Search This Blog

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Stem Cell Transplant May Help Some With Aggressive MS


A stem cell transplant may help some people with multiple sclerosis (MS) when standard drugs fail, a new clinical trial finds.
The study focused on 110 patients with aggressive cases of MS: Their symptoms had flared up at least twice in the past year despite taking standard medication, and they’d already tried an average of three of those drugs.
Researchers randomly assigned the patients to either keep trying other medications or have a stem cell transplant — using cells taken from their own blood.
Over an average of three years, MS progressed in 34 of 55 patients on medication — meaning their disabilities worsened. That compared with only three of 55 patients given a stem cell transplant.
It’s a striking difference, said lead researcher Dr. Richard Burt, adding that the results were even better than his team anticipated.
That said, Burt cautioned that only a small minority of MS patients would be possible transplant candidates. And for now, only certain medical centers have the necessary experience and expertise.
“Any treatment that is powerful can also be dangerous,” said Burt, who is chief of immunotherapy and autoimmune diseases at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago. “You don’t want to use it too soon, or too late. And you don’t want to overuse it.”
Those precautions were echoed by Bruce Bebo, executive director of research for the National Multiple Sclerosis Society.
“This study should be celebrated,” said Bebo, who was not involved in the research. “It’s the first randomized, controlled clinical trial of this strategy.”
But, he stressed, the treatment is still experimental and can only be done safely at a handful of centers around the world.
Stem cell transplants are done at many hospitals to treat cancer. But, Bebo said, there’s an “art and science” to using them for MS.
MS is a neurological disorder caused by a misguided immune system attack on the body’s own myelin — the protective sheath around nerve fibers in the spine and brain. Depending on where the damage occurs, symptoms include vision problems, muscle weakness, numbness and difficulty with balance and coordination.
About 85 percent of people with MS are initially diagnosed with the “relapsing-remitting” form of the disease, according to the National MS Society. That means symptoms flare up for a time and then ease. But most people eventually transition to a progressive form of the disease and their disability worsens over time.
The new trial included only patients with relapsing-remitting MS, because that point in the disease is when immune system inflammation is inflicting its damage.
Why would a stem cell transplant help? The idea, Burt explained, is to basically “reboot” the immune system and stop it from attacking.
Stem cells from the bone marrow are the building blocks of the immune system. In this trial, patients had a supply of their own bone marrow stem cells removed and stored, then underwent a few days of chemotherapy to knock down their existing immune system.
After that, the stored stem cells were infused back into the body, where over time, the immune system rebuilt itself.
Half of the study patients had that procedure. The other half continued with disease-modifying drugs — like natalizumab (Tysabri), interferon (Avonex) and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone). Those medications can slow, but not stop, MS progression, Burt said.
Over the next few years, stem cell transplant patients were much less likely to see their MS progress, the study found.
“And, Burt said, “their quality of life markedly improved.”
When patients rated their quality of life on a standard scale, the transplant group reported an average 20-point gain one year later. Those ratings dipped a few points among patients on medication.
The study, published in the Jan. 15 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, was funded by government and foundation grants.
Burt cautioned that stem cell transplants carry risks, including serious, even fatal, infections while the immune system is suppressed. No patient in this trial died.
Bebo also pointed out that the study patients did not take the newest MS drugs, such as a medication called Ocrevus (ocrelizumab), which was approved after this trial ended in 2016.
“It’s unclear how stem cell transplants compare with the most effective current drug therapies,” Bebo said.
More information
The National MS Society has more on stem cell transplants.
SOURCES: Richard Burt, M.D., chief, immunotherapy and autoimmune diseases, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago; Bruce Bebo, Ph.D., executive vice president, research, National Multiple Sclerosis Society; Jan. 15, 2019, Journal of the American Medical Association, online

Are Some Opioid Abusers Using Their Pets to Get Drugs?


