Search This Blog

Tuesday, August 19, 2025

Are James Comey's Taylor Swift ravings a new political con, or is he just weird?

 


Are James Comey's sudden babblings about how pop-tart singer Taylor Swift was his guide to life a sign that he knows he's legally up to his neck in alligators? Or is he just a weirdo? Seems both arguments have some truth. ack

In case you haven't seen it, he wrote this sort of thing on his Substack, via GatewayPundit:

Hey, everybody. Welcome back to my Substack. Last week’s cold turns out to have been COVID—quite a flashback. Donald Trump is still President and still humiliating America on a national stage, standing next to Vladimir Putin. It’s like a dream—a bad dream you can’t wake up from. But I don’t want to talk about that bad dream this week. I want to talk about a truly inspirational public figure named Taylor Swift.

Had enough? It gets worse:

Of course, I watched her podcast interview with the Kelsey Brothers. Of course, I watched the whole thing, although on YouTube, Patrice and I got kicked off for the last 15 minutes and finished it on her phone. But I watched it. You see, Taylor Swift and I go way back. I went to my first concert of hers 15 years ago. I’ve been to a second, and I have helped financially support the attendance of a lot of family members at others. I’m in a family Swiftie group chat. I know all her music, and I listen to it on my headphones when I cut the grass. So yes, I have a favorite of hers—although honestly, for me, it’s a tie between All Too Well, 10 Minute Version and Exile featuring Bon Iver.

Taylor Swift has grown up with my family and provided us a soundtrack, really, as we’ve grown ourselves and learned and adapted and dealt with adversity and celebration. She had songs for all of it. I suspect that’s something that millions of Americans have also experienced in their families. I think that’s because Taylor Swift produces great art, but also because she models something.

At every stage of her career, she’s shown a certain way of being that resonated with my kids and also felt right to me as a parent. She’s still doing that as a grown-up. Like a lot of you, I struggle with how to stand up to bullies without letting their meanness infect me and change me. You may have seen that the governor of California has been generating a lot of attention lately by posting on social media in a satirical way where he mocks Donald Trump and his all-caps megalomania and his absurdity. I find it very funny—hilarious even sometimes. But I’ve got to be honest, it also leaves me with a strange feeling at times, because I don’t want us to become like Trump and his followers. There are far more decent, honest, kind people in America than there are mean jerks.

Now, don’t get me wrong—we have our jerks, millions of them, you may have noticed. In particular, there’s a stunning coarseness and ugliness in the Republican Party today. It’s upsetting, but it’s also a minority of America. On the whole, we aren’t like that, and we don’t like that. I think that’s a big part of the reason so few Americans support Donald Trump when they have to see him up close, and why Republicans are so worried about what’s coming for them next year.

And to be clear, I am not an advocate for weakness. Of course, we need to stand up to jerks and defend what matters. But I think we have to try to do that without becoming like them, which is what makes me think about Taylor Swift. She’s made clear that she sees Donald Trump for what he is. And last year, she urged Americans not to make the serious mistake of electing him. Of course, we’re now living with the consequences of that mistake.

 

But while our elderly, makeup-covered President is posting about whether Taylor Swift is still hot and declaring that he can’t stand her, what’s she doing? Living her best life, producing great music, and—as she urged all of us to do during the podcast—not giving the jerks power over her mind.

This guy is someone's dad? I have yet to hear of another dad as buffoonish and immature as this one. Dads can be slobs, dads can be cranky, dads can be car-crazy, dads can leave the toilet seat up form a man-cave and drink beer. But they sure as heck don't babble like teenybopper Barbie dolls about a lightweight pop sensation who likes to sing about her bad choices in men. Just he does. That must have been some household the Comey kids grew up in.

But never mind the gross household. This was America's premier lawman, the director of the FBI. successor to J. Edgar Hoover and the inheritor of a long legacy of successes. This guy ran an agency of 35,000 highly trained agents, the elite of the elite of law enforcement, with offices around the globe, wieldin immense power. 

