Search This Blog

Saturday, June 28, 2025

Taiwan VP says will not be intimidated after Czech says China planned physical intimidation

 Chinese diplomats and secret service followed Taiwan's Vice-President-elect Hsiao Bi-khim and planned to intimidate her physically when she visited Prague last year, Czech military intelligence said on Friday.

Hsiao visited the Czech Republic in March 2024. Prague does not have official diplomatic ties with Taiwan but has fostered warm relations with the democratically-governed island, which China views as its own territory.

Czech media reported last year that a Chinese diplomat had run a red light when following her car. Czech public radio news website irozhlas.cz said on Thursday that the Chinese had also planned to stage a demonstrative car crash.

Czech Military Intelligence spokesman said Chinese diplomats in Prague had taken actions that violated diplomatic rules.

"This consisted of physically following the vice-president, gathering information on her schedule and attempts to document her meetings with important representatives of the Czech political and public scene," spokesman Jan Pejsek said in emailed comments to Reuters.

"We even recorded an attempt by the Chinese civil secret service to create conditions to perform a demonstrative kinetic action against a protected person, which however did not go beyond the phase of preparation."

A spokesperson for China's foreign ministry, commenting on the matter, denied any wrongdoing by Chinese diplomats and also said the Czech Republic had interfered in China's internal affairs by allowing Hsiao's visit to go ahead.

The Czech Foreign Ministry said it had summoned the Chinese ambassador over the incident at the time but did not comment further on Friday.

TAIWAN PROTESTS

Taiwan's China-policy making Mainland Affairs Council said the Chinese actions "seriously threatened the personal safety of Vice President Hsiao and her entourage".

"The Mainland Affairs Council today protested and strongly condemned the Chinese communist's bad behaviour and demanded that the Chinese side should immediately explain and publicly apologise," it said.

In Beijing, foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said: "Chinese diplomats have always abided by the laws and regulations of the countries in which they are stationed."

"China urges the parties concerned not to be provoked and exploited by separatist forces for Taiwan independence, and to not make a fuss over nothing, engage in malicious speculation, and interfere with and undermine the relations between the two countries."

Hsiao assumed office, along with President Lai Ching-te, on May 20 last year.

Czech relations with China have cooled in recent years. The Czechs accused China in May of being behind a cyberattack on the foreign ministry.

Czech politicians have visited Taiwan and former Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen visited Prague last October.

https://www.aol.com/news/czechs-china-followed-planned-intimidation-103511035.html

Yes, the U.S. 'Obliterated' Iran's Nuclear Capabilities

 


The press has had a field day since an anti-Trumper inside the U.S. intelligence community leaked a preliminary Defense Intelligence Agency assessment of the B-2 bomber strike on Iran's deeply-buried uranium enrichment site at Fordo.

The New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, and others all selectively cited the preliminary report, labelled "low confidence" (a caveat they of course omitted to tell their readers), which said the strikes may only have inflicted moderate damage on Fordo.

To counter that, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth brought out the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, who gave an in-depth description of the attacks and the 16 years of preparation, intelligence, and weapons design that went into them.

Among the astonishing things we learned from General Caine was that the GBU-57 deep-penetrating bomb used to attack the Iranian enrichment site had been specifically designed for precisely this task.

The GBU-57 was not just some off-the-shelf bomb that the Pentagon decided to use in hopes it would work: it was designed to take out Fordo, and tested hundreds of times in realistic environments to evaluate how well it would accomplish that task.

General Caine also revealed that the United States has been tracking Fordo since it first learned the Iranians were going to build a deeply-buried nuclear plant in 2009, and assigned two officers from the Pentagon’s Defense Thread Reduction Agency (DTRA) to monitor it.

"In 2009, a [DTRA] officer was brought into a vault at an undisclosed location and briefed on something going on in Iran," Caine said. "He was shown some photos and some highly classified intelligence of what looked like a major construction project in the mountains of Iran. He was tasked to study this facility, work with the intelligence community to understand it, and he was soon joined by an additional teammate." 

