Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

Burn Notice: Russia Hoax Secrets Found in FBI Burn Bags

 


They didn’t just bury the truth. They sealed it in burn bags and locked it away inside FBI headquarters—marked for destruction before detection. But one man asked the right questions, found the right room, and uncovered the evidence before it went up in smoke.

That’s right. The most consequential political scandal of a generation—the Russia Hoax—consumed the Democrat party, Never Trumpers, and the legacy media. Its narrative became a creed for the political left, even after it was debunked and discredited.

Yet it lingers still, a scaffold upon which they project their hatred of all things Trump. And now we know: evidence that could unravel their narrative wasn’t just buried—it was bagged for destruction at FBI headquarters.

Draw your own conclusions. The picture paints itself.

For years, the question wasn’t just what they knew, but what they hid. Now we have the answer—more damning than imagined.

In three earlier articles, I exposed how the Obama administration manipulated assessments, sidelined dissenting analysts, and buried the Clinton campaign’s ties to Russian disinformation beneath layers of narrative management.

The last chapter traced the final bureaucratic deception that culminated in the January 6th intelligence report—how the doctored ICA, the suppression of Clinton-linked intel, and the media’s willing complicity helped cement a false consensus that never matched the underlying intelligence.

But this brings us to the darker sequel: physical concealment and premeditated destruction.

We’ve seen something like this before—think Enron, except this time it’s not corporate auditors under fire, but the previous senior leadership of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and beyond.

The Obama-era coup against Donald Trump didn’t begin with Crossfire Hurricane, and it certainly didn’t end with the Mueller Report—or even with the last burn bag recovered.

Who knows if it has ended or if it ever will? With each passing day, new documents surface. Each one damning. And those desperate to bury the scandal only dig themselves deeper.

Analysis of the burn bag documents begins with a record certain officials likely prayed would stay buried: the so-called “Durham annex.”

Omitted from the public version of Special Counsel John Durham’s report, it wasn’t excluded due to irrelevance—but because it didn’t address misconduct during the investigation.

Instead, it exposed the intelligence abuses that triggered the investigation itself. Until recently, it remained classified.

As FBI Director Kash Patel posted on X, his team uncovered a hidden room of previously unseen documents—including a classified Durham annex from the Trump–Russia probe—and initiated a coordinated declassification review with other intelligence leaders.

In Patel’s own words: “We just uncovered burn bags/room filled with Russiagate files, including the Durham annex, and declassified them. Once again, I released the prior FBI’s own documents and exposed the truth.”

On July 31, 2025, the annex Patel uncovered was officially declassified and released by Senator Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

While redacted in parts, it confirms the intelligence community possessed credible foreign intelligence raising red flags about the Clinton campaign's involvement in fueling the Trump–Russia disinformation narrative.

It further documents that this intelligence was seen by top officials—including those who drafted and approved the January 2017 ICA—but withheld from its conclusions.

Even a cursory review of the Durham annex reveals explosive new information—evidence that helps stitch together the real collusion behind the Russia hoax.

And it wasn’t Trump and Moscow. It was the Clinton campaign, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, operatives from George Soros’ network, and political actors embedded within the intelligence community and the FBI—all under the watchful eyes of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

The implications of Patel’s discovery and Grassley’s declassification are staggering—but they barely scratch the surface of what the annex actually reveals.

That story—the memos, the names, and the strategy they buried—deserves its own reckoning. And it’s coming next.

