Search This Blog

Friday, February 6, 2026

China’s Spy-Cam Porn Industry Exposed

 China’s long-running problem with so-called “spy-cam porn” has resurfaced in stark detail after a BBC World Service investigation revealed how hidden cameras in hotel rooms continue to capture and sell guests’ most intimate moments to thousands of online viewers.

Filmed Without Consent

The BBC reported that one victim, identified as Eric, discovered that a hotel stay he shared with his girlfriend in Shenzhen in 2023 had been secretly recorded and uploaded to a pornographic channel. The footage showed the couple entering the room, setting down their bags and later having sex — all without their knowledge.

Eric, who had previously consumed secretly filmed pornography, realised he had become part of the same supply chain he once watched. When he informed his girlfriend, Emily, she initially thought it was a joke. After seeing the footage herself, she became deeply distressed, fearing it may have been viewed by colleagues or family members. The couple stopped speaking for weeks.

A Growing Underground Industry

According to the BBC, so-called spy-cam pornography has existed in China for at least a decade, despite strict laws banning the production and distribution of porn. In recent years, awareness has grown on Chinese social media, with users — particularly women — sharing tips on how to detect cameras and, in extreme cases, setting up tents inside hotel rooms for privacy.

In April last year, Chinese authorities introduced new regulations requiring hotels to conduct regular inspections for hidden cameras. However, the BBC found that the practice remains widespread.

Hundreds of Cameras, Thousands of Victims

The BBC investigation identified six websites and apps promoted primarily through Telegram, a platform banned in China but widely used for illicit activity. Together, these platforms claimed to operate more than 180 hidden cameras in hotel rooms, many of which livestreamed guests’ activities.

Monitoring one platform for seven months, the BBC found footage from 54 different cameras, with around half active at any given time. Based on typical hotel occupancy rates, the BBC estimates that thousands of guests may have been filmed during that period alone, most without ever knowing.

Inside the Supply Chain: AKA and the “Camera Owners”

One of the most prominent agents identified by the BBC was known as “AKA.” Posing as a consumer, the BBC paid a monthly subscription of 450 yuan ($65) to access a livestreaming website promoted by AKA.

Subscribers could choose between multiple live feeds showing different hotel rooms, rewind footage from the moment guests activated the electricity, and download archived clips. On Telegram, AKA managed channels with up to 10,000 members, while his video archive contained more than 6,000 clips dating back to 2017.

According to the BBC, AKA and similar agents appeared to work on behalf of higher-level figures referred to as “camera owners,” who arranged installations and controlled the livestreaming platforms. During one exchange, AKA accidentally shared a message from an alleged camera owner known as “Brother Chun,” before deleting it.

Watch: The moment the BBC finds a spy-cam hidden in a hotel room

Tracing a Camera to a Hotel Room

BBC researchers were able to trace one hidden camera to a hotel room in Zhengzhou, central China, by piecing together clues from subscribers, online posts and on-the-ground investigation. The camera was found hidden inside a wall ventilation unit, wired directly into the building’s electricity supply and aimed at the bed.

A commercially available hidden-camera detector failed to identify the device. After the camera was disabled, subscribers quickly noticed its disappearance.

“Zhonghua got taken down,” one user wrote on Telegram. AKA replied that it was “a shame,” praising the room’s sound quality. Within hours, he announced that a replacement camera in another hotel had gone live.

Profits and Weak Enforcement

Based on subscription fees and channel membership, the BBC estimates that AKA alone earned at least 163,200 yuan ($22,000) in under a year — several times China’s average annual income, which stood at 43,377 yuan last year.

Despite strict rules governing surveillance devices, the BBC found it was relatively easy to purchase spy cameras at major electronics markets. Legal cases related to spy-cam pornography were found across China, though detailed court data has become harder to access in recent years.

Platforms Under Scrutiny

Advocacy groups cited by the BBC say removing non-consensual footage remains extremely difficult. Telegram, they say, rarely responds to takedown requests, forcing victims to appeal directly to group administrators.

After being contacted by the BBC, Telegram said sharing non-consensual pornography violates its terms and that it removes millions of harmful posts daily. However, the livestreaming website accessed by the BBC remained operational.

