Search This Blog

Monday, August 12, 2024

Don’t Let The Camo Hat Distract You From Tim Walz’s Radical Record

 Walz’s record as governor of Minnesota is every bit as bad as that of the Biden-Harris administration, if not worse

Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., was largely unknown to voters across the country when Vice President Kamala Harris selected him as her running mate, so his record is coming under national scrutiny for the first time. Unfortunately for Walz and the Democrats, his record as governor of Minnesota is every bit as bad as that of the Biden-Harris administration, if not worse.

When the George Floyd riots began in Minneapolis in May 2020, Walz dithered. For four days, while Minneapolis and other cities burned, Walz refused to call out the National Guard. By the time the riots were finally brought under control, the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct station had been stormed by rioters and burned, along with many other buildings.

The result is a crime wave that continues to the present. Throughout its history, Minnesota had always been a low-crime state. But as a result of Walz’s anti-law enforcement policies, the rate of serious crimes in Minnesota now exceeds the national average. For the first time, Minnesota is officially a high-crime state.

Walz’s tenure has been equally destructive of Minnesota’s economy. Historically, Minnesota has been a relatively high-income state. Its per capita gross domestic product has always been higher than the national average. But that, too, is no longer true. Walz’s anti-business and anti-growth policies have taken their toll, so that beginning in 2023, Minnesota’s per capita GDP is below the national average. Walz has performed the remarkable feat of making Minnesota an economically below-average state.

Students Suffer

For many years, Minnesotans have believed that their public schools and students — like those of the fictional Lake Wobegon — are above average. That was true once, but not under Walz. The Walz administration has driven an explosion in spending on K-12 schools, but more spending has not meant better results. On the contrary, student performance has plummeted.

Currently, fewer than half of all K-12 students in Minnesota’s public schools can either read or do math at grade level. Shockingly, 64 percent of Minnesota’s 11th graders can’t do math at grade level. And in the most recent testing, both 4th and 8th grade reading proficiency is the lowest ever recorded. Some of this decline is due to Walz’s improvident closing of Minnesota’s schools during the Covid epidemic, but dismal test results continue to the present.

Costly Energy Policy

Walz is an admirer of California. He has never seen a left-wing California initiative that he hasn’t tried to import into Minnesota. Thus, he has been a strong advocate for wind and solar energy. He authored a proposal to require 100 percent of Minnesota’s electricity to come from wind and solar by 2040. Remarkably, there was no cost estimate for this plan, nor was there a feasibility study to show that it could be done. Energy experts at the Center of the American Experiment estimated the cost of Walz’s plan at $313 billion, a price that still could not assure reliable power. Nevertheless, Walz was able to get that legislation passed, and he signed it into law.

Because of Walz’s “green” initiatives, the cost of electricity in Minnesota has risen much faster than the national average. Minnesota has lost the competitive advantage of cheaper-than-average electricity. This no doubt contributes to Minnesota’s subpar economic growth.

Scandal and Population Loss

Walz’s administration has also been plagued by scandal. Most notoriously, $250 million was stolen from taxpayers in the Feeding Our Future scandal. The money supposedly went to feed poor children, but the meals for which the money was paid were almost entirely fictitious. Confronted with the facts, Walz lied, asserting falsely that his Department of Education had been required by court order to make the payments. That claim was so outrageous that the court took the remarkable step of issuing a public statement refuting it.

The acid test of policies in any state is, are people moving in or out? Sadly, Minnesota, which once was a magnet, now repels residents. Every year Minnesota suffers a net outflow of residents to other states. Minnesota loses residents in every age bracket, and in every income category above $50,000. (The only income bracket where Minnesota gains residents, on net, is 0 to $25,000.) Under Walz’s leadership, Minnesota has joined California, New York, and Illinois as a state that many people want to leave, and few want to move into.

So on policy, Walz’s record is one of failure. That being the case, what does he bring to the Democratic ticket?

