Search This Blog

Monday, August 18, 2025

About the OTC Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration

 It was just what the doctor didn't order.

A Utah woman in her 60s had glaucoma and hoped to protect her eye health through better nutrition. So she took a daily 20-mg supplement of lutein, a carotenoid found in produce that's been shown to help prevent progression of age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

So far, so good. But why did she develop crystal deposits within her retina that are known as "foveal sparkles"? Blame her very healthy diet.

As a 2016 case reportopens in a new tab or window revealed, the woman had "an unusually high dietary consumption of lutein, which included a broccoli, kale, spinach, and avocado smoothie every morning."

After the medical staff stepped in, she cut out the supplement, but not the shakes. The crystals resolved in one eye -- but not the other -- at 7 months.

It turns out that anti-AMD supplements aren't always an uncomplicated therapy.

Too much can be a problem, as the Utah woman discovered. On the other hand, too little is a risk when supplement products are counterfeit or fail to contain the claimed compounds.

Here's a look at five things to know about supplements and AMD.

Evidence Is Strong for Preventing AMD Progression

A pair of studies support the use of so-called AREDS2 supplementsopens in a new tab or window in patients with intermediate or advanced AMD in one or both eyes. The supplements -- which contain high doses of vitamins C and E, zinc, lutein, and zeaxanthin along with copper -- appear to reduce disease progression by about 25%.

The supplements are "particularly helpful in decreasing progression to neovascular (wet) AMD, the form of advanced disease that most rapidly threatens sight," said TiarnĂ¡n Keenan, MD, PhD, of the National Eye Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, in an interview.

The initial Age-Related Eye Disease Studyopens in a new tab or window (AREDS), published in 2001, first showed benefit from vitamin C and E, zinc, copper, and beta-carotene.

In 2013, the AREDS2 trialopens in a new tab or window showed that a new formulation continued to provide benefit. Beta-carotene was removed following reports that it boosted the risk of lung cancer, and the amount of zinc was lowered. Lutein and zeaxanthin were added.

Why do AREDS formulations work? Keenan said vitamins C and E "have strong antioxidant properties, and oxidative stress is known to be an important factor in AMD pathophysiology."

Lutein and zeaxanthin are also antioxidants and linked to reductions in inflammation and sun damage from ultraviolet rays. And, they're both "specifically concentrated in the eye," said Paul S. Bernstein, MD, PhD, of the University of Utah School of Medicine in Salt Lake City. "If the eye goes out of its way to actually concentrate a nutrient in its eye, that's a sign it's likely to be very important for function."

It's unclear why zinc is beneficial, Kennan said. As for copper, the National Eye Institute says it's addedopens in a new tab or window to fend off zinc-related copper deficiency.

New Data Suggest Another Benefit

Recent research has revealed additional benefits of AREDS2 for geographic atrophy, an advanced form of dry AMD.

In a report published this yearopens in a new tab or window, Keenan's team analyzed the AREDS and AREDS2 trials and found signs that the AREDS2 supplements slow geographic atrophy toward the central macula by about 60%.

This suggests the supplements may help preserve central vision by protecting the fovea, the most critical area for detailed sight, Keenan said.

"Given their excellent safety profile, clinicians should consider whether their patients with non-central geographic atrophy may benefit from these supplements," he said. "However, given these were post-hoc analyses, we need to perform a new dedicated clinical trial to test this. We are hoping to begin a trial like this in the coming 1 to 2 years."

Supplements May Not Protect Patients Who Don't Have AMD

There's no evidence that the AREDS2 supplements are beneficial in patients at risk of AMD who haven't developed it yet.

As Keenan explained, the AREDS studies were specifically designed to examine disease progression, not prevention of initial onset.

Studying that form of prevention would be extremely challenging, he said, since "it would require an extremely large and long clinical trial."

Anti-AMD Supplements Aren't for Everyone

The zinc component of AREDS2 formulations may pose special risks for people with certain metabolic diseases, as they may not metabolize it the same way as others, said Sheldon Rowan, PhD, of Tufts University School of Medicine and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy in Boston, in an interview.