Lasting Trauma

Eric and Emily remain traumatised by the experience, the BBC reported. They avoid hotels, wear hats in public to avoid recognition and live with the fear that the footage could resurface online.

The BBC’s investigation concludes that while regulations and awareness have increased, China’s spy-cam porn industry continues to exploit enforcement gaps, technology platforms and unsuspecting victims on a massive scale.

https://clashreport.com/world/articles/chinas-spy-cam-porn-industry-exposed-bjy3v930vbh

Sources:

Rashida Tlaib's Terror Ties Under Scrutiny In New Watchdog Report

 A damning new report from ISGAP Action has thrust Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) back into the spotlight, this time with allegations that extend beyond rhetoric and directly involve national security. 

U.S. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib outside the Capitol Building in Washington DC. on Oct. 18, 2023.Celal Gunes / Anadolu via Getty Images

The nonpartisan group released findings that detail what it describes as a disturbing and recurring pattern of connections between the “Squad” member and individuals and organizations tied to designated terrorist groups, including Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. 

“As a sitting member of the United States Congress, Tlaib’s repeated engagement with figures who promote or excuse terrorism and antisemitic ideology presents a challenge to the integrity of democratic institutions, congressional ethics, and national security,” the report’s executive summary states. 

The report raises serious questions about whether her presence in Congress poses a risk to national security and whether she has crossed a line that should trigger expulsion. 

She has previously faced formal censure efforts in the House twice. In November 2023, she was censured for promoting false narratives about the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks and using rhetoric widely viewed as antisemitic. The resolution cited her defense of Hamas as justified resistance within 24 hours of the attack, the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust, as well as her spreading a false claim that Israel bombed the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital despite contrary U.S. and Israeli intelligence assessments. 

A second censure resolution was introduced in September 2025 after her appearance at the People’s Conference for Palestine, where she was accused of promoting and cheering on terrorism and antisemitism.

But her rhetoric isn’t the only red flag. Between 2020 and 2025, Tlaib's campaign and leadership PAC funneled nearly $600,000 to Unbought Power, a consulting firm run by Rasha Mubarak. Mubarak previously worked with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2009 Holy Land Foundation terror financing trial. She also held roles with the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights and Alliance for Global Justice, both of which have faced scrutiny for their ties to Hamas and PFLP-aligned networks. The payments, earmarked for fundraising consulting, were documented in Federal Election Commission filings and have drawn sharp criticism.

The ISGAP report also highlights Tlaib's participation in events featuring known extremists. “For instance, Tlaib has shared the stage with Wisam Rafeedie, a convicted PFLP operative, and spoken at events where banners of Samidoun (a group designated as a terror proxy by the U.S. government) were prominently displayed,” the report explains. “Her comments at these events have included the glorification of ‘martyrs’ and calls for continued resistance, aligning her rhetoric with the ideological framework of jihadist organizations.

The PFLP has a long and brutal history. In August 2019, a PFLP cell detonated an explosive device that killed 17-year-old Israeli Rina Shnerb and seriously injured her father and brother at a natural spring near the Dolev settlement in the West Bank. Israel arrested 50 PFLP members in the aftermath, seizing guns and bomb-making equipment. The attack was led by Samer Mina Salim Arbid, who personally triggered the bomb remotely. 

Currently, there is no evidence that Tlaib has violated 18 U.S. Code §2339B, the federal statute that criminalizes providing material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations. However, according to ISGAP Action, “certain patterns of engagement—such as appearing alongside individuals linked to such groups or echoing their rhetoric—raise serious ethical and national security concerns.”

Based on the current evidence, protected political speech and congressional immunity make legal action unlikely, but ISGAP Action argues that “the consistency and context of these associations may warrant further public scrutiny and oversight by congressional bodies.”

Despite the mounting evidence of ties to terror-linked individuals and organizations, no member of Congress has moved to expel her from the House of Representatives. However, Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas) seems to believe action is absolutely necessary.