Offending Rural Voters and Veterans

Democrats seem to think that Walz will appeal to swing voters in rural areas because he is a veteran and from a small town. They may be in for a rude awakening: Walz is despised in rural Minnesota, where he was routed in his re-election race in 2022. This is partly because he has been openly contemptuous of rural voters. He was famously caught on video telling fellow Democrats that they shouldn’t worry about those broad red swaths on the map, because rural areas are “mostly rocks and cows.” Thousands of small-town Minnesotans formed a group called Rocks and Cows of Minnesota, which sold merchandise and erected anti-Walz billboards.

As for being a veteran, Walz did serve in the Minnesota National Guard for 24 years, rising to a high rank. But when the Minnesota Guard was ordered to Iraq in 2005, rather than being deployed, Walz quit. Many of his fellow guardsmen are still bitter at what they regard as a betrayal.

Social Issues

Walz is hard left on bread and butter issues, but it is the social issues where he is most extreme. He advocated for and signed legislation that legalizes abortion up to the moment of birth, as well as a law that makes Minnesota a “trans refuge” state where minors can obtain transgender surgeries that would be illegal where they live. Walz actually suggested that Minnesota can reverse its current outflow of residents by being the state people come to for abortions and transgender operations.

Walz has defended stocking public school libraries with books that include graphic depictions of gay sex. He signed a law requiring tampon dispensers in all boys’ bathrooms in the public schools. More seriously, he backed and signed a law that will require every class in every Minnesota public school to include an “ethnic studies” component that incorporates critical race theory and is openly anti-American.

Walz’s record does not commend him as a candidate for national office, and his views are sufficiently out of the mainstream that Democrats can only hope they do not become widely known. No doubt, the national press will do its best to try to keep them quiet.


No, Kamala Harris cannot ‘flip the script’ on the border

 You may have seen reports that Vice President Kamala Harris, currently running for president without an agenda, plans to “flip the script” on the border. “Harris tries to flip the script on Trump on the border during raucous Georgia speech,” NPR reported after the vice president’s first rally, in Atlanta, on July 30. “She tried to flip the script on one of her most vulnerable issues in this election, immigration,” reported CNN. “Harris has tried to flip the script on the Republican attacks on her immigration record,” wrote the Washington Post.

You get the idea. The Harris strategy, if it can be called that, is to find a way to avoid blame for the Biden-Harris administration’s welcoming, encouraging, and accommodating more than 10 million illegal and unvetted border crossers who have entered the United States since Harris took office. The migrants have spread into cities and towns across the country, burdening municipalities struggling to house and feed them. Some have committed horrendous crimes. Culturally, on top of the nation’s existing immigration process, it is a bad idea to let in so many unassimilated migrants so quickly, since it overwhelms the country’s ability to turn them into Americans. And most fundamentally, the border rush represents an offense against the nation’s sovereignty and the rule of law. 

Large majorities of voters disapprove of the work Harris has done to make the border the disaster it has become since 2021. Approval ratings for the Biden-Harris handling of the border are routinely in the 30s and sometimes dip into the high 20s. An approval rating that low usually means a policy appeals to the core supporters of one political party and to no one else.

Harris’s open border policy — remember, she has played a key role in border affairs in the last 3 1/2 years — represents an enormous change from the policies of the last Democratic president, Barack Obama. In 2005, Obama said, “We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked, and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, and lawfully to become immigrants to this country. In 2021, as the Harris border stampede was accelerating, Obama said, “We’re a nation-state. We have borders. The idea that we can just have open borders is something that … as a practical matter, is unsustainable.”

To be brief: The Biden-Harris border is a disaster entirely of the president’s and vice president’s making. That will not change. One cannot “flip the script” on a disaster. 

Nevertheless, there are some in the nation’s press who appear eager to help Harris pull it off. After Harris’s rally in Arizona, Politico published a news account headlined, “Harris promises to go tough on border security.” The straight-faced opening paragraph of the story reported that Harris “promised to fight for ‘strong border security'” and attacked former President Donald Trump “for killing immigration legislation that would have curtailed asylum.” Harris’s words, Politico said, were “part of an aggressive effort by the Harris campaign to flip the issue of immigration and border security, long a political liability for Democrats and the vice president in particular.”

