Search This Blog

Thursday, December 14, 2023

Drug Overdose Deaths Among Seniors Highlight of Senate Hearing

 Among other solutions, educational campaigns along with expanding access to residential rehab programs to Medicare beneficiaries could mitigate the growing trend of drug overdose deaths in seniors, experts said during a hearing

opens in a new tab or window of the Senate Special Committee on Aging on Thursday.

Overdose deaths among seniors quadrupled from 2002 to 2021, said Keith Humphreys, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, California, citing a research letteropens in a new tab or window he co-authored in JAMA Psychiatry.

Looking at the broader picture, one in approximately 370 deaths among older adults was the result of intentional or unintentional overdose, a rate lower than that of the working age population, he noted. Still, the fourfold increase is troubling, and early CDC data have indicated a 14% uptick in deaths among this population.

"So, the problem seems to be getting worse," he said.

While one in eight of these overdose deaths was intentional, the primary driver of these trends are "unintentional deaths in illicit markets," typically involving cocaine, methamphetamine, and especially fentanyl, Humphreys explained.

In his written testimony, Humphreys said that potential reasons for this increase in overdose deaths included a rise in pharmaceutical products broadly -- approximately 54% of seniors take four or more prescription drugs, and in some cases, neither the senior nor their physician are aware of the adverse interactions of these medications.

Furthermore, as people age, their bodies' ability to "metabolize and tolerate" drugs changes, raising their risk of overdose, as well as other problems such as falls, he noted.

He also pointed out that different generations "carry substance patterns with them through their lives." The teenagers and young adults who attended Woodstock are now Medicare beneficiaries. As these Baby Boomers move into retirement, clinicians should expect more drug use among older Americans.

Witnesses, including Humphreys, acknowledged that Congress has begun to tackle this issue. In 2018, Congress passed the SUPPORT Actopens in a new tab or window, which gave Medicare beneficiaries access to community-based clinics that provide methadone treatment. And in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023opens in a new tab or window, Congress authorized Medicare to cover mental health counselors and intensive outpatient treatment.

As Deborah Steinberg, JD, senior health policy attorney for the Legal Action Center based in Washington, D.C., pointed out, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services also recently increased Medicare reimbursement rates for certain addiction and mental health services, including office-based substance use disorder treatment, to help boost provider participation.

Still, there's more work to be done, witnesses said.

For example, Humphreys noted, Congress could build on the SUPPORT Act reforms by also making residential treatment programs Medicare eligible.

It could also extend protections of the 2008 Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act -- a bill that required insurers' benefits for mental health and substance use to be comparable to all other medical benefits -- which have been afforded to employees of small, medium, and large companies; those on the state exchanges; and most Medicaid enrollees, to include seniors, who are currently excluded.

"Remarkably, the Medicare program, the standard setter for other types of insurance, is not subject to this critical civil rights law," with certain exceptions, Steinberg said.

This lack of parity pushes the cost burden onto patients, clinicians, and states and to the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund when conditions are left untreated, she added. "We recommend Congress apply the Parity Act to all parts of Medicare."

Humphreys noted that the Parity Act currently does not apply to Part A of Medicare -- inpatient hospital care, skilled nursing facility care, and other services -- or to "fast-growing" Medicare Advantage plans.

"Giving everyone in Medicare the same parity protections that almost every other American enjoys would increase access both to the care of substance use disorder, as well as the mental health problems that often co-occur with them," he said.

James Carroll, JD, former director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, also noted that while there are educational campaigns highlighting the dangers of synthetic drugs and fentanyl-laced fake pills for children and teenagers, "our seniors need to receive this message too: 'One pill can kill.'"opens in a new tab or window

Finally, William Stauffer, executive director of the Pennsylvania Recovery Organizations Alliance and a person in recovery, said that it's important to look at the COVID pandemic and its relationship to the problem of loneliness.