It is unlikely that action will be taken. Nevertheless, the report makes clear that Tlaib's conduct demonstrates how extremist ideologies can infiltrate mainstream democratic institutions, even the U.S. Congress.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rashida-tlaibs-terror-ties-under-scrutiny-new-watchdog-report

Bessent Says Iranian Leaders Wiring Money Out Of Country 'Like Crazy'

 Lest anyone still entertain the idea that Washington conducts military interventions abroad for the sake of "democracy" or because it "stands with the people" or for "human rights" - we bring you Thursday's testimony of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent before the Senate Banking Committee...

Bessent boasts, not for the first time, that it was actually crippling US sanctions which in large part fueled the January mass protests and riots which left thousands dead, also following intense clashes with police, and in some cases attacks on security services and the burning of buildings.

This isn't actually the first time the Treasury Secretary was this blunt and revealing about the aim of US sanctions and regime change.

In March 2025, he spoke to the New York Economic Club and said the goal is "Making Iran Broke Again". "Watch this space," he said at the time. "If economic security is national security, the regime in Tehran will have neither."

US sanctions are all about applying enough pain and suffering on the common populace in order to foment destabilization. Interestingly, Bessent has further claimed that Iranian leaders are moving money out of the country "like crazy" in a signal which could spell "the end may be near" for current Iranian rulers.

He went on in the Thursday Senate presentation to the declare "the rats are leaving the ship" in Iran, pointing to what he described as accelerating capital flight among the country's leadership.

The geopolitical and miliary fronts have seen setback after setback for Iran as well:

  • Israel has carried out assassinations of top Iranian nuclear scientists, as well as helped plan the US assassination of IRGC Commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020. 
  • Over the past two years, it has also assassinated the leadership of anti-Israel groups funded by Iran in the region, including Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen. 
  • In June, a 12-day war began with Israeli strikes on Iran that killed between 1,060 and 1,190 Iranians. This constant scenario of being under political and military siege pushes Iran into cycles that dig its economic hole deeper.

Trump is keeping up his maximum pressure campaign, and has been able to get Tehran to the table, but there's still an uphill battle if the two sides hope to forge a new agreement.

The above Rubio speech outlines where things stand from Washington's perspective, and so a new US strike on the Islamic Republic in the near future seems likely at this point.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/bessent-says-iranian-leaders-wiring-money-out-country-crazy

Not to worry—Trump did not post a racist video about the Obamas

 by Andrea Widburg

Yesterday, Donald Trump posted an interesting video on his social media about voting machine election fraud in 2020. This is obviously a topic dear to his heart. Moreover, as the investigations in Fulton County, Georgia, demonstrate, it’s still a very hot and important topic (making it all the more bizarre that Senate Republicans will not push the SAVE Act, which aligns with the bipartisan public desire for election integrity). That Trump would post such a video is a no-brainer.

The problem with the video Trump posted is that it’s a dead certainty that he reposted it without bothering to watch the whole thing. Had he watched it to the end, he would have known that there was a problem.

You see, the video is a screen recording captured by an unknown third party. And what the unknown third party was also clearly unaware of (or, possibly, didn’t care about) was the automated beginning of another, entirely unrelated video.

So, what you get after 58 seconds of a serious video about a serious topic is two seconds of an automatically played video showing Michelle and Barack Obama’s heads attached to the cartoon bodies of simian creatures. (Apes? Chimps? I have no idea.) You can see for yourself what happened:

As I can attest from my slow learning curve in making video-podcasts, failing to clip the end of a screen recording is a classic amateur mistake. That means it’s entirely possible that the person who recorded the serious election fraud video, like Trump himself, had turned his attention away in the last few seconds, because the real point was in the main body of the video. You didn’t need to watch it to the end to get the gist of it.

But of course, in politics, optics are everything, and Trump, clearly inadvertently, gave leftists the optics they needed. We know this because, when Democrats took the matter to the media and social media, they didn’t use the entire video. They couldn’t because it would have reminded voters that they were almost certainly the victims of a fraudulent election in 2020.

