Search This Blog

Tuesday, September 29, 2026

ADHD, Nazis, And Climate Change

 No, this article title is not an IQ test where you have to explain which one doesn’t belong and why. These three terms seem to have nothing to do with each other.

Unless perhaps they do.

Here is how they relate: Try using each term in the following sentence: When everything is (fill in the blank), nothing is (fill in the blank).

In the U.K., seven in 10 GPs (general practitioners of medicine) believe adult ADHD is overdiagnosed, according to The Telegraph.

Assessment has become a cottage industry. Once referred to a specialist for evaluation, virtually everyone receives an ADHD diagnosis.

Once diagnosed, the industry shifts to treatment — stimulant medications, behavioral therapy, and counseling — consuming government and patient resources.

It’s one more example of the medical-industrial complex.

On this side of the pond, the Association of American Medical Colleges notes that ADHD “can be overhyped” and that few doctors are prepared to treat a condition that was “long considered an issue only for kids.”

What is adult ADHD? One thinks of a fidgety child with ADHD, or “ants in your pants,” as my grandmother would say. Adults can be afflicted as well, with typical symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity.

But where are the boundaries?

Too much coffee? Too little sleep? Stress at home or work? Too many hours staring at a smartphone? Or a true medical disorder?

When does the spectrum of normal human behavior veer into mental-health pathology?

When everything is ADHD, nothing is ADHD.

Now let’s talk about Nazis.

No one will argue that the era of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis was anything but one of the darkest periods in modern history. Yet “Hitler” and “Nazi” are thrown around like confetti when labeling political opponents.

Prominent Republicans such as Donald Trump and George W. Bush have been depicted as Hitler. To be fair, similar imagery has been directed at Barack Obama.

Political disagreements are normal. But routinely calling political opponents Hitler or Nazis turns extraordinarily grave historical terms into ordinary political insults. If any elected official can be labeled a Nazi, the word becomes just another pejorative, gradually losing its historical specificity.

If everyone is a Nazi, then no one is a Nazi.

The third overworked term is climate change.

Once upon a time, the public was warned about global cooling. A widely read 1975 Newsweek article, “The Cooling World,” warned of dramatic changes in weather patterns, declining food production, and potentially serious consequences around the world.

Later the public concern became global warming. Today the broader term is climate change.

But climate and weather are not synonymous.

A hurricane? Climate change. A drought? Climate change. Flooding? Climate change. Wildfires and heat waves? Climate change. Even unusual cold and snow can find their way beneath the same umbrella.

That doesn’t mean a changing climate cannot influence the probability or severity of certain types of weather. And throughout the history of planet Earth, the climate has been constantly changing.

It means that simply labeling every unusual or destructive weather event “climate change” is not an explanation.

When everything is climate change, nothing is climate change.

There is actually a name for what these three examples have in common: “concept creep.”

Psychologist Nick Haslam coined the term to describe what happens when the boundaries of concepts gradually expand. A word once reserved for something relatively specific begins encompassing more behaviors, events, or circumstances. Eventually its boundaries become so elastic that things once considered different — or simply less extreme — fall beneath the same umbrella.

Haslam describes this expansion in two directions. Concepts can expand outward to include qualitatively different phenomena and downward to include progressively less extreme ones.

The irony is that such expansion can ultimately diminish the very causes the terminology was intended to advance.

ADHD is a genuine neurodevelopmental disorder. But if every distracted, restless, overworked, underslept adult has ADHD, how do we distinguish those with a disabling disorder from those experiencing the ordinary frustrations of modern life?

Nazism was not merely disagreeable politics. It was a totalitarian ideology responsible for war, persecution, and industrialized mass murder. If every politician we dislike becomes Hitler and every objectionable policy becomes Nazism, what vocabulary remains when something truly resembling it appears?

Climate change provides a similar lesson. The climate changes. But that doesn’t mean every hurricane, drought, flood, wildfire, blizzard, or heat wave can simply be stamped “climate change” and the scientific work declared finished.

The point is not whether ADHD exists, whether Nazis existed, or whether climate changes.

Of course they do and did.

The point is what happens when terminology expands so far beyond its useful boundaries that it begins losing the precision that once gave it meaning.

Precision matters.

Medicine depends on diagnostic criteria because without boundaries, diagnoses lose meaning. History depends on distinctions because without them, the exceptional becomes ordinary. Science depends on testable propositions because an explanation capable of explaining every possible observation risks explaining very little.

