Search This Blog

Wednesday, January 22, 2025

India offers to take back 18K illegal migrants from US while pushing to safeguard visas: report

 India is reportedly seeking to entice the Trump administration to safeguard access to key visa programs for its citizens with an offer to repatriate some tens of thousands of Indians who are illegally residing in the US.

Thus far, US officials have flagged 18,000 illegal immigrants from India they want to deport, though some believe the figure might wind up being higher, Bloomberg reported.

Historically, India has been cooperative with the US on repatriations, but the move seemingly comes as an overture to President Trump amid concerns that his administration will toughen up visa requirements and trade policy.

The US and India are reportedly in talks to repatriate tens of thousands of illegal immigrants from India.AFP via Getty Images

Late last year, elements of Trump’s base had fractured over the H-1B visa program, which creates an avenue for specialty workers to live in the US and fill key jobs.

About 72% of the 386,000 H-1B visas granted in 2023 came from Indian citizens, according to government data.

Amid the infighting, Trump revealed that he intends to back the program.

But there are other ones such as student visas that India hopes will be left open as well, per Bloomberg.

Then there are lingering concerns that Trump may ramp up tariffs against India.

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi had a friendly relationship with President Trump during the latter’s first term.REUTERS

New Delhi has a higher tariff gap with the US, eclipsing Mexico and Canada, per a Moneycontrol analysis.

Overall, illegal immigration from India comprised about 3% of border encounters, according to the US Customs and Border Protection.

However, illegal immigration from India into the US has remained at elevated levels over recent years, particularly due to increasing crossings from the northern US border.

The Department of Homeland Security previously estimated that around 220,000 illegal immigrants from India lived in the US in 2022.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar Tuesday.AFP via Getty Images

Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with his counterpart, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on Tuesday after getting sworn in as the nation’s top diplomat.

Concerns about illegal immigration also came up during the meeting, according to a readout from the State Department.

“Jaishankar affirmed a shared commitment to continuing to strengthen the partnership between the United States and India,” the readout explained.

“Secretary Rubio also emphasized the Trump Administration’s desire to work with India to advance economic ties and address concerns related to irregular migration.”

A spokesperson for India’s Ministry of External Affairs also emphasized that New Delhi and Washington have been cooperating on illegal immigration.

“As part of India-US cooperation on migration and mobility, both sides are engaged in a process to deter illegal migration. This is being done to create more avenues for legal migration from India to the US,” spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told Bloomberg.

Trump has been threatening US trade partners with tariffs while seeking to get concessions on key issues.REUTERS

“The latest deportation of Indian nationals from the US by a chartered flight is a result of this cooperation.”

India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi had cultivated close ties with Trump during the latter’s first administration.

Trump has blasted out tariff threats against neighboring Mexico and Canada, as well as China.

The Post reached out to the White House, State Department and India’s embassy in Washington, DC, for comment.

https://nypost.com/2025/01/22/us-news/india-offers-to-take-back-18k-illegal-migrants-while-pushing-to-safeguard-visas-report/

CNN to lay off hundreds of employees

 Warner Bros. Discovery’s

 CNN plans to lay off hundreds of employees Thursday as it refocuses the business around a global digital audience, according to people familiar with the matter.

The layoffs come as CNN is rearranging its linear TV lineup and building out digital subscription products. The cuts will help CNN lower production costs and consolidate teams, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss nonpublic changes.

Certain shows that are produced in New York or Washington may move to Atlanta, where production can be done more cheaply, said the people.

For the most part, the job cuts won’t affect CNN’s most recognizable names, who are under contract, said the people. CNN has about 3,500 employees worldwide.

During a town hall meeting earlier this month, CNN CEO Mark Thompson said the media company has received an investment of “more than $70 million” from Warner Bros. Discovery to help fund the company’s digital operations. Part of that investment will go toward hiring employees in areas where CNN sees potential growth avenues, such as data scientists and product development.

In October, CNN launched a digital paywall, charging heavier users of the site $3.99 per month.

NBC News is also planning cuts later this week, according to people familiar with the matter. While the exact number couldn’t be determined, the job losses will be well under 50, two of the people said.

Spokespeople for NBC News and CNN declined to comment.

Both news organizations waited until after the U.S. presidential inauguration to make the cuts. The news media landscape is in transition as fewer people watch linear TV and more consume their news on streaming services and through social media.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/22/cnn-to-lay-off-hundreds-of-employees-post-inauguration.html

This Transition Is Already A Huge Historical Marker

 by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

There is plenty of time ahead for the peanut gallery to discuss the ins and outs of the daily goings-on with the new Trump administration. There will be good and bad, and everyone is free to call out which is what and can do so for fully four years.

