Search This Blog

Thursday, April 3, 2025

Hamas says it will release all Israeli hostages at once to end the war: report

 Hamas is ready to release all remaining 59 hostages in Gaza in exchange for a permanent cease-fire with Israel, Palestinian officials said.

As Israel ramps up its military campaign in Gaza, the terror group told negotiators it was prepared to free all its hostages so long as it gets assurance that Jerusalem will withdraw all its forces, a senior Palestinian official told the Times of Israel.

It remains to be seen if the proposal will be accepted, as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long rejected any deal that does not include Hamas’ complete defeat, including demilitarization and its permanent exit from Gaza.

Hamas is prepared to free all 59 hostages at once in exchange for a permanent end to the war in Gaza.AP
Smoke rises in Gaza’s Shujaiya neighborhood following an Israeli airstrike on Thursday.ZUMAPRESS.com

While Hamas has insisted that both sides should stick to the original US-brokered cease-fire deal in January, the terror group appears to be ready to concede that a permanent end to the fighting may not be immediately on the table.

“We had no other choice. The situation in Gaza is terrible,” the officials said about Hamas’ new position.

The terror group is allegedly open to releasing more hostages in exchange for a temporary cease-fire, Palestinian officials told the Israeli outlet.

Hamas previously agreed to a new deal proposed by US special envoy Steve Witkoff to release five hostages in exchange for another temporary truce.

Hamas has repeated that it will never agree to Israel’s demand to disarm and exit Gaza.AP

Israel, however, rejected the offer and demanded the release of 11 living hostages, as well as the bodies of 16 captives.

Hamas officials found the Israeli counter-proposal unacceptable, with negotiators for the terror group refusing to respond on Wednesday.

The terror group maintains that Israel must be open to eventually discussing a permanent cease-fire in Gaza if it wants all the hostages freed, with the Palestinian official noting that Hamas will never agree to disarm so long as Palestinian statehood is denied.

Israelis protest Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to return to war without securing the freedom of the remaining hostages.AFP via Getty Images

Until then, the peace talks are “at a standstill,” the officials added.

Hamas’ latest proposal comes as Israeli troops prepare to split the already divided sections of Gaza further, with the Israel Defense Forces carrying out a plan to seal off the city of Rafah in the south.

The operation would leave Gaza cut up into three parts, with Israel already controlling a border sealing off the north, and allow the IDF to occupy 25% of the Strip.

Israelis call on their government to secure a cease-fire deal as 24 living hostages endure 545 days in captivity.REUTERS

Following Israel’s return to war last month, Hamas has faced increasing pressure from Palestinian civilians to end the fighting and free the Israeli captives.

Civilians continue to face a humanitarian crisis over the renewed blockade on food and aid supplies, with the death toll in Gaza rising above 50,000 last week, according to the Hamas-run Ministry of Health, which does not differentiate between civilians and terrorists.

Meanwhile in Israel, Netanyahu is facing his own mass protests over the decision to return to war, as families of the hostages accused the PM of putting politics ahead of their loved ones’ safety.

There are currently 59 hostages remaining in Gaza, only 24 of whom are believed to still be alive, including Israeli American Edan Alexander.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/03/world-news/hamas-says-it-will-release-all-israeli-hostages-at-once-to-end-the-war-report/

Mellon Foundation Bankrolling Radical Activists in Higher Ed

 At Columbia University, the Racial Justice and Abolition Democracy Project created a curriculum to help college students imagine a “society without jails and prisons.” At Morgan State University, the Black Queer Everything initiative developed “transformative pedagogies” about “racism, inequality, and injustice.” And at UCLA, the Race in the Global Past through Native Lenses program promoted using “tribal critical race theory” to interpret precolonial history.

Beyond their radical bent, these programs have one thing in common: the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation funds them. The organization’s namesake made his mark on American politics a century ago as Treasury secretary. Today, his foundation injects identity politics into our universities and bankrolls the career development of activist scholars.

In past City Journal articles, I’ve shown how universities advance identitarian activists into faculty positions. I’ve reported on administrators’ clever recruiting tactics to select ideologically aligned scholars, which raise serious questions about academic freedom. This scholar-activist pipeline, I’ve shown, benefits extensively from federal funds.

