Search This Blog

Wednesday, June 12, 2024

Cuomo repeats infamous ‘who cares?’ on nursing home COVID deaths in congress

 Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo repeated his infamous “who cares?” line during a grilling by a House committee Tuesday about his administration’s decision to send infected COVID-19 patients into nursing homes — resulting in thousands of deaths during the pandemic, according to a readout of his testimony released Wednesday by Republicans.

Republican majority staff from the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic said Cuomo “deflected responsibility” throughout the seven-hour interview about his administration’s devastating March 25, 2020, “must admit” order that shuttled sick patients into senior care facilities statewide.

A transcript of the testimony has yet to be released, and reps for Cuomo who were present for the interview have disputed some of the readout’s claims.

Ex-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo repeated his infamous “who cares?” line before a House committee over his administration’s decision to send infected COVID-19 patients into nursing homes.Getty Images

During the closed-door session, the 66-year-old Cuomo blamed an unidentified staff member at the New York Health Department for drafting the directive, claimed it mirrored federal guidance, was not mandatory — and dismissed the premise of the House probe as part of an ongoing political attack.

But Republicans on the panel pushed back and forced Cuomo to acknowledge the language of the state order differed from DC’s guidance, House GOP conference chairwoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and other members told reporters.

“They [Cuomo and his then-staff] want to assert that that order is exactly the same as the federal [Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines], which it is not,” upstate Rep. Marc Molinaro (R-NY) said on Tuesday during a break in the proceedings.

“The state order says, ‘You shall take back individuals and you cannot deny them solely on the basis of COVID,’ which left [nursing homes] no option but to accept individuals that we knew would cause risk to the other patients,” he explained.

Molinaro also accused Cuomo’s administration of having “cooked the books” on the nursing home death count, which was later confirmed by two state investigations, once they “knew that the order was causing great loss”

“When pressed to explain the discrepancy between the reported death count and the true mortality rate, Mr. Cuomo was shockingly callous — testifying ‘6,500 versus 9,000…who cares, what difference did it make?'” the readout of the interview on Capitol Hill shows.

GOP majority staff for the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic said Cuomo “deflected responsibility” throughout the seven-hour interview about his administration’s March 25, 2020, “must admit” order.Gregory P. Mango

“He seemed to feel very little remorse,” select subcommittee chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) told The Post and other reporters after his interview with the ex-governor. “Often [he] would be talking about a certain number of deaths in a certain place, and to him they were just numbers. They were just numbers.”

“It is mind-blowing to me that the governor, who was later to rescind or amend the directive that went out about putting COVID patients or untested patients back into nursing homes,” Wenstrup added. “He was the one who put the executive order out to amend it, but when it came to the directive itself, he had no idea where it came from and still does not. No responsibility.”

“I don’t know where the buck stops,” added Wenstrup, one of several doctors on the panel and a retired US Army colonel who received a Bronze Star for his work as a combat surgeon during the Iraq War.

A spokeswoman for the House subcommittee majority also told The Post that Cuomo used the phrases “who cares” and “what is the difference” numerous times.

“Any dismissal of the heartbreak that families who lost loved ones to COVID-19 continue to experience is unacceptable and inconsistent with the values of compassion and empathy that Americans deserve from their public officials,” subcommittee ranking member Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.) told The Post in a statement.

Auditors in 2022 confirmed the in 2023 that NY’s Department of Health had “misled the public” by leaving out at least 4,1000 nursing home deaths due to COVID-19.AP
A spokeswoman for the House subcommittee majority also told The Post that Cuomo used the phrases “who cares” and “what is the difference” numerous times.Darren McGee- Office of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo

“The point was, there was no discrepancy, as all categories were contained in the overall death number that was never in dispute,” Cuomo spokesman Rich Azzopardi said in a statement.

“What the Republicans couldn’t explain was why 1.2 million Americans died during this pandemic — more than any other country and any other war — under the lack of leadership from Trump and the Republicans that continues to this day as they put a podiatrist in charge of the COVID committee,” he added in a direct attack against Wenstrup.

In a May 2023 hearing before the select subcommittee, Rep. Ami Bera (D-Calif.), a doctor and former chief medical officer for Sacramento County, called the New York directive “medical malpractice.”

Cuomo’s response was identical to the former governor’s reaction to a January 2021 report from New York Attorney General Letitia James, who revealed his administration had low-balled the number of nursing home deaths by more than 50% by excluding residents who later died in hospitals.

