Vice President Harris say she hasn’t made enough of an effort to personally engage with those voters.

“You can’t just say at one rally that you welcome Arab voters and then not make any effort to engage with them or follow through,” Zogby said. “That doesn’t send the same message as having the father-in-law of your daughter practically camped out with the community, and having one of your top foreign policy advisers there meeting with people and preparing the ground for him to come to town.” 

Trump has put Massad Boulos, a Lebanese American businessman and Tiffany Trump’s father-in-law, in charge of Arab and Muslim outreach alongside Richard Grinnell, Trump’s former director of national intelligence, who has been floated as a potential secretary of State. 

Boulous’s campaigning has paid off in Michigan. Trump has won the endorsements of Dearborn Heights Mayor Bill Bazzi (D), Hamtrack Mayor Amer Ghalib (D), and a group of notable imams and other religious leaders in the state. Dearborn’s mayor, a Democrat, has announced that he will not endorse either candidate. 

“Trump has capitalized on Muslim voters being ignored by Democrats and by the Harris campaign,” said Nazita Lajevardi, an associate political science professor at Michigan State University. “He’s been endorsed by some mayors and imams from Michigan, which is representative of the fact that Democrats have done absolutely nothing to not even discuss Gaza, but even acknowledge the severity of what is happening in Gaza … I mean, there’s just almost an insane pact among Democrats to just not give voice to it. 

“It’s unfortunate that the Harris campaign could not be more sincere in their engagement with Muslim electorate,” she added. 

Wa’el Alzayat, the CEO of Emgage, which is the nation’s largest Muslim advocacy group and has endorsed Harris, dismissed the endorsements of Trump, saying that the leaders “do not represent the majority of Muslims.” Emgage has endorsed Harris.

Alzayat also pointed to meetings in recent weeks between Harris campaign leaders and advisers, including her senior national security adviser, Phil Gordon, in recent weeks and Arab and Muslim leaders as evidence of the campaign’s outreach with voters. Harris also met with Muslim and Arab leaders in early October in Flint. 

“They have been engaging a lot in Michigan with community leaders,” Alzayat said. “She has relied also Attorney General Keith Ellison for engagement with the Muslim community, including in Michigan … There’s, there’s been 10s and 10s of other engagements behind the scene with various campaign and policy officials.” 

Another Democrat on the ground, Ismael Ahmed, who served in the state’s cabinet and as a state party vice chair, also criticized the Harris campaign for making “tactical” decisions, including not inviting a Palestinian to speak at the DNC. 

“I think they could have done more in the community…they are doing a lot, but they can do more,” Ahmed said. “The decision not to have a Palestinian speak at the Democratic convention was a really bad decision, and there have been other decisions that were made that were tactical but undermined their ability to bring our community together.” 

Democrats also criticized the campaign’s decision to bring Rep. Ritchie Torres and former President Bill Clinton to campaign in Michigan. In the last year, Torres has made a name for himself by criticizing pro-Palestinian activists. During a campaign event on WednesdayOct.30, Clinton defended Israel’s killing of civilians, saying Hamas has been using them as human shields. 

Robert S. McCaw, director of the Center for American Islamic Relations Government Affairs, Director Robert. S. McCaw slammed Clinton’s remarks in a written statement, calling them “callous and dishonest,” and said that it was “unacceptable to dismissively reference Islam and falsely claim that every Palestinian man, woman and child killed by Israel was a human shield.” 

Alzayat agreed. 

“I say this as the head of an organization that endorsed Harris…we find Ritchie Torres offensive and not becoming of the Democratic Party and we have a serious problem with people like him and you know, that’s something that needs to be addressed after the election,” Alzayat said. “And, I also think Bill Clinton needs to just stay in retirement because he’s really not helping the cause with these statements…he’s just out of touch.”  

On the Republican side, Boulos and Trump have capitalized on these divisions to push their message. 

According to Boulous, he first approached Trump about winning support in the community earlier this year, and he has worked with the campaign to target both Muslim and Christian Arab voters. 

“Arab Christians are not talked about a lot, but the majority of Middle Easterners in the United States are Christians, not Muslims, close to 70 percent, but most people don’t look at it from that point of view,” Boulos told The Hill. “We’ve done a lot of work with that community as well, especially the Caldean community in Michigan, which is about 200,000, and the Lebanese Christian…so we’ve been doing a lot of outreach and the president has been posting in recent days about some of these communities.” 

Trump also recently wrote a letter to the Lebanese American community asking for its support, and he has also made posts calling on other Arab Christian groups to cast their ballots for him. Earlier this month, Trump also sat down for an interview with Al Arabiya, the largest Arab news network in the U.S., and also sat with the largest Lebanese TV station for an interview. 

In its outreach to the community, his campaign has focused both on the conflict in Gaza and on conservative social values, since many older Muslims skew socially conservative. 

The outreach has had some success with a group of imams, including Husham Al-Husainy, an Iraqi sheik who leads the Karbaala Education Center in Dearborn. 

“I am supporting Donald Trump because he opposes gay marriage and he is the most Christian person in the election,” Al-Husainy said. “He will return us to conservative values, and I am a Muslim and I will stand with whoever opposes gay marriage.” 

Trump has not explicitly said he supports a federal ban on gay marriage, which has been a constitutional right since 2014 and which Congress statutorily protected in 2022. 

According to Samraa Luqman, a progressive activist who wrote in Sen. Bernie Sanders’s (I-Vt.) name in the 2020 presidential election but is now backing Trump, told The Hill that Trump’s appeals to conservative values have begun to move the needle for older, more conservative voters in the community.

Trump and Boulos have also made repeated claims that they will “solve the Middle East crisis.” which Democrats have questioned, saying they are not “genuine.” 

Boulos did not provide any additional information about potential Trump peace plans in Gaza, saying Trump “was not in office, so it was not appropriate to share plans.”

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4966750-trump-arab-muslim-voters-michigan/

FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule

 A Federal Communications Commission (FCC) commissioner has claimed that Vice President Harris’s recent appearance on “Saturday Night Live” violates the “equal time” rule.

“This is a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule,” Commissioner Brendan Carr posted on the social platform X Saturday in response to a post from The Associated Press about Harris being on the show that night.

“The purpose of the rule is to avoid exactly this type of biased and partisan conduct – a licensed broadcaster using the public airwaves to exert its influence for one candidate on the eve of an election. Unless the broadcaster offered Equal Time to other qualifying campaigns,” Carr, a Trump appointee, continued.

The FCC’s “equal time” rules let rival candidates ask for equal air time

During her appearance on this week’s episode of “SNL” Harris joined comedian Maya Rudolph, who often impersonates her, for a cold open sketch. While Rudolph was playing the vice president, Harris began her “SNL” debut on the other side of a mirror from the comedian.

“I’m just here to remind you, you got this, because you can do something your opponent can’t do — you can open doors,” Harris told Rudolph, seemingly referring to a video from earlier in the week in which former President Trump had a hard time grabbing the handle of a garbage truck.

The executive producer of “SNL,” Lorne Michaels, had said in a past interview that neither Harris nor Trump would make appearances on his show during this election cycle.

“You can’t bring the actual people who are running on because of election laws and the equal time provisions,” he said to The Hollywood Reporter two months ago. “You can’t have the main candidates without having all the candidates, and there are lots of minor candidates that are only on the ballot in, like, three states and that becomes really complicated.”

The Hill has reached out to NBC, the FCC and the Harris campaign for comment.

https://thehill.com/homenews/4968217-fcc-commissioner-claims-harris-on-snl-violates-equal-time-rule/