But first, did the concealment and intended destruction of these records violate federal law? Here’s a quick digest:

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2071 – Concealment or destruction of federal records
    • This statute makes it a crime to remove, destroy, or hide federal records deliberately. That includes anything from official memos to internal investigative documents. A conviction can carry up to three years in prison, and—critically—can bar the offender from holding public office.
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1519 – Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations
    • Applies to anyone who “knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record… with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States.”
    • Penalty: up to 20 years in prison.
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before Congress or federal agencies
    • Covers efforts to influence, obstruct, or impede proceedings before departments, agencies, or Congress, using threats, force, intimidation, or corrupt persuasion, with knowledge of a pending proceeding or a foreseeable agency action.
    • In this case, if senior officials knew these materials were responsive to congressional or DOJ inquiries—and ordered them placed into destruction queues anyway—then “corrupt persuasion” under the statute could apply. Concealing or routing those records for destruction, outside the normal redaction or archival procedures, may constitute a deliberate attempt to obstruct lawful oversight or pending investigations.
    • Penalty: up to 5 years in prison.
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1924 – Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents
    • Criminalizes improper retention of classified documents by government officials, including knowingly removing such materials without authority and failing to return them to proper custody. This is a highly fact-specific analysis that could result in successful criminal prosecution if the elements of the crime are met.
    • Penalty: up to 5 years in prison.
  • 18 U.S.C. § 793(f)–(g) – Espionage Act: gross negligence and conspiracy involving national defense information
    • Penalizes grossly negligent handling of national defense-related classified materials, including failure to report their loss or destruction.
    • Covers conspiracies to commit any such offense.
    • Penalty: up to 10 years in prison.

The Russia hoax was the most elaborate disinformation campaign ever unleashed on American soil—not by a foreign adversary, but by our security-intelligence apparatus, acting under the direction of the Executive Branch to target the Republican nominee who would go on to become president.

These documents weren’t just misfiled or overlooked—they were queued for destruction and placed in burn bags. Marked for disappearance and discovered only by chance, and only because someone refused to stop digging.

In a functioning republic, someone should be indicted. And maybe—eventually—someone will be. But even now, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

The truth has finally been declassified. But the damage was done long before: a presidency sabotaged, intelligence corrupted, and public trust in government left in ashes.

This wasn’t just a coup. It was a cover-up stuffed in a burn bag—and they nearly struck the match.

It confirms what Donald Trump saw all along: the fire behind the smoke. And now, the rest of us can see it too.

Stay tuned.

Charlton Allen is an attorney and former chief executive officer and chief judicial officer of the North Carolina Industrial Commission. He is founder of the Madison Center for Law & Liberty, Inc., editor of The American Salient, and host of the Modern Federalist podcast. His commentary has been featured in American Thinker and linked across multiple RealClear platforms, including RealClearPoliticsRealClearWorldRealClearDefenseRealClearHistory, and RealClearPolicy. X: @CharltonAllenNC

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/08/burn_notice_russia_hoax_secrets_found_in_fbi_burn_bags.html

Lawfare soars to crazed leftist heights in Brazil and Colombia

 


Had the American people not rallied around President Trump as odious phony prosecutions engulfed him during his presidential campaign, he may not have been re-elected president and instead endured a terrible fate.

In South America this week, we are seeing how bad it could have been.

Late yesterday, Brazil's manic, freakish, version of Judge James Boasberg, Justice Alexandre de Moraes, ordered Brazil's equivalent of President Trump, former President Jair Bolsonaro arrested for questioning the 2022 Brazilian presidential electoral result, that, as with President Trump, he was mysteriously defeated in by a narrow margin after showing significant strength on the campaign trail.

According to Reuters:

SAO PAULO, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Brazil's Supreme Court was caught off-guard by Justice Alexandre de Moraes' decision late on Monday to place former President Jair Bolsonaro under house arrest, two sources at the court told Reuters on Tuesday.
 
The order underscores Moraes' readiness to act on his own despite both polarization among Brazilians on the issue and rising tensions with the White House. It came just days ahead of the introduction of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods entering the United States.

Moaes didn't care that a tariffs deal with the U.S. was predicated on fair treatment of Bolsonaro, which is bound to affect Brazil's economy negatively. He doesn't care about Brazil at all. He is a man possessed, like the lawfare artists in the U.S., with Bolsonaro Derangement Syndrome.

