Search This Blog

Monday, December 1, 2025

Before braces: Palate expanders??

 The 8-year-old daughter of “The Real Housewives of New Jersey” star Danielle Cabral has been rocking a bougie new accessory — and no, it’s not bursting with bows, tulle or sequins.

You can’t tell by looking at her, but Valentina Cabral sports a pricey metal appliance that sits inside her mouth and gives her teeth room to shine.

“Her teeth are actually aligned perfectly right now,” Cabral, 40, told The Post. “I definitely have seen a change.”

“The Real Housewives of New Jersey” star Danielle Cabral and her 8-year-old daughter, Valentina, show off her palate expander at a KidZdent office.Michael McWeeney

Forget Labubus“Wicked” dolls and merch from “KPop Demon Hunters.” The latest must-have among Gen Alpha pre-tweens is a $3,000 palate expander that gradually widens the upper jaw to create more space for crowded permanent teeth and correct bite issues.

Parents have been raving about these glow-up gadgets, even though they resemble scaffolding, the upkeep can be stressful, and they may make eating and talking difficult.

“It’s not as bad as you think,” Cabral said, “and it’s really [a] millisecond of time in their whole life.”

Why does the palate need expanding?

The palate is the roof of your mouth, which separates your nasal and oral cavities and plays a crucial role in your breathing, speaking and chewing.

Many people have a narrow palate like Valentina, with one study of orthodontic care finding it in 80% of participants.

Valentina got a removable palate expander in July after her speech suffered with the traditional device.Michael McWeeney

The palate may not develop properly due to genetics, aggressive thumb-sucking or chronic nasal obstruction, resulting in crowded teeth, speech issues and breathing difficulties.

Since the palate is made of two parts, the palate expander works by slowly pulling both halves apart.

“Palatal expanders are most effective when the jaw is still growing, typically between the ages of 7 and 14,” Dr. Barry Glaser, an orthodontist in Westchester County, told The Post.

“Teens and adults may also be candidates for treatment, but results are best in younger patients.”

You don’t need to tell that to Starla Arguijo, 36, who got her latest palate expander in June.

“I wish I would have gotten it done when I was much younger, because I’ve spent my entire life hating my smile,” the Texas mom confessed to The Post.

How do palate expanders work?

Traditional palate expanders attach to the upper back molars with bands. A small screw mechanism connects the two halves of the metal device.

The kid or parent is given a special key to slightly turn the screw each day, with each twist widening the appliance by about 0.25 millimeters.

Valentina demonstrates how to turn the device to widen it, which can be the trickiest part for some kids.Michael McWeeney

“I’m right there with her doing it, but [Valentina] wants to be independent and do it herself now, which gives me anxiety,” Cabral admitted about the turns.

“Sometimes she rotates it the wrong way.”

As the palate widens, new bone tissue forms in the gap to stabilize the expansion.

Palate expanders can be worn for several months, depending on the narrowness of the arch.

After all the turns are made, there’s usually a holding phase to let things settle. Patients might notice better teeth alignment, a wider smile and face shape and even improved breathing and sleep because the nasal passages expanded too.

Connecticut mom Jessica Ziolko said her 8-year-old daughter’s teeth are already less crowded since she got her palate expander in October.

“I took photos before she got the palate expander, and then we took some recently and compared them side by side, and we’ve definitely seen a shift in her teeth,” Ziolko told The Post about her daughter Scarlett, who has a “really high” palate and an open bite — her upper and lower front teeth don’t touch, even when she closes her mouth.

How much does a palate expander cost?

The price varies based on the type of expander, the complexity of the case and insurance coverage.

Ziolko, for one, shelled out $4,500 for Scarlett’s expander and braces.

In Pennsylvania, Sencak Orthodontics reports that the initial orthodontic consultation costs between $100 and $250, while the device is priced $1,000 to $3,000. Follow-up visits for adjustments and monitoring range from $50 to $150 a pop.

An alternative — the Invisalign Palatal Expander, which launched in 2023 — can cost anywhere from $1,000 to over $6,000.

It differs from the traditional appliances in that it is removable and does not feature screws or metal parts.

“The Invisalign system uses a series of 3D-printed expanders,” explained Glaser, an Invisalign provider.

“Patients brush and floss, clean the device and insert it onto the posterior teeth,” he added. “The trays are swapped according to the treatment plan, with no manual turning required.”

What are some downsides of palate expanders?

Experts say that side effects of the expanders can include discomfort, pain, jaw aches and headaches, as well as speech difficulties, sinus pressure, a gap between front teeth and increased saliva.