Instead, the Democrats got a screen grab of those and pretended that the entire video that Trump shared consisted of showing the Obamas as simian creatures.  Here are just some examples of this fake “frozen moment in time” approach:

 

Even those who opted for a video approach to castigating Trump carefully ensured that the video was only of the Obamas, without any hint of the election fraud that preceded it. Frankly, I’m not sure it was a good idea because the subconscious is going to walk away with a very powerful impression, not of Trump doing a bad thing, but of Michelle and Barack bouncing in the jungle:

The long-term problem here is that the left will get away with this one. It’s a classic case of “a lie can travel halfway around the world before the truth gets its pants on.” They have a powerful image that’s sort of true, and we have a long explanation about Trump being unaware of an autoplay video popping up at the end of a more serious video about election fraud. In a short-attention span world, we lose.

Still, it’s up to every one of us to counter what happened—perhaps by sharing the entire video with people who are confused. Who knows? They might learn something.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/02/not_to_worry_trump_did_not_post_a_racist_video_about_the_obamas.html

Newsom’s Failures Exposed in California Gubernatorial Debate

 About an hour and 44 minutes into this week’s debate among seven candidates for governor of California, the moderator asked a question that he said had been sent in by "Henry in San Bernardino." It said, "Governor Newsom made several high-profile commitments, such as addressing housing affordability, reducing homelessness, and improving public safety that some Californians feel remain unmet or insufficiently delivered. What concrete accountability mechanisms would you put in place to ensure that your own commitments are not just announced but measurably delivered within a defined timeline?"

The question underscored an awkward reality for the six Democrats on stage and for the party as a whole. The Golden State governor, Gavin Newsom, is near the top of polls for the 2028 presidential nomination. He has an autobiography, Young Man in a Hurry: a Memoir of Discovery, scheduled for publication in just a few weeks, on Feb. 24, that is already bringing a burst of press attention. Vogue is warning middle-aged women readers: "He is embarrassingly handsome."

Yet after seven years with Newsom as governor, California is still suffering—not only from the problems Newsom got elected originally trying to fix, but from others that he has helped create along the way.

"We have the highest poverty rate in the United States of America," said a former mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigosa. "In our cities, we’ve had too much crime." Villaraigosa said the state had spent $24 billion supposedly combating homelessness, "and homelessness went up."

"Let’s face it, the cost of gas is high," acknowledged the state’s superintendent of public instruction, Tony Thurmond, another Democrat running for governor.

If Newsom does end up as the Democratic presidential nominee in 2028, his opponents in the primary and general elections could make a pretty good attack ad just showing six other Democrats talking about what one of them, the mayor of San Jose, Matt Mahan, called "the brutally high cost of housing" and "the obvious failures of our policies to address homelessness."

The former California state controller, Betty Yee, said politicians "should feel ashamed" of the impacts that "green energy" policies have had on low-income communities. She said the California government is "spending more than we are bringing in," even though the state is not in a recession.

Yee said Californians "can’t afford a leader who thinks grandstanding is actually governing." She left unclear who the comment was directed at, but California voters are surely picking up what she was putting down.

Another Democratic candidate, Xavier Becerra, a former California attorney general and former U.S. secretary of health and human services, said "the governor’s office is not a place for on-the-job training or inflated promises." Like Yee, he didn’t name the target of that comment, but it also might have been interpreted as casting shade at Newsom, who was elected in 2018 and is term-limited.

The sole Republican candidate on the debate stage, Steve Hilton, said "the biggest driver of the high cost of living is Democrat policies." He said the state had suffered from "16 years of Democrat one-party rule." The most recent Republican governor of California was Arnold Schwarzenegger, who left office in January 2011. Presidents Nixon and Reagan were California Republicans, as was House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, but the party has struggled to compete in statewide elections in recent years.

As in other Democrat-dominated cities and states, the effect has been that the highest-stakes ideological battles are sometimes within the Democratic Party itself. Some of those rifts were on display in the debate, with Thurmond and billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer anchoring the far left, and Villaraigosa and Mahan sounding more pragmatic, technocratic, and moderate by comparison. Steyer, Thurmond, and Yee backed a billionaire tax that, as Steyer put it, has rendered "the big tech CEOs … terrified." Steyer and Thurmond also said they favored abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Thurmond said he backed "universal health care for all, including undocumented immigrants." Steyer said he backs rent control.