The two studied satellite photographs of the site during construction, equipping, and operations over the next fifteen years.

They studied the excavation equipment, the tailings, and the size of the ventilation shafts. Eventually they came to the conclusion that the United States had no conventional weapon that could penetrate the 250 feet of granite protecting the underground production halls and destroy them.

"They began a journey to work with industry and other tacticians to develop the GBU-57," Caine revealed. "They tested it over and over again, tried different options, tried more after that -- they accomplished hundreds of test shots and dropped many full-scale weapons against extremely realistic targets, for a single purpose: kill this target at the time and place of our nation's choosing." 

Think about that for a second. For over fifteen years the United States has been tracking this one particular site in Iran, because it was crystal clear to most analysts that it was dedicated to making a nuclear weapon.

And yet, the intelligence community as a whole continued to assess, as Tulsi Gabbard told Congress in March, that Iran did not have a nuclear weapons program.

Either that was a massive subterfuge, or our intelligence community is peopled by political creatures who actually want to see Iran develop a nuclear weapon. Neither option is very pretty.

General Caine made clear that the military doesn't do its own bomb-damage assessments, so he refrained from qualifying the success of Operation Midnight Hammer, leaving that for the intelligence community.

But he could say with confidence what he knew: the weapons were "built, tested and delivered properly; they were released on-speed and on-parameter; they were all guided to their intended targets; and the weapons all functioned as designed," he said.

"We know that the trailing jets saw the first weapons function, and the pilot stated, 'this was the brightest explosion that I've ever seen. It literally looked like daylight,'" Caine said. 

Fordo's weakness was its ventilation system. General Caine explained that the Iranians covered the main ventilation shafts with fresh "caps" of cement to thwart an attack just two days before the B-2s struck.

But the U.S. was ready for them.

"The cap was forcibly removed by the first weapon," he said, "and the main shaft was uncovered. Weapons two, three, four, five, were tasked to enter the main shaft, move down into the complex at greater than one thousand feet per second, and explode in the mission space," Pentagon jargon for the main uranium centrifuge enrichment hall 240 feet below ground.

"Weapon number six was designed as a flex weapon, to allow us to cover if one of the preceding jets, or one of the preceding weapons, did not work," he said.

Six weapons were launched on each of the ventilation shafts, twelve in all, for a total of 360,000 pounds of steel and high explosive.

"Unlike a surface bomb, you won't see a surface crater," he explained, because they are designed to penetrate deeply before exploding.

"All six weapons, at each vent at Fordo, went exactly where they were intended to go," Caine said.

If anyone wants to see just how much damage the U.S. inflicted on Iran's premier uranium enrichment facility, they were going to need a pretty big shovel, Secretary Hegseth added.

Meanwhile, the Israelis revealed their own list of targets destroyed. 

In the twelve-day campaign they crippled another enrichment plant at Natanz, the uranium conversion plant in Isfahan, and took out more than half of Iran's long-range missile launchers.

They destroyed missile and drone production plants, pulverized multiple facilities where Iran was producing uranium enrichment centrifuges, as well as the secret bomb plant at Parchin, just south of Tehran, that the Iranians repeatedly refused to allow international inspectors to view.

In addition, they eliminated the top dozen nuclear weapons designers and engineers in Iran, and another dozen top military leaders in charge of the nuclear and missile programs. While they were at it, they leveled a dozen IRGC and bassij bases, and blew open the door of the regime's main political prison, Evin.

In any ordinary sense of the word, the U.S. and Israel have obliterated Iran's nuclear weapons program. Any attempt by the Iranian regime to reconstitute it in the coming years would constitute a transparent effort to acquire nuclear weapons.

The legend of Iran's "civilian" nuclear program was buried once and for all during the 12-Day war. The days of pretending Iran had benign intentions are over.

Timmerman is a senior fellow at the America First Policy Institute. His latest work of non-fiction, The Iran House: Tales of Revolution, Persecution, War, and Intrigue, was recently published by Bombardier Books 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/06/yes_the_us_obliterated_iran_s_nuclear_capabilities.html

The Untold Reason for Mamdani’s Mayoral Win

 


The New York City mayoral Democrat primary race results have shaken the political world.