To fight America’s opioid epidemic, lawmakers and regulators have clamped down hard on doctors’ prescribing practices.
But one avenue for obtaining prescription opioids appears to have been overlooked, according to a new study.
Veterinarians are prescribing large quantities of opioids to pets, raising concern that some people might be using Fido or Snuggles to feed their addiction.
Opioid prescriptions from the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Veterinary Medicine rose 41 percent between 2007 and 2017, even though the annual number of visits increased by just 13 percent, researchers found.
Penn Vet handed out 105 million tramadol tablets, 97,500 hydrocodone (Hycodan) tablets, and nearly 39,000 codeine tablets during the study period, results show.
“I think it would come as a surprise to everyone, the quantities,” said senior author Dr. Jeanmarie Perrone, director of medical toxicology at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine.
Not just for pets
It’s very likely at least some of these drugs wound up being used by humans, said Emily Feinstein, executive vice president of the Center on Addiction.
“There’s a small percentage, I’m sure, of people in this data who are using their pets and an encounter with a veterinarian as a means of getting themselves opioids,” Feinstein said.
The U.S. opioid crisis led to roughly 50,000 overdose deaths in 2017, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Americans now are more likely to die from an opioid overdose than from a car or motorcycle crash, a fall, drowning or choking on food, a report issued Tuesday by the National Safety Council concluded.
Perrone initiated her study after vet school colleagues complained that they’d been getting a lot of after-hours calls from patients about filling opioid prescriptions for pets. They asked her advice about how to handle these requests.
“Before I went to talk, I asked them to pull all of their opioid prescriptions so I’d have an idea how often they actually prescribed opioids,” Perrone said. “To their shock and our shock, there were about 3,000 prescriptions a month.”
Perrone thought back to when she’d had her own dog spayed, and the vet handed her a bag of supplies to care for her recovering canine. She went looking for that bag.
“I found a bottle of tramadol I was given when my dog got spayed four years ago. It was still in the cabinet with all the dog stuff,” Perrone said.
Following general trends
After looking at Penn Vet’s prescribing practices, Perrone’s team obtained statewide prescription data kept by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency for all Pennsylvania veterinarians.
Between 2014 and 2017, Pennsylvania vets doled out 688,340 hydrocodone (Hycodan) tablets, 14,100 codeine tablets, 23,110 fentanyl patches, 171,100 tablets of hydromorphone (Dilaudid) and 7,600 doses of oxycodone (Oxycontin), the federal data showed.
The findings were published Jan. 10 in the journal JAMA Network Open.
The opioid epidemic stems from a shift in medical philosophy, in which pain’s role as a symptom to be treated became more prominent and the risks of opioid addiction were not fully appreciated, Feinstein said.
“Veterinarians live in the same society as the rest of us,” she said. “It’s not surprising to see the same trends happening in veterinary medicine as were happening in the rest of medicine. All of medicine was prescribing more opioids and thinking they were safe.”
Beyond the risk of people “vet shopping” for drugs, Feinstein said the numbers suggest pet cabinets across the country might contain opioids ripe for misuse.
“If there is someone with an opioid use problem in your circle, those leftover pills can become a temptation if they’re not safely locked up,” she said.
Dr. John de Jong, president of the American Veterinary Medical Association, said he hasn’t seen any data to suggest that what was found in Pennsylvania is occurring elsewhere.
“First, this is a survey of veterinarians at a veterinary teaching hospital to which complex cases are referred and for which more extensive pain management is often needed,” de Jong said. “It is inappropriate to extrapolate results from a practice like that to primary care practices across the country.”
Second, pain management is a rapidly emerging field in veterinary medicine, de Jong said.
“The period of this study overlaps a period of significant growth in understanding pain and its impact on veterinary patients,” he said. “It is reasonable to expect that as knowledge grows, so will efforts to address related concerns. So, it’s very possible that this study doesn’t reflect overprescribing, but instead reflects appropriate prescribing representing better pain management in veterinary patients.”
Better monitoring
At the same time, vets are starting to keep a closer eye on their opioid prescriptions, de Jong added.
“There appear to have been few confirmed cases of owners deliberately injuring their pets to obtain opioids,” he said. “We have heard more veterinarians share that they suspect some pet owners may be using their pet’s medications and asking for refills in advance of when those should be needed, or that they’ve lost or spilled medications, but this is anecdotal.”
These results suggest vets need to be urged as strongly as other doctors to prescribe opioids with care, said Dr. Harshal Kirane, director of addiction services at Staten Island University Hospital in New York.
“Our national response to the opioid epidemic should leave no stone unturned,” Kirane said. “This work highlights that contemporary veterinary medicine uses a significant volume of opioid medications, yet lacks a systematic framework for safe opioid-prescribing practices. While the apparent scale of opioid medication management in animals is drastically smaller in comparison to humans, it still represents a powerful opportunity for practice improvement.”
In the meantime, pet owners should secure any opioids prescribed for their animals, and dispose of the drugs safely when they’re no longer needed, said Dr. Scott Krakower, assistant unit chief of psychiatry at Zucker Hillside Hospital in Glen Oaks, N.Y.
“I feel like sometimes you don’t even think of it. It may slip your mind that the medication is there in the cabinet,” Krakower said. “Sometimes it’s not clearly marked as a human medication may be.”
More information
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has more about safe disposal of unused medicines.
SOURCES: Jeanmarie Perrone, M.D., professor, emergency medicine, and director, medical toxicology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Emily Feinstein, J.D., executive vice president, Center on Addiction; John de Jong, D.V.M., president, American Veterinary Medical Association; Harshal Kirane, M.D., director, addiction services, Staten Island University Hospital, New York; Scott Krakower, D.O., assistant unit chief, psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, N.Y.; Jan, 11, 2019, JAMA Network Open

