Search This Blog

Monday, September 21, 2026

Telehealth Companies Keep Exposing Customers' Medical Data. What Should They Do?

The appeal of telehealth is easy to explain: Instead of calling a doctor, booking an appointment, and hoping to eventually get a prescription, you can log onto an app or website and get approved for a new medication within minutes.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, scores of online health services have launched with the promise of quick, convenient access to drugs for attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder, sexual dysfunction, anxiety, weight loss, and more.

Increasingly, though, government regulators are accusing these companies of deceptive, unethical business practices, including disclosing their customers' health data, signing them up for hard-to-cancel subscriptions, and bypassing real-time consultations with doctors.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)'s latest lawsuit alleges that telehealth pioneer Hims & Hers engaged in all of those tactics, running afoul of U.S. consumer protection laws.

Hims has disputed the government's claims, calling them "an effort to generate headlines at our expense."

In recent years, FTC officials have filed similar cases against more than a half-dozen telehealth companies, including online therapy provider BetterHelp and pharmacy discount service GoodRx. In both cases, regulators said the companies shared users' health data with online platforms such as Meta and Google, without getting permission.

Experts say part of the problem is that federal laws that govern the handling of health information generally don't apply to telehealth companies.

"There's an entire universe of companies collecting huge amounts of consumer health data every day that aren't covered by our current health sector-specific laws," said Andrew Crawford, an attorney with the nonprofit Center for Democracy and Technology.

Here are some things to know before signing up for a telehealth service:

Don't Expect to Actually Talk to a Physician

Nearly all telehealth visits begin with a questionnaire in which users provide details about their medical history and possible medications they're interested in.

According to the FTC's lawsuit, Hims customers were automatically enrolled and billed for recurring prescriptions with "virtually no opportunity to review the provider's recommended treatment."

Researchers have documented similar practices across the industry, even for injectable weight-loss drugs that typically require a physical exam and other precautions before beginning treatment.

A recent analysis of nearly 50 telehealth companies selling GLP-1 drugs found that less than a third actually required any real-time video or audio consultation with a physician. In some cases, the prescriptions were approved within minutes.

"What we saw overwhelmingly was that it was incredibly easy to get access to the GLP-1s," said Reshma Ramachandran, MD, MPP, MHS, of Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, who led the study. "Most of the time, the prescription was automatically sent, without even an opportunity to stop the dispensing."

The lack of a real-time conversation means many patients aren't getting the type of care recommended by medical societies that prescribe GLP-1s, including discussions about weight-loss goals, past efforts, and eating disorders.

Only a little more than half the websites had a question about eating disorders -- which GLP-1 drugs can induce or worsen -- on their intake questionnaires, the researchers found.

Data May Be Shared With Advertisers, Social Media Companies

Americans often assume that any personal health information they share is protected by HIPAA, the federal privacy law that governs the handling of medical information. But the law generally only applies to specific types of health businesses, including medical offices, hospitals, and insurers, not telehealth companies offering prescriptions, counseling, DNA tests, and other online services.

Privacy experts say that legal gap is one reason companies continue to disclose sensitive health information to advertisers and search engines.

"There isn't a clear federal law saying: 'Don't do this,'" said Justin Brookman, Consumer Reports' director of technology policy. "There's just a body of soft law and settled cases with the FTC that many companies probably aren't even aware of."

Because HIPAA does not cover every direct-to-consumer health platform, the FTC has generally used its broader authority to take action against "fraudulent, deceptive or unethical business methods." In practice, that means showing that telehealth companies disclosed their customers' health information after initially saying they wouldn't.

Hims told customers that its platform offered a "100% online, private and secure" means of sharing information with the company's medical professionals, according to the FTC complaint. But instead the company shared the data with Meta and other online platforms, the FTC alleges.

Still, experts say the penalties available to regulators are limited. In most cases, companies sign a legal agreement stating that they'll stop the practices cited by regulators.

Lawmakers in California, Connecticut, Maryland, and other states have passed new online privacy laws that include special protections for health information. But there's been little enforcement against telehealth companies that break those rules.

Online Privacy Tools Offer a Bit of Protection

For now, privacy experts recommend using ad blockers and private web browsers -- sometimes called "incognito" windows -- when logging onto telehealth websites. Those tools can make it harder for companies to track your location, online history, and other personal information.

It's also a good idea to read any user agreements to get a sense of how the company plans to use your personal data, said Crawford. Some telehealth sites, for example, explicitly state in their privacy policies that they have the right to sell data about users' sex lives.

