Search This Blog

Sunday, September 16, 2018

NJ Gov puts bet on small pharma

Naresh Jain launched NJ Biopharmaceuticals LLC this summer in a laboratory off Route 1 and promptly hired three chemists who will research new drugs for late-stage cancer patients.
If his dream goes as planned, New Jerseyans could be big winners.
“The research has gone beyond imagination,” said Jain, 53, of Flemington. “We hope one day if we continue to make progress we can find a cure for cancer.”
NJ Biopharmaceuticals has set up shop at the Commercialization Center for Innovative Technologies, 50,000-square-feet of laboratory space that is attracting entrepreneurs who are developing a new generation of drugs.
It’s part of a new push by Gov. Phil Murphy to shift gears. New Jersey, a state that has depended on big pharma for research and job growth for more than a century, is turning its attention to small pharma to provide an economic jolt.
It appears to be an acknowledgment that the state’s long-standing dependence on big drugmakers alone isn’t healthy. Much of the industry’s growth is coming from smaller firms that have been attracted to other states.
“I think the strategy makes a lot of sense,” said Debbie Hart, president and chief executive officer of BioNJ, a trade group representing both big and small companies in the biotechnology industry. “A lot of the growth is coming from new, innovative companies.”
The Commercialization Center for Innovative Technologies — CCIT for short — sits in an office park that once belonged to Johnson & Johnson.
Operated by the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, the center houses 20 tenants who sign one-year leases for reasonable rent. It brings in speakers, lawyers and investors to help the scientists navigate the business world.
After five years, the entrepreneurs have to leave, either forced to admit defeat or to take the next step to bring their product to market.
One recent graduate, Amicus Therapeutics, now based in Cranbury, received FDA approval last month for a drug it developed to treat Fabry disease, a genetic disorder. It has 288 employees in the state.
Among the tenants now is Genomic Prediction, a company providing genetic testing to people with infertility. The company started a year ago and has grown to 10 employees, many of whom it recruits from nearby Rutgers University.
Its founder Nathan Treff is originally from Spokane, Washington. He spent time working in Madison, Wisconsin, and Boston, before he landed in New Jersey to take a job at an in-vitro fertilization clinic.
Treff started Genomic Prediction with two partners who were open to building the lab anywhere in the U.S. But they chose the lab space here because it offered support they needed and a line to a talented work force.
“When we thought about New Jersey, the incubator was a perfect spot,” said Treff, 41, of Bedminister.
For New Jersey’s life sciences industry, his decision is welcome news.
The state long has been considered the medicine chest of the world, home to 13 of the 20 biggest drug companies. But big pharma for nearly a decade has been retreating as its patents expired and generic competition picked up.
It downsized, consolidated and moved operations closer to researchers in other states.
New Jersey felt the sting. Scientific research and development employment in the state fell 22 percent from July 2009 to July 2017, according to U.S. Labor Departmentstatistics.
Other states advanced during that time. Massachusetts grew 39 percent, Californiagrew 15 percent, Pennsylvania grew 9 percent and New York grew 6 percent, government statistics said.
“The pharma model (for drug development) changed,” said Lenzie Harcum, CCIT’s program manager. “There were a lot of things going off patent, so they couldn’t maintain the same big, huge campus environments. They couldn’t maintain that same production. They need to change a little bit.”
“In the meantime there’s an entrepreneurial environment from the ex-pharma employees that’s growing around here,” he said. “A lot of it.”
New Jersey still has plenty of big drug companies that partner with startups to bring the final product to the market — a process that BioNJ’s Hart said can take more than $2 billion and more than 10 years.
But they have had to search externally to find the next potential blockbuster.
How to restock the medicine chest?
New Jersey has expanded the number of life science startup laboratories, known as incubators, from four to six in the past year. Johnson & Johnson, Celgene and Hackensack Meridian Health are among the private companies that have invested in them.
Murphy expanded rent assistance to biotech startups that set up shop in the incubators through a program called the Incubator and Collaborative Workspace Rent Initiative. The EDA on Wednesday invited entrepreneurs to vote on a new name to help rebrand the program.
Murphy and the Legislature approved $1 million in the recent budget to bring back the state’s New Jersey Commission on Science and Technology, eight years after it was defunded. And Murphy named New York University professor Beth Noveck as the state’s first chief innovation officer. Both moves are designed to foster smaller, high-tech companies.
Big pharma’s retrenchment had a huge impact on the job market, but smaller companies could fill the gap, said Tom Sullivan, senior vice president of the life sciences group at real estate company CBRE in East Brunswick.
One sign of life: After falling steadily for eight years, scientific research and development employment in New Jersey rose 2.5 percent from July 2017 to July 2018, Labor Department statistics showed.
Can the momentum continue?
Naresh Jain thinks so.
He came to New Jersey from the Scripps Research Institute in San Diego in 1999 to take a job as a chemist at Johnson & Johnson in Bridgewater. But the corporate bureaucracy began to frustrate him.
He dipped into his savings to start The Chemistry Research Solution in 2009. It was the depth of the Great Recession, but he found affordable lab space in Bristol, Pennsylvania, and scientists who were looking for work.