Bolsonaro had been elected by a huge majority in his first term after the excesses, corruptions, and failures of the left, a long miserable period that culminated in the green swimming pools at the 2016 Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. He challenged Brazil's deep state, made Brazil an economic powerhouse again, and earned the raging enmity of the left. Now, no good deed goes unpunished. 

This could have been us, had President Trump not prevailed in court from a similar cabal of politically connected lawfare prosecutors, each more creative than the next at bringing a slew of ham-sandwich indictments against President Trump, all at once and all coming right after he decided to run for re-election. One wonders if Bolsonaro can ever come back from this lawfare trap from an ambitious and woke judge, raising questions as to whether change is ever possible in Brazil or the Brazilian people will find a way to rise up. President Trump's support for Bolsonaro has got to be a helpful line out to that deep-state choked country. But the outcome is unknown, the only sure thing is the malevolence of Bolsonaro's enemies.

It's not the only place where lawfare lunacy reigns -- last week, the nightmare was in Colombia, where former President Alvaro Uribe was convicted of a ginned-up bribery charge and sentenced to 12 years of house arrest.

According to the New York Times:

Álvaro Uribe, Colombia’s conservative former president who shaped the country’s politics more than anyone over the past 25 years, was found guilty on Monday of bribery in criminal proceedings and procedural fraud. It was the first major criminal conviction of a former Colombian leader.

Mr. Uribe was accused of working with a lawyer in an unsuccessful effort to bribe a former paramilitary to retract testimony that damaged him. The paramilitary had said that Mr. Uribe, 73, founded and financed a paramilitary group in the 1990s, during the country’s long and bloody internal conflict.

The ruling, by Judge Sandra Heredia of a lower circuit court in Bogotá, is likely to further divide the nation, which has long debated the legacy of Mr. Uribe’s role in the conflict. As president from 2002 to 2010 he pursued an aggressive military campaign against the country’s leftist rebel groups, significantly weakening the largest group and bringing a measure of security the nation had not seen in years.

Uribe, recall, transformed his country from a guerrilla-infested Marxist cocaine hellhole into one of Latin America's safest, cleanest and fastest growing countries. Incomes rose. Crime fell. Illegal immigration to the U.S. dropped almost to zero in those Uribe years, and Colombia ended up with an illegal alien problem of its own from Venezuela, a nation that its nationals historically went to legally or illegally to find work. Uribe transformed Colombia, made it a major non-NATO ally of the U.S. and OECD member, giving it a great sense of pride.

Oh, and there were the rescues, the spectacular hostage rescues and guerrilla rubouts that exposed the evils of Hugo Chavez's Venezuelan regime and freed hostages, including three Americans who been held for years in monstrous jungle conditions. Colombia's army became a serious army under Uribe.   

The sudden concern with 'bribery' as they called it, was pure kangaroo court stuff in light of the Odebrecht scandal and other scandals. That it happened against Uribe was pure lawfare, and ironic, because Colombia is a nation that prides itself on its legal tradition -- which unfortunately has gotten too big for its britches since the election of radical leftwing President Gustavo Petro, who, like Brazil's President Luiz Inacio 'Lula' da Silva's closest associates, is a former leftwing guerrilla.

Uribe's case is very sad and must be cause to him for ruefulness. He has always been an implacable foe of the left, once stating to, I think it was Mary O'Grady at the Wall Street Journal, that he didn't believe in the political pendulum theory -- he wanted the left crushed. He understood that it was because it wasn't democratic the way normal political tendencies are, it would always kill you if you didn't kill it first. The left was not like the right and there was no continuum.

During the early Obama years, Uribe, who was insanely popular in Colombia, was offered the choice to end term limits and run for a third term, which, during the time when Colombia was seeking free trade with the U.S., Uribe, with great hesitation, went along with.

To zero surprise for him, the left acted exactly the way he thought they would, coming after him the way he went after their heroes, stated or not, the leftist FARC guerrillas, and they never forgave him.