The original AREDS study used 80 mg of zinc, but AREDS2 also tested 25 mg of zinc and found that dropping it down to that dosage seemed to work "just as well and with less stomach upset," Bernstein said.

Also, some people tolerate the supplements less well, Keenan noted. "In these cases, some suggestions include taking them with food, keeping well-hydrated, splitting the dose rather between morning and evening, or trying a different brand with the same formulation."

ConsumerLab.com, which independently tests health and nutrition products, warns patientsopens in a new tab or window to "be aware of unnecessarily high doses of zinc in some vision formulas, which can potentially cause adverse effects, including anemia."

Drug interactions could also spell trouble, especially since AREDS combinations include higher doses of vitamins and minerals than provided in regular supplements, Rowan said.

And, as the health-obsessed Utah woman discovered, overdoing the AREDS components isn't a good idea. "More is not always better," said Bernstein, who wrote up the case with colleagues.

Supplement Manufacturers May Mislead Customers

The AREDS2 formula contains 500 mg of vitamin C, 400 IU of vitamin E, 2 mg of copper (cupric oxide), 10 mg of lutein, 2 mg of zeaxanthin, and 80 mg of zinc. But manufacturers may mislead consumers.

2015 studyopens in a new tab or window reported that only four of 11 top-selling AREDS supplement products contained the recommended levels of the ingredients.

As the report noted, "under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, dietary supplements are not evaluated or regulated for efficacy or safety. Approval from the Food and Drug Administration is not required for manufacturers to market dietary supplements."

Counterfeit products are also a risk. According to ConsumerLab.com, a 2023 report said counterfeitsopens in a new tab or window of Bausch + Lomb's PreserVision AREDS2 supplement had been sold on Amazon. And the MacuHealth supplement company has warnedopens in a new tab or window of counterfeits of its products.

ConsumerLab.com offers guidance for consumersopens in a new tab or window about safely buying supplements.

Disclosures

Keenan and Rowan disclosed no relevant relationships with industry. Bernstein disclosed relationships with Kemin, Bausch + Lomb, Heidelberg, DSM-Firmenich, and OmniActive.


https://www.medpagetoday.com/spotlight/asrs-amd/117037

Wall Street sees new obesity pills as priced near Wegovy and Zepbound

 U.S. prices for obesity-treatment pills that Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk aim to launch next year likely will be on par with their weight-loss injections, analysts and investors say, in a departure from the usual practice of charging more for new medicines despite pressure to cut prices.

Neither drugmaker has disclosed pricing plans for their new daily oral medications. With regulatory approvals and launches still months away, pricing plans could change. Denmark-based Novo expects approval later this year and to launch soon after, while Indianapolis-based Lilly expects to launch by August 2026.

Novo's Wegovy and Lilly's Zepbound, administered as weekly injections, are the only highly effective weight-loss drugs targeting the GLP-1 hormone, and the United States is their biggest market. U.S. list prices are about $1,000 per month or more, with both companies offering a monthly supply for $499 to customers paying cash rather than using health insurance.

Both companies have said they developed oral weight-loss drugs to meet patient needs and widen access to the market, mindful that some people are averse to injections.

The pills, however, are not more effective than the injections. Lilly said this month its pill orforglipron cut weight by 12.4% after 72 weeks in a trial. That compares with weight loss of 15% for Novo's daily oral semaglutide. Both trail Lilly's injection at up to 21%.

UBS analyst Trung Huynh said that will cap Lilly's pricing. The price is "probably going to come on par with the current drugs today or slightly lower," Huynh said.

TD Cowen analyst Michael Nedelcovych said he expects Novo's pill to debut near Wegovy's price, citing the precedent of its diabetes pill Rybelsus being priced at parity with injection Ozempic, the diabetes-treatment version of Wegovy. Novo executives told analysts this month they were not in a hurry for discount pricing for the new pill.

