Search This Blog

Sunday, September 19, 2021

US allegedly ignored virus warning months before China admitted to COVID-19

A Chinese pro-democracy activist said he attempted to warn the US about the emergence of COVID-19 when he first heard of a mysterious new virus in October 2019, an explosive documentary airing exclusively on Sky News Australia has uncovered.

Wei Jingsheng, a pro-democracy activist spoke to award-winning journalist Sharri Markson for a documentary titled, 'What Really Happened in Wuhan', also based on his book of the same name.

The former Chinese Communist Party insider said he alerted the intelligence agencies in the US in November 2019 but at that time, officials weren't "heavily concerned".

"I felt they were not as heavily concerned as I was so I tried my best to provide more detailed information," he told Ms Markson.

Wei Jingsheng, Chinese Defector and Democracy Campaigner.
Wei Jingsheng, Chinese Defector and Democracy Campaigner.

"They may not believe there is (a) government of a country that would do something like that (cover up a virus). So I kept repeating myself in an effort to try to persuade them."

China only alerted the World Health Organisation there was an outbreak on December 31 2019 and denied it was contagious up until late January 2020.

Mr Wei said he found out about the virus from high-level contacts in Beijing, and spoke to American politicians from the White House in November 2019.

Asked who the politician was, Mr Wei replied: "I'm not sure if this politician wants me to talk about him right here. But I want to say he is a high enough politician, high enough to be able to reach the President of the United States."

'What Really Happened in Wuhan': Special investigation to premiere on Sky News Australia

UP NEXT
  • It's been a 'very rough 18 months' for our Constitution: McGregor

    3:27

  • In Europe 'you pass reactors all the time'

    12:47

  • It's time for the 'eco-warriors to get out of the way'

    2:57

  • Australia 'is friends with the French' but must also 'act in its own i...

    2:07

  • Labor remains ahead in two-party preferred vote in latest Newspoll

    0:21

  • Rex Patrick discusses being an ‘accidental senator’ and his submariner...

    11:25

  • Independent senators have ‘very few constraints’

    11:25

An upcoming special television investigation by Sharri Markson and Sky News Australia is set to uncover critical new information and shocking claims about how the COVID-19 pandemic began. The global pandemic – which has now claimed

David Asher, the US State Department's former lead investigator, said the government failed to detect the urgency of the virus, admitting that if they had reacted to it, it would have been "like stopping 9/11 before it happened".

"We could have known in November of 2019, that there was a disaster occurring inside Wuhan – inside their most important biological facilities related to coronavirus research," he said. 

"It was something absolutely tragic, traumatic and dramatic that was occurring and we could have reacted to it. The whole world could have been different. It would have been like stopping 9/11 before it happened."

COVID-19 has taken the lives of more than 4.5 million people, and has destroyed the lives and economy of more than 200 countries worldwide.

Sharri Markson is an Investigations Editor at The Australian and host of Sharri on Sky News Australia. 

The documentary What Really Happened in Wuhan will air exclusively on Sky News at 8pm on Monday, September 20.

Video Player is loading.
It is almost like the relationship between the two great superpowers - China and the United States - is "in stalemate," according to The Australian's Associate Editor, Cameron Stewart. "It's frozen with a sort of complete distrust on every side," Mr Stewar

Technological Marvel of Combination Vaccines

 In recent days, Novavax and Moderna have announced the development of combination vaccines that would protect not only against COVID-19, but also against influenza. In the case of Moderna, they are testing a combination vaccine that also includes protection against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) -- a viral illness for which no vaccine is currently available. Such combination vaccines would be a major advancement. Because COVID-19 vaccines can be administered simultaneously with other vaccines, albeit in separate injections, it is no surprise that the next step is to co-formulate them in the same injection with other vaccinations.

What Makes Combination Vaccines So Valuable?

Combination vaccines are extremely valuable for several reasons, chief among them is convenience. If, during one visit to a provider, a person can get multiple vaccinations, it ensures uptake of all those vaccines without the need to schedule multiple visits or use multiple injections. A single needle puncture is better than multiple punctures, even for those who are not needle phobic. As more vaccines are developed, combination vaccines become critical in getting doses into arms with the minimum number of injections.

