Search This Blog

Saturday, January 25, 2025

'Some migrants turn to pricey smugglers or riskier routes after Trump clampdown'

 After Honduran migrant Alex Diaz' U.S. asylum appointment was canceled following Donald Trump's immigration and border crackdown, the 23-year-old former bus driver began considering what he had been determined to avoid: entering the United States illegally.

FILE PHOTO: Alex Dia from Honduras, 23, stands outside a shelter after the cancellation of his asylum appointment made through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP One application and is unsure of what to do next, in Piedras Negras, Mexico, January 21, 2025. Dia tells Reuters, ?I don?t want to go in as an illegal?. REUTERS/Cheney Orr/File Photo© Thomson Reuters

Since Trump ended former President Joe Biden's legal entry program at the border and is ramping up border security, Diaz is considering using smugglers who would bring him deeper into the United States, along isolated pathways.

FILE PHOTO: Alex Dia from Honduras, 23, looks out of a window from within the courtyard of a shelter after the cancellation of his asylum appointment made through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP One application and is unsure of what to do next, in Piedras Negras, Mexico January 21, 2025. Dia tells Reuters, "I don't want to go in as an illegal". REUTERS/Cheney Orr/File Photo© Thomson Reuters

"I didn't want to come in illegally. But Trump can't take the American dream from me," Diaz told Reuters outside a shelter in the Mexican border town of Piedras Negras.

He said smugglers were quoting him $7,000 to reach the Texan city of San Antonio, roughly 146 miles (235 kilometers) away.

Unsure whether his siblings in Louisiana could assemble the money and worried about his safety on potentially perilous routes, Diaz was still pondering whether to attempt a crossing. 

As part of his announced crackdown on migrants at the U.S.-Mexican border, Trump on Monday shut down Biden's CBP One program, which allowed migrants in Mexico to schedule an appointment to request asylum at a legal border crossing.

Migrants like Diaz now face pricier, riskier smuggling routes into the United States, according to interviews with a half-dozen migrants, one smuggler and U.S. law enforcement.

Record numbers of migrants were caught crossing illegally under Biden and many were released into the U.S. with pending immigration court hearings. Biden implemented asylum restrictions in June 2024, which Biden officials said partly contributed to a steep drop in migrant apprehensions.

The Trump rule changes, aimed at stopping what he terms an "invasion" at the border, are operating alongside the existing Biden restrictions implemented last year, a Trump administration official said.

The effect of the overlapping restrictions remained unclear during Trump's first days in office. Trump's border czar Tom Homan said on Wednesday that Border Patrol had apprehended 766 migrants attempting to cross illegally the previous day, about half the daily average in December.

One Mexican smuggler, speaking on condition of anonymity, said prices had gone up in part due to more restrictions on the U.S. side. 

BUSINESS FOR SMUGGLERS 

Valeriano Perez, an investigator with the sheriff's office in the Texan border county of Maverick, says he expects cartels to take migrants on riskier routes across the desert and drive them further from the border. 

"They're going to have to figure out a way for them to pass the checkpoints, for them to get sent to the northern cities. It makes the job longer for the cartels," Perez told Reuters. 

As a consequence, he added, his office, which has a total of around 80 deputies and jailers, would likely increase patrols in the brush and along highways. Given the use of more dangerous routes, Perez said he expected to find more dead migrants.

Roberto, a shopkeeper from southern Mexico who had been waiting in Tijuana for his CBP One appointment on Jan. 22, is crushed now that the price charged by smugglers to help migrants cross has shot up to 140,000 Mexican pesos ($6,900) from roughly 85,000 Mexican pesos ($4,200). 

"Trump has given the business back to smugglers, because people are going to keep crossing no matter what," said Roberto, 34, who did not want to share his last name out of safety concerns.

"I'm going to stay in Tijuana and get the money together to cross."

Some migrants, put off by the prices or the risk of ramped-up deportations under Trump once in the United States, are opting to stay in Mexico.

But Diaz, the Honduran migrant at the Piedras Negras shelter, says he is determined to get to the U.S., in part because he has two young children to support in Honduras. 

