Search This Blog

Saturday, July 4, 2026

Six California Cities Ranked Among Top 10 Least Educated In US

 Six California cities ranked among the top 10 least educated metropolitan areas in the United States, according to a report by WalletHub published on June 29.

Looking at the 150 most populated metro areas, the city of Visalia ranked as the second least educated, while Bakersfield was fourth, and Modesto, Fresno, Stockton, and Salinas followed.

All six are in central California.

The other four metros that rounded out the top ten were all in Texas - McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Brownsville-Harlingen, Beaumont-Port Arthur, and El Paso, at first, third, ninth, and tenth least educated, respectively.

“Higher education doesn’t guarantee better financial opportunities in the future, but it certainly correlates with it,” WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo said in the report.

“The most educated cities provide good learning opportunities from childhood all the way through the graduate level.”

As Dylan Morgan reports for The Epoch Times, to determine the ranking, WalletHub equally factored in the share of adults at least 25 years old who have a high school diploma or higher, who have at least some college experience, who have a bachelor’s degree or higher, and who have a graduate or professional degree.

Visalia ranked last among the 150 metros in percent of bachelor’s degree holders and percent of graduate or professional degree holders.

It ranked 107th highest in median annual household income, and there appeared to be a general correlation between income and education rates across the nation.

However, Visalia still had a lower poverty rate than the state average—11.3 percent compared to 11.8 percent, according to U.S. Census data—and Stockton ranked as having the 31st highest median household income while Salinas ranked as 26th highest, though those two cities were near the bottom in education.

Education and income rate correlations may not reflect California’s higher cost of living and regional economic structures, such as the Central Valley’s reliance on agriculture, an industry that has not historically required higher education the same way other California hubs have, such as Silicon Valley.

The San Jose metro, home to Silicon Valley, ranked as the fourth most educated in the United States.

WalletHub said that more than 55 percent of the San Jose metro’s population over the age of 25 have at least a bachelor’s degree, while nearly 28 percent have an advanced degree. .

It also ranked third for university quality. San Jose is near Stanford University and has Santa Clara University and San Jose State University in the center of the metro.

The nearby San Francisco metro area, which is home to the University of California—Berkeley, ranked as the eighth most educated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/six-california-cities-ranked-among-top-10-least-educated-us

World's Top Destinations For Wealth Migration

 Countries are increasingly competing to attract wealthy individuals alongside businesses and skilled workers. For many governments, internationally mobile wealth represents a source of investment, entrepreneurship, and long-term economic growth.

This graphic, via Visual Cspitalist's Dorothy Neufeld, ranks the world’s most competitive destinations for wealth migration using data from The Henley Private Wealth Migration Report 2026, which evaluates countries across 12 factors including tax policy, investor pathways, regulatory quality, and overall business environment.

The Most Competitive Countries for Wealth Migration

Below, countries are measured by their competitiveness for attracting internationally mobile wealth.

Singapore leads globally, ahead of New Zealand and the Cayman Islands. Europe also performs strongly, with the Netherlands, Cyprus, Portugal, Italy, Switzerland, and Greece all appearing in the top 15.

Singapore’s position reflects its combination of low taxes, political stability, and business-friendly policies. Together, these strengths have made it one of the safest countries for investors, and a magnet for wealth across Asia.

Small Countries Stand Out

One of the clearest patterns is the strength of smaller economies. Overall, 11 of the 16 most competitive countries have populations under 10 million.

Many of these countries have spent decades building investor-friendly ecosystems. Singapore offers a globally connected financial hub, Cyprus provides attractive residency pathways, and Switzerland combines political stability with an established private banking industry.

Rather than relying on domestic market size, many of these countries compete by offering predictable regulation, efficient tax systems, strong legal institutions, and straightforward pathways for investors to establish residency or relocate wealth.

The U.S. Falls Behind

Despite having the world’s largest economy, the U.S. faces several structural challenges in attracting wealth.