Arguijo has struggled as the wires press down on her tongue — and she lamented that she sounds like she’s “sick half the time.”

And over in New Jersey, Valentina replaced the traditional expander she got in September 2024 with a removable one in July after “choking” on some words.

“My daughter is an actress, so it really affected her speech in the beginning, and even when she [learned] how to use it, there was a difference in her speech,” Cabral explained.

“She had some big roles that she was up for,” she added, “and [the dentist] said, ‘We can do the removable one.'”

Palate expanders often enhance the braces experience instead of substituting for them.Michael McWeeney

It also changes eating habits, since hard, sticky, chewy and sugary foods can damage the device.

Lottie Weaver’s 9-year-old daughter, Kinlee, said goodbye to Starbursts, suckers and gum when she got her expander in May.

“Things get stuck in it,” the Arizona mom told The Post as she recalled the “hard” adjustment. “The first week, she literally just ate rice and yogurt … and it was sore.”

Do palate expanders replace braces?

Dr. Ben Winters, a Texas-based dentist and orthodontist, said palate expanders are “about as permanent as a jaw surgery would be.”

Yet, they rarely fix smiles on their own.

“Almost universally, people will still undergo braces — if they already have a narrow jaw, there’s probably other things going on: crowding, underbite, overbite, etc.,” Winters, founder of the oral care company Something Nice, told The Post.

“It would be rare to only do an expander and that’s it, but in some mild cases where it perfectly relieves the crowding, I guess it’s a possibility!”

Tips for those considering palate expanders

  • Speak up if there’s discomfort. Arguijo said she changed expanders after “the roof of my mouth kept growing over” the first one. You may have to experiment to find the right one.
  • Do the prescribed turns. A big problem that experts see is patients doing more turns than needed, causing overexpansion, pain or tissue damage. The good news is that a professional can undo the turns.
  • Keep it clean. Weaver recommends a water flosser to spray away the gunk. She also packs a disposable toothbrush and a collapsible cup in her daughter’s backpack in case something gets caught in the expander at school.
  • Educate yourself on the possibilities. Ziolko said her daughter not only needs the expander and braces, but also myofunctional therapy to help correct her mouth breathing and her tongue posture. She figured this out after doing extensive research on orthodontic treatments.

Minn. social service workers slam Walz as ‘100% responsible for massive fraud’ of $1B roiling state

 Hundreds of state workers at the Minnesota Department of Human Services publicly excoriated Gov. Tim Walz for allowing a “massive fraud” scandal to unfold under his watch and retaliating against their whistleblowers.

Over $1 billion in taxpayers’ money was fleeced by dozens of scammers in Minnesota’s Feeding Our Future fraud scandal, the largest known COVID-19 fraud case in the country.

“Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota. We let Tim Walz know of fraud early on, hoping for a partnership in stopping fraud but no, we got the opposite response,” the Minnesota DHS employees’ X account, which represents over 480 staffers, chided Saturday.

“Tim Walz systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports. Instead of partnership, we got the full weight of retaliation,” the account charged.

“It’s scary, isolating and left us wondering who we can turn to.”

Just last week, the Justice Department prosecuted the 78th defendant in what prosecutors have dubbed the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme. At least 59 people have been convicted so far.

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz downplayed the fraud scandal and ripped into President Trump for seizing on it.AP
Feeding Our Future dissolved in 2022 as it faced scrutiny from prosecutors and federal investigators.AP

During the past five years, fraudsters targeted Minnesota’s generous social safety net by setting up companies that billed the state for social services that prosecutors alleged were never actually provided.

Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit founded in 2016 that purported to help feed school children, had partnered with dozens of local businesses under the pretense of providing food aid.

The nonprofit, which dissolved in 2022, and its partners billed the state, claiming to have helped feed tens of thousands of needy children. In reality, most of that money was squandered on foreign real estate projects, luxury cars, and more.

Other organizations besides Feeding Our Future committed fraud with Minnesota’s social safety net as well.

The fraud largely revolved around dozens of people in the Somali diaspora. Minnesota is home to about 80,000 Somali Americans.

“As staff, we firsthand witnessed and observed fraud happening yet we were shutdown, reassigned and told to keep quiet,” the Minnesota DHS employees’ X account alleged.

Investigators have conducted multiple raids in the Feeding Our Future fraud scandal.Star Tribune via Getty Images

“Sometimes more. Leadership did not want to appear to discriminate against certain communities and were unwilling to take action, such as stopping fraud, that would have an adverse impact on their image.”

Federal prosecutors began charging individuals associated with Feeding Our Future in 2022. As federal investigators parsed through documents, they quickly realized that the fraud was widespread.