Medtronic Launches Mobile App Communicating Directly with Pacemaker


Medtronic plc (NYSE:MDT) today announced the launch of its MyCareLink Heart(TM) mobile app to support the world’s first and only portfolio of pacemakers that can communicate directly with patients’ smartphones and tablets.
Compatible with Medtronic BlueSync(TM) technology-enabled pacemakers, the MyCareLink Heart mobile app is designed to securely and wirelessly send device data to the Medtronic CareLink(TM) network via smart technology, eliminating the need for a dedicated bedside monitor or other remote monitoring hardware.
“For the first time, pacemakers have the ability to communicate securely and directly with technology that patients use every day like smartphones and tablets,” said Aisha Barry, vice president and general manager for the Connectivity & Insights business, which is part of the Cardiac and Vascular Group at Medtronic. “This brings the benefits of remote monitoring seamlessly into patients’ lives, potentially leading to enhanced and more efficient patient engagement with their physicians.”
BlueSync technology-enabled pacemakers include the Azure(TM) pacemaker and Percepta(TM), Serena(TM) and Solara(TM) quadripolar cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-Ps). Data collected by these devices is encrypted and sent to the CareLink network through the MyCareLink Heart mobile app, providing physicians with timely alerts on clinically-relevant patient events. The app also makes select pacemaker data easily accessible to patients including transmission success history, pacemaker battery information, answers to common questions about living with a pacemaker, and updates on physical activity.
“The MyCareLink Heart mobile app is a technological game-changer for people with pacemakers,” said James Allred, M.D., electrophysiologist at Cone Health Medical Group Heartcare in Greensboro, N.C. “The introduction of convenient and secure data transmissions and easy access to information like pacemaker battery life changes how patients track and understand their heart health.”
Upgrades to the MyCareLink Heart Mobile app technology will be available to patients’ devices over the lifetime of their BlueSync-enabled devices. Features currently include:
MyCareLink Heart Mobile App Features: * Transmission History: Provides patients with information about transmissions that have been sent to their doctors, as well as confirmation when transmissions are received by physicians.
* Vitals Tracking: Allows patients to record weight, blood pressure and heart rate in the app, and to track these measurements over time to help better understand health status. This information is only stored on their mobile device; it is not sent to the clinic.
* Battery Longevity: Displays the estimated remaining battery life of patients’ Medtronic heart devices enabled with BlueSync technology.
* Symptom Journal: Allows patients to catalog symptomatic events which can be reviewed with their physicians during in-person clinic visits. This information is only stored on their mobile device; it is not sent to the clinic.
* Device Information: Displays device implant date, heart device name, model number and serial number – as well as patients’ clinic information.
* Education: Offers helpful information and common questions about living with a pacemaker.
* Physical Activity: Provides information about patients’ activity levels. The app uses data from patients’ heart devices to create daily, weekly and monthly views of physical activity.
In addition to building the MyCareLink Heart mobile app to deliver unique benefits for patients and clinicians, Medtronic prioritized high-level security design capabilities. The security controls built into BlueSync technology- enabled heart devices and the MyCareLink Heart mobile app include encryption and access restrictions designed to protect the device and data transmissions.