Shingles vax gives Glaxo shot in the arm


GlaxoSmithKline’s new shingles vaccine is racking up sales well beyond expectations.
It couldn’t come at a better time. The British drug maker is steadily losing revenue from former top seller Advair, the blockbuster asthma inhaler that brought in $8.7 billion in 2013. Demand for price discounts has already cut that by half, and U.S. competition should intensify soon, likely slashing revenue even more.
Meanwhile, sales are dropping for some other older prescription drugs and GSK’s consumer health products.
Sales of the Shingrix vaccine are soaring, hitting $363 million in the first half of 2018, because it’s far more effective than rival Merck’s older vaccine, Zostavax, says Damien Conover, director of health care stock research at investment firm Morningstar.
Conover says it’s unlikely Shingrix sales will fully offset Advair’s decline, but he expects GSK’s popular HIV medicines and several newer respiratory products including Anoro and Trelegy inhalers to boost revenue over time.
He expects GSK shares to rise significantly from their current $39 level.
“We see the stock as undervalued,” says Conover, adding that it offers a strong dividend.

BeiGene announces four presentations at Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology


BeiGene announced four oral clinical data presentations on two of its late-stage investigational therapies, tislelizumab and zanubrutinib, at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology. The meeting will take place September 19 – 23 in Xiamen, China. Tislelizumab is an investigational anti-PD-1 antibody, and zanubrutinib is an investigational small molecule inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase.
https://thefly.com/landingPageNews.php?id=2790973

Biotech week ahead, Sept. 17


Biotech were trending mostly sideways in the week ending Sept. 14 after posting weekly gains in the previous two weeks. Notwithstanding the overall muted sentiment, there was some activity in reaction to the release of clinical trial results.
The iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (ETF) IBB 0.51% remains on track to end the week modestly higher, having gained about 0.5 percent through Thursday.
The following are noteworthy catalysts for biotech investor to focus on in the unfolding week:

Conferences

  • 9th International Congress of the Growth Hormone Research and IGF Societies, or GRS & IGF: Sept. 14-17, in Seattle.
  • European Respiratory Society, or ERS, International Congress 2018: Sept. 15-19 in Paris
  • Janney Montgomery Scott Healthcare Conference 2018: Sept. 17-18 at the Union League Club in New York City
  • 24th World Cardiology Conference: Sept. 17-18 in Tin Shui Wai, Hong Kong
  • 25th Annual Cardiologists Conference : Sept. 17-18 in Hong Kong
  • 3rd International Conference on Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Disorders: Sept. 17-18 in Philadelphia
  • 12th World Congress on Advances and Innovations in Dementia: Sept. 17-18 in Singapore City
  • 25th International Conference on Neurology: Neurochemistry, Neuropharmacology and Neurosciences: Sept. 17-18 in Dubai
  • 3rd International Conference on Tumor & Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy: Sept. 17-18 in San Diego
  • Second annual summit on Cell Signaling and Cancer Therapy” Sept. 19 –20 in Philadelphia
  • Second annual summit on Cell Metabolism and Cytopathology: Sept. 19-20 in Philadelphia
  • Annual Summit on Pain Management – Opioid Drugs – Sep. 19-20, in San Diego, U.S.
  • 9th International Conference on Cardiac Surgery: Sept. 20-21, in Oslo
  • 6th International Conference on Hepatology: Sept. 21-22 in Osaka
  • The FDA is set to rule on Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (ADR) ADR TEVA 2.86%‘s BLA for its migraine treatment candidate fremanezumab Sunday.

Clinical Trial Results

  • Mylan NV MYL 1.47% and Theravance Biopharma Inc TBPH 1.29% are due to release new data on their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment revefenacin at the ERS International Congress 2018 on Sunday.
  • VERONA PHARMA P/S ADR NASDAQVRNA will present expanded Phase 2b data for its COPD candidate RPL554 at the ERS International Congress 2018 at 8:30 am EST Monday, Sept. 17.

