Search This Blog

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

eHealth Q2 revenue tops estimates, guidance raised

 eHealth , Inc. (NASDAQ:EHTH) saw its shares surge 29% after the online health insurance marketplace reported second-quarter revenue that significantly exceeded analyst expectations and raised its full-year guidance.

The company posted Q2 revenue of $60.8 million, well above the consensus estimate of $49.94 million, despite an 8% YoY decline from $65.9 million in the same quarter last year. Adjusted earnings per share came in at -$0.98, beating analyst expectations of -$1.19 by $0.21.

eHealth’s strong performance was bolstered by positive net adjustment revenue of $17.8 million, up from $11.5 million in Q2 2024. The company’s shares skyrocketed following the results as investors responded positively to the revenue beat and improved outlook.

"eHealth delivered a strong second quarter, once again exceeding our revenue and profitability expectations and demonstrating our ability to adapt to an evolving macro and regulatory landscape," said CEO Fran Soistman.

The company raised its full-year 2025 guidance, now expecting total revenue between $525 million and $565 million, up from its previous forecast of $510 million to $550 million. The midpoint of the new guidance range ($545 million) represents a significant increase from the previous midpoint.

eHealth also improved its GAAP net income guidance to between $5 million and $26 million, compared to its prior range of -$10 million to $15 million. Additionally, adjusted EBITDA is now projected to be between $55 million and $75 million, up from the previous range of $35 million to $60 million.

The company achieved a 24% reduction in variable marketing spend within its Medicare segment compared to Q2 2024, while its GAAP net loss improved to $17.4 million from $28 million in the year-ago quarter.

Looking ahead, eHealth is preparing for the Medicare Annual Enrollment Period, which it anticipates will be marked by elevated consumer shopping activity due to recent industry developments.

https://www.investing.com/news/earnings/ehealth-shares-soar-as-q2-revenue-tops-estimates-guidance-raised-93CH-4174117

Myriad Genetics (MYGN) Reports Revenue Growth, Strategic Shifts

 

  • Myriad Genetics (MYGNFinancial) reported solid Q2 2025 revenue of $213 million, fueled by strong growth in MyRisk HCT oncology tests.
  • Wall Street analysts predict an average price target of $7.19, suggesting significant upside potential.
  • GuruFocus estimates indicate a substantial potential upside based on the GF Value metric.

Strong Quarter Boosted by Oncology Test Demand

Myriad Genetics (MYGN) achieved impressive revenue of $213 million in Q2 2025, marking a robust performance largely driven by a 14% rise in the volume of MyRisk HCT oncology tests. The GeneSight test also contributed with a 5% increase in demand. Despite a 7% dip in prenatal test volumes, Myriad Genetics remains strategically committed to enhancing growth and profitability within the Cancer Care Continuum.

Wall Street Analysts' Perspective

Analyst projections present an intriguing outlook for Myriad Genetics Inc (MYGNFinancial), with 13 analysts providing a one-year average price target of $7.19. Price targets range from a high estimate of $18.00 to a low of $3.50, illustrating a considerable variance in expectations. The average target suggests a potential upside of 85.85% from the current stock price of $3.87.

Planet Fitness stock rises as Jefferies reiterates Buy on strong comps

 Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) stock gained after Jefferies reiterated its Buy rating and $175.00 price target, citing the fitness chain’s reaccelerating same-store sales and expanding margins.

The company reported same-store sales growth of 8.2%, exceeding consensus estimates of 5.9% and marking 16 consecutive quarters of mid-single-digit or higher comparable sales. Jefferies noted that the White Card price increase continues to drive comp performance and should keep sales "stronger for longer."

Total membership grew approximately 5.6% year-over-year to 20.8 million, with management reporting that the High School Summer Pass program is outpacing last year’s sign-ups. Gen Z remains the fastest-growing membership segment, which Jefferies believes will be a key driver of fitness industry growth.

EBITDA margins expanded by approximately 100 basis points to 43.3%, surpassing consensus estimates of 42.8%, with improvements in both Franchise and Corporate Club margins. The analyst highlighted that reaccelerating comps are driving leverage as the White Card price increase flows through to the bottom line. 

Planet Fitness raised its same-store sales guidance to the high end of its previous 5-6% range while maintaining other metrics, which Jefferies views as "beatable" and demonstrating that management "has a great handle on the numbers." With a current ratio of 2.1, the company maintains strong liquidity to support its growth initiatives. 