UnitedHealth Sales Rise Across Segments


UnitedHealth Group Inc. said sales grew in the fourth quarter as the company continued to see diversified revenue growth from health-care plan membership, premiums and its network of health services.
Revenue rose 12.2% to $58.42 billion from a year ago. Analysts polled by Refinitiv were expecting sales of $58.01 billion. Revenue from its UnitedHealthcare segment rose by 11% to $46.2 billion while sales from its Optum segment grew by 13% to 27.6 billion.
The parent of the nation’s largest health insurer said net earnings in the period ended Dec. 31 fell 16% to $3.04 billion, or $3.10 a share, from a year earlier. Analysts expected the company to earn $3.05 a share.
On an adjusted basis, UnitedHealth reported profit of $3.28 a share, compared with analysts’ estimates of $3.21 a share.
UnitedHealth affirmed its guidance for the full year. It expects to report earnings of $13.70 to $14 a share a share, and adjusted earnings of $14.40 to $14.70 a share. It also expects cash flows from operations to be between $17.3 billion and $17.8 billion.

China’s Evergrande Health buys 51% of Swedish electric vehicle firm for $930M


Evergrande Health Industry Group Ltd said it would buy a 51 percent stake in National Electric Vehicle Sweden AB (NEVS) for $930 million, as the Chinese healthcare service provider continues to diversify into new energy automotive industry.

Evergrande Health, a unit of property developer China Evergrande Group, said it would buy the stake in National Electric Vehicle Sweden AB (NEVS) from a third party, Kerryman Holdings Ltd.
The first installment of $430 million was paid on Jan. 15, with the remainder to be paid on Jan. 31, it said.
Intelligent automobiles focussed NEVS, which acquired core assets and intellectual property rights of Saab Automobile AB in 2012, owns production bases in Trollhättan in Sweden and Tianjin in China. It is planning another production base in Shanghai.
Last month, Chinese electric vehicle developer Faraday Future signed a new restructuring agreement with its main investor Evergrande Health, ending a bitter legal fight.
Shares of Evergrande Health jumped as much as 8 percent to their highest in 20 months, outpacing a 0.4 pct slide in the broader market.

Stroke drug may also prevent Alzheimer’s


Researchers from the University of Southern California have discovered that a drug currently being developed to treat stroke patients could also prevent Alzheimer’s disease. The study, which will be published January 15 in the Journal of Experimental Medicine, shows that the genetically engineered protein 3K3A-APC protects the brains of mice with Alzheimer’s-like symptoms, reducing the buildup of toxic peptides and preventing memory loss.
3K3A-APC is a genetically modified version of a human blood protein called activated protein C, which reduces inflammation and protects both neurons and the cells that line the walls of blood vessels from death and degeneration. 3K3A-APC has beneficial effects in various mouse models of disease, including  and multiple sclerosis, and is currently being developed to treat stroke in humans, where it has been shown to be safe, well tolerated, and capable of reducing intracerebral bleeding.
“Because of its neuroprotective, vasculoprotective, and anti-inflammatory activities in multiple models of neurological disorders, we investigated whether 3K3A-APC can also protect the brain from the toxic effects of amyloid-β toxin in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease,” says Berislav V. Zlokovic, Director of the Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute at the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
Toxic amyloid-β peptides accumulate in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients, leading to neurodegeneration and reduced blood flow within the brain. Zlokovic and colleagues found that 3K3A-APC significantly reduced the accumulation of amyloid-β in the brains of mice that usually produce large amounts of the toxic peptide. 3K3A-APC treatment prevented these mice from losing their memory and helped maintain normal cerebral blood flow. The drug also suppressed inflammation within the brain, another common feature of Alzheimer’s disease.
Zlokovic and colleagues found that 3K3A-APC protects the brain by preventing nerve cells from producing an enzyme called BACE1 that is required to produce amyloid-β. Several different inhibitors of BACE1 have been tested in for Alzheimer’s disease, but the new study suggests that using 3K3A-APC to block the production of BACE1 could be an alternative approach, particularly at early stages of the disease when amyloid-β has yet to accumulate to levels capable of permanently damaging the .
“Our present data support the idea that 3K3A-APC holds potential as an effective anti-amyloid-β therapy for early stage Alzheimer’s disease in humans,” Zlokovic says.

