Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 2, 2024

Hamas In London

 by Robert Williams via The Gatestone Institute,

The pro-Hamas protests in London are not, apparently, as organic and spontaneous as their organizers would like them to seem.

At least four groups with links to Hamas are reportedly behind several of the marches: The Muslim Association of Britain (MAB), the Palestinian Forum for Britain, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, and the Friends of al-Aqsa. The same groups were behind the largest protest so far, on November 11 in London, where it is estimated that around 300,000 people participated.

Supporting Hamas, a proscribed terrorist organization in the UK, could lead to up to 14 years in prison.

The MAB was co-founded and directed for almost a decade by Muhammad Kathem Sawalha, who in the late 1980s was a Hamas leader in Samaria in the West Bank, where he reportedly "masterminded" Hamas's terrorist strategy. He fled to the UK in the late 1990s and, incredibly, obtained British citizenship, despite being on Israel's most-wanted list.

The US Department of Justice named Sawalha as a co-conspirator in the 2004 indictment of Hamas recruiter and financer Muhammad Salah, "for allegedly participating in a 15-year racketeering conspiracy in the United States and abroad to illegally finance terrorist activities in Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, including providing money for the purchase of weapons... "

"All three defendants allegedly used bank accounts in the United States to launder millions of dollars for disbursement to support Hamas, which has publicly claimed credit for engaging in suicide bombings that resulted in the deaths of Israeli military personnel and civilians, as well as American and other foreign nationals in Israel and the West Bank."

According to Israeli authorities, his son, Obada Sawalha, is now the MAB's vice-president.

The Muslim Association of Britain has links to the Muslim Brotherhood -- of which Hamas is also an offshoot. A 2015 UK government review of the Muslim Brotherhood reported:

"In the 1990s the Muslim Brotherhood and their associates established public facing and apparently national organisations in the UK to promote their views. None were openly identified with the Muslim Brotherhood and membership of the Muslim Brotherhood remained (and still remains) a secret. But for some years the Muslim Brotherhood shaped the new Islamic Society of Britain (ISB), dominated the Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) and played an important role in establishing and then running the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB). MAB became politically active, notably in connection with Palestine and Iraq, and promoted candidates in national and local elections."

According to the Telegraph:

"Another of the Muslim Association of Britain's three directors, Dr Anas Altikriti, co-founded a group called the British Muslim Initiative with a senior commander in Hamas, Mohammed Sawalha, and Azzam Tamimi who has been described as a Hamas 'special envoy' in Britain."

Another group behind the protest, the Palestinian Forum for Britain, is led by Zaher Birawi, who was designated by Israel as a terrorist in 2013. The Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center described Birawi as a "Hamas-affiliated Palestinian" in 2017, when Birawi was in charge of the so-called flotillas to Gaza, which he oversaw as part of Hamas' propaganda effort.

The Meir Amit Center wrote in 2017:

"Birawi was recently interviewed by Felesteen, Hamas' daily newspaper. He discussed, among other things, the many current difficulties in dispatching flotillas to the Gaza Strip, but tried to minimize their significance and importance. He said the flotillas' main goal is propaganda aimed at keeping the Palestinians, the Gaza Strip and the 'siege' as 'live' topics in international public discourse. According to Birawi, the objectives of the flotillas are to defame Israel, and to increase the effect of the political and media campaigns accompanying the flotillas...

"[T]he real aim of the Mavi Marmara was not to bring humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip, but rather for propaganda and political capital: to demonstrate support for Hamas, to exert pressure on Israel to unilaterally change its policy of closure on the Gaza Strip; to create sympathy in the media for the suffering of the Palestinians resulting from the 'siege' and to deepen Israel's isolation."

Birawi met Ismail Haniyeh and other leaders of the terror group in Gaza in 2012.

The real reason for the Mavi Marmara flotilla, of course -- the reason Israel stopped it -- was not propaganda. Turkey's supposedly humanitarian relief organization, the IHH, turned out to be secretly carrying weapons to Gaza. Israel had first offered the flotilla to dock in the port of Ashdod for inspection. There appear to be propaganda counter-efforts to suppress information about the attempted arms transfer.

Too often, unfortunately, those many propaganda goals evidently correspond to what the organizations behind the never-ending pro-Hamas protests in London -- and around the world -- seek to obtain: Creating sympathy for Hamas and the Gazans, demonizing Israel, which is fighting terrorism for all of us so that we will not have to, and increasing pressure for a permanent ceasefire that will enable Hamas to survive.

Two former leaders of the third group behind the protest, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, reportedly met with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Gaza in 2012.