Uribe remained immensely popular yet his conservative successors have been weak, the last one losing out to the odious Petro, a drug addict, former terrorist whose M-19 guerrilla group literally burned down Colombia's Supreme Court with many of the justices in it in the 1980s, and gushy friend of Hugo Chavez. 

Uribe, too, was very Trump-like in his days, a proto-Trump, actually, with the slightly gruff focus and amiability of Ronald Reagan. Of course they came to get him, giggling judges, dancing guerrillas, all they needed were a few flames to dance around in to make the picture perfect.

The attack on Uribe and the attack on Bolsonaro are typical nonsense seen in Latin America which often chases its ex-presidents out of th country. But it also was clearly an ugly outgrowth of the lawfare attacks on Trump. Monkey see, monkey do.

It shows how bad it could have been for President Trump and what a bullet we dodged on the day he got elected. I won't cross my fingers, but let's hope South America has a similar outcome.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/08/lawfare_soars_to_crazed_leftist_heights_in_brazil_and_colombia.html

Revolution Medicines update

 

  • Strong execution of two ongoing Phase 3 trials of daraxonrasib; for RASolute 302, company is winding down enrollment in U.S. and expects to complete enrollment of the trial this year

  • FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designations granted for two RAS(ON) inhibitors, daraxonrasib and elironrasib

  • Company entered into $2 billion flexible funding agreement with Royalty Pharma to support bold vision for global development and commercialization

Cash Position: Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $2.1 billion as of June 30, 2025. This balance includes receipt of the first $250 million royalty monetization tranche from Royalty Pharma.

R&D Expenses: Research and development expenses were $224.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to $134.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The increase in expenses was primarily due to increases in clinical trial expenses and manufacturing expenses for daraxonrasib, zoldonrasib and elironrasib, and personnel-related expenses and stock-based compensation expense related to additional headcount.

G&A Expenses: General and administrative expenses were $40.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to $21.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to increases in personnel-related expenses and stock-based compensation expense associated with additional headcount, and an increase in commercial preparation activities.

Net Loss: Net loss was $247.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to net loss of $133.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2024.

Financial Guidance
Revolution Medicines is projecting full year 2025 GAAP net loss guidance of between $1.03 billion and $1.09 billion, which includes estimated non-cash stock-based compensation expense of between $115 million and $130 million.

Webcast
Revolution Medicines will host a webcast this afternoon, August 6, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time (1:30 p.m. Pacific Time). To listen to the live webcast, or access the archived webcast, please visit: https://ir.revmed.com/events-and-presentations. Following the live webcast, a replay will be available on the company’s website for at least 14 days.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/revolution-medicines-reports-second-quarter-200200955.html

The Linguistic Kill-Switch: Inside The Modern Propaganda Playbook

 by Nick Giambruno via The Epoch Times,

The next time someone sneers “conspiracy theorist,” “anti-vaxxer,” “climate denier,” “far right,” “hate speech,” “terrorist,” or the ever-popular “racist,” understand what they are really saying: stop thinking.

These words are a linguistic kill-switch—engineered to short-circuit thought by triggering a reflexive emotional spasm.

If you encounter someone using these words, you can be certain you are not dealing with someone interested in a good faith effort to find the truth.

These terms are precision-guided psychological weapons, fired by unseen hands to herd the public mind. Recall the CIA’s own 1967 memo coining “conspiracy theorist” expressly to silence anyone doubting the magic-bullet fairy tale that supposedly killed JFK.

Although they are a poor substitute for an actual argument, these propaganda terms unfortunately work on many people. Call someone one of these words and you no longer need to refute their ideas with facts, logic, or reason. The slur does the work like magic.

Take the granddaddy of all elastic scare-labels: terrorism.

One hundred years ago the word barely existed. Today it vaporizes civil liberties on contact.

Glenn Greenwald nailed it: the T-word is “simultaneously the single most meaningless and most manipulated word in the American political lexicon.”

