Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

News outlets in crisis mode as Google-led AI search push crushes website traffic

 Major news outlets are in crisis mode as artificial intelligence chatbots pushed by Google and other Big Tech giants crush website traffic.

Google has rolled out an “AI Overviews” feature in its search engine that demotes traditional “blue links” to other sites in favor of auto-generated summaries. Last month, the search giant rolled out “AI Mode” – which is expected to make the problem even worse by responding to search queries with chatbot-style conversations and few direct links.

Nicholas Thompson, the CEO of news outlet The Atlantic, told employees earlier this year that they should assume traffic from Google will drop toward zero over time, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday.

“Google is shifting from being a search engine to an answer engine,” Thompson told the Journal. “We have to develop new strategies.” 

Google CEO Sundar Pichai recently rolled out AI Mode for search.AFP via Getty Images

Dwindling traffic is hurting revenue for cash-strapped newsrooms and fueling layoffs. When Business Insider slashed 21% of its staff in a newsroom-wide culling last month, its top boss Barbara Peng said the move was meant to help “endure extreme traffic drops outside of our control.”

Traffic to Business Insider’s website plunged by a whopping 55% from April 2022 to April 2025, according to data from analytics sites Similarweb cited by the Journal.

HuffPost has also lost more than half of its traffic over the same period, the data showed, while the Washington Post – another newsroom racked by job cuts – has lost nearly half its search audience.

The rollout of AI-generated summaries in place of links “is a serious threat to journalism that should not be underestimated,” Washington Post CEO William Lewis said.

Despite the traffic losses, Google has claimed that it is still funneling traffic to news sites through search.

 “Every day, we send billions of clicks to websites, and connecting people to the web continues to be a priority,” a Google spokesperson said in a statement. “New experiences like AI Overviews and AI Mode enhance Search and expand the types of questions people can ask, which creates new opportunities for content to be discovered.”

AI features are hurting search traffic for news outlets.REUTERS

Critics, such as the News Media Alliance – a trade group that represents hundreds of news outlets including The Post – has warned that AI Overviews and other Google-implemented AI features will have devastating consequences for the industry.

They allege that Google and other AI giants have used news content to train their chatbots without proper credit or compensation – and then used those same products to erode traffic.

Danielle Coffey, the CEO and president of News Media Alliance, blasted Googles’ rollout of AI Mode last month as “theft.”

“Links were the last redeeming quality of search that gave publishers traffic and revenue,” Coffey said. “Now Google just takes content by force and uses it with no return, the definition of theft. The DOJ remedies must address this to prevent continued domination of the internet by one company.”

Google CEO Sundar Pichai is pictured.AFP via Getty Images

The AI push comes as Google faces intense pressure from the feds over its business model – including losses in a pair of antitrust cases brought by the DOJ that could force a breakup of the company.

US District Judge Amit Mehta is set to decide by August on how to break up Google’s illegal dominance over online search after labeling the company as a “monopolist” in an initial ruling last year. DOJ lawyers want Mehta to consider the future impact of AI when crafting remedies.

Elsewhere, Google recently lost a separate DOJ case in which it was determined to have two illegal monopolies over digital advertising technology.

In that case, US District Judge Leonie Brinkema touched on the impact to news outlets, finding that Google’s “exclusionary conduct substantially harmed Google’s publisher customers, the competitive process, and, ultimately, consumers of information on the open web.”

The remedy phase of the digital ad tech trial will begin in September.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/10/business/news-outlets-in-crisis-mode-as-google-led-ai-search-push-crushes-website-traffic/

Urban NYS Dems want to limit how many cows dairy farms can own in latest green push

 This new cow bill is total bull.

State lawmakers from the Big Apple want to limit the number of cows on dairy farms in their latest green push – a proposal that opponents argue would cripple the industry.

The legislation, whose backers include members of the Democratic Socialists of America, would prohibit new or expanding dairy farms from reaching or exceeding 700 cows, a measure supporters said would improve the environment and help smaller family farms across the Empire State.

The law would limit the number of cows to new or expanding farms to 700.Annie Wermiel/NY Post

But the proposed moo-ve has sparked an upstate-downstate beef between lawmakers from rural and urban districts — with even Gov. Kathy Hochul viewing the bill as “insane,” according to a source close to the Democratic leader.

“Let’s be clear: this bill makes no sense,” Sen. Mark Walczyk (R-Jefferson) said in a statement.

“By restricting dairy farm expansions, we are undermining successful farmers in an industry that is already incredibly challenging. Why are New York City lawmakers trying to create mandates for farmers in our rural communities? They have no business doing so.”

Among the backers of the bill are a pair of DSA legislators, state Sen. Jabari Brisport (D-Brooklyn) and state Assemblywoman Emily Gallagher (D-Brooklyn), as well as Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal (D-Manhattan), Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon (D-Brooklyn) and Assemblywoman Amy Paulin (D-Westchester.)

The lefty lawmakers argue large-scale factory farms, which are given Concentrated Animal Farming Operations permits, cause numerous environmental problems, including manure that runs into waterways and greenhouse gases.

Brisport says the law would help the environment and smaller farms.Katie Godowski/MediaPunch / Shutterstock

They also claim sprawling dairy farms hurt smaller, family-run farms – a claim that was rebuked by critics.

“Factory farming is rapidly taking over in New York, and it’s creating dangerous contamination of our water and air. We have to stop the out-of-control growth of these industrial mega-farms,” Brisport said in a statement.

The senator’s office said the state has lost about two-thirds of family-scale dairies between 2002 and 2022 because of the rise of factory farming.

