Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Prediction markets will grow to $1 trillion by 2030, Bernstein estimates

 

  • Investment firm Bernstein estimates that by 2030, prediction market volumes will surge to roughly $1 trillion. 
  • Dollar volumes on the markets surged in 2024, spurred by the U.S. presidential election, then expanded further in 2025 thanks to sports, crypto and macro/political contracts. 
  • While a regulatory battle is brewing, Bernstein thinks it’s unlikely to deter long-term growth. 


  • Prediction market volumes are booming in 2026, on pace to more than quadruple this year alone and reach an estimated $1 trillion in the next four years, according to Bernstein.

    Volumes have already surged in the first few months of this year, the investment bank wrote in a report Tuesday, with Kalshi and Polymarket, the two largest platforms, seeing about $60 billion in market volume year-to-date — more than the $51 billion in total prediction market volume in all of 2025.


    Growth rates for the platforms rival the artificial intelligence boom, according to Bank of America. Analyst Julie Hoover in a note last week called Kalshi one of the “fastest growing non-AI companies” in the U.S. Weekly trading volume on Kalshi — which controls more than 90% of the U.S. prediction market — has surged to more than $3 billion today from about $100 million a year ago, she wrote.

    While prediction market volumes initially jumped in 2024 around the U.S. presidential election, they eventually surpassed those levels in 2025 as sports, cryptocurrency and macroeconomic contracts became popular.
    $1 trillion by 2030

    Bernstein analyst Gautam Chhugani now estimates that total market volumes in 2026 will reach $240 billion, a 370% increase compared to last year. At a compound annual growth rate of roughly 80% between 2025 and 2030, Chhugani sees prediction market trading volume of $1 trillion a year by the start of the next decade.

    Chhugani expects increased regulatory clarity at the federal level will boost the potential market, and that blockchain tokenization and integration with cryptocurrencies is enabling more liquidity. The makeup of traded contracts is also likely to change, he said.



    While Kalshi and Polymarket dominate the space, new names are building a presence. Robinhood, DraftKings and Underdog are all starting or have already launched their own prediction market verticals, Bank of America’s Hoover said.
    Public proxies

    Robinhood and Coinbase Global are the key public market proxies for the private prediction market companies, Chhugani said. Robinhood’s prediction markets hub is now a year old, generating $350 million in annual recurring revenue, and accounting for some 30% of Kalshi total volume. The market is the digital finance platform’s fastest-growing business, and could encourage Robinhood to develop its own exchange, the analyst said.

    While Chhugani’s long-range estimates assume the resolution of long-term regulatory risk, in the near-term state and federal regulators and the prediction markets themselves are engaged in a pitched battle. “Legal action is now pending in 14 states, plus another 4 congressional bills [are] also pending amid concerns around insider trading,” Hoover wrote.


    Still, Chhugani has faith that this won’t derail the multi-year outlook.

    “Despite ongoing state-level legal challenges, we expect platforms like Kalshi, Polymarket, and public proxies (HOOD, COIN) to benefit from increasing regulatory clarity and growing alignment with federal regulators (SEC, CFTC) — a key driver of market legitimacy and mainstream adoption,” he wrote.


    “We expect [the] institutional market to develop around economics, business and political contracts, as investors seek more direct and discrete exposure to events,” he wrote. While sports contracts make up more than 60% of trading volume today, he sees that being cut in half by 2030. “We also expect hedging demand from corporates, [and] insurance firms exposed to specific event risks.”


    Some states have begun legal action against prediction markets, citing their authority to regulate sports betting, while the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is fighting states, claiming it has the only authority to regulate prediction markets.


    https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/14/prediction-markets-will-grow-to-1-trillion-by-2030-bernstein-says.html

Appeals Court Terminates Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Trump Admin

 by Stacy Robinson via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

An appeals court has put a stop to criminal contempt proceedings initiated by a district judge against the Trump administration.

District Judge James Boasberg, chief judge of the District Court for the District of Columbia, stands for a portrait at E. Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse in Washington on March 16, 2023. Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via AP

An appeals court has put a stop to criminal contempt proceedings initiated by a district judge against the Trump administration.

In a brief, unsigned order on April 14, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated a previous order by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, and ordered him to terminate the contempt investigation he launched in December.

Today’s decision by the DC Circuit should finally end Judge Boasberg’s year-long campaign against the hardworking Department attorneys doing their jobs fighting illegal immigration,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote on X.

The contempt proceedings stemmed from the deportation of illegal immigrants—suspected gang members—to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, last year. Boasberg had ordered planes carrying those detainees halted and turned around, but the men were sent to El Salvador anyway.

The Trump administration had appealed Boasberg’s order all the way to the Supreme Court, which overturned his ruling. Despite that, Boasberg tried to hold members of the administration in contempt of his order unless they returned the suspected gang members to the United States.

Boasberg reasoned that, though the Supreme Court ruled his previous order was in error, that didn’t excuse the federal government from violating it ahead of time.