Now, why has the issue of immigration and border security long been a political liability for Harris in particular? The article did not say. But here is the answer: because she opened the nation’s southern border and allowed more than 10 million migrants to cross illegally and further allowed millions of them to stay.

Harris based her Arizona remarks on a jaw-dropping new ad she released the same day. Here is the entire text:

Kamala Harris has spent decades fighting violent crime. As a border state prosecutor, she took on drug cartels and jailed gang members for smuggling weapons and drugs across the border. As vice president, she backed the toughest border control bill in decades. And as president, she will hire thousands more border agents and crack down on fentanyl and human trafficking. Fixing the border is tough. So is Kamala Harris.

The extent to which Harris, as attorney general of California, “took on” international drug cartels and gangs is unclear. But notice that the next item mentioned in the ad is Harris’s support for the failed border bill in 2024. Harris waited through 2021, 2022, and 2023, until the beginning of 2024, which just happened to be an election year — Harris waited, while millions crossed the border illegally, to decide that she would become tough on the border. And now she promises to hire “thousands more border agents,” most of whom, it is safe to say, will be used to accommodate, rather than stop, the flow of migrants. And then: “Fixing the border is tough.” Yes, it is — and it is particularly tough if you, personally, played a huge role in screwing it up.

The Harris border episode shows the futility of the whole notion of “flipping the script.” To use a hypothetical example: Could Trump “flip the script” on abortion? In an appeal to undecided voters, could he make an ad for some swing states claiming that he has been a steadfast protector of abortion? That he would, in fact, be a far more effective protector than Harris, who he said did not “walk the walk” on the issue? Wouldn’t some Democrat think: “Hmmm, Trump did more than any other person to reverse Roe v. Wade — and with a record like that, he can’t just ‘flip the script’ on abortion. It doesn’t work that way.” A candidate with an indelible record on an issue can’t just say the word and purport to be the opposite, even if some biased or credulous reporters go along. When it comes to Harris and the border, the script can’t be flipped.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/daily-memo/3118293/no-kamala-harris-cannot-flip-the-script-on-the-border/

Gov Walz's COVID policy: Snitch lines, prolonged school closure, censor 'misinformation'

 Tim Walz is the Democratic vice presidential candidate and governor of Minnesota. I admit that I didn’t follow Minnesota closely during the COVID19 pandemic, but over the last few days, I have seen many discuss his handling of COVID.

COVID is over though. It is just a common cold, and nearly no Americans care about it anymore. Why should we care? The answer is the pandemic policy response reflects what politicians do when they face new challenges. They can’t rely on their party platform or talking points, but their intuition and intelligence. Here is what Tim Walz did.

He created a hotline so that you could complain about a neighbor that violated the stay at home order. You can listen to audio here.

He kept schools closed longer than even other Democratic governors like Gina Raimondo (Rhode Island). He did so likely because he is pro-teachers union.

When confronted with the fact that prolonged school closure was harmful he has repeatedly denied that.

Here he claims it taught kids resilience

In this video, he deflects the school closure question by asking if anyone considered the many who died of COVID19. The error of his reasoning here is that this implies that closure reduced the number of people who died. There is no evidence that it did so. In fact, the best studies at the time showed school closure harmed children without benefit to third parties. I discussed this repeatedly in 2020 on my show Plenary Session.

Finally, in this video clip, Tim Walz states that free speech does not apply to misinformation. Notably, during the pandemic the idea that lab leak was a possible viral origin source was deemed misinformation and censored by facebook. Many social media platforms restricted the ability to discuss vaccine side effects freely, claiming (wrongly) that myocarditis was misinformation.

In contrast with even other Republican governors like Ron DeSantis, and Democratic governors like Gina Raimondo, Tim Walz appears to have a very poor COVID19 policy track record characterized by blindly cheerleading for positions taken by the progressive left— even when those positions directly and maximally hurt poor minority children— the very kids progressives claim to care about.

In one interview the governor proudly touts his death rate per capita as evidence he did a good job. It would be foolish to compare this statistic unless it is adjusted for age, BMI, socioeconomics, population density and more. It is not a measure of good policy, and it is unscientific to use it as such.