But perhaps the key player in this scheme is the Mellon Foundation. Documents I’ve acquired through public records requests reveal the extent of the $8 billion behemoth’s influence on every level of higher education—and its support for the scholar-activist pipeline.

The foundation did not respond to a request for comment.

In 2020, the Mellon Foundation gave the University of California system $15 million to fund the President’s Postdoctoral Fellowship Program (PPFP). The program recruits tenure-track faculty committed to diversity. According to the UC system’s grant proposal, which I acquired through a records request, the gift would enable a “20% increase” in the fellowship program’s size.

The Mellon Foundation considers PPFP a “proof of concept” and a “model for inclusive hiring nationwide.” As I’ve reported, this fellow-to-faculty model—where universities hire postdocs who show a “commitment to diversity,” then give them a leg up for tenure-track jobs—is indeed widely utilized across the country.

 “PPFP really is a very powerful engine for transforming the professoriate of the future,” Douglas Haynes, the UC vice provost for academic personnel and programs, told the foundation in an article. A quick glance at the program’s fellows reveals what a fully transformed professoriate might look like.

Cinthya Martinez’s doctoral dissertation, for example, “ICE on Fire: Incinerating Prison/Border Violence through Feminist Abolition Geographies,” uses “a haunting methodology to investigate how gendered and queered migrants inside ICE detention use ‘haunted-ness’ and place-making to unsettle detention.” Yessica Garcia Hernandez’s scholarship includes “The making of fat erotics: the cultural work and pleasures of gordibuena activists,” published in the journal Fat Studies. Both Martinez and Garcia Hernandez received PPFP fellowships and are now tenure-track professors in the UC system.

Mellon money is all over the UC system. In 2020, Mellon gave UCLA $5 million to build the “UCLA Mellon Social Justice Curriculum.” According to a proposal document I obtained, UCLA pledged to set aside $2.4 million to pay PPFP fellows’ salaries as tenure-track professors. In another proposal, for the $1 million Race in the Global Past through Native Lenses project, UCLA promised to hire four former PPFP fellows for tenure-track jobs. UC Santa Cruz’s Visualizing Abolition initiative promised to model its own fellowship after PPFP; Mellon awarded it nearly $8 million.

Some of these initiatives raise legal red flags. In its “Race and the Global Past” proposal, UCLA promised to hire “Native and Indigenous” fellows. If that phrase simply refers to scholars’ tribal membership, then the scheme may pass legal muster. But in a job announcement for one of the fellowships, UCLA notes that the prospective hire will be part of a “cohort composed of Native American, Pacific Islander and/or other Indigenous community scholars-in-residence.” The set-aside for Pacific Islanders, American Civil Rights Project executive director Dan Morenoff said, “appears to straightforwardly violate Title VII’s prohibition on hiring individuals because of their race.” He added: “It’s very hard to imagine how the ‘Race in the Global Past through Native Lenses’ project could be legal.”

The Mellon Foundation has helped extend the fellow-to-faculty model throughout the country. Since 2013, Mellon has given the University of Chicago more than $2 million for its Provost’s Postdoctoral Fellowship. In 2020, it provided the University of Virginia with $5 million for its Race, Place, and Equity program, which sponsors 30 “postdoctoral-to-faculty fellowships.” In 2022, it gave Wayne State University $6 million for a “cluster hire”—hiring multiple professors at once—of 30 professors as a part of its Black Studies Faculty Enhancement Initiative. Ten of those new professors would come through a fellow-to-faculty program.

Many Mellon gifts for other purposes smuggle in fellow-to-faculty roles. The foundation’s $2 million Rebuilding Black Studies grant to Ohio State University, for example, sponsors three fellow-to-faculty postdocs. That includes a recently advertised position for a scholar who will examine “the intersection of blackness/nativeness, inequality, distributive (in)justice, and colonial/postcolonial histories.”

