Search This Blog

Thursday, January 2, 2025

Is This The Beginning Of A Terror Wave?

 The New Year had barely begun when one and possibly two terrorist attacks were unleashed that claimed the lives of more than a dozen innocent people.

In New Orleans, 15 people have so far died after a driver rammed a truck through a crowd of revelers on Bourbon Street Wednesday morning. The driver had an ISIS flag in the rented pickup and likely didn’t act alone.

Police have since reported pipe bombs with a remote detonator were in the truck, as well as others placed in the French Quarter. The FBI told reporters that it doesn’t think the driver, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, acted alone.

The Airbnb where he stayed and where bomb-making materials were found, also caught fire.

read moreIssues Insights6dA More Effective Safety Net, Not A Basic Income,Will Help Lift People Out of PovertySay, Whatever Happened To That New COVID Surge Everyone- Was- Freaking- About?-Share Story
FacebookLinkedInTwitterTelegramWhatsAppCopy
AboutLogin

Later that same morning, a Tesla Cybertruck exploded outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas.

In a post on X, Elon Musk wrote that “We have now confirmed that the explosion was caused by very large fireworks and/or a bomb carried in the bed of the rented Cybertruck and is unrelated to the vehicle itself.”

As it happens, both the pickup used in the New Orleans attack and the Cybertruck had been rented through the Turo app, which calls itself “world’s largest car sharing marketplace,” and lets users rent cars from “trusted hosts.”

Is this the beginning of a wave of terror attacks inside the U.S.?

There’s reason to worry.

For almost four years, the Biden administration has been asleep at the wheel when it comes to terror threats.

After his disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, ISIS “filled the power vacuum left behind by the U.S. and established a caliphate the size of Indiana to terrorize the region and inspire attacks across Europe and the U.S.,” Rep. Michael Waltz, R-Fla., wrote back in April.

Biden’s open-border policy allowed suspected terrorists to flood into the U.S. An August report from the House Judiciary Committee found that Border Patrol agents “encountered” 250 people at the southern border who were on terrorist watch lists. At least 99 of them were later released into the U.S. Those are just the ones who were caught. There are countless “gotaways” who avoided being “encountered.”

The FBI has appeared to be more interested in tracking right-wing terror threats such as devout Catholics and mothers who speak up at school board hearings than actual terrorists.

It doesn’t help matters that the FBI at first pretended that the New Orleans attack wasn’t a terrorist attack, or that Biden’s instinct was to look out for the interest of Muslims, saying that “nobody should jump to conclusions” – in remarks where he also noted the New Orleans killer “posted videos on social media indicating that he was inspired by ISIS, especially the desire to kill.”

These New Year’s Day attacks didn’t come out of the blue, and if history is a guide, they won’t be the last.

The only solace we have in all this is that there will be a new sheriff in town in 18 days.

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/01/02/is-this-what-were-in-for-in-2025/

House Report Discloses New Information on Unsolved J6 Pipe Bomber

 by Julie Kelly

Four years after what the FBI describes as an act of domestic terror--the protest at the Capitol on January 6, 2021--federal authorities have not yet solved the most consequential crime of that day: the presence of two explosive devices within blocks of the U.S. Capitol.

report issued today by Representatives Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky), chairmen of House subcommittees examining the events of January 6 and the work of the January 6 Select Committee, details how the FBI investigation into the so-called pipe bomber went cold by early 2021 despite dedicating significant resources into finding the suspect and initially identifying several “persons of interest.”

The FBI originally claimed an individual wearing a hoodie planted the devices near the headquarters of the Republican National Committee and outside the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee on January 5, 2021 between the hours of 7:30 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. The devices were not discovered until 17 hours later, coincidentally, around the same time the Joint Session of Congress convened at 1:00 p.m. on January 6 to debate the results of the 2020 presidential election. A woman doing her laundry found a pipe bomb in an alleyway near the RNC headquarters at around 12:40 p.m.; a plainclothes Capitol Police officer discovered a similar device outside the DNC headquarters at 1:05 p.m.