He missed an asylum appointment earlier this month because he said he was kidnapped by a gang in Mexico while on a bus to the border and beaten for three days until his relatives paid $1,000 to free him.

Now, he is waiting to hear back from friends who recently crossed the border illegally to see if it worked out for them before possibly trying himself. 

"I want to cross but I'm scared they're going to catch me," Diaz said. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/some-migrants-turn-to-pricey-smugglers-or-riskier-routes-after-trump-clampdown/ar-AA1xN5iv

Four Israeli soldiers swapped for 200 Palestinians; north Gaza shut over hostage still held

 Hamas freed four female Israeli soldiers on Saturday in exchange for 200 Palestinian prisoners, the second swap under the Gaza truce, although Israel halted families from returning to bombed-out north Gaza over a delay in another hostage's release.

Released Israeli hostage Daniella Gilboa, a soldier who was seized from her army base in southern Israel during the deadly October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas, is embraced by her parents after being released as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in an unknown location, in a handout photo obtained by Reuters on January 25, 2025. Israel Defense Forces/Handout via REUTERS© Thomson Reuters

The four freed Israelis were led onto a podium in Gaza City amid a large crowd of Palestinians and surrounded by dozens of armed Hamas men. They waved and smiled before being led off, entering Red Cross vehicles to be transported to Israeli forces.

Released Israeli hostage Naama Levy, a soldier who was seized from her army base in southern Israel during the deadly October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas, embraces loved ones after being released as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in an unknown location, in a handout photo obtained by Reuters on January 25, 2025. Israel Defense Forces/Handout via REUTERS© Thomson Reuters

Soon after, buses carrying released Palestinian prisoners were seen departing from the Israeli Ofer military prison in the occupied West Bank. Israel's Prison Service said all 200 had been released.

The releases on either side were greeted by cheering crowds, including Israelis gathered in Tel Aviv and Palestinians assembled in Ramallah.

But the failure of Hamas to release another hostage, a female Israeli civilian, led Israel to announce it was halting plans to let Palestinians return to northern parts of Gaza, the area worst hit in the war. Hamas said it would free her next week, and called the halt to the reopening of the north a violation of the truce.

Palestinian officials say as many as 650,000 displaced people are waiting to return to the north from Sunday under the ceasefire. Witnesses said there was a stampede on a road leading to the north, blocked by Israeli troops who opened fire. Medics said three people were injured by suspected Israeli fire, one seriously.

Four female Israeli soldiers, who had been held in Gaza since the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, are released by Hamas militants as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Gaza City, January 25, 2025. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas© Thomson Reuters

The truce calls for Hamas to release 33 women, children, elderly, sick and wounded hostages over a six-week first phase, with Israel freeing 30 prisoners for each civilian and 50 for each soldier.

The four Israeli soldiers freed on Saturday - Karina Ariev, Daniella Gilboa, Naama Levy and Liri Albag - had all been stationed at an observation post on the edge of Gaza when Hamas fighters overran their base and abducted them during the Oct. 7, 2023 attack on Israel that precipitated the war.

Their parents clapped and cried out in joy when they saw them on screen, watching the handover live from a nearby military base across the border. In Tel Aviv, hundreds of Israelis gathered at a rallying point now widely referred to as Hostages Square, crying, embracing and cheering as the release was aired on a giant screen.

An Israeli military helicopter transporting released Israeli hostages, who have been held in Gaza since the deadly October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas, as part of a prisoner-hostage exchange deal between Israel and Hamas, arrives at Beilinson Schneider complex, in Petah Tikva, Israel, January 25, 2025. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun© Thomson Reuters

The women were reunited with their families and then flown aboard helicopters to a hospital in central Israel. Photos published by the Israeli military showed them embracing tightly with their parents, in smiles and tears.

The 200 Palestinians freed on Saturday include militants, some serving life sentences for involvement in attacks that killed dozens of people, according to a list published by Hamas.