In other recent news, Planet Fitness Inc . reported its second-quarter 2025 earnings, surpassing analyst expectations for both earnings per share (EPS) and revenue. The company posted an EPS of $0.86, which was above the forecasted $0.79. Additionally, Planet Fitness reported revenue of $340.9 million, exceeding the anticipated $329.56 million.

https://www.investing.com/news/analyst-ratings/planet-fitness-stock-rises-as-jefferies-reiterates-buy-on-strong-comps-93CH-4174155

Trump says 'great progress' made in envoy Witkoff's meeting with Putin

 President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff made "great progress" in his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Trump updated some of Washington's European allies after the meeting.

"My Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, just had a highly productive meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

"Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come," he added.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/trump-says-great-progress-made-171643929.html

Report of Patient Deaths Sends Agios Shares Seesawing

 

While the deaths occurred in patients who had been treated with Agios’ anemia treatment Pyrukynd, the biotech insisted in an SEC filing midday Monday that the drug’s risk-benefit profile remains unchanged.

Shares of Massachusetts-based Agios Pharmaceuticals were put through the wringer on Monday after the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System revealed four deaths in patients who had taken its anemia drug Pyrukynd.

Leerink analysts flagged a 23% dip at the stock’s lowest point, with share prices hitting $26.75 at market opening Monday before rebounding to $36.16 by the closing bell, a 3% increase from its closing price last Friday. In pre-market trading Tuesday, Agios shares have dipped 2%

Agios filed an SEC document on Monday to address the four deaths, which were first made public by a securities analyst who filed a Freedom of Information Act request to the FDA’s safety database, to which Agios had reported these deaths. In its regulatory filing, Agios reassured investors that the deaths have “not altered the established benefit-risk profile” for Pyrukynd.

Two of the deaths were in older patients: one in a 61-year-old man and another in a 93-year-old woman, both of whom were being treated for pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency. Agios reported these cases to the FAERS on June 28, 2024 and July 17, 2025, respectively, according to the Leerink analysts.

The last two fatalities were in much younger women, a 28-year-old and a 26-year-old, who had sickle cell disease and were being treated with Pyrukynd under compassionate use. The latter of these two cases was reported to the FDA on July 15 this year.

Leerink said that these latter two deaths are “concerning given the young age of the patients.”

But after following up with Agios, the analysts learned that these two younger patients were actually the same person. “The 28-year-old patient was actually a duplicate of the 26-year-old patient which was incorrectly entered into the database,” the Leerink note read, adding that this has in turn “largely offsets our concerns” that these deaths represent “a heightened mortality risk of Pyrukynd.”

Despite Agios’ clarifications, “it is difficult to fully dismiss the impact of the safety concerns” on an upcoming PDUFA data for Pyrukynd, Leerink added. Agios is proposing Pyrukynd for the treatment of patients with alpha- or beta-thalassemia regardless of their dependence on transfusions. The FDA is expected to release its verdict on Sept. 7. The drug was first approved in 2022 for adults with hemolytic anemia with PK deficiency.

Patient deaths have been in the news in recent months, the most visible of which have been the three mortalities linked to Sarepta’s gene therapy portfolio: two to its Duchenne muscular dystrophy product Elevidys and one to an investigational limb-girdle muscular dystrophy candidate. Then, late last week, Allogene Therapeutics likewise reported a patient death in a Phase II study of its CAR T therapy cemacabtagene ansegedleucel, though the fatality was ultimately linked to ALLO-647, an anti-CD52 antibody used as an immunosuppressive treatment to prepare patients for the cell therapy.

https://www.biospace.com/drug-development/report-of-patient-deaths-sends-agios-shares-seesawing

Building Pharma’s Farm System: Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, More Invest in the Future

 

While a substantial portion of pipeline assets are externally sourced, many Big Pharmas are tapping into incubators and venture funds to uncover cutting-edge scientific trends, determine their future focus points and even carve out a niche in an emerging geographical hotspot.

In the dog days of summer, many baseball fans are thinking about the depth of their team’s farm system, whether they have what it takes to win it all this season, and in seasons to come. Biopharma companies aren’t much different—they have farm systems too, in the form of incubators and venture arms, where they strive to uncover exciting science and suss out where the therapeutic puck—if you’ll allow the mixed sports metaphor—is going next.