The only surefire way to protect your information may simply be to decline the terms of service, usually one of the first steps required before accessing telehealth.

"The system we have now overly burdens consumers to do a ton of work in terms of understanding how each piece of technology collecting their personal data is going to handle it," he said. "But even if you do all that work, you often have little agency."

https://www.medpagetoday.com/practicemanagement/telehealth/123078

Health Groups Up in Arms on Proposed 'Modifier 25' Rule Fee Cut

 A proposal from CMS to cut in half the payment for secondary services performed during outpatient visits is drawing fire from a variety of healthcare groups.

"The damage would be extensive to practices who offer procedures and E/M [evaluation and management] visits on the same day as it impacts many clinical scenarios (dermatology, otolaryngology, ophthalmology, and many more)," Anders Gilberg, senior vice president for government affairs at the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA), said in an email to MedPage Today. "MGMA members have relayed to us significant projected financial losses if this cut would go into effect."

Under the proposed rule, known as the "modifier 25 rule," if two or more services are performed on the same day, "the most expensive service (either surgical or E/M visit) would be paid at 100%, and all other surgical procedure(s) or E/M visit(s) would be paid at 50%," CMS explained in a July 16 Federal Register notice.

For example, suppose a patient goes to the doctor for an outpatient E/M visit, which is billed using CPT code 99212, and then has two skin lesions removed, one billed under CPT code 11300, and the other -- a slightly bigger lesion -- billed under CPT code 11301. Because the second skin lesion removal code is the highest-paid service of the three, that code will get paid at 100%, while payments for the office visit and removal of the smaller skin lesion will be reduced by 50%.

"We continue to believe that there are efficiencies when the same physician (or a physician in the same group practice) provides an E/M service for the same patient in conjunction with a procedure with a global period, and that we are likely duplicating payment under the current payment methodology," the authors wrote in explaining the proposal, which was originally proffered in 2019 but later withdrawn.

The comment period on the proposal, which is part of a larger rule on physician payment and other issues, ended Monday. The agency has until Nov. 1 to issue a final rule; it could include the modifier 25 proposal as-is, make changes to it, or leave it out entirely.

Gilberg said the proposal isn't necessary. "CMS already possesses numerous ways to deal with duplication," he said, noting that the RBRVS Update Committee (RUC), which makes recommendations to CMS regarding payment rates, already accounts for overlap, and CMS also has a "misvalued code initiative" that addresses overpayment for specific services.

"We've been urging CMS to rescind the proposal in its entirely, as it's unsupported by evidence and would harm Medicare beneficiaries' access to these important same-day services," he said. "CMS discussed in the proposed rule other potential cuts such as 25% as an option, but those cuts are similarly unsupported by evidence and would still arbitrarily harm medical groups' ability to offer same-day care."

MGMA is not alone in its concerns. "CMS advances this policy on an unsubstantiated assumption of 'likely' duplication, without the evidence a change of this magnitude requires, and without addressing the concerns that led the agency to decline a substantially similar proposal in 2019," the American Medical Association (AMA) and 150 other healthcare organizations, including the MGMA, said in a letter to CMS administrator Mehmet Oz, MD, MBA. "We appreciate the Trump administration's emphasis on keeping independent physician practices sustainable, yet we believe the unintended consequence of CMS' proposed policy will make it extremely difficult for those practices to remain viable."

Another group opposing the proposed rule is the American Independent Medical Practice Association (AIMPA), which represents independent outpatient practices. "Unfortunately, it's going to change how we provide healthcare," Rick Snyder, MD, a Dallas cardiologist who is AIMPA's vice president, said in a phone interview. "It's going to penalize physicians for providing comprehensive same-day care for patients who can't afford to wait."

He cited the example of a melanoma patient who comes in for a routine screening. "Say the dermatologist finds a suspicious lesion somewhere else on the body," Snyder said. "Ideally, you would like to try to remove that same day, or biopsy it, and to make sure you get timely diagnosis and treatment for that. Through this proposal, providing both services ... would trigger a 50% cut for the [less expensive] E/M code, and even though the same-day procedure possibly saved Medicare hundreds of thousands of dollars by avoiding surgery or immunotherapy for advanced melanoma, they're going to be penalized for that." He also cited similar examples for ophthalmology and rheumatology procedures.

In addition to the problems it will cause physicians and their patients, the evidence for making this change is unclear, Snyder said. "They never presented any data behind it -- it just came out of nowhere," he said. "It really fragments care."