Citizenship-based taxation, fiscal complexity, longer investor processing times, and political polarization are among the factors weighing on its score. By contrast, many higher-ranked countries offer simpler tax regimes, making them more attractive to internationally mobile wealth.

Unlike most countries, the U.S. taxes its citizens on worldwide income regardless of where they live, a feature that can increase tax burdens for internationally mobile individuals.

Why Countries Are Competing for Wealth

Countries are increasingly competing for more than businesses and skilled workers. They are also competing for private capital.

In 2025 alone, nearly 1 million people globally became millionaires, highlighting the growing pool of internationally mobile wealth.

High-net-worth individuals often relocate with businesses, investment capital, and philanthropic spending. As global wealth continues to grow, attracting even a relatively small number of affluent residents can have an outsized economic impact, particularly for smaller countries.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/these-are-worlds-top-destinations-wealth-migration

Our kids need MAHA

 Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. is working to MAHA—Make America Healthy Again. It’s a necessary and noble endeavor as Americans are not only suffering from chronic illnesses but also from obesity. It starts in youth.

I’m reminded of that whenever I take a ride. My wife and I used to be runners. Trail runs, marathons, all manner of shorter races, we did them all, and parts eventually wore out. We both have titanium knees. These days we ride recumbents. 

Graphic: TerraTrike GTS. Author.

Trikes when we ride together, and I ride my 20-year-old Lightning Phantom when I ride alone. Recumbents because of a police work neck injury, which doesn’t let me ride upright road bikes anymore. Recumbents relieve the stress on all those damaged neck discs and are as comfortable as conventional bikes are not.

Graphic: Lightning Phantom. Author.

I’m reminded because all those kids and adults on electric scooters, skateboards and bikes take me back.

No, we didn’t have electric versions of those things when I was a kid in the 1400s. Until we were old enough to get a learner’s permit, if we wanted to go somewhere, we walked, ran, or rode our bikes. Without really knowing it, we exercised. We largely thought we were just having fun, but we built strong bodies. We took the President’s Physical Fitness Test annually, and if we passed, we got a cool patch.

Way back when, running was something one did only in sports, and only in the off-season if one was a serious track-and-field athlete. I was, and I ran and rode countless miles, particularly during the summer.

Now, an official old guy, I ride for aerobic exercise. I can run, but my knees made that impossible years ago, and I want to try to keep my new knees fully functional for the rest of my life. Besides, riding, if you do it right and long enough, is fun, which brings me back to contemporary kids.

I’m seeing fewer of them on electric bikes and more on electric scooters, a few on electric skateboards, and more on electric mini-motorcycles with no pedals. I suppose they’d get some exercise when their batteries run dry, and they must push those weight stacks on two wheels home, but otherwise? And many of those kids don’t have that lean and hungry look so many of us had way back when.

We were a hardy lot. Schools wouldn’t close during blizzards until visibility was less than a block or so in town, so we’d bundle up and trudge and crawl over massive snow drifts to get to school. We’d climb ropes to the top of the gym and cavort on playground gear that would send safety Nazis into strokes today. We dodged metal lawn darts, rode in the backs of pickup trucks, got scrapes, bruises, stitches, and broken bones, and loved it all.

Today, parents buy kids electric bikes, which have apparently taken the place of exercise. Sure, I see some kids on real bikes, probably because their parents don’t want to spend the money on electrics, which can be pricey. Or perhaps because they are also worried about sedentary kids and the future.

Adults aren’t much different. My favorite recumbent shop, actually the only really competent one within reasonable driving distance, Angletech in Colorado Springs, tells me most of their trike sales are electric from the factory or as aftermarket add-ons. Electric drives add at least $2000 to the cost of a trike or two-wheeled recumbent.

Most trike riders are adults because recumbents must be adjusted for leg length by lengthening or shortening the boom, which also requires lengthening or shortening the chain. It’s not like raising or lowering a seat on a standard bike, and manufacturers don’t make trikes sized for children. They’re relatively expensive, and there’s little market for them because parents don’t want to buy a new machine every year or two.