Mellon Foundation funding shapes every rung of the higher education ladder, not just academic hiring. Dozens of universities—including HarvardColumbia, and Princeton—host a Mellon Mays Undergraduate Fellowship. The plan gives a stipend and academic mentoring to undergraduates interested in social-justice issues. The goal is to prepare them for graduate school.

By the program’s own metrics, Mellon Mays is a success. More than 850 recipients are now college professors or instructors. “A critical mass of MMUF PhDs is now transforming teaching and scholarship in the humanities and social sciences,” its website boasts.

These fellows are often interested in “intersectionality.” One current Mellon Mays fellow at UT Austin chose to study “anti-colonial workings of thought, revolution, and behavior” in part because of “his experiences in a mixed-ethnic neuroqueercrip body,” according to the program’s webpage.

The Mellon Foundation also bankrolls a range of leadership development initiatives, some with explicitly racial goals. One example is Breaking the M.O.L.D. (Maryland Opportunities for Leadership Development) for Arts and Humanities Faculty, a $3 million Mellon-funded project at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. The initiative awards fellowships to accelerate recipients’ “path to senior leadership” and is specifically designed for “faculty members of color and women from the Arts and Humanities as well as others with a proven record of promoting diversity within the academy,” according to the proposal.

The cumulative result of the Mellon Foundation’s efforts is an interconnected network within academia—students, faculty, and administrators—who share affinities and often seem to know one another.

Keith Claybrook, a California State University, Long Beach professor, participates in the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education’s Academy for Leaders in the Humanities. Mellon funds the program. Claybrook’s scholarship includes “Becoming an Africana Activist Scholar: David C. Turner, III and Black Graduate Student Activism as Professional Development, A Case Study.” This paper documents the activism of UCLA professor David Turner, who, as I’ve reported, also participated in PPFP.

Mellon funding can follow scholar-activists through their careers. Consider LaVelle Ridley, an Ohio State professor. Ridley’s research, as one speaker bio put it, “focuses on the radical cultural politics of black transgender women . . . and advances an anti-capitalist, prison abolitionist agenda.” That agenda is Mellon-funded. As an undergraduate, Ridley was a Schomburg-Mellon Humanities Fellow. After graduate school, Ridley became a fellow at UC Berkeley through the Mellon-backed PPFP, researching the topic of “black trans insurgency.” In 2024, Ridley began as a professor of queer and transgender studies at Ohio State, a faculty role created as a part of a series of cluster hires focused on “race, inclusion, and social equity.” That year, Ridley’s department received a grant from the Mellon Foundation and promised to “prioritize feminist leadership while supporting the critical study of race, gender and sexuality.”

As a professor at Ohio’s flagship university, Ridley continues to participate in, and benefit from, the Mellon Foundation’s extensive network of activist-inflected, career-advancing programs. Take Mellon’s work on gender. In 2024, Mellon gave the University of Kansas $1 million for its Trans Studies at the Commons project. The grant proposal, which I acquired and previously reported on, states applicants’ intention to “galvanize efforts aimed at . . . social justice today.” Specifically, program administrators promised to fight laws restricting “gender affirming care.”

One key goal of Trans Studies at the Commons is to expand transgender studies. To that end, it created a virtual fellowship that would dole out small research grants to “scholar-activists” throughout the country. Ridley was selected as one of the program’s first fellows.

Another beneficiary of Mellon dollars was San Francisco’s Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Historical Society. The group received $1.5 million to administer a program called Transgender Educational Network: Theory in Action for Creativity, Liberation, Empowerment, and Service, or—fittingly—TENTACLES. In an interview for the Bay Area Reporter, TENTACLES creator Susan Stryker described its purpose as “tak[ing] some of the Mellon Foundation’s largesse and put[ting] as much of that money as possible in the pockets of people who are doing really grassroots, community-based activism.” Administrators chose Ridley, who did not respond to a request for comment, as one of five steering committee members to select projects to fund.

The Mellon connection goes further still. Of the 21 initial TENTACLES grant recipients that Ridley helped select, two are PPFP fellows. One is Dan Bustillo, a President’s and Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow at UC Riverside who conducts research on “trans Latinx activist media.” The other is Jemma Decristo, a professor at UC Davis. As of January, DeCristo was still under investigation by UC Davis for posting threats against “zionist” journalists.