Voices for Seniors, a nonprofit for families who lost loves ones to COVID-19 in nursing homes, also blasted Cuomo — saying, “WE CARE!”AP

Health Commissioner Howard Zucker responded by releasing the full data, which shifted the COVID death count from 8,711 to 12,743 as of that month.

“Who cares [if they] died in the hospital, died in a nursing home?” Cuomo erupted in a Jan. 29 press conference the day after the report was released. “They died.”

Auditors confirmed the following year that Albany’s Department of Health had “misled the public” by leaving out at least 4,100 nursing home deaths due to COVID-19 — and had “conformed its presentation to the Executive’s narrative,” meaning Cuomo.

Cuomo’s “callous” response was identical to his reaction to a January 2021 report from AG James, revealing his administration had low-balled the number of nursing home deaths by more than 50%.Kevin P. Coughlin/Office of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo

“If I knew then what I know now, I would have told my Department of Health, ‘Don’t listen to the federal government; they don’t know what they’re talking about,’” the former governor told The Post and others at the end of his transcribed interview, declining to accept full responsibility while expressing some remorse for the outcome.

He also admitted that nursing homes were “confused” by the directive, according to the readout.

Voices for Seniors, a nonprofit for families who lost loved ones to COVID-19 in nursing homes, also blasted Cuomo in a statement.

“WE CARE!” the group said. “Every time we stare at the empty chairs at our tables, we care. We care every time we want to hug our lost loved one and they aren’t by our side. We care every single day when our loved ones can’t share in our joys or comfort us in our lows. We care because Cuomo failed to protect our senior citizens that trusted him.”

“There is no confusion that ordering a deadly virus into nursing homes caused the demise of thousands,” they added. “We look forward to Andrew Cuomo being brought to justice for the 15,000 innocent victims and us grieving families.”

“If I knew then what I know now, I would have told my Department of Health, ‘Don’t listen to the federal government; they don’t know what they’re talking about,’” the embattled ex-governor told The Post.Josh Christenson

Wenstrup indicated it was “very likely” the former New York governor — who may challenge Eric Adams for New York City mayor in 2025 — will be back in Congress again this year for a public hearing.

“It’s not only just the people in New York that deserve this, because they do,” he said, “but I think the whole country does.”

https://nypost.com/2024/06/12/us-news/andrew-cuomo-repeats-infamous-who-cares-line-on-nursing-home-covid-deaths-in-congressional-interview/

Antisemitic vandals’ graffiti included Hamas symbol for targeted killings

Antisemitic vandals who defaced the Brooklyn Museum director’s co-op Tuesday night painted a red triangle on the front door — a symbol that has been widely used in Hamas propaganda showing Israelis marked for death.

The anti-Israel activists targeted museum director Anne Pasternak’s apartment building in Brooklyn Heights as well as the homes of other Jewish board members, shocking photos show.

Among the graffiti on Pasternak’s home was the red inverted triangle. One other home that was vandalized also shows a red triangle.

The triangle became a prevalent symbol online and offline beginning in November 2023 following Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel and Israel’s aggressive retaliatory offensive, according to the Anti Defamation League.

It first appeared in propaganda videos from the al-Qassam brigades — Hamas’ military wing — to highlight an Israeli soldier that was about to be killed or wounded in a targeted attack by the terrorists.

In the clips, the red triangle followed the target, which was then hit with a sniper’s bullet, a rocket-propelled grenade or another deadly blast.

“Though it can be used innocuously in general pro-Palestine social media posts, the inverted red triangle is now used to represent Hamas itself and glorify its use of violence in many popular anti-Zionist memes and political cartoons,” the ADL says on its website

For example, the group said, anti-Israel protesters will put the symbol over an image of Israeli soldiers or on a Star of David “as a way to call for further violent resistance.”

The activists also scrawled “Anne Pasternak Brooklyn Museum White Supremacist Zionist” in a sign on her home. Other messages claimed the museum leader “had blood on your hands.”

The stunt was widely condemned by local officials, including New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who said this was not a case of peaceful protests or free speech.

“This is a crime, and it’s overt, unacceptable anti-Semitism,” Adams said in a statement.