Combination vaccines are not a novel ideal. In fact, combination vaccines are the mainstay of routine vaccination. Children today receive several combination vaccinations including the well-known MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and DTap (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis). These types of vaccines have a long history with DTP, the first combination vaccine used in humans, dating to the 1940s. Pentacel immunizes against five different pathogens at once. Such convenience, especially with hard-to-reach populations, is invaluable. Adults also receive combination vaccinations, most prominently the Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis) boosters. Many physicians, including myself, wish there were more combination vaccination products available because they have the potential to significantly increase vaccination rates.

Safety and Efficacy

It is, of course, necessary to make sure that combination vaccines are as comparatively safe and efficacious as their individual counterparts. Because more antigen is present in a combination vaccine, injection site reactions might be more pronounced, fever might be slightly higher, and tolerability lower. For example, the four-target vaccine MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella) is not used for the first immunization against these pathogens. Because of a higher rate of febrile seizures, babies of about 15 months of age are given the varicella component separately. However, around age 5, the MMRV is used because this side effect is no longer a medical concern.

It is also important to establish that the separate components of a combination vaccine do not interfere with each other or blunt the immune response. This immune interference was a concern with vaccines combining Hib with DTap. For instance, vaccines with different storage conditions or delivery mechanisms (e.g., subcutaneous vs. intra-muscular; lipid nanoparticle encased) may not be the best candidates to combine. It is also important to combine vaccines that have compatible age or time-based schedules for administration.

As scientists explore a combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine, they will be looking closely at all of these safety and efficacy considerations, and countless others.

Combination Vaccines and the Anti-Vaccine Movement

It's important to emphasize, considering widespread disinformation from the anti-vaccine movement, that there is no "antigen overload" risk with combination vaccines. The human immune system is bombarded with antigens every day. We even become bacteremic, when we brush our teeth, or eat. The antigens contained in a combination vaccine are miniscule by comparison. The first vaccine ever created, against smallpox, was notoriously laden with all sorts of particles and impurities but was incredibly efficacious and led to control and eventual elimination of one of humanity's deadliest scourges.

In the present environment, we're likely to see individual attacks on COVID-19 combination vaccines long before they are available. We've previously seen such attacks on the MMR vaccine -- these attacks became so pervasive that manufactures started to produce the single vaccines again to placate those who were the victims of a concerted disinformation campaign. But we can learn from these past challenges. It will be important to fight disinformation about the COVID-19 combination vaccines early on, and encourage their uptake when they become available.

The Future of COVID-19 Vaccination

At this stage there are many unanswered questions about COVID-19 vaccination. What might a potential booster schedule look like? Will strain changes eventually be needed in response to variants? Will COVID-19 vaccination transition to a routine childhood vaccination? These questions are only the top of the iceberg. But one thing is certain: we should aim to make COVID-19 vaccination convenient, normal, and easy. Proactively working on next generation vaccines that do this by combining with other vaccinations, altering the mode of delivery (e.g., oral or nasal vaccines), or simplifying storage requirements are important tasks. And it's encouraging that we're pursuing this now. Vaccines are technological marvels, more valuable and important than the newest iPhone, and continually improving them will benefit us all.

Amesh Adalja, MD, is a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, an adjunct assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and an affiliate of the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/94571

Gottlieb: COVID-19 origins may never be known

 Former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) commissioner Scott Gottlieb said in an interview released on Sunday that the origins of COVID-19 may never be discovered.

"Either we find the intermediate host -- the animal that spread COVID -- or there's a whistleblower inside China. Or someone close to this, who knows that this came out of a lab, comes forward, defects, goes overseas, or we intercept some communication that we shouldn't have had access to. Absent something like that, we're not going to be able to answer this question," Gottlieb said while appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation."

"This is going to be a battle of competing narratives," he added.

In August, a group of researchers from the World Health Organization (WHO) published a report in the Nature science journal warning that the window for ascertaining the origins of COVID-19 was closing.

"SARS-CoV-2 antibodies wane, so collecting further samples and testing people who might have been exposed before December 2019 will yield diminishing returns," the researchers wrote at the time.

In his new interview with CBS, Gottlieb blasted the WHO for what he called its unwillingness to confront China during its mission to find COVID-19's origins.