The latter situation posed an extreme danger to incoming Vice President Kamala Harris, who left the Capitol at 11:25 a.m. and inexplicably went to the DNC, where she remained until around 1:15 p.m. As I have reported, several officers including numerous Secret Service agents and a bomb-sniffing canine failed to detect the device sitting just steps away from the building’s entrance.

News of the devices prompted the evacuation of nearby buildings and set off the first wave of panic that afternoon. Some top law enforcement officials including former U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund believe the devices were a diversionary tactic. “[While] law enforcement has not identified the suspect responsible for planting both pipe bombs, the explosive devices played a critical role in how the events of that day unfolded. Whether intended to or not, both pipe bombs acted as diversions, forcing law enforcement to draw resources away from the Capitol,” the report states. The first exterior breach of Capitol grounds occurred at 12:53 p.m.

But no one has been arrested despite a $500,000 reward offered by the FBI. Further, the failure to locate the J6 pipe bomber doesn’t add up considering the extensive investigative tools still being used by the FBI to track down and arrest J6 protesters, a caseload now approaching 1,600 individuals.

Footdragging, Stonewalling, and Non-Interest by J6 Truth Seekers

Not only did the trail go cold, either intentionally or organically, the same political leaders and government officials who promised to expose the “truth” about the events of January 6 oddly are uninterested in the pipe bomb threat and not cooperating with Republicans in their separate attempts to find the bomber. The report discloses extensive stonewalling by federal and local agencies including the FBI, the ATF, the U.S. Secret Service, and the Metropolitan (DC) Police Department related to House Republicans’ requests for documents and interviews to help better understand the failed pipe bomb investigation.

“[The] FBI has failed to provide any responsive documents. On December 12, 2023, FBI Deputy Assistant Director Matthew Foder briefed the Committee on the status of the FBI’s pipe bomb investigation. Deputy Assistant Director Foder’s briefing failed to satisfy even the Committee’s most basic informational needs and dealt exclusively with information already in the public domain.”

The former head of the Washington FBI field office, Steven D’Antuono, who led the pipe bomb investigation for nearly two years, also appears to have misled Congress by claiming some of the cell phone files obtained by the FBI were “corrupted,” which impeded their investigation. But according to today’s report, “the major cell carriers confirmed that they did not provide corrupted data to the FBI and that the FBI never notified them of any issues with accessing the cellular data.”

Further, despite promises to fully investigate every aspect of January 6, the January 6 Select Committee ignored what represented the biggest threat to public safety and the safety of top elected officials including Harris and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“A thorough review of almost three terabytes of data turned over by the Select Committee yielded shockingly few results regarding the pipe bombs— emphasizing how the Select Committee failed to thoroughly investigate the security and operational failures surrounding the events of January 6,” the report reveals. Rep. Bennie Thompson, chair of the now defunct committee, told Massie in 2023 that his committee did not look into the pipe bomb matter. The committee’s final 845-page report devoted less than three pages to the pipe bomb incidents and relegated it to the appendix.

Even after the devices were detected on Jan 6, security perimeters established around both locations insufficiently protected the public, commuters, and nearby Congressional buildings, the report confirms:

On January 6, 2021, the actions of federal law enforcement before, during, and after the discovery of the pipe bombs at the RNC and DNC constituted a series of egregious safety and security failures. First, federal law enforcement failed to conduct a thorough security sweep of the DNC, resulting in the delayed discovery of one of the pipe bombs. As a result of the USSS’s decision to not use critical explosive detection capabilities, the USSS failed to identify the device and allowed civilians and the Vice President-elect to pass within feet of the DNC pipe bomb. Second, after learning of the pipe bombs, federal law enforcement failed to properly secure and maintain perimeters around the pipe bombs, allowed commuter trains to transit within close proximity of the pipe bomb, and failed to prevent contamination of the crime scene. Lastly, federal law enforcement risked the safety and security of protectees during the evacuation from the Capitol. Despite repeated attempts to notify law enforcement stationed along the perimeter, numerous civilians, law enforcement officers, congressional leadership, and even trains passed by the pipe bombs, needlessly risking human life.