The only difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist is who controls the narrative.

Greenwald elaborates:

“There is this common paradox which is that the words that are most frequently used and have the greatest impact are often the words that are the most ill-defined. And therefore subject to manipulation, deceit, and propaganda.

So the word ‘terrorist’ for example is something that pervades countless political discussions of great significance. And we are essentially at the point, literally, where if the government points to somebody and simply utters the word ‘terrorist,’ and large numbers of citizens… will cheer for whatever it is that is done… No matter how lawless, no matter how little evidence has been presented to justify it, the mere fact that they have been labeled a ‘terrorist’ is something that will basically cause a majority of people to sanction whatever is done.

And yet what is so fascinating about the word ‘terrorist’ is that it really is a term that has absolutely no fixed meaning, it’s simply a term that means whatever the person wielding it wants it to mean.”

Greenwald continues:

“Because the word terrorism is so potent and shuts down all debate, the mere application of that label by the government, anonymously and with no evidence… has made huge numbers of people stand up and cheer the most radical power a government can seize, which is the power to target one’s own citizens for death, for assassination, in total secrecy and with no due process.

And that to me really illustrates the potency of how these propagandistic terms are wielded….

If we’re really going to vest virtually unlimited power in the government to do anything it wants to people they call ‘terrorists,’ we ought at least to have a common understanding of what the term means. But there is none. It’s just become a malleable, all-justifying term to allow the US government carte blanche to do whatever it wants.

‘Terrorism’ is really more of a hypnotic mantra than an actual word.”

In short, say the magic T-word and—poof—your rights, your property, your life evaporate, all without trial, all to thunderous applause.

The Antidote

Using these words is almost like casting a spell—most people who hear them become hypnotized, immediately stop thinking, and turn into easily herded automatons.

Fortunately, the counter-spell is simple: demand consistent and logical definitions. Make them spell out exactly what they mean by “terrorist,” or “science denier.” Watch their argument collapse into ad hominem attacks, straw men arguments, appeals to emotion, and crocodile tears. And if that all fails they will play the “racist” card.

That’s the playbook.

In short, when sophistry is all they have, facts become kryptonite.

The propaganda spell breaks the moment you refuse to flinch at the linguistic kill-switch.

The good news is that it’s a fragile method of control; people can snap out of their hypnosis. And once they do, they never go back. It’s like pulling back the curtain to see the Wizard of Oz and still being intimidated by him… that just doesn’t happen.

So never stop asking questions and thinking critically.

Don’t be intimidated by cowards, intellectual midgets, charlatans, and petty tyrants who use propaganda words to get you to shut up and stop thinking.

And when they reach for the next emotionally-charged empty label, smile and say:

“Is that all you’ve got?”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/linguistic-kill-switch-inside-modern-propaganda-playbook

Ghislaine Maxwell Reportedly Cleared Trump's Name In DOJ Interview

 by Ken Silva via Headline USA,

Convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly told the Justice Department in a recent interview that she never observed President Donald Trump doing anything around her that “caused concern.”

Maxwell was recently interviewed by the DOJ about roughly 100 people who were associated with her and her accomplice, deceased pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

“Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump,” ABC reported, citing anonymous sources.

“There is also an audio recording of the interview, the sources said, but it’s not clear whether the administration plans to release the audio to accompany any public release of the transcript,” the outlet added.

“The public release of the transcripts could come as soon as this week.”

Maxwell was moved from federal prison in Florida to a cushier, lower-security camp in Texas after her DOJ interview.

Maxwell was previously housed in the “honor dorm” of a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida.

“Maxwell’s cushy new digs in D South – the so-called ‘honor dorm’ – are reserved for 30 to 40 of the low-security Florida lockup’s best-behaved prisoners,” the Daily Mail reported in March 2024.

She has an appeal pending before the Supreme Court, and rumors are swirling that President Donald Trump may pardon her in exchange for information about his political enemies.