While a recent study by McKinsey & Company found that 45% of drugs in the pipelines of 20 large pharmaceutical companies were externally sourced in 2020 and M&A action ticked up late this spring, several pharmas are also tapping this incubator model—and helping to support fledgling, like-minded startups at the same time.

At Eli Lilly’s Lilly Gateway Labs, “at least half of our companies are doing things outside of our core strategy,” Julie Gilmore, vice president and global head of Lilly Gateway Labs and Catalyze360 Portfolio Management, told BioSpace on the sidelines of the BIO 2025 conference in June.

The same is true at Boehringer Ingelheim, where the German pharma’s venture fund “tend[s] to enlarge the scope, invest into areas where the Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation is not active, or . . . not active yet,” Detlev Mennerich, global head of the Boehringer Ingelheim Venture Fund, told BioSpace at BIO.

Boehringer’s development arm attempts to forecast its disease areas of interest five to 10 years out, DeWire said, “and a lot of times, the leading edge of that is things that the Venture Fund has already anticipated.”

And Lilly and Boehringer are hardly alone. Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Novartis and AstraZeneca all also have extensive incubator programs, comprising startups focused on therapeutics, medtech and consumer products.

Neuro Ahead for Boehringer

Since its creation in 2010, the Boehringer Ingelheim Venture Fund has invested in over 70 companies. The fund spearheads the innovation, invests in the concepts “to mature them into prototypes” and then Scott DeWire, Boehringer’s global head of business development and licensing, steps in and connects with the companies, Mennerich explained. “Some of these companies end up in the BI family and some have been sold to the market.”

To date, the fund has exited 13 companies—about half going to Boehringer and half to other pharmas or healthcare firms. Currently, the portfolio includes more than 40 companies working in autoimmunity, oncology, regenerative medicine, digital health and more.

Mennerich sits on the boards of three companies, each focused on a different modality. Aurobac is tackling antimicrobial resistance and bacterial infections, while RiboX Therapeutics is developing circular RNA therapeutics and Tacalyx is exploring tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) for cancer. The latter two, Mennerich said, are platform companies.

“We historically invest in a lot of platform companies, but we don’t invest for the sake of platform technology,” he explained. “The front runner project in this company needs to stand on their own legs, must be the value driver, because we do not want to entertain a clinical trial with venture money [if it] has no commercial value.”

While DeWire said Boehringer recently rebranded its CNS division to focus on mental health, neurodegenerative diseases are still a key investment area at the BI Venture Fund. Boston-based Rgenta Therapeutics and San Diego–headquartered Libra Therapeutics aim to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by focusing on “completely new targets,” Mennerich said—a quality that partly represents the fund’s overall strategy. “We take the higher risk.”

As to whether Boehringer will ultimately acquire Rgenta and Libra, Mennerich said, “that’s the hope, but Boehringer’s not alone. At the end of the day, Boehringer’s supposed to make a competitive offer.”

For Boehringer’s part, DeWire said the company is “starting to get active in neurodegeneration . . . maybe this is a way that we enter that space.”

Lilly’s ‘Keeping an Eye on’ Healthspan

Over at Lilly Gateway Labs, about half of the startups are focused on Lilly’s core therapeutic areas: neuroscience, oncology, immunology, cardiometabolic health and, to a lesser extent, genetic medicine, Gilmore said. As for the rest, she continued, “they may be pursuing different therapeutic areas, different targets, different disease states, different modalities.”

One of these areas is healthspan and longevity, which Gilmore said is “kind of adjacent” to the company’s current internal efforts. “We do see it playing out in each of our areas of interest, and maybe even beyond our core therapeutic areas,” she said. “It’s something we’re definitely keeping an eye on.”

With locations in Boston, San Diego, South San Francisco, China and soon the U.K., Lilly Gateway Labs looks for companies with “novel, cutting-edge science” of interest to the parent organization, Gilmore said. The relationship must also be symbiotic. “Does Lilly have something we can offer them? Do we have history, expertise, capabilities that we could apply to help them move forward?”

A Cash Infusion

While Lilly Gateway Labs is a hands-on program where startups remain for around four years, other Big Pharmas emphasize capital investment, with a side helping of advice. Pfizer Ventures has a $900 million capital commitment for investment in private companies at all stages of development with a “strong focus on early-stage opportunities.” The Novartis Venture Fund (NVF) currently invests in over 40 life science companies across North America and Europe with around $750 million under management. Both companies also offer their extensive industry experience. Pfizer Ventures proposes the potential for a “business relationship” and “scientific advisory board participation when appropriate,” while NVF states that they “prefer to play an active role by taking a seat on the board.”