A motorcade carrying Pelosi drove past the device after it was detected but before it was detonated. “Prior to Speaker Pelosi’s motorcade driving by the DNC pipe bomb, federal law enforcement had allowed more than fifteen vehicles to drive past the DNC pipe bomb despite repeated calls over the radio for law enforcement units to stop all traffic passing by the explosive device. The breakdown in command and control around the DNC pipe bomb and the failure to correct the breaches of the security perimeter culminated in law enforcement risking the safety of congressional leadership.”

Plenty of Leads, No Answers

The subcommittees’ report describes a full throttle investigation into the pipe bombs early on.

In the immediate aftermath of January 6, the FBI’s case team worked aggressively to cultivate and pursue leads toward apprehending the pipe bomb suspect. As of January 2021, the FBI’s investigation consisted of over fifty investigators, including special agents, data analysts, Task Force officers, and support staff. Of those more than fifty investigators, thirty were special agents assigned to the case. The investigation also comprised of a range of investigative support teams such as the Cellular Analysis Survey Team, the Computer Analysis Response Team, and the Digital Imaging and Video Recovery Team. As a result, by April 2021, the FBI had collected over 105,000,000 data points in connection with the investigation.

In February 2021, the FBI identified 186 phone numbers of interest; 36 numbers were assigned to agents for interviews, 98 required additional investigative steps. Fifty-one were categorized as "not needing further action" because the phones "belong[ed] to law enforcement officers or persons on the exclusion list."

By using another sophisticated investigative technique--tracking advertising data--the FBI case team, according to the report, “identified one [individual] whose movements matched the suspect’s movements as outlined by the video the FBI released tracking the suspect’s whereabouts.” But the result of that “significant lead…remains unclear,” the report states.

More Unanswered Questions

How is it possible the pipe bomber remains at large given the extensive resources first expended by the FBI and at their disposal to this day? Why did the J6 Select Committee avoid looking into the threat, particularly since it posed a mortal danger to both the incoming vice president and the Speaker of the House, who created the committee? Why did Kamala Harris never discuss her near-assassination attempt on the campaign trail? Why did D’Antuono mislead Congress about the condition of cell phone data? Why has the media stopped covering the pipe bombs?

The good news for now is that House Republicans are not backing down. The key to permanently unraveling the entire Jan 6 narrative is tied to the mystery pipe bomber—and once that missing puzzle piece is found, the public likely will find more shocking revelations.


https://www.declassified.live/p/house-report-discloses-new-information

Who Biden’s FBI Decided To Persecute Rather Than Hunt Down Real Terrorists

 Early Wednesday morning, a radical Islamic terrorist drove his truck through a crowd of people celebrating the start of the New Year in New Orleans. Fifteen people were murdered and more than 35 injured. But maybe this tragedy could have been avoided if the FBI spent less time targeting parents, Catholics, and countless other dissidents and instead focused its resources on catching actual terrorists.

Shamsud-Din Jabbar plowed through a crowd in his Ford F-150 Lightning EV truck draped with an ISIS flag before shooting at police officers, who fatally shot Jabbar. Jabbar “recently converted to Islam” and “began acting erratically in recent months,” according to The New York Times.

Unfortunately under the leadership of then FBI Director Christopher Wray, the FBI was too busy doing things like helping to orchestrate a kidnapping plot targeting Democrat Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to catch a terrorist.

Here are some others the FBI was too busy targeting while a terrorist became radicalized on U.S. soil.