Israel says those convicted of killing Israelis will not be permitted to return home. Around 70 will be deported to Egypt, Palestinian officials said, and from there to another country, possibly Turkey, Qatar or Algeria.

Another 16 were sent to Gaza and the rest were released to the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where cheering crowds waving Palestinian flags gathered in Ramallah to greet them.

DISPUTE

Joy in Israel over Saturday's release was clouded by disappointment after it emerged that Arbel Yehud, 29, who had been abducted with her boyfriend from their home in Kibbutz Nir Oz, was not among those released on Saturday.

An Israeli military spokesman called it a breach of the truce, while Hamas said it was a technical issue. A Hamas official said the group had informed mediators that she was alive and would be freed next Saturday.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Palestinians in Gaza would not be allowed to cross back to the northern part of the territory until the issue was resolved.

Thousands of people were massed with their belongings along the coastal road, where they said an Israeli tank continued to block the road to the north.

"I will not go back to the tent," Zaki Kashef, 26, waiting on the coastal road to return north from Deir Al-Balah where he has been sheltering with his family for more than a year, told Reuters via a chat app. "Where are the mediators? Why can't they force Israel to respect the deal?"

Witnesses sent Reuters messages from the scene saying people waiting to cross the major Salahuddin road that bisects the Gaza Strip had fled in panic after Israeli tanks opened fire.

The ceasefire agreement, worked out after months of on-off negotiations brokered by Qatar and Egypt and backed by the United States, has halted the fighting for the first time in more than a year.

Following Saturday's release, 90 hostages remain in Gaza, according to Israeli authorities, who have declared around a third of them dead in absentia.

Twenty-six are still slated for release in the first phase, after which the sides are expected to negotiate the exchange of the rest, including men of military age, and withdrawal of Israeli forces.

Families of hostages due to be released in later phases worry that the ceasefire could break down first. Some Israelis critical of the truce say Israel must resume fighting to prevent Hamas from returning to power in Gaza. Hamas says it will not free all hostages until the war ends for good.

Israel launched its campaign in Gaza following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack, when militants killed 1,200 people and took more than 250 hostages to Gaza, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's campaign has killed more than 47,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to health authorities there. More than 400 Israeli soldiers have also died in Gaza combat.

https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/world/four-israeli-soldiers-swapped-for-200-palestinians-north-gaza-shut-over-hostage-still-held/ar-AA1xR1Vq

Rubio To Visit Panama on Latam Trip Amid Rising Tensions Over Canal

 by Darlene McCormick Sanchez via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is set to make his first trip abroad next week, which will include a stop in Panama amid rising tensions over President Donald Trump’s vow to take back the Panama Canal.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio at the State Department in Washington on Jan. 21, 2025. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

China is operating the Panama Canal. And we didn’t give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back,” Trump said during his inaugural speech.

Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino has denied that China is running the canal and stated it won’t be returned to the United States.

Tammy Bruce, department spokeswoman, said Rubio—a Florida Senator with Cuban roots—also planned to visit El Salvador, Guatemala, Costa Rica, and the Dominican Republic.

Bruce said the visit stemmed from Rubio’s interest in the region and his desire to strengthen ties with Central American countries, in particular to battle illegal immigration.

Rubio may have his work cut out during his visit to Panama as tensions over Trump’s comments have escalated.

During his confirmation hearing, Rubio characterized the Panamanian government as “very friendly to the United States and very cooperative.”

We want that to continue,” he said.

One bright spot during the visit could include working with Panama to curtail mass migration.

Mulino campaigned on shutting down illegal immigration through Panama’s Darien Gap.

However, the focus on the Panama Canal could overshadow immigration talks.

Rubio noted during his hearing that Chinese companies controlling port facilities on both ends of the canal have been a concern for a decade.

During a 2017 trip to Panama, Rubio said he discussed China’s influence along the waterway, which is a choke point with military value. It’s a critical pathway for U.S. warships in both the Atlantic and Pacific.

Rubio said military and security officials in Panama said during his visit that Beijing could potentially use its commercial ports during a military conflict.