There are some signs that physicians' concerns about the proposed rule are being heard on Capitol Hill, he said. "There's a lot of unanimity that CMS should walk this back. ... So we're hopeful and we're getting signs that CMS is listening, but we're anxiously waiting to see what the final rule is going to show."

https://www.medpagetoday.com/practicemanagement/reimbursement/123080

This Year's Forbes Healthcare Billionaires

 Fifteen of the 400 richest people in America made their fortunes in healthcare -- and four of them are physicians, according to Forbes' annual ranking.

At the top of the pack is Thomas Frist Jr., MD, and his family, whose net worth is a whopping $33.6 billion.

Frist and his father co-founded Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Healthcare in the 1960s, which owns 190 hospitals and 2,400 sites of care. Frist, a former Air Force flight surgeon, is the 32nd wealthiest American but the richest person in the country with a healthcare business.

Next in line is Robert Duggan, the 96th richest person in the nation, who has a net worth of $13.4 billion. In 2015, Duggan sold his biopharmaceutical company Pharmacyclics to Abbvie for a hefty profit. Duggan then invested in the oncology drug company Summit Therapeutics, where he is now co-CEO.

Charlie Mills is the third wealthiest healthcare billionaire and the 141st richest person in the U.S. He's the chairman of the medical supplies giant Medline, which his dad and uncle founded in the 1960s.

Patrick Soon-Shiong, MD, is the fourth richest healthcare billionaire and 151st wealthiest overall. Soon-Shiong is a surgeon who invented the blockbuster drug protein-bound paclitaxel (Abraxane) for treating cancer. He also founded and sold the companies American Pharmaceutical Partners and Abraxis BioScience. Soon-Shiong owns the Los Angeles Times and about 4% of the Los Angeles Lakers.

A few other doctors and scientists have made their fortunes in healthcare:

  • Keith Dunleavy, MD, founder of the cloud-based software and healthcare analytics firm Inovalon
  • August Troendle, MD, founder and CEO of Medpace, a clinical research company
  • Li Ge, PhD, chairman and CEO of WuXi AppTec, a company that provides services to biotech and pharma industries

While the 15 healthcare billionaires have a combined net worth of more than $136 billion, tech giants still overwhelmingly top the Forbes list.

Elon Musk is the richest man by a wide margin; his net worth of $908 billion is more than double that of the second wealthiest man, Jeff Bezos, whose net worth is $378 billion. For reference, Musk's net worth is $874.4 billion greater than Frist, the richest healthcare billionaire, making Musk about 27 times richer than Frist.

Healthcare's 2026 Top U.S. Billionaires

1. Thomas Frist, Jr., MD (32/400)

HCA Healthcare

Net worth: $33.6 billion

2. Robert Duggan (96)

Pharmacyclics

Net worth: $13.4 billion

3. Charlie Mills (141)

Medline

Net worth: $11 billion

4. Patrick Soon-Shiong, MD (151)

Abraxane

Net worth: $10.3 billion

5. Li Ge, PhD (156)

WuXi AppTec

Net worth: $10.1 billion

6. Carl Cook (187)

Cook Group

Net worth: $8.8 billion

7. Ronda Stryker (241)

Stryker Corp.

Net worth: $7.1 billion

8. John Brown (251)

Stryker Corp.

Net worth: $6.9 billion

9. Reinhold Schmieding (293)

Arthrex

Net worth: $5.8 billion

10. Andy Mills (311)

Medline

Net worth: $5.5 billion

11. Jon Stryker (325)

Stryker Corp.

Net worth: $5.2 billion

12. Wendy Abrams (367)

Medline

Net worth: $4.7 billion

13. Stewart Rahr, JD (367)

Kinray

Net worth: $4.7 billion

14. Keith Dunleavy, MD (375)

Inovalon

Net worth: $4.6 billion

15. August Troendle, MD (396)

Medpace

Net worth: $4.4 billion

Both Charlie and Andy Mills, as well as Abrams, Dunleavy, and Troendle, are all newcomers to the Forbes 400 this year.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/123085

Kennedy's New Autism Research Program Aims to Speed Diagnoses

 HHS launched a new research effort on Thursday to change how autism is diagnosed through the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the agency announced.

The Systems for Phenotypic Evaluation, Clinical Trajectories, Response, and Agency (SPECTRA) program will integrate biological, clinical, behavioral, and real-world data to enable earlier diagnoses, identify factors involved in developmental trajectories, and advance personal approaches to autism care, according to HHS.