A potential pardon would give Maxwell every incentive to clear Trump’s name - which is what she did, according to a Wednesday report from ABC News.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ghislaine-maxwell-reportedly-cleared-trumps-name-doj-interview

Dark Side Of Big Solar Exposed As The Fight To Save Farmland Heats Up

 This is precious farmland. 

Now this is precious farmland bulldozed in the name of the so-called "green" energy movement - all to fight a 'climate crisis' that exists more in the headlines of leftist corporate propaganda media outlets than in the actual world. 

Remember this...

Citizens around the world have been spoon-fed doomsday climate propaganda for decades - and warned of an impending climate apocalypse that never arrives. Yet every year, climate taxes increase and energy costs soar, as well as power grid reliability crumbles. Why? Because climate alarmist progressives have hijacked energy policy, pushing reckless green agendas that are now backfiring.

Spain's blackout a few months ago provided a glimpse into what it truly means to be 'net zero' for a day...

Now, households and businesses across the U.S. Mid-Atlantic are feeling the pain as their power bills skyrocket, courtesy of Democrat-led green energy delusion... 

Since 2015, global solar installations have outpaced all fossil fuels combined. In 2024, the U.S. solar sector grew significantly, and public support for solar is at an all-time high.

Yet there's a dark side to solar. We already know it's an unreliable form of power generation, but did you know one of its major drawbacks is the massive land requirement? 

Solar projects are now surpassing 200 megawatts in size, and to support them, companies are gobbling up vast swaths of precious farmland. This land grab has ignited the early stages of a global revolt. 

"From Spain to Texas and India to England, solar projects are encroaching on prime agricultural land. Farmers and ranchers are fighting back," energy expert Robert Bryce explained in a new short-form documentary titled "SUNBLOCK: The Global Fight To Save Farmland From Big Solar."

Bryce highlighted the glaring inefficiency of the green energy push: a 270-megawatt solar plant in Texas that consumes 2,300 acres of farmland, while a 1,200-megawatt natural gas facility down the road delivers 88 times more power on just 26 acres... So for the "efficiency" of the green revolution...

Bryce pointed out - and we agree - that the most efficient forms of power for fueling AI data centers and other emerging electrification trends are nuclear and natural gas. Solar may work well on the rooftops of homes or businesses, but as the energy expert warned, its dark side lies in the massive land grab of valuable farmland.

Is there a secret agenda behind the destruction of farmland for sprawling fields of unreliable solar panels? It's time to reevaluate the solar agenda - and hold leftist lawmakers accountable in elections, from city halls to Capitol Hill, for pushing climate crisis propaganda that's devouring our farmland in pursuit of a utopian green fantasy that will never materialize (well, it will with nuclear).

Must Watch:

. . . 

https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/dark-side-big-solar-exposed-fight-save-farmland-heats

Lies, Damned Lies, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics

 by John Hinderaker

When President Trump fired the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika McEntarfer, most people considered it an instance of Trump’s petulance. This is how Trump himself explained it:



In 2024, it was believed by many people–including me–that the BLS was trying to help first Joe Biden, then Kamala Harris, by releasing good jobs numbers, which would get a lot of publicity, and then quietly revising them downward when the next month’s numbers–again positive, but wrong–came out. If that was deliberate, it was a reprehensible practice.

But what is happening now is the same thing, only more so: an excellent jobs report, followed by a downgrade. Stephen Moore puts it in graph form that is easy to understand:



If BLS was trying to help President Biden, it is really trying to help President Trump. I think the more likely explanation is incompetence. We have never seen anything like the massive mis-estimates of recent months. Either the BLS has gotten terrible at its job, or it should delay its jobs estimates until they can be made more reliably. So, while Trump’s rationale for firing Dr. McEntarfer was flawed, it is no stretch to say that BLS needs new leadership.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/08/lies-damned-lies-and-the-bureau-of-labor-statistics.php