There are “no independent Chinese companies,” Rubio said. “They all exist because they’ve been identified as national champions. They’re supported by the Chinese government.”

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mandates that Chinese companies cooperate with state intelligence agencies.

China began to invest in Panama around 2016 and 2017, and the money had strings attached, Rubio said.

The China-based Landbridge struck a $900 million deal in 2016 to control Margarita Island, Panama’s largest port on the Atlantic side, to build a deepwater port.

In 2017, Panama signed on to China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), dubbed a modern Silk Road, after publicly recognizing Taiwan as part of China, much to the surprise and concern of the United States.

In 2018, during Trump’s first term in office, U.S. and domestic Panamanian pressure was credited with ending China’s plan to construct a large embassy at the mouth of the canal, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

That same year, a Chinese consortium headed by China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC) and state-owned China Communications Construction Company (CCCC) was awarded a $1.4 billion contract for the canal’s fourth bridge.

The CCCC was involved in constructing China’s man-made islands in the disputed South China Sea.

On the Pacific side of the canal, in the spring of 2024, Chinese companies completed work on the enormous Amador Pacific Coast cruise terminal built by the CHEC.

Who Has De Facto Control?

This month, in an interview with The Associated Press, canal administrator Ricaurte Vásquez rejected claims that the canal was controlled by China while noting that American and Taiwanese businesses also operate ports along the canal.

The Panama Canal Authority manages the administration and maintenance of the waterway’s resources and security. It operates independently of the Panamanian government.

“I mean, that’s one of those things that is factual but not truthful,” said Joshua Trevino, a former vice president of policy at the Pacific Research Institute and current policy analyst for the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

The canal authority may technically control the waterway, but Chinese companies also have functional control over the ports and pay the bills, he told The Epoch Times.

“If you have the financial and operational control—which they do—the titular government is a lot less important than those two things,” he said.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/rubio-visit-panama-amid-rising-tensions-over-canal

Pfizer BRAFTOVI Combo Improved Response in Colorectal Cancer

 

  • Clinically meaningful and statistically significant results from the Phase 3 BREAKWATER trial show objective response rate of 61% with Pfizer’s BRAFTOVI combination regimen compared to 40% with investigator’s choice of chemotherapy, representing a doubling of the odds of achieving an objective response
  • BRAFTOVI combination regimen is the first and only targeted therapy approved by the U.S. FDA for treatment-naïve patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with a BRAF V600E mutation

Donald Trump is a Great Man of History

 Thomas Carlyle would have been impressed by Donald Trump. The author of On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History (1841) thought that history organised itself around great men the way that iron filings form patterns in a magnetic field.

The eighteenth century, Carlyle thought, had lost its moral elasticity and spiritual tautness. He prophesied that his own time would be a crucible of renewal in which “the world will once more become … a heroic world”.

Over the last year, Donald Trump has emerged as a Carlylean figure, an historic man of action who, having triumphed over extraordinary adversity, has become a totem of the age, a man through whom the highest ambitions of the country find expression.

I know that sounds odd. A year ago, Trump was finished. The swank people who tell us what to think had written him off. There he was, staggering under scores of indictments in at least four separate jurisdictions. Would he not be bankrupted, incarcerated, swept ignominiously into the dustbin of history?

Somehow, Trump not only survived but thrived. Did he merely ride the cresting wave of the Zeitgeist or also help define it? The same question might be asked of Caesar, Napoleon, FDR, or Ronald Reagan.

There are still some flaccid, hand-ringing mutterers who can’t absorb the reality of what Donald Trump represents. He represents beneficent change. The anti-Trump whiners congregate in their faculty lounges, their DEI workshops, their climate-change seminars in Aspen. Here and there one finds pods of sad people like Chris Mayes, the Attorney General of Arizona, who has vowed to resist aspects of Trump’s immigration efforts. One might as well vow to resist a tornado.