A question about whether the candidates backed Newsom’s push to ban gas-powered vehicles in the state by 2035 also exposed differences among the candidates, with Thurmond and Yee favoring the policy and with Villaraigosa and Hilton opposing it. Mahan dodged: "only if the technology is there."

Other sections of the debate dealt with California’s incomplete and over-budget high-speed rail project; its K-12 public education system that was compared unfavorably to that of Mississippi; homeowners insurers fleeing the state; and a lack of funding for drug treatment programs.

If the Democrats don’t nominate Newsom for president in 2028, there is always Kamala Harris, another California Democrat. The nonpartisan primary election in the governor’s race is June 2, 2026. Several candidates who did not participate in the televised debate are also running in the primary, including Rep. Eric Swalwell, who is a Democrat, and the sheriff of Riverside County, Calif., Chad Bianco, who is a Republican.

https://freebeacon.com/california/newsoms-failures-exposed-in-california-gubernatorial-debate/

Mike Tyson DELIVERS KNOCKOUT BLOW To Big Food In EPIC Super Bowl Ad

 by Steve Watson

In a stunning Super Bowl spot that cuts through the corporate clutter, boxing legend Mike Tyson lays bare the hidden killer in America’s diet: processed foods. Backed by the Trump administration’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative, Tyson pulled no punches, calling out the lies that have fueled an obesity epidemic and chronic diseases ravaging the nation.

The ad marks a pivotal win in the fight against Big Food’s grip, aligning perfectly with the administration’s aggressive push to slash added sugars and promote nutrient-dense, American-grown eats. It’s a clear signal that the junk food agenda is on the ropes.

The ad features Tyson in raw, black-and-white footage, delivering a personal and powerful message. “The most important fight of my life isn’t in the ring,” Tyson declares. “I’m not fighting for a belt. I’m fighting for our health. Processed foods are killing us. We have been lied to and we need to eat real food again.”

Tyson shares his own battles, revealing he once ballooned to 340 pounds, describing himself as “fat and nasty” while downing “a quart of ice cream every hour.” He drives home the tragedy by recounting how his sister died at 25 from a heart attack linked to obesity. “We’re the most powerful country in the world, and we have the most obese, fudgy people,” he adds, slamming the complacency that has allowed ultra-processed junk to dominate shelves.

On screen, stark warnings flash: “Processed Food Kills” followed by “Eat Real Food,” culminating with Tyson and his son biting into fresh apples, directing viewers to RealFood.gov for more.

Tyson today posted the ad on X, emphasizing its urgency. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. responded with praise: “Thank you for sharing your story Mike — and delivering the most important message in Super Bowl history. We don’t have to be the sickest country in the developed world. The answer is simple: EAT REAL FOOD.”

Tyson replied: “Thank you @SecKennedy for prioritizing our country’s disease epidemic and how real food is a big part of the solution. Our nation’s health is our real wealth.”

This collaboration underscores the Trump admin’s no-nonsense approach to health, building on the massive MAHA reset announced last month. As previously covered, Secretary Kennedy and USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins overhauled federal dietary guidelines, declaring war on added sugars and ultra-processed foods while championing high-quality proteins, healthy fats, and whole foods from American farms.

That reset ended subsidies for junk in schools and federal programs, targeting the root of skyrocketing healthcare costs and chronic illnesses pushed by globalist food giants. Tyson’s ad amplifies this, exposing how Big Food’s additives and lies have eroded public health, aligning with America First priorities to rebuild strength from the inside out.

The ad’s impact is undeniable—viewers flooded social media with support, vowing to ditch the processed slop for real, homegrown nutrition. It’s a direct hit against those who profit from keeping Americans sick and dependent on pharma fixes.

The Super Bowl ad reaches millions at a time when obesity rates hover near 40 percent, draining billions in taxpayer dollars. Tyson’s raw testimony cuts through the noise, reminding us that true freedom starts with controlling what we put in our bodies—not letting corporate overlords dictate our decline.

https://modernity.news/2026/02/06/mike-tyson-delivers-knockout-blow-to-big-food-in-epic-super-bowl-ad/