"Autism is not one-size-fits-all, and our science and care cannot be either," HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated. "SPECTRA will harness the best of American science and innovation to deliver those answers and turn them into better outcomes for people with autism and their families," he said in a news release.

"Over the past decade, we have become much better at recognizing autism and the substantial differences among people across the spectrum. Yet our approaches to assessment and care have not kept pace, and they overlook the behavioral and biological complexity of each person," added Russell Shilling, PhD, SPECTRA's program manager. "SPECTRA is designed around that complexity."

The program aims to integrate genetic factors, exposome and epigenetic features, microbiome biology, and other variables to create computational models of autism subtypes. Researchers will then develop a system that can identify autism risk factors, match individuals to appropriate interventions, and accelerate clinical research for new adaptive therapies, HHS said.

"This new ARPA-H initiative is a unique opportunity for the autism research community," noted Helen Tager-Flusberg, PhD, of Boston University and founder of the Coalition of Autism Scientists.

"It offers major funding to incorporate technology into clinical practices and interventions in innovative ways," Tager-Flusberg told MedPage Today. "As long as the review process is grounded in science and the projects are conducted by experienced researchers, following rigorous best practices, I am optimistic that this could be transformative."

Since taking office, Kennedy has focused on environmental causes of autism after years of promoting claims that vaccines cause the condition, despite decades of evidence to the contrary. Skepticism about his agenda led researchers and advocacy leaders to establish an independent board this year to coordinate work among nongovernment autism research funders and create a scientific agenda for the autism community.

About 1 in 31 children age 8 in the U.S. have been identified with autism spectrum disorder, according to the CDC. Autism assessments often happen after developmental differences emerge, and late diagnosis is common.

The ARPA-H program comes a year after HHS announced a $50 million Autism Data Science Initiative, which awarded funds to 13 autism research projects to identify autism causes and improve outcomes.

ARPA-H said it wants solutions in four technical areas: analysis, modeling, precision intervention, and enabling technologies. Solicitation documents, submission requirements, and deadlines are detailed on the SPECTRA website.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/autism/123086

Homeless camp rises near NYU dorm as vagrants brag street life ‘much better’ under Mamdani

A new Skid Row encampment popped up across the street from NYU dorms — with vagrants bragging that living on the streets of the Big Apple is “much better” under Mayor Zohran Mamdani.

The 30-foot-long shantytown at East Ninth Street and Third Avenue sits just outside Ukrainian Village Park, with a long blue tarp covering office chairs, luggage and bicycles on the sidewalk, in plain sight of both passersby and the college students who live across the street, The Post has learned.

“Some people are nice, some people think we invade their space,” Raymond, 45, who lives in the shelter, said Monday. “I was in a Bowery shelter and they stole my stuff. I’d rather be outside.”

A homeless man inside his encampment across the street from NYU dorms in Manhattan.Kevin C. Downs for NY Post

He said roughing it on the sidewalk is “much better” since Mamdani took office.

“The past mayor had the police and they just came through and took stuff,” Raymond said. “Now they ask if we are ok and need help.”

Unsightly homeless encampments have dotted the city over the past year, including a blocks-long shantytown near the Intrepid Museum on Manhattan’s West Side that went unchecked until The Post blew the whistle — with the city finally moving in to try to clear it out.

A filthy encampment also turned a stretch of the East Side under the FDR Drive into a trash heap, while an outdoor flophouse has overtaken the sidewalk in trendy Greenwich Village.

Three people were inside a homeless encampment on East 9 Street when police received a 311 call.Kevin C. Downs for NY Post
Raymond, 45, said living on the sidewalk in the city is safer and better than bedding down in a legit shelter.Kevin C. Downs for NY Post

Mamdani’s policy for dealing with the encampments handcuffs cops, and instead sends city outreach workers to try to sweet talk and offer services to the vagrants — who often just move down the street.

After seven days, police and sanitation workers are sent in to remove the rubbish.

Raymond and his pal Dave, who were lounging near the NYU encampment on Sunday, said the hands-off policy makes living on the streets preferable over legit shelters, where theft and abuse is common.

“There are plenty of services out there if you want it,” said Dave, 31. “This is a choice. If you wanted to be inside, you could. I have friends who froze to death over the last two winters just because they wanted to be outside.”

Homeless encampments have popped up throughout the Big Apple, thanks to City Hall’s hands-off approach.Kevin C. Downs for NY Post

He said he worked as a waiter on Long Island but ended up homeless after getting hooked on drugs.

“At night, you have the drunk NYU kids talking s–t,” he added. “You see both sides of it.”