Colin Powell once said he was a fan of ABBA, so bad taste in music among the swamp set is not uncommon. But Powell never gushed the way Comey does. Powell seemed to understand that the Swedish pop group made music he liked and beyond that, there was no need to comment.

Comey, though, is a different story. This jackass shouldn't have been near law enforcement, any law enforcement, at any time in his disgraceful career.

Yet here he is, at the age of 64, telling us how important Taylor Swift is to his philosophy of life as if we'd really like to know that. 

Maybe he cynically thinks a certain segment of the public would like to know that -- the kind of low-information women who might turn up on his jury now that he's likely to be held to account for his criminal acts against President Trump during his first administration. Thomas Lifson, our founder at AT, made that observation.

But there are some nuances here.

Comey has indeed been obsessed with the pop princess for years and years. In 2018, he babbled to an adoring press at NPR about his love for the pop princess and her canned 'music' as well as other pop-culture dreck:

Instead, he loves the emotional TV drama, “This Is Us,” which he calls his “favorite program,” and said he cries after nearly every episode “like a baby.” “It’s just so good,” he said.

Comey said he also listens to Taylor Swift and Kendrick Lamar, whom his kids like. He also favors Beyonce, recounting to the NewsHour an FBI briefing he once received on a counterintelligence case called “Sandcastles.”

“They always have weird code names,” he said. “It was ‘Sandcastles,’ and so I said ‘Beyonce!’ And I was the only one in the room who had any idea what I was talking about. People were like ‘What?’ I said, ‘We built sandcastles’… Honest to God, I sung like that.”

Now there's a man's man. Ready to vomit?

He always was a weirdo, completely out of touch with reality.

In 2018, Politico's senior media writer, Jack Schafer, had this to say about Comey:

Having used both his book, A Higher Loyalty, and his interview with ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos to portray himself as the defender of truth, the paragon of integrity, the embodiment of ethical values and principles and as someone guided by a steady moral compass, former FBI Director James Comey has drenched the public discourse with the stink of sanctimony. Not to mention his heavy yammering about leadership, the likely topic he’ll be lecturing on at $60,000 a speech on the stemwinding circuit for the next couple of years.

As a former U.S. attorney, deputy attorney general, corporate attorney, hedge-funder and FBI director, you’d imagine that Comey had viewed himself through life’s mirror often enough to realize that overdressing himself in the vestments of truth and honor might backfire. But there he goes in the book and interview, posturing like the deacon of justice he obviously thinks he is.

 One thing that is a pattern though, is his tendency to pop off on foolish topics like these whenever the long arm of the law seems to be looking for him.

In 2018, I found this piece I wrote about his pattern of doing weird stuff, like jumping jacks or wearing an FBI gay pride t-shirt always coinciding with his own legal hot water:

He always posts something weird when he's on the political hot seat and desires to deflect attention. Most of the Twitter responders to that one at the time suggested that since he likes jumping, maybe he ought to get fitted for an orange prison jumpsuit.

... and ...

When he gets weird he posts weird things. And based on what we can tell, it's a coordinate with some detail about his being in political trouble. In the end, he always winds up looking just strange.

That might be what's going on here. He's weird enough as it is. But when legal trouble beckons for him, he likes to put his weirdness out there for all to 'admire.'

That's some bizarre ego, making himself a clown and laughingstock as lawmen breathe down his neck as they are now with his role in the Hillary Clinton email scandal, the failure to prosecute the Clinton Foundation for its pay-to-play scandal, the Russia collusion conniving, the leaks to the press and other bad behavior. He must be letting it all hang out now that the heat is on. What a strange specimen.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/08/are_comey_s_taylor_swift_ravings_a_new_political_con_or_is_he_just_weird.html

'Mamdani holds private meeting with NY Archbishop Dolan to discuss ‘broad range of issues’'

 Socialist Zohran Mamdani met privately with New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan Tuesday to discuss a “broad range of issues” in the Big Apple mayoral race, The Post has learned.

The Democratic mayoral nominee requested the sitdown with Dolan, a leading figure in the Catholic Church, both in New York and nationally, and the two chatted at the cardinal’s residence, sources said.