The appeals court blocked that move by vacating Boasberg’s contempt order, but he decided to move ahead with a contempt investigation in November. He ordered a hearing, where he informed both parties that he would launch an inquiry to learn who was responsible for the violation of his order.
I certainly intend to find out what happened on that day,” Boasberg told attorneys for the Department of Justice (DOJ) at the Nov. 19, 2025, proceedings. He asked the government to identify who made the decision to go ahead with the deportations.

Then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made the decision, the Trump administration later informed the court.

But Boasberg was unsatisfied and “the district court again moved the goalposts,” Circuit Judge Neomi Rao wrote. On Dec. 8, 2025, Boasberg ordered a further investigation to find out whether Noem’s decision was a “willful violation” of his order.

“Undeterred, the district court is proceeding with criminal contempt for the government’s decision to transfer the plaintiffs to the custody of El Salvador,” Rao wrote.

She added that the Appeals Court needed to intervene again “to prevent the district court from assuming an antagonistic jurisdiction that encroaches on the autonomy of the Executive Branch.”

In a 2–1 decision, the appeals court ruled that Boasberg, by ordering an inquiry into why his order was defied, was trying “to probe high-level Executive Branch deliberations about matters of national security and diplomacy.”

Apart from that, Rao wrote, the government did not violate Boasberg’s written order by turning the deportees over to the El Salvadoran government.

“These proceedings are a clear abuse of discretion, as the district court’s order said nothing about transferring custody of the plaintiffs and therefore lacks the clarity to support criminal contempt based on the transfer of custody,” she wrote.

In a dissenting opinion, Circuit Judge J. Michelle Childs said the question wasn’t quite so simple and that Boasberg was right to order further investigation. She cited a transcript of Boasberg’s oral order—given a little while before his written order was issued—in which he plainly told the government to bring the detainees back to the United States.

“However that’s accomplished, whether turning around a plane or not embarking anyone on the plane or those people covered by this on the plane, I leave to you,” Boasberg had told DOJ attorney Drew Ensign during an emergency hearing last March.

Childs also wrote that the April 14 ruling sets a dangerous precedent.

“Now, any litigant can argue, based on their preferred interpretation of a court’s order, that they did not commit contempt before contempt findings are even made,” she wrote.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/appeals-court-terminates-criminal-contempt-proceedings-against-trump-admin

Operation Epic Fury takes aim at banks handling Iranian money

 The Trump administration is sending letters to banks in four areas about handling Iranian money.

The letter obtained by FOX Business says the Treasury Department has evidence that banks in Oman, the UAE, Hong Kong and China have allowed Iranian funds used for illicit activities to be funneled through them.

A senior administration official not authorized to speak publicly says this is the first step to adding secondary sanctions on those banks, which would cut them off from the U.S. financial system.

"Now is the time to finally disable Iran’s ability to support terrorism, threaten the region and global markets, and seek to continue its nuclear and ballistic missile program, which the U.N. has prohibited," the letter said.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday warned companies and countries against paying Iran to transit the Strait of Hormuz because that opens them up to secondary sanctions. Bessent is leading the sanction charge in Operation Epic Fury.

This letter is different, but shows the administration's willingness to up the ante and truly go after the Iranian money.

The U.S. waiver to sell Iranian oil at sea will expire on April 19.

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-admins-operation-epic-fury-takes-aim-banks-handling-iranian-money

Pending $1.6B merger speculation ignites low-float breakout and volatility halts in AFJK

 


AFJK, a SPAC, has been working toward a business combination with United Hydrogen Group (a hydrogen/energy business) valued around $1.5–1.6 billion that would result in a Nasdaq-listed entity. The company recently announced its 17th one-month extension of the deadline (to May 6, 2026) via a small trust account deposit and promissory note on April 7, with no brand-new press release or filing appearing on April 14. The stock exhibited extreme volatility in early April (e.g., massive volume spike and +140% move on April 9 to a high near $85, followed by pullbacks). On April 14, it broke out sharply from the prior close of ~$40.40, surging over 60–72% intraday to the $66 area on elevated relative volume. With a very low float (~2.8 million shares), the move triggered multiple LULD volatility halts. Trader chatter on X highlighted the “$1.6B Nasdaq listing catalyst,” momentum above resistance (~$50), and speculative buying in this low-float name. The price action reflects classic retail/momentum-driven trading on the long-pending deal rather than a discrete new fundamental trigger.

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=AFJK&p=d

Piper Sandler upgrades Biogen to Overweight, raises target to $214 on Apellis acquisition

 

Piper Sandler upgrades Biogen to Overweight, raises target to $214 on Apellis acquisition

  • Piper Sandler says Apellis acquisition should help offset declines in Biogen's legacy multiple sclerosis franchise.

Avanos Medical announces definitive agreement to be acquired by American Industrial Partners

 Avanos Medical announces definitive agreement to be acquired by American Industrial Partners for $25.00 per share in $1.272 billion cash deal

https://finviz.com/quote.ashx?t=AVNS&p=d

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/dei-practices-reduce-productivity-cost-94-billion-annually-white-house-economic-report