One homelessness program started as $2.6 million in 2021 saw its costs soar to $104 million last year, after being rife with fraud, the New York Times reported.

“Minnesota has become the land of 10,000 frauds under Tim Walz,” House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) told The Post about the scandal.

“This is a total slap in the face to the hardworking, law-abiding people of Minnesota. The Walz administration is either too incompetent or completely unwilling to clean up their own mess.”

Hundreds of workers in the Minnesota Department of Human Services gave a stern rebuke to Gov. Tim Walz.X/Minnesota_DHS

The egregious scandal also drew attention from President Trump, who ripped Minnesota as “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.”

Walz returned fire against Trump and noted that “I take responsibility for putting people in jail,” despite federal prosecutors leading many of the charges.

“Donald Trump: Deflect, demonize, come up with no solutions. He’s not going to help fix anything on fraud,” Walz told NBC News’ “Meet the Press” in an interview that aired Sunday. “My God, there’s a big difference between fraud and corruption. And corruption is something he knows about.”

The Minnesota DHS employees’ X account also accused Walz of weakening safeguards and disempowering the Office of the Legislative Auditor during the alarming fraud.

“This is a cascade of systemic failures leading up to Tim Walz,” the workers alleged. “Agency leaders appointed by Tim Walz willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet — even to the extent of threatening families of whistleblowers.”

“We can’t fight fraud in Minnesota alone, hence why we’re appealing to the federal levels of government. We need all the help we can get.”

The Post reached out to Walz’s office for comment.

Walz launched his campaign for a third term as governor of Minnesota in September.

Minnesota is one of over a dozen states that don’t have term limits on its governor. But no Minnesota governor has been elected three times since gubernatorial terms were extended from two to four years in 1963.

https://nypost.com/2025/12/01/us-news/minn-social-service-workers-slam-gov-tim-walz-as-100-responsible-for-1b-state-fraud/

Russia warns NATO about preemptive strikes

 The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement on Monday regarding NATO's comments about possible "preemptive strikes" against Russia. The ministry said the remarks are an "extremely irresponsible step, demonstrating the alliance's readiness to continue escalating." It warned NATO that it should be "aware of the ensuing risks and potential consequences, including for the alliance members themselves."

NATO Military Committee Chair Giuseppe Cavo Dragone said in an interview with the Financial Times on Sunday that the alliance is considering "more aggressive" actions against Russia's hybrid warfare. He said deterrence, including retaliation and preemptive strikes, should be analyzed "deeply" if NATO comes under more pressure from Russia. However, he noted that such strikes are "further away from our normal way of thinking and behavior" and that legal and jurisdictional frameworks must be taken into account.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Russia-warns-NATO-about-preemptive-strikes/65273182

Burry says Tesla is 'ridiculously overvalued'

 Short seller Michael Burry just took a swipe at another richly valued stock: Tesla (TSLA).

Burry, who rose to fame shorting the housing market during the 2008 financial crisis, dubbed the EV maker as "ridiculously overvalued" in a Substack post on Sunday. Business Insider was first to report on Burry's latest missive.

His post took aim at the "tragic algebra" of stock-based compensation, and Tesla was an example. Tesla dilutes its stock by 3.6% a year, he said, and offers no buybacks.

"Tesla's market capitalization is ridiculously overvalued today and has been for a good long time," Burry said, adding that CEO Elon Musk's $1 trillion dollar pay package will dilute Tesla stock even further. Last month, Tesla shareholders approved the controversial pay package at its shareholder meeting.

Burry added another dig at Tesla's various pivots as the automaker pushed deeper into other areas of tech.

"As an aside, the Elon cult was all-in on electric cars until competition showed up, then all-in on autonomous driving until competition showed up, and now is all-in on robots — until competition shows up," Burry wrote in parentheses.

Burry did not disclose any position in Tesla stock.

Last month, the short seller took a sizable short position in both Nvidia (NVDA) and Palantir (PLTR) stock via put options, which investors typically buy if they are betting on a stock to fall.

Burry also subsequently deregistered his hedge fund, Scion Capital, and took to Substack to post his views.

Noted short seller Jim Chanos told Yahoo Finance's Laura Bratton that he also had concerns about Nvidia's use of vendor financing to boost sales, which Burry complained about as well.

Both Chanos and Burry have held Tesla short positions at points in the past.

Musk has in the past slammed short sellers of Tesla stock, most recently warning Bill Gates to close out his short position "soon."

While Burry warns about Tesla's valuation, Wall Street has become increasingly bullish.