My rating of Minnesota’s COVID19 policy: D+

https://www.drvinayprasad.com/p/tim-walzs-covid-policy-as-minnesota

Harris is wrong about medical debt

 Is Vice President Kamala Harris trying to rebrand as a centrist? She has recently disavowed her previous progressive positions on everything from border security to fracking to “Medicare for All.”

But she and her running mate remain enthusiastic about socializing medical debt. In a recent statement, Harris claimed that “more than 100 million Americans struggle with medical debt” and thus can’t afford loans for their cars, houses, and businesses.

Such rhetoric doesn’t reflect reality.

Start with that 100 million figure. It’s from a 2022 KFF poll and includes people who are paying medical bills on their credit cards or debt they owe to a family member or friend.

Other estimates are wildly different. The KFF-Peterson Health System Tracker looked at census data as of December 2021 and found that roughly 20 million U.S. adults have medical debt.

Regardless, most people with medical debt are not saddled with five- or six-figure bills. The KFF-Peterson analysis reported that 6 million owe $1,000 or less. Just under half of people with medical debt have bills no higher than $2,000. Fewer than 3 million owe more than $10,000.

The 2022 KFF survey data are in the same ballpark. More than half of those who said they had medical debt owed less than $2,500, while just 12% said they owed more than $10,000.

No one likes paying bills. But that doesn’t mean taxpayers should have to cover them.

Consider that the average “consumer unit” spent more than $580 on alcohol in 2022, more than $3,600 eating out, and $866 on “personal care products and services,” according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

When taxpayers are called upon to absorb the debts of others, should they also get to audit the debtors’ other spending, too?

Research shows that canceling medical debt does not deliver the boost that Harris implies. An April National Bureau of Economic Research paper found “no improvements in financial well-being or mental health from medical debt relief, reduced repayment of medical bills, and, if anything, a perverse worsening of mental health.”


Harris and her running mate, Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN), are not interested in such research. She has openly boasted that the administration has used taxpayer resources to forgive over $650 million in medical debt. She aims to spend a total of $7 billion in taxpayer money on canceling medical debt by 2026.

Harris may be trying to sound centrist. Her views on medical debt prove she’s anything but. 

Sally C. Pipes is president, CEO, and Thomas W. Smith fellow in healthcare policy at the Pacific Research Institute. Her latest book is False Premise, False Promise: The Disastrous Reality of Medicare for All (Encounter 2020).

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/3116703/harris-wrong-about-medical-debt/

Polish billionaire plans to sue Meta over fake ads

 Polish billionaire Rafal Brzoska and his wife plan to sue Meta over fake advertisements on Facebook and Instagram that feature his face and false information regarding her circulating on the social media platforms.

Brzoska said they have not yet decided on a jurisdiction to file the planned lawsuit, which would be another in a series of attempts globally to hold the internet giant accountable for ads that keep appearing even after users inform the company about problems.

A Meta spokesperson said the company removes false ads from its platforms when it learns about them, and works with local authorities to battle scammers.

Brzoska, creator of Polish parcel locker company InPost, said he notified Meta of the problem beginning of July, but it failed to find a solution.

"We plan to file a private lawsuit against Meta... We have not yet determined in which jurisdictions we will sue Meta. We will decide in the next few weeks," Brzoska told Reuters.

"...we are considering absolutely all scenarios, including a lawsuit in the United States if there is inaction in Europe," he added.

Brzoska said he and his wife would demand that Meta stop benefiting from the promotion of content that violates their rights and a large compensation donated to a charity, adequate to the level of advertising revenues from spreading this type of disinformation.

Last week the President of the Personal Data Protection Office obliged Meta Platforms Ireland Limited to stop the display of false advertisements using real data and the images of Brzoska and his wife on Facebook and Instagram in Poland for three months.

“Scammers use every platform available to them to defraud people and constantly adapt to evade getting caught. Scam content breaks our rules and we remove it when we find it,” a Meta spokesperson said in an e-mailed statement, adding the company was assessing the office's decision.

“We also partner with businesses, local administrations and law enforcement to defeat these committed criminals.”

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/polish-billionaire-plans-sue-meta-145542436.html