Search This Blog

Monday, September 27, 2021

Paratek Gets Added BARDA Funding for Anthrax Treatment

 Additional ~$19M Funding for Expanded Anthrax PEP Development Program

-- BARDA Contract Now Valued at Up to ~$304M

-- Development Milestones Specified for Future Procurements


Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: PRTK) today announced that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), part of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, has awarded an option under the Company’s Project BioShield contract. This option provides additional funding to continue the development of NUZYRA® (omadacycline) under a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Animal Efficacy Rule development program to support a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) to the FDA for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) and treatment of pulmonary anthrax. The additional studies supported by this option increase the value of the BARDA contract by approximately $19 million.

“Our Project BioShield contract creates a comprehensive NUZYRA development program for PEP and treatment of pulmonary anthrax, as described in the original contract,” said Randy Brenner, Chief Development and Regulatory Officer of Paratek. “Paratek has been studying NUZYRA against select biothreat pathogens for over a decade and we are excited to build on the promising in vitro and in vivo animal data and advance the pulmonary anthrax development program for treatment and PEP. This program is particularly important at a time when antimicrobial resistance is both a national security risk as well as a growing threat to global health.”

In December 2019, BARDA awarded Paratek a contract valued at up to approximately $285 million. With the additional development program funding, the contract is now valued at up to approximately $304 million. The contract supports: 1) the development of NUZYRA for both the treatment and PEP of pulmonary anthrax; 2) all FDA post-marketing requirements associated with the initial NUZYRA approval; 3) U.S. onshoring and manufacturing security requirements; and 4) the procurement of up to 10,000 treatment courses of NUZYRA for anthrax.

Biogen used charity giving to illegally boost MS drug sales: Humana lawsuit

 For years, federal prosecutors have gone after drug companies for allegedly using charity contributions as a way to boost sales. Biogen was among the pharma players to ink a federal settlement, but now insurance giant Humana is targeting the company’s charity giving with a new lawsuit. 

In a suit filed in Massachusetts Friday, Humana says Biogen sought to boost sales for multiple sclerosis drugs Tysabri, Avonex and Tecfidera by “seeding” patients with free sample drugs then “sweeping” them onto Medicare and other government insurance programs through its charity giving. 

To do so, Humana says Biogen illegally paid patients’ copays “under the guise of unrestricted charitable giving.” The insurer says Biogen worked with specialty pharmacy Advanced Care Scripts—plus the "nominally charitable foundations” Chronic Disease Fund and The Assistance Fund—to ensure Biogen’s giving would boost its sales. 

Because Biogen's multiple sclerosis drugs cost between $50,000 and $80,000 per year, copays can be thousands of dollars per patient, Humana says. Those copays are a “tiny fraction” of the total cost, meaning drug companies can “earn a major return” from paying those copays. Humana says it spent more than $2.3 billion on Biogen's MS drugs between 2011 and 2019, and it's seeking "recovery of … overpayments."

“Biogen paid the foundations with the intent and understanding that they would use Biogen’s money specifically to cover the copays of patients taking Biogen’s MS Drugs,” Humana said in the lawsuit. “In so doing, Biogen intended that the MS drug patients—but not insurers—avoid the steep prices charged for the drug.” 

A Biogen representative said the company doesn't comment on pending litigation.

The federal government has said it’s illegal for drugmakers to pay Medicare patient copays and has been targeting many of the industry’s top players with lawsuits of its own in recent years. For its part, Biogen agreed to settle similar allegations from federal prosecutors late last year for $22 million.

After Biogen made the deal, a spokesperson said the company “does not agree with the government’s view of the facts and believes that its conduct was appropriate." Biogen believes the "independent charitable assistance programs help patients lead healthier lives."

Meanwhile, the charities at the center of Humana’s lawsuit, the Chronic Disease Fund and The Assistance Fund, have inked federal settlements worth $4 million and $2 million, respectively. Advanced Care Scripts, the specialty pharmacy, also agreed to a $1.4 million settlement with the federal government.

Aside from Biogen, Humana has filed similar lawsuits against Teva and Regeneron, according to reports.  

https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/biogen-used-charity-giving-to-illegally-boost-multiple-sclerosis-drug-sales-humana-lawsuit

Pfizer Starts Study of mRNA-Based Next Generation Flu Vaccine Program

 

  • Influenza results in approximately 5 million cases of severe illness and 290,000 to up to 650,000 deaths worldwide every year,1 with current seasonal vaccines preventing 40% to 60% of the disease in the best-matched seasons 2

  • mRNA-based vaccine design requires only the genetic sequences of the viruses, enabling more flexible, rapid manufacturing and the potential opportunity to improve upon the efficacy of current flu vaccines

Pfizer Inc. (NYSE: PFE) announced today that the first participants have been dosed in a Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a single dose quadrivalent mRNA vaccine against influenza in healthy adults. Pfizer’s mRNA influenza vaccine program is the first in a planned wave of programs leveraging mRNA technology for influenza. Beyond influenza, the company plans to explore mRNA in other respiratory viruses, including medically appropriate vaccines combinations that could provide protection against more than one respiratory virus, as well as expand to develop mRNA technology in oncology, and genetic diseases.