Last week, Melius Research tabbed the EV maker a "must own" due to its autonomy efforts and as CEO Elon Musk talked up its chipmaking progress, which followed Stifel the week before upping its price target and reiterating Tesla's Buy rating, citing Tesla's strength in full self-driving (FSD) and its robotaxi service.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/michael-burry-says-tesla-is-ridiculously-overvalued-slams-musk-pay-package-150113993.html

US announces zero tariff pharmaceutical deal with Britain



The UK and the US have agreed a deal to keep tariffs on UK pharmaceutical shipments into America at zero.


Under the agreement the UK will pay more for medicines through the NHS in return for a guarantee that US import taxes on pharmaceuticals made in the UK will remain at zero for three years.

The deal comes after US President Donald Trump threatened to raise tariffs to as high as 100% on branded drug imports.

Pharmaceuticals are one of the UK's biggest exports to the US, which is also the biggest market by far for big UK drugmakers including GSK and AstraZeneca.

Earlier this year, US president Donald Trump announced massive increases to taxes on goods imported to the country, which he argued would create jobs and boost American manufacturing.


The White House exempted pharmaceuticals from that round of tariffs, and later signed a deal with the UK to remove some trade barriers between the countries and reduce levies on most goods exported to the US to 10%. But pharmaceuticals remained a big unknown.

The White House has repeatedly threatened to raise tariffs on medicines, citing concerns about the country's reliance on medicines made overseas.

Trump has also argued that US consumers effectively subsidise medicines for other developed countries by paying premium prices for those drugs, pushing for other countries to pay more.

White House spokesman Kush Desai said the agreement with the UK was a "historic step towards ensuring that other developed countries finally pay their fair share".

Under the terms set out on Monday, the UK will increase the price threshold at which it deems new treatments to be too expensive by 25%.

The UK will also increase the overall amount the NHS spends on medicines, with a target to increase that spending from 0.3% of GDP to 0.6% of GDP over the next 10 years.

The amount drug companies must pay back to the NHS to ensure the health system does not overspend its allocated budget will be capped at 15% - last year, drug companies had to pay back more than 20%.

In exchange, UK medicine exports will be protected from tariff increases for the next three years.

Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle said the deal "guarantees that UK pharmaceutical exports – worth at least £5bn a year - will enter the US tariff free, protecting jobs, boosting investment and paving the way for the UK to become a global hub for life sciences."


In the 12 months to the end of September, the UK exported £11.1bn worth of medicines to the US, making up 17.4% of all goods exports in that period, according to the Department for Business and Trade.

The pressure from the US had intensified a long-running row between the industry and UK government over spending levels and approval rates.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting said in August that he was not prepared to let drug companies "rip off" the UK, after talks between the government and pharmaceutical firms over the cost of medicines broke down.

But subsequently Science Minister Sir Patrick Vallance told the BBC he accepted that the NHS needed to spend more on medicines after seeing its spending on drugs shrink as a percentage of its budget over the last 10 years.

Meanwhile, several large pharma investments in the UK have been paused or cancelled over the last 18 months while both GSK and AstraZeneca have recently announced multi-billion-dollar investments in the US.

In mid-September, British pharmaceutical giant GSK pledged to invest $30bn (£22bn) in research and manufacturing in the US over the next five years.

A week before GSK's US investment announcement, US pharmaceutical company Merck - which is called MSD in Europe – revealed it was scrapping its planned £1bn expansion of its UK operations.

Shortly after, AstraZeneca also announced it was pausing a planned £200m investment in a Cambridge research facility. In July, AstraZeneca said it would invest $50bn on medicine manufacturing and research and development in the US.

William Bain, head of trade policy at the British Chambers of Commerce, said he was pleased to see that the protections from US tariffs that UK officials had promised earlier this year had been delivered.

"This deal is a real win. It will promote exports, boost investment, and enhance UK competitiveness as a production and innovation base for world-leading medicines and treatments," he said.


The White House had launched a formal investigation into pharmaceutical imports and their effect on national security in April, taking the first step towards tariffs.

In September in a Truth Social post, Trump threatened to raise tariffs on branded drugs - a small subset of the medicine that the US imports - to 100%, but the White House did not put the plan into effect, citing negotiations with manufacturers.

In announcing the new agreement, the UK government said it was the only country in the world to have secured a zero percent tariff rate for pharmaceutical shipments.

European officials have previously said they believed their exports would be protected by terms agreed over the summer, which would cap tariffs at 15%.

US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr said Americans "should not pay the world's highest drug costs for medicines they helped fund".

"This agreement with the United Kingdom strengthens the global environment for innovative medicines and brings long-overdue balance to U.S.–U.K. pharmaceutical trade," he said in a statement.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn0k520v4xro