"I think the WHO really did believe China was behaving in sort of an appropriate way and was providing cover for them as they were getting criticized by other parts of the world. Clearly, they weren't, and I think that that was knowable at the time in China didn't share the source strains," Gottlieb said to CBS's Margaret Brennan.

"The head of the WHO didn't want to push China on sharing the source strains publicly because he said, well, they have no commitment to do it, and he's right," he added, noting that there are no international laws that require countries to share virus samples.

"So clearly, the spirit of the International Health Regulations was that this should be shared. But because it wasn't the letter of the law, the W.H.O. didn't want to push China publicly to do it, even though that would have been very helpful for other nations," said Gottlieb.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/572904-gottlieb-covid-19-origins-may-never-be-known

White House argues vaccines for air travel

 The Biden administration is facing an internal debate over whether to impose vaccine mandates for air travel, with President Biden’s chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci saying he would support a mandate but the White House claiming a new policy isn’t forthcoming.

The potential of a mandate for domestic air travel would be fiercely opposed by Republicans and the travel industry and could add to the pushback Biden has received over his mandate on COVID-19 vaccines and testing for companies with at least 100 employees.

The White House sees the mandate on such businesses as politically popular, but it has run into opposition from GOP governors who have threatened to sue.

The administration could see a mandate to be vaccinated to fly as an issue that might find some support, but it also risks being seen as government overreach.

A flurry of questions was directed at White House officials this week after Fauci expressed his support for an air travel mandate.

“I would support that if you want to get on a plane and travel with other people that you should be vaccinated,” Fauci said on theSkimm podcast.

The idea isn’t off the table, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said on Thursday when asked about Fauci’s remarks.

“We haven’t taken options off the table, but I don’t have any updates to share with you at this point.  Our focus is on implementation of the big steps we announced last week,” she said.

White House chief of staff Ron Klain on a podcast this week said a vaccine mandate for domestic air travel is being considered.

“It’s something we continue to look at, we want to kind of weigh the number of people that these requirements could vaccinate versus the burden on the vaccinated, having to show proof every time you go on to an airplane, having to wait on longer lines at TSA. But I think it’s something we’ll look at as we continue to progress,” Klain said on the Pod Save America podcast.

Klain argued vaccines to travel don’t make quite as much sense as vaccines to go to a workplace, since it would impose heavy burdens on those showing the verification and checking it.

“We think the most efficient vaccine requirements are ones that where people are kind of in a permanent situation, on the job, in the military, where they verify once and then they’re verified in that scenario,” the chief of staff said.

Yet a number of restaurants, bars and music venues have imposed their own vaccine mandates, suggesting the requirement for plane travel, which confines people to close quarters, might make sense.

Jeff Zients, the White House coronavirus response coordinator, has said no measures are ruled out. He told reporters last week, when asked if the administration would impose a vaccine requirement or testing for domestic flights: “we’re not taking any measures off the table.”

Pressure to impose a mandate has already come from Congress.

Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) introduced legislation for all domestic airline and train travelers to show proof of vaccination or a present negative COVID-19 test in order to travel.

Former President Obama’s Transportation Sec. Ray LaHood said in a recent interview that the administration should push airlines to mandate vaccines for travelers and if they won’t, the White House should impose those mandates itself.

White House officials reportedly debated the idea of vaccine mandates for just international travelers before Biden’s announcement last week. The announcement, which puts the spotlight on the private sector to get their employees vaccinated or require testing, was sharply criticized by Republicans with some vowing to take Biden to court. 

Republican governors like Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R), Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R) and South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R) have threatened legal action while congressional Republicans like House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) argue people shouldn’t be coerced into vaccines.

Biden also announced that the Transportation Safety Administration will double the fines on travelers who refuse to wear masks. Psaki pointed to that update as one of the “bold, ambitious steps” the administration is taking when asked about support for vaccinations or negative tests for domestic air travel.

“Right now, our focus is on implementing those. Part of that was also doubling fines for people who were not wearing masks on planes – a step that we feel would help keep people safe on flights and reduce the spread,” she said on Thursday. 

The administration recently extended the federal mask mandate for all transportation networks through January. The mask mandate initially had a May expiration date but has been extended twice.