NYPD cops responding to a 311 complaint showed up at the scene on Sunday, and told the sidewalk squatters to “condense and get rid of some stuff,” then left.

“It doesn’t look a lot different from Los Angeles,” one passerby said, referring to Skid Row.

https://nypost.com/2026/09/21/us-news/homeless-camp-pops-up-across-the-street-from-nyu-dorm/

Gaza journo who met with Mamdani admits buried Oct. 7 footage of Israeli hostage beating to protect perps

 A Gaza journalist who has met with Mayor Mamdani and been honored with a Nobel Peace Prize nomination and a spot on the Time100 list admitted that he buried footage of Israeli hostages being beaten by a Palestinian mob on Oct. 7, 2023 in order to protect the perpetrators.

Photographer Motaz Azaiza also revealed that all media in Gaza is controlled by Hamas through a single WhatsApp group — and the terror group will target any journalist who publishes criticism.

Azaiza — who has become one of the most famous journalists in Gaza — was in the territory on Oct. 7, when Hamas marched the hostages taken from Israel through the streets of Gaza, where all hell broke loose.

“People got out, watched, beat them, hit them, and I followed them and filmed,” Azaiza told the Taqarrab podcast.

“But I did not publish those videos.”

Palestinian photojournalist Motaz Azaiza said he did not publish footage of Gazans beating the Israeli hostages when they were brought in by Hamas.Anadolu via Getty Images
Palestinians and Hamas militants transport slain hostage Yarden Bibas to Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023.AP

“Why? Because I did not want to ruin the lives of the people who were filmed,” the photographer said.

“I understood that Israel would use those videos to identify every person who was there and eliminate them.”

“I did not want to be responsible, even indirectly, for the deaths of those people in exchange for a few likes and views online,” he added.

Aziza also revealed that “every journalist in Gaza” is in a Hamas-run WhatsApp group called “Smart” that coordinates coverage in Gaza. One of the Hamas media directors based at the Rafa Crossing ran it, he said.

Aziza went on to say that he was targeted by pro-Hamas media — run through that channel — when he showed a video of a Gaza resident cursing Hamas.

Motaz Azaiza poses with Mayor Mamdani. He attended Mamdani’s election night party.Motaz Azaiza / Instagram

“Photographers in Gaza have become accustomed to lowering their cameras the moment someone says something bad about Hamas, he said, “because anyone who dares to show reality is persecuted relentlessly.”

He said he had to flee the territory after publishing people criticizing Hamas. He now lives in Qatar.

Despite Azaiza withholding the footage of the hostages being beaten as part of his coverage of the war, some of the hostages who were paraded around the Gaza Strip on Oct. 7 eventually spoke out about the ordeal.

Itay Regev, a survivor of the Nova Music Festival massacre, said Hamas had driven him and others around the streets of Gaza and displayed them like human “trophies” to the angry crowds.

Palestinian militants drive back to the Gaza Strip with the body of Shani Louk, a German-Israeli dual citizen.AP

Outrage also broke out when reports emerged on how the body of slain hostage Shani Louk was desecrated by Hamas, with crowds in Gaza cheering and spitting on her corpse.

Along with his admission, Azaiza also criticized Hamas for plunging the Palestinian enclave into a war that has leveled huge portions of the territory — and resulted in the deaths of an estimated 73,000 people.

He also slammed Hamas for cracking down on local journalists who depicted the horrors in Gaza, which forced many like Azaiza to flee the enclave in the early months of the war.

Motaz Azaiza attends the 2024 TIME100 Gala at Jazz at Lincoln Center in New York.Getty Images for TIME
“You brought us back to the Middle Ages,” he said of Hamas. “You caused women in Gaza to urinate into a plastic bucket. This does not bother you, but what bothers you is if someone suddenly criticizes you?”

Azaiza was named among Time magazine’s 100 most influential people in 2024 for his nearly four month coverage of the war, where he highlighted civilian deaths and the destruction caused by the conflict between Israel and Hamas.

He has also met with with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and even attended his election night watch party last November.

Despite the acclaim, he said he is haunted by what he saw in the Gaza Strip during the war.

“Gaza is the most toxic place in the world. You love it, but at the same time you hate it. You love it, but it hurts you and destroys you,” he said.

“The reality there forced things upon me that I never wanted — the price we pay to satisfy leaders who do not count us is simply unimaginable.”

https://nypost.com/2026/09/21/world-news/gaza-journalist-who-met-with-mamdani-admits-he-buried-footage-of-israeli-hostages-being-beaten-to-protect-perpatrators/