Oral GLP-1 drugs will fill a niche rather than displace injections, according to analysts. TD Cowen estimates that pills will account for a percentage share of the global obesity drug market in the mid-teens by 2030, which could reach $150 billion by then.

GROWING CASH PAY

U.S. doctors, patients and insurers are pressing for lower prices to make the weight-loss drugs more affordable for the 40% of Americans who are obese. Typically, drugmakers launch new drugs at higher prices, citing scientific advances. President Donald Trump and lawmakers from both parties have urged the companies to reduce U.S. prices.

Novo declined to comment on pricing, pointing to August 6 comments by David Moore, its U.S. operations head, saying that the company may tap customers paying cash directly via its new NovoCare pharmacy, which was launched this year to sell Wegovy outside of insurance.

A Lilly spokesperson called it premature to comment on pricing and launch plans for its pill because the company has not yet submitted data for regulatory approval.

Peak annual sales forecasts for Lilly's orforglipron fell to as low as $10 billion after its trial data from earlier estimates of up to $30 billion, according to a Reuters review of analyst estimates. HSBC forecasts $15 billion in peak annual sales for Novo's pill, while Barclays expects only $1 billion.

MANUFACTURING VOLUME

A key question is how much supply will be available at the time of launch. Shortages of injectable GLP-1s in 2023 and 2024 opened the U.S. market to cheaper compounded versions as the manufacturers failed to anticipate the huge demand.

"It's all about scale and pricing," said Kevin Gade, portfolio manager at Bahl & Gaynor, which owns Lilly shares.

Gade pointed to Novo's manufacturing challenge. A weekly regimen of the pill requires about 75 times more active ingredient than the highest-dose weekly Wegovy injection, two analysts told Reuters.

Lilly has said it already has $808.5 million in orforglipron inventory for next year's expected launch. Novo has said it will launch its pill without supply constraints after billions of dollars in investment to expand semaglutide production.

Despite the high production needs, Novo is unlikely to debut its pill at a higher price than Wegovy, said Karen Andersen, healthcare strategist at Morningstar.

"Particularly in the growing cash-pay market, I doubt it can risk a launch at a premium to Wegovy," Andersen added.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/analysis-wall-street-sees-obesity-100512080.html

Trump Administration Said to Discuss Taking a 10% Stake in Intel

 --The Trump administration is in talks to take a stake of about 10% in Intel, worth about $10.5 billion, Bloomberg reported, citing a White House official and other people familiar with the matter.

--The administration is considering an investment in the chipmaker that would involve converting some or all of the company's grants from the U.S. Chips and Science Act into equity, according to the people familiar with the matter, Bloomberg reported.

--Intel has been slated to receive a combined $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants for commercial and military production, the report said.

--White House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on the specifics of the discussions, and Intel didn't immediately respond to a request for comment, according to the report.

https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/202508185768/trump-administration-considers-a-10-stake-in-intel-bloomberg-says-citing-sources

Trump says he’ll sign order targetting mail-in ballots, voting machines ahead of 2026 midterms

 President Trump unveiled plans Monday to sign an executive order claiming to “help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections” by banning both mail-in voting and electronic tabulation machines.

“I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we’re at it, Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES,” Trump declared on Truth Social.

The president did not provide any evidence to back up his claims that voting machines are “highly inaccurate.” Most voters live in municipalities where they cast paper ballots that are scanned by voting machines and are subject to multiple checks to ensure accuracy.

“WE WILL BEGIN THIS EFFORT, WHICH WILL BE STRONGLY OPPOSED BY THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY CHEAT AT LEVELS NEVER SEEN BEFORE, by signing an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections,” Trump went on.

President Trump vowed to lead a “movement” against mail-in ballots.REUTERS
President Trump previously took aim at mail-in ballots via executive action in March.REUTERS
The president did not elaborate on what the executive order would entail or when he would sign it.

Elections in the US are largely decentralized and administered at the state and local level, with some input from the federal government.

There are several laws on the books, such as the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, that lay federal ground rules for states and municipalities.