Candidate Zohran Mamdani, described as a Marxist Muslim, was five months ago languishing in also-ran territory at one percent in the polls. A most recent poll then showed him, to pundits’ surprise, beating erstwhile-front-runner (a whole week ago) Andrew Cuomo after the eighth round of ranked-choice calculations. But it was wrong.

Mamdani won the first-round tally by more than seven points and will assuredly be the Democrat nominee.

How did this happen? There are many reasons, but the overriding one is something overlooked, something indispensable, something that is a gift: charisma.

This is where those who dislike Mamdani — and I’m one of them (I actually consider him immoral) — must be careful. People are generally loath to give those they dislike credit; they view them through tinted glasses. But studies have shown what the Throughline media-training blog stated years ago in no uncertain terms: “The Most Charismatic Candidate Always Wins.”

I suspect the hard-Left has discovered this truth, too. Why do you think suburban girl Sandy Cortez (a.k.a. AOC) was chosen to be the Justice Democrats’ candidate in 2017 via what essentially was an audition? Yes, she really was.

Style Over Substance

Now, again, multiple factors contributed to Mamdani’s victory. He went the Full Monty on socialism, promising everything from freezing rent to defunding the police to free mass transit to a $30 minimum wage to city-owned grocery stores (yeah, the Soviets had those, too). He captured fellow Asian-descent residents, left-wing whites and (mis)educated voters, and the latter two groups do just love the latest shiny “progressive” thing.

It’s also true that only about 20 percent of eligible voters cast ballots. This means that the ones who did were, inordinately, those passionate about politics — and few were passionate about traditionally corrupt Andrew Cuomo. Many, however, were passionate about ideologically corrupt Mamdani. (Yes, embracing evil ideology is a form of corruption).

Nonetheless, even all these factors taken together can’t explain his meteoric rise.

Charisma does, though.

In 2011, I wrote “That Presidential Look: The Bad, the Beautiful and Voting-booth Realities,” which explained the importance of candidates’ appearance in our T.V. age.

Charisma goes along with that. As Throughline pointed out (in 2012), the more charismatic candidate had prevailed in every presidential election since 1980.

Just consider:

  • 1980 and ’84—Ronald Reagan defeated, respectively, Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale.
  • 1988—George H.W. Bush bested the even less charismatic Michael Dukakis.
  • 1992 and ’96—Bill Clinton won over, respectively, G.H.W. Bush and Bob Dole, the latter of whom was, as pundit Pat Buchanan put it, “like Richard Nixon — without the charm.”
  • 2000 and ’04: George W. Bush defeated, respectively, Al Gore and John Kerry.
  • 2008 and ’12: Barack Obama bested, respectively, cranky John McCain and stately-looking but somewhat stiff Mitt Romney.
  • 2016: In a historic upset, Donald Trump toppled Hillary Clinton, the antithesis of charisma.

This brings us to 2020 and ’24, where Trump and Joe Biden each captured one contest. Biden did have some charisma in his prime, but in 2020 was a mere shell of his former self. But I’m convinced that year’s election was stolen, so I don’t consider it an exception to the rule. (If you do, fine; call it an anomaly.)

Now, again, this is where I must caution partisans against reacting emotionally. The TDS types will recoil at associating Trump with charisma. And, yes, he does get testy sometimes. Watch one of his rallies, however, and you’ll see how he masterfully works a crowd. I’ve never seen anyone do it better.

On the other side, many may, as I do, find Obama and Bill Clinton (and any other left-wing demagogue) nauseating. But this is because such observers are looking beneath the surface and/or are conceiving of the person based on his policies. This is a mistake professional pundits often make, too. They’re politics wonks and project their own mindset, as humans will do, onto others.