At least those adults are getting out there and getting some exercise, but my wife and I need more. We don’t want to be those old folks who strain every muscle just getting out of a chair. 

Of course, some people might need an electric aid if they’re going to ride at all. But what’s the excuse for kids, or their parents? They get their kids electric bikes because, at nine or ten, they’re already world-class athletes and don’t need the exercise?

Maybe it gets them out of the house and off the video games. There’s something to be said for that. 

But maybe, just maybe, we need to think a little farther down the line, where the exercise you got when you were younger continues as you age, determines how long you live, and what sort of life you have as you get there.

Mike McDaniel is a USAF veteran, classically trained musician, Japanese and European fencer, lifelong athlete, firearm instructor, retired police officer, and high school and college English teacher. He is a published author and blogger. His home blog is Stately McDaniel Manor. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/07/our-kids-need-maha/

America used to handle mass immigration using patriotic education

by Andrea Widburg 

From 1901 to 1910, legal immigration to the United States was so great—about 8.8 million people, almost all of whom were Eastern or Southern Europeans—that this influx equaled roughly 10.4% of the American population. Ironically, it was the Progressives of that era, the ones who gave birth to the idea of eugenics that so inspired Hitler, who were deeply worried about the tainting of America’s fine Anglo-Saxon bloodline.

Still, in a pre-computer age with a continuously expanding nation, America needed bodies for farms and factories, and so these immigrants were processed, at Ellis Island on the East Coast and Angel Island on the West Coast, for contagious diseases and anti-American ideas. If they passed, they were in.

The question, then, was how to assimilate all these new people. Today, of course, “assimilation” is a dirty word because, to the anti-assimilationists, America is a bad and dirty country. Sadly, because leftists slowly but steadily conquered America’s education system, from K through graduate school, anti-American ideas control education.

However, the opposite was true during the big immigration push more than a century ago. Assimilation was the name of the game, with the goal of turning new immigrants into people who loved the country that gave them freedom and at least the hope of leaving behind the grinding poverty of their old countries.

Americans weren’t stupid, and they knew, as Lenin knew, that the best thing to do is to catch ‘em while they're young. To that end, America’s education bent its will to teaching all children, whether born here or immigrants, about America’s values and why America was a special and precious place.

An easy way to see this in action is to review school “readers” from that era. Readers were targeted at grade levels from just-learning-how-to-read to high school and were primarily intended to improve students’ reading, writing, and (especially) elocution skills.

However, at every level, the essays chosen weren’t there solely for their literary quality. Instead, they were intended to give American children a shared moral, civic, literary, and historical canon that bound them together in values and patriotism. Importantly, they were not the sole lessons in history and civics. They were adjuncts. If students were going to memorize and recite essays, they should simultaneously have reinforced their higher moral and civic values.

Here’s just a sampling of what you might find in an old child’s reader, beginning in the 1880s, when mass immigration really began, through 1920, when it was slowing, and schools had the tail end of the great bulk of new immigrants. Try to imagine any of this being taught in today’s classrooms, whether public or private, or from kindergarten to graduate school.

While early readers were concerned with chickadees, bunnies, and helping mommy (kind of like the Dick and Jane books I still learned with), the readers for older children, especially in the later years, focused intensely on American history and values. This was open assimilation and universes away from modern education.

(Note: A reader’s number—“First” “Fourth,” etc.—doesn’t correspond to modern grade levels. Instead, the readers spanned roughly two-to-four-year periods: Primer and First were for K-1, Second was 2-3, Third was 4-5, and Sixth covered a four-year high school.)

Immigrant children in New York City saluting the flag, circa 1890.

Cyr’s Fourth Reader (© 1898, 1899)

In addition to passages from famed writers such as Nathaniel Hawthorne, Charles Dickens, Alfred Tennyson, George Eliot, Thackeray (writing about Pocahontas), etc., the reader has A Welcome to Lafayette, The National Flag (ours, of course), Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, and Washington’s Address to His Troops.