“It was a private meeting that Mr. Mamdani requested and they discussed a broad range of issues,” said Joe Zwilling, a spokesman for the cardinal and the Archdiocese of New York.

Zohran Mamdani speaking at a microphone.
Socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani held a private meeting with NY Archbishop Timothy Dolan on Tuesday.William C Lopez/New York Post

Mamdani spokesperson Dora Pekec said,  “Zohran was deeply honored to meet with the Cardinal and their discussion was both warm and productive.” 

The Archdiocese’s Catholic Services provides an array of assistance to needy youths, the homeless, people with disabilities and migrants and refugees.

Mamdani, who is Muslim, also is seeking to broaden his outreach and support since winning the Democratic primary in June.

Cardinal speaking at a microphone.
The Archbishop plays a pivotal role in the assistance of needy youths, the homeless, people with disabilities and migrants and refugees.AFP via Getty Images

The Democratic socialist has met several times with the Rev. Al Sharpton, a civil rights activist who heads the National Action Network, as well as other black pastors.

Mamdani, now considered the front-runner to become the next mayor, has been speaking at black churches while on the campaign trail.

He also has reached out to Latino pastors.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/19/us-news/zohran-mamdani-holds-private-meeting-with-archbishop-dolan-to-discuss-broad-range-of-issue-in-nyc-mayoral-race/

Europe is not prepared to take up the defense of Ukraine

 There are many more ways in which a peace process can fail than succeed.

But for either to happen, it first needs to start.

And that is often the most difficult step.

But after his big summit in the White House, Donald Trump seems to have pulled off the unthinkable: A summit has been organized between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky which would kick-start peace negotiations.

What did it take to get here?

While a cease-fire will not be a precondition, the Europeans have been granted some of the assurances they wanted on security guarantees.

Whether these can be enforced is an entirely different matter — but America’s agreement, in principle, to help the Europeans meet their obligations does mark an important shift in this seemingly endless war.

Since it is now unlikely that Trump will change his mind and revert to the Biden-era policy of unconditional, if hesitant, support for Ukraine, we are now left with two possible scenarios for how the war plays out.

In the first, Ukraine and Russia will agree to a peace deal, and the US and Europe will try their best to make the post-war security arrangement work.

It is our baseline scenario, but it will be hard to pull off since the question of land is a particularly difficult one.

President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the end of a joint press conference at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on August 15, 2025.AFP via Getty Images

The starting point of the talks would have to be the existing military situation — not Russia’s or Ukraine’s maximal demands — and would then need to be followed by detailed negotiations.

In the second scenario, the peace talks will go ahead but fail.

Trump will then blame Zelensky and actively disengage from supporting Ukraine.

Beware of extrapolating yesterday’s show of support: The smiles are deceptive.

Trump wants to get out.

Like the real estate developer he once was, who has first put a deposit down, Trump has invested political capital into a peace process and he is not going to back down.

Russian President Vladimir Putin listens to acting Head of the Komi Republic Rostislav Goldshtein during a meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2025.AP

This scenario would be very bad for Ukraine and for Europe.

America would withdraw — for real this time.

The Europeans would be left having to support Ukraine and build a new security infrastructure without US support.

This is not really a viable financial or military option for European leaders.

After all, their engagement would have to be major.

The Ukraine-Russia front line is, at the moment, about 745 miles — around the length of the Cold War-era inner German border.

Nor does this include the rest of Ukraine’s de jure border to the north and east with Russia, and with Belarus.

There have been some comparisons with the situation in Korea — but the demilitarized zone there is barely 155 miles in length.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky speaks during a joint press conference with the European Commission President in Brussels, on August 17, 2025.AFP via Getty Images

Adequately securing such a large border on the Ukrainian side would take a huge amount of troops — one estimate suggests as many as 150,000 European soldiers.

This is a far larger deployment than anyone has envisaged; Emmanuel Macron mentioned troop numbers in the thousands earlier in the year similar to the so-called trip-wire deployments in the Baltic States.

And even if they wanted to, European leaders don’t have the troops needed to provide genuine assurances to Kyiv.