Yet most voters aren’t conversant with politics; they make decisions on emotional bases. For example, if you knew little about Obama’s background or policies in 2008 and merely looked at and listened to him, you saw this: a decent-looking guy with a nice, resonant voice — and some charisma. Note when assessing this, too, that it’s as with what’s said about when you and a companion are fleeing from a vicious grizzly. You don’t have to outrun the bear.

You just have to outrun your companion.

(I.e., Obama’s competitors weren’t exactly charm school valedictorians.)

As for Mamdani, he not only could outrun Cuomo; he may leave the bear eating dust. Just consider, for instance, the first few minutes of the below interview with him. And imagine watching it as, let’s say, a kindly, apolitical grandmother who doesn’t know his positions or background.

Grandma’s first thought likely would be, “What a nice young man! He’d be perfect for my granddaughter!” Mamdani is photogenic enough, has an easy, contagious smile—and loads of charisma. As one commenter under the video put it, “I see how he beat Cuomo now. Wow[,] is he smooth!”

My point, again, is not to sing his praises, but to sound an alarm and send a message.

Mamdani is dangerous not just because his policies and attitudes are toxic, but because he’s a quintessential wolf in sheep’s clothing. It also occurs to me that just as sports competition is tougher than ever with today’s deep talent pools, so may competition in the political arena be because of high-tech media. The T.V. age made appearance and personality important; now the internet and social media age, with video exposure ad infinitum, have made those qualities imperative.

So the message is this: If Republicans want to win elections, ideological soundness is not enough (though it’s a prerequisite for governing). They also should choose candidates possessing that star quality, that special something, that charisma. If the person couldn’t conceivably carry a podcast, he perhaps can’t carry an election.

This said, I certainly wish the above weren’t so. I wish people would vote based on knowledge and wisdom and not fancies and fandom. But too many don’t. Consequently, nominating a candidate competent but as exciting as watching paint dry just won’t cut it.

Charisma is the one thing Trump, Mamdani and Cortez all have in common. Never underestimate such a person, either. Because in politics, charisma is king.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/06/the_untold_reason_for_mamdani_s_mayoral_win.html

'Russian Military Instructs China How To Beat US & NATO Weapons'

 One key trend to have emerged over the course of the Russia-Ukraine war is that China, Iran, and Russia are increasingly and very openly cooperating militarily and technologically, including Moscow sharing experience gained in the course of its Ukraine ground operations.

Newsweek reports that "Russia plans to train hundreds of Chinese military personnel this year on lessons learned from its ongoing invasion of Ukraine," based on regional sources. Some of what has been 'learned' is how to defend against US-made and NATO-supplied weaponry - something which Beijing is surely interested in amid the long-running Taiwan standoff with Washington.

Kremlin file image

"Instructors will cover methods for countering weapons systems used by Ukrainian forces that were produced by the United States and its NATO allies, a source in Ukraine's top intelligence agency told the outlet," the Newsweek report continues.

Specifically 'lessons for a Taiwan conflict' would be gleaned:

This training would further strengthen security ties between Russia and its "no limits" ally China, which in recent years has stepped up joint military exercises. Battlefield insights into U.S. weaponry could offer an advantage as China seeks to surpass the U.S. as the leading military power in the Indo-Pacific.

And Ukraine's Defense Intelligence Directorate has told local media, the Kyiv Post, that "The Kremlin has decided to allow Chinese military personnel to study and adopt the combat experience Russia has gained in its war against Ukraine."

Not only have Russian forces destroyed and disabled possibly dozens of Western-supplied main battle tanks, including M1 Abrams, UK Challengers, and French Leopard 2's - but F16s have also been shot down.

American troop carriers have additionally been destroyed, and in some places Western armored vehicles have been put on display in the capital of Moscow, as trophies recovered from the battlefield.

Meanwhile, China this week hosted defense ministers from Iran and Russia for a meeting in its eastern seaside city of Qingdao.

The meeting happened Thursday, and importantly Qingdao is home to a major Chinese naval base, with the country's defense minister Dong Jun calling the PLA Navy and its bases a counterweight to a world in "chaos and instability."