"A lot of aging adults in recovery, they're looking for purpose ... If we did something like create an older adult recovery community corp to pair older adults in recovery to others who need help, we'll be saving a lot of lives. Even those who are in the helping roles. Because we all want hope, purpose, and connection," Stauffer said.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/washington-watch/107876

Aadi Interim Results from Anti-Tumor Trial Inconclusive

 "Our tumor agnostic PRECISION1 trial is designed to elucidate the impact of nab-sirolimus on cancers expressing inactivating alterations of TSC1 or TSC2, regardless of tumor type. We are encouraged by the preliminary data from this pre-planned analysis and by the responses and clinical benefit demonstrated in advanced cancer patients who have failed an average of three prior lines of therapy," said Loretta Itri, MD, CMO of Aadi Bioscience. "Full enrollment in the trial is expected by the spring of 2024 and we believe we are on track to generate compelling clinical evidence for advancing nab-sirolimus toward potential expansion of the current registration, bringing this innovative therapeutic agent to more cancer patients."

The interim analysis includes data from the first third of trial participants (n=40) with a minimum of 4.5 months of follow-up, including investigator-assessed response and safety analyzed separately in each of the TSC1 and TSC2 arms. Nine different tumor types were enrolled in the TSC1 arm and 13 tumor types were enrolled in the TSC2 arm.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aadi-bioscience-reports-interim-results-from-precision1-trial-of-nab-sirolimus-demonstrating-anti-tumor-activity-in-solid-tumors-with-tsc1-or-tsc2-inactivating-alterations-302016094.html

West Virginia Secretary Of State Insists CIA Robbed Trump Of 2020 Election Win

 by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

West Virginia Secretary of State Mac Warner, a Republican who's running for the state governorship, said he's convinced the 2020 presidential election was "stolen" and that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is to blame.

Mr. Warner, a 23-year veteran of the U.S. Army, made the remarks during a Dec. 7 debate held by Metro News among candidates for West Virginia's 2024 gubernatorial election.

During the debate, the candidates discussed a range of issues, including tax cuts and economic growth. At one point in the debate, Mr. Warner was asked by the moderator whether he believes former President Donald Trump is "correct when he says—continues to say—the election was stolen."

Mr. Warner replied in the affirmative—and explained his rationale for siding with President Trump's version of events around the 2020 election.

"The election was stolen," Mr. Warner said. "And it was stolen by the CIA."

'Sell a Lie to The American People'

Mr. Warner went on to allege that former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell "colluded" with Secretary of State Antony Blinken (who at the time was advising the Biden presidential campaign) to manage the production of a letter signed by 51 former senior intelligence officials that cast doubt on the veracity of the contents of the infamous Hunter Biden laptop by framing it as Russian disinformation.

"He colluded with Antony Blinken to sell a lie to the American people ... for the very purpose of throwing the presidential election," Mr. Warner said.

Polling suggests that if voters had been aware of the laptop's contents, some would have voted differently, with a potentially different outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Further, earlier this year, two Republican-controlled House committees published a report alleging the CIA's Prepublication Classification Review Board (PCRB) reviewed and approved the letter, with the report also alleging that a PCRB employee may even have recruited signatories.

Mr. Blinken has denied playing any role in the letter, and the CIA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The function of the PCRB is to ensure current and former CIA employees aren't disclosing classified information in any materials they may release publicly, such as articles or books.

'All The Classic Earmarks'

The Republican report, which was released on  10, 2023, accuses former CIA officials of playing an active role in recruiting signatories for the letter that discredited the Hunter Biden laptop reports by framing them as having had "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation."

The report alleges that Mr. Blinken, who was working for the Biden campaign at the time, contacted Mr. Morell on Oct. 17, 2020, to discuss the letter. Mr. Morell reportedly agreed to the plan and actively recruited other signatories.

Two days after discussing the letter with Mr. Blinken, Mr. Morell reportedly sent a final draft of the letter to the PCRB for review on Oct. 19, 2020. Mr. Morell told the CIA board "[t]his is a rush job, as it need to get out as soon as possible," per the report.

The letter's signatories hoped to give then-candidate Joe Biden a "talking point" to defend against the Hunter Biden laptop reporting during his final presidential debate with President Trump on Oct. 22, 2020, the report indicates.