The fourth group behind the protests, is the Friends of al-Aqsa (FOA). According to the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center:

"Is an anti-Israeli NGO established in Britain in 1997... the FOA qualifies Israel's policy as 'apartheid', supports Hamas and the 'resistance' (i.e., terrorism), and seeks to put an end to Israel's existence as the state of the Jewish people under the title of 'liberation of Palestine'. Similarly to other organizations taking part in the delegitimization effort, the FOA attempts to conceal and play down its real objectives by fine-tuning its rhetoric for Western ears and using such terms as 'peace in Palestine', 'respect for international law', 'respect for human rights, and 'implementation of UN resolutions.'"

FOA's leader, Ismail Patel, has met with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Gaza.

All of the above prompted critics to demand that the protests be cancelled. According to Sky News, half of all Britons wanted the march that took place on Remembrance Day, November 11, to be banned. Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, however, apparently saw no grounds to ban it.

This extremely lax relationship of the British police towards Hamas-affiliated groups in Britain is dangerous to the UK itself.

At the beginning of December, Israel sent personal letters to about 20 European leaders, including the UK, that included evidence of the terrorist activity of Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) in European cities. The letter stated:

"Since the [October 7] massacre, calls for violence against Jews worldwide have increased by 120% - a shocking statistic. Unfortunately, Hamas's bloodlust is not limited to Israel and Jews but also extends to Europe and Christians. I want to remind you that in the past, Hamas members expressed the Islamic intention to conquer Europe..."

Tzur Bar-Oz, Head of the Research and Foreign Relations Division at the Diaspora Affairs Ministry, added in the letter:

"Hamas has been operating for many years worldwide, mainly through covert humanitarian donations. It is a complex network of hatred operating in many countries, including Western and highly democratic ones. This phenomenon must be uprooted and eradicated as soon as possible."

Uprooting Hamas in the UK anytime in the near future, given the lack of enthusiasm that the Met Police have shown in the wake of the pro-Hamas demonstrations, sadly seems unlikely.

"Speeches at pro-Palestinian rallies in the UK might have glorified terrorism" according to the UK government's independent reviewer of terrorism.

UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, to his immense credit, as soon as the pro-Hamas demonstrations began in the UK, said:

"Inciting violence, racial hatred, is illegal. People who are acting in an abusive or threatening manner causing distress are breaking the law. The police have the power and the tools that they need to ensure they can stop that from happening and you will see that in full force in the coming days to make sure anyone who breaks the law meets the full force of that law."

While the Met Police have made some arrests, they have overall allowed the chanting of terrorist slogans to continue at the many weekly protests. On one occasion, police even tried to explain away the meaning of chants of "jihad" that had occurred at one Hizb-ut Tahrir protest:

"The individual has not been arrested with the Met saying the word jihad has 'a number of meanings', and specialist counter-terrorism officers had not identified any offences arising from it. Instead, officers spoke to the man to 'discourage any repeat of similar chanting.'"

In London, it is still appeasement time.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/hamas-london

The growing lunacy of free health insurance for migrants

Across the globe, millions of people are on the move, defying borders and violating laws to escape poor countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America and break into rich countries. 

The United States is their No. 1 destination.

America needs a strategy to control the impact of this lawless migration on our quality of life. 

Instead, the Democratic Party merely virtue signals, saying, “Welcome, take whatever we have.”

As of Jan. 1, California is offering Medi-Cal to 760,000 undocumented migrants of all ages.  

California’s health-care system is already strained, with long emergency-room wait times and a dire nurse shortage. 

A dearth of beds and mental-health facilities prevents municipalities from moving the thousands of drug-addicted homeless off the streets and into treatment. 

The state faces a staggering $68 billion deficit.

Yet the left opts to spend money on migrants instead of on California’s own, showing utter disregard for the health care of local residents.

The California Republican Party warns that adding 760,000 undocumented people to the state’s health insurance rolls will exacerbate “access problems.” 

In short, Californians will wait longer and settle for less care.

Don’t think this lunacy is limited to one state.

New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Illinois, Oregon and Washington already cover migrants in specific age categories, and left-wing lawmakers are pushing to expand the coverage to all ages.

New York lawmakers came close in June but ended the legislative term without passing it.

In blue state after blue state, Democrats are pushing to give migrants taxpayer-funded health coverage.

It’s a knife in the back of hardworking Americans who struggle to pay medical bills.

It will also doom this nation to a never-ending flood of strangers seeking government handouts.

Connecticut’s Democratic-controlled legislature has gone off the deep end, offering “Baby Bonds,” taxpayer-funded savings accounts for every child — including children of illegals — whose birth is covered by the state’s Husky public-insurance program, even if their migrant parents arrived just days before the birth.