"Since 2018, we have been working to develop a potential mRNA influenza vaccine, driven by our deep understanding of infectious diseases and our extensive experience in researching, developing and implementing new vaccine technologies to help prevent them," said Kathrin U. Jansen, Ph.D., Senior Vice President and Head of Vaccine Research & Development at Pfizer. "The COVID-19 pandemic allowed us to deliver on the immense scientific opportunity of mRNA. Influenza remains an area where we see a need for vaccines which could result in improved efficacy in any given season, and we believe mRNA is the ideal technology to take on this challenge to transform global health outcomes."

Conventional seasonal influenza vaccines are generally developed by growing the virus in chicken eggs or mammalian cells, which are inactivated and processed to be made into a vaccine. This process faces multiple challenges, including producing immunogenic antigens, keeping up with virus strain changes, and alterations in the vaccine antigens during production. With circulating influenza strains continually changing, predicting the best match for the next season’s vaccine is difficult for global health experts as those strains are chosen more than six months before the start of the influenza season that they target in the Northern Hemisphere.

Incyte turns to in-licensing

 Dealmaking felt like a more pressing need for Incyte in the wake of the approval of Opzelura by the FDA last week. The topical Jak inhibitor’s label was unexpectedly restrictive, likely limiting its sales, leaving the company in need of other growth drivers. Thus today's deal with Syndax Pharmaceuticals is timely. Incyte is paying $117m, plus a $35m equity investment, for worldwide commercial rights to axatilimab, Syndax’s anti-CSF-1R monoclonal antibody. Under the terms the two groups have a fifty-fifty profit share in the US, with Syndax getting double-digit royalties on sales outside the country. Axatilimab is currently in a pivotal phase 2 trial, Agave-201, for chronic graft-versus-host disease, with combination trials with a Jak inhibitor planned. The partners also intend to expand its use into idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), with Syndax funding initial work here and Incyte able to opt in to co-funding late-stage development. This is the second GVHD deal this month, following the $1.9bn acquisition of Kadmon by Sanofi. That deal was largely about Kadmon’s approved graft-versus-host medicine, Rezurock, which has completed a phase 2 trial in IPF. Since then, though, development in fibrosis seems to have lapsed. 

Forecast WW sales in GVHD ($m)The GVHD outlookRezurock (Sanofi*)Jakafi (Incyte)Temcell HS (Mesoblast/JCR Pharmaceuticals)Axatilimab (Syndax Pharmaceuticals)Alzumab (Equillium)ALPN-101 (Alpine Immune Sciences)Thymoglobulin (Sanofi)Itacitinib (Incyte)2020202120222023202420252026050010001500Evaluate2020 Jakafi (Incyte): 97

*Forecasts predate Sanofi's acquisition of Kadmon, Rezurock's originator, and therefore come from analysts covering Kadmon rather than Sanofi.  


https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/snippets/incyte-turns-licensing

Aslan fails to roar with atopic dermatitis data

 Dupixent has set such a high bar in atopic dermatitis anyone coming for its crown had better come prepared. This could be why questions around Aslan Pharmaceuticals' trial design and results contributed to a 31% fall in the group’s share price. In the phase 1 trial a 600mg dose of ASLAN004 showed a statistically significant 65% change in skin clearance from baseline at week 8. However, there were concerns about the removal of nine patients from the original intent-to-treat population and the study using a one-sided p value. Perhaps more worrying was that the number of patients achieving a IGA score of 0/1, ie clear or almost clear skin, was not significant at 48.3% versus 15.4% for placebo (p=0.107); this is important as the IGA 0/1 score is used for US approval. Arguably the sample size of 29 – reduced from 38 – was not powered to show a definitive result, but the result also appeared to show reduced efficacy; in March 22% of patients achieved IGA or 0/1, compared with 0% on placebo. Aslan is looking to begin a phase 2 trial before the end of the year and one concern is that what looks like waning efficacy could be exacerbated with larger numbers.

ASLAN004 phase 1 trial
Endpoint (8 weeks)RITT (n=29)ITT (n=38)
 600mgPlacebop-value1600mgPlacebop-value1
 (n=16)(n=13) (n=22)(n=16) 
Mean % change from baseline in EASI-64.9-27.20.021-61.3-31.90.023
EASI-50 (%)81.330.80.00877.337.50.016
EASI-75 (%)68.815.40.0055012.50.018
EASI-90 (%)37.515.40.18327.312.50.245
IGA 0/1 (%)43.815.40.10731.818.80.301
Mean % change from baseline in peak pruritus-38.6-15.30.051-37.1-15.70.032
RITT = revised intent to treat; p-value1 (one-sided p-value). Source: Company announcement.

https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/snippets/aslan-fails-roar-atopic-dermatitis-data

Stimulant Reduces Apathy in Alzheimer's

 Treatment with methylphenidate (Ritalin), a stimulant approved for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) and narcolepsy, led to a small to medium reduction in apathy in people with Alzheimer's disease, the phase III ADMET 2 trial showed.