"As momentous changes of the century accelerate, unilateralism and protectionism are on the rise," Dong said. Alongside defense chiefs from Russia and Iran, the military leaders of Pakistan and Belarus were also present.

He was further quoted in news agency Xinhua as decrying "Hegemonic, domineering and bullying acts" which "severely undermine the international order." The comments were clearly aimed at the Western alliance, and Washington in particular.

China over the course of this month's Israeli and US bombings of Iran has condemned what it sees as blatant aggression against a non-nuclear power which was engaged in good faith negotiations. Beijing has also in the past issued statements calling out NATO for its constant expansion, and activity which has even been lately introduced in the Pacific region, and growing ties to Japan.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russian-military-instructs-china-how-beat-us-nato-weapons

Trump on Sunday Morning Futures, June 29

 NewsNation’s “The Hill Sunday”: Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.); Rep. Lori Trahan (D-Mass.); Former ambassador to New Zealand and Samoa Carol Moseley Braun.

ABC’s “This Week”: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.); Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.).

NBC’s “Meet the Press”: Sens. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.); Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.); Zohran Mamdani, Democratic candidate for New York mayor.

CNN’s “State of the Union”: Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.); Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.); Rep. Riley Moore (R-W.Va.).

CBS’ “Face the Nation”: Warner; Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas); International Atomic Energy Agency Director-General Rafael Mariano Grossi; former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb.

“Fox News Sunday”: Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.); Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.).

Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures”: President Trump.

https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/5375332-sunday-shows-preview-senate-dems-dig-in-heels-to-delay-trump-megabill-vote-as-gop-whips-holdouts/

G7 agrees to avoid higher taxes for US and UK companies

 The United States and the Group of Seven nations have agreed to support a proposal that would exempt U.S. companies from some components of an existing global agreement, the G7 said in a statement on Saturday.

The group has created a "side-by-side" system in response to the U.S. administration agreeing to scrap the Section 899 retaliatory tax proposal from President Donald Trump’s tax and spending bill, it said in a statement from Canada, the head of the rolling G7 presidency.

The G7 said the plan recognizes existing U.S. minimum tax laws and aims to bring more stability to the international tax system.

The U.S Treasury Department said that following the removal of Section 899 from the U.S. Senate version of the tax and spending bill, there is a shared understanding that a side-by-side system could preserve important gains made by jurisdictions inside the Inclusive Framework in tackling base erosion and profit shifting.

"We look forward to discussing and developing this understanding within the Inclusive Framework," the Department said in a post on X on Saturday.

UK businesses are also spared higher taxes after the removal of Section 899 from President Donald Trump’s tax and spending bill.

Britain said businesses would benefit from greater certainty and stability following the agreement. Some British businesses had in recent weeks said they were worried about paying substantial additional tax due to the inclusion of Section 899, which has now been removed.

"Today’s agreement provides much-needed certainty and stability for those businesses after they had raised their concerns," finance minister Rachel Reeves said in a statement, adding that more work was needed to tackle aggressive tax planning and avoidance.

G7 officials said that they look forward to discussing a solution that is "acceptable and implementable to all".

In January, through an executive order, Trump declared that the global corporate minimum tax deal was not applicable in the U.S., effectively pulling out of the landmark 2021 arrangement negotiated by the Biden administration with nearly 140 countries.

He also vowed to impose a retaliatory tax against countries that impose taxes on U.S. firms under the 2021 global tax agreement. This tax was considered detrimental to many foreign companies operating in the U.S.

https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/g7-strikes-deal-to-shield-us-multinationals-from-higher-global-taxes-ft-reports-4115777

Germany's Plans Are Big, But Not Big Enough, KKR's Vincent Policard Says

 The German cabinet has approved plans to spend 500B on infrastructure over the next 12 years, but KKR's (KKR) Vincent Policard says it's not enough. KKR has invested billions in Germany over the past few years, and Policard says private capital will be key.


https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/KKR-CO-INC-44486777/news/Germany-s-Plans-Are-Big-But-Not-Big-Enough-KKR-s-Vincent-Policard-Says-50353433/