For now, we pause to consider the historic nature of what is taking place in our times and be grateful that we are all around to watch it unfold. And we should consider the lessons it offers for our own lives.

 

There is the obvious data point that President Donald Trump is only the second nonconsecutive second-term president after Grover Cleveland. That’s interesting but hardly scratches the surface of the significance of this presidency.

 

Anyone who prophesied two years ago that Trump would be taking the oath of office would have likely been considered a lunatic.

The whole of corporate media was railing against his legacy. The historians were writing him off. Google was gaming its search results to shame anyone who still defended him. Big tech and nearly the whole of academia were united in loathing. The sneering on late-night television was the only consistent theme.

Meanwhile, the big guns were coming for him personally with indictment after indictment. There is warfare and there is lawfare but the desire to destroy is the same. There was talk of confiscating Trump Tower and even jail. The revenge fantasies were out of control, while his attorneys’ fees were sky-high, millions upon millions of dollars.

There was no power center in the United States or really the world that was not overflowing with loathing and brutal attacks, including every attempted extortion and smear.

It is impossible to not give Trump personal credit for seeing his way through a series of threats and attacks that would have broken even the strongest character. Somehow he managed to get through it all with his physical and mental well-being not only saved but even strengthened.

How did he sleep? How did he keep his spirits high? How did he see the light at the end of this long, dark tunnel? It’s unfathomable.

I don’t care what your politics are: If you cannot see this example of steadfastness and courage as inspiring, there is something wrong. Is there anything wrong in your life to compare? It’s doubtful. He made it through and so can you. If nothing else is true, his personal example of courage in the face of grave danger is exemplary.

He had plenty of competitors for the Republican nomination, and they were right to challenge him, not based on a lack of respect but simply because of their own confidence that they could do the job. But at this stage of history, Trump was already legendary and approaching a status of personal grandeur that no one could match. Thus did he get the nomination and his competitors defer.

Panic among mainstream opinion makers ensued once again. The unthinkable happened: the first assassination attempt. It’s impossible to look at the circumstances surrounding that quarter-inch miss and not feel a sense of awe.

It’s difficult to explain without taking recourse to divine intervention. Equally remarkable was Trump’s response, not to cower and collapse but stand and assure the people for whom he felt responsibility that he was alive. And he used that precious and catastrophic moment to rally the people with immortal words, fist in the air.

Will that moment go down in history? It became obvious in the days following that the powers that be did not want it to do so. Within a week or so, it was hard to find information about this at all, as the major national media simply stopped talking about it. That left it to the masses of regular people who simply could not suppress their astonishment at what transpired.

Alternative media swung into action as did the meme makers and the merchants with shirts, cups, and posters. There was to be no burying this event.

Our times are absolutely desperate for examples of masculine heroism. The culture has been nearly purged of such, from movies to television to music. What Trump did was countercultural in every sense of the term: It went against the grain and disturbed the powers that be. This event became a mighty symbol of cultural renewal, a template for an entire generation to understand the sacrifices that are often necessary for success.

Behind the scenes, the Trump loyalists were hard at work, mostly in private by design, and with one focus: Get him to a second term. How in the world could they have confidence that this was possible? It comes down to one word—math. They knew what the whole of mainstream culture denied, namely that the results of the 2020 election were not mathematically possible.

Trump actually won more popular votes than he did four years earlier. The difference was the implausible appearance of 15 million to 20 million votes for his opponent that could not have reflected the choices and behaviors of real people. To right this wrong—or at least expose it—they attempted to use the courts, but the challenges were rejected on grounds of standing, as if voters themselves have no right at all to challenge what, for appearances, looked like voter fraud.

Team Trump knew that the numbers did not add up, and so they plotted a return.

It broke down to three steps.

No. 1: They would work with states that were willing to tighten voter registration laws and crack down on mail-in balloting that everyone on the planet knows is more susceptible to fraud. They would recruit monitors. They would empower a grassroots movement to be vigilant against illicit balloting. And they would encourage early voting among the base. They knew that blue states would not cooperate, but they counted on a cultural movement to shame attempts to game the system.

No. 2: They would fire up the most disenfranchised group in the United States about whom no one seems to care, namely men younger than the age of 35. This is a group that had long lost any hope in elections and has been wholly overlooked by cultural elites. To reach them, Trump went on many podcasts, including Joe Rogan’s and many others. He knew he already had their support, but he needed something else: for them to register and actually vote. That’s a big ask, but it worked.