One of the signatories of the letter, former CIA analyst David Cariens, told congressional investigators that his book was up for consideration by the PCRB when Mr. Morell and other former intelligence officials were soliciting other signatories.

Mr. Cariens told investigators that a CIA employee affiliated with the PCRB informed him of the intelligence community letter and asked if he would sign it. Mr. Cariens said, "The person in charge of reviewing the book" called to tell him that it had been approved without any changes required and then told him about the letter.

If an employee of the PCRB were, in fact, involved in recruiting signatories for the letter, that could be problematic as there are rules against federal employees getting involved in political campaigns. For instance, the Hatch Act prohibits federal employees from using government resources to help a partisan political campaign.

"Even Morell testified that such an action by a CIA employee would be 'inappropriate,'" the Republican report states.

Mr. Blinken has denied playing any part in the letter.

"With regard to that letter, I didn't—it wasn't my idea, didn't ask for it, didn't solicit it. And I think the testimony that the former deputy director of the CIA, Mike Morrell, put forward confirms that," Mr. Blinken told Fox News in a May 1 interview.

While Mr. Morell's testimony indicates that a phone call he received from Mr. Blinken didn't explicitly or implicitly request the letter, he also insisted that Mr. Blinken's call was "absolutely" the trigger that motivated him to become involved in the letter's production.

Post-election research suggested that as many as one in five Biden voters may have voted differently had they been aware of reports about the Hunter Biden laptop, which were actively suppressed on social media thanks in part to the impact of the letter.

'I Say I Won'

Meanwhile, President Trump recently revealed what went into his decision to challenge the results of the 2020 election.

In an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” the former president spoke about what went into his decision.

"I was listening to different people. And when I added it all up, the election was rigged," he said. "It was my decision."

In the interview, President Trump was asked why he decided to challenge the elections even after "the most senior lawyers in your own administration and on your campaign" told him he lost.

"I didn't respect them as lawyers," President Trump said, adding that former Attorney General Bill Barr had allegedly been afraid of an impeachment inquiry and acted to avoid that, and many others he had hired based on recommendations. "But I did respect others."

"It's my choice," he continued, adding, "I happen to know that the election was rigged."

"I say I won the election," he clarified.

Catherine Yang and Ryan Morgan contributed to this report. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/west-virginia-secretary-state-insists-cia-robbed-trump-2020-election-win

DOJ’s latest ploy to get Biden re-elected: Get Trump in the Supreme Court

 The Supreme Court should reject special counsel Jack Smith’s latest ploy to short-circuit the 2024 election.

Smith petitioned the Supreme Court this week to intervene prematurely in the trial proceedings against Donald Trump.

Smith charged Trump in August with attempting Jan. 6, 2021, to block the peaceful transfer of power.

He alleged Trump defrauded the United States, obstructed Congress and deprived voters of their constitutional rights in his efforts to persuade Vice President Mike Pence to suspend the electoral-vote count and in giving an inflammatory speech before a crowd that then attacked the Capitol.

Federal District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan scheduled the trial to begin March 4, 2024, one day before the Super Tuesday primaries.

In response, Trump claimed that as president, he enjoyed immunity from criminal prosecution when acting at the “outer perimeter” of his official responsibilities.

He also raised a second defense: that he cannot be prosecuted for the same conduct for which he was impeached by the House and acquitted by the Senate.

Chutkan rejected that claim.

In the regular course of criminal proceedings, which apply to 99.9999% of all cases, Trump would have the right to appeal to the DC Circuit, often described as the second-most-important court in the land, and then petition the Supreme Court.

But rather than allow normal procedures to run, Smith has filed a self-described “extraordinary request” urging the Supreme Court to bypass the appeals court and immediately review Trump’s immunity claim — a tactic unseen since the Nixon Watergate Tapes case, to which Smith compared Trump’s prosecution.

Smith’s petition seeks to embroil the justices in the Trump trials and double down on the politicization of their timing.