He apologized to Pasternak and vowed to bring those responsible to justice.

https://nypost.com/2024/06/12/us-news/brooklyn-museum-directors-door-painted-with-hamas-red-triangle/

US can stop border-crossing terrorists with Obama administration policies

 

Near-misses from the worst mass migration border crisis in American history keep coming at us like machine-gun fire.

This month, FBI counterterrorism agents arrested six Tajikistani nationals on terrorism charges after they illegally crossed the southwest border from Mexico, apparently foiling a terror plot linked to the ISIS-K terror group in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The arrests came soon after a Russian who illegally crossed the border was convicted and sentenced in California on terrorism charges for buying weaponry for an al Qaeda group in Syria, as the FBI said he would have gone kinetic had he not been charged.

In May, a Jordanian national who illegally crossed the border from Mexico staged a vehicle ramming attack on Marine Corps Base Quantico that all involved federal agencies refuse to publicly rule out as a terror incident.

This year, Border Patrol agents overrun by the mass migration crisis have accidentally released at least seven immigrants who were on the FBI’s terrorism watch list when they illegally crossed the southern border, according to multiple reports, sparking frantic manhunts to capture them.

That’s just a fractional few of many disturbing cases.

For years prior to the historic mass migration crisis that President Biden kicked off on his inauguration day in 2021, the US media laughed off the threat of terrorist border infiltration as the stuff of baseless right-wing fear-mongering — such as when then-President Donald Trump said in 2018 that Middle Easterners were moving with US-bound caravans through Central America and Mexico.

Much good company has joined the once-ridiculed Paul Reveres, including FBI Director Christopher Wray and the apparently spooked authors of a surprisingly anxious Foreign Affairs magazine essay published this week.

But while many are sounding border infiltration alarms, few have offered solutions.

Perhaps Republican border hawks should turn to an unexpected ally: Democratic Party stalwart Jeh Johnson, President Barack Obama’s secretary of homeland security.

In 2016, during his final months in office, Johnson became a true believer in the threat posed by “special interest aliens,” or SIAs: border-crossing migrants from 35 to 40 nations where Islamic terrorist groups are active.

After 9/11, one of the most important counterterrorism protocols implemented on the border required agents to detain all SIAs until they could undergo face-to-face interviews to determine if these total strangers harbored potential terror connections or intent.

In June 2016, Johnson was so fearful about SIA border crossers that he sent a memorandum to his top deputies demanding their “immediate attention” to “the increased global movement of SIAs.”

He ordered the formation of a “multi-DHS Component SIA Joint Action Group” that would assess the entire program and create a tightly coordinated international action plan to “counter the threats posed by the smuggling of SIAs.” 

“I want to ensure we are bringing the full resources of the Department to bear in a coordinated manner on the issue of SIAs,” he wrote, to build on existing counter-SIA programs.

Johnson’s completely prudent plan to intensify the vetting of SIAs at the border and to take down terrorist smugglers in other countries got lost in the chaos of the transition to Donald Trump’s presidency.

His intended revamp never happened — and the catastrophic Biden-engineered mass migration crisis vaporized whatever was left of it.

While SIA traffic over the border had previously amounted to 3,000 to 4,000 individuals annually, SIA traffic since 2021 has reached an unimaginable 70,000 to 80,000 per year.

Federal intelligence and law enforcement officials could no longer interview even a smidgeon of those SIAs, who are mostly waved into the country with no interviews.

“Due to massive numbers of illegal aliens overwhelming CBP, in-depth face-to-face interviews are nonexistent,” former Chief Border Patrol Agent Rodney Scott testified before the House Judiciary Committee last September on the subject of terrorist border infiltration.

The first fix is, of course, almost too obvious to mention: Reduce the total numbers of illegal aliens pouring over the southwest border.

But the far less obvious fix is this one, regardless of how many are crossing: We must resurrect Johnson’s 2016 initiative to interview SIAs before they are released on asylum, and target their smugglers for prosecution and prison.

As importantly, we must adequately fund and equip this massive effort — no matter how many SIAs arrive.

If Johnson’s 2016 plan was nonpartisan enough for the Obama administration, it should be good enough for the Biden DHS, or a Trump one. And, we can hope, not too late to stop the next terrorism attempt within the United States.

Todd Bensman, a senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, is the author of “America’s Covert Border War” (2021).

https://nypost.com/2024/06/12/opinion/obamas-policies-can-stop-border-crossing-terrorists/