At 6 months, methylphenidate 10 mg twice daily led to a larger decrease on the 12-point Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) apathy scale compared with placebo, with a mean difference of -1.25 points (95% CI -2.03 to -0.47, P=0.002), equivalent to a Cohen d of 0.365, reported Jacobo Mintzer, MD, MBA, of the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center in Charleston, South Carolina, and co-authors.

This effect was first seen 2 months after starting treatment and was sustained over 6 months, the researchers wrote in JAMA Neurology.

On the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC), a co-primary endpoint, methylphenidate did not show a statistically significant difference over placebo but trended favorably, the researchers noted.

There were no treatment differences in cognitive measures, or in activities of daily living or quality-of-life scores. No new safety signals emerged with methylphenidate treatment.

"Methylphenidate offers a treatment approach providing a modest but potentially clinically significant benefit for patients and caregivers," Mintzer and colleagues wrote. "Clinicians should be aware of the small to medium treatment effects sizes and the lack of effect on activities of daily living."

Apathy affects anywhere from 20% to 90% of people in the dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease, noted Carolyn Fredericks, MD, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, in an accompanying editorial. "Despite the severity of apathy's impact on patients with dementia and their caregivers, it is notoriously difficult to treat, and no therapies to date have proven to be effective," she wrote.

"The magnitude of the effect of methylphenidate reported in this trial is likely to be of clinical significance for many patients and represents the first phase III randomized clinical trial showing efficacy of any treatment for apathy in Alzheimer's disease," Fredericks pointed out.

"While methylphenidate will not be an option for those individuals with medical or psychiatric contraindications to stimulants, the present study demonstrates that it is generally safe and well tolerated for the target population," she added.

Two smaller trials of shorter duration, including the first ADMET study, showed that methylphenidate led to positive outcomes in treating apathy in Alzheimer's disease, with minimal adverse events.

In ADMET 2, Mintzer and co-authors studied 200 patients clinically diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, mild to moderate cognitive impairment, and frequent or severe apathy from August 2016 to July 2020, assigning 99 participants to methylphenidate 10 mg twice daily and 101 people to placebo.

People with major depression or significant agitation, aggression, delusions, or hallucinations were excluded from the study. Participants had a median age of 76, and two-thirds were men.

Two co-primary outcomes were prespecified: mean change in NPI apathy score and odds of improved ADCS-CGIC rating, both assessed from baseline to 6 months. A significant result for either outcome indicated efficacy.

NPI apathy scores had the largest decrease in the first 100 days, favoring methylphenidate (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.19-3.91, P=0.01).

At 6 months, ADCS-CGIC ratings improved for 43.8% in the methylphenidate group and 35.2% in the placebo group (OR 1.90, 95% CI 0.95-3.84, P=0.07).

More people in the methylphenidate group reported weight loss of more than 7% during the trial. Of 17 serious adverse events that occurred during the study, none were related to the study drug. No significant differences in the safety profile emerged between treatment groups.

"Many study participants were taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other antidepressants, and/or memantine [Namenda] at the time of participation; the authors found no confounding effects of these medications on the study's primary outcomes," Fredericks observed.

"Apathy in the context of Alzheimer's disease often occurs without concomitant depressed mood and is not simply a symptom of depression," she wrote. "That said, depression is also common both in older adulthood and as a neuropsychiatric symptom of Alzheimer's disease, and it can be difficult to untangle which patients are experiencing Alzheimer's disease-related apathy, Alzheimer's disease-related depression, or co-occurring late-life major depression."

ADMET 2 has limitations, Fredericks noted: it did not assess whether methylphenidate meaningfully relieved caregiver burden and relied on "notoriously nonspecific" clinical criteria for Alzheimer's diagnoses, not biomarkers. Future studies should assess methylphenidate treatment on specific forms of apathy, she added.


Disclosures

Funding was provided by the National Institute on Aging.

Mintzer reported being an advisor for Praxis Bioresearch and Cerevel Therapeutics. Other authors reported relationships with NIH, BioXcel Therapeutics, Cerevel, Praxis, Eisai, Kondor Pharma, Eli Lilly, Vaccinex, Functional Neuromodulation, Alzheimer's Therapeutic Research Institute, Alzheimer's Clinical Trials Consortium, Richman Family Precision Medicine Center of Excellence in Alzheimer's Disease, Gerson Lehrman Group, SVB Leerink, Cerevance, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Sunovion, FDA, Roche, Ono Pharmaceutical, Biogen, Biohaven, Novartis, Janssen, Genentech, Merck, VA, Cadent Therapeutics, Syneos, Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Athira, Alzheon, MapLight Therapeutics, Premier Healthcare Solutions, and IQVIA.

Pacific Biosciences started at Buy by Canaccord

 Target $45

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=PACB