McGuffey’s Fifth Eclectic Reader (Revised) (© 1879, 1896, 1907, 1920)

This book establishes that American public schools firmly sought to mold children’s character: love of God, country, and family was intertwined with a manifest duty to convert that love into service.

The contents included such historical, moral, and patriotic essays as Respect for the Sabbath Rewarded, The Battle of Blenheim, King Charles II and William Penn, The Righteous Never Forsaken, The Relief of Lucknow, The Goodness of God, The Hour of Prayer, The Blue and the Gray, Make Way for Liberty, How Sleep the Brave, Supposed Speech of John Adams, No Excellence Without Labor, The Boston Massacre, Sowing and Reaping, Religion the only Basis of Society, The Character of a Happy Life, and The Bible the Best of Classics.

The Elson Readers: Book Five (© 1920)

This reader has an entire section dedicated to “Our Country and Its Flag.” The essays are The Land of Liberty, The Flag of Our Country, The Name of Old Glory, The Star-Spangled Banner, The Boyhood of Lincoln, and Washington with Braddock. In another part of the reader, students are exposed to Benjamin Franklin’s writings,

One whole section emphasizes service to others rather than our modern obsession with self-fulfillment and self-esteem. In those days, service to others was seen as a pathway to truly virtuous self-fulfillment and self-esteem.

The Elson Readers: Book Six (© 1920)

The preface to this one explains that, among other things, a good reader must include “patriotic literature, rich in ideals of home and country, loyalty and service, thrift, cooperation and citizenship—ideals of which American children gained a new conception during the World War, and which the school reading should perpetuate...”

In pursuit of these ideals, students would read One County, America, The Boston Tea Party, Hail, Columbia, The Flag, Washington and the American Army, as well as Stanzas on Freedom, Our Noble Defenders, True Citizens, and Go Forth to Serve.

The Elson Readers: Book Seven (© 1921-1925)

By this level, students read an entire section titled “Our Inheritance of Freedom.” In “Stories and Songs of Liberty,” they read about Leonidas, the Spartan (“come and take it”), Robert the Bruce, England and America in 1782, The Stamp Act, Warren’s Address at Bunker Hill, Liberty or Death, Washington’s Letters to His Wife and to Governor Clinton, Song of Marion’s Men, and Times that Try Men’s Souls.

They also learned about Early America, American Scenes and Legends, amusing American stories (e.g., Mark Twain), American Workers, and “Love of Country.” That last included essays that every American once knew: Old Ironsides, The American Flag, The Flag Goes By, The Flower of Liberty, Citizenship, The Character of Washington, The Twenty-Second of February, Abraham Lincoln, O Captain! My Captain!, and America’s Answer.

Long lists get tedious, so I’ll stop here. Suffice to say that, if you take a stroll down the memory lane of your great-grandparents, you will discover that their education tackled mass immigration by inculcating all children, whether American-born or not, with love for America and the Biblical tradition that underpins America’s approach to liberty and morality.

Today’s mass immigration would be less of a problem if our schools were still teaching that our country is a unique testament to individual liberty, faith, hard work, and service. If that were the case, we wouldn’t tolerate people like Zohran Mamdani, a recent immigrant who hates this country and who sits at Washington’s desk while he spouts that hatred, all while surrounded by glum new citizens (at least 20% of whom are Muslims) who are clearly just longing to tear it all down:

 https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/07/america-used-to-handle-mass-immigration-using-patriotic-education/

'Axios: Southern Hormuz route said to remain active'

 The southern shipping route in the Strait of Hormuz remains open and active, Axios' correspondent Barak Ravid reported, citing two United States officials.

Most vessels are transiting with their electronic identification systems switched off, limiting public tracking, according to one official. They also added that Iranian forces attempt intimidation over VHF radio.

Traffic along the southern route has recently accelerated, with around 50 ships transiting, the second official added.

https://breakingthenews.net/Article/Southern-Hormuz-route-said-to-remain-active/66632585

BISHOP ROBERT BARRON: The real reason communists fear religion and want believers silenced

 Like many others, I have been alarmed by the success of certain politicians in our country who identify as extreme socialists or communists. This is not a matter of classical liberals triumphing over standard-issue conservatives; this is the victory of people who stand athwart the fundamental principles that undergird our country.