No. 3: The need to create a mass cultural movement that was larger and more powerful than the mass media. It needed hats, songs, rallies, and meetings. To this end, he flew all over the country to hold rallies at which he did what he does best, extemporaneous stand-ups talking about the events of the day, filled with humor, fun, and fury. These became massive events, with people lining up for a mile outside the venue, waiting in all weather for 12 hours and longer.

By the end of the campaign, there was not a single indoor venue in America that could hold all the people who lined up to see Trump speak in any town or city in this country. That is an amazing accomplishment, never before seen in our history. The result was precisely what was planned, a mass movement that competed with or even outpaced the smearbund working to defeat him.

Again, this was the plan all along, although it was never announced. It was like clockwork. The people least surprised on Election Night were all associated with Team Trump. They had mapped it out for years. As part of their planning, they deployed a method that has never before been seen in U.S. politics: absolute security of all information. No one associated with this group spoke to the press for four years.

It’s been the same for the transition. It has been privately financed to keep the prying eyes of the administrative state away from understanding and thus subverting what it is they have been planning. This is why nearly every pick for the Cabinet and agency heads has been a shock but for those whom the team released early as a deliberate trial balloon.

One must stand in admiration of all this, not just the administrative sophistication of the campaign and transition team but also the courage it required to follow through on all these plans despite the terrible odds. This alone is for the ages.

Now we are at the moment that is the real test: the time of governing. We are in for some huge surprises, of that I am sure. The national media has been locked out and understandably so. Some of what will unfold in the coming days, weeks, and months I will like and some I will not. I’m sure you will say the same. That’s the way the real world works. We have plenty of time to argue about this or that.

Let’s just take a moment to appreciate that we have this opportunity at all. Against all odds, Trump is president again. Let that be a lesson to all of us. Nothing is written that moral courage cannot overcome. That’s true in politics, and it is true in our own lives.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/transition-already-huge-historical-marker

Trump Doubles-Down On Plan To Return American Education 'Back To The States'

 by Jack Roberts via Campus Reform,

President Trump has reinforced his intent to bring education “back to the states.”

In a pre-inaugural speech made at a rally in Washington, D.C. on Sunday, Trump outlined various policies he hopes his second administration will achieve in the near future.

On the topic of education, Trump highlighted Education Secretary nominee Linda McMahon, whom he called “fantastic.”

”And a very special woman, Linda McMahon, is going to be our future Secretary of Education, which we’re going to be giving back to the states,” Trump remarked.

“Let the state run education.”

Trump also said how he told McMahon, “if you do a great job, you will put yourself out of a job. Because you’re going to be sending it back to the states.”

In his announcement of McMahon in November, Trump reiterated his desire to decentralize the American education system.

”Linda will use her decades of Leadership experience, and deep understanding of both Education and Business, to empower the next Generation of American Students and Workers, and make America Number One in Education in the World,” the then president-elect wrote at the time.

“We will send Education BACK TO THE STATES, and Linda will spearhead that effort.”

Trump also called McMahon, who served as the administrator of the Small Business Administration during his first term, a “fierce advocate for Parents’ Rights.”

”As Secretary of Education, Linda will fight tirelessly to expand ‘Choice’ to every State in America, and empower parents to make the best Education decisions for their families,” he added.

In the 2024 Republican platform, the party pledged to fight to ”ensure safe learning environments free from political meddling, and restore Parental Rights.” Included in the plan were efforts to advance “Universal School Choice,” combat Critical Race Theory and “Gender Indoctrination,” as well as “Return Education to the States.”

”We are going to close the Department of Education in Washington, D.C. and send it back to the States, where it belongs, and let the States run our educational system as it should be run,” the platform states.

”It is our goal to bring Education in the United States to the highest level, one that it has never attained before!”

Abolishing the Education Department has been a core tenet of Republican presidential campaigns dating back to Ronald Reagan in 1980, who said that education “is the principal responsibility of local school systems, teachers, parents, citizen boards and state governments.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-doubles-down-plan-return-american-education-back-states

'Trump's DEI cuts force Davos elite to find new words for diversity'

 President Donald Trump's escalating pressure on the private sector to ditch diversity programs has left some in Davos searching for new words to describe workplace practices they say are essential to their businesses.

Trump has issued a series of executive orders cutting federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, which attempt to promote opportunities for women, ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ people and other traditionally underrepresented groups.

He has also sought to dissuade private companies that receive government contracts from factoring underrepresentation into hiring decisions.

Trump's moves on DEI have reverberated through the corridors of the World Economic Forum's annual meeting in Davos, where gender parity, diverse workforces and better representation of minorities around the world continue to be key goals.