Q3 Schedule

  • Omeros Corporation OMER 1.22% is scheduled to release Phase 2 data for its OMS721 for treating IgA nephropathy.
  • ZEALAND PHARMA/S ADR ZEAL 0.61% will release Phase 3 data for its dasiglucagon to treat severe hypoglycemia in diabetes.
  • Galectin Therapeutics Inc. Common Stock GALT 1.12% is due to release Phase 1 data for its melanoma treatment combination GR-MD-02 and Merck & Co., Inc. MRK 1.24%‘s Keytruda.
  • GALAPAGOS NV/S ADR GLPG 2.26% is due to release Phase 2 data for its combo treatment GLPG 2451+2222+2737 for cystic fibrosis.
  • Novo Nordisk A/S (ADR) NVO 2.13% will release Phase 2 data for its concizumab that is being evaluated as a treatment option for hemophilia A. The company is also set to release Phase 3 extension data for its adult growth hormone deficiency treatment candidate somapacitan.
  • Celsion Corporation CLSN 0.71% is likely to release Phase 1b data for its ovarian cancer treatment candidate GEN-1.
  • Geron Corporation GERN 3.53% and Johnson & Johnson JNJ 0.31% are scheduled to release primary analysis of data from the Phase 2 IMbark study for Imetelstat to treat myelofibrosis.
  • Amarin Corporation plc (ADR) AMRN 1.36% is due to release Phase 3 data for its Vascepa to treat high triglycerides with mixed dyslipidemia.
  • Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc INO 3.99% will release Phase 1 data for its prostate cancer treatment candidate INO-5150.
  • Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. LXRX 0.55% is due to release Phase 1b data for its Type 2 diabetes treatment candidate LX2761.
  • Syndax Pharmaceuticals Inc SNDX 4.84% is set to release Phase 3 progression-free survival data for E2112, its treatment candidate for HR+ and HER2- breast cancer.
  • Cytokinetics, Inc. CYTK 3.4% will release interim analysis of Phase 1b data for its CK-2127107 for limited mobility. The company will also release results of a Phase 2 study of the same candidate for treating COPD.
  • Proteostasis Therapeutics Inc PTI 5.06% is set to release final Phase 1 data for its cystic fibrosis treatment PTI-801.
  • TapImmune Inc. TPIV 1.75% will release Phase 2 interim response data for TPIV200 that is being evaluated as second-line treatment for triple-negative breast cancer.
  • Radius Health Inc RDUS 2.83% is expected to release Phase 1 data for AB122 for treating solid tumors.
  • Ra Pharmaceuticals Inc RARX 1.25% is scheduled to release Phase 1b pharmacokinetics data for RA101495 SC, its pipeline candidate for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.
  • AnaptysBio Inc ANAB 0.57% is due to release Phase 2a data for its ANB020 that is being evaluated for severe adult eosinophilic asthma.
  • argenx SE – ADR ARGX 4.9% will release Phase 2 data for its immune thrombocytopenia treatment ARGX-113.
  • CTI BioPharma Corp CTIC is due to release interim Phase 2 data for pacritinib, its pipeline candidate for myelofibrosis.

IPO

Y-MABS Therapeutics, a developer of antibody-based therapeutic cancer products, is set to offer 5.33 million shares in an IPO, with the shares expected to be priced between $14 and $16. The shares are to be listed on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol YMAB.
Elanco Animal Health, a spin-off unit of Eli Lilly And Co LLY 0.79%‘s global animal health medicines and vaccines business, is due to offer 62.9 million shares in an IPO, with an estimated price range per share of $20-$23. The shares will be listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol ELAN.