The Federal Election Commission oversees campaign practices by candidates seeking national office, the Election Assistance Commission provides resources to states and local governments in administering elections and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency works to protect voting infrastructure.

Back in March 2021, President Joe Biden signed an executive order instructing federal agencies to find ways to expand voter registration — a move that was heavily criticized by Republicans.

Trump signed an executive order in March attempting to block states from tabulating mail-in ballots that have been postmarked by Election Day but delivered after the polls closed. That order was blocked by a court in June from taking effect, with a judge finding the president lacked the authority to impose such a rule.

The president has long been critical of mail-in voting practices.Paul Martinka

Trump insisted Monday that he does have the authority to tell states how to handle vote counting.

“Remember, the States are merely an ‘agent’ for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do,” he wrote.

The president’s renewed interest in election processes appears to have been triggered by his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday.

“You know, Vladimir Putin said something, one of the most interesting things,” Trump recounted during a post-summit interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

“He said, ‘Your election [in 2020] was rigged because you have mail-in voting.’ He said, ‘Mail-in voting, every election.’ He said, ‘No country has mail-in voting. It’s impossible to have mail-in voting and have honest elections.’”

President Trump’s announcement comes as he looks to the 2026 midterm elections.Paul Martinka

Putin also claimed that if Trump had won re-election in 2020, the war in Ukraine wouldn’t have happened, according to the commander-in-chief.

“ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,” Trump concluded. “I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS.”

https://nypost.com/2025/08/18/us-news/president-trump-to-sign-executive-order-on-2026-election-integrity-targeting-mail-in-ballots-and-voting-machines/

From China: ‘Pregnancy robots’ could give birth to human children in game-changer for infertile couples

 There’s a robot for that.

What a time to be alive — people are marrying AI bots, and now robots might soon be able to carry babies.

Reportedly, China is working on designing a bot with an artificial womb — which will receive nutrients through a hose — in its abdomen that will soon be able to carry a fetus for approximately 10 months before giving birth, according to Chosun Biz.

Pregnant woman in hospital bed experiencing contractions.
This will be a game changer for infertile couples, if all goes according to plan.globalmoments – stock.adobe.com

The “pregnancy robot” was conceptualized by Dr. Zhang Qifeng, founder of Kaiwa Technology, which is based in Guangzhou — a city in China. If all goes according to plan, the prototype will make its debut next year.

For those struggling to conceive, hiring a humanoid to carry their baby will cost 100,000 yuan, $13,927.09 — a price significantly less than a human surrogate, which can cost someone in the US anywhere from $100,000 to $200,000.

“The artificial womb technology is already in a mature stage, and now it needs to be implanted in the robot’s abdomen so that a real person and the robot can interact to achieve pregnancy, allowing the fetus to grow inside,” Qifeng told Chosun Biz.

Many questions are still unanswered at this time, including how the egg and sperm will be fertilized and inserted into the womb and how the bot will give birth.

Model of a fetus in a uterus.
The artificial womb will reportedly receive nutrients through a hose.H_Ko – stock.adobe.com

Obviously, with this sort of technology comes a lot of questions and concerns regarding ethical and legal issues.

“We have held discussion forums with authorities in Guangdong Province and submitted related proposals while discussing policy and legislation,” the doctor said, addressing people’s uneasiness towards this.

Speaking of freaky bots — a humanoid was spotted walking around Fifth Avenue in Midtown Manhattan earlier this month, doing everything from grabbing a hot dog to trying on sneakers.

The intent behind this shocking scene of the KOID-branded bot acting like a human New Yorker was to promote global asset management firm KraneShares’s Global Humanoid and Embodied Intelligence Index ETF, which came out earlier this summer.

“I feel like I was witnessing firsthand . . . the first lightbulb or the first car,” said Joseph Dube, head of marketing at KraneShares. “People were amazed. Some people were terrified. It was a major mixed bag of reactions.”

https://nypost.com/2025/08/17/tech/pregnancy-robots-could-give-birth-to-human-children/