While tech companies Meta and Amazon, which hold U.S. government contracts, say they are scaling back some initiatives, other executives at Davos told Reuters they will remain, if by another name.

"There's a lot of talk and a lot of maybe even controversy around the names of things," said Miguel Stilwell d'Andrade, CEO of Portugal's largest utility company EDP,, which has 40% of its investments focused on renewable energy in the U.S.

"The important thing is we want to have the best talent in the company, from wherever it may be, men, women, different ethnicities, and we want to make sure that people ... have the best working conditions and feel comfortable," he said.

"We're not working for DEI tick the box," Stilwell added.

Other policymakers and executives said the acronym DEI had become damaging, even as they doubled down on their commitment to diversity.

"It became toxic, as has ESG, and there are some wrong reasons for that and there are some right reasons for that," Luftey Siddiqi, Special Envoy of the Head of the Interim Government of Bangladesh, said on a panel about gender parity.

"But I'm more interested in what is effective, how do we get to the result as opposed to the label," Siddiqi added.

DEI initiatives were introduced by many companies and governments around the world to address historical inequities in the workforce. While some gains have been made in recent years, gender parity has not been reached in any country.

Proponents warn that continued rollbacks may endanger recent advances.

Reuters spoke with at least three tech executives whose companies have contracts with the U.S. government. They said they remained committed to diversity programs in the workplace.

Although the risk of losing contracts because of Trump's executive orders would force them to look for new ways to describe DEI initiatives, they would not cut them entirely.

One European tech company executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Reuters that it would not be rowing back on its commitment to inclusion and diversity.

"For many years we have worked to shape a more sustainable, equitable world. It's rooted in our company culture," the person said.

"The world is diverse and employee base reflects that diversity. It is one of the keys to great innovation and is good for business."

Not all in Davos share that sentiment.

Alexandr Wang, CEO of high-profile start-up Scale AI, cheered Trump's executive orders in a post on X and called for the promotion of MEI (merit, excellence and intelligence) in tech.

Nikki Haley, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, also welcomed what she said was a retreat from DEI.

"In every business, you are starting to see pulling back from DEI and I welcome that, I think it's really important," Haley told a panel on the sidelines of the WEF meeting.

"What we're seeing in America, everybody just wants to be Americans. They don't want to be a label. They don't feel like they can take it anymore," Haley added.

One European industrial company with a large U.S. footprint said it would continue with its diversity and inclusion programs because they were important to the business as well as society.

"We will stick to our values of tolerance and respect; inclusion is important," a board member told Reuters, adding: "Companies need to stay the course of the agenda in terms of values and policies, and that's what we're doing."

"You want diverse opinions in the room and you want every opinion to have a similar weight. You want to move away from group think, especially when the pace of change is so rapid."

MONEY FLOWS

Investment in diversity is also unlikely to dry up because of Trump's moves, said bankers at Davos.

"For the investors of this world, ESG criteria – of which DEI is a part – are very important and will continue to be very important," said Bain & Company's Alexander Schmitz, who heads up the firm's Private Equity practice in EMEA.

"When I look at it from a higher level, the overarching, mega themes of ESG investing are still there: I haven't seen much rolling back of that as yet. If you are a private equity fund and start rolling back DEI strategies, then – among other effects – you will likely have a problem in fundraising and that's not where you want to be.”

Bank of America Chief Executive Brian Moynihan described diversity as having "commercial logic".

"There's going to be a lot of good, courageous conversations going on," Moynihan said. "Do we have the thoughtful balance right in companies and institutions ... Do we have the balance right that everybody feels included?"

Greenwich LifeSciences submits Phase 3, commercial manufacturing data

 Preparation for Filing of BLA in the US

In addition to the submission of the Phase III clinical data, submitting commercial manufacturing data will be critical to the filing of a Biological License Application (BLA) for GLSI-100 in the US and for regulatory filings in other countries.

Commercial Manufacturing

The first three commercial lots of GP2 active ingredient were manufactured in 2023 in an approved commercial facility, which could be used to prepare approximately 200,000 doses of GP2. In addition, drug stability programs have been initiated. Data on these commercial lots were submitted to the FDA in the US and European regulators (EMA) in Europe and will continue to be reviewed.

In 2024, the first of three commercial lots filling GP2 into vials for commercial sale or for clinical use was manufactured in an approved commercial facility, and final testing of this first lot is nearing completion. The Company may choose to use these finished commercial vials in FLAMINGO-01, subject to regulatory review.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/01/22/3013290/0/en/Greenwich-LifeSciences-Provides-Update-on-Commercial-Manufacturing.html