The bill, which would not force farms to lose any cows they already have, has little chance of clearing the state Senate and Assembly — and even if it did, Hochul would not sign it, according the source close to the governor.

Rosenthal is leading the charge in the assembly.Lev Radin / Shutterstock

The governor’s office declined comment on the legislation.

Critics claim Brisport and Rosenthal – the two sponsors of the bill – don’t understand how farming and upstate agriculture work.

“Our family-run, sometimes women-owned farms take great pride in caring for our land, animals, and communities,” said Jefferson County Agricultural Coordinator Jay Matteson in a statement provided by Walczyk’s office.

“Many of these farms provide important income to minorities and disadvantaged people.”

GOP House Rep. Elise Stefanik, who is eyeing a run for governor, called out the legislation as did a rival looking to pick up her congressional seat.

Stefanik called the proposal an “ant-farm bill” while Democrat Blake Gendebien, a St. Lawrence County farmer, complained “New York City Dems don’t get agriculture.”

Walczyk said state lawmakers from the city should focus on the five boroughs and “leave Upstate out of it.”

“Our farmers deserve support, not obstacles,” he stated. “This legislation will drive farms out of New York altogether.”

https://nypost.com/2025/06/10/us-news/urban-nys-dems-want-to-limit-how-many-cows-dairy-farms-can-own-in-latest-green-push-sparking-upstate-downstate-beef/

NY state Senate approves doctor-assisted suicide bill, sends it to Hochul’s desk

 State Senate Democrats passed highly controversial legislation that would allow terminally ill people to take their own lives with the help of doctors in a razor-thin vote Monday — leaving it up to Gov. Kathy Hochul whether to sign it into law.

“This is one of the great social reforms of our state,” state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal (D-Manhattan), the bill’s sponsor in the upper chamber, touted at a press conference earlier in the day Monday — putting the measure on the same tier as the legalization of gay marriage.

“This is about personal autonomy, this is about liberty, this is about exercising one’s own freedom to control one’s body,” Hoylman-Sigal continued.

The “Medical Aid in Dying Act” passed the state senate Monday evening, meaning it only needs Gov. Kathy Hochul’s signature to become law.Vaughn Golden

The measure passed 35 to 27, with six Democrats – Senators April Baskin, Siela Bynoe, Cordelle Cleare, Monica Martinez, Roxanne Persaud, and Sam Sutton – voting against it. 

“The governor will review the legislation,” a spokesperson for Hochul said.

The bill’s passage follows a years-long campaign that was fought tooth and nail by a diverse group of critics, including disability rights activists and the Catholic church, as well as many black and Orthodox Jewish communities.

“The Governor still has the opportunity to uphold New York’s commitment to suicide prevention, protect vulnerable communities, and affirm that every life—regardless of disability, age, or diagnosis—is worthy of care, dignity, and protection,” The New York Alliance Against Assisted Suicide wrote in a statement following the vote.

A Catholic group slammed the bill’s passing as “a dark day for New York” and also called on Hochul to refuse to sign it.

“For the first time in its history, New York is on the verge of authorizing doctors to help their patients commit suicide. Make no mistake – this is only the beginning, and the only person standing between New York and the assisted suicide nightmare unfolding in Canada is Governor Hochul,” Dennis Poust, Executive Director of the New York State Catholic Conference, wrote in a statement.

The state Senate voted 35-27 Monday night to legalize physician-assisted suicide for people with terminal illnesses.AP

Ahead of the vote, the nearly three-hour debate on the Senate floor got emotional, with several lawmakers holding back tears as they explained their votes.

Syracuse-area state Sen. Rachel May (D-Onondaga) shared the story of her late husband, who was receiving morphine in the final stages of his battle with cancer, which he eventually succumbed to at 32 years old.

“I don’t know if the last largest dose he took also took his life, but I know that he died in peace,” May said.

“It isn’t about controlling the disease or controlling the pain, it’s about having control at the end of your life,” she said before voting in favor.

Critics fear the legislation lacks critical safeguards over how doctors approve patients looking to receive the prescription for a lethal cocktail of drugs, such as a statutory waiting period, establishing clear chain of custody for the pills, mandating the doctor and recipient meet in-person, and requiring a disclosure that someone indeed used the drugs to take their own life.

Under the bill, recipients would need approval from two doctors and a sign-off from two independent witnesses, after which they would receive a prescription for drugs they could use to take their life at a time of their choosing.

Gov. Kathy Hochul has not signaled whether she will sign the assisted suicide bill.Lev Radin/ZUMA / SplashNews.com

Doctors also do not have to conduct a mental health screening for each patient, but may refer a patient for one under the legislation.

“I don’t think requesting end-of-life medication when an individual is suffering and in pain and dying suggests a mental health condition, if anything, I think it’s quite rational,” Hoylman-Sigal said.

Hoylman vowed the bill would not lead to such “unintended consequences.”

“It was a professional organization that provided us crucial guidance, that helped us develop the state-of-the-art safeguards in this legislation that gave my colleagues and the general public, I believe, the assurance that there will not be unintended consequences,” he said.

The legislation is referred to by its supporters as the “Medical Aid in Dying” bill.

“The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end. I am profoundly grateful to Senate Majority Leader Stewart-Cousins for giving her conference the space to have this important and emotional discussion,” Corinne Carey, Senior Campaign Director of Compassion and Choices, the main group driving the effort to pass the bill, wrote in a statement.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/10/us-news/ny-state-senate-approves-doctor-assisted-suicide-for-terminally-ill-bill-sends-it-to-hochuls-desk/