Johann Wadephul, the German foreign minister, recently admitted that Germany probably wouldn’t have the capacity to send troops to Ukraine.

And while the UK might be keen to voice its political commitment to the country, it’s doubtful that it can meaningfully back this up.

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 18, 2025.AFP via Getty Images

A RUSI piece last year indicated that Britain does not have enough equipment to sustain a proper three-brigade armored division.

Even deploying a single brigade would use up 70%-80% of the British Army’s total combat engineering capabilities.

There are other challenges too.

At this stage, the easiest way to blow a deal, by either side, would be to refuse concessions on land.

The Russian claim for the entirety of the Donbas region, including the parts they don’t occupy, is a maximalist one, from which Russia would have to retreat if the negotiations were to succeed.

There are some commercial assets in the region of interest to Moscow — mines and industrial companies based in the Russian-occupied parts — but it has military significance for Ukraine.

In any case, there is a long history of European regions being split.

Karelia split into Finnish and Russian parts after the Winter War of 1939-40, and parts of the old Prussia are now in Lithuania, Russia, Poland and Germany.

Negotiations, though, will be fraught.

But the big difficulty European leaders will face is how to deal with their war-crazed supporters back home.

There has been a great deal of cheerleading and regime-change fanaticism in the European political and media space, with many recent headlines insisting that Russia must not be rewarded for its aggression.

None of these authors, of course, has a military strategy for victory, because strategic thinking is not what educated Europeans do.

They use the passive tense when they speak or write: Something must be done, they intone.

Rarely, if ever, do they say: “We will do this and are ready to make sacrifices to do so.”

But we do know the rest of the world does not look at Russia the way Europe does.

This Eurocentric perspective no longer dominates global discourse — except, of course, in Europe.

It is clear that we are living in one of those dangerous moments in history where fate could flip either way.

Yet for all his arrogance, at least Trump has a strategy, whereas; the Europeans do not.

Wolfgang Münchau is director of news service Eurointelligence and a columnist for the New Statesman.

https://nypost.com/2025/08/19/opinion/europe-is-not-prepared-to-take-up-the-defense-of-ukraine/

Trump eyes US government stakes in other chip makers that received CHIPS Act funds, sources say

 U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that receive CHIPS Act funding to build factories in the country, two sources said.

Expanding on a plan to receive an equity stake in Intel in exchange for cash grants, a White House official and a person familiar with the situation said Lutnick is exploring how the U.S. can receive equity stakes in exchange for CHIPS Act funding for companies such as Micron, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Samsung. Much of the funding has not yet been dispersed.

Aside from Intel, memory chipmaker Micron is the biggest U.S. recipient of CHIPS Act cash. TSMC declined comment. Micron, Samsung and the White House did not respond to requests for comment.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday that Lutnick was working on a deal with Intel to take a 10% government stake. "The president wants to put America's needs first, both from a national security and economic perspective, and it's a creative idea that has never been done before," she told reporters.

While Lutnick said earlier on CNBC that the U.S. does not want to tell Intel how to run its operations, any investment would be unprecedented and ramps up a new era of U.S. influence on the big companies. In the past, the U.S. has taken stakes in companies to provide cash and build confidence in times of economic upheaval and uncertainty.

In a similar move earlier this year, Trump approved Nippon Steel's purchase of U.S. Steel after being promised a "golden share" that would prevent the companies from reducing or delaying promised investments, transferring production or jobs outside the U.S., or closing or idling plants before certain time frames, without the president's consent.

The two sources said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is also involved in the CHIPS Act discussions, but that Lutnick is driving the process. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act. The act provides funding for research and grants for building chip plants in the U.S.

Lutnick has been pushing the equity idea, the sources said, adding that Trump likes the idea.

The U.S. Commerce Department late last year finalized subsidies of $4.75 billion for Samsung, $6.2 billion for Micron and $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the U.S.

In June, Lutnick said the department was re-negotiating some of former President Joe Biden's grants to semiconductor firms, calling them "overly generous". He noted at the time that Micron offered to increase its spending on chip plants in the U.S.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-eyes-us-government-stakes-222031411.html