There is no doubt the question at stake — did President Trump’s conduct after the election and culminating on Jan. 6 fall within the scope of his official powers or did it amount to a crime? — is of vital importance.

Should the Supreme Court decide this issue, which might normally take a year or two, the opinion would become one of the most important ever on the presidency and the Constitution’s separation of powers.

But the special counsel nowhere explains why this case should leapfrog the DC federal appeals court, which regularly resolves controversies over the executive branch, the separations of powers and even immunity.

The justices would benefit from a careful opinion from the lower appeals court, just as it does in virtually every case it hears.

Smith says it’s of “paramount” and “imperative” importance these matters be resolved quickly.

But he nowhere explains the need for speed.

Smith’s bull rush only makes sense as an effort to get to trial before the election.

Smith knows any appeal will delay the trial because all proceedings effectively halt during the pendency of this appeal, as Judge Chutkan recognized Wednesday when she granted Trump’s motion to suspend the trial.

If he can persuade the high court to pluck the case prematurely from the lower courts, it might issue a decision within two to three months (as the Watergate Tapes court did in 1974), start a trial by the early summer and reach a verdict smack in the middle (conveniently for Smith) of the presidential election.

But if the justices allow the Trump immunity issue to proceed normally, a verdict would be unlikely until after the November elections.

Prosecutors should not pursue cases that will directly affect federal elections, but that would be unavoidable if Smith has his way.

Trump remains the presumptive frontrunner for the Republican nomination and voting will start soon with the Iowa caucus in January.

There is broad dissatisfaction with President Biden and widespread concern about his advanced age, and the latest swing-state polls indicate Biden is falling behind Trump.

With the trial dates of the other three pending criminal cases against Trump up in the air, Smith seems desperate to get to trial — the one most likely to capture the public’s attention.

He would like to see Trump a convicted felon, perhaps sitting in a prison cell, by Election Day.

If Smith cannot move forward soon, Trump might even be free to campaign rather than sit in courtrooms.

Smith’s tactics, however, may backfire.

Every time Trump gets indicted or suffers a legal setback, his poll numbers rise.

Trump has effectively convinced broad swaths of the public he is being singled out for attack because of who he is and who he represents.

Nothing in the Constitution prohibits a convicted felon from running for or serving as president.

His supporters are crying “election interference” on the ground the Biden Justice Department is trying to imprison Biden’s primary political opponent.

Those who accused Trump of politicizing the Justice Department to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden’s influence-peddling schemes are sitting on the sidelines while Trump faces multiple prosecutions by his opponent’s DOJ.

The larger point: Neither the special counsel nor Judge Chutkan, who has set an unreasonable trial schedule, trust the American people to decide for themselves whether Trump violated his duty Jan. 6.

Instead of allowing Americans to render their verdict at the ballot box, they want to decide Trump’s fitness for office in the courtroom.

The Supreme Court can pull the courts and prosecutors out of politics, make a stand for fairly applying the law and defend our institutions by rejecting Smith and his emergency appeal.

John Malcolm is vice president of the Institute for Constitutional Government and director of the Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center and Simon Center. John Yoo is the Emanuel S. Heller professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution.

https://nypost.com/2023/12/13/opinion/the-dojs-latest-ploy-to-get-biden-re-elected-get-trump-in-the-supreme-court/

Thousands of migrants spotted trying to hop train to US border

 Countless migrants have been lining the tracks of a freight train line headed to the US through Eagle Pass, Texas, apparently hoping to hop onboard and hitch a ride to the border, according to reports.

The migrants were filmed near the Mexican city of Piedras Negras, according to shocking footage obtained by Fox News, located just across the border from the major US port of entry in Eagle Pass.

A seemingly endless line of migrants laden with luggage and children raised their hands and cheered as the train rumbled by at a steady clip. No migrants were seen jumping onboard in the footage.

Railway hopping has become a common strategy for migrants making the long treks from their homes in South and Central America to get to the US border quicker and with considerably less effort than walking

It has become so commonplace that in September Mexico’s largest freight line, Ferromex, halted operations on 60 northbound trains due to “unprecedented” numbers of migrants climbing onboard to hitch rides.