For other companies, incubators and accelerators are an opportunity to invest in emerging geographic hotspots. The Roche Accelerator, established in May 2021, reflects the Swiss pharma’s mission to “become a leading healthcare company in China,” according to its website.

“Over the past 20 years, Roche has continuously invested in research and development in China,” a company spokesperson told BioSpace in an email. “We’ve been recognizing the country’s rise for its scientific innovation and vibrant biotech ecosystem, and strengthening the partnerships with local biotech companies.”

In terms of focus, the Roche Accelerator “aims to attract entrepreneurs in the areas of therapeutics, diagnostics, and AI/ML solutions,” according to the spokesperson. To-date, nearly 20 local startups have been selected from over 500 applicants to join the accelerator. “These innovative companies are driving the exploration of novel biological mechanisms and developing cutting-edge technologies including molecular glues, cyclic peptides, novel drug conjugates, RNA, cell therapies, and those leveraging AI/ML to transform drug discovery processes,” they said.

https://www.biospace.com/business/building-pharmas-farm-system-eli-lilly-boehringer-ingelheim-more-invest-in-the-future

'Big Pharma Provides Lifeline to Chinese Companies Struggling To Survive'

 

Out-licensing drugs to multinational corporations is a natural step for Chinese biotechs, but the recent rise in deals is only scratching at the surface of partnership-ready biotechs in the region.

As multinational pharma companies have descended on China to find new drug candidates, the CEO of one company headquartered there watched a neighboring startup in Shanghai empty out its building.

The CEO, under the pseudonym of Tom, who asked to remain anonymous in order to speak candidly, heads a company that focuses on lung diseases in China’s vibrant biotech hub, the Shanghai Zhangjiang Pharma Valley. Tom and others who spoke to BioSpace say that the international pharma deal boom that has pushed China to the forefront of the world’s biotech scene obscures a different reality. On the ground, many companies were running out of money when the world showed up. Often, out-licensing deals to American or other companies offered their best shot to stay afloat.

A similar situation played out at BioBAY in Suzhou, about 65 miles west of Shanghai; companies have been quietly laying off staff, cutting their pipelines and hunting for new buyers since 2022. Some have filed for bankruptcy.

“Things were extremely hard [for companies] in 2023 and 2024,” said Tom, who returned to China from the U.S. in 2008. “Simply because they don’t have money anymore.”

Now, thanks to newly ignited international interest and exposure, China has emerged as the hottest place to find new molecules, and out-licensing overseas rights to promising drug candidates is a natural step for biotech companies based there. The rush of interest couldn’t have come at a better time for China’s biotechs.

But there’s not enough money to go around in a market that ballooned in the early days of the pandemic. So while international interest is generating excitement with record-setting deals, the feeling on the ground in China is mixed. Executives know that as some companies are catapulted onto the international stage, others will die at the same time.

“Whether or not the [biotech] ecosystem will have sustainable funding remains a challenge,” said Fanning Zhang, a partner at McKinsey & Company based in Shanghai.

As Tom and other CEOs have seen, out-licensing has become a forced move for most Chinese biotech companies including some of those with multimillion-dollar deals.

Rising Star

China’s rise as a biotech powerhouse can be traced back to the government’s overhaul of drug review regulations and capital investment from both private and public funds in the past decade. Based on vast patient and pharmaceutical engineer pools, with only 30% to 50% of the cost needed to develop a drug in the U.S., China seems to have achieved the impossible triangle in drug R&D: efficient, high-quality and cost-effective.

“China can do it in a way that can be summarized as ‘many, fast, good, and cheap’,” said Sam Lou, the former GM of Parexel China and co-founder of Hope Medicine, a biotech company based in Nanjing. “This is not a ‘DeepSeek’ moment for China’s biotechs. This is a confirmed trend.”

The country has also benefitted from the return of numerous internationally trained scientists, who have been educated elsewhere and returned home to work at local biotechs or start their own. They were drawn back to China by generous talent incentives and the profitable prospect of new drugs.

But just like in America, a rush of initial public offerings (IPOs) prior to 2022 brought a wave of unprofitable biotechs onto the Chinese markets. In 2021, Chinese biotech IPOs peaked at 89, 57 of which were in China’s mainland stock markets in Shanghai and Shenzhen. The window for going public snapped shut as regulations tightened and China continued to reel from the pandemic. Since then, tensions between the U.S. and China have risen while U.S. capital deployment in China shrank dramatically. In 2023, only 21 biotech companies successfully launched IPOs in China A-shares, marking a sharp decrease of 57.14% and 70.15% in total offerings and fundraising in IPOs.