Nest eggs courtesy of the taxpayer, for the express purpose of “closing the wealth gap.”

The Democratic Party’s zeal to provide migrants with free health insurance is extreme compared with what’s occurring around the globe, even in socialist-leaning countries.

In June, America was one of only a few First World countries to sign on to the United Nations-sponsored Rabat Declaration, which declares all migrants should have access to a country’s national health-insurance programs.

The Biden administration was in the company of Somalia, Chad, Algeria and other Third World countries.

Notably, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Norway, Sweden and other European countries that receive large numbers of migrants did not sign.

Even socialist countries like Norway are strictly limiting migrants to emergency care only, no comprehensive health insurance. 

French President Emmanuel Macron’s government is reassessing whether it can provide health benefits to migrants.

These countries see what the Democratic Party in the United States refuses to admit: Free health care is a magnet.

Contrary to Vice President Kamala Harris’ blather, the flood of migrants across the southern border is not due to “root causes” the United States can ameliorate with diplomacy and foreign aid.

It’s a worldwide phenomenon.

Many European and Scandinavian countries are adjusting their policies to protect their own residents from undue burdens. 

America is simply surrendering.  

Offering health insurance also invites an influx of sick people from countries that cannot provide care. 

Venezuela’s health-care system has collapsed. Hospitals there lack 80% to 90% of essential medicines, a situation that’s pushing the sick and their families to flee.

Neighboring Brazil is reporting the reappearance of communicable infections such as tuberculosis, hepatitis A, whooping cough, diphtheria and measles because of the influx of Venezuelans needing care.

Expect similar problems in the United States.

Open borders, free meals and hotel rooms and promises of free health coverage produce predictable results.

Migration across the US southern border set yet another record in December.

As one Republican member of Congress commented on California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s health policy, “nothing is free, the California taxpayers have to pay for it.” She added, “It’s treason. No other way to say it.”

At the least, it’s a betrayal. 

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York.

https://nypost.com/2024/01/02/opinion/free-health-care-for-migrants-lunacy-given-us-border-crisis/

Ariz. man shot at 16 times by rival Mexican gangs as GPS took him near dangerous border crossing

 An Arizona man was shot at 16 times when he got caught in the crossfire of warring gangs along the southern border — but he doesn’t have much ill will toward the gunmen who put his life in danger.

Craig Ricketts was wounded when he was shot twice — in the leg and the arm — as he attempted to drive from Mexico to Tempe, Arizona, to visit his son on Christmas Eve, according to a report.

He told Arizona Family he was traveling in northwestern Sasabe — a precarious border route — because of a closure at the Lukeville checkpoint when the shooting started, leading to at least 16 gunshots from smuggling gangs hitting his car.

“The first thing I noticed was my left window was shattered. I saw a bullet hole through my front window, and my radio was blown out with a bullet,” he told the station from his Tucson hospital bed this week.

“I got hit once in my arm, which feels like a bicycle scrape when you’re a kid, and the other is my left leg,” Ricketts also said.

00:0003:55
Craig Ricketts was wounded when he was shot twice as he attempted to drive from Mexico to Tempe, Arizona, to visit his son on Christmas Eve.3TV/CBS 5
Ricketts was traveling in northwestern Sasabe because of a closure at another border crossing when gunfire hailed onto his SUV.3TV/CBS 5
Bullet holes on the side of Ricketts’s car after he got to safety away from the gangs.3TV/CBS 5

The Attorney General’s Office in Sonora said the shooting was the second time an American was caught in the middle of violence in the last month, the outlet reported.

Ricketts initially wanted to get around the closed Lukeville checkpoint by crossing the border at Nogales, but his GPS reportedly led him toward the Sasabe entry point in Sonora where the Department of State advises Americans to avoid the area because of crime.

The Christmas Eve shooting comes a week after a US resident was killed and two other people were wounded in a shooting along a Sonora highway, the Arizona Republic reported.

Ricketts works in Puerto Libertad, Sonora, building a real estate development and has worked in Mexico for 20 years, Arizona Family reported.

Ricketts wanted to get around the closed Lukeville checkpoint by crossing the border at Nogales, but his GPS reportedly led him toward the Sasabe entry point3TV/CBS 5
Ricketts shows off one of the two gunshot wounds he suffered on Christmas Eve.3TV/CBS 5
Despite the scary episode, Ricketts apparently wasn’t angered by the gangs that fired the hail of bullets, according to the station.

“The bottom line is they don’t know who I am,” he said. “They just wanted to secure their access for smuggling people.”

https://nypost.com/2024/01/02/news/arizona-man-craig-ricketts-shot-at-16-times-by-rival-mexican-gangs-near-border/