There are many reasons why I detest communism, but I want to draw attention to just one issue of supreme importance. Karl Marx said that the first critique is the critique of religion. He meant that, before a complete reworking of the politics and economics of a society can take place, religion has to be taken down. This is because religion, as he saw it, is the "opium of the masses," a drug taken to dull our sensitivity to the suffering caused by economic exploitation. As long as the suffering populace is lured into complacency by fantasies about God's providence and the promise of eternal life, they will never rise up and throw off their chains.

In making this clarification, Marx was taking a step beyond his teacher, Ludwig Feuerbach. That little-known but massively influential German intellectual had asserted that God is but a projection of the idealized self-understanding of human beings. We are knowledgeable, kind and powerful to a limited degree, but we would love to be omniscient, omnibenevolent and omnipotent. And so we project this fantasy outward and invent the character of God. And then, pathetically, we fall on our knees and worship what we have made and ask it to give us what we want. Marx completely accepted this interpretation of religion, but he asked the follow-up question: Why would we do such a thing? His answer is the opium theory — that we do it to dull our pain.

On this reading, by the way, I, as a bishop of the Catholic Church, would qualify basically as a high-level drug dealer. And during my years as a seminary professor, I was essentially a trainer of retail-level drug pushers.

Can you see, therefore, why, for convinced Marxists, people like me have to be gotten out of the way and why the fantasy we propagate has to be debunked?

But there is a second reason why the elimination of religion is of paramount significance for Marx. Communism aspires to be a totalizing system, involving the government's control over education, entertainment, communication, politics and especially economics.

What stands resolutely athwart this ambition is religion, which declares that all of these societal expressions are finally under the judgment of God. If God exists, then there is an objective moral criterion by which all of it — government, politics, economics, etc. — can be evaluated and thus delimited. 

How fascinating that the Bible, practically unique here in the literature of the ancient world, refused to deify its leaders or its political arrangements. Even David, the greatest king in the Old Testament, is frankly portrayed as an adulterer and a murderer. And all the kings of Israel — for the most part, an unsavory lot — must answer to the divine law and to the prophets who represent that law.

This is why, incidentally, the nonestablishment of religion, as well as its free exercise, enshrined in the First Amendment to our Constitution, is so vitally important. In giving religion freedom to operate independently of the state, the framers of the First Amendment permitted religion to play its properly critical role vis-à-vis the government.

Therefore, it should be clear that if one wants a totalizing system such as communism to succeed, religion has to be stamped out and its leaders have to be silenced, marginalized or, at the limit, eliminated. If you doubt me on any of this, I would encourage you to read the recent histories of China, Russia, Cuba, Nicaragua, Vietnam, Cambodia, Venezuela and Poland.

When, in June 1979, Pope John Paul II spoke in Victory Square in Warsaw, at the height of the Cold War, he was fulfilling the prophetic function of a religious leader. With the entire communist government of Poland behind him on the stage but with roughly a million of the Polish people in front of him, he spoke of God, of human rights and dignity, of the value of the individual — and the throng before him commenced to chant, "We want God! We want God! We want God!" They say it went on for 15 minutes. That moment proved to be the beginning of the end for the communist Soviet empire. Again, do you see why they're afraid of religion?

Might I encourage my fellow believers in God not to be complacent in the face of this very troubling development in the American body politic? The success of radical socialists and communists in our electoral process is, for religious people, a real and present danger. 

So vote! Speak out! Get organized!

Total CEO: Mideast producers desperate to sell oil stocks

  Middle East oil producers are desperate to sell crude stockpiled during the recent Persian Gulf conflict, but gasoline and diesel inventories remain constrained due to shipping worries, TotalEnergies SE Chief Executive Patrick Pouyanné said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-04/total-ceo-sees-mideast-producers-desperate-to-sell-oil-stocks