Language works the same way.

We see similar linguistic inflation elsewhere. A disagreement becomes “hate.” An unpleasant experience becomes “trauma.” Criticism becomes “bullying.” A disputed opinion becomes “misinformation.” Words once describing relatively specific things expand until they become cultural catchalls.

Another name for this 'concept creep' might simply be crying wolf.

The boy in Aesop’s fable wasn’t wrong because wolves didn’t exist. Quite the opposite. Wolves were very real.

His mistake was sounding the alarm so indiscriminately that eventually no one paid attention.

That is the danger of linguistic inflation. The more powerful a word, the greater the temptation to deploy it. But each indiscriminate use spends a little of its power.

Eventually ADHD becomes distraction, Hitler becomes someone you didn’t vote for, and climate change becomes bad weather.

And when everything means everything, eventually words mean nothing.

 

Brian C. Joondeph, M.D., is a Colorado-based ophthalmologist who writes frequently about medicine, science, and public policy.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/09/adhd-nazis-and-climate-change/

Boston mayor handing out $575 'scholarship' for illegals to learn how to harass the government

 by Monica Showalter

A couple years ago, radio commentator and investigative reporter Howie Carr exposed the long, long, list of free goodies illegals get in Massachusettes, from housing and food, to medical and dental, to same-day dry cleaning, housekeeping twice a week, cellphones and tablets, winter coats, toiletries, tax preparation, attorneys, WIC cash, Uber rides, luggage, new beds, kitchen ranges, sofa-loveseats, towels, cutlery, plates, life coaches, holiday parties, ESl classes, notaries, parenting classes, hotel stays, U-Haul boxes,and more.

Kid you not. I wrote about it here.

Now they're getting even more, according to a report from Libs of TikTok:

The government is paying them to ... harass the government. And they call it 'scholarship.'

According to MassDailyNews, a reputable site which has an excellent detailed report:

BOSTON — Boston is paying immigrants $575 apiece to complete a 10-week course in political organizing, with no legal-status check on applicants and native-born US
Bostonians barred from the program entirely, according to the city's own website.
 
Immigrants Lead Boston, run by the Mayor's Office for Immigrant Advancement, is now in its 7th cohort under Mayor Michelle Wu.
 
The program launched under former Mayor Marty Walsh in fall 2020 and has been continued and expanded by the Wu administration.
 
The boston.gov program page states applicants may apply "regardless of their immigration status."
 
That opens the door to green-card holders, DACA recipients, refugees, asylum-seekers, and undocumented residents.
 
The same page states plainly that "Candidates must be Boston residents, immigrants."
 
That means native-born US Bostonians are not eligible to apply.
 
The current fall 2026 course runs September 21 through December 5, with participants selected from applications that were due August 17.
 
Each accepted immigrant receives a $575 scholarship "at the end of the program" for completing the course, per the city.

If that sounds illegal, it's because it is illegal, handing illegals tools to harass the officials elected by the citizens, while barring U.S. citizens and taxpayers from the same.

The news gets worse, the more you read the report:

The curriculum, per boston.gov, includes "civic engagement and community organizing," "public narrative," and "immigration history and topics impacting immigrants, racism, and equity."

 

Indoctrinating illegal migrants who've just stepped off the boat into believing they are victims living in a racist hellhole, all to secure the votes and political power to shake down whitey.

It will be taught by a radical NGO that is focused on anti-ICE protests and deportation defense, and the site boasts of its 'accomplishments' in teaching migrants how to lobby as if they were citizens in a democracy:

It also boasts of its 'success' stories:

The story was surfaced in a September 26 Substack post by investigative reporter Natalie Winters, who reported that the program launched Community Action Project grants of up to $10,000 in 2025 for community organizations partnering with immigrant participants.
 
Winters also named two past graduates who have gone on to advocate for granting driver's licenses to undocumented residents and rent control.
 
 

Now, it's not as if the Justice Department's civil rights chief, the great Harmeet Dhillon, doesn't have her plate full with just California's violations alone. But this disgusting program, which amounts to a foreign bid to undercut U.S. voters and their elected representatives, exclude non-immigrant Bostonians, and render democracy meaningless, really stands out. and I hope her DOJ acts to shut this particular racket down.