After I made several requests to universities for records related to the TENTACLES initiative, the program took its webpage offline.

Mellon money, and the network of scholar-activists that it funds, has contributed to higher education’s radical left-wing bent. University students, faculty, and administrators act like tenured activists in part because they’re recruited and funded to do just that. Arising from a decades-long personnel building project, the problem defies simple solutions. As I’ll outline when this series concludes, it calls for a decades-long program of institutional renewal.

Our Electric Rates Continue to Climb Because of Greedy Utilities and Climate Grift

 We are continually told so much about our electric systems that simply isn’t true. 

This means that we are paying more for our electricity than we should, and utilities and green grifters are the reason. The green grift is based on the misinformation that life-giving CO2—that we must breath in and exhale with every breath—that is greening our world and increasing crop yields must be lowered. Somehow, this will stop global warming and make our weather better.

We are told wind and solar will lower our electric costs. It is just the opposite.

Wind produces electricity about 30% of the time and solar 20% of the time. Solar produces little or no electricity for the first and last hour of the day, which is important because our daily peak demand is from about 5 to 9 PM. This means on demand electricity must ramp up when the sun is setting or out go the lights.

If there is a lot of solar electricity, the natural gas plants run part-time or in spinning reserve. This is running at idle, using fuel without selling any electricity, causing them to charge more.

It is like keeping your car idling to rescue part-time solar or wind cars.

To use an analogy, a family has gas cars that serve their needs. They buy wind and solar powered cars that only work when the wind blows or the sun shines—and because the government pays half. 

Their cost of cars just went up tremendously, which is exactly what is happening to our electric grids. 

Adding wind and solar to our electric grid means that we have to pay for them and for the on demand natural gas, coal, and nuclear power. This is expensive.

Wind and solar get a 50% tax subsidy to build and production subsidies for the electricity they make. 

It is even worse because the electric grids pay the highest price for all electricity including lowest bidders. Due to government subsidies, wind and solar always bid lowest, so they are always chosen first. They are then paid the highest price the grid pays, and there are no savings whatsoever from adding so-called “cheaper” subsidized wind and solar. 

It would be like Amazon hiring a number of companies to provide delivery services and asking them to bid, and then paying all of them the highest price that was bid. This practice needs to end.

It gets worse. When electric utilities spend a billion dollars adding industrial sized solar panel installations, they get 50% of that back in taxpayer subsidies. 

They then add a guaranteed capital rate of return, typically 8 to 12% in profits on the money they borrowed to build it. Electric utility customers must pay higher prices for this guaranteed profit, even though the electric utility is really only spending half as much of the money they borrow to build it.

Legislators need to change this too. Paying guaranteed profits on government subsidies drives up electricity costs and isn’t fair to ratepayers or taxpayers.

It doesn’t stop there. Since utility companies get this guaranteed profit on money they borrow for electric plants, they are incentivized to close plants before they have served their full useful life. 

Often, they have hundreds of millions in outstanding bonds for the closed electric plants they borrowed the money for, which incentivizes utilities to close plants before they serve their full-useful life and build new ones. This is why they close down coal plants and replace them with natural gas plants—this is the green grift we pay for in our electric rates.

They use the climate scam as an excuse.

Electricity users should not have to continue to pay for profits on the loans that are outstanding for closed plants. Utilities shouldn’t get money for nothing, especially profits from plants that no longer exist.

States need to end this practice as well. 

Never mind that China and India are building hundreds of coal plants, because coal is low-cost and reliable. They then sell us 80% of the things needed for the green grift because they can make them cheaper. Real pollution and CO2 emissions continue to climb, and we pay more for energy. 

Electric users need our elected leaders to correct these injustices. We are paying more for our electricity every month than we should because of these practices and unnecessary climate policies.

Frank Lasee is president of Truth in Energy and Climate and a former Wisconsin State Senator. 

https://www.realclearpolicy.com/articles/2025/04/03/our_electric_rates_continue_to_climb_because_of_greedy_utilities_and_climate_grift_1101708.html