Catholics

Documents obtained by House Republicans in 2023 reveals multiple FBI field offices were involved in the drafting of the infamous memo that labeled Catholics as potential domestic terrorists.

A leaked FBI memo revealed a Richmond, Virginia, field office was investigating alleged “white supremacy” amongst Catholics who attended Latin Mass. The memo warned of “Radical-Traditionalist Catholics” and noted possible infiltration into Catholic communities using “various kinds of informants.” Subsequent memos show FBI field offices in Los Angeles and Portland were involved in targeting Catholics.

Trump Supporters

Jabbar reportedly began radicalizing in recent months, according to The New York Times. But the FBI wouldn’t have caught on to that because around the same time that Jabbar was radicalizing, the FBI was singling out Trump supporters, a report from Newsweek showed.

Newsweek reported that “nearly two-thirds of the FBI’s current investigations” focused on Trump supporters accused of disregarding “anti-riot” laws.

After Jan. 6, the FBI expanded its “anti-government or anti-authority violent extremists-other” (AGAAVE) category to “jumpstart investigations into Americans based on their political affiliations,” as my colleague Jordan Boyd reported. More than a year later, the FBI created the “AGAAVE-Other” category, which devoted its resources to monitor, as Boyd explained, “anyone the agency deemed an anti-government ‘domestic violent extremist’ with seemingly adverse political affiliations.” Newsweek reported that while Trump supporters were not officially designated as members of this category, “government insiders acknowledge that it applies to political violence ascribed to the former president’s supporters.”

An unnamed senior intelligence official reportedly said he believes “Trump’s army constitutes the greatest threat of violence domestically … politically … that’s the reality and the problem set.”

Parents At School Board Meetings

The Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memo in October of 2021 instructing the FBI to label activist parents at school board meetings with “threat tags.” The guidance came just days after the Biden White House approved a recommendation from the National School Board Association that called for counterterrorism measures to be used against parents who spoke up at school board meetings.

Attorney General Merrick Garland “encouraged the use of an FBI tip line for individuals to flag parents for surveillance,” as my colleague Tristan Justice reported.

Tiffany Justice, co-founder of Moms for Liberty, told The Federalist of a mother who was reported to the FBI for simply being “quite upset” at a school board meeting when speaking about the adverse effects of quarantines and school closures.

Pro-Lifers

During the Biden administration, the FBI targeted 55 pro-lifers for “praying, singing, and evangelizing at abortion facilities across the U.S.,” as Boyd reported. Under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, the Biden administration targeted pro-lifers instead of targeting terrorists or the at least 90 instances of “abortion-fueled firebombing, vandalism, and other attacks on lifesaving pregnancy centers, pro-life organizations, and churches …”

In fact, 75-year-old Paulette Harlow was charged and found guilty for violating the FACE Act after she prayed at a Washington, D.C., abortion facility. Harlow was sentenced to two years in jail.

The FBI has long smeared pro-lifers as threats, with former FBI-special-agent-turned-whistleblower Steve Friend revealing in an interview with the Tennessee Informer that the FBI showed agents a video produced by the far-left Southern Poverty Law Center that, according to Friend, “ranked people who oppose abortion, pro-life activists, as a greater threat than Islamists.”

Grandmas

Imagine how much worse Wednesday’s deadly event would have been had the FBI not taken dangerous grandmothers like 71-year-old Rebecca Lavrenz off the street?

Lavrenz was recently convicted on four counts after she entered the Capitol on Jan. 6 for roughly 10 minutes, having briefly spoken to at least one Capitol Police Officer prior to exiting, according to the official statement of facts. Two FBI agents showed up to her home on April 19, 2021, returning the following week for a consensual interview. Lavrenz was sentenced to one year probation.

At least Americans can rest easy knowing threats like Lavrenz, parents at school board meetings, Trump supporters and Catholics are off the streets.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/02/heres-who-bidens-fbi-decided-to-persecute-rather-than-hunt-down-real-terrorists/