Elsewhere, in the real world, what had been an anti-Trump consensus is disintegrating. Even Politico has absorbed an inkling of the truth. Trump is, a recent column tells us, “someone with an ability to perceive opportunities that most politicians do not and forge powerful, sustained connections with large swaths of people in ways that no contemporary can match. In other words: He is a force of history.”

The title of that column is revealing. “Time to Admit It: Trump Is a Great President. He’s Still Trying To Be a Good One.” The charge that has most often been levelled against Trump is that he is a man of “bad character”. Even the patently absurd claims that Trump is a “fascist” (General Mark Milley reportedly called him that) or “literally Hitler” follow from the judgment that Trump is just too naff for words, an aesthetic determination that quickly shades into moral obloquy.

I think there are two things to be said about this. Let me turn to Horace Walpole for the first. “No country was ever saved by good men,” Walpole once observed, “because good men will not go to the length that may be necessary”.

This is where a certain expedient moral ambiguity enters. Like many people, I believe that Donald Trump is on the threshold of saving America. That is, I believe that his diagnosis of America’s problems is accurate. High on the list of those problems are a paralysing commitment to woke ideology, mass migration, stupefying debt, and cratering cultural self-confidence.

I also believe that Trump’s proposed solutions – articulated in his tsunami of executive orders and presidential proclamations – have the best chance of inaugurating that “new golden age” he touts. 

Does that also mean that I believe that Trump is not a “good man”? No, and to explain why I turn to Cardinal Newman. A man, said Newman, “may be great in one aspect of his character, and little-minded in another … A good man may make a bad king; profligates have been great statesmen, or magnanimous political leaders.”

As far as I know, no one has proposed Donald Trump for sainthood. Moreover, in the ways that matter for a president, he has shown himself to be a man of good character. Any meaningful definition of good character has to involve an instrumental element. Otherwise the character in question would be impotent. This is part of what Aristotle meant, I think, when he observed that “it is our choice of good or evil that determines our character, not our opinion about good or evil”.

On issue after issue – the economy, national security, energy policy, free speech, crime – Donald Trump’s “common sense” revolution promises to restore America’s preeminence. Along with other larger-than-life personalities like Elon Musk, Donald Trump signals the welcome return of the Great Man idea of historical evolution.


Roger Kimball is editor and publisher of The New Criterion and president and publisher of Encounter Books

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/comment/2025/01/24/donald-trump-is-a-great-man-of-history/

House Passes Bill To Protect Babies Born Alive After Failed Abortions

 by Samantha Flom via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A bill to establish standards of care for babies born alive after failed abortions passed along party lines in the House on Jan. 23.

The 217–204 vote followed a heated debate in the chamber, during which Republicans stressed that the bill was not about abortion but the babies who survive the procedure.

Pro-life activists march across the National Mall near the U.S. Capitol during the 50th annual National March for Life, in Washington on Jan. 20, 2023. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

“As a physician, it is beyond my comprehension that anyone would not intervene to save an innocent and defenseless human life,” Rep. Gregory Murphy (R-N.C.) said, defending the bill on the House floor.

“Neglect is harm. Neglect is immoral. Abortion is not the issue.”

The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act requires medical professionals present at a newborn abortion survivor’s birth to provide the same level of life-saving care to that baby as would be offered to any other premature infant of the same gestational age.

The bill mandates the transfer of such infants to a hospital for additional treatment and also establishes reporting requirements for violations. Penalties for violating the law could include fines and up to five years in prison, though the child’s mother would be protected from prosecution.

Democrats, however, argued that infanticide is already illegal and that the bill is therefore unnecessary.

“This bill does not solve a problem,” Rep. Kelly Morrison (D-Minn.), an obstetrician, said before voting against the measure in the House.

“Doctors are already both honored and obligated to provide appropriate care for their patients. It is illegal to kill a newborn infant in all 50 states.”

From 2019 to 2021 in Morrison’s home state of Minnesota, there were at least eight reported cases in which newborn abortion survivors died post-birth, according to the Minnesota Department of Health. In five of those cases, no measures were reported to have been taken to save the babies’ lives. In the other three cases, “comfort care” was provided.