“Now, there is no single modality that you can’t find a second candidate in China,” said Lou. “It’s not even just the second or third. There is almost no modality in which there are less than five or 10 startups at the same phase available [in China].”

That volume was driven in part by an influx of venture capital towards the end of 2024. These funds offered a NewCo strategy to bring a Chinese product across the pond. The Chinese company will spin off certain clinical assets and partner with investors to refinance them by creating a new company in an offshore jurisdiction. In October 2024, Kailera Therapeutics emerged using this strategy, raising $400 million in a series A backed by three venture capital firms. The company licensed four assets from Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals, a leading biopharma in China.

“These are all new phenomena that were not common before,” said Jack, CEO of a Shanghai-based publicly-listed biotech who agreed to talk under the condition that he use a pseudonym. Jack has served multiple international pharmaceutical companies and biotech startups in China as vice president or general manager for over 20 years.

All the venture capital activity has attracted plenty of attention. Jack noted that many international pharmaceutical giants have sent business development teams to Shanghai in search of potential deal candidates, at the same time expanding their BD teams in China.

“We’ve seen many [multinational corporations] come here recently,” he said. “They want to get involved early on for the project they want.”

The past six months alone have seen 80 out-licensing deals from China, including some notable big-ticket announcements. On May 19, Pfizer committed up to $6 billion to 3SBio, Inc., a Shenyang-based biotech company, for ex-China rights to SSGJ-707, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF. The $1.25 billion upfront payment was the highest on record for a therapy from a Chinese biotech. Less than a month later, AstraZeneca announced an R&D collaboration with CSPC in a deal valued at over $5 billion.

And just last week, GSK agreed to pay up to $12 billion for 12 oncology candidates from Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals. In addition to Big Pharma’s big dollars, small- to medium sized biotechs like Summit Therapeutics, which in 2022 licensed Akeso’s “Keytruda killer,” are eyeing partnerships with Chinese counterparts, Jack said. Among the top 20 international buyers in 2025 deals, the majority are U.S.-founded biotechs.

“The global biotech value chain is being reconstructed, and China and the U.S. are integrating their complementary strengths,” said Jack. “It’s a huge difference now.”

Challenges and Hope Ahead

The flurry of dealmaking has provided critical hope to Chinese biotechs struggling after the VC gravy train officially ended. When Lou and his team at Hope Medicine were fundraising for their first two rounds in 2018 and 2021, he remembered an easy sell. Investors had two questions: When do they need the money, and how much do they need? When they returned for more in 2023, the U.S. dollars had “already dried out” for Chinese companies, Lou said.

Lou and many other CEOs have had to turn to Renminbi funds—state-owned capitals that fund life science and healthcare. While the cash provides a lifeline, the investments usually come with strict return terms and longer negotiations—and “zero tolerance for any failure,” according to Tom. They also tend to come in relatively small packages, he added, with few state-owned funds willing to write a big check like before the pandemic.

But most Chinese biotechs don’t have a choice. The spate of licensing deals, while a notable sign of interest in the growing Chinese sector, has lifted up only a fraction of the market, Tom said. “There are more than 1,000 companies just in Zhangjiang [Pharma Valley], but no one is cutting deals with them because they are not in the hot zone.” The hot zone, he explained, is oncology, particularly antibodies and antibody–drug conjugates.

That said, all three CEOs that BioSpace spoke to see the uptick in licensing deals as crucial endorsements for Chinese biotech companies and said the interest is boosting investor confidence again. These new deals have made the stock market in Hong Kong warm up again and private investors are reevaluating their strategies.

On an earnings call Tuesday, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said a team from the company had just returned from a week of scouting prospects in China.

“The opportunities are really, really big,” Bourla said.

Lou has now stepped aside from his management duties at Hope Medicine and is preparing to launch a new startup company in neuro-immunology.

“China has built up an ecosystem in biotechnology, and now won the approval of the global market,” he said. “I’ll say that it’s sooner than later that the IPs and assets from China’s biotech will command higher value and greater trust.”

https://www.biospace.com/business/big-pharma-provides-lifeline-to-chinese-companies-struggling-to-survive