Explore further

More information: Lazic et al., 2019. J. Exp. Med.jem.rupress.org/cgi/doi/10.1084/jem.20181035

Fraction of US outpatient treatment centers offer meds for opioid addiction


Despite the mounting death toll of America’s opioid crisis, only a minority of facilities that treat substance use disorders offer patients buprenorphine, naltrexone or methadone—the three FDA-approved medications for the long-term management of opioid use disorder, according to a new study from researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Notably, just six percent of medication-offering facilities offered all three FDA-approved medications to treat opioid use disorder, the study found. Ideally, facilities should be offering any of these three medications to best meet a patient’s needs, as some patients may benefit more from methadone, others from buprenorphine and yet others from naloxone, extended release.
In the study, published in the January issue of Health Affairs, the researchers analyzed national survey data and found that from 2007 to 2016, the proportion of substance use disorder  facilities that offered any medication treatment for opioid use disorder increased from 20 to only 36 percent. In other words, as recently as 2016, when the  was already deepening, nearly two-thirds of these facilities still did not offer such medications.
The analysis focused on the more than 10,000 facilities that offer outpatient services. Treatment facilities were significantly more likely to offer medication treatment in 2016 in states that have recently expanded Medicaid coverage, the researchers found.
“These results highlight the importance of Medicaid expansion in increasing the availability of medication treatment for opioid use disorder, though gaps in access remain widespread,” says study lead author Ramin Mojtabai, MD, professor in the Department of Mental Health at the Bloomberg School.
The misuse of opioids in the U.S. began to expand rapidly in the late 1990s and has since escalated to epidemic proportions. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated that from 2002 to 2017 the number of fatal opioid overdoses annually rose from about 12,000 to over 47,000. Yet, studies suggest that relatively few people with opioid dependency receive any substance use disorder treatment—and fewer still get treatment with FDA-approved medications.
To determine the reasons for this lack of treatment, Mojtabai and colleagues evaluated data gathered from 2007 to 2016 in yearly surveys of known treatment facilities by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
A key finding was that only 36.1 percent of these facilities offered any medication treatment for opioid use disorder in 2016, up from 20.0 percent in 2007. About 70 percent of these medication-offering facilities offered buprenorphine, 57.6 percent offered extended-release naltrexone and 28.7 percent offered methadone.
In general, there was wide variation in treatment available among states. Rhode Island, New York and Vermont topped the rankings with more than 70 percent of the facilities in each state offering one of the three FDA-approved medications. Hawaii (8.6 percent), Arkansas (14.1 percent) and Idaho (16.8 percent) had the lowest proportions of treatment facilities offering any FDA-approved medication. States with a higher prevalence of heroin use and more  overdose deaths tended to have treatment facilities offering medication treatment.
In recent years, 37 states have expanded Medicaid to low-income groups under the Affordable Care Act. Mojtabai and colleagues found that substance use disorder treatment facilities located in these Medicaid expansion states were about 21 percent more likely to offer medication treatment—and 89 percent more likely if the facility had a policy to accept Medicaid insurance.
“These results are likely related to the more robust coverage of medication treatment under Medicaid programs in expansion states,” Mojtabai says.
Even so, he notes that many low-income people still lack ready access to treatment facilities accepting reimbursement through state Medicaid programs.
Mojtabai and colleagues suggest that while continued Medicaid expansion and other changes to health insurance might continue to improve the situation in the long run, currently state governments have the power to expand  treatment availability more rapidly.
“States get block grants from SAMHSA for substance use and mental health facilities, and they could require facilities that receive these payments to offer  for  as a condition of receiving block grant funding,” Mojtabai says.
“Medication Treatment For Opioid Use Disorders In Substance Use Treatment Facilities” was written by Ramin Mojtabai, Christine Mauro, Melanie Wall, Colleen Barry, and Mark Olfson.

Explore further