Republican lawmakers have bashed that policy. In July, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced legislation to repeal the travel mask mandate and prohibit the federal government from imposing it. In June, other Republicans led by Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas), introduced a resolution calling for the mandate to be lifted.

The travel industry is already on high alert over the potential of a vaccine mandate for domestic air travel.

U.S. Travel Association president Roger Dow said this week it would be “extraordinarily difficult” to put such a mandate in place.

“[The] challenge is you’ve got upwards of 65 percent of the population vaccinated and you have 35 to 40 percent that for some reason may not be able to be vaccinated but yet they’re willing to do a COVID test and to show that when they walk in the door, that they are COVID-free,” he told reporters on Wednesday.

He said the trade group is “comfortable” with having people traveling to the U.S. being required to be vaccinated as a way to bring back international travel.

Delta Airlines CEO Ed Bastian also said recently he doesn’t see vaccine mandates for domestic travel coming to the U.S. and that trying to figure out which travelers are vaccinated would “actually bottleneck the domestic travel system.” 

Airlines for America, which advocates for all major U.S. airports, said that while no policy change for domestic travel is coming soon, they would be concerned if that changes.

“We have been informed that there is no imminent policy proposal regarding domestic travel, and echo concerns expressed by government about the implementation and enforcement of such a policy. We remain in communication with the Administration and continue to lean into science to guide policies that prioritize the safety and wellbeing of the traveling public,” the group told The Hill in a statement.

The trade group has pushed for the U.S. to allow travelers who are fully vaccinated or present a negative COVID-19 test to travel to the U.S. as a way to lift international travel restrictions. The industry overall has pushed for the administration to ease restrictions on most non-Americans, especially those from the United Kingdom, who are currently barred from traveling to the U.S.

Zients has said the administration is working on a new system for regulating international travel and that it is considering vaccine requirements for foreign nationals traveling to the U.S.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/572791-white-house-debates-vaccines-for-air-travel

Miss. gov: Biden vaccine mandates 'attack' on 'hard-working Americans'

 Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves (R) in an interview on Sunday criticized President Biden's vaccine mandates as an "attack" on "hard-working Americans."

"The question here is not about what we do in Mississippi, it's about what this president is trying to impose on the American worker," Reeves said on CNN's "State of the Union."

"The reality is this is an attack by the president on hard-working Americans and hard-working Mississippians who he wants to choose between getting a jab in their arm and their ability to feed their families," Reeves said.  

Reeves also argued that the mandates were in an effort "to change the political narrative away from Afghanistan and away from the other issues that are driving his poll numbers into ground."

CNN's Jake Tapper noted that Mississippi leads the nation in COVID-19 deaths per capita, adding that if the state were a country, it would rank second in the world for most COVID-19 deaths. 

In response, Reeves said that deaths were "a lagging indicator" and said the state's deaths had declined from spikes earlier in the pandemic. 

Biden earlier this month announced a new rule to require all private employers with 100 or more employees to mandate vaccines or weekly testing. Biden is also dramatically expanding vaccination requirements for health workers. 

https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/572908-gov-tate-reeves-criticizes-vaccine-mandates-despite-overwhelming#bottom-story-socials

Fauci on FDA advisers' booster decision: 'I don't think they made a mistake'

Dr. Anthony Fauci said on Sunday that he thinks that a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel made a "good recommendation" to give COVID-19 booster shots only to older and higher-risk Americans.

"I don't think they made a mistake," Fauci, who serves as President Biden's chief medical adviser, said on CNN's "State of the Union."   

"They came up with a recommendation, which I think is a good recommendation," Fauci said. 

"I am 80, and I'm an elderly person, certainly eligible, I will certainly get a booster," he added. 

Fauci also weighed in on arguments from people who say vaccine mandates should not apply to them after they have already been infected with COVID-19. 

"It is true they do have protection. The one thing we are not aware of yet - and hopefully we'll get that data - is what the durability of protection is," he said.

Fauci added that people should not plan to get their booster shots prior to receiving government approval. 

Late last week, FDA advisers recommended that only select groups receive a booster shot. These recommendations include all vaccinated Americans above age 65.

President Biden earlier had announced plans to give boosters to every American eight months after their initial vaccination. 

https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/572903-fauci-on-fda-advisers-booster-recommendations-i-dont-think-they