Illegals don't have any right to be here, let alone vote, or engage in any way in our political process. Anyone who has participated in this 'scholarship' program, as they like to call it, needs to be first in line for deportation. Cancelling out American voters' votes and harassing elected officials, by whatever means used, is a true destruction of our democracy, as Democrats are so fond of claiming to champion. In reality, they are using illegal means to empower illegals and that is what really destroys our democracy.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/09/boston-mayor-handing-out-575-scholarship-for-illegals-to-learn-how-to-harass-the-government/

Trump brings the federal government into the 21st century with an AI portal

 by Andrea Widburg

Few things in life are more unpleasantly inconvenient than dealing with the federal government. Whether you’re trying to figure out how to get something done or actually doing it, the federal government is remarkably opaque. Until now, its websites haven’t helped much. As anyone who has dealt with Obamacare knows, government websites can be cluttered, confusing, obstinate, and frustrating.

However, the Trump administration finally seems to be changing that through its work with a tech startup, Nation Design Studio. This is no Obamacare. Instead, it's proof that AI can and should serve the people, rather than being seen as a threat to destroy the world.

In a professional presentation with the polish of a corporate product unveiling, Secretary of State Marco Rubio demonstrates how the government’s new one-stop AI interface can be used to get a passport from the comfort of your own home. Having recently renewed my passport, I watched with more than casual interest.

My own experience was inordinately inconvenient. I went to my local drugstore last year and stood in line for 30 minutes while the clerk assisted a man who, tragically, was getting photos for his wife’s memorial service. I had a nice conversation with him about what a lovely woman his wife had been.

When it was finally my turn, the clerk took my passport photo according to what had seemingly been the standard forever: a headshot. I went home and uploaded it—I could at least renew online because I already had a passport—only to discover that the standard had changed. The photo also had to include my shoulders.

So back I went to the drugstore. The nice clerk took another photo. It was awful, but by then I didn’t care. I was not going through this over and over again.

I now possess the world’s ugliest passport photo, and will be stuck with it for almost a decade.

According to Rubio’s presentation, you shouldn’t have to go through any of this anymore. Instead, you’ll go online using your already-issued government ID, which most of us probably have by now, and the process will be seamless and easy, whether you’re applying, getting your photo, or paying for the finished passport.

The tweet below includes the video and an analysis explaining why it matters. One important point is that the technology is transparent, allowing tech people to examine it and determine whether the government is doing only what it says it is doing. There should be no mysterious behind-the-scenes games:

...government, if it works as promised, there won't be a single American who can't say their life wasn't helped at least in part by AI, or that the benefits accrued solely to zillionaires. This in itself cannily mitigates anti-datacenter sentiment.

(2) Second, Joe Gebbia and Marco Rubio's talks on simplifying name changes and passport filings introduce a completely new era where the US government is actually launching tangible features that benefit users.

 

(3) Third, this launch event in and of itself may visibly drive reform. It could become much more important than the State of the Union. Unlike laws, code is user-visible, and can be instantly audited by the public, as Obama found out with the failed obamacare website launch. So: the annual America dot gov event may be substance, whereas SOTU is traditionally optics. I wouldn't be surprised to see the President present at the next one.

(4) Fourth, this kind of event is a perfect example of where tech and red cooperate best. They both hate bureaucracy. Automating paperwork with code reduces the power of statists over both capitalists and nationalists. It's also hard to undo by other admins: once you digitize a process, hard to turn it back to paper.

(5) Fifth, it's an obvious point perhaps, but think about how much influence YCombinator has had in 20 years. From Gebbia's Airbnb joining their 2009 batch to a complete overhaul of the user interface of the US bureaucracy, and thus the US government.

(6) Sixth, this is another take on the network state. The functional part of the US (the network, meaning tech) is merging with and partially reforming the dysfunctional part (the state, meaning bureaucracy) by automating 20th century paper forms.

As a tech startup, there will no doubt be bugs and user issues and so on, but unlike with paper laws those issues will be visible and the code fixes will be verifiable. A new era of AI America. Rooting for them.

This represents an extraordinary level of government competence—or, perhaps more accurately, the kind of ordinary competence that should not seem extraordinary.

This is what government can and should do in the 21st century. Technology should make dealing with government easier, faster, and less frustrating. It should not reproduce bureaucracy in digital form.

Check out the site for yourself. If you’ve been planning to do anything with the federal government, doodle around a bit and see whether it’s easier today than it was yesterday.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/09/trump-brings-the-federal-government-into-the-21st-century-with-an-ai-portal/