Other Democrats argued that the bill would allow for government interference in women’s reproductive health decisions and deprive parents of the opportunity to comfort their dying babies.

“Only 1 percent of all abortions happen at 21 weeks or later, and if they do, it is because of a serious fetal abnormality or the health of the mother,” Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.) said. “And if you are the one getting that news, it is heartbreaking, it is earth-shattering. And the last thing families need is government to interfere with their access to care.”

The bill’s passage in the House comes a day after Democrats unanimously opposed its advance in the Senate. With a 60-vote majority needed to invoke cloture, or limit debate, on a bill, the procedural vote failed 52-47.

That result was no surprise to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.).

Thune had noted hours before that he fully expected Democrats to reject what he felt should be a noncontroversial bill.

“We should all be able to agree that a baby born alive after an attempted abortion must be protected,” the majority leader said on the Senate floor.

“But I think it is safe to say that what it all boils down to is this: Democrats will oppose legislation to provide appropriate medical care to newborn children who survive abortions because they are afraid.”

If Democrats recognized the humanity of a living baby, born in an abortion clinic after a botched abortion, they might be forced to acknowledge the humanity of the unborn baby in that same clinic, Thune said.

Republicans have tried numerous times in recent years to pass legislation protecting the lives of newborn abortion survivors. Those efforts have been blocked by Democrats.

Tens of thousands, or perhaps hundreds of thousands, of pro-life advocates are expected to flood Washington on Jan. 24 for the 52nd annual National March for Life.

Vice President JD Vance is scheduled to speak at the event on behalf of the Trump administration. President Donald Trump will address the March in a video message, a White House official confirmed on Thursday.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/house-passes-bill-protect-babies-born-alive-after-failed-abortions

This is how long (and why) OpenAI's Operator holds onto your deleted data

 Operator, OpenAI's new AI agent, will save your deleted data for two months longer than deleted data from ChatGPT.

OpenAI has some noteworthy privacy policies nestled in the fine print of Operator's help page. One of which says that data from your Operator interactions — chats, browsing history, and screenshots — are kept in OpenAI's servers for up to 90 days after a user deletes them, per TechCrunch, which first spotted the discrepancy. ChatGPT retains deleted data for only 30 days.

Data retention policies are standard practice, and its common for them to range from months to years depending on the nature of the data. But fundamentally, Operator has access to personal and sensitive data by performing tasks on a user's behalf like browsing the web, logging onto sites (with your supervision), and taking regular screenshots of your screen in order to visually process the task at hand.

This data is automatically stored until you choose to delete it in your account settings. But even after you do that, "deleted chats and associated screenshots will be deleted from our systems within 90 days," said the help page.

Why does Operator save data longer than ChatGPT?

Naturally, this raises questions about why Operator data is saved for longer than ChatGPT data. An OpenAI spokesperson told Mashable, "as agents are a relatively new technology, we wanted to make sure our teams have the time to better understand and review potential abuse vectors." This allows the OpenAI team to improve security measures and protect from misuse, the spokesperson continued.

What does Operator do with my data?

On that note, OpenAI and "authorized service providers" can also access your Operator content. This is the same as ChatGPT's policy. But with Operator, that means OpenAI can also see screenshots, which adds a new level of Big Brother surveillance. OpenAI says this is in order to investigate illegal activity or misuse, provide technical support, or "handle legal matters."

Unless you've opted out, OpenAI also uses your Operator content to train its models. But the same setting that applies to ChatGPT also applies to Operator. So if you've already toggled off model sharing with ChatGPT, your Operator data stays with you. To enable this setting, go to your ChatGPT account page, then Data Controls, and click "Improve the model for everyone. In the popup window, toggle off this setting and hit Done.

Given the responsibility granted to Operator, OpenAI has taken other security measures. When it encounters a login page, it pauses and hands over access to the user for "take over mode." In this mode, Operator stops taking screenshots. It also has "watch mode" when navigating certain sites like Gmail, which requires the user's supervision.

https://mashable.com/article/openai-operator-save-user-data-months-longer-than-chatgpt