The practice saw an uptick in September, Ferromex said, and even led to “half-dozen regrettable cases of injury or death” among migrants.

The massive line of migrants disappeared around the curve of the train tracks
The massive line of migrants disappeared around the curve of the train tracksFox News

Eagle Pass Port of Entry has also been forced to reduce its normal border operations in the face of the migrant surge.

On December 4, one of the two bridges crossing the Rio Grande into the US from Mexico was closed so that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers could consolidate their resources in the face of record-setting migrant arrivals.

In addition to the Eagle Pass closure, three other ports of entry across California and Arizona have also been closed “indefinitely.”

CBP figures from October alone showed 52,000 migrants had presented themselves to agents at border crossings seeking entry into the US — but that an additional 189,000 had been encountered trying to enter illegally along the hundreds of miles of remote desert border between stations.

Migrants have been hitching rides on trains as they work their way to the border from South and Central America
Migrants have been hitching rides on trains as they work their way to the border from South and Central AmericaREUTERS

The fiscal year 2023, which ended on September 30, saw the highest number of people apprehended trying to cross into the U.S. since officials first started keeping track in 1960 — a staggering 2.4 million people.

Those numbers have showed no signs of slowing.

On December 5, a day after the Eagle Pass closure began, 12,000 people were encountered trying to cross the southern border — a single-day record.

https://nypost.com/2023/12/14/news/huge-line-of-migrants-spotted-trying-to-hop-train-into-u-s/

Mom uses controversial tracking app Life 360 to catch son having sex with teacher

 A North Carolina mom used a popular but controversial tracking app to catch her son having sex with his high school teacher in her car, according to reports.

The unidentified parent had installed Life 360 on her son’s device — and grew suspicious after she was alerted to his absence from rugby practice.

Instead, the app curiously showed that he was idling near a local park.

The mother drove to the location in Mecklenburg and found him in flagrante delicto with 26-year-old South Mecklenburg High School teacher Gabriela Cartaya-Neufeld, according to WSOC.

After taking several pictures of the educator’s vehicle and license plate, the shocked mother called police to the scene and Cartaya-Neufeld was taken into custody.

The parent, police said, had heard rumors of her son’s illicit relationship previously and was already on high alert before the telltale missed practice.

Cartaya-Neufeld, a science teacher, trysted with the teen in her car, inside his mother’s home and at her own residence, prosecutors said.

Gabriele Cartaya-Neufeld
Gabriela Cartaya-Neufeld was allegedly caught having sex with a high school student.MECKLENBURG COUNTY JAIL

Rumors of the illicit union had also been flying around the school for months prior to the arrest, prompting administrators to question both the teen and his teacher, the district attorney said at Cartaya-Neufeld’s arraignment.

The educator was hit with five counts of felony sexual activity with a student by a teacher.

She was initially taken to the Mecklenburg County jail late last month but has since made bail.

Life 360 — which counts Mark Zuckerberg’s sister Randi as a board member — has become increasingly popular with “helicopter” parents hoping to monitor their kids.

The technology can ping a parent if the device holder is inside a speeding car, or has left a pre-designated area.

Life 360
The victim’s mother used the Life 360 tracking app to catch the pair.Life360/Facebook

Life 360 has roughly 50 million active monthly users and was expected to pull in earnings of $300 million this year.

But critics have questioned the app’s all-encompassing and sometimes oppressive presence — and data collection practices.

Human trafficking activists have suggested victims are being tracked using the app, while company representatives have cast those instances as outliers.

Teens and young adults whose parents use the app have also cried foul, with entire reddit threads dedicated to how to fool or disable it.

https://nypost.com/2023/12/14/news/mom-uses-tracking-app-backed-by-mark-zuckebergs-sister-to-catch-son-having-sex-with-teacher/

Cardinal started at Underweight by Wells Fargo

 Target $96

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=CAH&p=d