Largest study of ‘post-treatment controllers’ holds clues on HIV remission


Most HIV patients need to take daily anti-retroviral therapy — if they suspend treatment, HIV will rebound within 3-4 weeks. But clinical trials have revealed that a small fraction of patients can stop taking medications yet keep the virus suppressed for 24 weeks or longer, maintaining viral control without the assistance of medication.
Much remains unknown about this unique group of individuals, known as HIV post-treatment controllers, including how rare this ability is. Two new studies — including the largest study of post-treatment controllers to date — explore the characteristics of this group as well as the biological mechanisms that may help explain this unique ability.
“Post-treatment controllers represent a natural model of sustained remission,” said Jonathan Li, MD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital’s Infectious Disease Clinic and lead author on both studies. “Understanding these individuals can lead to new insights for HIV therapies.”
The researchers defined post-treatment controllers as having viral loads of 400 or fewer copies per milliliter of blood plasma for at least 24 weeks’ post-treatment interruption. The study characterized 67 post-treatment controllers, the largest cohort to date. They found these post-treatment controllers by sifting through data collected from over 700 participants in 14 clinical studies involving treatment interruption.
The CHAMP (Control of HIV after Antiretroviral Medication Pause) study, published in The Journal of Infectious Disease, examined what post-treatment control can tell us about HIV’s progression. The researchers observed that individuals treated early were significantly more likely to become post-treatment controllers. Previously published studies have found other benefits for early treatment, notably decreased risk of transmission to partners compared to treatment starting during chronic infection.
A second study published in The Journal of Clinical Investigationilluminated the biological mechanisms underlying post-treatment control. Li’s team sequenced viral DNA, which the HIV virus had woven into the patient’s DNA.
The team observed that post-treatment controllers had lower levels of intact viral DNA prior to treatment interruption. In other words, post-treatment controllers carried smaller viral reservoirs. Li believes that reservoir size could represent a useful biomarker to help predict which patients will become post-treatment controllers.
In addition to intact viral DNA, Li and his team found that reservoirs of defective viral DNA may offer novel insights for treating HIV. They observed that defective HIV DNA seemed to give rise to proteins that could interact with the immune system. They plan to study this further.
“Each year, there are millions of new HIV infections,” said Li. “The results of these studies may help inform the design of strategies and trials aimed at achieving HIV remission, which we hope will bend the curve of this epidemic.”
Story Source:
Materials provided by Brigham and Women’s HospitalNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal References:
  1. Golnaz Namazi, Jesse M Fajnzylber, Evgenia Aga, Ron Bosch, Edward P Acosta, Radwa Sharaf, Wendy Hartogensis, Jeffrey M Jacobson, Elizabeth Connick, Paul Volberding, Daniel Skiest, David Margolis, Michael C Sneller, Susan J Little, Sara Gianella, Davey Smith, Daniel R Kuritzkes, Roy M Gulick, John W Mellors, Vikram Mehraj, Rajesh T Gandhi, Ronald Mitsuyasu, Robert T Schooley, Keith Henry, Pablo Tebas, Steve Deeks, Tae-Wook Chun, Ann C Collier, Jean-Pierre Routy, Frederick M Hecht, Bruce D Walker, Jonathan Z Li. The Control of HIV after Antiretroviral Medication Pause (CHAMP) study: post-treatment controllers identified from 14 clinical studiesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2018; DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy479
  2. Radwa Sharaf, Guinevere Q. Lee, Xiaoming Sun, Behzad Etemad, Layla M. Aboukhater, Zixin Hu, Zabrina L. Brumme, Evgenia Aga, Ronald J. Bosch, Ying Wen, Golnaz Namazi, Ce Gao, Edward P. Acosta, Rajesh T. Gandhi, Jeffrey M. Jacobson, Daniel Skiest, David M. Margolis, Ronald Mitsuyasu, Paul Volberding, Elizabeth Connick, Daniel R. Kuritzkes, Michael M. Lederman, Xu G. Yu, Mathias Lichterfeld, Jonathan Z. Li. HIV-1 proviral landscapes distinguish posttreatment controllers from noncontrollersJournal of Clinical Investigation, 2018; 128 (9): 4074 DOI: 10.1172/JCI120549

New method promises fewer side effects from cancer drugs


Protein research is one of the hottest areas in medical research because proteins make it possible to develop far more effective pharmaceuticals for the treatment of diabetes, cancer and other illnesses.
However, while proteins have great potential, they also present great challenges for scientists. Proteins have incredibly complex chemical structures that make them difficult to modify. As a result, researchers have been looking for a tool to modify them more precisely, without increasing a drug’s side-effects.
“We often run the risk of not being approved by health authorities because protein-based drugs lack precision and may have side-effects. Among other things, this is because of the serious limitations with the tools that have been used up until now,” according to Professor Knud J. Jensen of the University of Copenhagen’s Department of Chemistry.
Together with his research colleague, Sanne Schoffelen, he has developed a new protein-modifying method that promises fewer side-effects and could be pivotal in furthering the development of protein-based pharmaceuticals. Their work has been published in the distinguished journal, Nature Communications.
Protein structure is like an intricate ball of yarn
Researchers call the method “His-tag acylation.” Among other things, it makes it possible to add a toxic molecule to proteins that can attack sick cells in a cancer-stricken body without attacking healthy ones.
“Proteins are like a ball of yarn, a long thread of amino acids, which are turned up. This method allows us to precisely target these intricate structures, as opposed to making uncertain modifications when we don’t know what is being hit within the ball of yarn. In short, it will help produce drugs where we can be far more confident about where modifications are being made, so that side effects can be minimized in the future,” says Knud J. Jensen.
Modified proteins must target precisely
The fact that His-tag acylation can accurately target these complex yarn-like protein structures also makes it possible to produce drugs with entirely new characteristics.
For example, researchers can now attach a fluorescent molecule to proteins in such a way that a microscope can be used to track a protein’s path through cells. The primary function of these proteins is to transport cancer fighting molecules around to sick cells, so it is important to carefully follow their path throughout the body in order to safely produce medications that don’t have unintended side-effects.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Faculty of Science – University of CopenhagenNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Manuel C. Martos-Maldonado, Christian T. Hjuler, Kasper K. Sørensen, Mikkel B. Thygesen, Jakob E. Rasmussen, Klaus Villadsen, Søren R. Midtgaard, Stefan Kol, Sanne Schoffelen, Knud J. Jensen. Selective N-terminal acylation of peptides and proteins with a Gly-His tag sequenceNature Communications, 2018; 9 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05695-3

BPA replacements in plastics cause reproductive problems in lab mice


Twenty years ago, researchers made the accidental discovery that the now infamous plastics ingredient known as bisphenol A or BPA had inadvertently leached out of plastic cages used to house female mice in the lab, causing a sudden increase in chromosomally abnormal eggs in the animals. Now, the same team is back to report in the journal Current Biology on September 13 that the array of alternative bisphenols now used to replace BPA in BPA-free bottles, cups, cages, and other items appear to come with similar problems for their mice.
“This paper reports a strange déjà vu experience in our laboratory,” says Patricia Hunt of Washington State University.
The new findings were uncovered much as before as the researchers again noticed a change in the data coming out of studies on control animals. Again, the researchers traced the problem to contamination from damaged cages, but the effects this time, Hunt says, were more subtle than before. That’s because not all of the cages were damaged and the source of contamination remained less certain.
However, she and her colleagues were able to determine that the mice were being exposed to replacement bisphenols. They also saw that the disturbance in the lab was causing problems in the production of both eggs and sperm.
Once they got the contamination under control, the researchers conducted additional controlled studies to test the effects of several replacement bisphenols, including a common replacement known as BPS. Those studies confirm that replacement bisphenols produce remarkably similar chromosomal abnormalities to those seen so many years earlier in studies of BPA.
Hunt notes that the initial inadvertent exposure of their animals was remarkably similar to what might happen in people using plastics in that the exposure was accidental and highly variable. Not all of the animals’ cages were damaged, and so the findings differed among animals in different cages.
She adds that — although determining the levels of human exposure is difficult — their controlled experiments were conducted using low doses of BPS and other replacement bisphenols thought to be relevant to exposure in people using BPA-free plastics.
These problems, if they hold true in people as has been shown in the case of BPA, will carry over to future generations through their effects on the germline. The researchers showed that, if it were possible to eliminate bisphenol contaminants completely, the effects would still persist for about three generations.
Hunt says more work is needed to determine whether some replacement bisphenols might be safer than others, noting that there are dozens of such chemicals now in use. She also suspects that other widely used and endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including parabens, phthalates, and flame retardants, may be having similarly adverse affects on fertility that warrant much more study.
“The ability to rapidly enhance the properties of a chemical has tremendous potential for treating cancer, enhancing medical and structural materials, and controlling dangerous infectious agents,” the researchers write. “Importantly, this technology has paved the way for ‘green chemistry,’ a healthier future achieved by engineering chemicals to ensure against hazardous effects. Currently, however, regulatory agencies charged with assessing chemical safety cannot keep pace with the introduction of new chemicals. Further, as replacement bisphenols illustrate, it is easier and more cost effective under current chemical regulations to replace a chemical of concern with structural analogs rather than determine the attributes that make it hazardous.”
Hunt’s advice to consumers now is simple: BPA-free or not, “plastic products that show physical signs of damage or aging cannot be considered safe.”
Support for these studies was provided from the NIH.
Story Source:
Materials provided by Cell PressNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Tegan S. Horan, Hannah Pulcastro, Crystal Lawson, Roy Gerona, Spencer Martin, Mary C. Gieske, Caroline V. Sartain, Patricia A. Hunt. Replacement Bisphenols Adversely Affect Mouse Gametogenesis with Consequences for Subsequent GenerationsCurrent Biology, 2018; DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.070